36
Author: Mehroz Ahmad Malkera

TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt

  • Upload
    asad

  • View
    75

  • Download
    10

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt

Author: Mehroz Ahmad Malkera

Page 2: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt

To analyze a log-file, the analyzer must have a complete know how of the data collection.

Page 3: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt

Although there are many things to note during the log-file analysis but they can be summarized under different topics:

Coverage AnalysisQuality AnalysisHandover AnalysisDrop Call Analysis

Page 4: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt
Page 5: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt

Doing coverage analysis from log-files usually we come across following problems:

Low Rx_Level Lack of Dominant Server Sudden Decrease in Rx_Level Almost same Rx_Level Drop call due to Bad Coverage Access Failures

Page 6: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt

In areas where there are few sites and too many different types of terrain structures like hills or obstacles those stopping the line of sight to the broadcasting signal, there might be a lot of coverage holes or places with insufficient signal level.

Page 7: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt

Signals of more than one cell can be reaching a spot with low level causing ping pong handovers. This might happen because the MS is located on the cell borders and there is no any best server to keep the call.

Page 8: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt

Tunnel Effect:

Engineer may notice sudden decrease on signal level when analyzing the log files. This will result in excessive number ofhandovers. Before suspecting anything else, check if the test was performed on a highway and that particular area was a tunnel or not. Signal level on the chart will make a curve rather than unstable changes. Tunnel effect will most likely result in ping pong handovers.

Page 9: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt

The network needs big optimization work when there are too many cells having overlapping coverage. This will cause quality problems because of frequency reuse and immediate action to optimize cell coverage should be taken. Other cells else than the one that suppose to serve at that particular area should be coverage reduced by power reductions, downtilts or other configuration changes.

Page 10: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt

Call is dropped because of poor coverage. The signal level goes down below the minimum signal level that system could carry on. Remember this minimum level is much lower than RX Access Minimum Level.

Page 11: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt

Access failures can happen because of low level below ACCMIN, bad quality or blocking in the target cell, or hardware failures. If you get a blocked call message during call set–up, it is because the signal leveling the cell you are trying to make call set–up is below ACCMIN which prevents MS to access the cell. ACCMIN is generally set to –104dBm depending on sensitivity level of equipments and is referred during call set–up. A low value of ACCMIN means that the coverage in idle mode is improved at the expense of the risk of having an increased number of call set–up failures.

Page 12: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt
Page 13: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt

While doing the quality analysis in a log-file, one comes across different cases:

BER & FER Bad Quality due to Signal Strength (FER is BAD) Bad Quality due to Signal Strength (FER is OK) SQI Collusion of MA list causing low C/I Interference

Page 14: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt

BER Stands for Bit Error Rate FER stands for Frame Erasure Ratio

The BER and FER caused by the radio network is the most important speech quality degradation factors. The BER and frame erasure ratio (FER) are dependent on a number of factors such as fading and interference. The degradation can be minimized by using the radio network features DTX, Power control and Frequency hopping.

Page 15: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt

As the signal strength drops down, the quality of the call becomes worse being effected by interference or fading or both. Consequently the system becomes weaker to handle the interference. Notice that not only Rx Quality is bad, but also FER is high. SQI is still within acceptable limits. That’s why we check all RX Quality, FER and SQI when analyzing interference problems. System will face bad RX Quality, drop calls and ping pong handovers in such environments.

Page 16: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt

The difference of this case from the previous is only the difference in FER. Signal strength is also bad in this, but FER is still fine which means there is no obvious interference in the area. The area in this case should most probably be a flat area without any obstacles to create reflection and the site density should not be dense or re–use of frequencies is good to prevent any co–channel interference.

Page 17: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt

SQI, Speech Quality Index is another expression when Quality is concerned.However, the RxQual measure is based on a simple transformation of the estimated average bit error rate, and two calls having the same RxQual ratings can be perceived as having quite different speech quality. One of the reasons for this is that there are other parameters than the bit error rate that affects the perceived speech quality.

A short, very deep fading dip has a different effect on the speech than a constant low bit error level, even if the average rate is the same.

The TEMS Speech Quality Index, which is an estimate of the perceived speech quality as experienced by the mobile user, is based on handover events and on the bit error and frame erasure distributions. Extensive listening tests on real GSM networks have been made to identify what type of error situations cause poor speech quality. By using the results from the listening tests and the fullinformation about the errors and their distributions, it is possible to produce the TEMS Speech Quality Index. The Speech Quality Index is available every 0.5 second in TEMS and predicts the instant speech quality in a phone call/radio–link in real–time.

Page 18: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt

The collusion of frequencies with neighboring cells MAIO list frequencies become more significant with dropping signal level. To prevent this kind of interference, MAIO lists of neighboring cells should be properly planned or MAIO step could be used.

Page 19: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt

There are two types interferences usually faced during the drive test: Co-Channel Interference Interference created by same frequencies is Co-Channel Interference. It is rarely faced in any network.

Adjacent Channel Interference Interference created by adjacent frequencies is called Adjacent Channel Interference. There are few cases in any network regarding this kind of interference.

Interference can cause harm to network by creating drop calls, bad quality patches, voice distortion etc.

Page 20: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt
Page 21: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt
Page 22: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt

Hand Over contributes to one of the main KPIs in any network. Four main kinds of handovers take place in the networks: Intra- Cell Handovers Intra-BSC Handovers Inter-BSC Handovers Inter-MSC Handovers

All the above handovers do follow the HO algorithm. HO algorithm in different vendors systems or even in operators using the same equipment could be different. In TEMS following Layer-3 messages contribute to Handover.

Sys Info Type 5 Sys Info Type 6 Measurement Reports Handover Command Handover Access Handover Complete

Page 23: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt

TYPES OF HANDOVER

Power Budget Handover (value depends upon PGBT HO Margin) Level Handover (value set -95dBm for DL & -105dBm for UL) Quality Handover (value set to 3.2% to 6.4% for both DL & UL) Interference Handover (value set to -80dBm for both DL & UL) Umbrella Handover (value set to -80 to -90dBm & PGBT Margin to max.) MS distance Handover (value set to max. by default) Intra-Cell Handover Rapid Field Handover (value set to -110dBm by default) Directed Retry Handover

Page 24: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt

Reasons for handover failure could be unavailable time slots because of high traffic, congestion, low signal strength or bad quality on target cell. Handover can be failed because of hardware problems in target cells –more likely TRX or time slot problems. Doing the HO analysis, one faces the following problems:

Late Handovers Ping-Pong Handovers Missing Neighbor Relation T3124 Expiry Neighbor Cell in another BSC/MSC

Page 25: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt

There will be such cases that you will notice handover process taking place a little late. There could be couple of reasons to that. First thing to check will be handover margins between the neighbors. If margins for level, quality or power budget handovers are not set correctly, handover will not take place at the right time. If margins are too much, handover will happen late, vice versa. If umbrella handover is enabled between two neighbors, you will notice that the small site will still keep the traffic although the level of umbrella cell id too much higher. This is due to HO Level Umbrella RX Level which is set to some definite level.

Page 26: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt

Ping-Pong Handovers take place due to following reasons:• MS moving in Zig Zag direction between the cells.• Incorrect HO Margins• lack of dominancy• Too many overlapping regions

Page 27: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt

If a handover is not performed to a neighbor cell that seems to be best server, there is a possibility of a missing neighbor relation. This will happen with sudden appearance of strong cell in the neighbor list just after a handover.

Page 28: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt

T3124 is the timer which is started when the Ho reference is sent in the HO access burst. HO failure is faced when this timer is expired which means that either the burst is not sent properly or not recognized at the other end.

Shown in the “Additional Information Message” in Mode Reports

Page 29: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt

You will always observe handover problems in BSC borders, because neighbor relations in these cases need extra attention. When the neighbor is in another BSC, the neighbor needs to be defined as an external cell in neighboring BSC with correct CGI, BCCH, BSIC and power related parameters. This must also be like this on the other way to have a mutual neighbor relation. If the neighboring cell belongs to a different MSC, the cell needs to be defined as an outer cell in neighboring MSC with correct CGI and MSC name/address. This must also be like this on the other way to have a mutual neighbor relation.

Page 30: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt
Page 31: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt

If the radio link fails after the mobile sends the Service Connect Complete Message then it is considered a dropped call. General reasons for drop calls are as follows:

o Drop Call due to Low Signal Strengtho Drop Call due to Bad RX Qualityo Drop Call due to Not–happening Handovero Drop Call due to Interference

Page 32: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt

Low signal strength in any area can be a cause for the drop call. The signal level goes down below the minimum signal level that system could carry on. Remember this minimum level is much lower than RX Access Minimum Level to prevent on–going call from dropping.

Page 33: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt

Sometimes the level is good or in the satisfactory range but the call is dropped because of the degraded trend of Rx quality. The degradation in this case is caused by the ping pong handovers between different cells.

Page 34: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt

Sometimes the call is dropped due to not happening hand over. This case is faced when there is problem in the neighbor definitions of any cell, BSC or any MSC. The MS moves on & the cells other than the serving cell are not properly defined as neighbors then the call will be dragged until it crosses the max TA value & the call is dropped.

Page 35: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt

One of the reasons for the drop calls is interference also. It might be co-channel & might be adjacent channel.

Page 36: TEMS LOG-FILE ANALYSIS.ppt

GOOD QUESTION !!!!!!!NEXT QUESTION !!!!!!!!