Upload
tranthu
View
220
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
TFAWSMSFC ∙ 2017
Presented By
Marc K. Smith
Acoustic Actuation of Vapor-Liquid
Interfaces in Boiling and
Condensation Processes
Thomas R. Boziuk, Marc K. Smith, and Ari Glezer
School of Mechanical Engineering
Georgia Institute of Technology
Atlanta, GA
Thermal & Fluids Analysis Workshop
TFAWS 2017
August 21-25, 2017
NASA Marshall Space Flight Center
Huntsville, AL
TFAWS Active Thermal Paper Session
Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory 2
Two-Phase Power Dissipation Applications
Server Farm
Insulated-Gate Bipolar Transistor
Radar
Electric Vehicle Drivetrains
Chemical / Process Engineering
Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory 3
Control of Phase Change Heat Transfer
Boiling heat transfer for high-power, dense
electronic systems
Heat transfer is limited by two primary
processes» Vapor formation and removal rates (critical heat flux)
» Condensation rate
Boiling and condensation present different
design challenges» Boiling: increase CHF, decrease surface superheat
» Condensation: enhance in bulk fluid for efficient
thermal packaging
Acoustic control of 2-phase boiling processes» At heater surface control of vapor growth, spreading,
and advection Surface force engendered by high-frequency
ultrasound
Used in conjunction with complex boiling geometries
» In bulk fluid control of condensation Acoustic actuation couples to surface Faraday waves
or via radiation pressure force and droplet ejection
Pool boiling and nozzle condensation geometries
Boiling
Condensation
1 mm
Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory 4
Acoustic Actuation of Liquid/Gas Interface
Interfacial coupling varies substantially with actuation wavelength
Ultrasonic [O(1 MHz)] liquid/gas interfacial actuation» Short actuation wavelength [O(1 mm)]
Exploits acoustic surface force to effect interfacial deformations and injection of a liquid jet and droplets
» lacoust = 0.9 mm; Dres = 2 mm; lcapillary = O(mm)
» Impedance mismatch Zvapor/Zwater=1.8x10-4
» High acoustic absorption coefficient aH2Ovapor 1,000 aH2Oliquid
» Amplitude = 6.82∙103 kPa peak-to-peak
» Forcing affects vapor bubbles larger than Dres
O(1 kHz) liquid/gas interfacial actuation» Long actuation wavelength [O(1 m)]
Much larger than the characteristic length scale of the vapor bubbles [O(5-10 mm)]
Forces capillary surface waves to enhance mixing of the interfacial thermal boundary layer
» lacoust = 1.5 m; Dres = 5.5 mm; lcapillary = O(mm) Significant disturbances
» Amplitude = 5 kPa peak-to-peak» Bjerknes body forces affect bubble’s path
Video Presented Here
Video Presented Here
Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory 5
15
2 m
m
Controlled bulk
temperature
Articulated acoustic
transducer
Variation of Critical Heat Flux with Bulk Temperature
Acoustically Controlled Boiling:
Experimental Setup
Heated surface design» Cartridge heater and thermocouples
» Exchangeable heater surfaces Plain
Plain, instrumented with surface-soldered
thermocouples
Microchannel grid
8 160 4 1260
100
140
180
CH
F(W
/cm
2)
Tsubcool(oC)
Distilled water
1 atm
93oC bulk temperature
Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory 6
0
100
200
10 20 30
q’’ (W/cm2)
Ts - Tsat (oC)
0 10050
8
4
q’’ (W/cm2)
DTs (oC)
Ultrasonic Control of Vapor at Surface
High-frequency acoustic actuation» Increases surface temperature (7 oC)
Detaches small scale vapor bubbles
Suppresses vaporization process at most nucleation sites
» Increases CHF by 65% Agreement with wire experiments of Isakoff (1956)
Surface Temperature
110
183
Vapor removal at surface
50 W/cm2
Video Presented Here
Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory 7
No ActuationAcoustic Actuation
(1.7 MHz)
1 mmq’’ = 100
W/cm2
0
100
10 20 30
q’’ (W/cm2)
Ts - Tsat (oC)
200
110
183190
Ultrasonic Control of the Boiling Curve
Video Presented Here Video Presented Here
Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory 8
Effect of Actuator Incidence Angle
DT (oC)
5
10
f
q
30 60 900
5
10
7
9
8
6
DT
f
DT as function of
Actuator Position
q’’base = 100 W/cm2, Tbase = 110oC, Tbulk = 93oC
Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory 9
microChannel Design: More than Surface Area
Dimpled
200400 1000
Smooth microChannels
0
200
400
10 20 30
q’’ (W/cm2)
Ts - Tsat (oC)10 20 30
Normalized by projected area Normalized by wetted area
CHF (W/cm2)
w/D0 0.1 0.3
100
200
300
(plain)
(400 mm)
(200 mm)
(1000 mm)
0.2
approx. same wetted area
Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory 10
0
250
500
10 20 30
Surface mChannels with Ultrasonic Actuation
mChannel Actuated (1.7 MHz)
100
200
300
110
350
183
1 mm
460
q’’
(W/c
m2)
Ts - Tsat (oC)
Smooth
Small-scale acoustic actuation within mChannels
» Decreases surface temperature (~ 7 oC).
» Increased power dissipation DP 200 W/cm2 at Ts - Tsat =17 oC
» Increases CHF by 31%
» Decreases surface temperature fluctuations.
» Increase CHF by 318% relative to smooth, unactuated case
200 W/cm2200 W/cm2300 W/cm2 300 W/cm2100 W/cm2 100 W/cm2
DT
s(o
C)
0
-5
5 Smooth
mChannel
100 200 300
q’’ (W/cm2)
400 mm
800 mm
10
00
mm
mChannel: actuated
mChannel:
unactuated
Smooth: unactuated Smooth: actuated
Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory 11
O(1 kHz) Acoustic Enhancement of Boiling
Marginal increase in CHF (16%)
Decrease in surface superheat of ~1 oC
Appearance of vapor is markedly different due to surface capillary waves
» Increased condensation has minimal effect on boiling process
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
20
40
60
80
100
q’’ (W/cm2)
Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory 12
Acoustic Control of Vapor Condensation
Pool boiling and condensers both
require enhanced condensation» Pool boiling used in heat sink applications
Vapor boils and condenses in close proximity
» Condensers used in power cycles Vapor is injected; boiling occurs in separate
boiler component
Nozzle geometry interacts with vapor
formation and acoustic enhancement
Condensation is limited by interface
area» Thermal boundary layer surrounds vapor
Boiling
Condensation
1 mm
Condensation
Nozzle Ejection
1 mm
Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory 13
Acoustically Controlled Condensation
Experimental Setup
Vacuum pump sets the
ambient pressure in test cell
Middle plate separates
boiling from condensation» Nozzle geometry can be
varied
» Bulk temperature of upper
tank controlled with coil heat
exchanger (not shown)
» Immersion heater creates
vapor in lower tank
Acoustic actuators:» 1 kHz, placed to sides of
nozzle
» 1.7 MHz, oriented either
above or to side of nozzle
Tank
steam reservoir
d
vacuum pump
nozzle
steam reservoir
nozzle
steam reservoir
nozzle
steam reservoir
10.8 cm
Distilled water
0.15 – 1 atm
Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory 14
nozzle
steam reservoir
Acoustically Enhanced Bubble Condensation
Low Frequency (1 kHz)
Actuated
25 oC subcool 225 W
Continuous Actuation (Atmospheric Pressure)
To: acoustic actuation period 1 msec
0 2 4 6 8 100
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1Volume (25 degrees subcool, kHz continuous)
V/V
o
t/To0
0
1
5 10
Increased thermal interfacial mixing leads to rapid collapse.
A∗ =Vapor Area
Average Baseline Vapor Area
0 200t/T0
1000
0.19
1Base Flow
Video Presented Here Video Presented Here
Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory 15
Boundary Layer Growth - kHz Condensation
Image processing of Schlieren images yields quantitative information on boundary layer growth
Thermal boundary layer in baseline flow does not undergo appreciable growth
» Heat transfer occurs primarily through lower (and subsequently, inner) interface
Acoustic actuation leads to nearly linear growth of boundary layer thickness
» No significant temporal dependence on acoustic actuation
Thermal boundary layer in presence of acoustic actuation is on average 6.7 times thicker
» Up to 17 times thicker
0 5 10
t/To (ms)
dt (mm)
0
1
2 All Instantaneous ThicknessAverage Instantaneous Thickness
dtdt
01-1
x (mm)0 1-1
x (mm)
0 10-10
x (mm)
20 0 10-10
x (mm)
20
{[I’(x
, y
i, t i)
]2}
{[I’(x
, y
i, t i)
]2}
I(x, y
i, t i)
2
4
0
2
4
0
80
160
dtdt
Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory 16
Natural Deformation-Induced Vapor Collapse
nozzle
steam reservoir
Surface tension pinch-off
drives a liquid “spear”
through the center of the
vapor bubble to form a vapor
torus that leads to rapid
condensation.
Schlieren imaging shows
insignificant thermal
gradients in fluid surrounding
bubble.» Inner “spear” enhances heat
transfer
This natural mechanism
indicates that inducing such
a liquid “spear” early in the
bubble formation process
can lead to accelerated
condensation.
Video Presented Here
Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory 17
Ultrasonic Liquid-Gas Interfacial Actuation
f = 1.7 MHz lacoust = 0.9 mm; Dres = 2 mm
lcapillary = O(mm)
» “Mist” droplets ejected, visible in video
Cavitation and subsequent collapse generates additional droplets
» Larger-scale; not uniformly sized
Acoustic impedance mismatch» Zvapor/Zwater=1.8x10-4
» Surface deforms from acoustic pressure
Deformed surface self-focuses acoustic intensity
1 cm
Video Presented Here
Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory 18
nozzle
steam reservoir
Condensation Enhancement: Pulsed Ultrasound
6 oC subcool
20 W
20 ms pulse
White LightSchlieren Imaging
Photo
transis
tor
Laser Diodeh
Pulsed actuation.» Saves power
» Minimizes interference with vapor ejection
» Vapor ejection pressure remains unchanged
Pulse actuation is synchronized to “natural” bubble
formation.» Bubble phase reference is obtained using a trigger laser
beam at given height above nozzle
» Actuation wavefronts are monitored using Schlieren imaging
trigger
Significant savings in actuation power
Video Presented Here
Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory 19
A*
t/Tb
Triggering laser diode
5 mm above nozzle
Q = 225 W
Tb = 50 ms
Subcooling = 25 oC
Axially-Aligned Pulsed Ultrasound Actuation
1
0.27
0 2 4
Base Vapor
Ultrasonic Vapor
nozzle
steam reservoir
High-speed video image processing yields
an estimate of total vapor domain as
function of time.» Subcooling and heater dissipation are
invariant, leading to the relation between
vapor domain and heat transfer coefficient.
𝑞𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 = 𝑈𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒,𝑒𝑓𝑓𝐴𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒,𝑒𝑓𝑓 𝑇𝑠𝑎𝑡 − 𝑇𝑠 =
𝑈𝐴𝑎𝑐𝑡,𝑒𝑓𝑓 𝑇𝑠𝑎𝑡 − 𝑇𝑠 = 𝑞𝑎𝑐𝑡
𝑦𝑖𝑒𝑙𝑑𝑠 𝑈𝑎𝑐𝑡,𝑒𝑓𝑓
𝑈𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒,𝑒𝑓𝑓=
𝐴𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒,𝑒𝑓𝑓
𝐴𝑎𝑐𝑡,𝑒𝑓𝑓
Vapor domain reduced by up to 73% using 20 ms actuation pulses.» HTC increased by 270%
Actuation “regularizes” time-periodic bubble formation.» The base flow a new bubble is ejected while the earlier bubble collapses
» In the presence of actuation, bubble collapse is completed prior to ejection of the
subsequent bubble
Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory 20
0 1t/Tb
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
1
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.4
1.2
0 1t/Tb
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
1
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.4
1.2
Bubble Volume Tracking
8 oC subcool
20 W
20 ms pulse
Tb = 80 ms
Y = 0.822 cc
Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory 210 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
0
40
80
0
2∙104
4∙104
U (W/m2K)
ሶq (W)
t/Tb
Temporal Variation:
Heat Transfer Coefficient and Heat Rate
Peak heat transfer
coefficient occurs
during toroidal breakup
in the absence and
presence of actuation. » Acoustic actuation leads
to near-immediate
doubling of HTC
Peak heat rate occurs
during pinch-off, torus
formation, and toroidal
breakup
Non-spherical effects» Lower peaks and higher
troughs
120
6∙104
Tactuation
Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory 22
High-resolution Schlieren imaging reveals formation of ultrasonically induced
droplet ejection from spear.
Required mass for complete phase change:
mdroplets = E/(cp∙DT) = [(Vo/vg)∙hfg]/(cp∙DT)
mdroplets per pulse: 0.0207 gram/pulse.» Can contribute up to 60% at low subcooling (8 oC), small bubbles or 45% at high
subcooling (25 oC), large bubbles
nozzle
steam reservoir
h
trigger
Interfacial Disturbances by
Secondary Droplet Ejection
Pulsed Ultrasound ActuationBase Flow
Video Presented Here Video Presented Here
Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory 23
Cylindrical Lens
Spherical Lens
Laser
Test SectionVorticity 1/s
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
Bubble extent inferred from
masked vectors along
centerline
x
y elevation for interpreting
wake after bubble collapse
y
Particle Image Velocimetry
Fluorescent Particles and optical filter to reduce laser reflections
Algorithmic masking to remove interface/ non-particle-laden flow
Post processing: 10,000 fps flow fields temporally averaged over 0.5 ms (5 frames)» Rightward of bubble is masked to remove interior and bubble shadow
8 oC subcool, 20 W, 20 ms pulse
Top View Side View
Optical Filter,
Camera
Cylindrical Lens
Spherical Lens
Laser
Test Section
Low-Power
Laser
trigger
Low-Power
Laser
Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory 24
Vorticity 1/s
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
Vorticity 1/s
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
Vorticity 1/s
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
0-2 2 0-2 2 0-2 2x/do
0
4
8 Vorticity 1/s
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
Vorticity 1/s
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
Vorticity 1/s
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
0-2 2 0-2 2 0-2 2x/do
0
4
8 Vorticity 1/s
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
Vorticity 1/s
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
Vorticity 1/s
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
Vorticity 1/s
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
0
4
8
0-2 2 0-2 2 0-2 2x/do
y/do
Naturally Condensing Vapor Bubbles
Vorticity Tb/s
1 Vt
Plotting
Threshold:
0.55 Vt
0Tb 0.25Tb 0.30Tb0.25Tb 0.56Tb 0.70Tb0.80Tb 0.85Tb 0.90Tb
Vt = 0.55, Tb = 80 msec, do = 2.3 mm
Vorticity Tb/s
1 Vt
Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory 25
y/do
Acoustically Actuated Vapor Bubbles
Vorticity Tb/s
1 VtVorticity 1/s
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
Vorticity 1/s
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
Vorticity 1/s
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
0-2 2 0-2 2 0-2 2x/do
0
4
8 Vorticity 1/s
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
Vorticity 1/s
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
Vorticity 1/s
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
0-2 2 0-2 2 0-2 2x/do
0
4
8 Vorticity 1/s
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
Vorticity 1/s
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
Vorticity 1/s
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
0
4
8
0-2 2 0-2 2 0-2 2x/do
Plotting
Threshold:
0.2 Vt
0Tb 0.05Tb 0.15Tb0.25Tb 0.30Tb 0.40Tb0.45Tb 0.50Tb 0.60Tb
Vt = 0.55, Tb = 80 ms, do = 2.3 mm
Vorticity Tb/s
1 Vt
Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory 26
Centerline Velocity
v/Vt
0 0.40.2 0.6 0.8 1
-2
2
t/Tb
-1
1
0
y/do
2
4
6
8
10
0
t/Tb
0 0.40.2 0.6 0.8 1
Tb = 80 ms, Vt = 0.55 m/s, do = 2.3 mm
Base Flow Actuated Flow
Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory 27
High-Subcooling, High-Mass Flow Rate Vapor
v/Vt
-2
2
1
-1
0
y/do
0
2
4
t/Tb
0 0.80.4 1.2 1.6t/Tb
0 0.80.4 1.2 1.6
Tb = 50 ms, Vt = 0.70 m/s, do = 5.3 mm
Base Flow Actuated Flow
Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory 28
Acoustic actuation is an effective method for
controlling two-phase flows with heat transfer.
» Interfacial coupling varies with actuation wavelength
Low frequency, O(1 kHz); long wavelength = 1 m
High frequency, O(1 MHz); short wavelength = O(1 mm)
» The acoustic coupling forces liquid-vapor interfacial motion
that affects vapor formation, advection, and condensation.
» Strongly enhances pool boiling heat transfer.
» Accelerates direct-contact vapor condensation.
General Conclusions
Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory 29
Conclusions: Boiling
Ultrasonic actuation (short wavelength).
» Couples to vapor bubbles by a surface force.
» Vapor bubble nucleation, growth, and detachment are
modified.
» CHF increases by 65%; surface temp. increases by 7 °C.
» Condensation increases above the boiling surface.
» Actuation may be turned on and off as needed without a
drop in performance.
Textured surfaces with ultrasonic actuation.
» Microchannels alone increase CHF to 350 W/cm2.
Ultrasound increases CHF to 460 W/cm2.
» Ultrasound reduces surface superheat by 7 °C (in contrast to
smooth heater).
Fluid Mechanics Research Laboratory 30
Conclusions: Condensation
O(1 kHz) acoustic actuation (long wavelength).» Interfacial Faraday waves increase condensation in the bulk liquid.
» Interface motion induces a temporally-growing thermal boundary
layer.
» Condensation rate is increased both during growth and after
advection, with increases of up to 425% in the time-averaged
overall heat transfer coefficient.
» Importance of motion in inducing mixing implies effectiveness
scales with surface displacement. Lower frequencies (1 kHz or below).
Prior work used either extremely low (50 Hz) or high (20 kHz)
frequencies, with smaller improvements in HTC.
Ultrasonic acoustic actuation (short wavelength).» Subcooled liquid jet protrudes into vapor bubble, significantly
increasing vapor surface area and heat transfer coefficient.
» Formation of toroidal volume leads to rapid bubble collapse.
» Pulsed actuation causes up to a 73% reduction in vapor extent.