18
Reading Assessment: What are we assessing? TED 406 Fall 2010 Session 4 Jill A. Aguilar, Ph.D.

Ted406 session 4

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Reading Assessments: What are we assessing? Overview of Rakes & Smith

Citation preview

Page 1: Ted406 session 4

Reading Assessment: What are we assessing?

TED 406 Fall 2010Session 4

Jill A. Aguilar, Ph.D.

Page 2: Ted406 session 4

We can be assessing…

•READERS, • TEXTS, •CONTEXTS, •CONTENT…

Page 3: Ted406 session 4

Secondary Texts

• Secondary texts are often more difficult than elementary texts for 2 main reasons: – 1 the vocabulary, concepts, and “readability”

(estimated grade level= length of words, number of words per sentences, number of sentences per paragraph) are higher than students are comfortable with, and

– 2 they are typically written in expository, rather than narrative style.

Page 4: Ted406 session 4

Expository Texts

• Expository texts set out to describe objects, events or processes in an objective manner, present or convey an argument, to state the solution to a problem or to explain a situation.

• Most elementary students learn to read using narrative texts and trade texts. Narrative is a genre or text type which tells a story or gives an account of real or imaginary events. It includes an orientation, a complication, a climax and a resolution.

Page 5: Ted406 session 4

Task 1: Learning About Students

• For Task 1, you want to know how your students can be expected to interact with and perform in specific subject matter materials in order to make appropriate instructional decisions.

Page 6: Ted406 session 4

• A few points about assessment…

Page 7: Ted406 session 4

1. Assess what you intend to assess.

• Often teachers assess reading skills when they want to assess content knowledge, and content knowledge when they want to assess reading skills.

• Ask, will the results of this assessment tell me how well my students read, or how much and what they know about [algebra]?

Page 8: Ted406 session 4

1. Assess what you intend to assess.

What are you assessing? • Prior knowledge about a topic you plan to teach• Reading knowledge and skills in English• Studying knowledge and skills in English• Skills in reasoning and logic• Attitudes toward school• Experience and knowledge about taking standardized tests• Knowledge about a topic you are presently teaching• Knowledge and skills acquired from a unit you have finished

teaching• Knowledge and skill acquired from your course by the end of the

year

Page 9: Ted406 session 4

2. Once you have identified your target, state your purpose.

For what purpose(s) are you assessing?• Formal (valid & reliable) v. Informal (may or may not be valid

and reliable)– Valid- assesses what it purports to assess– Reliable- assesses various groups at different times in the same way

• Survey (a snapshot; may be used before, during, after teaching)

• Formative (the teaching is still teaching the topic) v. Summative (the teacher is done teaching that topic)

• Criterion-Based (everyone can score 100%) v. Standardized (follows a normal curve)

Page 10: Ted406 session 4

3. Once you have assessed, analyze your assessment.

If it was worth assessing, it is worth analyzing. What do these data mean? What are their implications for your next steps in instruction?

• Faculty-wide: Analyze school-wide CST data• Departments: Analyze departmental CST data• SLC’s, Cores, etc.: Analyze the longitudinal data for your

students• Teachers: Analyze your pre-assessment, checks for

understanding, other formative assessments, and your summative assessments.

Page 11: Ted406 session 4

3. Once you have assessed, analyze your assessment.

Teachers, Ask:– Where are your students now?– How far have they come?– What has been easy? What has been difficult?

Why?– Where should they go next?– How should they get there?

Page 12: Ted406 session 4

The MOST VALUABLE TYPE OF ASSESSMENT FOR TEACHERS IS…

• Ongoing, informal assessment that matches the types of learning activities that students have been engaged in…

Page 13: Ted406 session 4

Principles of assessment

• Procedures and instruments must be content specific;

• Easily constructed and scored;• Group administered;• Representative of the types of reading skills

that students would be expected to use in their science, history, or other subject area classes

Page 14: Ted406 session 4

For Task 1

• you want to know how your students can be expected to interact with and perform in specific subject matter materials in order to make appropriate instructional decisions.

Page 15: Ted406 session 4

Types of assessments in Rakes & Smith:

Surveying Content Area Reading Interests• Background Knowledge and Reader Interest

Surveys help the teacher evaluate student interest, attitude, and prior knowledge.– Open-ended projective– Structured, paired choice– Summated or agree/disagree– Semantic differential

Page 16: Ted406 session 4

Types of assessments in Rakes & Smith:

Group Reading Inventory• Especially useful for courses that are textbook-

dependent like Social Studies, Science, and Math.– Part One—Using Book Parts– Part Two—Silent Reading

Page 17: Ted406 session 4

Types of assessments in Rakes & Smith:

Cloze Inventory• Helps tell which students can and cannot read the

book from which the Cloze Inventory is taken; how good is the match between students and text?– Independent Level (96-100%): Student can read text on

her/his own and comprehend without instruction– Instructional Level (90-95%): Student can comprehend the

text with assistance– Frustration Level (-94%): Student requires more

assistance than is practical; the text is probably too difficult

Page 18: Ted406 session 4

Types of assessments in Rakes & Smith:

Interactive Assessments (more appropriate over time)

• Checklists• Interviews• Portfolios