38
1.1 INTRODUCTION Before mobile phones, human being communicated by meeting directly, sending letters or calling from home phones. Such ways usually made people have troubles for the expensiveness, difficulties in far communication or emergency and the loss of information. However, cell phone has improved the obstacle above. Text messaging (SMS) is cheaper and faster to transfer a lot of information, even to many people at the same time. They are so convenient that majority of population prefer to use them instead of some traditional ways. Nowadays, the usage of mobile phone is very common in youth. The main purpose for which youth is using mobile phone is to communicate with friends and others through text messaging. Texting is so extensively used that as a new variety of language, text messaging has been condemned as "textese", "slanguage", a "digital virus".Text messaging has become so widely used by youth that teachers have noticed a drastic change in students’ writing habits. Students are integrating the abbreviations that are used 1

Texting is Ruining Academic Writing in Youth

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

research paper about impact of text messaging on youth writing skills

Citation preview

1.1 INTRODUCTIONBefore mobile phones, human being communicated by meeting directly, sending letters or calling from home phones. Such ways usually made people have troubles for the expensiveness, difficulties in far communication or emergency and the loss of information. However, cell phone has improved the obstacle above. Text messaging (SMS) is cheaper and faster to transfer a lot of information, even to many people at the same time. They are so convenient that majority of population prefer to use them instead of some traditional ways. Nowadays, the usage of mobile phone is very common in youth. The main purpose for which youth is using mobile phone is to communicate with friends and others through text messaging. Texting is so extensively used that as a new variety of language, text messaging has been condemned as "textese", "slanguage", a "digital virus".Text messaging has become so widely used by youth that teachers have noticed a drastic change in students writing habits. Students are integrating the abbreviations that are used in texting into their academic writing. Texting is causing diversion in spelling, grammar and vocabulary of youth.Texters use deviant spellings and they know they are deviant. There are several distinctive features of the way texts are written that combine to give the impression of novelty. The most noticeable feature is the use of single letters, numerals, and symbols to represent words or parts of words, as with b "be" and 2 "to". They are called rebuses, and they go back centuries. Adults who condemn a "c u" in a young person's texting have forgotten that they once did the same thing themselves (though not on a mobile phone). Similarly, the use of initial letters for whole words (n for "no", gf for "girlfriend", cmb "call me back") is not at all new. People have been initializing common phrases for ages. IOU (I owe you) is known from 1618. There is no difference, apart from the medium of communication, between a modern kid's "lol" ("laughing out loud") and an earlier generation's "Swalk" ("sealed with a loving kiss"). In texts we find such forms as msg ("message") and xlnt ("excellent"). Almst any wrd cn be abbrvted in ths wy - though there is no consistency between texters. But this is not new either. However the popularity of text messaging is leading to the losing of written languages position. As a new variety of language, texting has been condemned as "textese", "slanguage", a "digital virus". People specially youth tend to use slangs and abbreviate words to shorten their writing and save more time. The outcome is that language in writing is not in its original form. So it is reasonable to question the impact of this type of communication on students writing skills.To get a better idea of the effects of texting on youth and how much this technology was actually being used, a research was conducted in which we asked questions to forty youngsters, specifically females aged 19-25 about their usage of text messaging.1.2 HYPOTHESIS

Texting is ruining academic writing in youth.

1.3 OBJECTIVESMain objectives of this thesis are following:

To address the challenges, because of the usage of text messaging in academic writing, to formal English.

To explore the extent to which texting is changing spelling, vocabulary and grammar of youth.

To describe features which can be said to characterize texting as a language variety. 1.4 SAMPLEWe have collected the data from youth whose age is from 19-25. The questionnaire was distributed among forty females. Our main target was youth and for this purpose we selected a sample of 20 females from our university and 20 from different public places. 1.5 METHODOLOGYOur research is based on quantitative and qualitative analysis. The procedures that we used in collecting the qualitative information include online articles, books, and journals. In addition, the quantitative information was collected through using close-ended questionnaire which comprises fourteen questions with five options (Strongly agree, Agree, Uncertain, Disagree, Strongly disagree).1.6 LITERATURE REVIEWIt is true that abbreviation words of formal English is not new at all. People have been initializing common phrases for ages. IOU (I owe you) is known from 1618. At the same time, it is also true that English language has not ever encountered with serious threat to its position and originality; as it is facing nowadays in the face of frequent usage of text messaging slangs in written English. Along with formal spellings of words, grammar rules, including capitalization and punctuations, have been forgotten because of extensive use of text messaging slangs and abbreviations. Language evolution has been a part of the study of linguistics for a long time; however it is only recently that technology has become such a prominent figure within the realm of written communication (Baron, 2008). (John Sutherland, 2002), texting is "bleak, bald, sad shorthand. Drab shrink talk ... Linguistically it's all pig's ear ... it masks dyslexia, poor spelling and mental laziness. Texting is penmanship for illiterates."

Those who text message tend to use or shortened word, abbreviation or single letter to represent an entire thought. Many texters alter just the grammatical words (such as "you" and "be"). Some texters use initial letters for whole words (n for "no", gf for "girlfriend", cmb "call me back"). Some of them use numerals, and symbols to represent words or parts of words, as with b "be" and 2 "to". No matter in what way the text is written ultimate purpose is to shorten writing and save more time. But ultimately it is resulting in the ruining of youths vocabulary. Youth is too much used to use text messaging slangs while communicating each other through texting that they forget the real terms. They mixed the real words of formal English with text messaging slangs.(Learmond Wayle, 2010) There is no doubt that texting has become the bane of English language. For a big part of population it is becoming a way of shortcutting or skipping roung words that should be written properly.In 2007 John Humphrys said in a newspaper article headed "I h8 txt msgs: How texting is wrecking our language", that texters are ruiners. They are destroying English through spoiling punctuation, savaging sentences and raping vocabulary.

Spelling represents another problem. Some people who text message rely on their phones to spell out the words. They may know the first few letters, but the phone does the rest. When these users are presented with the pencil and paper they have difficulty correctly spelling and may use the wrong word because it looks similar, or has the same first few words. Secondly people are used to of using abbreviations that while academic writing they totally forget the actual word and replace it with abbreviations like Aoa instead of assalam alaikum, xlnt instead of excellent.Shortened expressions lead to ambiguity in writing, no matter what the skills of the reader, some sentences without proper grammar can be interpreted multiple ways e.g.; lol can either be taken as lovely or laugh out loud. Hence, make it difficult for the reader to understand. In 2003 that a teenager had written an essay so full of text speak that her teacher was unable to understand it. An extract was posted online, and quoted incessantly, but no one was ever able to track down the entire essay. According to Lee (2002), teachers say that papers are being written with shortened words, improper capitalization and punctuation, and characters like &, $ and @." However, something that is not always considered is that these mistakes are often unintentional when students use IM frequently, they reach a saturation point where they no longer notice the IM lingo because they are so used to seeing it.Edutopia, an educational website conducted a poll regarding the issue of text messaging Does text messaging harm students writing skills?Almost 300 people voted, and the results were in favor of Yes, I believe students are carrying over the writing habits they pick up through text messaging into school assignments. Nearly half of the votes were yes while only about 30 percent were no. Also, about 20 percent voted that although texting may have some impact on how students write, its not a significant problem. Together, 70 percent of the votes casted agreed that texting does have some impact on students writing. Students who voted yes have probably used text messaging slangs in their school work or have seen it used. When students admit to using this text messaging slangs to complete homework assignments its obvious that it is a problem.1.7 DELIMITATIONS We have smaller sample of forty which cannot generalize the whole population. Topic was thought provoking needed more research which we cannot complete in the time period of three weeks.1.8 DATA COLLECTIONQuestionStrongly AgreeAgree

UncertainDisagreeStrongly Disagree

Do you use mobile for texting?2314030

How many text messages do you send daily?Less than 30Less than 50Less than 80Less than 100Less than 150

1. 1613632

Does text language have effect on your academic writing?1215184

Do you use text messages shortcuts while doing your academic work intentionally? 8126113

Do you use text messages shortcuts while doing your academic work unconsciously? 622642

Do you think text messages shortcuts are destroying students effectiveness in academic writing?1615531

Do you agree that SMS packages are the cause of destroying academic writing?814693

Does it irritate your teacher when you used text messages shortcuts?1216651

Does it affect your vocabulary?717394

Has your teacher pointed out your text messages shortcut mistakes in academic writing?396157

Does your teacher ever use chat room slangs on white board in the class room?11831810

Do you use shortcuts like this:

WordsAbbreviations

YouU302341

Take careTc206374

BecauseBcoz264343

Forever4evr1652107

NextNxt236164

Assalam alaikumAoa2032510

Is time saving a cause of text messages shortcuts?1316443

Is laziness one the causes of text messages shortcuts?812686

Question no. 1: Do you use mobile for texting?

Question no. 2: How many text messages do you send daily?

Question no. 3: Does text language have effect on your academic writing?

Question no. 4: Do you use text message shortcuts in your academic writing?

Question no. 5: Do you use text messages shortcuts while doing your academic work unconsciously?

Question no. 6: Do you think text messages shortcuts are destroying students effectiveness in academic writing?

Question no. 7: Do you agree that SMS packages are the cause of destroying academic writing?

Question no. 8: Does it irritate your teacher when you used text messages shortcuts?

Question no. 9: Does it affect your vocabulary?

Question no.10: Has your teacher pointed out your text messages shortcuts mistakes in academic writing?

Question no. 11: Does your teacher ever use chat room slangs on white board in the class room?

Question no. 12: Do you use shortcuts like this?

You: u

Take care: tc

Because: bcoz

Forever: 4ever

Next: nxt

Assalam alikum: Aoa

Question no. 13: Is time saving a cause of text messages shortcuts

Question no. 14: Is laziness one of the causes of text messages shortcuts?

1.9 DATA ANALYSISAccording to the results, shown in the above charts it is analyzed that most of the respondents (92%) believe that people use mobile for sending text messages of which 67% people believe that text language has affect on their academic writing. 50% people intentionally use text messages shortcuts in their academic writing and 15% are unaware of the fact that they do so or not while 65% people do this unconsciously.Majority of the respondents are of the view that text language has affect on their academic writing of which 77.5% people believe that are destroying students' effectiveness in academic writing. 55% people think that SMS packages are the cause of destroying youths academic writing.

When the respondents were asked about their teachers reaction of using text messages shortcuts in their academic writing 70% people said that it too irritates their teachers when they use such shortcuts in academic writing and their teachers frequently pointed their text messages shortcut mistakes. While some of the people7.5% were also of the view that their teachers also use such shortcuts on the whiteboard in the class room whereas 45% of respondents said that their teachers do not ever use them.

Despite of the above responses there is also a small portion (15%) who is unaware of the fact that weather their teachers ever use and pointed out such shortcut mistakes. Large portion of respondents (62%) think that time saving and laziness are the causes of using text message shortcuts. According to the results it is evident that weather people use text messages shortcuts intentionally or unconsciously in their academic writing but they do so and it has greatly influenced their academic writing and decreased their effectiveness in academic writing. The major causes of using text message shortcuts are time saving and laziness. Hence, it is evident that text messaging has largely affected the academic writing in youth. Text messaging has distracted their spelling, vocabulary and grammar.1.10 CONCLUSION The slang used in text messaging would not be a problem if they are only used for its intended purpose. Unfortunately it has become merged with formal English by many of its users. The popularity of text messaging, as a result, leads to losing of written languages position. People tend to use slangs and abbreviate words to shorten their writing and save more time in communicating. The outcome is that language in writing is not in its original fault. If this tendency continuous at a rapid pace, academic writing may be face up to a real problem about its stand. In conclusion we cannot deny the threat from texting to the status of academic writing because of their obvious popularity. Nevertheless, educators and individuals themselves, especially the youth should pay or attention to this matter so that we can take advantages of the new language along with preserving the traditional one.1.11 SUGGESTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The question is that who is to blame for students inability to properly write in formal English when it calls for it? Obviously, students are accountable for what they write on their assignments and other formal writing projects but it is the roll of teachers in the English language arts program to educate students on the correct use of formal and informal writing.REFERENCESJupiter media Corporation. (2008), Instant Messaging, Retrieved January 22 ,2012,http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/I/instant_messaging.htmlCrystal.D,(2008,July 5 ), Will Self and Lynn Truss on the joy and horrors of texting , The Guardian, Retrieved January 10,2012,

http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2008/jul/05/saturdayreviewsfeatres.guardianreview

http://www.essayforum.com/writing-feedback-3/writing-email-text-messaging-threats-written-language-6551/

Dean K. ,(2009), Text Messaging and Implications for its use in Education, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Retrieved January 15,2012, http://etec.hawaii.edu/proceedings/2009/Tomita.pdf

Friess . S, (2003, March 31), Yo, can u plz help me write English?, USA TODAY, Retrieved January 20, 2012, http://www.usatoday.com/life/2003-03-31-chat_x.htm

Goldstein,et al, ( March 2005 ), Speak Out: Does technology hurt student writing?, Retrieved January 18, 2012, http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa5369/is_200503/ai_n21369418/

OConnor, Amanda. (March 2005), Instant Messaging: Friend or Foe of Student Writing?, Retrieved January 23, 2012,