Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Supplementary information
Synergetic strengthening of additively manufactured
(CoCrFeMnNi)99C1 high-entropy alloy by heterogeneous anisotropic
microstructure
Jeong Min Parka, Jungho Choeb, Hyung Keun Parka, Sujung Sona, Jaimyun Junga, Taek-Soo
Kimc, Ji-Hun Yub, Jung Gi Kimd, Hyoung Seop Kima *
aDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, POSTECH (Pohang University of Science
and Technology), Pohang 37673, Republic of KoreabPowder & Ceramic Division, Korea Institute of Materials Science (KIMS), Changwon 51508,
Republic of KoreacKorea-Russia Innovation Center, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology (KITECH), Incheon
22004, Republic of KoreadDepartment of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Gyeongsang National University,
Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea
*Corresponding author. Tel.: +82 54 279 2150; E-mail address: [email protected] (H.S.
Kim)
1
Supplementary figures
Figure S1. A schematic of the scanning strategy in the present SLM process. The
parallel and perpendicular directions of the laser-scanning path are denoted as X and Y
directions, respectively. The building direction is labeled as Z direction.
2
Figure S2. OM images on the finely polished surface of the samples processed by
different scanning speeds in SLM: (a) 100 mm/s, (b) 200 mm/s, (c) 400 mm/s, and (d)
600 mm/s. The volume fraction of pores is measured using 2D image-processing
program ‘Image J’. The sample built at 600 mm/s exhibits the minimum volume
fraction of pore (~ 0.14 vol%).
Figure S3. OM images for the etched surface of the SLM-processed HEAs with respect
to (a) X, (b) Y, and (c) Z planes.
3
Figure S4. The inverse pole figures (IPFs) of (a) X, (b) Y, and (c) Z planes of the
SLM-processed samples. The dotted contour lines overlayed on the IPFs represent the
level of Taylor factors.
Figure S5. The results of CMWP fitting on the XRD patterns of the as-built samples
oriented along (a) X, (b) Y and (a) Z directions: experimental (black solid line) and
fitted (red solid line) diffraction patterns and the difference (blue dotted line) between
experimental and fitted diffraction patterns. The experimental XRD patterns are well
matched with the CMWP fitted curves.
Figure S6. The simulated stress-strain curves for the samples deformed along (a) X, (b)
Y and (c) Z directions.
4
Figure S7. The Taylor factor maps (with respect to tensile direction) overlaid on IQ
maps at the regions of the local strains of (a) ~30.15%, (b) ~36.38%, and (c) ~32.30% in
the samples deformed along X, Y, and Z directions, respectively. Deformation twin
bundles are highlighted by yellow arrows in the EBSD maps. It is noted that the
deformation twins are mainly found in the grains having large grain size and high
Taylor factor.
5