37
Tests des Standardmodells der Teilchenphysik Spezialfach Kern-Teilchen-Astrophysik Tests of the Standard Model of Particles Winter Semester 2017 Lecture 3 Dr. Zinonas Zinonos [email protected] Max-Planck-Institut f¨ ur Physik, TUM November 2, 2017 1 / 37

Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

Tests des Standardmodells der Teilchenphysik

Spezialfach Kern-Teilchen-Astrophysik

Tests of the Standard Model of ParticlesWinter Semester 2017

Lecture 3

Dr. Zinonas [email protected]

Max-Planck-Institut fur Physik, TUM

November 2, 2017

1 / 37

Page 2: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

Overview

Particle Interactions and Useful Variables

Phase Space

Decay Rates

Cross Section

2 / 37

Page 3: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

Particle Interactions

Particle interactions are described in terms of Feynman diagrams

(a) Scattering (b) Annihilation (c) Interaction

1. Anti-particle arrows point in negative time direction

2. Energy, momentum, angular momentum, etc conserved at all interaction vertices

3. Intermediate particles are ”virtual: E2 6= |p|2 +m2

3 / 37

Page 4: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

Mandelstam VariablesIn particle interactions there are three particularly handy Lorentz invariant quantities: s, t & u

Consider any kind of a 2 particles→ 2 particles process: 1 + 2→ 3 + 4

(a)s-channel

(b) t-channel (c) u-channel

The 4-momenta pµ1 , pµ2 , pµ3 , and pµ4 of the 2 incoming and 2 outgoing particles satisfy 8constraints: the on-shell conditions for each particle

p21 = m2

1, p22 = m2

2, p23 = m2

3, p24 = m2

4, (1)

4 / 37

Page 5: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

and the net 4-momentum conservation

pµ1 + pµ2 = pµ3 + pµ4 . (2)

Altogether, this gives us 4× 4− 8 = 8 independent momentum variables, and the number ofindependent Lorentz-invariant combinations of these variables is only 8− 6 = 2.However, for practical purposes it’s is often convenient to use 3 Lorentz-invariant variables witha fixed sum,

s = (p1 + p2)2 = (p3 + p4)2, (3)

t = (p1 − p3)2 = (p4 − p2)2, (4)

u = (p1 − p4)2 = (p3 − p2)2. (5)

s + t + u = m21 + m2

2 + m23 + m2

4 . (6)

Indeed,

s + t + u = (p1 + p2)2 + (p1 − p3)2 + (p1 − p4)2 (7)

= 3p21 + p2

2 + p23 + p2

4 + 2(p1p2) − 2(p1p3) − 2(p1p4) (8)

= p21 + p2

2 + p23 + p2

4 + 2p1 × (p1 + p2 − p3 − p4 = 0) (9)

= p21 + p2

2 + p23 + p2

4 (10)

= m21 + m2

2 + m23 + m2

4 . (11)5 / 37

Page 6: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

The s, t, and u are called Mandelstam variables after Stanley Mandelstam who introducedthem in 1958.

Variable s: s = (p1 + p2)2 = (E1 + E2)2 − (p1 + p2)2

⇒The center-of-mass energy is a scalar product of two four-vectors 7−→ Lorentz invariant⇒Since this is a Lorentz-invariant quantity, it can evaluated in any inertial frame. Mostconvenient, the center-of-mass frame (CM):

p∗1 = (E∗1 , p∗), p∗2 = (E∗2 , −p∗) (12)

⇒ s = (E∗1 + E∗2 )2 (13)

In the center-of-mass frame where p1 + p2 = p1 + p4 = 0,√s is the total energy of the

colliding particles,√s = E1 + E2 = E3 + E4.

Also, for an elastic collision in the CM frame, t parametrizes the scattering angle according tot = −(p3 − p1)2 = −p2 × (1− cos θ).

Hence, the Lorentz-invariant definitions (3) translate the CM-frame energy and the CM-framescattering angle to any other frame of reference.

6 / 37

Page 7: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

All Lorentz-invariant combinations of the four momenta pµ1 , pµ2 , pµ3 , and pµ4 can be expressed interms of the Mandelstam variables. For example, the Lorentz products kµpµ of any twomomenta are

2(p1p2) = (p1 + p2)2 − p21 − p2

2 = s − m21 − m2

2 , (14)

2(p3p4) = (p3 + p4)2 − p23 − p2

4 = s − m23 − m2

4 , (15)

2(p1p3) = p21 + p2

3 − (p1 − p3)2 = m21 + m2

3 − t, (16)

2(p2p4) = p22 + p2

4 − (p2 − p4)2 = m22 + m2

4 − t, (17)

2(p1p4) = p21 + p2

4 − (p1 − p4)2 = m21 + m2

4 − u, (18)

2(p2p3) = p22 + p2

3 − (p2 − p3)2 = m22 + m2

3 − u. (19)

In particular, for an elastic scattering of 2 identical-mass particles

s + t + u = 4m2, (20)

2(p1p2) = 2(p3p4) = s − 2m2, (21)

2(p1p3) = 2(p2p4) = 2m2 − t, (22)

2(p1p4) = 2(p2p3) = 2m2 − u . (23)

7 / 37

Page 8: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

For future reference, let us write similar formulæ for the e−e+ → µ−µ+ pair-production in theultra-relativistic energy limit,

s + t + u = 2m2µ + 2m2

e ≈ 2m2µ, (24)

2(p1p2) = s − 2m2e ≈ s, (25)

2(p3p4) = s − 2m2µ, (26)

2(p1p3) = 2(p2p4) = m2µ + m2

e − t ≈ m2µ − t, (27)

2(p1p4) = 2(p2p3) = m2µ + m2

e − u ≈ m2µ − u. (28)

(29)

and for the e−e+ → γγ annihilation process p− + p+ → k1 + k2,

s + t + u = 2m2e , (30)

2(p−p+) = s− 2m2e , (31)

2(k1k2) = s, (32)

2(p−k1) = 2(p+k2) = m2e − t, (33)

2(p−k2) = 2(p+k1) = m2e − u . (34)

8 / 37

Page 9: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

Fermi’s Golden RuleThe physical quantities, or experimental observables, weneed to calculate in particle physics concerningtransition between states are:

I decay rates

I cross sectionsTransition rates are calculated with Fermi’s Golden Rule :

Γi→f = 2π|Tfi|2ρ(Ef ) (35)

where

I Γi→j : number of transitions per unit time from initial state |i〉 to final state |f〉I Tfi: transition matrix element

Tfi = 〈f |H|i〉+∑i 6=j

〈f |H|j〉 〈j|H|i〉Ei − Ej

+ . . . , H = perturbing Hamiltonian (36)

I ρ(Ef ): density of final states

9 / 37

Page 10: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

Rates depend on

I matrix element or amplitude M which contains all the dynamical information of theprocess

I density of states which encapsulates the process kinematics

For a proper calculation of decay and scattering processes we need

I relativistic calculations of particle decay rates and cross sections of scattering processes

σ =|M|2

flux× (phase space) (37)

where the phase space factor is just kinematics: it depends on the particle masses,energies, and momenta of the participants −→ reflects the fact that a given process ismore likely to occur the more ”room to develop” there is in the final state

I relativistic treatment of spin-half particles (Dirac Equation)

I relativistic evaluation of the interaction amplitude (Matrix Element)

I need a relativistic versionof the Golden Rule, derived from quantum filed theory (S-Matrix)– out of scope of this lecture

10 / 37

Page 11: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

Particle Decay RatesConsider the two-body decay: i → 1 + 2

Aim to calculate the decay rate in first order perturbation theoryusing plane-wave descriptions of the particles – Bornapproximation

ψ = Ne−ip·x = Ne−i(Et−p·x) (38)

In order to calculate decay rates we need in a Lorentz invariant form:1. The wave-function normalization N2. The transition matrix element Tfi from perturbation theory3. An expression for the density of states ρ(Ef )

Wave-function normalization:I Using a non-relativistic formulation so farI Non-relativistic form: plane wave normalized to one particle in a cube of dimension α

ρ =

∫d3x ψ∗ψ = N2α3 = 1 ⇒ N2 =

1

α3=

1

V(39)

11 / 37

Page 12: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

Phase Space (non-relativistic)

Wave-function vanishing at box boundaries 7−→ quantizedparticle momenta (px, py, pz) = 2π

α (nx, ny, nz)

Volume of single state in momentum space:(

2πα

)3= (2π)3

V

Normalization to one particle/unit volume will give number

of states in element d3p = dpxdpydpz =(

2πα

)3= (2π)3

V :

dn = 4πp2dp1

(2π)3/V× 1

V(40)

⇒The number of states dn with magnitude of momentum inthe range p −→ p+ dp, is equal to the momentum spacevolume of the spherical shell at momentum p with thicknessdp divided by the average volume occupied by a single state,(2π)3/V

(a) Wavefunction of a particle confined to a box of

side α satisfies the periodic boundary conditions such

that there are an integer number of wavelengths in each

direction: e.g. ψ(x + α, y, z) = ψ(x, y, z)

(b) Allowed states in the momentum space

12 / 37

Page 13: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

and hencedn

dp=

4πp2

(2π)3with d3p = 4πp2dp (41)

The density of states in Fermi’s golden rule then can be obtained from

ρ(Ef ) =

∣∣∣∣ dndE∣∣∣∣Ef

=

∣∣∣∣dndp dpdE∣∣∣∣Ef

with p = βE (42)

The density of states corresponds to the number of momentum states accessible to a particulardecay and increases with the momentum of the final-state particle.

Hence, all other things being equal, decays to lighter particles, which will be pro- duced withlarger momentum, are favoured over decays to heavier particles.

Integrating over an elemental shell in momentum-space gives

ρ(Ef ) =4πp2

(2π)3× β (43)

13 / 37

Page 14: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

Dirac δ Function

In the relativistic formulation of particle decay rates and process cross sections the ”Diracδ-function” is commonly used.

The Dirac delta can be loosely thought of as a function on the real line which is zeroeverywhere except at the origin, where it is infinite,

δ(x) =

+∞, x = 0

0, x 6= 0(44)

and which is also constrained to satisfy the identity∫ ∞−∞

δ(x) dx = 1. (45)

⇒an ”infinitely narrow spike of unit area”

14 / 37

Page 15: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

∫ +∞

−∞dxδ(x− x0) = 1 (46)∫ +∞

−∞dxδ(x− x0)f(x) = f(x0) (47)

Any function with the above criteria can represent δ(x), e.g. an infinitesimally narrow Gaussianfunction

δ(x) = limσ→0

1√2π σ

e−x2

2σ2 (48)

In relativistic quantum mechanics, the Dirac δ-functions are extremely useful for integrals overphase-space, e.g. particle decay i→ 1 + 2 + . . .+ f∫

dE . . . δ(Ei − E1 − E2 − . . .− Ef );

∫d3p . . . δ(pi − p1 − p2 − . . .− pf ) (49)

express energy and momentum conservation.

15 / 37

Page 16: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

In integrating the phase space, an expression for the δ-function of a function is typicallyrequired δ (f(x))

From the definition of the δ-function∫ y2

y1

dy δ(y) =

1 y1 < y = 0 < y2

0 otherwise(50)

Expressing in terms of y = f(x) where f(x0) = 0 and then change variables∫ x2

x1

dxdf(x)

dxδ(f(x)) =

1 x1 < x = x0 < x2

0 otherwise(51)

16 / 37

Page 17: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

The δ-function is only non-zero at x = x0∣∣∣∣df(x)

dx

∣∣∣∣x0

∫ x2

x1

dx δ(f(x)) =

1 x1 < x = x0 < x2

0 otherwise(52)

The right-hand side can be rearranged and expressed as a δ-function∫ x2

x1

dx δ(f(x)) =1

|df/dx|x0

∫ x2

x1

dx δ(x− x0) (53)

Finally,

δ (f(x)) =

∣∣∣∣df(x)

dx

∣∣∣∣−1

x0

δ(x− x0) (54)

17 / 37

Page 18: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

Golden Rule Revisited

The classical versionΓif = 2π|Tfi|2ρ(Ef ) (55)

can be rewritten by changing the expression for density of states using a δ-function

ρ(Ef ) =

∣∣∣∣ dndE∣∣∣∣Ef

=

∫dE

dn

dEδ(E − Ei) since Ef = Ei (56)

⇒Energy conservation is now taken into account explicitly by δ-function when integrating overall final state energies

Therefore, for quantum mechanical transition rates, the Golden Rule takes the form

Γfi = 2π

∫dn |Tfi|2δ(Ei − E) (57)

where the integral is over all allowed final states of any energy.

18 / 37

Page 19: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

For the special case of a two-body decay , we only needto consider one particle in dn

dn =d3p

(2π)3(58)

since momentum conservation fixes the other

Γfi =

∫d3p1

(2π)3|Tfi|2(2π)δ(Ei − E1 − E2) (59)

However, the explicit momentum conservation is typically included when integrating over themomenta of both outgoing particles by introducing yet another δ-function

Γfi =

∫d3p1

(2π)3

d3p2

(2π)3︸ ︷︷ ︸density of states

|Tfi|2 (2π)4 δ(Ei − E1 − E2)︸ ︷︷ ︸energy cons.

δ(3)(pi − p1 − p2)︸ ︷︷ ︸momentum cons.

(60)

19 / 37

Page 20: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

Lorentz Invariant Phase Space

In non-relativistic Quantum Mechanicswave-functions are normalized to oneparticle/unit volume∫

d3x ψ∗ψ = 1 (61)

On the other hand, when consideringrelativistic effects, the original normalizationvolume contracts by a factor of 1/γ

γ = E/m = 1/√

1− β2 (62)

Therefore, particle density increases by γ =⇒ a relativistically invariant wave-functionnormalization must be proportional to E particles per volume , such that the increase inenergy accounts for the effect of Lorentz contraction.

20 / 37

Page 21: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

Wave-functions with the appropriate Lorentz-invariant normalization, denoted as ψ′, arenormalized to 2E particles per unit volume∫

d3x ψ′∗ψ′ = 2E (63)

Hence, ψ′ =√

2E ψ is normalized to 2E per unit volume.

For a general process, a+ b+ · · · → 1 + 2 + · · · , the Lorentz-invariant matrix element, usingwave-functions with a Lorentz-invariant normalization, is defined and related to the transitionmatrix element of Fermis golden rule by

Mij = 〈ψ′1ψ′2 . . .|H ′|ψ′aψ′b . . .〉 =√

2E1 2E2 . . . 2Ea 2Eb . . . Tfi (64)

where the product on the energies includes all initial- and final-state particles.

21 / 37

Page 22: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

For the two-body decay i→ 1 + 2, the process amplitude is

Mij = 〈ψ′1ψ′2|H ′|ψ′i〉 (65)

=√

2E1 2E2 2Ei 〈ψ1ψ2|H|ψi〉 =√

2E1 2E2 2Ei Tfi (66)

Using the above relation between the transition matrix element and the Lorentz invariantmatrix element, Eq. (60) can be written as

Γfi =1

2Ei

∫d3p1

(2π)32E1

d3p2

(2π)32E2(2π)4δ(Ei − E1 − E2)δ(3)(pi − p1 − p2) |Mfi|2 (67)

I Mfi uses relativisticlly normalized wave-fucntions −→ Lorentz invariant

I d3p(2π)32E represents the Lorentz Invariant Phase Space (LIPS) for each final state particle –

the 2E factor arises from the wave-function normalization

I the integral over the phase space is now frame independent , i.e. Lorentz invariant

I Γfi is inversely proportional to the energy of the decaying particle, Ei (expected from timedilation E = γm)

I δ-functions ensure energy-momentum conservation

22 / 37

Page 23: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

Two-Body Decay Rate

Let’s examine further the case of a two-body decay process.Because the integral over the phase space is Lorentzinvariant, we can evaluate it in any frame – the CM frameturns to be the most convenient one!

In CM frame, Ei = mi and pppi = 0 and hence

Γfi =1

8π2mi

∫d3p1

2E1

d3p2

2E2δ(mi − E1 − E2)δ(3)(p1 + p2) |Mfi|2 (68)

Integrating over p2 using the momentum-space δ-function

Γfi =1

8π2mi

∫d3p1

4E1E2δ(mi − E1 − E2) |Mfi|2 (69)

The δ-function imposes p2 = −p1 and thus E22 = m2

2 + p21 (here for convenience p1 = |p1|)

In spherical polar coordinates: d3p = p2dp dΩ with dΩ = d cos θ dφ and thus...

23 / 37

Page 24: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

Γfi =1

32π2mi

∫dp1 dΩ δ

(mi −

√m2

1 + p21 −

√m2

2 + p21

)p2

1

E1E2|Mfi|2 (70)

At first sight this integral looks quite tricky, however, the Dirac delta-function will simplify thewhole picture. The expression above has the functional form

Γfi =1

32π2mi

∫dΩ dp1 δ (f(p1)) g(p1) |Mfi|2 (71)

where

g(p1) =p2

1

E1E2and f(p1) = mi −

√m2

1 + p21 −

√m2

2 + p21 (72)

I δ (f(p1)) will impose energy conservation and is only non-zero for p1 = p, p is the solutionof f(p) = 0

I f(p1) determines the CM momenta of the two decay particles, i.e. f(p1) = 0 for p1 = p

Eq. (70) can be then integrated using the δ-function property of Eq. (54)∫dp1 g(p1) δ (f(p1)) =

1

|df/dp1|p

∫dp1g(p1)δ(p1 − p) =

g(p)

|df/dp1|p(73)

24 / 37

Page 25: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

It remains to evaluate df/dp1:

df(p1)

dp1= − 2p1

2(m21 + p2

1)− 2p1

2(m22 + p2

1)= − p1

E1− p1

E2= −p1

E1 + E2

E1E2(74)

leading Eq. (73) top21

E1E2/∣∣∣−p1

E1+E2

E1E2

∣∣∣p1=p

=∣∣∣ p1E1+E2

∣∣∣p1=p

and thus

Γfi =1

32π2mi

∫dΩ

∣∣∣∣ p1

E1 + E2

∣∣∣∣p1=p

|Mfi|2 (75)

By imposing energy conservation mi = E1 + E2, f(p1) = 0 (Eq. (72)) we obtain the generalexpression for any two-body decay ,

1

τ≡ Γfi =

|p|32π2m2

i

∫dΩ |Mfi|2 (76)

The momentum of either of the final-state particles in the center-of-mass frame p can beobtained from energy conservation, or equivalently f(p1) = 0 in Eq (72):

|p| = 1

2mi

√(m2

i − (m1 +m2)2) (m2i − (m1 −m2)2) (77)

25 / 37

Page 26: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

Cross Section DefinitionIn scattering processes, the interaction rate per targetparticle Rb is proportional to the incident particle flux Φaand can be written as

Rb = σ × Φa (78)

where σ is the most useful observable in scattering processes, the ”cross section”

⇒Can be thought as the effective cross-sectional area of the target particles (expression of theunderlying quantum mechanical probability) for the interaction to occur

σ =number of interactions per unit time per target

incident flux of particles(79)

Differential cross section :

dΩ=

number of interactions per unit time per target into solid angle dΩ

incident flux of particles(80)

with

dΩ = d cos θ dφ and σ =

∫dΩ

dΩ(81)

26 / 37

Page 27: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

Consider a single incoming particle of type α with velocity vα traversing a region of area Acontaining nb particles of type b per unit volume

In time δt a particle of type α traverses regioncontaining nb (vα + vb)Aδt.

The interaction probability P obtained from the effective cross-sectional area occupied bynb(vα + vb)Aδt particles of type b is given by

P =nb(vα + vb)Aδt σ

A= nb v δt σ with v = vα + vb (82)

and thus the rate per particle of type α is

Rα = nb v σ (83)

Considering volume V for the entire reaction rate

R = (nb v σ)× (na V ) = (nb V )(na v) σ = Nb Φa σ (84)

and as anticipated

Rate = Number of targets× Flux× cross section (85)

27 / 37

Page 28: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

Cross Section CalculationConsider the scattering process 1 + 2→ 3 + 4.

Starting from Fermi’s Golden Rule:

Γfi =

∫d3p3

(2π)3

d3p4

(2π)3δ (E1 + E2 − E3 − E4)× (86)

δ(3) (p1 + p1 − p3 − p4) |Tfi|2

where Tfi stands for the transition matrix for a normalization 1/unit volume,we can write

rate

volume= (flux of particles 1)× (number density of particles 2)× σ (87)

= n1(v1 + v2)× n2 × σ (88)

and thus for 1 target particle per unit volume : rate = (v1 + v2)× σ ⇒ σ =Γfiv1+v2

giving

σ =1

v1 + v2︸ ︷︷ ︸not L.I.

∫d3p3

(2π)3

d3p4

(2π)3︸ ︷︷ ︸not L.I.

(2π)4δ (E1 + E2 − E3 − E4) δ(3) (p1 + p1 − p3 − p4) |Tfi|2︸ ︷︷ ︸not L.I.

(89)28 / 37

Page 29: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

In order to obtain a Lorentz invariant form of the cross-section we must:

I use wave-functions normalized to 2E particles per unit volume: ψ′ =√

2E ψ

I define a Lorentz invariant matrix element Mfi = (2E1 2E2 2E3 2E4)1/2Tfi

Therefore,

σ =1

2E1 2E2 (v1 + v2)

∫d3p3

2E3(2π)3

d3p4

2E4(2π)3(2π)4δ (E1 + E2 − E3 − E4)× (90)

δ(3) (p1 + p1 − p3 − p4) |Mfi|2

and the integral is now termed in a Lorentz invariant form.

The quantity F = 2E12E2(v1 + v2) can be written in terms of a four-vector scalar product(Lorentz invariant flux):

F = 2E1 2E2(v1 + v2) = 4E1 E2

(|p1|E1

+|p2|E2

)(91)

= 4 (|p1|E2 + |p2|E1) (92)

29 / 37

Page 30: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

To prove that this is Lorentz invariant we first consider

p1 · p2 = pµ1p2µ = E1E2 − |p1||p2| cos θ = E1E2 + |p1||p2| for θ = π (93)

leading to

F 2

16− (pµ1p2µ)

2= (|p1|E2 + |p2|E1)

2 − (E1E2 + |p1||p2|)2 (94)

= |p1|2(E22 − |p2|2) + E2

1(|p2|2 − E22) = |p1|2m2

2 − E21m

22 (95)

= −m21m

22 (96)

F = 4

√(p1 · p2)

2 −m21m

22 (97)

Consequently, the cross section is a Lorentz invariant quantity. Special cases:

CM Frame p1 = −p2 = p

F = 4E1E2(v1 + v2)

= 4E1E2(|p|/E1 + |p|/E2)

= 4|p|(E1 + E2) = 4|p|√s

Target at rest p2 = 0

F = 4E1E2(v1 + v2)

= 4E1m2v1 = 4E1m2|p1|/E1

= 4m2|p1|30 / 37

Page 31: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

Two-to-two Particle Scattering

Let’s specialize our cross section formulation on the 2→ 2 scattering case in the CM frame:p1 + p2 = 0 and

√s = E1 + E2

Eq. (98) will become

σ =1

4|p∗i |√s (2π)2

∫d3p3

2E3

d3p4

2E4δ(√s− E3 − E4

)δ(3) (p3 + p4) |Mfi|2 (98)

This integral is exactly the same that appeared in the particle decay calculation in Eq. (68) butwith m1 replaced by

√s in Eq. (76), thus

σ =1

4|p∗i |√s (2π)2

|p∗f |4√s

∫dΩ∗ |Mfi|2 (99)

σ =1

64π2s

|p∗f ||p∗i |

∫dΩ∗ |Mfi|2 (100)

31 / 37

Page 32: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

In the case of elastic scattering : |p∗f | = |p∗i | and thus

σelastic =1

64π2s

∫dΩ∗ |Mfi|2 (101)

To calculate the total cross section , which is Lorentz invariant, the formula of Eq. (100) issufficient.

Note that for calculating the differential cross section in a rest frame other than the CMframe, the angles in the infinitesimal solid angle dΩ∗ = d cos θ∗ dφ∗ refer to the CM frame

dσ =1

64π2s

|p∗f ||p∗i ||Mfi|2 dΩ∗ (102)

We therefore need to seek for a Lorentz invariant expression for dσ. This can be achieved byexpressing dΩ∗ in terms of the Mandelstam variable t

32 / 37

Page 33: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

(a) Scattering in the CM frame (b) t Mandelstam variable

Using the definition of t, a product of four-vectors and thus Lorentz invariant,

t ≡ q2 = (p1 − p3)2 (103)

we can express dΩ∗ in terms of Lorentz invariant dt,

t = (p1 − p3)2 = p21 + p2

3 − 2p1 · p3 = m21 +m2

3 − 2p1 · p3 (104)

and in the CM frame...

33 / 37

Page 34: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

p∗µ1 = (E∗1 , 0, 0, |p∗1|) and p∗µ3 = (E∗3 , |p∗3| sin θ∗, 0, |p∗3| cos θ∗) (105)

p1 · p3 = E∗1E∗3 − |p∗1|p∗3| cos θ∗ (106)

t = m21 +m2

3 − E∗1E∗3 + 2|p∗1|p∗3| cos θ∗ (107)

⇒ dt = 2|p∗1|p∗3|d cos(θ∗) (108)

=⇒ dΩ∗ = d cos(θ∗)dφ∗ =dt dφ

2|p∗1|p∗3|(109)

Hence, we can write dσ as

σ =1

64π2 s

|p∗3||p∗1||Mfi|2 dΩ∗ =

1

2× 64π2 s

1

|p∗1|2|Mfi|2 dφ∗dt (110)

Finally, assuming no dependence of the matrix element on the azimuthal angle, we canintegrate over dφ∗ and obtain

dt=

1

64π s |pi|2|Mfi|2 (111)

34 / 37

Page 35: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

Lorentz Invariant Differential Cross Section

All parts in the expression of dσ/dt are Lorentz invariant and hence it applied to anyreference frame.

It is worth noting that |pi|2 is a constant scalar quantity fixed by energy-momentumconservation

|pi|2 =1

4s

(s− (m1 +m2)2

) (s− (m1 −m2)2

)(112)

One representative example of how to make use of the invariant expression of dσ/dt is theelastic scattering in the laboratory frame in the limits where the mass of the colliding particlecan be safely neglected, E1 m1

In this limit, |pi|2 = (s−m2)2

4s and hence

dt=

1

16π(s−m22)2|Mfi|2 for m1 ' 0 (113)

35 / 37

Page 36: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

SummaryWe used a Lorentz invariant formulation of Fermi’s Golden Rule to derive decay rates andcross sections in terms of Lorentz invariant Matrix Element M based on wave-functionsnormalized to 2E/unit volume.

Main Results:

I Particle decay rate / inverse life time:

1

τ≡ Γfi =

|p|32π2m2

i

∫dΩ |Mfi|2 (114)

with |p| being a function of masses of the particles involved in the decay

|p| = 1

2mi

√(m2

i − (m1 +m2)2) (m2i − (m1 −m2)2) (115)

I Scattering cross section in CM frame:

σ =1

64π2s

|p∗f ||p∗i |

∫dΩ∗ |Mfi|2 (116)

36 / 37

Page 37: Tests of the Standard Model of Particles

Summary Cont’d

I Invariant differential cross section – valid in all frames:

dt=

1

64π s |pi|2|Mfi|2 (117)

⇒Have introduced the basis for kinematics of particle decays and scattering process

⇒The dynamics and fundamental particle physics are encapsulated in the matrix element

⇒We have all ingredients for calculations that will follow in this lecture!

37 / 37