Tennis World International n° 6

®

www.tennisworldsa.comIssue number 6 | R39,95 including VAT

ISSN 2075-6526

SOUTH AFRICA

®TennisWorld

Monte CarloThe Return of Rafa

Desert Storm How Ljubicic Conquered Indian Wells

On her way to the top An exclusive inteview with Caroline Wozniacki

The Road to Roland Garros Why Roma Rules

The Comeback KingRoddick Rocks Miami

The Calm before the storm...

The clay holds many uncertainties for everyone, but more so for Roger than Rafa

The clay court season has all the necessary ingredients for high drama, especially now that Rafael Nadal is back to his best. He looked good in Indian Wells and Miami – fit, fast and fearsome – but couldn’t quite make it to the final. However, it gave him the ideal preparation and confidence for his clay court campaign. He got off to the perfect start at Monte Carlo, losing only 14 games en route to the championship – a truly incredible feat! It’s been nearly a year since we’ve seen Nadal biting a trophy, and it’s good to have him back in the winner’s circle. He truly owns the Monte Carlo event now, having won it for the past six years.

Nadal looks set to dominate the red dirt once again, and while this has always been a problem for Roger Federer, it could be particularly annoying this year. You see, with Nadal being ranked number three he could potentially meet Federer in the semi-finals of Roland Garros and the events leading up to it. It’s been many years since these two players contested anything other than the final of a tournament, and it will be sad if the climax of the competition is in the match preceding the final.

I was happily surprised by the victories of Ivan Ljubicic and Andy Roddick at Indian Wells and Miami, as I am sure many other people were. Nobody expected that these two would rise to the top at those prestigious events, but they truly deserved it! Roddick really seems to have changed both his game and his attitude, and I hope that this new fire will make him competitive for one of the top three spots in the rankings. It’s certainly going to be a very interesting couple of months.

As far as local tennis goes, South Africa is of course preparing for two major events – the Federation Cup and the Davis Cup. In Davis play we will face Finland, which is going to be very tough even though it is a home tie. The SA Fed Cup team is particularly young this year, and playing in Armenia is going to be a great experience for all of the players. The selectors are really looking to the future by opting for the youngsters, and I think it will pay off in the long run. One of the ladies going to Armenia is Chanel Simmonds, and she was kind enough to give us an interview. She told us a lot about herself and her game, and you can check it out on page 73.

The quality of tennis in South Africa is definitely improving, and SATA is working hard to get more and more tournaments in the country. This will not only improve the amount and quality of the courts, but also encourage more players to get involved at a competitive level. We at Tennis World are also doing our best to make tennis as popular as possible in this beautiful country!

As always, please send your comments and suggestions to [email protected]. We love hearing from you! Also be sure to check out our website at www.tennisworldsa.com, where you’ll find the latest tennis news as well as our “Guess the Winner” competition, where you can win some fabulous prizes.

Until next time, happy reading!

FedericoFederico Coppini [email protected]

TENNIS WORLD SOUTH AFRICAPublished by Matchball Tennis

EDITOR & DIRECTORFederico Coppini [email protected]

CONTRIBUTORSPietie Norval, Danie Morkel, Matt Traverso, Jaco Burger, Wendy Chadwick (SATA)

COLLABORATIONTennis World SA is published in collaboration with Matchpoint Tennis Magazine (Italy). Special thanks to director Daniele Azzolini and his editing team. Matchpoint Tennis Magazine, Via Santa Giovanna Elisabetta 36/F 00189 Roma Tel: + 00 39 063 638 2189 [email protected]

Nelize Ernst – Subscriptions & Advertising Sales

COPY AND CONTENT EDITOR: Philip MaréCREATIVE: Simone “Fela” Micheletti

BUSINESS DETAILSMatchballTennis (Pty) Ltd85 Jonkershoek RoadStellenbosch, South Africa [email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

MARKETING & PRNicolette Booyens [email protected]

www.tennisworldsa.com

Editor’s Letter In thisissue

Caroline Wozniack

Miami Masters

Indian Wells

Splinter Cell Conviction - The Witcher - Alan Wake - Lost Planet 2 - Super Mario Galaxy 2

Alpha Protocol - Dead to Rights Retribution - Medal of Honour - Bodycount -Metroid Other M

Vanquish - True Crime - Split/Second - F1 2010 - Blur - Modnation Racers -Need for Speed World

Company 2 - Command & Conquer 4 - Yakuza 3 - Red Steel 2 - MotoGP 09/10 - Warhammer 40k:

Chaos Rising - Supreme Commander 2 - Resonance of Fate - Super Monkey Ball Step & Roll

ALSOIN THIS

EA takes on Modern Warfare 2...

Who will win the war?BATTLEFIELD

BAD COMPANY 2

ALAN WAKE

GAMESWORLD

GAMESWORLD

W W W . G A M E S W O R L D S A . C O M

R 2 9 , 9 5 I N C L V A T

GOD OF WAR III

We cast a light on Remedy

Entertainment’s upcoming

thriller

SUPER MARIO

GALAXY 2

Square Enix tries to appeal

to casual gamers with some

controversial innovations

He’s angry, he’s violent and he wants revenge:

Kratos is back and better than ever!

FINALFANTASY XIII

Xbox 360 , P layStat ion 3 , PC , Wi i , DS , PSP, iPhone , On l ine , Hardware , Retrogaming , Mov ies

The original was called the

best Mario ever - Will the

sequel be better?

ISSUE

GA

ME

SW

OR

LD

SA

02

SA's NEW GAMING MAGAZINEAVAILABLE NOW

www.gamesworldsa.com

4 TENNISWORLD SA TENNISWORLD SA 5

08 38 22

68

40 14

73

28ContentsTennisWorld SA #6

© 2010 TWSA. Permission Required to re-use any information in printed or digital format.

NEWS

14 Monte Carlo Masters 100022 Miami Masters 100028 Indian Wells Masters 100040 Rome Masters 100081 South African Tennis Association (SATA)

PLAYER FEATURES

19 Tomaz Bellucci20 Tomas Berdych25 Andy Roddick33 Philipp Petzschner36 Bethanie Mattek-Sands38 Marin Cilic

FEATURES

60 Tennis Without Slams65 Andre Agassi Book Review66 Lewis Carroll’s Tennis Legacy68 Mirza Wedding

INTERVIEWS

8 Caroline Wozniacki70 Patrick Mouratoglou73 Chanel Simmonds76 Kevin Curren

PRO TALK

49 My Africa51 Mental Preparation – Service52 Shoulder Injuries53 The Federer Volley54 Physical Recovery78 SA Davis Cup Preview79 SA Fed Cup Preview

RANKINGS

44 ATP Rankings46 WTA Rankings96 SA Rankings

MISC

58 Subscriptions


Amer Sports Europe Services GmbH / WilsonHainbuchenring 9, 82061 Neuried, Germanywilson.com

©2010 wilson sporting goods co.all rights reserveddtp + print: na adwork

Amer Sports, BLX, FX, Triad Technology, Six-‐One, W and Wilson are trademarks which distinguish the fine products of Wilson Sporting Goods or Amer Sports Deutschland GmbH.

Trademarks advertised other than those of Wilson Sporting Goods Co. are properties of their respective companies.

Amer Sports Europe Services GmbH 2009

number 1 in

tennis*

*Based on Sports Marketing Survey (Jan -‐ Sept 2009), Yano Keizai research (May -‐ June 2009) and other available global sales data for all tennis equipment.

f e e l i s e l emen t a l

TENNISWORLD SA 9

From Challenger to Contender

There It’s been an extraordinary six months for Caroline Wozniacki. In that period the Danish teenager has

reached the US Open final and risen to world number two. David Cox caught up with her at the Miami Masters to find out more about this talented youngster.

Regular followers of the tour will have been aware of Wozniacki’s potential since she was thrust into the spotlight four years ago, winning junior Wimbledon at just 15. Her solid counter-punching game continued to serve her well on the main tour as she be-came established in the world’s Top 20, but not everyone believed she had what it took to reach the very highest echelons of world tennis. That is, until recently.

Wozniacki was one of a cluster of highly tal-ented teenagers in and around the world’s top ten, hoping to make a breakthrough and reach a Grand Slam final. That group includ-ed her close friend Vika Azarenka.

Many thought Azarenka would be the one to step up but during a rollercoaster of a fortnight in New York, Wozniacki battled her way past French Open champion Svetlana Kuznetsova and American starlet Melanie Oudin to take on Kim Clijsters in the final. Although she lost, Wozniacki had made her mark on the world stage.

“Since the US Open I have been more and more recognized, not only in Denmark but all over the world,” she said. “Being in the spot-

“I like all surfaces, but if I’d have to pick one, I’d say hard court or

clay court. “

8 TENNISWORLD SA

Caroline W

ozniacki


light is very nice but has its pitfalls as well.”

Clijsters’ fairytale run was one of the feel-good stories of the sporting year, but her great run had a dark undertone for the WTA tour. Had her success exposed a worrying lack of strength and depth on the women’s circuit?

Wozniacki doesn’t think so. “Having Kim back is great for the game. I actually think that women’s tennis will improve because the competition is getting tougher. Kim is an extraordinary athlete, and always has been,

so I am glad to have her back on Tour.”

There was more controversy when a string of injuries affected the year-end WTA Cham-pionships. This lead to widespread calls for the season to be shortened. However, Woz-niacki remains pragmatic, accepting it is part and parcel of the life of a tennis player.

“I think that tennis players have a really hec-tic schedule, which is demanding,” she says. “I would prefer a shorter season, but you know, I am not the one in charge of deciding. I do what I do best, play tennis.”

“I started playing at around age 4 or so.

My dad taught me. “

12 TENNISWORLD SA

Q: When did you start playing tennis and who was your first coach?I started playing at around age 4 or so. My dad taught me.

Q: Does anyone else in your family play tennis?We are a very athletic family. When my broth-er started playing tennis, I picked it up as well. He turned out to be a soccer player, I chose tennis.

Q: When did you realize you wanted to become a professional tennis player?I loved the game instantly. I always pushed my dad to play more and more with me. Pretty early on, I already wanted to play competi-tively.

Q: How many hours do you spend on the court every day? And in the gym?I practice twice a day, two hours per practice session, and usually an hour or so fitness. I also do boxing as cross-training, so I box for an hour every other day.

Q: Can you talk us through a typical day when you’re playing a tournament?

I usually wake up three hours before playing. I have a good breakfast then I go to the courts to warm-up. I often finish warming up an hour or so before the match. I always stretch and activate myself before stepping on court to play. After the match, it is always the same, cool-down, interviews, then a massage or I am seeing the physio. I always get a good din-ner with family or friends.

Q: What’s your pre-match routine? Any superstitions before you go out there?I like to keep myself well-fed and be ready to play. My warm-up routine is always the same, so is my cool down routine. I am not that superstitious really, I like to follow my own schedule and rituals but I am not too par-ticular about it.

Q: How do you cope with the feelings af-ter losing important matches?Because I always want to win, it sometimes is hard to lose a battle. But I try to learn from each match I play and try to stay objective about it.

Q: How about the off-court stuff – favou-rite music to chill out to? How do you like

to relax when not competing?Music-wise, everything but rap and country. I like tunes that make me dance and get me pumped up. When I’m home I’m happiest shopping or grabbing dinner with friends in Copenhagen.

Q: Ideal holiday destination?Somewhere on a sandy beach with friends, jet skis and pretty sunsets!

Q: Back to the tennis, how would you de-scribe the strongest and weakest parts of your game?I am a fighter, I never give up. I need to im-prove my serve and I need to stay more ag-gressive. I am constantly working on my game though because I always find things that need to get better.

Q: Favourite surface ?I like all surfaces, but if I’d have to pick one, I’d say hard court or clay court.

Q: Most memorable tennis moment ? Either winning the Wimbledon Junior Cham-pionships a few years ago or playing the US Open final last year.

THE STABLES LODGEA warm & friendly Italian welcome!

The Stables Lodge is situated in an exclusive area of Stellenbosch, less than 5 minutes from

the picturesque town centre. ! e lodge o" ers panoramic views of the surrounding mountains, with accommodation in 6 comfortable en- suite rooms.All rooms are equipped with air-conditioning, co" ee/tea making facilities, Radio/CD players as well as towels for the pool. One self-catering unit is also available. We also o" er secure parking, a spacious public area, honesty bar with soft drinks and snacks as well as wireless internet.

Enjoy a leisurely breakfast before heading out to explore the famous wine lands, or discover the area through many available excursions and day trips! Should you wish to relax then our quiet and welcoming garden around our lovely swimming pool is just the place.A beautiful atmosphere with a fusion of Italian and African styles, make this a" ordable stay one to be repeated!

Italian and English spoken. German in progress!

www.thestables-lodge.com | [email protected] Stables Lodge | 85 Jonkershoek Road | Stellenbosch | South AfricaTel/fax +27 (0)21 8864326 | GPS coordinates S 33° 56’ 5.18’ E 18° 53’ 6.74’


He left all of his opponents broken and bruised on his way to the final, where he absolutely destroyed his good friend Fernando Verdasco. Yet he humbly protests: "I do not expect to win always, even on clay."By our correspondent in Monte CarloUbaldo Scanagatta

This year’s Monte Carlo Masters 1000 tournament was all about two numbers: 14 and 6. On his rampant run to the title,

Rafael Nadal lost only 14 games in total. To put that into perspective, his opponent in the final, Fernando Verdasco, lost ten games in just one match against Tomas Berdych in the third round. The other number is how many times Nadal has now won the principality’s tennis title, all of those victories coming back-to-back. He is the first player in the Open era to achieve this feat.

Yes, ladies and gentleman, Rafael Nadal is back, and some would say he is better than ever. That might be overstating it a bit, but it’s hard not to be excited about the brutal display of power that the Spaniard put on at the Monte Carlo Country Club. At the very least, many of the doubts that had been plaguing the king of clay for the past year have now been erased. Yet some still linger: none of his fiercest rivals were playing at the tournament. Roger Federer decided to skip the event, and Juan Martin Del Potro, Robin Soderling and Nikolay Davydenko all had to sit out due to injuries. The real test for Nadal will come when he faces one of them in a final, but until then this victory will keep him more than happy and, more importantly, confident. Besides, he ran into some of the

best clay specialists in the world on his way to the final. Juan Carlos Ferrero has already won two titles on the red stuff this year, and David Ferrer has won a title and made a final. Together these two represent the tour’s best clay players, and they were both mercilessly beaten into submission by the rabid Nadal. That will go some way to making up for the absence of some of the other top dogs.

Coming into the final nothing was certain, however. Verdasco had easily knocked out Novak Djokovic in the semi-finals, the player who many thought the favourite to win the tournament, and he is no slouch on clay. But from the very first game it was clear that Nadal was in no mood to cut his friend any sort of slack. He barely allowed the struggling Verdasco room to breathe, and the match quickly became a replay of their clash at Roland Garros in 2008, where Nadal mu-tilated Verdasco 6-1, 6-0, 6-2. But after the battle the two gladiators were friends again, with Verdasco hugging his countryman at the net. “I hope one day Rafa gets tired of win-ning here,” he said afterwards. Nadal was a little sheepish at the awards ceremony, say-ing “sorry for today” to the smiling Verdasco. Although it was a tough loss for Verdasco, he can console himself with the knowledge that he will move back into the Top Ten after the

tournament.

Nadal’s clay court travels have only started, however, and he still needs to defend his titles in Barcelona and Rome before he can break even for the year, but he likes his chances. “I [am] back to my best level [since] January,” Nadal said after the win. Of course in January the Spaniard won an exhibition event in Abu Dhabi, where he beat Robin Soderling in the final. “And here probably was one of [my] best [performances] on clay, one of my best levels on clay, sure.”Spain was certainly well represented throughout the week, with three of the four semi-finalists hailing from that country. The Spaniards are of course well known for their love of clay, and this can clearly been seen from their outstanding results at both at Monte Carlo and Roland Garros. Since 1993, 15 Spaniards have reached the final in the principality, with 10 emerging victorious. The numbers for the French Open are scarcely less impressive, with 14 finalists and 9 win-ners over the same period of time.

The Monte Carlo Masters 1000 tournament was, as always, a resounding success. Despite the inclement weather that plagued the region for the first few days, almost every session was sold out. While the crowds no

doubt enjoyed seeing Nadal back at his best, his utter domination did lead to a disappointing lack of excit-ing matches. The best contest of the week was probably between Juan Carlos Ferrero and Jo-Wilfried Tsonga, which the Spaniard won 6-1, 3-6, 7-5. Tsonga has never played his best tennis on clay, but during that match he showed that he might just be getting used to it. By his own admission he has big plans for the surface, and with the French Open on the horizon, he will surely want to make good progress before his home Slam. The overwhelming attendance for all the sin-gles matches was sadly not replicated on the doubles side of the draw, and the discipline’s continuing problems were accentuated by the fact that only a couple of hundred people saw the final between Daniel Nestor/Nenad Zimonjic and Mahesh Bhuphati/Max Mirnyi, which the latter duo won after Bhupati was forced to withdraw due to injury.

Monte Carlo Masters 1000

The Spanish ArmadaThe Spanish have dominated the Monte Carlo Masters.

Here’s what they’ve achieved since 1993:Year Champion Runner-up Score2010 [ESP] Rafael Nadal [ESP] Fernando Verdasco 6–0, 6–12009 [ESP]Rafael Nadal [SRB]!Novak Djokovic 6–3, 2–6, 6–12008 [ESP]!Rafael Nadal [SUI]!Roger Federer 7–5, 7–52007 [ESP]!Rafael Nadal [SUI]!Roger Federer 6–4, 6–42006 [ESP]!Rafael Nadal [SUI]!Roger Federer 6–2, 6–7(2), 6–3, 7–6(5)2005 [ESP]!Rafael Nadal [ARG]!Guillermo Coria 6–3, 6–1, 0–6, 7–52003 [ESP]!Juan Carlos Ferrero [ARG]!Guillermo Coria 6–2, 6–22002 [ESP]!Juan Carlos Ferrero [ESP]!Carlos Moyà 7–5, 6–3, 6–41998 [ESP]!Carlos Moyà [FRA]!Cédric Pioline 6–3, 6–0, 7–51997 [CHI]!Marcelo Ríos [ESP]!Alex Corretja 6–4, 6–3, 6-31996 [AUT]!Thomas Muster [ESP]!Albert Costa 6–3, 5–7, 4–6, 6–3, 6–21994 [UKR]!Andriy Medvedev [ESP]!Sergi Bruguera 7–5, 6–1, 6–31993 [ESP]!Sergi Bruguera [FRA]!Cédric Pioline 7–6(2), 6–0



Gasquet 4/10 The special effects were not enough to fill the gaps in his game, and the Frenchman ob-viously has a lot of work to do. There were glimmers of hope though, and he’ll be looking to regain at least some of his lost form before the French Open.

Seppi 6/10 Seppi didn’t technically “win” any matches during the week – he only reached the second round thanks to Olivier Rochus retiring in their opening match. He played well against Mon-tanes until the third set, but then he completely fell apart. This is the time of the year that he really needs to col-lect as many points as he can, because once the clay court season ends it’s only going to get harder for the Italian.

Verdasco 9/10 Finally, Fernando, finally! Af-ter reaching almost a dozen Masters Series 1000 quar-ter-finals without ever pro-gressing to the last four, the Spaniard goes one bet-ter and makes the final. His power and persistence saw him through the week, but un-fortunately it wasn’t enough against Rafa.

Nadal 9/10 Hurricane Nadal once again slammed into the Monte Carlo Country Club, sweeping away anyone who dared stand in its way. He looked like a man among boys, and made even the best clay courters of the year look like nervous juniors. After a year of waiting, the King of Clay has finally re-claimed his throne.

Murray 3/10Clay isn’t a good surface on which to be unsure of oneself, and Murray’s lack of confi-dence shone through for ev-eryone to see. With no power and even less heart, it was a listless performance from the Scot, perhaps the worst of the past two months – and that’s saying something.

Djokovic 5/10Firing Todd Martin didn’t ex-orcise any of the demons that are haunting Djokovic’s game. He made it to the semi-final, but not without several tan-trums and mini-meltdowns. Against Verdasco he played the same kind of tennis we’ve seen from him in the past months, and with a ton of points to defend in the next weeks, it’s not a good time for the Serb to start falling apart.

Ferrer 7/10Perhaps the best clay-court player we’ve seen this year af-ter Nadal, Ferrer is recaptur-ing some of the form that saw him reach the US Open semi-finals a couple of years ago. It’s unlikely that’s he’ll again climb as high in the rankings, but he’s still and handful on clay – and one of the only players to break Nadal’s serve the whole week.

Nalbandian 6/10Slowly but surely he’s getting back to where he was before his hip operation. He’s still not as fit as he needs to be and the consistency is lacking, but the Argentine is making real progress. Let’s hope he can stay healthy as he climbs back up the rankings.

Monte Carlo Scorecard

16 TENNISWORLD SA

Monte Carlo Masters 1000 Monte Carlo Masters 1000

Casinò

.

Monte Carlo Harbour

Cafè de Paris & Casinò.

Cafè de Paris


1D

JO

KO

VIC

, N

ov

ak

SR

BC

RO

LJ

UB

ICIC

, Iv

an

33

N. D

JO

KO

VIC

[1

]I.

LJ

UB

ICIC

[8

]2

BY

EB

YE

34

N. D

JO

KO

VIC

[1

]I.

LJ

UB

ICIC

[8

]3

SE

RR

A, F

lore

nt

FR

A6

2 6

36

3 7

6(3

)IT

AF

OG

NIN

I, F

abio

35

F. S

ER

RA

M. L

LO

DR

A4

RO

BE

RT

, S

tepha

ne

FR

A7

6(6

) 3

6 6

46

3 6

3F

RA

LL

OD

RA

, M

icha

el

36

N. D

JO

KO

VIC

[1

]D

. F

ER

RE

R [

11

]5

GU

LB

IS, E

rne

sts

LA

T6

4 6

46

0 7

6(4

)F

RA

CH

AR

DY

, Je

rem

y37

E. G

UL

BIS

A. G

OL

UB

EV

6C

HIU

DIN

EL

LI, M

arc

oS

UI

63

62

62

76

(2)

KA

ZG

OL

UB

EV

, A

ndre

y38

S. W

AW

RIN

KA

[1

3]

D. F

ER

RE

R [

11

]7

HA

NE

SC

U, V

icto

rR

OU

61

64

63

62

AU

SL

UC

ZA

K, P

ete

r39

S. W

AW

RIN

KA

[1

3]

D. F

ER

RE

R [

11

]8

WA

WR

INK

A, S

tan

isla

sS

UI

62

64

62

64

ES

PF

ER

RE

R, D

av

id40

N. D

JO

KO

VIC

[1

]D

. F

ER

RE

R [

11

]9

RO

BR

ED

O, T

om

my

ES

P6

2 6

37

5 7

6(1

)A

UT

ME

LZ

ER

, J

urg

en

41

T. R

OB

RE

DO

[1

2]

J. M

EL

ZE

R [

15

]10

ZE

BA

LL

OS

, H

ora

cio

AR

G6

3 6

36

3 6

2F

RA

MA

TH

IEU

, P

aul-H

enri

42

T. R

OB

RE

DO

[1

2]

P. P

ET

ZS

CH

NE

R11

TR

OIC

KI, V

ikto

rS

RB

64

63

76

(4)

62

ES

PG

AR

CIA

-LO

PE

Z, G

uill

erm

o43

V. T

RO

ICK

IP

. P

ET

ZS

CH

NE

R12

KU

BO

T, L

uka

sz

PO

L4

6 6

2 6

26

3 2

6 6

2G

ER

PE

TZ

SC

HN

ER

, P

hili

pp

44

D. N

AL

BA

ND

IAN

P. K

OH

LS

CH

RE

IBE

R13

NA

LB

AN

DIA

N, D

avi

dA

RG

63

64

63

64

BR

AB

EL

LU

CC

I, T

ho

ma

z45

D. N

AL

BA

ND

IAN

P. K

OH

LS

CH

RE

IBE

R14

BE

CK

, A

ndre

as

GE

R6

3 6

12

6 6

3 7

6(3

)G

ER

KO

HL

SC

HR

EIB

ER

, P

hili

pp

46

D. N

AL

BA

ND

IAN

P. K

OH

LS

CH

RE

IBE

R15

BY

E4

6 6

3 7

6(5

)6

2 6

1B

YE

47

M. Y

OU

ZH

NY

[7

]A

. M

UR

RA

Y [

3]

16

YO

UZ

HN

Y, M

ikh

ail

RU

SG

BR

MU

RR

AY

, A

nd

y48

17

CIL

IC, M

ari

nC

RO

FR

AT

SO

NG

A, J

o-W

ilfr

ied

49

M. C

ILIC

[4

]J

. T

SO

NG

A [

5]

18

BY

EB

YE

50

M. C

ILIC

[4

]J

. T

SO

NG

A [

5]

19

AN

DR

EE

V, Ig

or

RU

S6

7(4

) 6

1 6

47

6(5

) 7

5E

SP

AL

MA

GR

O, N

ico

las

51

I. A

ND

RE

EV

N. A

LM

AG

RO

20

BO

LE

LL

I, S

imo

ne

ITA

63

64

36

75

62

GE

RG

RE

UL

, S

imo

n52

A. M

ON

TA

NE

SJ

. F

ER

RE

RO

[9

]21

RO

CH

US

, O

livie

rB

EL

64

64

61

36

75

AU

ST

OM

IC, B

ern

ard

53

A. S

EP

PI

B. B

EC

KE

R22

SE

PP

I, A

ndre

as

ITA

76

(3)

00

Re

t'd6

4 6

2G

ER

BE

CK

ER

, B

enja

min

54

A. M

ON

TA

NE

SJ

. F

ER

RE

RO

[9

]23

MO

NT

AN

ES

, A

lbe

rtE

SP

76

(1)

36

60

63

64

ES

PG

RA

NO

LL

ER

S, M

arc

el

55

A. M

ON

TA

NE

SJ

. F

ER

RE

RO

[9

]24

BA

GH

DA

TIS

, M

arc

os

CY

P6

4 6

26

0 6

3E

SP

FE

RR

ER

O, J

ua

n C

arl

os

56

F. V

ER

DA

SC

O [

6]

R. N

AD

AL

[2

]25

BE

RD

YC

H, T

om

as

CZ

E6

3 6

7(4

) 6

06

4 6

2A

RG

MO

NA

CO

, J

ua

n57

T. B

ER

DY

CH

[1

0]

J. M

ON

AC

O [

14

]26

LO

PE

Z, F

elic

iano

ES

P6

3 6

17

5 7

5F

INN

IEM

INE

N, Ja

rkko

58

T. B

ER

DY

CH

[1

0]

M. B

ER

RE

R27

GIM

EN

O-T

RA

VE

R, D

anie

lE

SP

62

60

64

64

GE

RB

ER

RE

R, M

icha

el

59

R. G

AS

QU

ET

M. B

ER

RE

R28

GA

SQ

UE

T, R

icha

rdF

RA

62

46

62

61

64

KA

ZK

OR

OL

EV

, E

vge

ny

60

F. V

ER

DA

SC

O [

6]

R. N

AD

AL

[2

]29

BE

NN

ET

EA

U, Julie

nF

RA

57

63

62

60

61

NE

DD

E B

AK

KE

R, T

hie

mo

61

J. B

EN

NE

TE

AU

T. D

E B

AK

KE

R30

DO

LG

OP

OL

OV

JR

., O

leks

andr

UK

R6

4 5

7 6

26

3 7

5A

RG

SC

HW

AN

K, E

dua

rdo

62

F. V

ER

DA

SC

O [

6]

R. N

AD

AL

[2

]31

BY

E6

2 6

16

1 6

0B

YE

63

F. V

ER

DA

SC

O [

6]

R. N

AD

AL

[2

]32

VE

RD

AS

CO

, F

ern

an

do

ES

PE

SP

NA

DA

L, R

afa

el

64

ATP

, In

c.

© C

opy

right

2001

Ran

kR

an

kP

ts.

12

9F

ER

RE

RO

, Ju

an C

arlos

15

Win

ner

! 4

34,0

00

1000

23

10

BE

RD

YC

H, T

om

as

16

Fin

alis

ts! 2

03,0

00

600

34

11

FE

RR

ER

, D

avi

d17

Sem

i-F

inalis

ts! 1

03,4

50

360

49

12

RO

BR

ED

O, T

om

my

22

Quart

er

Fin

alis

ts! 5

3,0

00

180

510

13

WA

WR

INK

A, S

tanis

las

23

3rd

Round

! 2

7,5

00

90

612

14

MO

NA

CO

, Ju

an

24

2nd R

ound

! 1

4,5

00

45

713

15

ME

LZ

ER

, Ju

rgen

28

1st

Round

! 7

,650

10

814

16

BA

GH

DA

TIS

, M

arc

os

30

Mo

nte

-Carl

o R

ole

x M

aste

rsM

AIN

DR

AW

SIN

GL

ES

Mo

nte

Ca

rlo

, M

on

ac

o1

1-1

8 A

pri

l, 2

01

0R

ed

Cla

y!

2,5

43

,75

0

1

41

08

C

HA

MP

ION

R

afa

el N

AD

AL

[2]

60 6

1

Q

Q

13

1

1

12

1

5

7

3 W

C

4

F. V

ER

DA

SC

O [

6]

R. N

AD

AL

[2

]5

6

2 6

26

2 6

3

WC

W

C

Q

16

9

10

1

4

Q

Q

WC

Q

Q

6

2

Se

ed

ed

Pla

ye

rsS

ee

de

d P

lay

ers

Pri

ze M

on

ey

Lu

ck

y L

os

ers

Re

tire

me

nts

/W.O

.D

JOK

OV

IC, N

ova

kR

och

us,

Oliv

ier

(Low

er

Back

)N

AD

AL, R

afa

el

MU

RR

AY

, A

ndy

CIL

IC, M

arin

TS

ON

GA

, Jo

-Wilf

ried

VE

RD

AS

CO

, F

ern

ando

YO

UZ

HN

Y, M

ikhail

La

st

Dir

ec

t A

cc

ep

tan

ce

AT

P S

up

erv

iso

rLJU

BIC

IC, Iv

an

Llo

dra

, M

ich

ae

l 65

Ge

rry

Arm

str

on

g, T

ho

mas K

arl

be

rg

FO

LL

OW

LIV

E S

CO

RIN

G A

T w

ww

.AT

PW

orl

dT

ou

r.co

m

No, he’s not related to Monica Bellucci, if you really want to know. But on a good day, his tennis is almost as beau-

tiful as the gorgeous Ms. Bellucci. Almost. For some years now Thomaz Bellucci has been quietly working his way up the rankings, and recently he broke into the Top 30 for the first time, and has been hovering threateningly around there ever since. The 22-year old has a monstrous serve, and proved that his ground strokes can also be deadly when he beat both Fernando Gonzalez and Juan Monaco en route to his second career title in Santiago.

When wearing his hat, he almost seems like a left-handed version of world number two Novak Djokovic. Certainly on clay – Bellucci’s favourite surface – he would give the Serb a go for his money, although the two have never met on the court before. This compari-son would certainly have felt alien to Bel-lucci just over a year ago, when he was still playing qualifiers in order to gain entry into major tournaments. Now he is knocking on

the door of the Top 20.

Yet his talent has always been evident. In 2008, when Bellucci had only just cracked the Top 100, he walked onto Court Philippe Chatrier to face none other than Rafael Nadal. For a nail-biting first set, the Brazilian often looked capable of causing the greatest upset in the history of tennis, and although he went on to lose in straight sets, on that day he made his intentions clear: to compete with the very best players in the world for the sport’s highest honours. It’s worth remembering that 2008 was Nadal’s golden year at Roland Garros – he lost only four games to Federer in the final – so for Bellucci to score five games in a single set is an achievement not to be sneezed at.

That said, the Brazilian still has a long way to go, and he knows it. He’s yet to record a win over a Top 10 opponent (the closest he’s come is beating number 11 Fernando Gonzalez), and has performed poorly at Grand Slam level. The furthest he’s gone in a Major has been to

the second round, and his results in Masters Series 1000 tournaments has not been stel-lar either. His results away from his beloved clay have been lacking as well, and he really needs to start stepping out of his comfort zone if he is to truly succeed on a circuit that mostly features hard courts.

But if getting to the top is going to be a tough fight, he’s more than ready for it. He proved this much during his fourth round match against Nicolas Almagro in Key Biscayne. The contest came down to a tie-breaker in the third set, and Bellucci fought his vastly more experienced opponent every single step of the way, loudly exclaiming “vamos” at any given opportunity. Though he lost, the defeat didn’t dampen his spirits – it only spurred him on to work harder. Perhaps it is more than a coinci-dence that the last person to win the Chilean Open before it was moved to Vina del Mar was Gustavo Kuerten. The person who won it this year? Thomaz Bellucci. Perhaps fate has given a warning to the rest of the Tour.

The Other Bellucci


T omas Berdych is not even 25 years of age, but in tennis terms he’s already old. Tennis pundits had been aware of

his talent since he turned pro in 2002, but it wasn’t until 2004 that he stunned the world by defeating Roger Federer at the Athens Olym-pics. For the next two years phrases like “the new Safin” and “guaranteed number one” followed him around, and his win at the Paris Masters 1000 event seemed to confirm what everyone had been saying about the young man. He seemed destined for greatness.

His tennis was smooth and straightforward, a combination of power and grace that was a joy to watch. He soon built up a bevy of admirers, even among his peers, and tennis fans were excited about this new champion of tennis.

But just like the man they were comparing him to – the troubled Marat Safin – he would find things much harder than everyone had antici-pated. After Paris good results were hard to come by, and 2006 slipped by with the Czech not securing a single title. Though his ranking steadily hovered around the 20 mark, he found himself constantly faltering in big matches, especially in Slams, where he consistently failed to make it to the second week. Ques-tions also arose regarding his training regi-men, and though his ranking remained stable, his stock as a rising young star went into freefall. Soon very few people were paying him much attention, and the label of “the next Safin” fit uncomfortably well – except that he seemed to be reliving the Russian’s latter years, not his glory days.

The next three years saw Berdych reach five fi-nals, and he won three of them. But they were

small tournaments – Halle, Tokyo, Munich – not the Grand Slams that his talent had prom-ised seven years ago. Other perennial under-achievers started waking up and passing him by, most notably Robin Soderling. The Swede also had an enormous amount of talent, but had never quite lived up to it, but in 2009 he shocked the world by ousting Rafael Nadal from Roland Garros and reaching the final of that tournament. Since then he has gone from strength to strength, progressing unstoppably through the draws in major tournaments until he ran into the likes of Roger Federer (who beat him in three of last year’s Majors).

Maybe it was seeing Soderling do his talent justice that finally spurred Berdych into ac-tion. Maybe he had just had enough of be-ing “pretty good”, who knows? In the 2009 off-season he started training like a madman, greatly improving his footwork, consistency and attitude. Once again people started notic-ing the Czech, whispering that maybe he was finally ready to play to his full potential. All they needed was a sign, and in Miami they got one. It might not be a Slam, but it is one of the “mini Slams” (Indian Wells being the other), and Berdych sent out a clear message to the Tour when he sent Roger Federer pack-ing in one of the most competitive matches of the tournament: this time he means business.

It seems that Tomas Berdych has come full circle. In 2004 it was his victory against Fe-derer that alerted people to his young, raw talent, and now it is once again a win against the Swiss maestro that has grabbed people’s attention. This time, however, they will find a different Berdych – one who is more mature, fitter and finally ready to win. Come to think of it, maybe he isn’t so old after all…


Some players improve with age, just like a bottle of good wine. It’s rare but it does happen. Andre Agassi is perhaps the

best example – he won five Slams after the age of 28. Jimmy Connors is also worth a men-tion, since he won both Wimbledon and the US Open at the tender age of 30. So, at 28 years of age, Andy Roddick has at least some reason to think that the best years of his career are still ahead. After all, both of the examples we just mentioned were also American.

It seems almost unthinkable that just before the start of the American hard court swing, on the eve of the Indian Wells tournament, Roddick told his friend Justin Gimelstob that he didn’t feel particularly inspired. Fate has a funny sense of irony, since the American went on play some of the most inspired tennis of his life over the next two weeks.

Unfortunately, Roddick ran into a rabid Ivan Ljubicic in the final of Indian Wells, and even though he had his chances he eventually fell in two tight sets. But coming to Miami he had reason to believe that some good things were about to happen to him. It was in Miami, af-ter all, that he so impressed Pete Sampras in 2001 by beating him in straight sets. It was also here that he ended his 11-match losing streak against Roger Federer in 2008. “I have a feeling that Andy’s best years are ahead of him. This is why I have accepted to work with him. He wants to win Grand Slam titles, and he will succeed,” declared Larry Stefanki, who many regard as the best coach in the world. He has been working with Roddick for more than a year.

Perhaps the most important thing Stefanki has taught Roddick is to stay positive. The Ameri-can has a history of losing confidence in him-self during matches and after tough losses. The old Roddick would have fallen apart after that nail-biting loss to Federer at Wimbledon last year, but he kept his head high and pow-

ered through the tough times. Even tough ear-ly losses at both the US and Australian Opens couldn’t keep him down for long. In the Miami semi-final against Rafael Nadal – a player against whom Roddick has struggled might-ily in the past – A-Rod’s new self-confidence shone through for all to see. At the business end of a tight first set, he hit four consecu-tive forehand winners to get himself out of a huge spot of trouble. It was a match-changing moment, and he never looked back after that. There was no way he was going to lose to To-mas Berdych in the final – having come so far destiny was not about to let him down.

Indeed destiny might have had a hand in en-suring that Roger Federer stayed out of Rod-dick’s way on his way to the title. The Swiss maestro has won 19 of their 21 encounters, and Roddick would not have fancied his chances this time around, even in magical Miami. Luckily for him, Federer bowed out early for the second tournament in a row. Even

in the face of a truly awesome performance by Tomas Berdych, Federer seemed assured of a spot in the quarter-finals. He was ahead several times during the course of the match, and had a match point on his own serve, but somehow victory eluded him in the end. Fe-derer’s fans need not be alarmed, however, as the Swiss still played some pretty decent tennis, and was on the verge of victory numer-ous times in both the Indian Wells and Miami matches he eventually lost. He’s knocking on the door, which is more than can be expected after a lung infection and five weeks off.

Berdych’s superb form carried him through to the final, where he ran out of steam against an unstoppable Roddick. The Czech has been

showing some good progress over the past year, however, and he closing in on the kind of form that saw him win the 2005 Masters 1000 tournament in Paris. Hopefully he will do his talent justice by performing at this high level for the rest of the year.

As was the case in Indian Wells, it looked as if Nadal had been given a free pass to the fi-nals – and probably the trophy – by the early exits of Roger Federer, Novak Djokovic and Andy Murray. Unfortunately it was not to be, and he lost his nerve in the semi-final against Andy Roddick. He played a solid tournament though, and the clay court season is sure to be a profitable one if he can build on the success he enjoyed on hard courts in March.

Jo Wilfried-Tsonga, who Nadal beat in the quarter-finals, was also very impressive in Miami. He played some of the best tennis we’ve seen from him this whole season, and was very unlucky not to fare better against the Spaniard, having managed to carve out a number of break point opportunities. It looks like he is still getting used to his new rac-quet, and the lack of self-confidence he has with his new weapon showed at important times during the match. However, as the year progresses we should see much more of the Frenchman, especially during the clay season. While he is not at his best on the red dirt, he has stated that he wants to do great things on the surface. On the women’s side of things, we were de-lighted to see Kim Clijsters win her third title since her return and re-enter the Top 10. Al-though she received a brutal wake-up call at the Australian Open, where she won just one game against Nadia Petrova, in Miami she re-discovered the form that saw her win the US Open last year. The semi-final she contested against Justine Henin was by far the best match of the tournament, and it seems that the Henin-Clijsters rivalry is already back to the level it was some years ago. After leading comfortably in the deciding set, she allowed Henin to claw her way back into the contest and Clijsters had to win it in a tie-break in the end. “I don’t want to celebrate this victory be-cause I know well that the result could have been exactly reversed,” Clijsters said after the match, with cameras revealing a particularly downcast Justine Henin.

It was a pity that the final turned out to be such an anti-climax. With Venus Williams’ extended family streaming into her box for the contest, it looked as if she would fight tooth and nail for the title. Unfortunately she played some of the worst tennis we’ve seen all year, committing 30 unforced errors in just 15 games to lose the match in two easy sets. But we can forgive Williams this one slip-up, since it is just her second loss of the year. Af-ter being upset by Na Li in Australia, she went on to win in Dubai in Acapulco, and we’re sure that she will bounce back after this defeat.

The Old Kid on the Block



Just when it seemed as if Andy Roddick had left his best tennis days behind him, he has re-emerged as one of the tour’s most danger-ous players. Roddick has enjoyed being guided by some of the finest tennis minds on earth throughout his career, including the likes of Brad Gilbert and Jimmy Connors, but it was

Larry Stefanki who finally moulded Roddick into the best tennis player he could possibly be. He might no longer have the fastest serve on the tour, but every other part of his game has been honed to perfection – including his body. Roddick was never the most tactically-minded player on the tour, and he often let silly shot choices and rookie mistakes get the better of him, but with Stefanki’s help he has trained himself in the finer points of tennis tactics, and the results speak for themselves.

Perhaps the greatest lesson Roddick has learned from his veteran coach is that attitude is everything. In the past the American let bad losses get to him, and he often fell apart in matches if they weren’t going his way. But he has learned to put those days behind him – not only the bad days, but the good ones, like the day he became world number one and the day

he was crowned US Open champion. One can-not rely on past successes on the ATP Tour, and Roddick has realised that he is not the same player now as he was then. Instead he is look-ing to the future, hoping to emulate the likes of Andre Agassi and Jimmy Connors, who played some of their best tennis after the age of 28 (Roddick’s age).

Last year Andy Roddick said that his goal was to “get back into the conversation.” When ana-lysts and sports writers discuss who might win the next Grand Slam, he wants them to discuss him as a legitimate threat. We can honestly say that after winning titles in Brisbane and Miami, and amassing the highest number of wins of anyone on the ATP circuit in 2010, Roddick is definitely back in the conversation, and if his rivals aren’t careful, he might soon be dominat-ing it.

The dream of an international tennis tournament in Miami be-gan in the 1960s, when top tennis players such as Jack Kramer, Frank Sedgman, Pancho Gonzalez, Pancho Segura and Butch Buchholz toured the country in a station wagon, playing tennis in darkened arenas and fairgrounds. It was before the days of Open tennis, and they traveled with a portable canvas court and plenty of hopes. Buchholz - an original member of the “Hand-some Eight” (the first recognized pros of Lamar Hunt’s World Championship Tennis Circuit introduced in 1968) - competed un-til he was forced to retire from tennis in 1970 with chronic ten-nis elbow. In 1980, when Buchholz was executive director of the Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP) - the player’s union - he met a vice president of the Thomas J. Lipton Company who liked his idea of creating a two-week players tournament. A sponsorship agreement would eventually be reached for $1.5 million a year for five years and Lipton would own the title.

The “Winter Wimbledon,” as it was first dubbed, would be the first major tournament of the year (the Australian Open was then held in December). It was decided that the first tournament would be held at Laver’s International Tennis Resort in Delray Beach, 50 miles north of Miami. Buchholz was thinking first class all the way and brought in Alan Mills, tournament referee at Wimbledon, as head referee, and Ted Tinling, a well-known tennis fashion designer since the 1920s, as director of protocol. He then approached the ATP and Women’s International Tennis Association and offered prize money, a percentage of the ticket sales and worldwide television rights. In return he wanted the rights to run the tournament for 15 years. The associations agreed, but Buchholz remembers that he had his detractors in the beginning. “The tours and some of the top players were skeptical,” Buchholz said. “Even [tennis writer/TV analyst] Bud Collins said at the time we didn’t need another combined event. At one point, I was sure if we didn’t have a signed contract the tour would have altered this event and we would not have the same event we have today.”

On Feb. 4, 1985, following 20 years of nurturing a dream to cre-ate a world-class tennis tournament, the first ball was struck at the International Players Championships and a new tradition in tennis began. Manuela Maleeva won the first point en route to a 6-3, 6-2 victory over Angeliki Kanellopula. The first tourna-ment turned out 84 of the top 100 men and 97 of the top 100 women. ESPN telecast the first weekend and the men’s semifi-nals, and ABC telecast the finals live. Networks from Australia, England, France, Italy, Japan, Sweden and West Germany also were present. The first champions were Tim Mayotte and Mar-tina Navratilova. The women’s final between Navratilova and Chris Evert was a sellout. Only Wimbledon and the U.S. Open exceeded the $1.8 million in prize money. But Laver’s was in financial trouble, so Buchholz moved the 1986 tournament to Boca West, an Arvida property in Boca Raton. This tournament hosted 43 of the top 50 men and 46 of the top 50 women. A tra-dition of excellent tennis had been established. But then Arvida sold Boca West, and Buchholz was again searching for a home for his event. It was after that successful second year that then-Dade County Manager and Sony Ericsson WTA Tour Executive Director Merrett Stierheim helped pave the way for a move to Miami. Stierheim showed Buchholz locations at Flamingo Park, Tropical Park and Amelia Earhart Park, before Buchholz crossed the Rickenbacker Causeway and fell in love with the property that would become the Tennis Center at Crandon Park, a Miami-Dade County Park that borders Key Biscayne.

TOURNAMENT HISTORYRECORDS AND STATS

Most Singles TitlesMale: 6 - Andre Agassi: 1990, 1995, 1996, 2001, 2002, 2003

Female: 5 - Steffi Graf: 1987, 1988, 1994, 1995, 19965 - Serena Williams: 2002, 2003, 2004, 2007, 2008

Most Consecutive TitlesMale: 3 - Andre Agassi: 2001, 2002 and 2003Female: 3 - Serena Williams 2004, 03, 02; Steffi Graf 1996, 95, 94

Most Consecutive Matches Won

Male:20 - Andre Agassi (Champion 2001, 2002, 2003; lost to Agustin Calleri in 2004 4th rd)17 - Pete Sampras (Champion 1993, 1994; lost to Andre Agassi in 1995 final)

Female:22 - Steffi Graf (Champion 1994, 1995, 1996; lost to Venus Williams in 1999 semifinal round)22 - Venus Williams (Champion 1998, 1999, 2001; lost to Serena Williams in 2002 semifinal)

Most Times Seeded No. 1 at the Tournament

Male: 5 - Ivan lendl (85, 86, 87, 89, 90) 5 - Roger Federer (04, 05, 06, 07, 08)

Female: 5 - Steffi Graf (88, 91, 93, 94, 96)5 - Martina Hingis (97, 98, 99, 00, 01)

Unseeded Players Who Advanced to the Finals2005: Kim Clijsters (winner)1999: Sebastien Grosjean1991: David Wheaton1985: Tim Mayotte (winner) and Scott Davis

Youngest & Oldest WinnersYoungest Male: Andre Agassi, 1990 (19 years, 330 days old)Youngest Female: Monica Seles, 1990 (16 years, 111 days old)Oldest Male: Andre Agassi, 2003 (32 years, 335 days old)Oldest Female: Chris Evert, 1986 (31 years, 44 days old)

Singles Players - Most FinalsMen: 8- Andre Agassi; 4- Pete Sampras; 3- Ivan Lendl, Roger Federer

Women: 7- Steffi Graf, Serena Williams; 5- Chris Evert; 3- Gabriela Sabatini, Monica Seles, Jennifer Capriati, Venus Williams

Most Doubles Titles - TeamsMen: 4 - Todd Woodbridge/Mark Woodforde: 1995, 1996, 1997, 2000Women: 3 - Gigi Fernandez/Natasha Zvereva: 1994, 1995 and 1996

Most Doubles Titles - IndividualMen: 4 - Todd Woodbridge (95, 96, 97, 00); Mark Woodforde (95, 96, 97, 00)

Women: 7 - Jana Novotna (89, 90, 93, 95, 96, 98, 99); 5 - Arantxa Sanchez V (92, 95, 96, 97, 01)

First Match PlayedFeb. 4, 1985 - Manuela Maleeva-Fragniere (4) d. Angeliki Kanellopoulou 6-3, 6-2

First Match on Stadium CourtMarch 11, 1994 - Karin Kschwendt def. Kathy Rinaldi-Stunkel, 6-3, 6-4

First Finals (1985)Men’s Singles: Tim Mayotte def. Scott Davis, 4-6, 4-6, 6-3, 6-2, 6-4Women’s Singles: Martina Navratilova def. Chris Evert, 6-2, 6-4Men’s Doubles: Annacone/van Rensburg def. Stewart/Warwick, 7-5, 7-5, 6-4Women’s Doubles: G. Fernandez/Navritilova def. Jordan/Mandilikova, 7-6, 6-2Mixed Doubles: Gunthardt/Navritilova def. Fibak/Bassett, 6-2, 6-2

Andy Roddick

Miami SCORECARDMurray 4/10Sterile rallies, poor shot selection and an al-most resigned passiveness cost Murray in this tournament. He played some poor tennis, but his attitude was ever worse than his game. At times it looked as if he honestly didn’t want to be on the court – didn’t even want to be playing tennis. A very poor performance from the Scot.

Djokovic 4/10Djokovic has lost his heart. He was booed off the court after a truly pathetic perfor-mance against Olivier Rochus, which likely played a large role in his decision to split with his coach, Todd Martin. But dumping Mar-tin isn’t likely to solve his problems – he was struggling long before Martin came on board, and will probably con-tinue to struggle without him. Like Mur-ray, his body language was simply awful throughout the week. Both of these guys are playing – and acting – like toddlers.

Federer 4.5/10For the second week in a row Federer has match points against an opponent but goes on to somehow lose the match. He was ahead several times in his fourth-round en-counter against Tomas Berdych, but could never hold on to his lead. It’s probably most-ly due to his lack of match practice, and he should be back to his best by the French Open.

Nadal 6/10So close, and yet so far. Nadal had this tourna-ment in the palm of his hands but let it slip away by playing too defensively and losing his nerve at key moments during his semi-final against Andy Roddick. He keeps getting bet-ter with every tournament though, and the clay court season should provide him with his first title in almost a year.

Soderling 7/10At his explosive best for most of the tourna-ment, Soderling lost steam against Berdych.

It’s a match that he could have, and should have, won. Despite his failure, he seems to be getting more consistent with his Masters 1000 results, and this should soon lead to a final or even a win.

Berdych 8/10Berdych has teased us all with his tremen-dous talent over the past five years, only to fall apart at the most vital moments in the most important tournaments. Now that he’s a bit older he seems able to manage his talent a bit better, and hopefully this will translate into a major breakthrough sometime soon.

Roddick 10/10The past eight months have been tough for Roddick, but he showed his character and re-silience in Miami by playing the best match of his life against Nadal in the semi-finals. The coming clay season might not be his favourite time of year, but with Wimbledon on the hori-zon he has chosen the perfect time to redis-cover his best tennis.

TENNISWORLD SA 25


1 FEDERER, Roger SUI CHAMPION GBR MURRAY, Andy 33R. FEDERER [1] A. MURRAY [3]

2 BYE BYE 34R. FEDERER [1] M. FISH

3 LAPENTTI, Nicolas ECU 63 63 64 64 USA FISH, Mardy 35N. LAPENTTI M. FISH

4 STARACE, Potito ITA 75 63 76(4) 64 ARG MAYER, Leonardo 36R. FEDERER [1] M. FISH

5 MASSU, Nicolas CHI 76(2) 76(3) 75 63 SVK LACKO, Lukas 37F. SERRA M. BERRER

6 SERRA, Florent FRA 64 64 75 46 63 GER BERRER, Michael 38F. SERRA F. LOPEZ [29]

7 BYE 63 36 62 76(2) 75 BYE 39A. MONTANES [26] F. LOPEZ [29]

8 MONTANES, Albert ESP ESP LOPEZ, Feliciano 40T. BERDYCH [16] M. YOUZHNY [13]

9 SIMON, Gilles FRA 64 67(3) 76(6) 61 10 Ret'd SUI WAWRINKA, Stanislas 41G. SIMON [20] S. WAWRINKA [19]

10 BYE BYE 42H. ZEBALLOS S. WAWRINKA [19]

11 ZEBALLOS, Horacio ARG 62 63 64 75 RSA ANDERSON, Kevin 43H. ZEBALLOS K. ANDERSON

12 SEPPI, Andreas ITA 76(4) 62 63 61 BRA MELLO, Ricardo 44T. BERDYCH [16] M. YOUZHNY [13]

13 RAM, Rajeev USA 64 75 16 76(5) 75 COL GIRALDO, Santiago 45T. DE BAKKER S. GIRALDO

14 DE BAKKER, Thiemo NED 64 75 63 62 BRA DANIEL, Marcos 46T. BERDYCH [16] M. YOUZHNY [13]

15 BYE 63 64 60 61 BYE 47T. BERDYCH [16] M. YOUZHNY [13]

16 BERDYCH, Tomas CZE RUS YOUZHNY, Mikhail 48

17 VERDASCO, Fernando ESP CHI GONZALEZ, Fernando 49

F. VERDASCO [10] F. GONZALEZ [9]18 BYE BYE 50

F. VERDASCO [10] F. GONZALEZ [9]19 KOROLEV, Evgeny KAZ 61 62 64 64 ITA FOGNINI, Fabio 51

D. SELA Y. LU20 SELA, Dudi ISR 63 63 67(5) 62 64 TPE LU, Yen-Hsun 52

F. VERDASCO [10] F. GONZALEZ [9]21 HANESCU, Victor ROU 36 76(4) 61 67(4) 64 62 TUR ILHAN, Marsel 53

A. FALLA M. ILHAN22 FALLA, Alejandro COL 76(4) 36 64 62 62 URU CUEVAS, Pablo 54

J. MELZER [23] J. MONACO [22]23 BYE 63 64 62 75 BYE 55

J. MELZER [23] J. MONACO [22]24 MELZER, Jurgen AUT ARG MONACO, Juan 56

F. VERDASCO [10] R. SODERLING [5]25 BAGHDATIS, Marcos CYP 64 76(3) 60 67(3) 62 SRB TIPSAREVIC, Janko 57

M. BAGHDATIS [25] J. TIPSAREVIC [31]26 BYE BYE 58

M. BAGHDATIS [25] P. PETZSCHNER27 LORENZI, Paolo ITA 62 64 64 60 GER PETZSCHNER, Philipp 59

J. CHELA P. PETZSCHNER28 CHELA, Juan Ignacio ARG 64 36 76(3) 63 61 USA SWEETING, Ryan 60

M. CILIC [7] R. SODERLING [5]29 ROBERT, Stephane FRA 63 64 61 62 AUS LUCZAK, Peter 61

S. ROBERT TOP HALF FINALIST P. LUCZAK30 BECK, Andreas GER 75 64 63 76(4) ESP HERNANDEZ, Oscar 62

M. CILIC [7] R. SODERLING [5]31 BYE 63 61 76(5) 60 BYE 63

M. CILIC [7] R. SODERLING [5]32 CILIC, Marin CRO SWE SODERLING, Robin 64

ATP, Inc. © Copyright 2001

Rank Rank Pts.1 1 9 GONZALEZ, Fernando 11 Winner $605,500 10002 2 10 VERDASCO, Fernando 12 Finalists $295,500 6003 3 11 LJUBICIC, Ivan 13 Semi-Finalists $148,100 3604 4 12 FERRERO, Juan Carlos 14 Quarter Finalists $75,500 1805 7 13 YOUZHNY, Mikhail 15 4th Round $39,800 906 8 14 MONFILS, Gael 16 3rd Round $21,300 457 9 15 FERRER, David 17 2nd Round $11,500 258 10 16 BERDYCH, Tomas 20 1st Round $7,050 10

FOLLOW LIVE SCORING AT www.ATPWorldTour.comTSONGA, Jo-Wilfried Rochus, C-85 M Darby/C Sanches/T Barnes/T KarlbergCILIC, Marin Last Direct Acceptance ATP Supervisor

SODERLING, Robin Mayer, Florian - RetirementRODDICK, Andy

DJOKOVIC, Novak Gicquel, Marc - RetirementMURRAY, Andy Koellerer, Daniel - RetirementNADAL, Rafael Ljubicic, Ivan - Retirement

Retirements/W.O.FEDERER, Roger Lapentti for Monfils Fish, Mardy - Retirement

Seeded Players Seeded Players Prize Money Lucky Losers

T. BERDYCH [16]

62 62

7 5

Q

23 22

25 31

Q

Q

16 13

10 T. BERDYCH [16] R. SODERLING [5]

9 46 76(5) 64 61 64

LL

Q

Q

Q

26 29

20 19

Q

Andy RODDICK [6]

LL75 64

Hard, Laykold cushion plus$3,645,000

1 403

3

Sony Ericsson OpenMAIN DRAW SINGLES

Miami, Fl, USAMarch 22-April 4, 2010

1st R

ound

2nd

Roun

d3r

d Ro

und

4th

Roun

dQu

arte

rfina

ls17

. PEE

R, S

haha

r65

.JAN

KOVI

C, J

elen

a (S

RB) [

7 ]

J.Ja

nkov

ic [

7 ]

18. R

EZAI

, Ara

vane

66.B

: BYE

J.

Jank

ovic

[ 7

]19

. HAN

TUCH

OVA,

Dan

iela

67.B

ARRO

IS, K

ristin

a (G

ER)

M.K

orytt

seva

6/4

6/0

20. Z

HENG

, Jie

68.Q

: KOR

YTTS

EVA,

Mar

iya (U

KR)

2/6

6/3

6/3

J.Ja

nkov

ic [

7 ]

21. B

ONDA

RENK

O, A

lona

69.G

OERG

ES, J

ulia

(GER

)J.G

oerg

es7/

6(3)

6/3

22

. PAV

LYUC

HENK

OVA,

Ana

stasia

70.Q

: MOR

ITA,

Ayu

mi (

JPN)

7/6(

3) 6

/4

E.Ve

snin

a [ 2

8 ]

23. L

ISIC

KI, S

abine

71.B

: BYE

E.Ve

snin

a [ 2

8 ]

6/3

6/4

24. K

LEYB

ANOV

A, A

lisa

72.V

ESNI

NA, E

lena

(RUS

) [ 2

8 ]

S.

Stos

ur [

9 ]

73.Z

HENG

, Jie

(CHN

) [ 2

0 ]

J.Zh

eng

[ 20

]6/

1 7/

6(9)

74

.B: B

YE

V.Ra

zzan

o75

.Q: L

EPCH

ENKO

, Var

vara

(USA

)V.

Razz

ano

6/4

6/2

76.R

AZZA

NO, V

irgini

e (F

RA)

6/3

5/0

RET

S.St

osur

[ 9

]77

.WC:

PIV

OVAR

OVA,

Ana

stasia

(RUS

)C.

Suar

ez N

avar

ro4/

6 7/

5 6/

1 78

.SUA

REZ

NAVA

RRO,

Car

la (E

SP)

6/1

7/6(

3)

S.St

osur

[ 9

]Se

mifin

al79

.B: B

YES.

Stos

ur [

9 ]

4/6

7/5

6/2

80.S

TOSU

R, S

aman

tha

(AUS

) [ 9

]

K.Cl

ijste

rs [

14 ]

81.C

LIJS

TERS

, Kim

(BEL

) [ 1

4 ]

K.Cl

ijste

rs [

14 ]

6/3

7/5

82.B

: BYE

K.

Clijs

ters

[ 14

]83

.KVI

TOVA

, Pet

ra (C

ZE)

P.Kv

itova

6/1

6/1

84.G

ARBI

N, T

athia

na (I

TA)

6/4

6/4

K.Cl

ijste

rs [

14 ]

85.D

USHE

VINA

, Ver

a (R

US)

A.Ku

drya

vtsev

a6/

0 6/

1 86

.KUD

RYAV

TSEV

A, A

lla (R

US)

4/6

6/1

6/4

S.Pe

er [

17 ]

87.B

: BYE

S.Pe

er [

17 ]

6/1

6/0

88.P

EER,

Sha

har (

ISR)

[ 17

]

K.Cl

ijste

rs [

14 ]

89.M

ARTI

NEZ

SANC

HEZ,

Mar

ia J

ose

(ESP

) [ 2

9 ]

M.M

artin

ez S

anch

ez [

29 ]

6/4

6/0

90.B

: BYE

L.

Safa

rova

91.S

AFAR

OVA,

Luc

ie (C

ZE)

L.Sa

faro

va4/

6 7/

6(3)

6/2

92

.KAN

EPI,

Kaia

(EST

)6/

7(1)

6/4

6/3

V.

Azar

enka

[ 4

]93

.DUL

GHER

U, A

lexan

dra

(ROU

)A.

Dulgh

eru

6/4

6/2

94.O

LARU

, Ioa

na R

aluca

(ROU

)6/

1 6/

3 V.

Azar

enka

[ 4

]Fi

nal

95.B

: BYE

V.Az

aren

ka [

4 ]

6/3

6/2

96.A

ZARE

NKA,

Vic

toria

(BLR

) [ 4

]

K.Cl

ijste

rs [

14 ]

97.D

EMEN

TIEV

A, E

lena

(RUS

) [ 5

]E.

Dem

entie

va [

5 ]

6/2

6/7(

3) 7

/6(6

) 98

.B: B

YE

J.Hen

in99

.CRA

YBAS

, Jill

(USA

)J.H

enin

6/3

6/2

100.

WC:

HEN

IN, J

ustin

e (B

EL)

6/2

6/2

J.Hen

in10

1.Q:

ARV

IDSS

ON, S

ofia

(SW

E)S.

Arvid

sson

6/4

6/4

102.

BRIA

NTI,

Albe

rta (I

TA)

6/2

6/4

D.Ci

bulk

ova

[ 26

]10

3.B:

BYE

D.Ci

bulk

ova

[ 26

]6/

0 6/

2 10

4.CI

BULK

OVA,

Dom

inik

a (S

VK) [

26

]

J.Hen

in10

5.KL

EYBA

NOVA

, Alis

a (R

US) [

24

]A.

Kley

bano

va [

24 ]

6/1

6/4

106.

B: B

YE

S.Er

rani

107.

MAL

EK, T

atjan

a (G

ER)

S.Er

rani

6/4

7/5

108.

ERRA

NI, S

ara

(ITA)

6/1

6/0

V.Zv

onar

eva

[ 11

]10

9.OU

DIN,

Mela

nie (U

SA)

M.O

udin

6/2

6/3

110.

Q: K

RAJIC

EK, M

ichae

lla (N

ED)

6/2

6/4

V.Zv

onar

eva

[ 11

]Se

mifin

al11

1.B:

BYE

V.Zv

onar

eva

[ 11

]6/

1 6/

2 11

2.ZV

ONAR

EVA,

Ver

a (R

US) [

11

]

J.Hen

in11

3.SC

HIAV

ONE,

Fra

nces

ca (I

TA) [

15

]F.

Schi

avon

e [ 1

5 ]

6/7(

5) 6

/3 6

/4

114.

B: B

YE

F.Sc

hiav

one

[ 15

]11

5.VO

EGEL

E, S

tefa

nie (S

UI)

A.Co

rnet

6/3

6/2

116.

CORN

ET, A

lize

(FRA

)6/

3 0/

6 6/

2 A.

Pavl

yuch

enko

va [

22 ]

25. I

VANO

VIC,

Ana

117.

KEOT

HAVO

NG, A

nne

(GBR

)T.

Pasz

ek7/

5 6/

3 26

. CIB

ULKO

VA, D

omini

ka11

8.PA

SZEK

, Tam

ira (A

UT)

6/4

6/2

A.Pa

vlyu

chen

kova

[ 22

]27

. SZA

VAY,

Agn

es11

9.B:

BYE

A.Pa

vlyu

chen

kova

[ 22

]7/

6(4)

4/6

6/3

28

. VES

NINA

, Elen

a12

0.PA

VLYU

CHEN

KOVA

, Ana

stas

ia (R

US) [

22

]

C.W

ozni

acki

[ 2

]29

. MAR

TINE

Z SA

NCHE

Z, M

aria

Jose

121.

KIRI

LENK

O, M

aria

(RUS

) [ 3

2 ]

M.K

irile

nko

[ 32

]6/

2 6/

2 30

. MED

INA

GARR

IGUE

S, A

nabe

l12

2.B:

BYE

M

.Kiri

lenk

o [ 3

2 ]

31. W

OZNI

AK, A

leksa

ndra

123.

CZIN

K, M

elind

a (H

UN)

M.C

zink

4/6

6/2

7/6(

4)

32. K

IRIL

ENKO

, Mar

ia12

4.W

C: R

US, A

rant

xa (N

ED)

3/6

6/1

7/6(

6)

C.W

ozni

acki

[ 2

]

125.

Q: P

IRON

KOVA

, Tsv

etan

a (B

UL)

T.Pi

ronk

ova

1/6

6/1

6/4

12

6.W

C: W

ATSO

N, H

eath

er (G

BR)

6/4

6/2

C.W

ozni

acki

[ 2

]

127.

B: B

YEC.

Woz

niac

ki [

2 ]

3/6

6/3

6/4

128.

WOZ

NIAC

KI, C

arol

ine

(DEN

) [ 2

]

Son

y E

ricss

on O

pen

2010

- W

omen

's S

ingl

es

K.Cl

ijste

rs [1

4]6/

2 6/

1

Prin

ted

at 1

8:47

on

3 A

pr 2

010

65 TSONGA, Jo-Wilfried FRA BOTTOM HALF FINALIST USA RODDICK, Andy 97J. TSONGA [8] A. RODDICK [6]

66 BYE BYE 98J. TSONGA [8] A. RODDICK [6]

67 CLEMENT, Arnaud FRA 64 63 64 64 RUS ANDREEV, Igor 99G. GARCIA-LOPEZ I. ANDREEV

68 GARCIA-LOPEZ, Guillermo ESP 76(4) 62 64 64 BEL MALISSE, Xavier 100J. TSONGA [8] A. RODDICK [6]

69 CHIUDINELLI, Marco SUI 62 75 62 61 CZE HAJEK, Jan 101F. MAYER S. STAKHOVSKY

70 MAYER, Florian GER 76(2) 16 62 63 57 75 UKR STAKHOVSKY, Sergiy 102P. KOHLSCHREIBER [28] S. STAKHOVSKY

71 BYE 66 Ret'd 63 76(5) BYE 103P. KOHLSCHREIBER [28] J. BENNETEAU [32]

72 KOHLSCHREIBER, Philipp GER FRA BENNETEAU, Julien 104J. TSONGA [8] A. RODDICK [6]

73 ISNER, John USA 62 62 76(4) 63 ESP ROBREDO, Tommy 105J. ISNER [17] T. ROBREDO [18]

74 BYE BYE 106J. ISNER [17] T. ROBREDO [18]

75 ISTOMIN, Denis UZB 76(5) 26 76(5) 63 46 64 FRA MATHIEU, Paul-Henri 107M. RUSSELL I. MARCHENKO

76 RUSSELL, Michael USA 76(5) 64 63 76(3) UKR MARCHENKO, Illya 108J. FERRERO [12] B. BECKER

77 KOELLERER, Daniel AUT 62 36 63 16 64 76(1) GER GREUL, Simon 109D. KOELLERER B. BECKER

78 ROCHUS, Christophe BEL 46 63 62 63 62 GER BECKER, Benjamin 110J. FERRERO [12] B. BECKER

79 BYE 40 Ret'd 46 01 Ret'd BYE 111J. FERRERO [12] I. LJUBICIC [11]

80 FERRERO, Juan Carlos ESP CRO LJUBICIC, Ivan 112

81 FERRER, David ESP ESP ALMAGRO, Nicolas 113

D. FERRER [15] N. ALMAGRO [33]82 BYE BYE 114

D. FERRER [15] N. ALMAGRO [33]83 LLODRA, Michael FRA 62 64 64 75 ARG SCHWANK, Eduardo 115

M. LLODRA E. SCHWANK84 HARRISON, Ryan USA 62 62 43 Ret'd FRA GICQUEL, Marc 116

D. FERRER [15] N. ALMAGRO [33]85 GOLUBEV, Andrey KAZ 76(5) 63 62 67(9) 63 CRO ANCIC, Mario 117

D. GIMENO-TRAVER J. CHARDY86 GIMENO-TRAVER, Daniel ESP 63 64 64 64 FRA CHARDY, Jeremy 118

I. KARLOVIC [24] J. CHARDY87 BYE 63 67(5) 63 46 64 62 BYE 119

I. KARLOVIC [24] S. QUERREY [21]88 KARLOVIC, Ivo CRO USA QUERREY, Sam 120

R. NADAL [4] N. ALMAGRO [33]89 TROICKI, Viktor SRB 76(5) 64 64 36 76(3) BRA BELLUCCI, Thomaz 121

V. TROICKI [30] T. BELLUCCI [27]90 BYE BYE 122

D. NALBANDIAN T. BELLUCCI [27]91 NALBANDIAN, David ARG 63 46 64 36 61 62 SRB KRAJINOVIC, Filip 123

D. NALBANDIAN J. BLAKE92 KUBOT, Lukasz POL 63 62 67(6) 64 64 USA BLAKE, James 124

R. NADAL [4] T. BELLUCCI [27]93 DENT, Taylor USA 67(8) 62 62 63 64 BEL ROCHUS, Olivier 125

T. DENT O. ROCHUS94 SCHUETTLER, Rainer GER 61 64 CHAMPION 76(2) 16 64 FRA GASQUET, Richard 126

R. NADAL [4] O. ROCHUS95 BYE 64 63 62 67(7) 64 BYE 127

R. NADAL [4] N. DJOKOVIC [2]96 NADAL, Rafael ESP SRB DJOKOVIC, Novak 128


Rank Rank Pts.17 21 25 BAGHDATIS, Marcos 30 Winner $605,500 100018 22 26 MONTANES, Albert 31 Finalists $295,500 60019 23 27 BELLUCCI, Thomaz 32 Semi-Finalists $148,100 36020 24 28 KOHLSCHREIBER, Philipp 33 Quarter Finalists $75,500 18021 25 29 LOPEZ, Feliciano 34 4th Round $39,800 9022 26 30 TROICKI, Viktor 35 3rd Round $21,300 4523 28 31 TIPSAREVIC, Janko 36 2nd Round $11,500 2524 29 32 BENNETEAU, Julien 37 1st Round $7,050 10

FOLLOW LIVE SCORING AT www.ATPWorldTour.com

ATP SupervisorKARLOVIC, Ivo Rochus, C-85 M Darby/C Sanches/T Barnes/T Karlberg

MONACO, JuanMELZER, Jurgen Last Direct Acceptance

SIMON, Gilles Ljubicic, Ivan - RetirementQUERREY, Sam Mayer, Florian - Retirement

ISNER, John Lapentti for Monfils Fish, Mardy - RetirementROBREDO, Tommy Gicquel, Marc - RetirementWAWRINKA, Stanislas Koellerer, Daniel - Retirement

4 75 64

2 Seeded Players Seeded Players Prize Money Lucky Losers Retirements/W.O.

Q

Andy RODDICK [6]

WC WC

24 21

30 27

WC

Q WC

12 11

15 R. NADAL [4] A. RODDICK [6]

33 63 62 63 63

Q

Q

28 32

17 18

Q

A. RODDICK [6]

46 63 63

$3,645,000

8 403

6

MAIN DRAW SINGLESMiami, Fl, USA

March 22-April 4, 2010Hard, Laykold cushion plus

Sony Ericsson Open

1st R

ound

2nd

Roun

d3r

d Ro

und

4th

Roun

dQu

arte

rfina

ls

1. K

UZNE

TSOV

A, S

vetla

na1.

KUZN

ETSO

VA, S

vetla

na (R

US) [

1 ]

S.Ku

znet

sova

[ 1

]2.

WOZ

NIAC

KI, C

aroli

ne2.

B: B

YE

S.Ku

znet

sova

[ 1

]3.

WIL

LIAM

S, V

enus

3.PE

NG, S

huai

(CHN

)S.

Peng

6/2

3/6

6/4

4. A

ZARE

NKA,

Vict

oria

4.KI

NG, V

ania

(USA

)6/

4 1/

6 6/

3 S.

Kuzn

etso

va [

1 ]

5. D

EMEN

TIEV

A, E

lena

5.W

C: M

OLIK

, Alic

ia (A

US)

A.M

olik

6/2

6/3

6. R

ADW

ANSK

A, A

gnies

zka

6.HA

RKLE

ROAD

, Ash

ley (U

SA)

6/1

6/1

A.Sz

avay

[ 27

]7.

JANK

OVIC

, Jele

na7.

B: B

YEA.

Szav

ay [

27 ]

6/0

6/0

8. L

I, Na

8.SZ

AVAY

, Agn

es (H

UN) [

27

]

M.B

arto

li [ 1

3 ]

9.BO

NDAR

ENKO

, Alo

na (U

KR) [

21

]A.

Bond

aren

ko [

21 ]

6/3

6/0

10.B

: BYE

G.

Dulko

11.D

ULKO

, Gise

la (A

RG)

G.Du

lko7/

5 6/

2 12

.GOV

ORTS

OVA,

Olga

(BLR

)6/

4 6/

1 M

.Bar

toli

[ 13

]13

.HRA

DECK

A, L

ucie

(CZE

)M

.Ryb

ariko

va7/

6(2)

6/4

14

.RYB

ARIK

OVA,

Mag

dalen

a (S

VK)

3/6

6/4

6/2

M.B

arto

li [ 1

3 ]

Sem

ifinal

15.B

: BYE

M.B

arto

li [ 1

3 ]

6/2

6/4

16.B

ARTO

LI, M

ario

n (F

RA) [

13

]

M.B

arto

li [ 1

3 ]

17.W

ICKM

AYER

, Yan

ina

(BEL

) [ 1

2 ]

Y.W

ickm

ayer

[ 12

]6/

4 7/

5 18

.B: B

YE

Y.W

ickm

ayer

[ 12

]19

.BEN

ESOV

A, Iv

eta

(CZE

)E.

Balta

cha

6/1

6/3

20.Q

: BAL

TACH

A, E

lena

(GBR

)6/

2 6/

4 Y.

Wic

kmay

er [

12 ]

21.C

OIN,

Julie

(FRA

)P.

Mar

tic6/

3 6/

3 22

.WC:

MAR

TIC,

Pet

ra (C

RO)

5/7

7/6(

1) 6

/3

P.M

artic

23.B

: BYE

A.Re

zai [

18

]7/

5 5/

7 6/

4 24

.REZ

AI, A

rava

ne (F

RA) [

18

]

Y.W

ickm

ayer

[ 12

]25

.WOZ

NIAK

, Ale

ksan

dra

(CAN

) [ 3

1 ]

A.W

ozni

ak [

31 ]

6/0

6/1

26.B

: BYE

P.

Herc

og27

.ZAH

LAVO

VA S

TRYC

OVA,

Bar

bora

(CZE

)P.

Herc

og7/

6(5)

6/3

28

.HER

COG,

Polo

na (S

LO)

6/3

6/0

T.Ba

csins

zky

29.B

ACSI

NSZK

Y, T

imea

(SUI

)T.

Bacs

inszk

y6/

2 6/

2 30

.Q: M

ATTE

K-SA

NDS,

Bet

hanie

(USA

)6/

4 6/

4 T.

Bacs

inszk

yFi

nal

31.B

: BYE

N.Li

[ 8

]6/

4 4/

6 7/

6(3)

32

.LI, N

a (C

HN) [

8 ]

V.

Willi

ams

[ 3 ]

33.W

ILLI

AMS,

Ven

us (U

SA) [

3 ]

V.W

illiam

s [ 3

]6/

3 6/

4 34

.B: B

YE

V.W

illiam

s [ 3

]35

.WC:

LAR

CHER

DE

BRIT

O, M

ichell

e (P

OR)

S.Ci

rste

a6/

4 6/

3 36

.CIR

STEA

, Sor

ana

(ROU

)7/

5 7/

6 V.

Will

iam

s [ 3

]37

.Q: K

ULIK

OVA,

Reg

ina (R

US)

R.Vi

nci

6/1

6/4

38.V

INCI

, Rob

erta

(ITA

)3/

6 6/

3 6/

4 R.

Vinc

i39

.B: B

YEA.

Med

ina

Garri

gues

[ 30

]6/

4 7/

6(5)

40

.MED

INA

GARR

IGUE

S, A

nabe

l (ES

P) [

30 ]

V.

Will

iam

s [ 3

]41

.HAN

TUCH

OVA,

Dan

iela

(SVK

) [ 1

9 ]

D.Ha

ntuc

hova

[ 19

]1/

6 7/

5 6/

4 42

.B: B

YE

D.Ha

ntuc

hova

[ 19

]43

.SRE

BOTN

IK, K

atar

ina (S

LO)

P.Sc

hnyd

er6/

1 6/

4 44

.SCH

NYDE

R, P

atty

(SUI

)6/

2 6/

7(3)

6/1

D.

Hant

ucho

va [

19 ]

45.C

HAKV

ETAD

ZE, A

nna

(RUS

)K.

Date

Kru

mm

6/2

6/4

46.D

ATE

KRUM

M, K

imiko

(JPN

)7/

5 3/

6 6/

4 N.

Petro

va [

16 ]

Sem

ifinal

47.B

: BYE

N.Pe

trova

[ 16

]6/

3 7/

6(7)

48

.PET

ROVA

, Nad

ia (R

US) [

16

]

V.W

illiam

s [ 3

]49

.PEN

NETT

A, F

lavi

a (IT

A) [

10 ]

F.Pe

nnet

ta [

10 ]

6/3

6/1

50.B

: BYE

A.

Petko

vic51

.Q: R

ODIO

NOVA

, Ana

stasia

(AUS

)A.

Petko

vic6/

3 3/

6 6/

0 52

.PET

KOVI

C, A

ndre

a (G

ER)

6/4

6/2

Y.Sh

vedo

va9.

STO

SUR,

Sam

anth

a53

.SHV

EDOV

A, Y

aros

lava

(KAZ

)Y.

Shve

dova

6/0

5/7

7/5

10. P

ENNE

TTA,

Flav

ia54

.WC:

TOM

LJAN

OVIC

, Ajla

(CRO

)6/

7(1)

7/6

(3) 7

/5

Y.Sh

vedo

va11

. ZVO

NARE

VA, V

era

55.B

: BYE

S.Li

sick

i [ 2

3 ]

6/3

0/1

RET

12. W

ICKM

AYER

, Yan

ina56

.LIS

ICKI

, Sab

ine

(GER

) [ 2

3 ]

A.

Radw

ansk

a [ 6

]13

. BAR

TOLI

, Mar

ion57

.IVA

NOVI

C, A

na (S

RB) [

25

]A.

Ivan

ovic

[ 25

]6/

1 6/

4 14

. CLI

JSTE

RS, K

im58

.B: B

YE

A.Iv

anov

ic [

25 ]

15. S

CHIA

VONE

, Fra

nces

ca59

.BAM

MER

, Syb

ille (A

UT)

P.Pa

rmen

tier

6/4

6/3

16. P

ETRO

VA, N

adia

60.Q

: PAR

MEN

TIER

, Pau

line

(FRA

)6/

3 3/

6 6/

3 A.

Radw

ansk

a [ 6

]61

.MAK

AROV

A, E

kate

rina

(RUS

)E.

Mak

arov

a7/

5 7/

5 62

.Q: D

ELLA

CQUA

, Cas

ey (A

US)

6/3

7/5

A.Ra

dwan

ska

[ 6 ]

63.B

: BYE

A.Ra

dwan

ska

[ 6 ]

7/5

6/0

64.R

ADW

ANSK

A, A

gnie

szka

(POL

) [ 6

]

Son

y E

ricss

on O

pen

2010

- W

omen

's S

ingl

es

K.Cl

ijste

rs [1

4]6/

2 6/

1

Prin

ted

at 1

8:47

on

3 A

pr 2

010


Indian Wells

All right, we confess: we had no idea Ivan Ljubicic would win the title at In-dian Wells. To be fair, we don’t even

think a clairvoyant would have called this one, and anyone who took a bet on the big Croatian can surely retire as a millionaire now. What a wonderful birthday present for Ljubicic, though: his first Masters Series 1000 title only a day af-ter her turned 31. For ten days he played like a 20-year-old, serving better than Andy Roddick and rallying with more intensity than Rafael Nadal – truly a performance worthy of the days when he was ranked number three in the world. When was the last time someone beat three Top 10 players in the same tournament? We certainly can’t remember.

This time last year Ljubicic wasn’t even ranked in the Top 70, and now he’s in the Top 15. Sud-denly, his goal of reaching the ATP World Tour

Finals (where the best eight players of the year face off against each other) doesn’t look so un-realistic.

So close, Andy, and yet so farThere were many losers at the BNP Paribas Open, and Andy Roddick was the best among them, but that certainly won’t console the American. Playing on his favourite surface in front of a home crowd, and heading into his favourite part of a tennis match (a tie break), very few people would have thought that Rod-dick wouldn’t emerge victorious. Yet as has been the case so many times in the past, his nerve failed him. What Roddick needs is the kind of steely resolve that his one-time mentor Jimmy Connors had. We cannot imagine that old Jimbo would have lost that match – if it was the last thing he ever did, he would have found a way. Roddick will be kicking himself

over the fact that after making the final, and with Federer already out of the tournament, he couldn’t capitalise on his opportunities (and there were many).

Will the real Nadal please stand up?Nadal had this tournament in the palm of his hands. Federer? Djokovic? Murray? Out, out and out, with Del Potro and Davydenko injured. Who could possibly stop the Spaniard from winning his first title for almost a year? Cer-tainly not a 31-year-old Croat on the verge of retirement. You could try and explain his loss by saying that he is still struggling with his new, more aggressive forehand. You could say that he isn’t yet totally fit, or that he wasn’t comfort-able on the fast hard court. Even if all of these excuses were true, they still can’t quite explain one thing: Nadal had this match in the bag, and he let it go. What was up with the slice back-

hands in the third set? We haven’t ever seen Nadal play that negatively. He was basically inviting Ljubicic to put him out of his misery. At this point there is only one thing that is keep-ing Nadal from winning tournaments, and that is Nadal himself. He needs to get his mindset right, get his confidence back, and start win-ning.

Murray makes a mess, Djokovic falls apartLjubicic’s victory was surprising, but Murray and Djokovic’s performances were shocking. The Scot was embarrassed in his first set against Robin Soderling, which he lost 6-1, and Djokovic was humbled when he lost a set 6-0 to the lowly Mardy Fish. What is going on with these two? It’s bad enough that they are playing so poorly, but their attitude on court is even worse than their shot making. Murray is grumpy and mopey, and drags himself from one end of the court to the other like some sulking toddler. Djokovic, on the other hand, overreacts at every single shot he misses, gesticulating like it’s all some sort of conspiracy against him. They aren’t doing themselves – or tennis – any good by acting like children. It’s especially an-noying since both of these guys have been say-ing how much they’ve matured over the past year. Please guys, grow up!

If it’s not a Slam, Roger doesn’t careFederer just never seems to bring his best ten-nis these days unless he’s playing a Slam. He was sloppy in Indian Wells, losing a set unnec-essarily to Victor Hanescu and a whole match to Marcos Baghdatis. The match against the

Cypriot was especially confusing, since Federer had it all but won. He had several match points, but just couldn’t convert. We can cut him some slack since he’s had a lung infection recently, and hasn’t played much tennis of late, but we certainly hope that this doesn’t become a habit for him.

Welcome back, Super Mario!Another Croat who made some waves in Cali-fornia was the popular Mario Ancic. The per-petually unlucky young man hasn’t played on the tour in a year thanks to a string of injuries, but luckily he seems to be healthy now. He had a good run to the third round, and we hope that this is the start of bigger and better things for Super Mario in 2010.

Another noteworthy performance was that of 17 year-old Ryan Harrison, who received a wild card into the main draw (his ranking is a lowly 284). He had a solid win against fellow Ameri-can Taylor Dent before bowing out against Lju-bicic, but not before proving himself worthy of a spot on the men’s tour.

Jankovic the comeback queenIt wasn’t quite as big a shock as Ljubicic’s win, but Jelena Jankovic certainly didn’t show any signs of life coming into the BNP Paribas Open. The Serb has had an awful year – never making a quarter-final – and had fallen off the map of women’s tennis before California revived her. Her path to the finals was also made consider-ably easier by the absence of Serena Williams and the defeat of her sister Venus. Instead she had to play the in-form Caroline Wozniacki in

the final. It was a tough contest but Jankovic held firm, never allowing the world number two a chance to take control of the match. Like Jankovic, Wozniacki has yet to prove her worthiness at the number two spot, and like so many of her contemporaries she won’t be able to firmly sit among her generation’s greats until she has won a Slam.

Stosur cracks the Top 10It was a good week for Aussies at the BNP Paribas Open, with both Sam Stosur and Ali-cia Molik recording a series of solid wins. Stosur reached the semi-finals before falling to Jankovic, and finally reached the Top 10 for the first time in her career. Molik, on the other hand, is not even in the Top 100, and only entered the main draw thanks to a wild card. Molik has struggled throughout her career with injuries, but finally seems to be fit for play. We hope that Indian Wells marks only the start of a long-overdue comeback.

Hats off up to those of you who bet that the Croat would win…Although we aren’t sure there are any such people out there. Nevertheless, we can’t remember a victory that was as well deserved. After beating Djokovic, Nadal and Roddick, Ivan Ljubicic can truly say that he deserves that Masters 1000 trophy that has eluded him for so long.

From Indian WellsFabrice Faith


30 TENNISWORLD SA TENNISWORLD SA 3130 TENNISWORLD SA TENNISWORLD SA 31

1 KUZNETSOVA, Svetlana RUS CHAMPION BLR AZARENKA, Victoria 33S. KUZNETSOVA [1] V. AZARENKA [3]

2 BYE BYE 34C. SUAREZ NAVARRO V. AZARENKA [3]

3 CORNET, Alize FRA 64 46 61 61 75 SLO SREBOTNIK, Katarina 35C. SUAREZ NAVARRO S. BAMMER

4 SUAREZ NAVARRO, Carla ESP 64 16 62 36 75 61 AUT BAMMER, Sybille 36C. SUAREZ NAVARRO M. MARTINEZ SANCHEZ [28]

5 CHAN, Yung-Jan TPE 64 36 61 76(4) 62 ROU DULGHERU, Alexandra 37Y. CHAN A. DULGHERU

6 VOEGELE, Stefanie SUI 60 75 62 62 POR LARCHER DE BRITO, Michelle 38A. SZAVAY [27] M. MARTINEZ SANCHEZ [28]

7 BYE 63 62 26 63 61 BYE 39A. SZAVAY [27] M. MARTINEZ SANCHEZ [28]

8 SZAVAY, Agnes HUN ESP MARTINEZ SANCHEZ, Maria Jose 40A. KLEYBANOVA [23] M. MARTINEZ SANCHEZ [28]

9 KLEYBANOVA, Alisa RUS 26 76(2) 64 64 64 SVK HANTUCHOVA, Daniela 41A. KLEYBANOVA [23] D. HANTUCHOVA [21]

10 BYE BYE 42A. KLEYBANOVA [23] R. VINCI

11 PIRONKOVA, Tsvetana BUL 67(5) 63 61 63 75 ITA VINCI, Roberta 43T. PIRONKOVA R. VINCI

12 AMANMURADOVA, Akgul UZB 63 62 36 63 60 USA OUDIN, Melanie 44A. KLEYBANOVA [23] Y. WICKMAYER [13]

13 ZAHLAVOVA STRYCOVA, Barbora CZE 64 16 76(4) 61 36 63 CZE SAFAROVA, Lucie 45B. ZAHLAVOVA STRYCOVA J. GOERGES

14 PETKOVIC, Andrea GER 63 63 75 36 63 GER GOERGES, Julia 46K. CLIJSTERS [14] Y. WICKMAYER [13]

15 BYE 62 61 62 64 BYE 47K. CLIJSTERS [14] Y. WICKMAYER [13]

16 CLIJSTERS, Kim BEL BEL WICKMAYER, Yanina 48

17 PENNETTA, Flavia ITA RUS ZVONAREVA, Vera 49F. PENNETTA [9] V. ZVONAREVA [12]

18 BYE BYE 50F. PENNETTA [9] V. ZVONAREVA [12]

19 BRIANTI, Alberta ITA 63 63 64 75 CZE HRADECKA, Lucie 51P. KVITOVA S. STEPHENS

20 KVITOVA, Petra CZE 63 64 76(5) 76(7) USA STEPHENS, Sloane 52S. PEER [17] V. ZVONAREVA [12]

21 SHVEDOVA, Yaroslava KAZ 64 67(4) 61 62 63 LAT SEVASTOVA, Anastasija 53B. MATTEK-SANDS A. SEVASTOVA

22 MATTEK-SANDS, Bethanie USA 75 75 62 36 61 ESP LLAGOSTERA VIVES, Nuria 54S. PEER [17] A. SEVASTOVA

23 BYE 62 63 62 64 BYE 55S. PEER [17] A. IVANOVIC [24]

24 PEER, Shahar ISR SRB IVANOVIC, Ana 56J. JANKOVIC [6] S. STOSUR [8]

25 CIBULKOVA, Dominika SVK 62 62 62 75 RUS PAVLYUCHENKOVA, Anastasia 57D. CIBULKOVA [26] A. PAVLYUCHENKOVA [25]

26 BYE BYE 58S. ERRANI A. PAVLYUCHENKOVA [25]

27 KUTUZOVA, Viktoriya UKR 75 64 63 61 CRO SPREM, Karolina 59S. ERRANI K. SPREM

28 ERRANI, Sara ITA 75 62 62 46 63 USA PERRY, Shenay 60J. JANKOVIC [6] S. STOSUR [8]

29 MARTIC, Petra CRO 26 76(6) 64 63 60 FRA COIN, Julie 61P. MARTIC TOP HALF FINALIST J. COIN

30 TOMLJANOVIC, Ajla CRO 76(4) 61 64 63 AUT PASZEK, Tamira 62J. JANKOVIC [6] S. STOSUR [8]

31 BYE 63 76(2) 61 76(4) BYE 63J. JANKOVIC [6] S. STOSUR [8]

32 JANKOVIC, Jelena SRB AUS STOSUR, Samantha 64

Rank Rank Pts.1 3 9 12 Winner $700,000 10002 4 10 13 Finalists $350,000 7003 6 11 14 Semi-Finalists $150,000 4504 7 12 15 Quarter Finalists $64,700 2505 8 13 16 4th Round $32,000 1406 9 14 17 3rd Round $18,740 807 10 15 18 2nd Round $11,500 508 11 16 19 1st Round $7,050 5

BNP Paribas OpenMAIN DRAW SINGLES

Indian Wells, USA 8-21 March 2010Hard

WTA Premier Mandatory - $4,500,000

1 3

Jelena JANKOVIC [6]

62 64

Q

Q

27 28

23 21

Q

Q

14 13

9 J. JANKOVIC [6] S. STOSUR [8]

12 64 64 63 76(7)

Q

WC Q

17 24

26 25

Q Q

Q

Q

WC WCJ. JANKOVIC [6]

62 64

6 8 Seeded Players Seeded Players Prize Money Lucky Losers Retirements/W.O.

KUZNETSOVA, Svetlana PENNETTA, Flavia Tanasugarn, Tamarine -Groenefeld, Anna-Lena Chakvadatze - left ankle injuryWOZNIACKI, Caroline SHARAPOVA, Maria Lisciki - Left ankle injuryAZARENKA, Victoria BARTOLI, MarionDEMENTIEVA, Elena ZVONAREVA, VeraRADWANSKA, Agnieszka WICKMAYER, YaninaJANKOVIC, Jelena CLIJSTERS, KimLI, Na SCHIAVONE, Francesca Last Direct Acceptance Players Representative Sony Ericsson WTA Tour SupervisorSTOSUR, Samantha PETROVA, Nadia 81 - Barrois D Kelso/L Cecceralli/T Cho

Follow Live Scoring at www.sonyericssonwtatour.com

1 FEDERER, Roger SUI CHAMPION GBR MURRAY, Andy 33R. FEDERER [1] A. MURRAY [4]

2 BYE BYE 34R. FEDERER [1] A. MURRAY [4]

3 HANESCU, Victor ROU 63 67(5) 61 64 64 USA GINEPRI, Robby 35V. HANESCU A. SEPPI

4 CHELA, Juan Ignacio ARG 63 76(4) 26 76(5) 63 ITA SEPPI, Andreas 36M. BAGHDATIS [27] A. MURRAY [4]

5 CLEMENT, Arnaud FRA 57 75 76(4) 63 75 ITA LORENZI, Paolo 37A. CLEMENT M. RUSSELL

6 LUCZAK, Peter AUS 46 63 62 62 75 USA RUSSELL, Michael 38M. BAGHDATIS [27] M. RUSSELL

7 BYE 76(7) 61 46 63 62 BYE 39M. BAGHDATIS [27] I. ANDREEV [32]

8 BAGHDATIS, Marcos CYP RUS ANDREEV, Igor 40T. ROBREDO [18] A. MURRAY [4]

9 ROBREDO, Tommy ESP 75 06 64 62 10 Ret'd CRO KARLOVIC, Ivo 41T. ROBREDO [18] I. KARLOVIC [23]

10 BYE BYE 42T. ROBREDO [18] N. ALMAGRO

11 STAKHOVSKY, Sergiy UKR 36 63 75 75 76(5) ESP ALMAGRO, Nicolas 43S. STAKHOVSKY N. ALMAGRO

12 ODESNIK, Wayne USA 61 64 63 62 GER ZVEREV, Mischa 44T. ROBREDO [18] N. ALMAGRO

13 SELA, Dudi ISR 63 60 64 36 63 USA BLAKE, James 45D. SELA J. BLAKE

14 LEVINE, Jesse USA 62 62 63 62 ESP GIMENO-TRAVER, Daniel 46D. SELA J. BLAKE

15 BYE 64 16 62 61 64 BYE 47R. STEPANEK [14] D. FERRER [13]

16 STEPANEK, Radek CZE ESP FERRER, David 48

17 MONFILS, Gael FRA FRA TSONGA, Jo-Wilfried 49

G. MONFILS [12] J. TSONGA [9]18 BYE BYE 50

S. GREUL J. TSONGA [9]19 GASQUET, Richard FRA 16 62 63 61 63 FRA LLODRA, Michael 51

S. GREUL M. MATOSEVIC20 GREUL, Simon GER 76(6) 76(7) 63 60 AUS MATOSEVIC, Marinko 52

J. MELZER [22] J. TSONGA [9]21 KOUBEK, Stefan AUT wo. 46 63 63 BRA MELLO, Ricardo 53

D. NALBANDIAN R. MELLO22 NALBANDIAN, David ARG 62 76(2) 26 63 64 ARG ZEBALLOS, Horacio 54

J. MELZER [22] A. MONTANES [24]23 BYE 64 61 36 64 64 BYE 55

J. MELZER [22] A. MONTANES [24]24 MELZER, Jurgen AUT ESP MONTANES, Albert 56

A. RODDICK [7] R. SODERLING [6]25 TIPSAREVIC, Janko SRB 76(5) 64 63 64 ESP LOPEZ, Feliciano 57

J. TIPSAREVIC [30] F. LOPEZ [28]26 BYE BYE 58

T. DE BAKKER F. LOPEZ [28]27 DE BAKKER, Thiemo NED 32 Ret'd 36 63 64 FRA MATHIEU, Paul-Henri 59

T. DE BAKKER P. MATHIEU28 DANIEL, Marcos BRA 63 63 63 61 GER BECKER, Benjamin 60

A. RODDICK [7] R. SODERLING [6]29 LU, Yen-Hsun TPE 63 64 76(3) 64 GER MAYER, Florian 61

Y. LU TOP HALF FINALIST E. KOROLEV30 HERNANDEZ, Oscar ESP 61 62 63 62 KAZ KOROLEV, Evgeny 62

A. RODDICK [7] R. SODERLING [6]31 BYE 64 64 62 64 BYE 63

A. RODDICK [7] R. SODERLING [6]32 RODDICK, Andy USA SWE SODERLING, Robin 64


Rank Rank Pts.1 1 9 TSONGA, Jo-Wilfried 11 Winner $605,500 10002 2 10 VERDASCO, Fernando 12 Finalists $295,500 6003 3 11 FERRERO, Juan Carlos 14 Semi-Finalists $148,100 3604 4 12 MONFILS, Gael 15 Quarter Finalists $75,500 1805 6 13 FERRER, David 16 4th Round $39,800 906 7 14 STEPANEK, Radek 17 3rd Round $21,300 457 8 15 ISNER, John 20 2nd Round $11,500 258 9 16 SIMON, Gilles 21 1st Round $7,050 10RODDICK, Andy

T Karlberg/C Sanches

DAVYDENKO, Nikolay

FOLLOW LIVE SCORING AT ATPWorldTour.comCILIC, Marin Russell - 90

Seeded PlayersSeeded Players Lucky LosersPrize MoneyFEDERER, RogerDJOKOVIC, NovakNADAL, Rafael

Last Direct Acceptance

SODERLING, Robin

MURRAY, Andy

$3,645,000

Q

BNP Paribas Open

Indian Wells, USA8-21 March 2010

Hard

18

27

Q

12

14

WC

22

7

30

404

WC

Ivan LJUBICIC [20]76(3) 76(5)

1

4

32

WC

24

23

Q

28

Q

13

9

ATP Supervisor

Starace - backCuevas - backMoya - right foot

6 Retirements/W.O.

A. RODDICK [7]

64 36 63

R. SODERLING [6]61 76(4)

A. RODDICK [7]63 75

MAIN DRAW SINGLES

Davydenko - wristGreul - illness

Monfils 4/10Monfils was certainly not at his best in the Californian

sun. Throughout his ugly loss to Simon Gruel

he looked irritated and distracted, and didn’t mind showing the whole world how

he felt. At times it seemed as if he wasn’t

even trying, and while every-one has bad days from time to time, fans certainly weren’t happy with his lacklustre performance.

Djokovic 6/10Well it was a long time com-ing. Djokovic had been play-ing awful tennis for months before Indian Wells and somehow always got away with it. He was spoiling for a loss, however, and eventually Ivan Ljubicic was the man who put him out of his misery. The Serb was lucky to even progress so far in the draw, as he should have lost against both Mardy Fish and Philipp Kohlschreiber in earlier rounds.

Federer 5/10It can happen to the best of us. Federer had his match against Marcos Baghdatis in the bag but seemed deter-mined not to close it out. He botched numerous match points against an increasingly bold opponent and eventually faltered in the deciding set tie break. We can give Federer a pass on this one though, as it was his first tournament back since winning the Australian Open and recovering from a lung infection.

Murray 5/10Murray has not been the same player since his dev-astating loss against Roger Federer in the Australian Open final. Error-prone, grumpy and utterly negative, it was only a matter of time before Murray lost in this tournament. It fell to Robin Soderling to do the dirty work in the end, and he humiliated the Scot a bit in the process as well.

Baghdatis 7/10Finally, Marcos, finally! The Cypriot has been looking for a big win his entire career, seemingly always ending up on the wrong end of epic matches. This time, however, he managed to close things out. Granted, Federer essen-tially gave him the win in the end, but it’s good to see Bagh-datis finally claim a big scalp. It’s just a shame he couldn’t follow it up with a win against Tommy Robredo.

Nadal 6/10Nadal seems to have re-gained his explosiveness, but not his confidence. A red car-pet had been laid out for him to the final, but he couldn’t capitalise on the early exits of all his major rivals. He played a solid match against Ljubicic in the semi-final, but was too passive in the third set, and that ultimately cost him the match. He’s knocking at the door though, and the clay season should be very interesting for him.

Ljubicic 10/10Fairy tales with happy end-ings exist in tennis too. One of the few things that eluded Ljubicic in is long and suc-cessful career was a Master Series 1000 trophy. Finally, he can sleep soundly at night. Two months ago it looked like Ljubicic was close to retirement, but he had a huge

surprise in store for all of us. Well done,

old boy!

Roddick 7/10Like Nadal, Roddick’s path to the final was helped by the early exit of Federer in his half of the draw. Unfortunately, he ran out of steam in the final. Some brutal serving from Ljubicic and a little hesitancy from Roddick was enough to ensure that the title stay out of the American’s hands. A solid effort, though.

How the Mighty Have FallenBy Paolo Bertolucci


Philipp Petzschner is a strange guy. How else could we describe him? Let’s con-sider the facts: After seven years as a

professional tennis player, Petzschner recorded only nine wins on the ATP World Tour. Now this in of itself isn’t so unusual – not everyone can make it on the main circuit, it’s a tough place to play. But what makes Petzschner’s case so strange is that after those seven years and nine wins he went to Vienna, won five straight matches – including a straight set win over Gael Monfils – and claimed the title in both the singles and the doubles. In that same year he boarded a plane in Austria and flew to Tokyo (a 9000km journey), and three hours after he stepped off the flight he beat a Top Ten player in the form of Stanislas Wawrinka. Now if that isn’t strange we don’t know what is. So what does the man himself say about all of this? “They normally call me Picasso. Because I’m pretty close between being a genius on the court and completely nuts. That’s what they say.” Like we said...strange.

Petzschner was born in Bayreuth, the same town that fellow tennis player Florian Mayer hails from, and started playing tennis at the age of four. “My father used to play, so it was pretty clear from the beginning that I start play-ing tennis. And I kind of liked it. So I made my hobby into a job,” he remembers.

At first it seemed as if Petzschner’s was going to be very successful in his new job. At junior level he reached the semi-finals of Wimbledon, and in 2002 he won the singles title at Roe-hampton (beating Marcos Baghdatis in the final) and the doubles title at Roland Garros.

32 TENNISWORLD SA

The world of professional tennis has come a long way since the beginning of its open era in the late sixties...only

forty years ago. And, almost at the same time, a professional men’s tournament was emerg-ing in the Southern California desert. Located in the second largest market in the country, it has evolved into the largest combined ATP World Tour and Sony Ericsson WTA Tour in the world next to the four Grand Slams. The BNP Paribas Open is a two-week combined ATP World Tour Masters 1000 and Sony Erics-son WTA Tour Premier event featuring the top men and women professional players compet-ing in a 96 singles draw and 32 doubles draw. The event is hosted at the magnificent Indian Wells Tennis Garden, located in the beautiful Southern California desert. Of the 23 sessions played, attendance is taken from only 20 ses-sions and in 2009 the event attracted over 330,000 tennis fans. The event offers equal prize money totaling $9 million. New owner,

Larry Ellison, CEO and co-founder of Oracle, purchased the BNP Paribas Open and the In-dian Wells Tennis Garden in December, 2009.

The Site – Indian Wells Tennis GardenCharlie Pasarell’s vision together with his partner Raymond Moore, the late Mark Mc-Cormack and former partners IMG was to build a $78 million, 89 acre state-of the-art tennis stadium with private funding in 2000. Considered to be one of the most spectacular

settings in the world, it is the second larg-est tennis stadium and boasts 16,100 seats. The site includes a total of 22 courts, a year-

round tennis club membership and is the host site for USTA and collegiate events out-side of the professional tennis. The beautiful landscaped grounds and stadium has also been the host site for musical artists Pava-rotti, Bocelli, the Boston Pops, The Who, Tom Petty, the Eagles and the annual Indian Wells Arts Festival.

BNP PARIBAS OPEN EVENT INFORMATION

“We’re here... We’re not going Anyplace... and we’re going for it.

”

Billie Jean King

“If you are a fan of the sport of tennis or just sport it is difficult not to be seduced by Charlie Pasarell’s dream in the desert. If this is not tennis Camelot, you can see it from here.

” Bill Dwyre, Past Sports Editor, Los Angeles Times

Petzschner

Petzschner


Unfortunately once he turned pro the results dried up, and Petzschner started wondering if he should have chosen a career in football (his other passion) instead. Though he reached the quarter-final in Metz in 2003, becoming the youngest German since Tommy Haas to achieve this feat, his other ATP Tour-level experiences were less encouraging. Soon questions arose about his work ethic, and some people started thinking that he didn’t take his tennis seriously enough. “People used to say I am half-crazy, arrogant, that I don’t feel like working. That isn’t true. I like to go for walks in the park, play golf. I am an hon-est person and I could never spend time with people who have no sense of humour. These are all normal things,” Petzschner recalls with a shrug. After a string of different coaches and numerous on-court meltdowns where he threw away matches he had basically already won, most people wrote Petzschner off as a “could have been.”

In 2006, Picasso suddenly underwent a change of heart. Tired of under-performing and realis-ing that his career was slipping away from him, he decided to get serious, hiring coach Klaus Langenbach and working with Werner Krass, who helped him overcome an injury and become fitter than ever. At the 2007 US Open he was ready to start his second career, fac-ing fellow German Benjamin Becker in an epic first-round encounter that he eventually won in the fifth set, earning him a second round clash against Tommy Haas. “The greatest moment of my sports career,” Petzschner says of his match

against Haas, “I qualified and then won that ab-surd match against Becker. Then it was against Haas, on the Grand Stand. A great match, great crowd, people went mad in the fourth. I lost in the fourth, but who cares!”

By September 2009 Petzschner had reached his best-ever ranking of 35 and again beat a Top Ten player (this time the Spaniard Fernando Verdasco). He also reached the third round of a Grand Slam tournament for the first time at Wimbledon, and showed that his game is par-ticularly suited to the grass courts of the All-England Club.

Of course he has suffered some crushing de-feats as well, but these usually only come against higher-ranked players, and Petzschner is now much more capable of taking any set-backs in his stride. This year he has already reached two semi-finals (in Memphis and Za-greb), and has his sights set on winning a sec-ond title – this time without having to qualify for entry into the main draw. Since becoming only the third qualifier to win a title in 2008, Petzschner has come a long way, in both his game and his attitude. Now firmly entrenched in the Top 100, the German is look-ing to make amends for past mistakes, and do justice to the incredible talent he neglected for so many years. “The last book I read is ‘Com-plete Idiot’. About a guy in his mid-thirties just making nonsense for his whole life. And just trying to build something.” Petzschner, too, is trying to build something, and from we’ve seen so far he’s doing a pretty good job.

Petzschner34 TENNISWORLD SA

N O T F O R S A L E T O P E R S O N S U N D E R T H E A G E O F 1 8 Y E A R S


Tolourful. This is how Bethanie Mattek-Sands likes to define herself. Colourful like the extravagant leopard print out-

fits and strange hats she wears on the tennis court. “I love extravagant clothes and this is probably why I love Italy and designers like Cavalli, who do not hold back with colour,”

she says. “I want to play in the Internazion-ali D’Italia soon… Sara [Errani] told me

that shopping in Rome is fantastic!”

Like Andre Agassi in the early 1990s, Sands

has to sup-press her natural flair for colour

whenever she goes to Wimbledon. She loves the Championships – her fourth round appearance there is her best Slam result to date – and doesn’t mind toning down her outrageous outfits for the opportunity to play on the lawns of the All England Club. “I am happy to be playing at Wimbledon. I love the tournament and attack game. True, everything is a little too white and traditional, but I have lots of fun.”

Unlike most of her peers, Sands doesn’t have a coach. “I do everything by myself and I don’t mind,” she says of her situation. “Sooner or later I will have to rely on a coach. I just have to find the right one, maybe a former player or someone with experience. I want the best.” Of course a certain Mr. Federer is also famous for going coachless for years on end, so she’s

in good company.

Born in Minnesota, Sands moved to Flor-ida with her entire family in tow once she realised that she wants to make tennis her life. “I am a competitive person and I realised soon enough that my future could not be behind a desk or in an office,” she remembers. “I love the freedom and adrenalin that sport can give. I can’t be without my family anywhere. They

have followed me and have believed in me and this makes it all easier.”

American tennis is not in a very good state, however, and it was a big risk for her par-ents let their child dedicate her life to a sport that is struggling in their home country. Bethanie is all too aware of her sport’s difficulties: “Right now tennis isn’t doing too well in America. Serena and Venus’s return to

Tolourful. This is how Bethanie Mattek-Sands likes to define herself. Colourful like the extravagant leopard print out-

fits and strange hats she wears on the tennis court. “I love extravagant clothes and this is probably why I love Italy and designers like Cavalli, who do not hold back with colour,” she says. “I want to play in the Internazion-ali D’Italia soon… Sara [Errani] told me that shopping in Rome is fantastic!”

Like Andre Agassi in the early 1990s, Sands has to suppress her natural flair for colour whenever she goes to Wimbledon. She loves the Championships – her fourth round appearance there is her best Slam result to date – and doesn’t mind toning down her out-rageous outfits for the opportunity to play on the lawns of the All England Club. “I am hap-py to be playing at Wimbledon. I love the tournament and at-tack game. True, everything is a little too white and tra-ditional, but I have lots of fun.”

Unlike most of

her peers, Sands doesn’t have a coach.

“I do everything by myself and I don’t mind,” she says of her situa-

tion. “Sooner or later I will have to rely on a coach. I just have to find the right one, maybe a former player or someone with experience. I want the best.” Of course a certain Mr. Fe-derer is also famous for going coachless for years on end, so she’s in good company.

Born in Minnesota, Sands moved to Florida with her entire family in tow once she re-alised that she wants to make tennis her life. “I am a competitive person and I realised soon enough that my future could not be be-hind a desk or in an office,” she remembers. “I love the freedom and adrenalin that sport can give. I can’t be without my family anywhere. They have followed me and have believed in me and this makes it all easier.”

American tennis is not in a very good state, however, and it was a big risk for her parents let their child dedicate her life to a sport that is struggling in their home country. Bethanie is all too aware of her sport’s difficulties: “Right now tennis isn’t doing too well in America. Serena and Venus’s return to win-ning in Slams and the finals between them have been good for American tennis. Maybe

winning in Slams and the finals between them have been good for American tennis. Maybe it will bring back some passion and a desire to work hard for tennis in many young players.”Sands has her own opinion on everything, and has a pretty clear idea why tennis isn’t doing well in the US. “Young players like me,” she explains, “have discovered that there are eas-ier ways to make money than sweating it out on the court with a racquet in hand. In the past sports could be a shortcut to becoming rich.” She doesn’t share the view of those people, however, and is happy to make sacrifices for her tennis. “I am competitive and this lifestyle suits me perfectly. I can travel a lot and I like this because I come into contact with people and cultures different from mine. From each of them I can learn something that makes me a richer and more complete person.” The exten-sive travelling can be a huge burden for many players, but Sands doesn’t mind. Her sis-ter Alison, who is also 22, often manages to travel with her, and she

s a y s they have

a lot of fun dis-covering new places

together.

Sands has enjoyed a great amount of success on the tour in recent years, beating Top Ten opponents in singles and obtaining a career-high ranking of 37th in the world. She has also won seven doubles titles and is currently ranked 12th in the world in that discipline. Her success has given her a new level of confi-dence. “I would like to win the US Open”, she says without hesitation, “because there is no other tournament in the world with the same atmosphere as that of New York. It is a Slam as unique as the city that hosts it.” Of course at the US Open she can wear exactly what she wants, which is fine by her. The only occasion other than Wimbledon that can get the ener-getic young American to wear all white is, as it turns out, her own wedding. She married Justin Sands in November of last year.

Bethanie Mattek-Sands


38 TENNISWORLD SA TENNISWORLD SA 3938 TENNISWORLD SA TENNISWORLD SA 39

Cilic Ma

rin

By Patrick Mouratoglou

His personality:

Marin is a calm and thoughtful player, and although he is young he is very mature. He’s someone who has

built his career – he hasn’t just come out of nowhere. This aspect of his personality is very important in order to understand the type of player he is and to analyze his game.

The Croatian has taken his time to build him-self up. He is indeed young, but he didn’t be-come known because of one big result. Year by year he’s grown, his ranking has gotten bet-ter, he’s built his way up at his own pace, with serenity. After these years of work, he’s built a very complete game with good baseline strokes on both wings. He’s good at net ap-proaches, has efficient foot work and volleys very well. He also serves and returns well.

All in all, Marin is a very complete player but doesn’t have lethal strokes.

Bob Brett (who has coached the likes of Goran Ivanisevic and Boris Becker) has been work-ing with him for some years. Bob is a friend who I worked with for five years. I know his methods, and I know that he cares particularly about creating an aggressive game in his play-ers, focusing especially on volleys and stroke repetition.

Analysis:Marin sticks very close to the baseline during most rallies. Because of this he’s very efficient at counter-attacking, and it’s difficult to get him out of position. He moves well, especially when we consider that he’s very tall. His court coverage is incredible thanks to these three

factors: quickness of movement, close proxim-ity to the baseline and physical size.

He is efficient with the forehand and the back-hand and can move his opponents around from both wings. In general, however, his backhand is more secure and consistent, but his fore-hand more explosive. When he is under pres-sure it is often the forehand that breaks down.

Marin is a player that quickly moves up to the net. He doesn’t hesitate when he gets a short ball and has very good technique with his approach shots. Marin is also efficient with his serve. Considering he is 1,98m tall, it goes without saying that he has a potentially huge serve. He has worked hard to develop a solid serve that finds its mark 60% of the time (first serves), and it has great variation. Let me point out though that I think his second serve

is still not good enough. He kicks it system-atically, and goes for his opponent’s backhand way too often, and it’s also not deep enough. This shot definitely needs some work.

Comments:Marin Cilic is a very complete player that cov-ers the court exceptionally well, misses very few shots and is able to dominate from both wings. Generally he is very solid, but he still lacks penetration in his shots. I’d like to see him hurt his opponents more, opening up the court and hitting more winners. His serve is excellent but is still missing some power that I know he can deliver. He rarely serves faster than 200km/h, which is amazing considering his size. His second serve, like I mentioned earlier, needs work, but can be a real weapon if he uses more spin and depth.

Conclusion:Marin’s game is like him: applied, serious, workmanlike. In order for him to impose him-self in Grand Slams, however, he will have to work even harder. He needs to build up a more significant arsenal of weapons and needs to develop more power – he needs to add some wildness to his game. In some ways he is the anti-Gonzalez. Gonzalez has the firepower and the wildness, but his game lacks structure. Marin is the exact opposite. That being said, Marin is only 20 years old and already is 10th in the world. He still has a lot to learn but we can be sure that he will work hard to learn what he needs to.


It might not be as ancient as the Canadian Open, Monte Carlo and Cincinnati. It might not be as richly endowed as Miami and In-

dian Wells, or have the shine of the newcomers Shanghai and Madrid – but the Internazionali d’Italia is one of the most prestigious tourna-ments outside of the Grand Slams. Back in the early days of the Open Era, it could even mea-sure up to – if not quite compete with – Roland Garros itself.

It would often upstage the Australian Open in boasting a much more talented field of players, as a quick perusal at the event’s hall of fame demonstrates. Among the finalists at the Foro Italico between 1969 and 1980, only two (1975 winner Ramirez and 1977 finalist Zugarelli)

were never successful at a Grand Slam. During the same period, six players would reach the finals of Roland Garros but never win a Slam, and at the Australian Open seven men would reach the championship match, but never be-come champions. Even those who did win the Slams weren’t guaranteed a successful career, and players like Mark Edmondson (1976) and Brian Teacher (1980) were never able to reach the year-end Top Ten.

In the years since, the Australian Open has raised its standards considerably and is now a fantastic Slam event. At the same time, the other Majors have widened the gap between themselves and the rest of the calendar to such a degree that there is no longer any point in

comparing them to normal events. Bearing that in mind, Rome has had to readjust its goals in recent decades, especially in the face of com-petition from newer tournaments like Miami and Madrid. The challenge from Madrid seems particularly ominous, since moving the event from the autumn to spring has required the In-ternazionali d’Italia to adjust its own schedule to accommodate it. This has resulted in less fa-vourable weather conditions and a bigger gap between it and Roland Garros.

Prize money might be one way of measuring the prestige of a tournament, but it is definitely not the most important one. Consider the case of Wimbledon: it is the most anticipated tour-nament of the whole year, and it has nothing

to do with the amount of money on offer. It is the oldest Slam, with the richest traditions and the greatest champion’s list in the sport. Many measure the worth of the best players of all time by their success at this tournament alone.

If we were to use these criteria to measure the importance of the Masters 1000 events – tradi-tion, history and the quality of past champions – the Internazionali d’Italia is without doubt one of the best, if not the best, tournaments in its class.

The event was born 1930, the brainchild of an Italian tennis enthusiast from Lom-bardy, Count Alberto Bonacossa. It was

relocated from Milan to the Foro Italico in

1935, and the tournament was suspended the following year thanks to international hostility against Italy following its invasion of Ethiopia. It was only in 1950 that the tournament began again. Success immediately returned to the In-ternazionali d’Italia thanks to the commitment of a talented organiser named Carlo Dalla Vida. In fact, the Roman event immediately acquired considerable prominence in the tennis world, as proven by the fact that the first five editions of the revitalised event went to Grand Slam winners like Jaroslav Drobny, Frank Sedgman and Budge Patty.

In the years that followed the tournament consolidated its position on the tennis circuit. Much of its incredible success can be attrib-

uted to the great strength of Italian tennis at the time. They secured eight victories in the European zone between 1949 and 1961, and two consecutive finals at the end of this period.

In the nineteen seasons that were to follow before the start of the Open Era, every win-ner (with one exception) of the Internazionali d’Italia was a Top Ten player at some point in their career. The women’s competition enjoyed similar success, with three victories for Marga-ret Smith, as many for Maria Esther Bueno, two for Doris Hart and one each for Maureen Con-nolly and Althea Gibson.

The Open era did nothing to halt the tourna-ment’s incredible record, and in 1971 the


42 TENNISWORLD SA TENNISWORLD SA 43TENNISWORLD SA 43

field at the Foro Italico outshone that of Ro-land Garros. It featured twelve Grand Slam winners (against nine for the French Open), including Rod Laver, John Newcombe, Roy Emerson and Tony Roche. The next years also saw Billy Jean King, Evonne Goolagong and Chris Evert victorious in the women’s tourna-ment.

A few signs of crisis emerged in the 80’s. For a few years the field at the men’s event was poor, and the women’s tournament was moved around several times, and wasn’t played at all in 1986. However, the downturn was tempo-rary, and since 1987 the women have been back at the Foro and both competitions have continually stood just behind the Slams in terms of prestige.

Since 1950, 72% of the victors at Rome had already won Slams or would go on to do so. If we only consider the Open

Era, the number rises to 78%. The women’s side of things nicely mirrors the men’s, with 74% of Internazionali d’Italia champions being of Grand Slam calibre. On average, every four years the Roman tournament and the French Open have the same winner. Moreover, the hall of fame at the Internazionali also features all of the French Open winners who have won that Slam more than three times – Bjorn Borg, Ivan Lendl, Mats Wilander, Gustavo Kuerten and Rafael Nadal.Seventeen others have won both the Rome Masters and the French Open, including Rod Laver and Andre Agassi. In 90% of the cases, the winner of the tournament features in the

Top Ten at some point.

No other Masters 1000 – and, more broadly, no other tournament aside from the Slams and the year-end Masters – boasts such impres-sive numbers. Miami and Indian Wells, the two American springtime events, can com-pete with Rome in terms of winners ranked in the Top Ten and Slam-calibre winners. That being said, both events were only born in the 1980s, and Rome has sustained its credentials for a much longer period of time.

The two summer events in North America – Canada and Cincinnati – have histories as long as Roma, but their record, especially pri-or to the Open Era, is far less impressive. The Paris Masters in Bercy joined the fray in 1986, but only about half of its champions have ever

seen their names on a Slam trophy. Madrid and Shanghai are so young that their records can’t really be compared to that of Rome.

The Monte Carlo Masters has for long been the Internazionali’s main competition. Cre-ated in 1897, its early years saw the most ac-claimed champions of the time, such as the brothers Doherty and Tony Wilding. Even in the years between the two World Wars the prestigious victories continued – Henri Cochet won twice, Bill Tilden once and Gottfried von Cramm twice. The glory days wouldn’t last

forever though, and between 1953 and 1965 the tournament winner was ranked in the Top Ten only once. The event bounced back strongly in the Open Era, however, when the clay specialists made the principality one of their favourite destinations.

Since 1950, Monte Carlo has recorded 36 successes by Slam winners (versus 43 in Rome), and 37 victories by Top

Ten players(versus 54). The two tournaments share many champions, like Sedgman, Borg, Wilander, Lendl and Nadal, but Rome features the likes of Hoad, Laver, Newcombe, Sampras

and Agassi, who never won Monte Carlo. So the Internazionali more than make up for its “youth” (when compared to Monte Carlo) with its high quality over the last sixty years.

With Rome having given us so much over the years, what can we possibly ask of it in 2010? Just the same thing we’ve always asked: a great champion. With a certain Spaniard on the war path, it’s likely that we’ll get our wish. But we can’t help that feel that a certain Swiss maestro is due a win here. He came breathtakingly close in 2006, where he was finally conquered by Nadal after five hours of brutal play. Perhaps this will be his year.

42 TENNISWORLD SA42 TENNISWORLD SA TENNISWORLD SA 43


ATP SINGLES RANKINGS ATP DOUBLES RANKINGS5 April 2010 5 April 2010

Federer,!Roger (SUI)Age: 28Title: 113W – 3L POINTS 10,765

Nestor,!Daniel!(CAN)Age: 37Title: 218W - 5L POINTS 12,280

Nadal,!Rafael!(ESP) Age: 23Title: 016W - 4L POINTS 6,980

Bryan,!Bob!(USA) Age: 31Title: 214W - 4L POINTS 9,940

Davydenko,!Nikolay!(RUS) Age: 28Title: 114W - 3L POINTS 5,335

Paes,!Leander!(IND) Age: 36Title: 115W - 5L POINTS 6,520

Tsonga,!Jo-Wilfried!(FRA) Age: 24Title: 014W - 6L POINTS 2,915

Aspelin,!Simon!(SWE) Age: 35Title: 115W - 5L POINTS 3,910

Djokovic,!Novak!(SRB) Age: 22Title: 115W - 4L POINTS 7,630

Zimonjic,!Nenad!(SRB) Age: 33Title: 217W - 6L POINTS 12,280

Del Potro,!Juan Martin!(ARG) Age: 21Title: 03W - 1L POINTS 5,735

Dlouhy,!Lukas!(CZE) Age: 27Title: 14W - 5L POINTS 7,145

Cilic,!Marin!(CRO) Age: 21Title: 220W - 4L POINTS 2,980

Moodie,!Wesley!(RSA) Age: 31Title: 01W - 4L POINTS 4,415

Soderling,!Robin!(SWE) Age: 25Title: 116W - 5L POINTS 4,595

Knowles,!Mark!(BAH) Age: 38Title: 02W - 3L POINTS 5,315

Murray,!Andy!(GBR) Age: 22Title: 010W - 4L POINTS 5,845

Bryan,!Mike!(USA) Age: 31Title: 213W - 4L POINTS 9,940

Roddick,!Andy!(USA) Age: 27Title: 226W - 4L POINTS 4,780

Bhupathi,!Mahesh!(IND) Age: 35Title: 07W - 6L POINTS 5,530

11 Gonzalez,!Fernando!(CHI)12 Verdasco,!Fernando!(ESP)13 Youzhny,!Mikhail!(RUS)14 Ljubicic,!Ivan!(CRO)15 Ferrero,!Juan Carlos!(ESP)16 Berdych,!Tomas!(CZE)17 Ferrer,!David!(ESP)18 Monfils,!Gael!(FRA)19 Stepanek,!Radek!(CZE)20 Haas,!Tommy!(USA)21 Isner,!John!(USA)22 Robredo,!Tommy!(ESP)23 Wawrinka,!Stanislas!(SUI)24 Monaco,!Juan!(ARG)25 Querrey,!Sam!(USA)26 Simon,!Gilles!(FRA)27 Hewitt,!Lleyton!(AUS)28 Melzer,!Jurgen!(AUT)29 Karlovic,!Ivo!(CRO)30 Baghdatis,!Marcos!(CYP)31 Bellucci,!Thomaz!(BRA)32 Montanes,!Albert!(ESP)33 Kohlschreiber,!Philipp!(GER)34 Almagro,!Nicolas!(ESP)35 Lopez,!Feliciano!(ESP)36 Benneteau,!Julien!(FRA)37 Troicki,!Viktor!(SRB)38 Tipsarevic,!Janko!(SRB)39 Becker,!Benjamin!(GER)40 Garcia-Lopez,!Guillermo!(ESP)41 Andreev,!Igor!(RUS)42 Kubot,!Lukasz!(POL)43 Hanescu,!Victor!(ROU)44 Chardy,!Jeremy!(FRA)45 Gulbis,!Ernests!(LAT)46 Mayer,!Florian!(GER)47 Seppi,!Andreas!(ITA)48 Mathieu,!Paul-Henri!(FRA)49 Petzschner,!Philipp!(GER)50 Berrer,!Michael!(GER)51 Blake,!James!(USA)52 Cuevas,!Pablo!(URU)53 Beck,!Andreas!(GER)54 Zeballos,!Horacio!(ARG)55 Rochus,!Olivier!(BEL)56 Fognini,!Fabio!(ITA)57 Serra,!Florent!(FRA)58 Greul,!Simon!(GER)59 Chiudinelli,!Marco!(SUI)60 Korolev,!Evgeny!(KAZ)61 Schwank,!Eduardo!(ARG)62 Mayer,!Leonardo!(ARG)63 Lacko,!Lukas!(SVK)64 Llodra,!Michael!(FRA)65 Robert,!Stephane!(FRA)66 Stakhovsky,!Sergiy!(UKR)67 Gicquel,!Marc!(FRA)68 Falla,!Alejandro!(COL)69 Sela,!Dudi!(ISR)70 Dolgopolov Jr.,!Oleksandr!(UKR)71 Nieminen,!Jarkko!(FIN)72 Russell,!Michael!(USA)73 Starace,!Potito!(ITA)74 Gasquet,!Richard!(FRA)75 Luczak,!Peter!(AUS)76 de Bakker,!Thiemo!(NED)77 Marchenko,!Illya!(UKR)78 Beck,!Karol!(SVK)79 Istomin,!Denis!(UZB)80 Clement,!Arnaud!(FRA)81 Hajek,!Jan!(CZE)82 Chela,!Juan Ignacio!(ARG)83 Giraldo,!Santiago!(COL)84 Hernandez,!Oscar!(ESP)85 Ram,!Rajeev!(USA)86 Zverev,!Mischa!(GER)87 Granollers,!Marcel!(ESP)88 Golubev,!Andrey!(KAZ)89 Malisse,!Xavier!(BEL)90 Lorenzi,!Paolo!(ITA)91 Schuettler,!Rainer!(GER)92 Gimeno-Traver,!Daniel!(ESP)93 Koellerer,!Daniel!(AUT)94 Massu,!Nicolas!(CHI)95 Darcis,!Steve!(BEL)96 Brands,!Daniel!(GER)97 Fish,!Mardy!(USA)98 Lu,!Yen-Hsun!(TPE)99 Lapentti,!Nicolas!(ECU)100 Kavcic,!Blaz!(SLO)

11 Norman,!Dick!(BEL)12 Kubot,!Lukasz!(POL)13 Marach,!Oliver!(AUT)14 Mertinak,!Michal!(SVK)15 Ram,!Andy!(ISR)16 Matkowski,!Marcin!(POL)17 Fyrstenberg,!Mariusz!(POL)18 Mirnyi,!Max!(BLR)19 Cermak,!Frantisek!(CZE)20 Hanley,!Paul!(AUS)21 Robredo,!Tommy!(ESP)22 Granollers,!Marcel!(ESP)23 Soares,!Bruno!(BRA)24 Melzer,!Jurgen!(AUT)25 Knowle,!Julian!(AUT)26 Benneteau,!Julien!(FRA)27 Ullyett,!Kevin!(ZIM)28 Kohlmann,!Michael!(GER)29 Butorac,!Eric!(USA)30 Lindstedt,!Robert!(SWE)31 Kerr,!Jordan!(AUS)32 Brunstrom,!Johan!(SWE)33 Rojer,!Jean-Julien!(AHO)34 Polasek,!Filip!(SVK)35 Kas,!Christopher!(GER)36 Ram,!Rajeev!(USA)37 Querrey,!Sam!(USA)38 Tsonga,!Jo-Wilfried!(FRA)39 Lopez,!Marc!(ESP)40 Damm,!Martin!(CZE)41 Fish,!Mardy!(USA)42 Tecau,!Horia!(ROU)43 Melo,!Marcelo!(BRA)44 Cuevas,!Pablo!(URU)45 Llodra,!Michael!(FRA)46 Levinsky,!Jaroslav!(CZE)47 Vemic,!Dusan!(SRB)48 Clement,!Arnaud!(FRA)49 Isner,!John!(USA)50 Zeballos,!Horacio!(ARG)

The national ranking is the average ranking of the 3 best players of each country

The national ranking is the average ranking of the 3 best players of each country

Spain: 10 USA: 16Croatia: 17,6France: 18Russia: 20 Serbia: 25,6 Switzerland: 27,6Argentina: 27,6 Czech Republic: 38,6Germany: 39,3 South Africa: 205,6

12 3 4 56 7 8 9

10

Usa: 11,6 Poland: 15Austria: 20,6Czech Republic: 21,3Spain: 27,3India: 28 France: 36,3Serbia: 37,6Brazil: 40,6Australia: 41,3 South Africa: 58,6

12 3 4 56 7 8 9

10

NATIONAL ATP Singles

NATIONAL ATP Doubles


Sony Ericsson WTA Tour Doubles Rankings 5 April 2010

Sony Ericsson WTA Tour Singles Rankings 5 April 2010

Williams, Serena (USA)Age: 29Title: 110W - 1L POINTS 7,946

Black, Cara (ZIM)Age: 31Title: 220W - 4L POINTS 9,015

Williams, Venus (USA) Age: 30Title: 219W - 2L POINTS 5,876

Safina, Dinara (RUS) Age: 24Title: 04W - 2L POINTS 6,150

Williams, Serena (USA) Age: 29Title: 16W - 0L POINTS 7,440

Jankovic, Jelena (SRB) Age: 25Title: 113W - 5L POINTS 4,900

Martinez Sanchez, Maria Jose (ESP) Age: 28Title: 19W - 5L POINTS 6,410

Kleybanova, Alisa (RUS) Age: 21Title: 011W - 6L POINTS 4,585

Wozniacki, Caroline (DEN) Age: 20Title: 012W - 5L POINTS 6,375

Huber, Liezel (USA) Age: 34Title: 221W - 4L POINTS 9,015

Dementieva, Elena (RUS) Age: 29Title: 217W - 5L POINTS 4,965

Stosur, Samantha (AUS) Age: 26Title: 010W - 4L POINTS 6,505

Clijsters, Kim (BEL) Age: 27Title: 214W - 2L POINTS 3,860

Petrova, Nadia (RUS) Age: 28Title: 012W - 5L POINTS 5,155

Azarenka, Victoria (BLR) Age: 21Title: 014W - 5L POINTS 4,070

Stubbs, Rennae (AUS) Age: 39Title: 08W - 5L POINTS 6,065

Kuznetsova, Svetlana (RUS) Age: 29Title: 217W - 5L POINTS 5,620

Williams, Venus (USA) Age: 30Title: 16W - 0L POINTS 7,440

Radwanska, Agnieszka (POL) Age: 21Title: 014W - 6L POINTS 4,190

Llagostera Vives, Nuria (ESP) Age: 30Title: 19W - 4L POINTS 6,410

11 Stosur, Samantha AUS12 Bartoli, Marion FRA13 Wickmayer, Yanina BEL14 Sharapova, Maria RUS15 Li, Na CHN16 Pennetta, Flavia ITA17 Schiavone, Francesca ITA18 Petrova, Nadia RUS19 Peer, Shahar ISR20 Rezai, Aravane FRA21 Zheng, Jie CHN22 Zvonareva, Vera RUS23 Henin, Justine BEL24 Hantuchova, Daniela SVK25 Bondarenko, Alona UKR26 Kleybanova, Alisa RUS27 Lisicki, Sabine GER28 Martinez Sanchez, M. Jose ESP29 Cibulkova, Dominika SVK30 Pavlyuchenkova, Anastasia RUS31 Kirilenko, Maria RUS32 Bondarenko, Kateryna UKR33 Vesnina, Elena RUS34 Razzano, Virginie FRA35 Szavay, Agnes HUN36 Cirstea, Sorana ROU37 Dulko, Gisela ARG38 Suarez Navarro, Carla ESP39 Wozniak, Aleksandra CAN40 Safarova, Lucie CZE41 Oudin, Melanie USA42 Medina Garrigues, Anabel ESP43 Errani, Sara ITA44 Shvedova, Yaroslava KAZ45 Petkovic, Andrea GER46 Dushevina, Vera RUS47 Czink, Melinda HUN48 Dulgheru, Alexandra ROU49 Schnyder, Patty SUI50 Bacsinszky, Timea SUI51 Hercog, Polona SLO52 Govortsova, Olga BLR53 Rybarikova, Magdalena SVK54 Vinci, Roberta ITA55 Garbin, Tathiana ITA56 Bammer, Sybille AUT57 Ivanovic, Ana SRB58 Peng, Shuai CHN59 Baltacha, Elena GBR60 Kvitova, Petra CZE61 Date Krumm, Kimiko JPN62 Sevastova, Anastasija LAT63 Makarova, Ekaterina RUS64 Martic, Petra CRO65 Groenefeld, Anna-lena GER66 Kerber, Angelique GER67 Kulikova, Regina RUS68 Flipkens, Kirsten BEL69 Voegele, Stefanie SUI70 Benesova, Iveta CZE71 Goerges, Julia GER72 Arvidsson, Sofia SWE73 Hradecka, Lucie CZE74 Tanasugarn, Tamarine THA75 King, Vania USA76 Zahlavova Strycova, Barbora CZE77 Zakopalova, Klara CZE78 Kudryavtseva, Alla RUS79 Brianti, Alberta ITA80 Coin, Julie FRA81 Olaru, Ioana Raluca ROU82 Malek, Tatjana GER83 Chakvetadze, Anna RUS84 Cornet, Alize FRA85 Zahlavova, Sandra CZE86 Parra Santonja, Arantxa ESP87 Barrois, Kristina GER88 Morita, Ayumi JPN89 Chang, Kai-chen TPE90 Mirza, Sania IND91 Sprem, Karolina CRO92 Chan, Yung-jan TPE93 Craybas, Jill USA94 Rodionova, Anastasia AUS95 Meusburger, Yvonne AUT96 Amanmuradova, Akgul UZB97 Duque Marino, Mariana COL98 Parmentier, Pauline FRA99 Kutuzova, Viktoriya UKR100 Perry, Shenay USA

11 Ruano Pascual, Virginia ESP12 Mattek-sands, Bethanie USA13 Peng, Shuai CHN14 Zheng, Jie CHN15 Hsieh, Su-wei TPE16 Peschke, Kveta CZE17 Yan, Zi CHN18 Medina Garrigues, Anabel ESP19 Raymond, Lisa USA20 Makarova, Ekaterina RUS21 Kirilenko, Maria RUS22 Dulko, Gisela ARG23 Pennetta, Flavia ITA24 Vesnina, Elena RUS25 Schiavone, Francesca ITA26 Chan, Yung-jan TPE27 Zahlavova Strycova, Barbora CZE28 King, Vania USA29 Niculescu, Monica ROU30 Benesova, Iveta CZE31 Chuang, Chia-jung TPE32 Hantuchova, Daniela SVK33 Groenefeld, Anna-lena GER34 Azarenka, Victoria BLR35 Radwanska, Agnieszka POL36 Kudryavtseva, Alla RUS37 Srebotnik, Katarina SLO38 Hradecka, Lucie CZE39 Kops-jones, Raquel USA40 Amanmuradova, Akgul UZB41 Rodionova, Anastasia AUS42 Garbin, Tathiana ITA43 Dushevina, Vera RUS44 Mirza, Sania IND45 Hlavackova, Andrea CZE46 Jans, Klaudia POL47 Schnyder, Patty SUI48 Rosolska, Alicja POL49 Spears, Abigail USA50 Bondarenko, Alona UKR

The national ranking is the average ranking of the

The national ranking is the average ranking of the

3 best players of each country

3 best players of each country

Russia 4,6 Usa 15,3Belgium 15,3France 22Italy 25,3China 31,3Slovakia 35,3Spain 36 Ukraine 52 Czech Republic 56,6 South Africa 361,3

12 3 4 56 7 8 9

10

USA 2,3Spain 8 Russia 13China 14,6Australia 18Taipei 24Czech Republic 24,3Italy 30 Poland 43Belarus 49,6 South Africa 154,3

12 3 4 56 7 8 9

10

NATIONAL WTA Singles

NATIONAL WTA Doubles


Lionel Eric Tapscott “Doodles” (born 18 March 1894 in Kimberley, South Africa) was a South African cricket player who played in a few tests in 1923. His other passion in life was tennis, and his talent earned him a sum-mons as the South African representative at the 1912 Olympic Games, where he did well for a number of rounds before losing in five sets to Bohemian Ladislav Zemla-Razny.

Sheila Piercey (born 18 March 1919) was a South African tennis player who was also known as Sheila Piercey-Summers after her marriage. Alongside her fellow countryman Eric Sturgess she won three Grand Slam mixed doubles titles: at Roland Garros in 1947 and 1949, and at Wimbledon in 1949.

Raymond “Ray” Moore (born 24 August 1946 in Johannesburg) is a former South Af-rican professional tennis player. During his career he won 8 doubles titles and reached twelve finals. Moore took part in twelve Davis Cup ties for South Africa between 1967 and 1977. As the President of PM Sports Manage-ment, he was instrumental in transforming the Indian Wells tournament from the dusty dream of some 35 years ago to one of the most brilliant tournaments in tennis. Moore does not agree with today’s robotic women’s

tennis, which he says seems to have come out of a production chain. A great champion of wom-en’s tennis, he acknowledges the absence of women players who quit too soon, such as Amelie Mauresmo, and views Henin and Clijsters’ return very positively. Always sporting a fashionable haircut, not too tall, but athleti-cally very strong, Moore tasted his first victories with a Spald-ing ‘Richard Pancho Gonzales’ in his hand. Few may know that Spalding designer Ralph Vincent Sawyer was the creator of many racquet frames since the 1950s. Later on the artist became a great designer and also worked for Bancroft, where he designed the legendary “Player Special” used by Martina Navratilova. Ray Moore also had great success in the 1970s with a Wilson T3000 similar to the one used by Jimmy Connors.

Rosalyn Fairbank (born 2 No-vember 1960 in Durban) has been living in San Diego for many years. She turned professional in 1978 and in 1990 achieved her best WTA ranking of 15. She won one singles title in her career (Richmond 1983) and numerous doubles titles. Her passion for tennis and sports in general drove her to write a successful book called Playing Tennis To Win The Mental Advantage.

George H. Dodd was a talented South African tennis player in the 1920’s who, alongside Black-beard, formed part of an almost invincible team. In 1920 he took part in the Olympic Games in Antwerp, where he was stopped in the quarter-finals by Japanese player Ichiya Kumagae after defeating then French number one Max Décugis. He lived in England for a long time but always travelled the world with

his family in tow, carrying with him a camera which he used to film everything from fam-ily scenes to sporting events. A number of his 8mm films were recently auctioned on a popular e-commerce network. Some of them feature tennis footage from Wimbledon in the 1950’s.

REFRESHINGLY UNIQUE!In 140 countries, Perrier offers the strongest natural bubbling experience. Its distinctive bottle

continues to be an icon worldwide. Perrier is a world leader in sparkling water.

Low in sodium content and with neutral taste, it is the natural drink that sparkles like no other.

RH5920 REDHERRING 011 234 0951

www.patleys.co.za


Mentally Preparing for the Perfect Serve

It’s All in the Mind

EIGHT SECONDSThe serve is one of the most important strokes in tennis, and it doesn’t rely simply on your technique. It all starts in the head – here’s how to use it best.

Step one to hitting a fantastic serve is vi-sualisation. Look at where you want to hit the serve and in your mind’s eye see yourself placing it exactly where you want it. Then measure how hard you want to hit the ball, how much power you feel the shot needs. Both of these images are already inside of you: stored somewhere in your brain is the memory of a time you hit a perfect serve. All you need to do is remember that serve, and imagine doing it again.

By performing these exercises you are relying on something called “muscle memory”. There are two kinds of muscle memory, and a good example of the first kind is riding a bicycle. Everyone knows the expressions “it’s just like riding a bike”, and this kind of muscle memory is stored for very long periods of time. Gener-ally a person will never forget how to do that certain action.

The second kind of muscle memory is known as “short term” memory. Thoughts and sen-sations associated with this type disappear from our bodies and minds at a rate of about 30% every eight seconds. An example of this

type of memory is a pinch: in eight seconds about one third of the feeling is lost. In the next eight seconds another third of what is left goes and on and on until there is nothing left to feel. Most humans operate with this same eight second clock so it is called the “time constant” of short-term memory.

Short-term muscle memory is very important for a serve – if you remember how you just hit that ace, and visualise how you did it, chances are you can do it again if you con-centrate. Once a person can truly “feel” their serve without thinking about it, it has become part of the long-term muscle memory, and it will be like riding a bike for many years. Much has been written about the mental processes that go on in the minds of strong servers, but it is a very controversial topic. Some of them focus on “feeling the rhythm” of the serve as if it were a melody, while others try to focus on physical characteristics, such as a certain way of standing. Whichever method is used, essentially it is about having a mental image of the movement and the senses involved in the perfect serve, and focusing on those just before the ball is struck.

Good servers have another thing in common: they have a very particular purpose for each serve. They always want to hit the ace or un-returnable serve, and they truly believe that they can.

IMPROVING YOUR MUSCLE MEMORY

Exercise 1Carry out a series of serves, paying particular attention to the following:

1) Together with your coach, choose two tech-nical or technical-tactical objectives, making sure you have a primary and a secondary one2) Execute the first serve and focus on the pri-mary objective and partially on the secondary one3) Maintain the follow-through position for one or two seconds in order to retain as much of the feeling in your memory as possible4) Try to execute the next serve no later than eight seconds after the first5) Before hitting the second serve, refocus on the primary and secondary objectives6) Repeat the cycle

Exercise 2Pay particular attention to the manage-ment of the time between one serve and another:

1) Take 3-4 seconds to breathe and recov-er physiologically from the previous point2) Take 3-4 seconds to decide how to set up, in broad terms, the point that you are about to play3) Make a decision: it is crucial to know what we want to do before we act4) Check your activation state: check if you are poorly energised or too nervous5) If you are too nervous, breathe deeply for 3-4 sec-onds. Breathe with your stomach, not your chest6) If you are too relaxed, hop a few times be-fore serving and breathe with your chest, not your stomach7) Hit your serve. It is crucial to have no thoughts in one’s mind at the moment of execu-tion, except perhaps about the next shot

BABOLATwith Rafa and Dinara

Rafa

el N

adal

(Esp

) Aer

opro

Driv

e ra

cque

t, Pr

o Hu

rrica

ne s

tring

- Di

nara

Safi

na

(Rus

) Aer

o St

orm

racq

uet,

Pro

Hurri

cane

stri

ng#1

ATP

& W

TA a

s of

Apr

il 20

th 2

009

- Pho

tos

G. L

ivin

- R. A

ngle

BABOLATwith Rafa and Dinara #1


Most tennis players will at some point in their careers suffer from shoulder pain or injuries. It is the most common over-

use injury of the upper limb in tennis players. High profile players like Maria Sharapova have regularly struggled with their shoulders, which has lead to a lot of attention being focused on this type of injury. Shoulder pain is almost ex-clusively caused by the service action in tennis. The serve is the most important shot in tennis, not only because it sets up so many points but it also accounts for 45% of all the shots in tournament play. Shoulder injuries also plague other sports with overhead throwing actions like baseball, handball, javelin and cricket. A lot of research has been done on the shoulder in sports medicine and we are still not entirely sure about the cause of shoulder injuries in ten-nis players.

We also did a study at the 2007 SA Senior In-terprovincial tournament on 76 players, 20 of which had a history of shoulder pain related to tennis. In these players we could not find any specific factors that could cause shoulder inju-ries when we looked at service speed, grip po-sitions, level of play, years of playing and differ-ence in range of motion. Our studies confirmed a difference in range of motion in the dominant shoulder of the tennis players we tested, which is the same finding as a study in the USA which focused on baseball players.

Shoulder injuries in tennis players are overuse injuries caused by the service action and it should be prevented. A tight posterior (back-side) joint capsule with a relative muscle im-balance in rotator cuff muscles is the cause for shoulder injuries in tennis players.

It is important for tennis players to have the right technique and to remember the kinetic

chain of the body that leads to a great serve. There are certain professional tennis

players with abbreviated service actions that

can gener-ate a lot

of speed on the serve,

but they are also the ones with more shoulder problems. Young players and coaches should not try short cuts when it comes to the service action and when it comes to focus on core ex-ercises.

There are other causes for shoulder pain in younger players, such as stress fractures. For older players osteo-arthritis, inflammatory ar-thritis and frozen shoulder might also be fac-tors.

When players start to develop shoulder symp-toms on the serve, the following adjustments in technique and conditioning should be made:

- Make the service toss-up position more to the right (for right handed players)- Focus rhythm of service, timing and leg drive- Change grip position on the racket to number two or one - Start a posterior capsule stretch program - Start a rotator cuff strengthening program

Stretching must focus on the joint capsule at the back of the shoulder and not on the front part of the shoulder. Physiotherapy, ice and non-steroidal anti-inflammatories can also be helpful with acute injuries.

If the pain does not improve with a good stretching and strengthening program and the help of a physiotherapist or biokineticist, there could be other underlying causes for the shoul-der pain and a proper evaluation with X-rays must be done.

X-rays and diagnostic ultrasound can exclude other pathologies like subacromial bursal im-pingement, os acromiale and biceps tendonitis. When these special investigations are still in-conclusive, an MRI needs to be done to exclude pathology inside the shoulder joint.

There is a place for arthroscopic surgery in shoulder injuries, but the majority of cases should be managed with the help of a good tennis coach, physiotherapist and biokinetisist.

Shoulder Injuries in Tennis

The Federer VolleyWhen people talk about Roger Fe-

derer and his brilliance, you’ll of-ten hear about his high first serve

percentage, the effectiveness of his second serve, his heavy forehand, his textbook one-handed backhand, his balletic movement and his Borg-like coolness. Rarely will you hear about his volleys. Why is this?

I believe the game of tennis has moved away from coming to the net as a tactic for win-ning matches. Today it is only used as varia-tion and Federer is probably the best expo-nent of that. Many tennis lovers have been greatly frustrated by Federer in the past. He often loses against Nadal from the back of the court, but every time he comes to the net or serves and volleys he wins the point. Why does he not come to the net more often if he is winning most of the points there?

If you have been watching the duals be-tween Federer and Nadal over the past five years, you will know that Federer goes to net very selectively, probably because of his respect for Nadal’s passing shots. Most of Nadal’s passing shots off the backhand side go cross court, so why does Federer not ex-

ploit this weakness of Nadal’s more often? It seems that in Federer’s mind going to the net is an unnecessary risk.

We might see Federer coming to net more often as he gets older because the length of some of the rallies he plays now will catch up to him. In the future it is likely that he will be looking to shorten his points, and coming to net is a good way doing this. The Federer volley up-close:His basic technique on both volleys is very good. He makes it look very easy and some-times acts very casually as he plays the shot. Because the volley is one of the most dif-ficult shots in tennis, a lack of intensity on the shot will lead to mistakes, and Federer is often guilty of this. Having said that, he has great feel around the net, as his doubles success clearly proves. Federer’s forehand volley is very effective and he wins a lot of points with this shot. I think mostly because his movement is so good and the link between good movement and success on the volley is essential. He has three weaknesses on the forehand side:

- The distance between his head and the racquet head is too big, and this hurts him on low volleys.- He pulls his left shoulder out just before he makes contact with the ball, and this makes the volley go down into the net.- He uses “hands” in the shot, which means he breaks his wrist upon contact. You have to be strong to do this, and he is.

Federer’s backhand volley looks to be the weaker shot of the two, but is still very good. Once again, his great movement hides his few weaknesses on the shot:- His backswing is slightly too long and too high, this makes it difficult for him to get enough stick on the ball.- He “over-slices” the volley. He does the same thing on his regular backhand slice, which is a result of the high backswing I already mentioned. It sounds terrible to mention any weakness in Federer’s game, seeing as he is the best player of all time. But he’ll need to work on this shot in the coming years, since he’ll probably need to use it a lot more, so it’s worth considering.

TENNISWORLD SA 53

By Pietie NorvalBy Dr. Morkel


The last couple of editions we talked all about training. This month I want to focus on the other side of the coin: recovery and regeneration. Do you think recovery is as im-portant as training? Do you spend as much time recovering as you do training?

Most athletes perform two or more training sessions per day at demanding intensities. During these sessions it sometimes happens that athletes push themselves beyond their physiological and psychological limits. This is the only way to reach new heights. On top of that they still have lives outside of tennis and will experience stress factors there as well. This will definitely increase the stress experienced during training or competition. Therefore it is vitally important that tennis

players maintain a good balance between their social lives, training sessions and re-covery periods.

Many coaches and trainers have said in the past that the harder you train the better you will become (“no pain no gain”). Although there is merit in this statement there is a fine line to take note of. The “how” and “when” factors come into play here, and if training is approached in the wrong way the athlete will not reach the performance levels he/she desires.

Let’s take a closer look at recovery and how it can help you as well as what you can do from your side to incorporate this into your preparation.

Recovery is a multi-dimensional process that depends on intrinsic and extrinsic fac-tors. Therefore it is much more complicated than most people realise. Maybe this is the reason that most athletes and coaches just decide to skip on it completely. Here are a few factors to be considered when you think about recovery:

1.AGEa.Older than 25 needs longer recovery peri-ods after training.b.Younger than 18 needs longer rest be-tween workouts to facilitate overcompen-sation (Nudel 1989; Rowland 1990; Shoner-Kolb 1990).

2.EXPERIENCEa.Experienced athletes will recuperate soon-er due to faster physiological adaptation and more efficient movement (Noakes 1991).

3.GENDERa.Male tennis players recover faster than female tennis players mainly due to endocri-nological differences, in particular the male hormone testosterone which accelerates re-covery processes.

4.ENVIRONMENTALa.Altitude higher than 3000m causes recov-ery to take longer.b.Extreme cold conditions slow recovery due to impaired Human Growth Hormone and Testosterone production at sub-maximal loads.

5.PSYCHOLOGICALa.Factors such as negative coaching styles, fear, indecisiveness, lack of determination by a coach/trainer might stress the athlete or make him/her feel insecure.b.This can spur physiological problems such as

Obviously recovery and recuperation are not to be brushed aside. It will affect your ten-nis in a negative way if not looked after and managed properly. There are a multitude of recovery methods but I am only going to fo-cus on some that might be practical for you. I am breaking them up into Natural means of recovery and Physiotherapeutic means of recovery.

Natural Means of Recovery 1.ACTIVE REST (KINO THERAPY)

-

-

2.PASSIVE REST/COMPLETE RESTComplete rest is not there to replace active recovery but to complete the process. It must be done as follows:

Physiotherapeutic Means of Recovery 1.MASSAGEMassage is the systematic manipulation of soft body tissues and assists in removing toxic energy metabolism by-products and re-sidual fluid build-up resulting from structural damages of muscle tissue.

Kuprin (1982) addresses the need for mas-sage before, during and after training. Mas-sage is one of the oldest recovery methods

“THE HARDER YOU WORK, THE BETTER YOU WILL BECOME”

“Proper recovery accelerates the regeneration rates between training lessons, decreases fatigue, enhances super compensation, and facilitates using heavy loads in training. It can even decrease the number and frequency of injuries because fatigue impairs coordination and concentration, leading to poor movement control.

” Tudor Bompa


By Jaco Burger


around and certainly one of the most effective.

Benefits of massage include

2.CONTRAST BATHING/SHOWERINGThis method creates a pumping action within the muscle through alternating va-soconstriction (narrowing of blood vessels) and vasodilatation (widening of the blood vessels). This action penetrates muscle tis-sue to superficial depths. Believe it or not, this goes as far back as the gladiators of the Roman Empire. Keep the following in mind when performing contrast bathing:

-

I want to bring this a bit closer to home and make it relevant to you. If you have played junior tournaments in South Africa you will be aware of the tournament format and the load it places on your body. I have seen in the past number of years how players have to play up to three singles matches and 2 doubles matches in one day. This is an ex-treme example but it has happened a few times. The average I would guess is about 3 matches per day. This in itself is a lot of load on the body, especially if you still are a junior. The interesting thing is that people can’t understand why they get niggles and injuries. They look surprised when this hap-pens. Even more interesting is that tennis players more often than not don’t do any form of strength training and conditioning. In other words their bodies are not even properly prepared for this load.

This being said, the irony is that there is noth-ing in place to assist with recovery at tourna-ments. That is why I have tried in the last four years to travel to the tournaments that would allow me and set up a recovery station. Those of you who have been making use of this at the Super 7 and Nationals in Bloemfontein will know the difference it makes to your body when you get a sport massage every second day or so.

Just in closing here are what the current Da-vis Cup players have to say about recovery, sport massage and ice baths:

For me personally massage helps a lot to get rid of lactic acid in my body. When I don’t get massaged regularly I can feel how my body gets tighter and tighter until it gets to a point where my movement is influenced. Ice baths help a lot and makes me feel fresh after a training session, gets the blood flow going

Jeff Coetzee

After a hard training week I find it necessary to do an ice bath which helps in muscle recovery. I feel that a good massage helps even more to target specific problem ar-eas which have become stiff and tight during training. By combining ice baths and massages into your program you will recover faster and it will allow you to train harder the next day

zak van der Merwe

I hope that this will be of help to you and that you will make use of some of these ways of starting to recover more optimally. I am still working on taking recovery stations to every tournament in South Africa. I am positive that in time we will be successful in offering you this at every junior tournament around South Africa. If you are interested in finding out more about recovery and at which tournaments we will be going to this year or anything regarding strength and con-ditioning for tennis, please feel free to con-tact me at [email protected]



NORMAL SUBSCRIPTION RATES

Subscription Cost Saving12 months R430,00 10%

If you are a SATA member you qualify for a 12 month subscription at only R355

Email us to subscribe E-mail: [email protected]

Three lucky subscribers will each walk away with a racquet and a tour bag.

TennisWorldand WIN!!!

WINJuan Martin Del Potro’s new racket

(Wilson BLX Pro Tour Racket)&

Wilson BLX Super six racket bag

(Valued at R3500)

SUBSCRIBEto

Juan Martin Del Potro’s new racquet(Wilson BLX Pro Tour Raquet)

e-maile-mail


With the two North American Masters 1000 events behind us, it’s time once again to turn our attention to the European clay court season. As always the first major stop is in Monte Carlo, then it’s off to Rome, Madrid and finally the glorious dirt of

Roland Garros. By the time we get to the Parisian clay everyone has already forgotten the first tournaments, however, and rightly so. The Slams are all that matter, after all – they are at the four pillars that support the rest of the calendar, and without them the sport would have nothing to rally around. But what if we suddenly found ourselves without the Slams? Certain sports have had to face the spectre of breakaway leagues, such as the Indian Premier League in cricket, and other sports have seen repeated clashes between its governing bodies and players. The National Hockey League in the US, for example, saw a lockout in 2004 which caused the entire season to be cancelled. Could the same thing ever happen to tennis? Probably not. But if it did, and the Slams were suddenly excluded from the tour, which tournaments would rise to the top of the ATP schedule? Who would be the king of the new tour?

A World WithoutBy Enzo Cherici

One would imagine that if this were to hap-pen, the rankings wouldn’t change much. However, we had a look at the performance of the current Top 10 players in the past 20 Masters 1000 tournaments, and what we saw truly shocked us. The rankings would look a lot different, that’s for sure.

ATP Rankings

1 Federer 10765

2 Djokovic 7630

3 Nadal 6980

4 Murray 5845

5 Del Potro 5735

6 Davydenko 5585

7 Roddick 4780

8 Soderling 4595

9 Cilic 2980

10 Tsonga 2915

Points Breakdown W F SF QF R16 R32 R64 R128

Grand Slam 2000 1200 720 360 180 90 45 10

Masters 1000 1000 1000 600 360 180 90 45 10

Let’s first have a look at the way in which the ATP points are distributed across the Grand Slams and the Masters 1000 tournaments:

60 TENNISWORLD SA


Year Player Points Grand Slam Masters 1000

2009 Federer 10550 6400 3395

2009 Nadal 9205 2900 5280

2008 Indian Wells Miami Monte

Carlo Rome Hamburg Canada Cincinnati Madrid Indoor Paris Total Average

1 Nadal 360 600 1000 45 1000 1000 360 360 180 3905 433,88

2 Djokovic 1000 25 360 1000 360 180 600 90 90 3705 411,66

3 Murray 90 25 90 45 90 360 1000 1000 180 2880 320

4 Federer 360 180 600 180 600 45 90 360 180 2595 288,33

5 Davydenko 45 1000 360 90 90 90 45 45 360 2125 236,11

6 Tsonga 90 45 / 10 45 / / 90 1000 1280 213,33

7 Roddick 25 360 / 360 / 90 / 90 180 1105 184,16

8 Del Potro / 25 / 22* / / / 180 90 317 79,25

9 Soderling 25 45 45 25 90 90 90 45 45 500 55,55

10 Cilic 25 25 10 10 10 10 180 90 90 450 50

2009 Indian Wells Miami Monte

Carlo Rome Hamburg Canada Cincinnati Madrid Indoor Paris Total Average

1 Nadal 1000 180 1000 1000 600 180 360 600 360 5280 586,66

2 Djokovic 180 600 600 600 360 180 600 360 1000 4480 497,77

3 Murray 600 1000 360 45 180 1000 360 / 90 3635 454,77

4 Federer 360 360 90 360 1000 180 1000 / 45 3395 424,38

5 Del Potro 180 360 24 180 360 600 / 45 180 1950 243,75

6 Davydenko / / 180 45 90 180 90 1000 90 1675 239,28

7 Roddick 360 180 / / 180 360 45 45 / 1170 195

8 Tsonga 45 180 / 10 45 360 45 90 180 955 119,37

9 Soderling 25 25 10 90 45 / 10 180 180 575 71,87

10 Cilic 45 45 45 90 45 10 45 10 180 515 57,22

As we can see, each Grand Slam counts twice as much as a single Masters Series 1000 event. In order to match a Wimbledon win, for example, one would have to triumph at both Rome and Miami. A final at Roland Garros (1200 points), would be worth more than a victory at Indian Wells (1000 points). And a semi-final at the US Open (720 points) would surpass a hypotheti-cal final in Monte Carlo (600 points).

In short, if a player succeeded in winning all the Slams (of course an incredibly difficult achievement) they would get 8000 points, meaning that player would only need to pick up 2000-3000 points during the rest of the season to end the year as number one.To support this, let us briefly compare the 2009 performances of Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal.

The Swiss champion ended the year in the top position, with a total of 10 550 points. Of these, 6400 were derived from the four Slam tournaments (two victories and two finals) and only 3395 from eight Masters Series 1000 appearances (he did not play in Shanghai). The balance of the points was made up from the 250 event in Doha (semi-final) and the year-end ATP World Tour Final. In short, 60.6% of the points obtained by Federer in 2009 came from Slam tourna-ments, whereas only 32.1% were from Masters 1000 events.

Rafael Nadal’s case is quite different. The Mallorcan champion finished 2009 in second posi-tion, with 9205 points. Of these, only 2900 (31.5%) were obtained in Slam tournaments, and 5280 (57.3%) were earned in Masters 1000 events. It must be said that the Spaniard’s knee injury in mid June heavily affected his performance in the Slams along with the entire second half of the year. But even if he had hypothetically beaten Federer in a final at Wimbledon, he would have totalled fewer points in the four Majors (4900 versus 5600) than the Swiss cham-pion. In that case, though, he would have finished the year as number one. From these initial observations it is clear that the influence of the Slams – which, we should remember, only occupy two months of the season – on the world rankings can be overwhelming. But this is not true for everyone, as Nadal’s situation demonstrates. With Federer devouring Slam after Slam, the Masters 1000 events take on a special significance for everyone else.

To see what the ATP ranking would look like without Grand Slams, let’s have a look at the performance of the Top Ten in Masters 1000 tournaments in 2008, 2009 and in this first part of 2010.

2008 was a magical year for Nadal with the Paris-Wimbledon double and the gold medal at the Olympics. But, as can be seen in the table above, his performance in Masters 1000 tourna-ments was also extraordinary. With three victories (Monte Carlo, Hamburg and Canada) and one final (Miami), the Mallorcan ended the year in first place in this special Masters-focused ranking with 3905 points (433.88 on average over nine tournaments played). Somewhat sur-prisingly, in second place we don’t find Roger Federer but Novak Djokovic who, with his two victories (Indian Wells and Rome) and one final (Cincinnati), managed to collect 3705 points (411.66 on average). One step down and still no sign of Federer. Instead we see Andy Murray’s name, thanks to his victories in Cincinnati and Madrid: 2880 points for him (320 on average), but a long way from the first two places. To find the Slam King we have to go down to fourth place – Federer won no Master Series titles, and reached only two finals (Monte Carlo and Hamburg, he lost to Nadal in both). In the end he got only 2595 points (1310 less than Nadal). Davydenko also put in some good performances, winning in Miami and ultimately collect-ing 2125 points). Tsonga comes in at six with his win at Bercy, and Roddick disappointingly occupies the seventh slot, with no wins and no finals. Juan Martin Del Potro doesn’t really feature, since he only found his rhythm in the second half of the year (in Rome he actually had to qualify for the event). Robin Soderling and Marin Cilic also don’t bear mentioning, having only really matured in 2009.


Tell-all books in the sports world are not rare. Indeed hardly a month goes by without some sport somewhere being rocked by a scandal-ridden chronicle. The problem is that these accounts are almost always written by anonymous “insiders” or in-the-loop sports-writers – they are never written by the people who they are about. That’s why when Andre Agassi’s autobiography stirred up such furious controversy a few months ago it caught the attention not only of tennis fans, but of sports fans in general. A first-hand account of the tennis tour’s dirty secrets? Do tell, Mr. Agassi, do tell.

I must admit I was expecting Open to be so chock-full of shocking revelations that the book would catch fire if I turned the pages too quickly. I opened my copy to the first page, ready to be delighted from the get-go by a ca-reer’s worth of interesting anecdotes. Instead, the book opens with Agassi in a conflicted and vaguely self-pitying mood. In fact, if I had to sum up the whole book in one phrase it would be exactly that: “conflicted and vaguely self-pitying.” He starts off by talking briefly about his last ever professional tournament, the 2006 US Open – his routine, his mixed emotions about retiring and a wonderful account of the now-legendary epic against Marcos Baghdatis. After that he starts from the beginning, chronologically taking us on a journey from his childhood to the end of his career.

The one thing you’re likely to remember from this book is that Agassi hates tennis. “Surely not,” you might think, “nobody can be that good at something they hate.” But no, he hates tennis. He really, really hates it. Not since reading Eric Clapton’s biography have I been so surprised that someone so seemingly in love with what they were doing were so ut-terly miserable for most of their lives. He goes on about it a fair bit as well, and although it never gets openly irritating, his constant negativity does get a bit much sometimes.

As far as the scandals go, well, there really aren’t that many. The much-discussed drug confession isn’t nearly as bad as I thought it would be. Agassi wasn’t even competing

when he briefly dabbled in crystal meth, and subsequently failed an ATP drug test. Sure he lied to avoid a three month suspension, and that was obviously wrong, but the ATP is as much at fault as he is for ignoring the situation. Frankly I was much more shocked by John McEnroe’s revelations about the widespread cocaine use by players of his era in his autobiography.

Reports of Agassi’s intense hatred for his fellow players (especially Michael Chang, Boris Becker, Jim Courier and Pete Sampras) have also been vastly overstated. He was annoyed by Chang, largely indifferent to Courier and confused about his relationship with Sampras – at one point he even refers to them as being friends. The only person he really comes across as hating is Boris Becker, and he’s hardly the first player to make that confession.

So as a tell-all book, Open isn’t very success-ful. But then again, Agassi never really says that it’s a tell-all biography, so we shouldn’t judge it as one. As a straightforward sports autobiography, it’s one of the best ones I’ve read in quite a long time. Agassi never lets his personal stories overwhelm his tennis anecdotes – which many writers, especially Becker, are guilty of – and the reader gets an excellent insight into what it takes to make it as a professional tennis player. The book is also excellently written, and the contribu-tion of Pulitzer prize-winning journalist J. R. Moehringer – who assisted Agassi with the book –!is evident throughout.

Perhaps it would be fitting to compare Open to A Champion’s Mind, Pete Sampras’ autobiography. Like the ultimate outcome of their legendary rivalry, Sampras comes out on top when comparing the memoirs of the two players. Like Sampras himself, his book is much more tennis-focused than Agassi’s, and it provides a more complete portrait of top tennis player’s experience on the court. That being said, Open definitely wins as far as style is concerned, as it is a bit more colourful than Sampras’ account. After reading Open, I think even Andre Agassi himself would be happy with such a result.

Book: Open – An AutobiographyAuthor: Andre AgassiPublisher: HarperCollinsDate: 2009Score: 8.5/10

Last year saw very little change in the Masters rankings, with Nadal again occupying the top spot thanks to his spectacular wins at Indian Wells, Monte Carlo and Rome. It’s interesting to note that while 2009 was considered to be a mediocre year for the Spaniard, he still managed to better his awesome 2008 numbers. Djokovic again sneaks into second place, reaching four finals (Miami, Monte Carlo, Rome and Cincinnati) and winning in Paris. He too improved over his 2008 performance, scoring 775 points more than in that year. Murray again comes in third, with Federer staying put in fourth place. It’s perhaps understandable that Federer doesn’t approach the Masters 1000 events with the same enthusiasm as his peers, since he often seems to use them as preparation for Slams – testing out his game rather than trying to play his best. However, with Djokovic and Murray investing so heavily in the Masters tournaments, it’s disturbing to see them display the kind of attitude we saw in Indian Wells and Miami this year. They are losing a lot of points, and unless they can seriously get their acts together, they might take a serious dive in the rankings.

But let’s return to our initial question: what would the tour be like without Slams? Let’s look at the new rankings from Indian Wells in 2008 to Miami in 2010:

As in our smaller analyses, Nadal again comes out on top. His dominance is indisputable, gaining on average 80.25 points more than Djokovic, 141.57 more than Murray and a shock-ing 172.47 more than Federer. Roddick pays for his poor showing in 2008-2009 by coming in at fifth place. Davydenko’s consistency is impressive and he – along with Djokovic – are the only ones whose “Masters Ranking” echo their current ATP ranking. Del Potro and Tsonga have reasonable report cards, but nothing more than that. The Argentinean pays for his late arrival on the scene compared to his rivals, and Tsonga has steadily gone downhill since 2008. Soderling is improving, however, and has only recently started realising his true potential. Cilic disappoints, and is surprisingly unable to convert his recent Slam success into Masters 1000 success.

So if the ATP Tour were to change overnight, and all the old rankings thrown out, Nadal would be the king of the world. However, if the focus were to shift to Masters 1000 events, Federer would surely concentrate on them in the same way that he has been concentrating on Slams, and it might only be a matter of time before he climbed back to the top spot. So in the end it seems that the more things change, the more they would stay the same.

2009-2010 2008 2009 2010 Total AverageRanking

ATP

1 Nadal 3905 5280 720 9905 495,25 3

2 Djokovic 3705 4480 115 8300 415 2

3 Murray 2880 3635 205 6720 353,68 4

4 Federer 2595 3395 135 6125 322,36 1

5 Roddick 1105 1170 1600 3875 276,78 7

6 Davydenko 2125 1675 45 3845 226,17 6

7 Del Potro 317 1950 / 2267 188,91 5

8 Tsonga 1280 955 270 2505 156,56 10

9 Soderling 500 575 720 1795 94,47 8

10 Cilic 450 515 115 1080 54 9

By Philip Maré


Everyone knows Charles Lutwidge Dodg-son. You might think that you don’t, but you do. Ever heard of Alice in Wonder-

land? Well, the author of that book’s name was Lewis Carroll, who is actually a pseud-onym for Mr. Dodgson. So why are we talk-ing about Lewis Carroll in a tennis magazine? Well, it has something to do with tennis, natu-rally (we promise!).

You see, Dodgson was not only an esteemed scholar, educator and man of religion, but also a fine mathematician and inventor. He authored a variety of pamphlets covering a whole manner of different topics including cards, backgammon, charades and of course, tennis. In 1883 Dodgson published a study entitled Lawn Tennis Tournaments. Many scholars think that the writing of the booklet was prompted by Dodgson’s conversations with Oxford tennis players during tea parties in the gardens of Christ Church. Apparently

they complained about the fact that the prizes for the tournaments were awarded to lesser players who were favoured by lucky draws, whereas the stronger players had to fight each other early on in the tournament.

Dodgson began to examine the game and immediately made some interesting conclu-sions. In a 32-player draw, the second-best player only had a 16/31 chance to eventually claim the prize theoretically earmarked for him. This would only happen if he ended up in the opposite side of the draw to the winner. Carroll also calculated that the probability of the best four being awarded a prize were 12 to 1.

Carroll then began to analyse the matter, start-ing with a very simple hypothesis: if A beats B and C beats A, C will be stronger than both A and B. By following a logical mathematical system it is always possible – through a se-

By Konrad Grass

ries of relations built on the various results – to establish the superiority of one player over the others, of a second over the remaining ones and so on.

After a period of rigorous study he proposed a new way of playing tournaments. The draw would not be a direct knockout but an indirect elimination. Matches would create a relation between victories and defeats that would es-tablish the superiority of one player over an-other until someone emerges as indisputably superior to all others.

Assuming a 32-player draw, Carroll postulated a first round with a random draw, as was the practice at the time. It would therefore be A against B and C against D, E against F and so on until the thirty-first player (G) against the 32nd (H). After the first day no player would be eliminated, but there will be a second day in which the winners play one another, (A vs. C, and so on) and so do the losers (B vs. D etc.). At the end of the matches it would appear that C is the strongest of the four, having beaten both A in the second round and D in the first. A follows in turn, because he has beaten B but has lost against C. B is third, because he has beaten D but lost to A, who was beaten by C, and is therefore weaker than C. There remains

D, who has lost to all and is eliminated at the end of the round, together with the other 7 players who have lost their two matches. The third round is reserved for matches between winners.

Let us take the case of A. He could never aim to win the tournament because he has been beaten, but he can continue to play for a placement. There are 24 players left, and the unbeaten 8 play one another while the other 16 pair up. Two more rounds are played along the same logic as the first and the results continue to create relations of superiority and inferiority until there are only four players left. At the end of it all only one of them is unbeat-en. Dodgson does not call this the winner, but the “First prize man”. Of course now there is a three-way tie for second place, and these players will play their own mini-tournament to allocate second, third and fourth place.

All of this might seem a bit complicated, and to be quite honest it is. In today’s world, where tournaments are usually allocated only a week and the tennis schedule is extremely hectic, it’s hard to see this sort of system working. The person coming in at third place could play up to eight matches, which is to-tally unrealistic in the modern game. Televi-

sion networks would also have a tough time deciding which matches to broadcast, since there would be so many.

Nevertheless, it was Dodgson’s system that lead to the one we have today. In the 1927 Wimbledon tournament, the top eight players were seeded for the very first time, ensuring that they wouldn’t meet until later in the tour-nament, and that the two top seeds could only meet in the final. Today tournaments have as many as 32 seeds.

WRITER AND MATHEMATICIANCharles Lutwidge Dodgson was born in Daresbury, England, on 27 January 1832. He died in Gilford on 14 January 1898. The author of Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass was also an outstanding mathematician, poet and a photographer.


Sania Mirza

When Sania Mirza decided to play tennis as a little girl, she probably dreamed that one day she would be

known all over India for winning a Grand Slam. Part of that dream came true when she won the mixed doubles title at the Australian Open with her partner Mahesh Bhupathi in 2009, and she is definitely known all over India – and by now, neighbouring Pakistan – for many things, but rarely for her tennis victories. The latest contro-versy she has found herself at the centre of is her own marriage. For most people it is a time of joy and excitement, but for Mirza the weeks leading up to her marriage were filled with a firestorm of media controversy. The reason why a simple marriage should cause so much fuss, in this case, is because Mirza (India’s top tennis talent) was set to wed Shoaib Malik (the ex-

captain of the Pakistani cricket team).

Now the long-standing feud between the na-tions of Pakistan and India is nothing new. Since the partitioning of British India in 1947 that created both countries, relations between India and Pakistan have veered between ven-omous rhetoric and open war. Of course the marriage between two private individuals has nothing to do with the realm of politics, but in this region of the world things are never quite so simple.

As soon as the engagement became public, the normally docile Indian and Pakistani media outlets became a hotbed of tabloid journalism, and a series of ridiculous questions were end-lessly debated. Would Pakistan steal Mirza for

their Fed Cup team? (No, Mirza has said re-peatedly. She wants to play for India). Does the couple ever discuss the Mumbai attacks or the Taliban? Such and many other questions were so absurd they didn’t even warrant a response, and all the luckless couple could do was laugh them off.

When the wedding finally took place on April 11, both Mirza and Malik surely hoped that it would put an end to the matter. But if the his-tory of these two sportspeople is anything to go by, that is unlikely. Mirza has an uncanny knack for unintentionally offending just about every-one on the subcontinent. It’s a large place, and there’s always someone who will take offense at whatever you do, but the verve with which some people have attacked her actions has at times been nothing short of astounding.

In 2008 a huge furore erupted in her home country when an image of her relaxing with her feet up at the Hopman Cup was circulated. The problem was that an Indian flag appeared in the same photo, and many interpreted the proximi-ty of her feet to the flag as an insult to the coun-try. Some hard-liners even called for her to be charged and sent to prison. A couple of months before that she was forced to apologise to Muslim groups for unwittingly wandering onto

the Mecca Masjid in Hyderabad, and through-out her career she has been roundly criticised by conservative Muslims for the tennis clothes she wears on court (she is a practicing Muslim).

Malik has also enjoyed his fair share of con-troversy, and he was recently given a year-long ban by the Pakistani Cricket Board for a number of issues related to the poor performance of the team. Perhaps more importantly, just before the marriage allegations arose that Malik had mar-ried Ayesha Siddiqui (also Indian) years before, and was acting dishonourably by now trying to marry Mirza. Malik strongly denied the claim, maintaining that he had planned to marry the young woman but was prevented from do-ing so. There have been rumours that he will pursue legal action against his accuser and her

family. So intense did the speculation become that there was talk about revoking Malik’s passport until the matter could be conclusively investigated. He has also been linked to several other beauties, such as Miss India and various Bollywood actresses.

Yet despite all of this drama, the couple man-aged to tie the knot without (hopefully) suffer-ing any permanent harm from the various sagas that plagued their wedding preparations. Who knows, maybe the wedding of this Indian and Pakistani sporting couple will promote a little peace and understanding in their homelands. Like a dove emerging from a swarm of hawks, they might provide future generations with an example of how the two nations are actually not that different. One can only hope.


A Coach's Wisdom:

An Interview with

Where does your love for tennis come from?“I began to play when I was six years old, like many other children I suppose. My par-ents used to play and I used to join them at the club in Paris. Since then I never thought I could become anything but a professional ten-nis player. At a junior level I was among the best in France, but at 16 my parents decided that my education was more important, and I had to give up.”

A tough choice…“My father was very successful in the field of alternative energy, thanks also to his studies, and he only wanted the best for me. I can un-derstand that now, but the best for me was tennis. Having to put an end to my career as a player caused me great frustration, because as I said, I have always believed that tennis would be my life. So I worked for my father for 5 years and then explained to him that I did not wish to become his partner and that I preferred to follow my passion. He under-stood, and so I passed my exams as a coach and opened my academy”

Which philosophy did you follow?“When I began, 15 years ago, the model was that of Bollettieri: taking in the highest pos-sible number of players and putting them all under the same type of training, very tough, very physical. This way you destroy the ma-jority, but those that survive are really strong. My idea was the exact opposite. Choosing few players, but choosing them well, based on their potential. Understanding what they need and do whatever possible to help them. It is a costly method, but I have always been convinced that it is the best. My first group included Marcos Baghdatis, Gilles Muller, Paul-Henry Mathieu, Ivo Karlovic, Mario An-cic, Corinne Parmentier, Dudi Sela. All very

different from each other, but all with great potential.”

How do you select players? Based on tal-ent?“Not only, because there are many talented players between number 100 and number 1000 in the ranking. Talent is not what makes the difference. For me tennis is a way of ex-pressing what you have inside. Just as in mu-sic or theatre. Also in tennis you need a tech-nique to demonstrate what you are inside the court, your personality. I choose players based on their personality.”

In many parts of the world a duality has developed between private academies and tennis federations. Do you believe that tennis federations will eventually

disappear?“I don’t. Firstly because federations have the money. And becoming a top tennis player is a very costly endeavour. Federations have money and they have power. There can be co-operation, as was the case with Marcos Baghdatis for example. The Cypriot Federation did not have the infrastructure to help him, so they invested by sending him to my academy, where I also invested in him.”

Have you ever had any contact with the Italian Federation?“I have… but it was very complicated! The problem is that Federations are managed by politicians, who have political goals. They want to reap successes that make them look good. But as I said, Federations often have

a lot of money, and in the case of a young player with insufficient resources their contri-bution is critical.”

What does the daily work routine at the Mouratoglou academy consist of?“It is not easy to describe, because work is different for each athlete. The question we ask ourselves, in all areas of our activity, is: ‘what does this player need’? If you can answer this question, you have solved the problem, but to do so you need to spend a lot of time with the players. Observe them, un-derstand how they react emotionally, tennis-wise, physically. Ours is team work. We need to know what the physical weaknesses are, where we need to focus the training …”

Does each player have a personal trainer?“There is no need for that. Once you have un-derstood what a player needs, you can plan the type of daily work, in all areas, and often the coach is enough to follow the course. But every day we need to take a step forward. One thing I have to say is that in my academy everyone gets what they deserve. With us you can have the best, but you must deserve it. Earn it a step at the time. We don’t give presents to anyone, because nobody gives you anything in real life. In the past I have made some mistakes, I have given too much to someone who did not deserve it, and in do-ing so I really did not help him.”

You worked with Marcos Baghdatis for a long time, since was 13 until he turned 23. What did you learn from that experience?“I have realised that the only constraints we have are those we create in our own head. Let me tell you an anecdote. Marcos was still ranked number 250, and he was playing in a Challenger worth $100 000. He went through


INTERVIEW:

Chanel Simmonds

Q: When did you start playing tennis?Started playing at age 6.

Q: Why did you choose tennis?I played a lot of different sports, including netball, karate, gymnastics and athletics but loved tennis the most. I had to decide on one sport to do well.

Q: Does anyone else in your family play tennis?My mother played.

Q: Who was your first coach?Jean de Villiers. He was my coach for eight years but now I am coached by Earl Granger.

Q: When did you realize you wanted to become a professional tennis player?When I started winning tournaments I realised I wanted to be a professional. I was about 14 at that stage.

Q: What music do you listen to?Hip hop, rock, heavy metal.

Q: Do you listen to music before a match?Yes, to get myself pumped up.

Q: What is your routine before a match? Do you have any superstitions?I practice on court for an hour before my match. Then I get changed into my match clothes and relax and listen to music until I have to play. I don’t real ly

have superstitions, but there is one specific outfit which I tend to lose in so I don’t wear it in my matches.

Q: What is never missing from your tennis bag?My Roland Garros towel.

Q: Can you explain a typical day when you’re playing a tournament?Warm up early in the morning. Play my match, stretch, have a shower, eat and practice if necessary. Have an early night for the next day’s match. No schoolwork for that day.

Q: Do you have a boyfriend? How does your tennis affect your relationship?

No, I find I don’t have enough time to be in a relationship. It is unfair on the other person as I travel extensively and my days at home are so full.

Q: Do you ever play video games? What kinds do you like?I play games on my phone or my laptop. The Sims and a tennis game are my favourites.

Q: Do you like reading? If so, what kind of books do you prefer?

I don’t like thick story books. I prefer tennis books or magazines.

Q: Do you have a facebook page?Yes.

Q: Do you have your own fan site?Not yet.

Q: What do you feel during the most im-portant moments of each match?I work hard at keeping my emotions in tact on the court, and try to focus on the moment and winning the next point. Sometimes I do think of what will happen if I win or lose this specific match, but get my focus back to the present moment.

Q: How do you feel after losing important matches and how do you cope with that

feeling?I feel disappointed, but I look at what

happened in the match and try to learn from it for the next time.

Q: What has been your most memorable tennis moment?When I played in the

the qualifiers, passed the first round, the sec-ond, reached the quarter-final, the semi-final, then the final. For him it was already a good result. The Challenger was in Slovakia, and in the final he found himself opposite Dominik Hrbaty, then world number 14. It looked like a tough match, almost impossible. I was there. As the match starts, in a moment Hrbaty goes to 5-1. Dominik was playing better in all re-spects: technical, tactical, physical. I thought to myself: ‘Marcos has no chance, he is go-ing to lose’. Instead Marcos won that match. I don’t know how, don’t ask me, but he did it. And I am convinced that he won because he didn’t know that I had lost all hope inside of me. Had he known that, he would have lost.”

You opened your academy when you were very young, at 23. Today you are 39, but that is still young. What are your goals for the future?“My goal is still the same as when I started: winning the Slams, reaching number one. Each player is a goal. A challenge. I am pre-pared to give all my players what they need to improve and reach the top. It is the most exciting thing you can do in your life.”

Do you travel much around the tourna-ments? Do you follow any players in par-ticular?“I follow Yanina Wickmayer and Aravane Rezai full-time. In the academy I have people who know me and the mechanisms of the academy perfectly well, people I trust 100%. They know what I want and I am sure they can manage the work even better than me.”

How many players and how many staff

members do you have at the academy at the moment?“I follow 25 players and have a staff of 25. A good average, isn’t it?”

Let’s talk about money. How much does it cost to join your academy?“Too much! I said it earlier: being a tennis player is a very expensive business. But from my point of view the academy in itself is not a business, and never will be…”

Does your father help you financially?“He helped me a lot. Now I can rely on col-lateral activities that help me earn money, which I invest in the players rather than taking it for myself. Let me explain. If there is a ten-nis player who wants to work with me, and I with him, my goal is to take him to the top. To achieve this, it is important to improve his forehand, or his backhand, but also to provide him with the funds to train and travel. If his family is wealthy, they can pay, otherwise I can help him based on the results he achieves. I’ll say it again: the academy is not a business. If I had conceived it that way I would have got it all wrong. I ask nothing for myself. My goal is sports excellence, not financial success”.

Do you prefer to work with players al-ready established on the tour or with young players?“If I am on the tour from 1st January to 31st December it is because I like to work with the pros, such as Janina and Aravane. But it is just as interesting to build a player, and I can af-ford to do both.”

You also follow young Bulgarian Grigor

Dimitrov, who many are already calling the new Federer…“Indeed, but for the moment he is a long way away from Federer! He is ranked 280 in the world. I know that people think highly of him and he is very talented, but he still needs to work very hard.”

Would you like to work with some of the Italian players?“I have worked with Camilla Giorgi for three years. She has good potential. Very deter-mined, great build …”

But…?“There is always a ‘but’, all tennis players have one. But I don’t want to say anything negative, because our purpose is to solve problems, not to complain.”

At times perhaps the challenge lies in being able to manage the parents, rather than the players…“Indeed, it is not easy. But it’s part of the job.”

Would you accept a young Italian player should one approach you?“Not right now, because I am full. Seriously. I don’t want to drop the quality of my proposition.”

Who is the player that you most admire?“I have always liked Patrick Rafter. Not only for his style, but also for his enthusiasm, the character that he has brought to tennis. Pat loves tennis. On the court he has always given himself 100%, and he is a very open, charis-matic person. Technically speaking, he might not have been the best tennis player in the world, but he became world number one.”

Phot

o by

Reg

Cal

deco

tt

Photo by Reg Caldecott


Q: What could be changed to make ten-nis in SA bigger and better?We could do with more clay courts and even more tournaments.

Q: What do you think of SA’s chances in the Federation Cup this year?I am positive, it is my first time playing so I am really excited that we will do well.

Q: Who is the nicest person on the tennis circuit?Christi Potgieter, my doubles partner.

Q: Are there any players in particular you don’t get along with?I generally get on with everyone.

Q: What is your favourite pastime?My music is my favourite.

Q: Do you have any regrets about tennis or life in general?I would like to have more of a social life, but the tennis is my passion at the moment so I don’t have a problem sacrificing that part of my life.

Q: When was the last time you cried?Last week after I won the semi-finals of a tour-nament in Egypt when I was 3 – 5 down in the third set and won it 7 – 5 in the end. I had to play so hard.

Q: What do you think your greatest strength is as a person? And weakness?I have a strong mind and am very determined – I don’t like losing. My weakness is some-time I am too stubborn. That is what my coach says!

Q: Who is the best – Federer or Sampras? Clijsters or Henin or Serena Williams?Federer, Serena.

Q: Do you have any nicknames?Channel and they call me Stormie as my sec-

ond name is Storm.

Q: How would you describe, in one

word, players like Fe-derer, Nadal, Djokovic,

Henin, Sharapova and the Williams sisters?

Winners.

Q: Who is the most beautiful tennis player in the world?

Verdasco, I think he is gorgeous!

Q: Do you have a favourite internet site?Facebook.

Q: Which is your favourite tournament?French Open.

Q: Which is your dream about tennis?Winning the French open.

Q: Which city do you most like to visit?London, the shopping is amazing! I go there often with my dad.

Q: Who do you admire most in your life?My coach is a real inspiration for me. He has helped me a lot making the transition onto the professional scene.

Q: When was your first kiss?14

Q: Have you read Andre Agassi’s autobi-ography? What do you think about it?No, but I have heard about it.

Q: What are your tennis goals for 2010?Want to reach top 350 WTA by the end of the year and top 200 by 2011.

Q: How was your 2009?Best year ever. Reached 14 on ITF juniors in the world, got to the quarters of French Open, won my first WTA professional tournament.

Q: What string tension do you like to play with?61 pounds.

Q: Do you change your string tension when you changes surfaces? How dras-tically?Yes, only 2 pounds when I have to play on clay.

Q: What kind of strings do you use?Prince Tour.

Q: What grip size do you like?Three.

Q: What makes you angry during match-es?I am very even-tempered but I don’t like it when I double fault, it is a free point I don’t like giving away.

Q: What is your first feeling when you step on the court for a match?Excitement. Previously I would get nervous but now I look forward to compete.

Q: Do you keep a diary?No.

Q: Do you read Tennis World SA? What suggestions do you have?Yes, love getting the magazine. Nice to read about how well South Africans are doing as well as reading up on the great international players.

quarter-finals of the junior French Open last year.

Q: When was the worst patch of your ten-nis career?I have been lucky not to have a bad patch and have only improved. Hopefully I won’t have a bad patch anytime soon.

Q: Who is the best player you’ve ever faced?The number three seed of the current Soweto $100 000 tournament ranked 77 in the world, Klara Zakopalova.

Q: Who was the best player you’ve ever beaten? The number three seed of the current Soweto $100 000 tournament ranked 77 in the world, Klara Zakopalova.

Q: Which is your favourite surface and why?I prefer clay because I prefer the slower courts. My game involves spinney shots which kick on the clay. And sliding is fun!

Q: What is the strongest part of your game? What about the weakest?Forehand and serve are my strong points. I am

working on my volleys and drop shots that I think can still improve.

Q: How many hours do you spend on the court every day? And in the gym?On court training approximately six hrs a day and gym work an hour a day.

Q: Could you walk us through a typical day of training for you?Get up at 5.30 and leave home at 6.30 to be at the courts by 7AM. On-court training for three hours and then I usually have a one-on-one with my coach for an hour, sometimes two hrs. Then I go to the gym, have lunch, do some schoolwork and at 4PM back on court for an-other two hour group session. I play tennis six days a week.

Q: What is your least favourite part of training?I hate sweating, so I shower often during training.

Q: What is your favourite food?Pasta.

Q: Do you like tasting all kinds of different foods when you travel abroad for tennis?

No because I prefer to stick to my routine of

foods that I know.

Q: What is your favourite movie?Twilight.

Q: Who are your favourite actors/ac-tresses?Jim Carrey.

Q: What was the last electronic gadget you bought?iPod headphones.

Q: Do you have a computer?A laptop which I take with on tours.

Q: When you go on holiday, where is your ideal destination?Mauritius

Q: When was your last holiday?I travel a lot, but my last holiday that did not include tennis was a weekend away at a game farm earlier this year.

Q: Have you ever thought about what you will do when you stop playing tennis?Not thinking about that at the moment.

Q: What do you think about the state of tennis in South Africa?We are improving as we are hosting more tournaments.

Phot

o by

Reg

Cal

deco

tt

Phot

o by

Reg

Cal

deco

tt

Photo by Reg Caldecott


Kevin Curren’s place in the annals of South African tennis history is secure. A four-time Grand Slam doubles winner

and twice runner up in singles, Curren’s great-est disappointment is not that he fell short at the final hurdle in two Slam finals, but that he never had the opportunity to represent South Africa in the Davis Cup.

Of all his doubles triumphs at Slam level, it’s hard for the Durbanite to choose which victory meant the most to him. “It just depends on when you reflect back. The first one (US Open) is always special. Twenty-two thousand peo-ple at the biggest stadium at the time. It was a full house and it was fantastic. I think the good news at the time was that Steve Denton and I didn’t have to face John McEnroe in the final. McEnroe is in my view the best doubles player of all time and had it not been for him and his form I may have won many more Slams. Even so, the final against Victor Amaya and Hank Pfister was a really good match. It went to five sets and I was still really young at the time.”

Curren, who became a naturalised American in 1985, quit mixed doubles early in his career despite his feeling that he could have a lot of success in that form of the sport. In 1981 he won the US Open Mixed Doubles and re-peated the feat in 1982, along with a title at Wimbledon. He says he made this decision in order to concentrate on singles, and also because of endorsement considerations. “Sin-gles was always more important. The Grand Slams are where you separate the men from the boys. I cannot stress enough how different

they are from regular tournaments,” Curren remembers. “You know in golf every tourna-ment is played over four rounds so there is not much that differentiates the Majors. In tennis the Slams are over two weeks and for the men we play five sets instead of three so you could be out there concentrating for anything from two-and-a-half hours to five. The weather conditions can change a lot in a fortnight too. You can have dry, wet or overcast days as the tournament goes on or even on the same day sometimes. This is especially true of grass and clay.”

One of the most remarkable things about Cur-ren’s style of play was that, as a junior, he played with a double-handed grip. When he went to America he was forced to change it. Curren attributes his success with the double-handed grip to Durban’s slower and heavier hard courts, but points out that the change was necessary because of the much quicker American courts and balls. “All the guys served and volleyed over there and at the time they were switching to new racquets and I found that I just didn’t have enough time so it was a case of adapt or die.”

Curren taught himself how to use a forehand with heavy top spin. The likes of Rod Laver, Roy Emerson and John Newcombe all em-ployed the continental grip, but Current de-cided to emulate the western forehand which Bjorn Borg so effectively used.

Another reason he decided to change to the single-handed shot was the additional reach

it provided. “With the way the kids open their shoulder these days I think they get double power with the racquet speed. Quite frankly you’re doomed if you come with double hands these days.”

Kevin Curren is perhaps most famous for beat-ing John McEnroe, Jimmy Connors and Ste-fan Edberg en route to the final at the 1985 Wimbledon, where he lost to a 17-year old Boris Becker. The 6-3, 6-7, 7-6, 6-4 win made the German the youngest ever male to win a Grand Slam. McEnroe joked with Curren at the time about losing to an unknown teenager, but he says there was more to the teenager than McEnroe had realised. “What John forgot was that Becker had actually won Queen’s that year, and he wasn’t there to see this young kid.”

After his loss to Boris Becker, Curren predicted that there would be an increase in the number of successful young players, but he warned that their careers would probably be shorter. So what does he think about his prediction 25 years on? “Well the younger players have defi-nitely been on the mark. I mean just four years later Michael Chang broke Becker’s record for the youngest male Slam winner at Roland Garros. My comment has been especially true of the women’s game. Just look at Tracy Aus-tin, Monica Seles, Jennifer Capriati, Martina Hingis and so on winning at the ages of 15 or 16. The men’s game has also been so. Look at Rafael Nadal as a very good example. It will be harder to have longer careers. In my time if you were fairly good you could cruise through

the first two or three rounds. That is no longer the case.”

Modern training methods have also played a large role in changing the way athletes ap-proach the sport, says Curren. “It’s so different from techniques to the way the players now have teams of people who understand their individual bodies so much better. The mental side is also more sophisticated, with psycholo-gists playing an integral role.”

Once ranked as high as five in the singles world rankings, Curren rates Warren Jacques as the biggest influence during his career. “I dealt directly with Warren. I was also very friendly with Fred Stolle, Cliff Drysdale and Ray Moore, but Warren was the main guy.” He also employed a psychologist, but only later in his career. He laments not having spent more time with a mental coach. “The percep-tion was that if you go to a psychologist then something was wrong. It was only after a chat with Nick Faldo (former world number one golfer) that I did, but by then my career was in its twilight and it was too late for me.”

Through most of the 1990’s South Africa boast-ed top ten singles players like Wayne Ferreira and Amanda Coetzer, but today the country has no one ranked in the Top 100. Curren believes that the country needs more enthu-siastic sponsors and better tennis academies, and points to Spain as an example of a country where there are tournaments held every week. “We don’t have a coordinated system and so our coaches, players and other role players are not on the same page. I think the worst thing was letting the Super Squad system go. That was great for identifying talent. Wayne Fer-reira, Ellis Ferreira and Grant Stafford all came

out of that system. Since we have no system we are struggling to produce players. So kids either have to have exceptional talent, great coaching or all the luck in the world. As a re-sult our kids are undercooked and the rest of the world is certainly ahead.”

Curren is impressed with South African Ten-nis Association CEO Ian Smith, who he says is working very hard to get South African ten-nis back on track. “Tennis shouldn’t be in the state it is in (in this country). We’ve got great weather and plenty of tennis courts. Smith has reintroduced tournaments and Challengers so that’s at least a step in the right direction.”

Former Sports and Recreation Minister Ng-conde Balfour proved to be a stumbling block in a meeting to discuss the future of tennis in the country. Curren insisted that like every-thing else, tennis requires investment, and was disappointed that Balfour saw tennis as an elitist sport.

In a career that lasted 14 years, Curren man-aged to earn more than $3 million. He puts this down to consistency. “For a long time I never lost to somebody below me in the rankings and at one time I was in the top ten of all-time on the money list. Of course that has now changed because of inflation, and don’t forget that when I reached the Wimbledon final I earned $75 000 dollars. I think the first round losers get close to that today,” he laughs. “It also helped that I reached the semi-finals in doubles and quarter-finals in singles on a regu-lar basis.”

For anyone considering a career in tennis, Cur-ren believes that a ranking inside the top two hundred is needed for a comfortable lifestyle.

“Don’t forget that we see what the guys earn in prize money and yes, there are endorsement deals too but you have to subtract things like tax and travel expenses. It’s definitely not nice being number three hundred because then you’re maybe making only $20 000 a year. Then you have to stress about qualifying for the main draw of tournaments and that’s re-ally hard.”

There is no disputing that Curren was one of South Africa’s most successful tennis players, but who does he rate as the best to emerge from these shores? “It’s difficult to compare eras, but if you analyse and I had to go on the conversations I’ve had with the older guys as well then I’d say Eric Sturgess. He had an amazing record. He didn’t win any majors but all the older guys rate him very highly. Drys-dale, Ferreira and myself would make that list and of course Johan Kriek.” Curren believes that Ferreira and Kriek were very gifted, and especially admires the latter’s talent. “He had a phenomenal record. Two Aussie Opens, a US semi, a French semi…but funnily enough struggled at Wimbledon.” Curren thinks Kriek didn’t feel comfortable with the soft, low bounce at the All England Club.

Another striking similarity between Kriek and Ferreira, he says, was their mental capacity. “I think if Kriek had Drysdale’s mental toughness he may have won many more majors. I believe the same for myself.”

Kevin Curren reached a career-high doubles ranking of number three and won his last dou-bles title in Seoul in 1992. He retired from the professional tour in 1993 and currently resides in Durban, but still travels to Wimbledon every single year.

Kevin Curren


Greer Leo-Smith

Hope for the Future John-Laffnie De Jager

A Stern Challenge

The Euro/Africa Group II Fed Cup tie in Ar-menia presents us with an even greater challenge than last year in Turkey. The

girls thoroughly enjoyed themselves last time but it will be difficult for us as we are without Chani Scheepers and Natalie Grandin. Nata-lie was our star last year but she is maid of honour for Nicole Rencken on May 2nd, so it is perfectly understandable. I must stress that her absence will be a massive blow to our strength.

Even so I am looking forward to this clash. Our aim is to go over there and perform well, while hopefully causing a few upsets along the way. We are focusing on a five-year plan and that is why the makeup of the squad is so young. Three of our members are from the Under 18 group, while Natasha Fourouclas is from the Under 16 group. The other girls are Chanel Simmonds, Kelly Anderson and Christi Pot-gieter, who impressed at last year’s Soweto Open.

We could have gone with players who have more experience – particularly those living overseas – but I think we need to improve ten-nis by exposing our juniors to the intensity of competition at the highest level. I am excited to see how the girls blossom. Chanel should be slightly more used to the overseas travel, while I think Natasha has had just one over-seas trip before.

Of course we are taking a risk because we may not maintain our position this year, but the board and selectors share my optimism for the future. We have some exciting prospects at Under 14 and Under 16 level, and if these players can be nurtured I think our Fed Cup

girls could be flying high in the next few years. The future is definitely bright.We are going to have tough competition in Armenia. We must not be under any illusions. Considering our inexperience I know expecta-tions are unlikely to be high. That said, last year we were the envy of the other nations thanks to our tremendous team spirit. There is no doubt that this enthusiasm pulled us through in Turkey. All the girls had fun and I am hoping we can emulate that same unity and atmosphere this year as we look to sur-prise a lot of people.

Another challenge for us has been acquiring information about the Orange Fitness & Ten-

nis Club (OFTC) in Armenia. It is here where we are going to come up against the hosts as well as Finland, Georgia, Greece, Liechten-stein, Luxembourg and Norway. On the red clay courts at the OFTC I am particularly wary of the Georgians. I see them as the favourites.

We are going there to be competitive and to learn as we aim to give our girls more interna-tional experience and exposure. Next month I shall report back on how things unfolded. Hold thumbs for us please – it is always comforting knowing that the nation is one hundred per cent behind you, especially when you are far away from home. We are going to do our best to make South Africa proud.

Finland is going to be an extremely tough Davis Cup Euro/Africa Zone Group I tie for us. However I feel we have got the tools to

get the job done on the hard courts at Groenk-loof from the 7th to 9th of May. After consult-ing with the players following last year’s disap-pointing loss to India at the Ellis Park Indoor Arena, we opted for an outdoor court again. This will allow our guys to take full advantage of the high altitude that has assisted us so many times at home in the past.

It stands to reason that every Davis Cup cap-tain would want his top-ranked players avail-able. Just think how much weaker Switzerland is if Roger Federer is unavailable. I could po-tentially pick a squad consisting of Kevin An-derson, Rik De Voest, Izak Van Der Merwe, Jeff Coetzee and Wesley Moodie. My eye cannot ignore Raven Klaasen, who has also performed well for us recently. Fritz Wolmarans is also starting to play well again. Given his massive serve he will always be hard to ignore at high altitude.This is great from my point of view as it forc-es me to have to leave guys out rather than scramble to put a team together. Wesley is our biggest concern after injuring himself at the start of the year in Australia but he tells me he is feeling well again. Rik is also providing me with a dilemma. Since the start of the year his singles ranking has dropped below Izak’s, but his doubles ranking has improved so much he is now ahead of Jeff!

Speaking of which, Jeff and Wesley will be the preferred doubles combination. I always opt for combinations and records against specific opponents, especially when you consider how many average ATP Tour players become great Davis Cup players.The Finns will be tough. Jarkko Nieminen is their best-known player and I do not have to elaborate on what he can do. Nieminen is play-ing well since coming back from injury but he is no longer the solo performer in a one-man team. These days they have got a young kid named Henri Kontinen, who in my view actually won the tie for them against Poland. However, he has never played at high altitude so that will test him. Nieminen has the game to be successful at high altitude, but we saw at the SA Tennis Open that he clearly does not like it and hopefully that will play into our hands.

The neutral observer may feel that Finland have the upper hand in singles, but I think it will be very even and come down to our doubles rub-ber, where I feel we have the advantage. Let us hope that next month I am talking about a World Group Play-off match. Wish us well.


Documents

Tennis World International n° 6