Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Testing & Accountability Results North Forest Pines Elem, 2012-13
New Standards and Assessments
More rigorous curriculum More rigorous proficiency standards on new
assessments New AMO targets to align with new
assessments New accountability model w/ EVAAS growth
Historical AMO Status North Forest Pines Elem
Year AMO Status
2011-12 23/ 23 Target Met
2012-13 35/37 Targets Met (Not Met: AIG and Economically Disadvantage in Science)
2012-13 EOG MathPercent Level III or Higher by Subgroup
All
Stu
dent
s
Lev
el I
& I
I
Lev
el I
II
Lev
el I
V
Lev
IV
Not
AG
AG
SW
D
Not
SW
D
LE
P
Mul
ti-R
isk*
Fem
ale
Mal
e
Asi
an
Bla
ck
His
pani
c/L
atin
o
Whi
te
Mul
tirac
ial 0
20
40
60
80
100
70
43
97 95
98
22
77
13 13
70
70
21
46
83
56
2
39
96
93
99
22
61
25
17
55 57
77
35 37
75
5961
2
44
97
93
99
24
66
27
17
61 60
88
34
40
76
62
Grades 3-5 Math (alternate assessments included)
School Northeastern WCPSS* = At least 2 out of F/R Lunch, LEP, SWD Data not displayed for groups smaller than 15
Turn and talk
How do our results compare to the district averages?
What areas/subgroups appear to be doing better/worse than others?
What are the main things we need to focus on this year?
2012-13 EOG ReadingPercent Level III or Higher by Subgroup
All
Stu
dent
s
Lev
el I
& I
I
Lev
el I
II
Lev
el I
V
Lev
IV
Not
AG
AG
SW
D
Not
SW
D
LE
P
Mul
ti-R
isk*
Fem
ale
Mal
e
Asi
an
Bla
ck
His
pani
c/L
atin
o
Whi
te
Mul
tirac
ial 0
20
40
60
80
100
63
3
56
94
89
97
11
70
13 10
68
57
21
37
73
49
3
47
93
89
99
18
54
12 10
52
46
56
31 28
68
5754
3
49
94
89
99
19
60
15
10
57
51
76
30 29
70
57
Grades 3-5 Reading (alternate assessments included)
School Northeastern WCPSS* = At least 2 out of F/R Lunch, LEP, SWDData not displayed for groups smaller than 15 students
Turn and talk
How do our results compare to the district averages?
What areas/subgroups appear to be doing better/worse than others?
What are the main things we need to focus on this year?
2012-13 EOG SciencePercent Level III or Higher by Subgroup
All
Stu
dent
s
Lev
el I
& I
I
Lev
el I
II
Lev
el I
V
Lev
IV
Not
AG
AG
SW
D
Not
SW
D
LE
P
Mul
ti-R
isk*
Fem
ale
Mal
e
Asi
an
Bla
ck
His
pani
c/L
atin
o
Whi
te
Mul
tirac
ial 0
20
40
60
80
100
56
11
52
79
84
60
49
62
29
65
49
7
55
91
82
88
18
54
11 11
47
51
58
28 29
70
44
57
10
57
95
89
94
22
62
15 12
55 58
80
31
36
73
58
Grade 5 Science
School Northeastern WCPSS
386
N-Counts for 2012-13. Data not displayed for groups smaller than 15 students* = At least 2 out of F/R Lunch, LEP, SWD
Turn and talk
How do our results compare to the district averages?
What areas/subgroups appear to be doing better/worse than others?
What are the main things we need to focus on this year?
