Terje Sverud, Head of Section Environment Advisory · CATCH fordelt på tiltakstyper for skip med operasjon i norske farvann (2015‐2040) Baseline: 11,5 millioner tonn CO2 per år

DNV GL © 2013 JAPAN-NORWAY MARITIME WORKING MEETING 3 JUNE 2015 SAFER, SMARTER, GREENERDNV GL © 2013

JAPAN-NORWAY MARITIME WORKING MEETING 3 JUNE 2015Terje Sverud, Head of Section Environment Advisory

Emission reducing fuels - the way forward

DNV GL © 2013 JAPAN-NORWAY MARITIME WORKING MEETING 3 JUNE 2015

The industry is now at the start of two major “revolutions”

For the first time in 100 years, the shipping industry is now considering alternative fuels

In the span of 5 years, shipping has gone from being one of the least transparent industries to being one of the best monitored

2


LNG fuelled ship projects – where are we heading?

3

Updated 07.05.2015Excluding LNG carriers and inland waterway vessels

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Nu

mb

er o

f sh

ips

Year of delivery

Development of LNG fuelled fleet

Ships in operation Ships on order


Maritime battery systems – where are we heading?

4

Eidesvik: Viking Lady, hybrid supply vessel, retrofit in Norway 2013

Østensjø: Edda Ferd, hybrid supply vessel, built by Astilleros in Spain 2013

Østensjø: large hybrid offshore construction vessel, built by Kleven in Norway 2016

Fafnir Offshore: hybrid supply vessel, built by Havyard Ship Technology, Norway

Selfa Arctic: hybrid fishing boat, built in Norway 2014

SVITZER: 4 battery hybrid tugboats, built by ASL Marine, Singapore

KOTUG: RT Adriaan, hybrid tugboat in Rotterdam, retrofit 2012

Foss: Carolyn Dorothy hybrid tug of LA, built by Foss' Rainier Shipyard, USA 2009

Scandlines: 4 battery hybrid ferries, retrofit 2013

Foss: Campbell Foss hybrid tug of LA, retrofit by Foss' Rainier Shipyard, USA 2012

NORLED: Finnøy, hybrid ferry, retrofit, Norway 2013

NORLED: Folgefonn, hybrid/pure battery ferry in Norway 2014

Fjord1: Fannefjord LNG, hybrid hybrid ferry, retrofit

Scottish Government: Hybrid ferry in Scotland, built by Ferguson in Glasgow

University of Victoria: Tsekola II, hybrid research vessel, retrofit in Canada

NORLED: 100 % battery ferry, new build Fjellstrand in Norway 2015


The way forward – in Norway

Environmentally friendly fuels, measures, and means towards 2040: Detailed analysis of the characteristics of maritime traffic, fuel

usage, and emissions from shipping in Norwegian waters Analysis of the emission reduction potentials and cost-benefit of

alternative fuels towards 2040, covering:- Biofuels- Electricity- LNG

5

The Norwegian Government aims to contribute to a transition towards use of green fuels in the maritime sector


We need to know where are before we decide where to go

6

AIS data for 2013:• Every 6th min• 6700 different vessels• Millions of records


Where are we today – traffic and emissions in Norwegian waters

7

AIS data for 2013 16 %

55 %

22 %

Separation of traffic types:

Transit traffic

Foreign traffic

Domestic traffic

Emissions from domestic traffic 2013:

CO2 4.1 mill. ton 9 % of Norw. emissions

NOx 52 000 ton 34 % of Norw. emissions

SOx 4 500 ton 25 % of Norw. emissions

PM 2 300 ton


0

100000

200000

300000

400000

500000

600000

Fuel consumption (ton) in Norwegian waters ‐ 2013

Transit Domestic In port Foreign

Where are we today – Fuel consumption in Norwegian waters


The way forward – Emission reduction potentials

9

Without measures, CO2emissions could grow by 60% from 2015 to 2040

The challenge is to cut emissions to 40% below

current level

Calculations show that this can be realised by introducing green fuels on 2700 ships (1/3 of the fleet) by 2040:

- Cargo ships and fishing vessels use sustainable biofuels

- Passenger vessels use electric propulsion

- Offshore vessels use LNG

20402015

CO2

Emissions of NOx, SOx, and PM can also be cut through use of green fuels


The figure illustrate findings that are valid across fuel-price scenarios:• LNG and biofuels is cost effective in a business perspective for many ship segments• Electric power comes at a cost, but the cost is not high• The major contributions to CO2 reduction comes from electric power and biofuel

‐200

‐100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

0 700 000 1 300 000 2 000 000 2 600 000 3 300 000 4 000 000CATCH

per to

nn CO2 redu

sert [N

OK/tonn

CO2]

CO2‐redusert [tonn per år]

CATCH fordelt på tiltakstyper for skip med operasjon i norske farvann (2015‐2040)Baseline: 11,5 millioner tonn CO2 per årReduksjon: 4,2 millioner tonn CO2 per år

LNG

Biogass

Biodiesel

Vegetabilsk olje

Hybrid elektrisk

Fullelektrisk

Landstrøm

Vegetable oil

Electric power

LNG

CO2 reduction (ton per year)

Cos

t ef

fect

iven

ess

(NO

K/t

on C

O2)

Cost effectiveness of alternative fuels

The way forward – Cost effectiveness of CO2 reduction measures


Summing up

11

• AIS-data and better analytical methods have given new insight in fuel consumption and emissions – including the ability to separate domestic, foreign and transit traffic

• Using green fuel to reduce 2040 CO2 emissions to levels below those of 2015 requires the use of zero-emission options such as biofuels and electricity

• Several measures will give cost-effective CO2 reductions. The cost effectiveness will vary with fuel price for all measures

• Norway has formed a basis for further work with policy instruments to encourage the transition towards green fuels


SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER

www.dnvgl.com

Emission reducing fuels – the way forward

12

Contact:[email protected]

Documents

Terje Sverud, Head of Section Environment Advisory · CATCH fordelt på tiltakstyper for skip med operasjon i norske farvann (2015‐2040) Baseline: 11,5 millioner tonn CO2 per år