B. Frank l\1cCu!!ou;h

TERMINAL BUILDING ANALYSIS ROBERT MUELLER MUNICIPAL AIRPORT

AUSTIN TEXAS

. OFFICE OF FEHR AND GRANGER flllfllllll OJ THI AflliiiCAN INITITUTI OJ AICHIIICTI

A I C H I T I C T I A N D PL A N N I N 0 C 0 N I U L T A N T I

401 IAIT PIPTII.NTH ITIIIT A U I T I N, T I X A I

TERMINAL BUILDING ANALYSIS

ROBERT MUELLER MUNICIPAL AIRPORT

A US TIN,

CITY COUNCIL Tom Miller, Mayor Wesley Pearson, Mayor Pro-Tem Mrs. Emma Long Ben White Lester Palmer

CITY MANAGER W. T. Williams, Jr.

TEXAS

DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS S. Reuben Rountree, Jr.

ARCHITECTS Office of Fehr & Granger

GENERAL ANALYSIS

Terminal· Building, Austin Airport

The evolution of a program for the various facilities needed at

an airport consists of a complex series of calculation. The basic

problem is one of circulation, human and vehicular, and hence one

of coordination of the various points of the project.

As in any planning study in which a projection and prediction of

future needs is required, this program for the Terminal Building,

and supporting facilities for Robert Mueller Municipal Airport is

based on forecast of ten and twenty years requirements for pas-

sengers, airlines and related facility requirements. Forecasts

have been compiled from a study of population trends in Austin and

Texas, indications of future economic, governmental educational

and industrial growth and the past record of air traffic and its rela-

tion to the national average. These indicate an upward trend in air

traffic through 1980, based on the following:

1. A continuing increase in population.*

2. An increase in income exceeding the rate of population

growth.

3. Continuing improvements in the technological and service

characteristics of aircraft which will tend to increase the

airlines share of inter-city travel.**

-1-* Charts P-1 and P-2

** In 1957 for the first time airlines operated more passenger miles than either railroads or inter-city buses.

To establish the space requirements for the various functions

within the terminal building the annual passenger traffic forecast

has been reduced to peak hour traffic loads since the building must

be able to accommodate a normal peak period's traffic.

Close cooperation of city departments, commercial airlines,

civil aeronautics administration, weather bureau and others have

made possible sound economical planning for the terminal building"

Facilities and structures to be built immediately cannot be designed

for ultimate growth for obvious economic reasons. For this reason,

first stage program which will provide the necessary facilities for

approximately ten years is planned.

A second stage expansion program to provide additional facili­

ties required, is projected in the master plan. This will provide

a terminal building and supporting areas sufficient to care for the

passenger traffic possible with the present runway system. It is

felt that a projection beyond this point is not practical due to the

unknown factor of technological developments in aircraft beyond

1980.

-2-

PLANNING ANALYSIS

According to the Civil Aeronautic Administration a new Ter­

minal Building should be built sufficiently large in the first stage

of construction to accommodate the activities anticipated at the

end of a ten year period. Space thus provided may not be fully

utilized at the outset, but this condition is compensated for by the

advantages gained through accommodating traffic increases with no

interruption in service, and obviating frequent and costly additions

to the building. The original construction should be considered as

a "stage" of the final development, rather than the final develop­

ment. The Terminal Building should be conceived in its final form,

so that when expansion is necessary, there will be a minimum of

structural changes required as succeeding stages in the construction

take place. This type of development, in keeping with long range

planning, is advisable not only from an economic standpoint, but

also from the standpoint of making provisions for possible future

changes in operating requirements.

A CAA study of activities at a representative group of air-

ports revealed the existence of relationships between the number

of annual passengers and the number of passengers accommodated

during the typically busy or peak hours. This study also revealed

that relatiohships existed between the number of peak hour passen­

gers and the number of visitors, concession customers, and occupants

-3-

of public areas. For airports of like passenger volume, the peak

relationship fell within a sufficiently narrow range to permit use of

them for planning purposes.

According to the Airline Records* at the Austin Terminal the

peak period occurs in the Fall, Spring and Winter months between

the hours of 7:40 to 8:40a.m., 8:17 to 9:17a.m., 4:00 to 5:00p.m. ,

and 6:45 to 7:45 p.m. In 1956, the average peak number of total

passengers for this period was from 64 to 70 passengers enplaning

and deplaning. Thus, this would be considered the number of typical

peak hour passengers, This is approximately the same as the national

average of peak-hour passengers for airports handling the same volume

of annual revenue passengers which for Austin in 1956 was 139,668.

The forecast** of the annual passenger volume shows that in 1970

Austin will handle 403,560 enplaning and deplaning passengers, with

a peak hour rate of 162 passengers as shown on Charts no. C-1 and

C-2.

According to the CAA the Austin airport's potential traffic charac-

teristics will probably continue at the same rate as the national fore-

cast for U.S. total annual airline passengers. Then the projection of

the peak hour passenger rate will be 162 passengers in 1970 and 230

passengers in 1980, which would cover both the 10 year planning period

and the 20 year long range planning period.

*See Chart A-1 ** CAA Forecast

-4-

LOADING GATES AND APRON ANALYSIS

For planning purposes it should be assumed that a plane normally

requires an average of 30 minutes on the loading apron.* Austin Air-

port handles at the present time 33 scheduled commercial airline air-

craft per day and has a peak-hour load of 7 aircraft. According to

the A. T. A. an airport which handles 7 aircraft operations per hour;

i.e. , 7 landings and 7 take-offs or a total of 14 plane movements per

hour, would require at least 3 gate positions; however, due to close

scheduling at the Austin Airport, there are often more than 3 planes

on the loading apron at one time. It would, therefore, seem feasible

to plan the loading apron capacity for at least 4 planes and possibly up

to 6 planes. We recommended that the Airport Administration

make a study of the gate requirements and recommend how many

will be required. This has been set at 6 gate positions to take care

of the immediate future.

By 1970 at the projected rate of growth there will be approxi-

mately two and one half times the peak-hour passenger load, which

means that the number of loading gates should be planned at the

present time to be increased at least two times the present needed

capacity, or 8 to 9 aircraft. The rate of increased gate capacity is

less than the projected rate of passenger growth since the trend is

toward larger aircraft rather thanan increase in the number of

scheduled flights.

-5-

*Air Transport Association of America Airline Airport Design Recommendations Part #1

By 1980 at the projected rate of growth there will be approxi­

mately three and one half times the peak-hour passenger load which

means that the number of loading gates to be planned for in the long­

range plan should be increased at least three times the present

needed capacity, or 12 aircraft. This could be decreased if the future

carrying capacity of aircraft is considerably increased, which is the

general tendency.

The 10 year and long-range capacity may be developed by the

capacity indicated in such stages as required; and, in order to

attain the estimated final stage, it is nece:o;sary only to locate the

initial construction in proper relation to the runway pattern and

preserve the areas of width and length required for the ultimate

development. If subsequent developments become stabilized and

the areas so preserved are not required, they may then be avail­

able for other useful purposes.

The shape of the Loading Apron is optional and careful study*

has been given to the present needs and the ultimate capacity so

that the apron does not develop into a bottleneck. At th8 present

time the Finger Loading system will be the most efficient and econom­

ical type loading system. This consists of piers stretching into the

field perpendicular or radial to the building, with planes grouped along

these extensions. By use of this system, the walking time and distance

for passengers from the waiting room to the aircraft can be reduced

-6-

* Charts C-10, C-ll and C-12

considerably along with the loading and rolling distances for baggage,

mail, etc. This will be important with the future increase in peak­

hour load of aircraft.

The number of required aircraft loading positions, in any system,

can be held to a minimum through effective moniioriirg and control

of their use. To carry on the operation of these positions with a maxi­

mum or near maximum utilization of the results in three important

effects:

(1) Savings in original and costly construction of excess aircraft

loading positions.

(2) Reduction in the length of passenger way or finger necessary

to reach the outermost positions.

(3) Reduction of the time and distance required for passengers

or apron service vehicles to reach the remote positions from the

terminal building.

The A. T.A. recommends that the Loading Apron should have

the aircraft loading position from 150 to 175 feet average spacing. The

actual spacing being dependent on the types of aircraft which will op­

erate on the field. Distances and sizes of aprons should be similar to

those shown on drawing No. A-2.

-7-

OUTLINE OF SPACE REQUIREMENTS

Space Present Area

Public Spaces

Waiting Lounge

Ticket Lobby and Corridor

Baggage Claims

Public Restrooms and Nursery

Concourse, corridors, Lobby, closets, entrance foyer, miscl. areas

Airline Facilities Passenger service counters and operations

Braniff

Continental

Trans-Texas

Future

835

420

590

330

360

Total

-8-

*Source: CAA Charts C-3 thru C-7

STAGE 1 Recommended* Areas to take care of growth to 1970

Men Ladies Nursery

3,350

2,400

1,267

720 640 170

6,700

1,890

1,755

1,080

675

5,400

Present Area

Weather Bureau

Offices and Radar Storage

2,240*

Generator in basement

CAA Facilities Office

Control Tower Cab Control Tower Cab Storage Tower Chief Office in Tower Recorder Room in Tower A TCS Operations Room ATCS Operations Room Storage ATCS Chief ATCS and Tower Equip. Room Service Area Maintenance Storage SEMT Office Telco Room Engine -Generator Room in Basement

Junction Room in Tower Stairs, Misc. in Tower Tower Wiring Shaft Wiring Shaft Terminal Room Tower Toilet

Airport Administration Office and Storage

Restaurant Dining and Snack Bar Kitchen, Storage and

Miscellaneous

786

508

-9-

STAGE 1 Recommended Areas to take care of growth to 1970

1,300 200

50 1,550

324 200 160 100 450 100 180 624 160 150 160 100 200

2,908 320

1,000 120 176

30

365

2,664

1,200

Concessions Present Area

Vending machines, news novelties, gifts, display.

Telephones and lockers

Travel Insurance Sales

Car Rental Systems

Miscellaneous

2 offices-fixed Base Operators Rental offices and future expansion

Mechanical and air conditioning (Basement, Main Floor and Tower)

Basement Storage

Wall allowance TOTAL Stage 1

First Stage - Basic Sg. Footage

Main Floor

Tower

Basement Total Sq. Footage

-10-

STAGE 1 Recommended Areas to take care of growth to 1970

280

120

80

120

240 1,175

2,360

250

2 140 37,745

33,053

2., 268

2,424 37,745

COST ANALYSIS

Stage 1

Building Loading Finger Vehicle covered loading

Contingency Fees

Loading apron for 6 planes 11, 600 sq. yds. 8" concrete 42,000 sq. yds. asphalt

300 car min. parking, drive 31,000 s. y.

Curbs 12,000 l. Ft.

Lighting parking area

-11-

652,000.00 40,000.00 12,000.00

704,000.00

35,000.00 45 000.00

784,000.00

260,800.00

24,800.00

7,200.00

20,000.00

$1,096,800.00

TOTAL PASSENGERS PER YEAR 1947- 1957

1. Passengers originating (departing) flights in Austin.

Year 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957

Comm. Airlines 37,482 33,445 37,252 38,247 43,975 45,545 49,630 53,553 62,228 69,996 74,590

*Civilian Transit 30,177 27,196 21,899 36,088 36,474 30,248 26,562 33,093 36,926 44,417

Total Airline and Civilian 67,659 60,641 59,151 74,335 80,449 75,793 76,192 86,646 99,154

114,413

**U.S. Military 1900 1500 3000 3500 4500 4500 5000 6000 4500 6000

*Estimated from Radio Contact Records

**Estimated. Some U.S. Military Flight Information on classified.

2. Passengers terminating (arriving) flights in Austin.

Comm. *Civilian Total Airline Year Airlines Transit and Civilian **U.S. Military 1947 35,625 30,173 65' 798 1850 1948 33,495 27,192 60,687 1500 1949 36,391 21,899 58,290 3000 1950 36,279 36,094 72,373 3800 1951 42,214 36,472 78,686 4500 1952 45,320 30,235 75,555 4500 1953 47,887 26,353 74,240 5000 1954 52,864 33,093 85,957 6500 1955 61, 716 36,928 98,644 5000 1956 69,672 44,433 114, 105 6000 1957 72,808

*Estimated from Radio **Estimated. Some Contact Records U.S. Military Flight

Information on classified

-12-

1956 MONTHLY AIRLINE TOTAL PASSENGERS OFF AND ON

Braniff Trans-Texas Continental off on off on off on Totals

Jan. 3189 3205 374 296 1750 1725 10,539

Feb. 3226 3114 444 310 1574 1604 10,272

Mar. 3599 3895 625 450 2023 2034 12,626

Apr. 3418 3678 574 403 2104 1957 12,134

May 3628 4059 573 481 1947 1951 12,639

June 3255 3496 646 470 1900 1904 11,671

July 2846 3032 605 502 1649 1639 10,273

Aug. 3133 3370 648 500 1754 1656 11,061

Sept. 3250 3229 855 541 2046 1920 11,841

Oct. 3299 3699 858 675 2057 1989 12,567

Nov. 3300 3681 736 611 2038 2117 12r483

Dec. 3155 3343 730 534 1864 1936 11,562

Totals 39,298 41,801 7,668 5,773 22,706 22,432 139,668

%of total all 56.5% 59.8% 11% 8.2% 32.5% 32% airlines

*Source: Airline Records

-13-

PASSENGERS ARRIVING AND DEPARTING AIRPORT

Commercial Airlines Military* Civilian* Total Total Month Arrive Depart Total Arrive Depart Arrive Depart Arrive Depart

Jan.1957 5, 726 5,794 11,520 3,176 3,174 5,941 5,939 14,843 14,907

Feb.1957 5,612 5,644 11,256 3,648 3,648 8,467 8,463 17,727 17,755

Mar.1957 6,801 6,993 13,794 3,424 3,424 8, 149 8,147 18,374 18,564

Apr. 1957 6,612 6,654 13,266 3,212 3,212 7,790 7, 790 17,614 17,656

' May 1957 6,260 6,655 12,915 3,632 3,632 10, 142 . 10,142. 20,034 20,429

June 1957 5,907 6,200 12,107 3,624 3,266 10,691 10,691 20,222 20,513

July 1957 5, 511 5,581 11,092 5,096 5,096 11,498 11,498. 22,105 22,175

Aug.1957 5,653 5,852 11,505 5,636 5,636 11,691 . 11,689 22,980 23,177 I

"" ,--1

I

Sept. 1957 6,130 5,907 12,037 5,398 5,396 10,389 10,392 21,917 21,695

Oct. 1957 7,243 7,310 14,553 4,880 4,882 10,979 10,977 23,102 23,169

Nov. 1957 5,445 5,758 11,203 1,926 1,924 9, 715 9, 715 17,086 17,397

Dec. 1957 5,908 6,242 12,150 2,644 2,644 10,104 10,103 18,656 18,989

Totals 72,808 74,590 147,398 46,296 45,934 115, 556 115,546 234,660 236,426

* Estimated number of passengers from tower reports.

LIST OF AIRLINE SCHEDULES AS OF

APRIL 1, 1958

Flight No. De12art. Time TJ::J2e Aircraft Braniff

28 7:00AM Convair 525 8:19AM DC 6

23 8:37AM DC 3 228 9:13AM DC 3 no operate Sun.

34 10:49 AM Convair 15 11:04 AM Convair 42 1:39PM Convair 48 3:36PM . DC 3 39 4:04PM Convair 54 5:39PM Convair

382 6:59PM Convair no operate Sat .. 53 7:14PM Convair 57 7:49PM Convair

261 10:22 PM DC 3 no operate Sat. 564 10:44 PM Convair

3 1:24PM Convair

Continental 110 7:55AM DC 3 no operate Sun. 311 8:33AM Convair 113 12:09 PM DC 3 312 1:44PM Convair 315 4:28PM Convair 114 4:56PM DC 3 117 7:40PM DC 3 no operate Sat. 316 8:34PM Convair

Trans-Texas 91 8:30AM DC 3 no operate Sun. 70 9:17AM DC 3 no operate Sun. 90 9:36AM DC 3 no operate Sun. 94 2:34PM DC 3 97 3:00PM DC 3 93 7:20PM DC 3 no operate Sat. 72 7:25PM DC 3 no operate Sat. 73 7:26PM DC 3 no operate Sat.

or Sun. 92 7:34PM DC 3 71 10:54 PM DC 3 no operate Sat.

-15-

1956* AVERAGE TOTAL PASSENGERS FOR

AIRLINE FLIGHTS

Flight Airline Plane Arrival Dept. Min. on Average total No. Co. Type Time Time ram12 12ass. on and off

28 B Conv. 6:49am 7:00am 11 22 110 c DC 3 7:49 7:55 6 13 525 B Conv. 8:09 8:19 10 12

a311 c Conv. 8:25 8:33 8 22 91 TT DC 3 8:26 8:30 4 7 Peak hour 23 B DC 3 8:27 8:37 10 14 of operation

a228 B DC 3 9:03 9:13 10 11 70 total pass. a 70 TT DC 3 9:14 9:17 3 4 a 90 TT DC 3 9:31 9:36 5 4

34 B Conv. 10:39 10:49 10 21 15 B Conv. 10:54 11:04 10 17

113 c DC 3 12:04 pm 12:09 pm 5 11 42 B Conv. 1:29 1:39 10 18

312 c Conv. 1:36 1:44 8 23 94 TT DC 3 2:32 2:34 2 5 97 TT DC 3 2:56 3:00 4 7 48 B DC 3 3:26 3:36 10 12 39 B Conv. 3:54 4:04 10 25

315 c Conv. 4:20 4:28 8 24 114 c DC 3 4:51 4:56 5 15

54 B Conv. 5:29 5:39 10 21 a382 B Conv. 6:49 6:59 10 13

53 B Conv. 7:04 7:14 10 25 b 93 TT DC 3 7: 1fl 7:20 4 5 b 72 TT DC 3 7:22 7:25 3 4 ab73 TT DC 3 7:23 7:26 3 5

92 TT DC 3 7:30 7:34 4 3 b117 c DC 3 7:34 7:40 8 10

316 c Conv. 8:26 8:34 8 17 b261 B DC 3 10:12 10:22 10 15

564 B Conv. 10:34 10:44 10 12 b71 TT DC 3 10:51 10:54 3 3

3 B Conv. 1:14 1:24 10 11

a - no Sunday schedule b - no Saturday schedule *Data compiled from total enplaned and deplaned passengers taken

during 6 average weeks throughout 1956; Jan. 22-28, March 25-31, June 3-9, Sept. 16-22, Nov. 18-24, Dec. 16-22.

Abbreviations: B - Braniff; C - Continental; TT - Trans-Texas; Conv. - Convair Note: See following Chart A-1

-16-

PEAK - HOURS PASSENGERS

1956 Airline Activity

US Enplaned Passengers Austin Enplaned Passengers Austin Enp. Pass. ~ US Enp. Pass.

1956 Peak Hours

From CAA chart C-2 Peak hours passengers From actual count peak hour passengers

40, 752,563 * 69,672 **

.171%

• 68 for 1956 = 68 for 1956

Therefore Austin can be considered a typical station as compared with the national average.

1970 Forecast

US Enplaned Passengers Austin Enp. Pass. = .00171 x 118,000,000 = Austin Total Passengers 2 x 201,780 •

From CAA chart C-2 peak hour passengers

1980 Forecast

US Enplaned Passengers Austin Enp. Pass. . 00171 x 168 M Austin - Total annual passengers

From CAA chart C-2 peak hour passengers

-17-*Source: CAA

** Source: Airline Records

=

118,000,000 * 201,780 403,560

162

168,000,000 * = 287,280 = 574,560

= 230

- 0 .J ...

...

"' ...

0

.... o

"' "' ... "' z 0 ..... ., "' <t 0

... 0

.J

<t

.... 0

....

... "' <t a:O

... > <to

7

c

"' "' ci z .... l::

"' ::; IL

I*

g ci z

.... l::

~ 1;1

0 z ... l::

"' ::; IL

I

8 9

*

I ~

., "' .. ,

i

~ I I ' ~

c . c 0 V I

* -~0 S N A

+ ~ 0 s Tl RIA

10 II

•

I

CH~D ~L SCH 0 LE

NOON 12

,_ II il "'

"' ...

c

"" j;j

LENGTH 0 F

2 4

E ~~ ~

c 0 N T I

II ~ !

T R A N 5

TIME 0 N R A M P

5 6 7 8 9

c c

+

... """' U')

"' "' "' ~ F F

c

+

II rl

:! 1'-

"' N E N T A L

~ Iii ~~~ I i

T E X A 5~ ;.

A I R LIN E s c H ROBERT MUELLER A U S T I N AVERAGE PASSENGERS PER

10 II

c

I I

~ ... "' "'

i ;:

E D U L

MIDNIGHT 12

E 5 MUNICIPAL

FLIGHT a TIME

2

c

I I ,.,

19 58

AIRPORT T E X A S

ON RAMP

A-1

CENTER OF RUNWAY

TAXIING

CLEARANCE

I

I I I I I I I I I I \ \

75' MINIMUM

TURF

75' NINIMUM

PAVED TAXISTRIP

TURF

''--~--------------r--~~ 0

in CD ... --- ....... ,.--------- ~ TAXIING a ' / t! \ NANE I I TURF (IN 1ST w

I \ S'tZW3E) t--01

___ ,./ .... (f)

~ --------- .... -

CLEARANCE ~ 1&.

(f) 0 z

0 0 iii 1'1)

z IIJ :IIi 0

L 0 A D N G A P R 0 N

AVERAGE OF 1!50' ON CENTERS PROBABLY SUFFICIENT FOR APRON PLANNING FOR AIR· CRAFT OF IMMEDIATE FUTURE. AVERAGE OF 175' MAY BE DESIRABLE AT SOME AIRPORTS. MANEUVERING AREA, PARKING APRON AND CLEARANCES ARE INCREASED OVER THOSE SHOWN FOR SINGLE RUNWAY PATTERN TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE CLEAR· ANCE FOR OPERATION OF AIRCRAFT WITH GREATER WING SPAN. ALSO TWO· WAY TAXIING IS PROVIDED FOR LARGER AIRCRAFT DUE TO INCREASED APRON ACTIVITY WITH LARGER NUMBER OF LOADING POSITIONS.

SCALE IN FEET

100~~50~~0~~~'0~0----2~00~~~300._ ... 4~00~~~500

0 z 01

« 0 1&.

:2 0

:IE ;::)

2: z i ·o ~

·o 10 ...

A-2

1000000 ~-- --~

800 000

t --I

-

600000 ·- --i -- .. ---·-

400000 I I

~:"'~ 379,~00 -- ---r------ -- ---- - --

._,. I --~ r

~2e1,ooo 1

- ----·- .• ~ ~·'::.~ I 200Mt1 -------

.... ---, ----r--~

~· 204,000

I ••• I I ' I ··2 I

I ~ I 100.000 I

__ 80.000 ;·· J_ ~ --- -+ --

1--- - ------ ··----r----.... -- t_ -------- --

.L_ - -- ••• ~ - .. ---,-----

' 60000 - ! L- --- -t-- -----...... •••••••• ~ -- -- ---- I ••• ~-· / 40000 --~·- r-- -- ------- -- -~ •• , ....... ... -+ I

e.-~-- ----- - --- - -· ! •••

;.··

~ -----+-----I

~ i _ _gQ.Q.oo--+- • !I ----- ------------ ---- ----

~~~ ----t----- - . ----------1

•• I ' i •• i ' •• v '

I

I

••• ~· I i '

I I !

• 10000 -··· 1.._ f-- --· -- --- -+ --f-- ' ----c 8000 ~· - ·- - --~ ---- ~-----~ + 6000 •• - ---

•• - 4.QO.Q- •• ~ --

~·· ,.........

2000 I I I 1000 I

1850 v 1860 1870

'"CI I I-'

1629

I f ., --------

1880

--- . - LEGEND:

--- t--- --t----~ -----+---- •••••••••••••••••••• IIIIIIIIIIIIIUUIIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ----- ----

--f------ t--

t--- t--

--- ----- -- --------t---· ---- 1--·

1890 1900 1910 1920

POPULATION RATE OF GROWTH CITY OF AUSTIN

TRAV 15

CITY OF

1930 1940

CHART COMPARISON

TRAVIS COUNTY

COUNTY

AUSTIN

1950

FORECAST ·------FORECAST

-- ------

1960 1970 1980

! r--

1990 2000

10000 ----8.000

.. ---r-· - i -

. ~-~ ~ --- - - ---

____§,OM ·-----~- ---- - - --- 1---

---- ... ---- ---- -- ----~- I ----

-- -- --~- - ~ --

____4000 --·. - ---- ---- ---- --

--

_____2.900 " .... '"""'""""""" ---......... a'llll"""'

~:.::::: ~ 15,803,600 ~~697,36

••••••••• ......... .,.,.A

I 000 ..... -- 10,045,90(1 ----

800 • _,_ . - ·--- - . - ---~ ---

-- 75 994 !5 5 ~-'--~6-~00 r--§_DO ··- -- -- - ..... -

--, ...••..

- -- -·-- ,-•••••• ..--I"'"

400

••• ~ ••• .... --••••••• ~ 3,048,710

23,191,876 ~ 200 -- v

/ 100 -- -

80 - LEGEND: 60

"""""" -·-· - ••••••••••••••••••••• IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIHIIIIIIIIUIIHU - ----~ u.s. POP. IN 100,000'$ FORECAST

/ --

40 ------TEXAS POP. IN 1o.ooo·s FORECAST

/ -

---~--- ·- ,--- ~---

~(. ... 20 --j--· - --- j--- --- -

10 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000

POPULATION CHART RATE OF GROWTH COMPARISON STATE OF TEXAS UNITED STATES

--

)> 0 ~ c: )> r

c: ~(/) o·

- )> CD­UI::U Q)r

g)~ ., 0"0 ::0)> 1"1(/) 0(1) J>m (/)Z ~C)

1"1 ~ ::u 0(/)

-)> Ul z CDz Oc:

)> --r ~r ;= -< r 0 z (/)

0 I I-'

180

_160

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

16

12

8

6 1946

- -

I' II/

-/ ~ ~.,

~~

1948 1950

-- - - - - --.......

-··••' ... ...... ,-••••• 'ita ooc 000 ..... ..,.. ·-· ....... ~.. ..•... ll ...

•••• .... ....., ..••. -..,. ~- ..... 403,56:> -· ~· /

,. ..... .... ••• ,.. ......

... fill' .... .. .., ....... ~ ...... . ... ~

" _ ..... - ... ~ / "'40,7S2

563 -·· ...

~ 201,78)

/ •••• • ~ ~~ •• ....... / v / , .139,66€

/ ~

/ / ~

~ v / ~

LEGEND :

k:::E -.. ·-----· ,. U. S. ENPLANED FORECAST

~ •••••••••••••••• ,, ACTUAL TOTAL AIRLINE FORECAST PASSENGERS - AUSTIN

;~ m~~--~-IUUIWWJJIWUWIIWIIIIIItlu. #fiJ I E PLANE FORECAST

1952 1954 956 1958 1960 1962 1964 1966 1968 970 1972 1974

P A S S E N G E R AIRLINE u. s. a AUSTIN,

T R E N 0 T. E X A S

- -168,0 :>o,ooq4• •••••

~-······ 574 560

•••• 114t

~·······

2 187 280 .......

1976 1978 1980

-19oo laoo

1700

I600

1500

400

300

200

100

80

60

40

30

-

)>

c: (/) ~

z

)>

::u r z 1"1

"0 l> (/) (/) 1"1 z C) 1"1 ::u (/)

)> z z c: )> r r -<

~ % 0 c: (/) )> z 0 (/)

0

' "'

400

380

360

340

320

300

280

260

240

220

200

180

160

140

120

100

80

~

40

20

0

I

~ v

~ It'

~ " ,

2 3 4 500000 6 7 8 9 1.000000 II

~ ~

/ ~

/ ~ ~

~ ~

/ ,

/ v 1980 FORECAST --/

~

~ 1970

162 403,560

v v

v

TYPICAL PEAK

RELATED TO TOTAL

230 PEAK HR. PASSENGERS

574,560 TOTAL ANNUAL PASSENGERS

FORECAST PEAK HR. PASSENGERS

TOTAL ANNUAL PASSENGERS

HOUR

ANNUAL

PASSENGERS

PASSENGERS

TOTAL ANNUAL PASSENGERS

DATA FliOM. U.S. DEPARlMENT OF COMMERCE CIVIL AERONAUTICS ADMINISTRATION

0 • ..

12 400

380

360

340

320

300

280

1260

240

. 220

200

180

160

14<:

120

IOC

eo

60

4C

20

0 r

I 24 00

-

0

~

~

36

~ v

"

48 60 72 84 96 108 120 132 144 156 168 OSEATS ¢ 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 SQ. FT.

.

~ """' ~

~ v

l/ ~

~ ,

l/ ,.

v I ~ 1980 FORECAST

K- 230 PEAK HR.PASSENGERS 102 SEATS IN WAITING ROOM

l/ 4250 SQ. FT. IN WAITING ROOM

I

v • , l/

... v I~ ~

]/

w A T N G REQUIREMENTS SPACE

B y P E A K H 0 U R

1970 FORECAST 162 PEAK HR. PASSENGERS 74 SEATS IN WAITING ROOM

3080 SQ. FT. IN WAITING ROOM

R 0 0 M AS DETERMINED

PASSENGERS

DATA fROM U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE CIVIL AERONAUTICS ADMINISTRATION

400

380

360

340

320

300

280

260

240

220

200

180

160

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

12 100 180

~

24 200 360

],..-~

,..

36 300 570

48 400 780

60 500

1000

72 600 1220

84 700 1460

96 800 1730

108 900

2000

I/ I/

!A

120 1000

2280

v 1/

132 1100

2580

J v 7

144 <) LINEAL FEET, COUNTER 1200 <) SQUARE FEET, WORK AREA

2880 <) SQUARE FEET TICKET LOBBY •

I .,

1980 FORECAST

230 PEAK HR. PASSENGERS

99 L. FT. COUNTER

825 SQ. FT. WORK AREA

1/ 179B sa. FT. TICKET LOBBY

l/ I 1 1 1970 FORECAST

~ 162 PEAK HR. PASSENGERS

77 L. FT. COUNTER

~ 640 SQ. FT. WORK AREA

1316 SQ. FT. TICKET LOBBY

~ .,.

v ~ ~

~

PASSENGER SPACE

SERVICE COUNTER a TICKET LOBBY REQUIREMENTS AS DETERMINEO

8 y P E A K H 0 U R PASSENGERS

DATA FRail. U.S. DEPARTMENT CF COMMERCE CML AERONAUTICS AOMINISTRATIQM

400

380

360

340

320

300

280

260

240

2~0

200

180

160

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

0

"'

6 90

~ ,

I~ 180

~

~ ~ ,

18 ~70

/ ~ ,

,

24 360

30 450

36 540

42 630

I ~"

I

48 720

I ~" 1/

54 810

¢ LINEAL FEET OF COLtiTER OR RAIL ¢ SQUARE FEET EACH WORK AREA S LOeBY

/ j 1980 FORECAST

* 230 PEAK HR. PASSENGERS

33 L. FT. COUNTER OR RAIL , 495 SQ. FT EA , WORK AREA a LOBBY

I I I I I

/ I I I I I

)t 1970 FORECAST

162 PEAK HR. PASSENGERS

25 L. FT. COUNTER OR RAIL

370 SQ. FT. EA., WORK AREAS LOBBY

BAGGAGE CLAIMS SPACE B y

REQUIREMENTS AS DETERMINED

P E A K H 0 U R PASSENGERS

""'"""' U.S. OEPARTliiENT a' CONMERCE CIVL AERONAUTlCS ADMINISTRATION

0

0>

400 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12poo SQUARE FEET

380 1/ 36Cl

34C

320 i' 300

280 ~~ ~ ~' g2SCJ I

~~ ~~ ~ 1980 FORECAST ~---t--~~~-f--~--f---~-f--~--t-~---t--f---~-f--+-~ ; 2

20 230 PEAK HR. PASSENGERS H--t-.-,

5 7750 SQUARE FEET ~~~--.,~~q---~-f--~--f-~~-f--~--t-~---t--f---~-t--+-~

~~ ~ ~ ~~1~8~0~-t-~-+-+--+-+--+-+--+-+--4-4-~~~~~-t-~-t-~-+-+ qo~~~ --~~~ -~~

-' 1970 FORECAST ~ ~<:> """'.,. ~RGO ~ 5800 SQUARE FEET ..o liS... J f- 140 ..1 "-"' ~ ,

<3 160 162 PEAK HR PASSENGERS ---t--f-~---f--~--+-~---t V# ~G..,q ~~

IW ~ /~~~(~~~-~----""-"t---f-+--+-1--+--+-t--vh,.-+-t--+-i--+--+-t--+---1-+--+ ~~ .. ~ T.a~J.. ~

IOQ ,~ LEGEND: ~~Uf"lv~r '.c:.."':\ 80 I.., MGR. •MANAGER ~ (sUI .. / I e

SUPV. "SUPERVISOR tF ~~ --+--

6C ""' ~=~~~I~TIONS FLE~r-REAOY COMM /RfSV. --+--v RESV. "RESERVATIONS @-6

40 ~""" LOCKERS SERVI~ 0 . . 20

0

...o L.l - SPACE RELATIONSHIPS ---+---""""',.. - DIRECT - - SECONDARY

1r

AIRLINE OPERATIONS SPACE REQUIREMENTS AS DETERMINED

BY PEAK HOUR PASSENGERS

OATA FROM: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE CIVIL AERONAUTICS ADMINISTRATION

400 1000

~R~

360

340

320

300

'~ 1980 FORECAST

:_aru) 230 PEAK HR. PASSENGERS 1500 SQ. FT. KITCHEN 8 STOR.

:240 1--r--

:220

.__gQQ 1970 FORECAST 162 PEAK HR. PASSENGERS

1200 SQ. FT. KITCHEN 8 STOR./ 180 •

1'---4 160

140 • 120

I ~

I 100 •• 80 'f

.... l/ 60 ••

40 -··· .., ~ •••• ~

I"" 20 """ • I 0 I=

0

2000 3000

• II L'

~

I I ii

I • • • i ~ • I ,

~ ,

~

-If v ,

~ ~ ~

PUBLIC EATING SPACE REQUIREMENTS BY PEAK HOUR

4000 5000

J r ,

/ J

,. , " /

1980 FORECAST

230 PEAK HR. PASSENGERS

3000 SQ. FT. EATING AREA

1970 FORECAST 162 PEAK HR. PASSENGERS

2400 SQ. FT. EATING AREA

¢SQUARE FEET

DATA FROM. U.S. OER\RTMENT OF COMMERCE CML AERONAUTICS ADMINISTRATION

FACILITIES •••••••• KITCHEN 6 STORAGE

AS DETERMINED EATING AREA

PASSENGERS

AIRCRAFT LOADING POSITIONS

\ VIEW A VIEW

\ I \

KITCHEN EATING FACILITIES

SERVICE CONCESSION

WAITING ROOM

REST ROOMS

BAGGAGE CLAIM

DISPATCH I

VEHICLE PLATFORM

DIRECT __ _

C>

' Q) TERMINAL BUILDING SPACE

.A I \

VIEW

I

AIRLINE OPERATIONS

PASSENGER SERVICE COUNTER

TICKET LOBBY

- - - SECONDARY

I I I I MAIL

I EXPRESS CARGO

I I I I ·- SERVICE

D.tml. fROM. U.S DEPARTMENT OF COt.NERCE CIVIL AERONAUTICS ADMINISTRATION

RELATIONSHIPS

i~ ...................... ~tr ................. 2 ................ 1t , . , .

I , E . ~ . • *~ • • • • • = = • • • • • • . ... . • I • • a • • = • • • • = • : 511 IUIIIIIIIIIIUIIIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII;i" I : • • • AIRCRAFT LOADING I FINGER • . :.. . . ~·----------1 . • •

I I_ I I • I • • • • • • I • • • • I • • • • I • • • • • • I • • • • I • • • • • • I . . ~ . = ~ : • • : I •••••••••••••••• : I t 5 I 5 : I : : DINING WAITING I :PASSENGER

=. c 0 N G E 5 s I 0 N s I • c 0 u N T E R, T 0 I L E T : B A G G A G E,

: ~ I :TICKETS, + = I + ETc.

··~··········.,l.l.... • .. ii - -r~. = •• BAGGAGE== 1:

CLAIM Ei IE !. ~ i E • = I : • = • : § I : : i I • :§VEHICULAR PLATFORM :

+..;.. I :

~--- BOARDING PASSENGERS

~111111111111111111 UNLOADING PASSENGERS

~··••••• BAGGAGE

TERMINAL BUILDING

GENERAL FLOW DIAGRAM c-9

'B' I \

••••••••••••••••••••••• . -----• • .. • a ..• • • • • • .. • a .• • • • • ... • = • • .. c• •

Li

~-,

/ ' I

\ I " / ~----

• a ..•

ONE-LEVEL FINGER SYSTEM

•••

I II II II I II IIIII

111111 ONE-LEVEL FRONTAL SYSTEM

\ I

I '- / --

"B'

RISSENGERS.-. • ••• •• BAGGAGE

AIRCRAFT LOADING ONE LEVEL

POSITIONS SYSTEM C-10

•o. 4-4------,

•

••••••••• • • • •

• •

• • ...... , ....•

"

TWO-LEVEL FINGER SYSTEM • D • 4-------'

I TWO-LEVEL FRONTAL SYSTEM

PASSENGERS • - • • • • • • .. BAGGAGE

AIRCRAFT LOADING

TWO LEVEL

POSITIONS

SYSTEM C-11

AIRCRAFT LOADING

SECTION "A~'A"

SECTION "s'~a"

,. ...... ,. c --::::> • •

• ....

.... ...

.. . ·: .... + -t .. ~···~

·!.\ "· •

• ••••••

-PASSENGERS

SECTION "c'!.!c"

POSITIONS

BAGGAGE <llll • •• ...

Data canpUae!l from Information provided through the court.sy of the Civil Aeronautics Administration

c- 12

SCALI ' 1• • •oo•. o•

MASTER PLAN _ STAGE I

BUILDING E RM 1 NAL T MUNICIPAL AIRPORT ROBERT MUELLER T E X A 5 A U S T I N

0 F F C E 0 F F E H R A N 0 G R A N G E R A. I . A .

LEGEND

Concessions and Rental Areas R-1 Concessions, News, Novelties, Etc. R-2 Lockers R-3 Telephones R-4 Vending Machines R-5 Insurance Machines R-6 Travel Insurance Sales R-7 Car Rental Systems R-8 Rental Offices

CAA Facilities C-1 ATCS Operations Room C-2 ATCS Chief Office C-3 ATCS Operations Room Storage C-4 Tower Chief Office C-5 ATCS Tower and Equipment Room C -6 Service Area C-7 Maintenance Storage C-8 SEMT Office C-9 Recorder Room in tower C-10 TELCO Room C-11 Tower Wiring Shaft C-12 Control Tower CAB C-13 Control Tower CAB Storage C-14 Control Tower Toilet C-15 Engine Generator Room in Basement

Weather Bureau W -1 Briefing and Observations W -2 MIC Office W -3 Briefing and Observations Storage W-4 Radar W -5 Electronic Technician W -6 Climatologist W-7 Engine Generator Room in Basement

Airport Administration A-1 Offices and Storage A-2 Storage A-4 Employees Toilet

Mechanical Equipment M-1 Mechanical Equipment Rooms M-2 Basement Area for Heating, Ventilating,

Air Conditioning and Mechanical Equipment

\

- ------- ~----.

I

"" / ,.' /'--., / ''- t ATt f __./'

;' ---------

- II:AIII,

-------------·----------__.J

FLOOR P LA N

I CAL[ •• ,., 'iJ..WI