5
JOURNAL O F k ESEARCH of the Notional Bureau of Standards-·C. Engineering and Instrumentation Vol. 64C, No . 1, January-March 1960 Temperature Stratification in a Nonventing Liquid Helium Dewar l L. E. Scott , R. F. Robbins, D. B. Mann, and B. W. Birmingham (August 25, 1959) Th e presence of a large te mp e ratur e g radi ent in De wars used for tran sporting heliu m is und es ira bl e beca use it m ay be acco mp a ni ed by unn ecessar il y hi'?; h int ernal pre ss ur es wh en the conte nt s a re sea led. In a st ud y of the probl em s, s uch gradients were observed in exp eri- me nt s co ndu cted wi th a 39.7-liter sta inless stee l Dewar. A met hod is s hown for calculat in g the press ur e ri se in the ab sence of temper at ur e gr ad ie nt s an d the res ult s a re comp ared with the ob sen 'ed press ur e rise. In s ome cases cun 'es re pre senti nt!; calc ul ated a nd observed preSR ur e ri se inter sect. A possible explan at ion of this s ituat ion is given. Th e d estrat ifying e ff ect of a concentr ated h eat in p u t and of cop per wd s is s hown . 1. Introduction For mall Y applicat,io ns, a g:reaLer economy of transportation can be achi ev rd by s hipping Il ol ium aL mod erat e pr essures at or near the liquid densi ty rather t. han as a warm compre ssed gas [1].2 Savll1gs can be realized evon th oug h the end usc of the produ ct is in gaseous f orm . Th e tran s portation and s Lorage, however, sh ould be ac comp li shed with no loss of helium to k eep (, otaI costs minimal. AD ideal method i f' on e in which Lhe hca,t input to the Dewar incr eases th e pressure a nd temperature of the con- teDts rath er Lban ca uf' ing loss of helium by evapora- tion. Temp erature grad ients may exist in conLain ers of small b eat :flux as a conse quon ce of tile low the rma l conductivity of helium n eal' its normal boiling poinL , 6.3 X 10- 5 cal/ cm 0 K sec foJ' the liquid [2] a nd 5.3 X 10- 5 eal/ cm 0 K soc [or Lhe vapo r [3]. A l aye r of warm fluid at the top of the co nta iner h as no te nd ell cy to mix . In add ition , warm helium any where in the contain er wi ll te nd to rise to the top of the contain er a nd in crease the tem- perature gradient. For exampl e, at 3 atm, 5.5 0 Ie fluid is over twice as dense as fluid at 6.5 0 Ie [4]. The practical signifi. cance of a temper ature gra di ent in a self-pressurizing system is the difference in th e rate of pressur e rise as co mpar ed to a in thermal equilibrium . Th e obj ect of th e experim ent to be describ ed was to verify the exi ste nce of temp erature gra dien ts in a no nv ent ing D ewar a nd to determine the a pproximate magnitude of these gra dient s by experimental meas ur ements . 2. Theoretical Pressure Rise at Thermal Equilibrium From tbe firsL l aw of thermodynamics, eq (1), a nd the definition of entha lp y, eq (2), we ha ve: I Thi s wOlk was supported by t il e Bureau of Aeronauti cs, Department of the Nav'v 2 Figm es in brackets ind icate t he litera ture references at the end of tbis paper. 19 tJ. U= Q- H' H = U + pv wher e Q= heat added to Lh e sys Lem , U= internal ell ergy fun ction, H= ent hal py fun ction , nT= work done by the system, co nl ain er vol ume (1) (2) p= press ur e, v=s pee if ic vo lum e total m ass of liquid a nd vapo r. Since the pro cess is one of consta nt volume a nd the exLern al work betwee n Lhe s \'stem and its SLl ings is Z0 1'O we hav e: - or /:, U= Q MI =Q+vtJ.p Q= /:, U= M-l- v/:,p (3) A conven ient m ethod of expr ess in g eq (3) is a plot of pr ess ur e ve rsus in ternal en er gy for various specific volumes [4] as s hown in fi gure 1. Th is pro cess can b e illu st rat ed by following an isochor (line of constant volume) for the horizon tal di sta nce cOl'l' esp onding to tJ. U or Q. 3. Previous Experiments Previous ex peri men ts condu cted by W'ilson and Robbin s of this wit h a 2.3-liter capacity De war constructed of hi gh thermal co ndu ctiv it y copper, have pre ssure rise results which agree with pr edicted valu es obta in ed from figure 1. Th e co pp er const ru ction assured th at the con ten ts were in thermal equi librium. Th e range of specific vol- ume s covered in the experim ents were 7.8 to 13.0 li ter /kg. Th e press ur e was all owed to ris e to 5 at m.

Temperature stratification in a non venting liquid helium Dewar · 2011-12-09 · Temperature Stratification in a Nonventing Liquid Helium Dewarl L. E. Scott, R. F. Robbins, ... to

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

JOURNAL OF kESEARCH of the Notional Bureau of Standards-·C. Engineering and Instrumentation

Vol. 64C, No. 1, January-March 1960

Temperature Stratification in a Nonventing Liquid Helium Dewar l

L. E. Scott, R. F. Robbins, D. B. Mann, and B. W. Birmingham

(August 25, 1959)

The prese nce of a large temperature gradien t in D ewars used for transporting heliu m is undesirable because it m ay be accompa nied by unnecessar ily h i'?;h intern al pressures when the co ntents a re sealed. In a study of t he problems, such gradients were obse rved in experi­ments conducted wi th a 39.7-liter stainless steel D ewar. A method is shown for calcu lat in g the pressure ri se in t he absence of te mperature grad ients and the results a re compared with the obsen 'ed pressure rise. In some cases cu n 'es representint!; calculated and obse rved preSRure rise in tersect. A possible ex planation of t his situation is given. The destratifying effect of a co ncen t rated heat inp ut and of copper wds is shown .

1. Introduction

For mall Y applicat,ions, a g:reaLer econo my of transportation ca n be ac hievrd by shipping Ilolium aL mod erate pressures at or n ear th e liquid density rather t.han as a warm compressed gas [1].2 Savll1gs can be realized evon though the end usc of th e product i s in gaseous form. Th e transportation and sLorage, how ever , should b e accompli shed with no loss of helium to k eep (,otaI costs minimal. AD ideal method if' on e in which Lhe hca,t input to the Dewar increases the pressure and temperature of t he con­teDts rather Lban cauf' ing loss of h elium by evapora­tion.

Temperature gradients may exist in conLain ers of ver~- small b eat :flux as a consequonce of tile low thermal conductivity of helium n eal' i ts normal boiling poinL, app roximatel ~' 6.3 X 10- 5 cal/cm 0 K sec foJ' t he liquid [2] and 5.3 X 10- 5 eal/cm 0 K soc [or Lhe vapo r [3]. A layer of warm fluid at the top of the contain er has no tendell cy to mix. In addition , warm helium anywhere in the container will tend to rise to the top of the container a nd increase t he tem­perature gradient. For example, at 3 atm, 5.5 0 Ie fluid is over twice as den se as fluid at 6.5 0 Ie [4]. The practical signifi.cance of a temper ature gradient in a self-pressurizing system is the difference in the rate of pressure rise as compared to a s~Tstom in thermal equilibrium.

The object of the experiment to be described was to verify the existence of temperature gradien ts in a nonventing D ewar and to determine the approximate magnitude of these gradients by experimental m easurements .

2 . Theoretical Pressure Rise at Thermal Equilibrium

From t be firsL law of thermodynamics, eq (1) , and the definition of en t halpy, eq (2), we have:

I This wOlk was supported by t ile Bureau of Aeronautics, Department of the Nav'v

2 Figm es in brackets ind icate t he literature references at the end of tbis paper.

19

tJ. U= Q- H'

H = U+ pv

where Q= h ea t added to Lh e sys Lem , U= internal ellergy fun ction, H = enthalpy fun ction , n T= work don e by the sys tem ,

co nla i n er vol ume

(1)

(2)

p = pressure,

v=speeific volum e total m ass o f liquid and

vapo r.

Si nce th e process is one of constant volume a nd th e exLernal work betwee n Lhe s \'s tem and i ts SLl rroLlnd ~ ings is Z01'O we have: -

or

/:, U= Q

MI= Q+vtJ.p

Q= /:, U= M-l- v/:,p (3)

A convenient method of expressing eq (3) is a plot of pressure versus in ternal en ergy for various specific vol umes [4] as shown in figure 1. Th is process can b e illustrated by following a n isochor (line of constant volume) for th e horizontal distance cOl'l'esponding to tJ. U or Q.

3. Previous Experiments

Previous experimen ts conducted by W'ilson and Robbins of this laborator~\r with a 2.3-li ter capacity D ewar constructed of high thermal conductivity copper, have ~iven pressure rise r esults which agr ee with predicted values obtain ed from figure 1. The copper construction assured that the con ten ts were in thermal equilibrium. The range of specific vol­umes covered in the experiments were 7.8 to 13.0 li ter/kg. The pressure was allowed to rise to 5 atm .

100

(/)

a.

96

92

88

84

80

7 6

7 2

6 8

6 4

6 0

6

w 5 a::: ::> (J)4 (J) W a::: a.. 4

2

8

4

4 0

3 6

3 2

2 8

2 4

0

16

12

8

4

4°K

,

I \

\

i \

/

j V I 1\ f, I

I , 1,1 , \ \

\ 1\ Ii I \

I Ii \

Ii \ I \ \ i.,., 0 ,<Xl crf I :c ({ 0

:;f I\2 f- ==r '" '" ~ crl \

\ ,.:

\ \ I \ I f II \ 1

\ I II 1\ , , \ \ 11\

I \ 17 I

\ I 1\ I il

\ \ \ I Ii i II 1\ 1 7

\ II ~L I

~" , \ I

'\ I I \ , 17/

lL, .L

\ if/I I 'I//.

,VII V V \ Ifl f/I/VV ,/

f7' Vi/V ,/V l7

~VI '/ V V ,/

IIWV,V V V ~~!Y' /

w / /'

I

' I II 1/\

':::'

I I

II

'\

I'~ II

I I

II I -- J

II

/

r7 V

I \ / \ II IT I I

\ 11 \ \

\ I \ 7 / I l/ I II , )'\ , I I , 1;1,

i l I

1'1 / r , J \

II 1\ I I \ I \

, II II I

1 ,

f-- 7f1: 7 ' 0. X \ I I .... I

/ , ~/ \

\ I , t:"'j , \ II " I I II ". \

'It I J\ 1\ :!:' /

II \ \ II ' f. 1\/ 1\ \

I II \ If, \ "''<>; \

I I , " I \ II \ ,

" II II \ 1\ I f" / 1\ , I \ \

I / \ \ I \ I 1\ if \

11\ , / \

1\ \ ,

\ \

if / \ VI I I

"- \ / I I , \ \ I

II " V \ \ I 7'" ,/

~ IJl' -

'" I rx., \ \ \ --1

V ~ V 1\ , \ \/ \ j , ,

~ / 1\ \ \ 7 8°K

V \ \ , IX 6.5

t-- V 6

I I~ 5.5

'I V 5

4.5°K

I I

o 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40

U,j/g

FIG U R E l. Pressure-internal ene1'gy diagram Jar helium, a to 100 psia .

The D ewar used in these experimen ts had a fill t ube with a temperature gradien t from 4° to 76° K . One migh t erroneously speculate that if a con tainer is filled wi th liquid hr jium to a greater level than that corresponding to the cri tical density , the liquid m eniscus migh t expand in to the fill tube. This phenomenon did not OCCllr, undoub tedly as a resul t

20

of the high compressibili ty of liquid helium (O.0025g/ cm3/atm at 2.5 atm and 4° K [5]).

It was concluded from t he expErimen tal resul ts t hat t he heat input was no t aftected by a ris ing liquid meniscus in the D ewar , and that pressure ri se as a function of total heat inpu t may be accura tcl~r predicted if the contents are in tha mal equilibrium.

4. Experimental Details

4.1. Description of Apparatus

For th e present experimen ts a D ewar of 39.7-1 iter capacity (excluding volume in the supporting neck) was constructed from type 304 stainless steel as shown in figure 2. Stainless stecl was selected , because of its low thermal conductivity, to reduce vessel wall conduction and thereby minimize effects of t he wall on the temperature gradient in th e contents. The en t ire assembly with the excep t ion of the upper 12 in . of supporting tu bes was sub­merged in liquid nitrogen during the measllI'emen ts. Twelve difference thermocouples (gold plus 2.1 at. percen t cobalt ve rsus copper) were installed on th e outside of a micarta t u be at the vertical cen te rline and spaced as shown in figu re 2. Thermocouple 12 was placed on the sensing bulb of a h elium vapor pressure thermometer and was used as the reference for the 11 remaining thermocouples. The t hermo­electric emf was measured with a precision \~ enner potentiometer. The thermocouples and temperatu re measuring equipmen t were capable of an accuracy of better than ± 0.1 ° K in the range of absolu te temperatu res measured. A res istance wire heater wa s spiraled a round the top and bottom hemispheres to allow a known and concen trated heat flux to be applied .

In experiments 4,5 , and 6, four rod s of electrolytic­tough-pi tch copper 25-in. long having a combined cross-sectional a rea of 0.258 sq in . were placed ver tically in the D ewar to redu ce the temperature gradient.

f Kova r seal

I Pumping line, vacuu m gage, and seal-of f valve

691/4"

Enti re outer su rface of inner shell covered With aluminum foil

I

f 3/4" coupl;ng

Vent

3/4" c.d . • . 020" wal l ~ 304 5.S.lube

6 ·

- 2 1/8" c.d. x 1/8" wall Cu lube

- 12" o. d. x .072" wall #304 5.S.

hemispherical heads

" t-2:':"'-- __ Thermocouple spacing - No's I thr u 12

," , ,"

12"0.d . ~ .072" wall x 14" long '"30 4 5.5 shell

3/8" o.d. Micarta lube -Ift"l---~I High vacuum

I 44 Oh m Nichrome heater

Vapor pressure thermometer bulb

14" o. d . x 1/4" wall "30 4 5.5.

ASME heads

FIGURE 2. Dewar schematic showing thermocouple positions.

21

4.2. Experimental Procedure

Th e Dewar was filled to various IC\Tcls wilh liquid helium . Th e liquid level was then measured by means of an electrical resistance probe [6] inserted through th e neck. The liquid evaporat ion rate wa measured prior to closing the vent to determine the heat input. A correction was calcula ted for the increased heat input down the neck in th e 110n­venting condition . The system was then sealed and periodic pressure and temperature readings were obtained.

5. Data and Discussion

Six experimen ts were performed as shown in table 1. In each experim ent, the starting conditions were saturated liquid and vapor at 12.2 psia.

Experi­ment 1'\[0.

T ABLE :I

Tota l lVfcasurcd 'J1hcorct-Liquid SpeCifi c heat time to iea l time volume volume input 50 pSia to 50

psia

l':O LCS

----------------1-----%f uU l / ky w hr hr 1 ______ ___ 99 7.8 0. 10 15. '1 23.2

2 . ________ 82 9. 23 . 10 27.5 00.8 3 ___ _ . _. __ 71 10.5 .54 .1 2.5 13.2 Coneen Ira led heat

in pu L at bottom. L ____ _ ._. 97.5 7.93 .10 24 . 6 29.4 Copper rods

insta lled. 5 ___ __ . ____ 78 9. 65 . 10 63. '1 65.7 Do. (,--- ------ 81 9. 32 . 10 55. r. 54.8 Do.

Experim ents 1 through 5 were terminated afte r a pressure buildup to approximately 70 psia. Experi­ment 6 was continued until the pressure r eached 160 psia .

Figure 3 show a bsolu te temperature as a fun ct ion of ve rtical posit ion in the D ewar and Dewar pressure for experiments 1 through 5. Temperature read i.ng , tak en after Lite vapor press ure thennometer reference reach ed t he critical temperature (app rox 5.20 Ie) such as shown for experinlents 3 and 5, a rc less accurate because t he a bsolute value of th e reference has been extrapolated for values above 5.20 K. Since the majority of data in experiment 6 is above the critical poin t, tern perature read iu gs a rc no t shown.

In each case, essentially all of the temperature gradien t existed in the upper one third of the test D ewar. Those t hermocouples not plo tted were essen tially a,t the reference tempera ture throughout the tes t. Thermoco uple No. 1 is probably greatly influenced bY the h eat transferred down the fill tube and is 'therefore of questionable value.

Dewar pressure as a function of change in internal cnerg~r (6 U ) is shown in figure 4 for all six experi­mell ts. Th e calcula ted thermal equilibrium pressure versus 6 U is also shown for comparison .

T empera t ure stratification was quite pronounced in all of the experimen ts performed withou t the copper rods (see figs. 3 and 4). Comparison of experiments 1 and 2 indicate an increasing tem­perature gradient and pressure rise deviation from the calculated thermal equilibrium pressure with in-

'" w a:

14

12

10

4 o

14

12

:::> 10 >--

" a: w "-::;; w >--

4 o

14

12

10

4 o

i

T -~ C-I

I

....-I-'

/ ....-f-4 5

I ...-:: r--:: -:::.. i--- 6 R EF

20 40 60 80

EXPERIMENT I

Te ·1

i/ /

2

il V 4

if f/ 5

....... f- REF

,,---~

20 40 60 80

EXPERIMENT 3

r-t-- KI~ -~ 2->-~ ~ REF

~V

20 40 60

PRESSURE, psi a

EXPERIMENT 5

80

FIG URE 3

14

12

10

4 o

14

12

10

4 o

Te-I

./ f-

I I -Tc-2

I--- =3 I--:: f- ......-_4

I, V ....-,..-5

If/, V 6

III /" 7

VI y ~ ...-:: REF

20 40 60

EXPERIMENT 2

(\

Te ·1

"---....- 2,3

- - REF

20 40 60

PRESSURE, psio

EXPERIMENT 4

80

80

creasing specific volumes. Experiment 3 when com­pared with the trend of experiments 1 and 2 shows that, as would be expected, a concentrated heat input to the bottom of tbe dewar resul ts in increased convection and therefore reduces the temperature gradient. .

The excellent heat conducting characteristic of the copper rods is evidenced by the virtual elimina­tion of temperature gradients in experiments 4 and 5. The experimental pressure rise in experiments 4,5, and 6 is shown to be in close agreement with the calculated thermal equilibrium curve.

Some of the nonequilibrium pressure rise curves in figure 4 appear to intersect the thermal equilibrium curves. This phenomenon may not be entirely un­expected. As the helium increases in temperature and pressure, the system changes from a two phase gas and liquid system to a single phase fluid. If the single phase fluid was an ideal gas, obeying the ideal gas law, and therefore having a constant specific heat (0.), it can be shown mathematically that a temperature gradient would not affect the rate of

22

0 .;;; 0-

w" a: :::> <f) <f)

w 0: "-

.0 EXPERIMENTALy /

V / / /

60

0 ~~~I~~:I~M ~ r------

// Or

EXPERIMENT I

4 60

60

40

20

EXPERIMENT 3

8 0

1 1 ,/

60 EXPERIMENTAL ......: ./

1./'1 / THERMAL

- 7 V EQUILlBRI~ -? f---r

40

20

1

EXPERIMENT 2

60 j

60 EXPERIMENTAL ~/

~/I THERMAL

40 / EOUILIBRIUM

/ 20 / /

c::. V

EXPERIMENT 4

160

1

20 1 ~ f--- f-

THERMAL I f/ EQUILIBRIUM ............ V

.0

40

I-"" o

jOules/g

.A" ./ ""EXPER IMENTAL

~ ~ 1 1

10

EXPERIME NT 6

FIGURE 4

pressure rise in the single phase regime. Thus, it appears that the pressure rise deviation resulting from temperature stratification is possibly a result of the nonideality of the fluid. Consequently , one might specula,te that a nonequilibrium pressure rise curve may intersect 01' become asymptotic to the eq uilibrium pressure rise curve at some pressure or pressures which would depend upon the magnitude and distribution of the temperature gradient. This speculation is supported by (a) the knowledge that at pressures and temperaturE's somewhat higher than those investigated, helium tends to obey the ideal gas law, and (b) the behavior of the compressibility factor of helium [4] as shown in figure 5. The com­pressibility factor Z is defined as PF/nRT. In Lhe constant volume processes under consideration here

P=OZT (4)

where 0 is a cons tan t and Z is a function of tempera­ture and pressure. Figure 5 illustrates that at lower pressures Z generally increases with increasing tem­perature at anyone pressure. At higher values of pressure, the situation is reversed; that is, Z de­creases wi th increasing temperature at anyone pressure.

I I -3.5 I I

I I I i /." K I II .. ~ I h 6

T I / 7

/ ~ .y//9 J I / 7: /// / / ~~ '~ /' ..----" .12

~-tY// /:::-T ~4 _-:r--/ I /y.-t::,/ /' .----~ I~'-IB //~~I --:::::::;

~=- 20 'K~

/ ~~~ ' ~---+-.

2.5

Z 2

1.5

I - .. + - i ,\'b tp' I I I Y I I

~ ~

I

.5

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 PRESSURE> atm

FI GUR E 5. Compressibili ty Jacl or Z Jar heliwn gas.

The point of intersection may also depend to a lesser exten t upon the variation of ((Iv) with temperature and pressure. Even though th e neces­sary thermodynamic data arc now available, a suit­able method of computation of the nonequilibrium pressure rise that would be expected in a container which will suppor t temperature gradients has noL yet been attempted.

23

------_.- -_ ..

6. Conclusion

The presence of a good hea t conciuct ing ma terial appears to be the most satisfacto ry meLhod of eliminating temperature gradients and unneces­sarily high pressures as well as allowing a pressure rise prediction to be made with the aid of figure 1. It is to be expected that both geometry and the distri­bution of heat input will influence the stratification tel1clel1cies of a D ewar. The use of high condu c­tivity construction materials such as ahmlinum and copper will greatly reduce this tendency . V cry large D ewars may require additional material to conduct h eat into the center of the helium mass .

7. References

[1) R . E. Brown, Economic and other aspects of t he distri­t ribu tion of Navy helium in liqu id form, Proc. of Cryogenic Eng. Co nf. , Bould er, Colo. (Aug. 1957) .

[2) G ,·enier, Phys. R ev. 83, 598 (1951). [:3) Ubbihm, Ph ysica l3, 629 (1947). [4) D . B. Ma nn a nd R . B. Stewarl, Th erm ody na mi c prop­

e rt ies of h elium at low t emperatures a lld high pressures, N BS T ech . Note 8 (PB1 51:367) (19.59).

l5) W. H . Keeso m, 11eliu l1l , p . 2:36 (E lse vier, ~ew York , K. Y., 1942) .

[6) R. B. Scott, Cryogeni c engin eerin g, p. 246 (D . Van Nost ra nd Co., In c., Xe \\· York, ~.Y. , 1959) .

BOU LDEH, COL O. (P aper 64C l - 20)