3
Transparency in government procurements  National income of any country comprise s consumpt ion and investment expenditure, net exports and last, but not the least, government spendings. Government spendings are a special type of expediture, which are incurred, along with other things, to look af te r the we lf ar e of it s popula ti on. Dif fe rent ti ers of gove rnme nt, cent ral, reg ion al/ pr ovincial and loc al, on avera ge spe nd 10 – 20 per cen t of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) on the procurement of goods and services. It is a significant share of national public finance . Accordi ng to an estimate, at the global level, non- def enc e related pro cur ement amoun ts to an est imate d US$1. 5 tr ill ion . Among developing countries, government procurement is estimated to account for 9 - 13  percent of GDP. This sizable magnit ude of governmen t procurement speaks volumes about it s import ance for the impl ementa ti on of development poli cy and it s repurcussions at national level. Every nation has developed some procedures to procure goods and services for public  purposes. If these procedures are fair, clear, and transparent, they increase efficien cy  because opacity of such procedure s results in corruption. Transpare ncy in these rules and regulations restricts opportunities of rent seeking by few at the helm of affairs and  blocks any moves of nepotism. Clearly defined procedures of public procurement give way to fair allocation of resources and save public resources from being wasted and lead to good governance, which has become a buzzword, though in positive sense.  Not only the national private sector provides goods and services to government, but also the companies operating at international level also engage in provisioning of such goods and services. Someti mes, the lucrative volumes of governme nt procurement in any country attract foreign investmen t. These investmen ts help produce goods and services, filling the national savings gap and become sources of revenue in the form of tax es, fees and oth er pay me nts. The eff ecti ve use of suc h reven ues , spe nt transparently potentially, lead to successful growth and poverty reduction. It is observed that the state and other institutions managing these resources are not accountable to the ordinary citizens and their control over resources lures them to embezzle these funds and engage in corrupt practices. There are example of countrie s where all the procedures in place to use public funds effective, yet they lack the will to implement these rules and regulations. Since majority of resources are siphoned off, such countries tend to perform poorly in terms of economic development and other governance indicators.

TGP Blog 2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: TGP Blog 2

8/3/2019 TGP Blog 2

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/tgp-blog-2 1/3

Transparency in government procurements

 National income of any country comprises consumption and investment expenditure,net exports and last, but not the least, government spendings. Government spendingsare a special type of expediture, which are incurred, along with other things, to look 

after the welfare of its population. Different tiers of government, central,regional/provincial and local, on average spend 10 – 20 percent of the GrossDomestic Product (GDP) on the procurement of goods and services. It is a significantshare of national public finance. According to an estimate, at the global level, non-defence related procurement amounts to an estimated US$1.5 trillion. Amongdeveloping countries, government procurement is estimated to account for 9 - 13

 percent of GDP. This sizable magnitude of government procurement speaks volumesabout its importance for the implementation of development policy and itsrepurcussions at national level.

Every nation has developed some procedures to procure goods and services for public

 purposes. If these procedures are fair, clear, and transparent, they increase efficiency because opacity of such procedures results in corruption. Transparency in these rulesand regulations restricts opportunities of rent seeking by few at the helm of affairs and

 blocks any moves of nepotism. Clearly defined procedures of public procurementgive way to fair allocation of resources and save public resources from being wastedand lead to good governance, which has become a buzzword, though in positivesense.

 Not only the national private sector provides goods and services to government, butalso the companies operating at international level also engage in provisioning of such

goods and services. Sometimes, the lucrative volumes of government procurement inany country attract foreign investment. These investments help produce goods andservices, filling the national savings gap and become sources of revenue in the formof taxes, fees and other payments. The effective use of such revenues, spenttransparently potentially, lead to successful growth and poverty reduction.

It is observed that the state and other institutions managing these resources are notaccountable to the ordinary citizens and their control over resources lures them toembezzle these funds and engage in corrupt practices. There are example of countrieswhere all the procedures in place to use public funds effective, yet they lack the willto implement these rules and regulations. Since majority of resources are siphoned

off, such countries tend to perform poorly in terms of economic development andother governance indicators.

Page 2: TGP Blog 2

8/3/2019 TGP Blog 2

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/tgp-blog-2 2/3

The issue of transparency in government procurements is also veryimportant with reference to market access in the jargon of international tradenegotiation under the auspices of the World Trade Organization(WTO). Transparency in government procurements is one of the four Singapore Issues. The others include trade facilitaion, trade and investmentand competition policy. These are called Singapore Issues because theseissues were introduced in the WTO during the Singapore MinisterialMeeting in 1996 and four working groups were formed and were given theresponsibility to discuss these issues and recommend whether to bring theseissues for negotiations at the WTO. 

Since public funds are misappropriated through corruption, United Nationshas included corruption as one of the ten points in its Global Compact. TheUnited Nations Global Compact (UNGC) is a strategic policy initiative for 

 businesses that are committed to aligning their operation and strategies withten universally accepted priciples in the areas of human rights, labour,

Page 3: TGP Blog 2

8/3/2019 TGP Blog 2

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/tgp-blog-2 3/3

environment and anti corruption. Apart from the interest of multinational companies, The United Nations and thedeveloped countries at the WTO, transparency, in not only government procurement,

 but in every walk of life at the national level should be an imperative for the people

and their representatives. Corrupt practices are not a specific phenomenon of developing countries and it would be naïve to believe that there are no corrupt

 practices in the governments in the developed countries. Yet, allegedly this problemis more acute in developing countries, which is reflected by their poor performance ineconomic and social indicators. So the message for anyone who is involved or is atthe verge of entering public life is to give a top priority to transparency.

Choi, I. 1999. ‘Long and Winding Road to the Government Procurement Agreement:

Korea’s Accession Experience’. Paper presented at the World Bank and PacificEconomic Cooperation Council Trade Policy Forum, Manila, 19–20 July

Hoekman, B. 1998. ‘Using International Institutions to Improve Public Procurement’.World Bank Research Observer 13 (2): 249–69.

Labels: Corruption, government procurement, Transparency, UNGC