The 10 Fastest Ways to Learn Cubase

8/3/2019 The 10 Fastest Ways to Learn Cubase

1/13

Articles Recording Equipment The 10 Fastest Ways To Learn Cubase

Are you having a hard time learning Steinberg's Cubase?

This article wi ll help you speed through the learning curve.

I often get

emails that

ask the best

/ fastest way

to learn

Cubase.

I'm not sure

if it's my

technical

nature or

just luck, but

I didn't find

Cubase to be

nearly as

complex as

many people

claim. While

I can't say

whether

Cubase isright for you,

I can give

you a few

pointers to save you some grief.

The 10 Fastest Ways To LearnCubase

New To Audio Recording? Download Killer Home Recording: Setting Up FOR FREE!

The 10 Fastest Ways To Learn CubaseThis is an article on The 10 Fastest Ways To Learn Cubase part of the Home Recording Forum community: Are you having a hardtime learning Steinberg's Cubase? This article will help you speed through the learning curve. I .

Remember Me?

User Name Password Log in RegisterHelp

Forum Blogs Contact Products Tools Advertise

What's New?Making Home Recordings Pro RecordingsAdvanced Search

Welcome to RecordingReview.com

If you would like to.....

Make better recordings NOW

Get help buying the best gear for your needs

Solve technical problems

Be part of an annoying community

...then you have come to the right place!

You'll have more fun recording immediate ly.

YES! I want to register an account for free

p.s.: For registered members has minimal ads.

by

Published on 11-08-2011

11:08 AM Number of Views:

3614

22 Comments

brandondrury Rate this article

Home Join

10 Fastest Ways To Learn Cubase http://forum.recordingreview.com/content/10-fastest-ways-learn-cubase...

13 23.11.2011 19:06


2/13

#1 Watch Killing With Cubase series.I've put together twenty or so videos that cover what I

consider to be the crucial elements of Cubase. They are

highly informal. I screw up the names of various Cubase

windows. I ramble a bit. However, I also give you my

hardcore opinion on exactly what works in Cubase for me.

#2 Use The Getting Started PDF Included

With CubaseCubase comes with a PDF for getting started. It's going toknock out all your basic day-to-day stuff. I'd say that 95%

of the functionality you need for your next session is

covered here. The people that struggle for three months

with Cubase seem all fall under the Ignored-Getting-

Started-PDF category.

#3 Outside GuidesWhen I jumped into Cubase SX3 back in 2005, I bought a

set of instructional videos on Ebay. They were long,

boring, and hard to watch. I forced myself to use them,

but ultimately I don't remember much from the videos.

Really, they were more of a demonstration of what is

capable....kinda like Eddie Van Halen playing through aguitar emulator plugin. Yeah, that's one way of doing it. I

got a feeling I'm doing to end up with something different.

I would place the video instruction I purchased in the

Attempting To Be Thorough Class. It was trying to cover

everything. Learning the possibilities is great.....maybe

even required. Attempting total mastery of ALL functions

is completely unnecessary, impractical, and inefficient.

That's like test driving EVERY woman on Earth before you

buy one.

The other style of video I've encountered is what I'm

putting in the Rehashed Basics Class. These are often

much more personable ways of learning the same stuff

covered in the included Cubase guide. These videos are

generally pleasant to watch. They often have some

personal anecdotes that are insanely helpful. The not

comprehensive nature of these videos makes them better

as you actually get someone with an opinion. A little bias

is good if the person as a similar workflow to what you

want to do.

A downside to these more personal videos is there are

often details missing that the manual wouldn't miss. I

personally use Cubase each and every day and make a

living with it, but there are many little details that I don't

know. I screw up all the time when teaching Cubase, but

all these deta ils are so miniscule that they don't affect my

results.

My advice is to save your money and use a blend of video

tutorials and the Cubase Getting Started PDF that comes

bundled with every copy of Cubase.

#4 It IS LearningSome people mistake learning recording software with

something fun. It's not.. It's much like on a lazy day when

the remote is 6 away. You've got to muster up the

strength and find the will to actually get your butt off the

couch.

I recommend setting your alarm clock, getting up a bit

early, and just plan on a hard day of work.

If you approach this as pain-in-the ass job that you have

to simply bust through with effort, you'll be surprised how

quickly you get it done. I don't see an alternative.

Wave Arts AudioPluginsGreat plug-ins formixing, mastering,and audio restorationwww.wavearts.com

Music Production

Diplomasound engineering,production, musicbusiness, mixing,masteringwww.londonschoolofsound.c

Learn Pro Tools

OnlineOnline Pro Toolscourses from BerkleeCollege of Musicwww.berkleemusic.com

8Dio VirtualInstrumentsEpic Choirs, Guitars &PercussionProfessional NIKontakt VSTs8dio.com

studio.M Free

Music AppSongwriting & MusicProduction App4-tracks, mixing,loops & effects!www.soundtrends.com


13 23.11.2011 19:06


3/13

#5 Cubase Is OverbuiltCubase is kinda li ke a real army hummer. It has a winch, a

rocket launcher, multiple spare tires, bullet-proof glass, a

flare gun, and two dozen other items that could be fun on

a boring Saturday. With that said, I drove 10 hours

yesterday, saw probably 50 military hummers on the

highway, and not one of them was shooting at insurgents.

They were using the same features as I was in my Civic.

For my task, I simply had to hold a hold down a gas pedal

and use the steering wheel to get back on center after

grazing the concrete side rails in between naps. Simpleenough....until I need my rocket launcher. Cubase is the

same. If you don't need the rocket launcher, don't bother

fiddling with it until you are ready.

#6 Learn The ShortcutsI know some people that complain that they mix up the

hardcore features with the day-to-day stuff. I don't have

this problem at a ll. I think a major reason for this is I

made a point to learn the shortcuts early. In particular, I'm

talking about the number key row above the letters. When

you get these down, you can work extremely fast in

Cubase without an ounce of thought. The helicopter tool

throws people off. You can see my Killing With Cubase

video tutorial on this one. You won't figure that one out byust tinkering, most likely.

#7 Use Custom ShortcutsSetting up custom shortcuts in Cubase takes 2 seconds

once you understand it...which takes 2 minutes, maybe.

Note: For this sort of thing, see your real-deal manual.

When you find that you use something constantly, go

ahead and assign it an unused keystroke or just override

something you don't use. It's rather impressive what you

can call up via shortcuts.

This is where things get interesting. Steinberg makes

Cubase to be a dangerous weapon for everyone doing hip

hop remixing to death meta l to folk music. Your way ofworking will be different than mine. If you find you are

being slowed down somewhere, speed it up. Create a

shortcut for it.

#8 You Can't Try CubaseQuite a few people are using X and decide they want to

try Cubase. That's impossible. You either use it or you

don't. Breaking off a little piece of Cubase and taking a

bite is kinda like flying with just a rudder and a landing

gear. Dive in all the way and DO IT or don't.

#9 Why Switch?This is the big one. If you are already using X (Pro Tools,

Logic, Sonar, Reaper, Digital Performer, etc....stuff I

consider to be Real Deal Software) and decide you want

to USE Cubase (not try it), you should probably make a

quick list of how you are limited. I have a hard time

believing that any of these programs are remotely

limiting. Cheaper stuff may be. Not sure.

I knew back in the day when I was using Sonic Foundry

Vegas (back before Sony bought it and before it had any

real video capabilities) I realized that there were many

things I was missing out just on just by talking to people.

The big one for me was an advanced MIDI Sequencer. The

other was the dramatically faster editing within Cubase.

Use The Cubase ForumEven though I'm pretty freakin' handy with Cubase in a

session (a zil lion hours of anything will do that to you), I

don't know much about it. Kinda like how humans know

extremely little about what's really under the ocean,


13 23.11.2011 19:06


4/13

there's a whole bunch of Cubase stuff that I'm rather

clueless on, too.

While I'm POSITIVE that there are e lements of Cubase

that would make my life easier, I don't make much time to

get serious with learning them. I have mixing deadlines

and articles that need to go up Tuesday morning.

When there is a feature that I suspect Cubase has and

using it would save me more time than doing the task

manually, I check Google or the big manual. It's shockinghow often Cubase has it taken care of. Every once in a

blue moon I like to do a lit tle homework and understand a

new feature just to see what it can do for me. Otherwise,

it's back to work.

Deciding when to invest time into searching and learning

a better, faster method is tricky. It's sometimes easy to

spend two hours and not come up with a better method

than you have now. Other times you find a 30 second tip

that saves you six hours of work that day and any other

day you need to handle the task.

Music DownloadsLogin to listen. Join! It's Free!

Categories: Recording SoftwareTags: getting started, killing with cubase, steinberg cubase

22 Comments

Share

wyatt, rolando14, frankymusik and 5 others like this.

dudermn - 11-08-2011, 06:40 PM

If cubase is like a hummy, acid must be

like an abrams Tank . Think about it,

we have the ability to zoom in just by

dragging the scroll wheel, just like how a

tank would move it's turrent and use i t's

camera about. Both can use the sametools, and both can run over clay-mores

and what not, but acid backs things up

every time you move the cursor, if you

want. So a tank has more security than a

hummy. Of course the hummy will get

you there faster, but tank technology is

catching up, and a tank can go through

more terrain (can't wait to see what acid

8 will do, maybe it'll be voice activated).

Cubase might be more customizable, just

like a hummy, but acid is like a tank,

where you sit in your driver position and

only a few things are customizable. Yes

yes yes, I could go on for days...... In theend if you want to learn cubase first you

gotta get your head around how it works,

I still remember the first time I got into

it. I couldn't even record something, it

Reply


13 23.11.2011 19:06


5/13

must've took me a whole week to figure

it out. So ya patience is import. Then in

cubase there's also the whole file

management system which, is unknown

to me. But yea, I'm a tank person. Cool

article.

Dee-Funked - 11-08-2011, 08:34 PM

I'm with Brandon, I've always been drawn

to Cubase because it seemed to workintuitively, have everything (and more)

you'll ever need and the further I get into

it, the more I find things that make me

go, "Woah! I've wished my DAW could do

that for ages... now I know it does!" That

said, with the immense lists and varieties

of functions (setting up midi control for

the editing/arrangement window was the

most fun so far) the included

documentation really is your best friend...

a quick fiund search in the .pdf and your

usually where you need to be in the

comprehensive operation manual. It also

has a very impressive output/monitor mixcapability, providing your interface

supports multiple outs from the computer.

Nad above all I think I just like the

aesthetic and feel: it's German, precise,

concise, understated and focussed on

funtionality.

Reply

Prado Escondido - 11-08-2011, 11:35 PM

I've had a different experience with the

videos. I thought the ones from AskVideo

were fantastic. Sure you don't remember

everything ... but you get an overview of

all the features and then when you wantto do something and you're not sure how,

you suddenly remember ... "Oh! that's on

the video." Then you have the reference,

right there. I love Cubase. I'm always

finding deeper things ... like using the

'Input transformer' to limit what i s coming

in on a midi track or how friggin' easy it i s

to sequence hardware and record it in

real time on a track in Cubase. Internal

summing ... using 'dummy' output busses

... to record your VSTi tracks in real time

to audio without having to render is

amazing. Most of all I love the midi

functionality. I always steer anyonestarting out towards Reaper ... but once

you've got the time and money sunk in

Cubase, I don't think you every would

want to go back. I al so own Reaper, Acid

Pro 6 and Ableton 6 ... and they most ly

gather digital dust ... although I'm not

above rewiring Acid from time to time

when I want to use it's great pitch and

tempo stretching. Were money no object,

I'd also get ProTools as I think it has

some mixing capabilities beyond anything

else ... the ability to set up multiple fader

groups so you can adjust different groups

of channels together once you have their

relative levels with one another set ...and then there's Transfuser! The Cubase

Forum has some absolute gurus who love

to help and have amazingly deep Cubase

knowledge. There is one guy called

Reply


13 23.11.2011 19:06


6/13

'Vic_France.' who every time I see his

name in a thread I read his post ... and 9

times out of 10 learn something new.

Prado

Equilibrium8 - 11-09-2011, 04:35 AM

"That's like test driving EVERY woman on

Earth before you buy one. " I'm failing to

see how this is unnecessary. Except that

I'd have no time to learn to use Cubase.

Reply

Electriclight - 11-09-2011, 08:39 AM

Yeah, I use Acid for a few tasks and it

feels as agile as a Abrahms tank. Some ofthe most elementary things, like starting

and stopping playback, seems

unnecesarily complex or unintuitive. I can

right click in Cubase and it performs

common tasks the same as MS Word or

Excel. I dont' have to think about what I

am doing. When I'm in Acid I have to

concentrate on everything but the music.

I'm sure it's just lack of experience - but

that being said, it amazes me that people

can shift between 15 di fferent programs

without going nuts.

Originally Posted bydudermn

If cubase is like a hummy,

acid must be like an abrams

Tank .

Reply

screamindave - 11-09-2011, 10:28 PM

I 1st got started with Cubase LE, jumped

straight into Cubase Studio 4, upgraded

to Cubase 5 64 bit, and now I'm waiting

for Cubase 6 to get delivered. I

absolutely love this platform and couldn't

imagine using anything else. The more I

use it, the more I learn about it's

capabilities and I'm far from mastering it.

Kudos to Steinberg!

Reply

famouspatrick- 11-10-2011, 12:17 AM

I'm a Sonar user, and I found that a ll ofthe advice in this article works for Sonar

as well. There is a getting started PDF,

there are a couple of good video tutorial

series, and a freaking gazillion page

manual on PDF that is searchable.

Everything from #4 on is applicable to

every major DAW, and I agree with every

one. Great advice!

Reply

brandondrury - 11-10-2011, 01:49 PMReply


13 23.11.2011 19:06


7/13

Just curious. Can't Cubase do this by

linking channels or are you talking about

something more fancy?

You may think it's necessary to try out

every woman on Earth. We'll say each

woman can be tried in 3 weeks. My super

quick math says it would take

200,000,000 years to do it.

Most likely. I'd guess that all programs

feel natural once you use them

enough.Then again, I find video editing in

Premiere to be TOTALLY cumbersome.

I've taken many hours to look and find a

way to find shortcuts and such so I don't

have to perform 3-4 tasks to get to the

spot I want to be and such. These

shortcuts for speedy workflow just don't

seem to be there.So maybe some

programs just are slow and force you to

use to much of the brain. Not sure.

Agreed! Maybe it's because I'm multi-

tasking to the max now, but if I had to

learn one more damn program, it had

better do something breathtaking.

Great point. I think this is going to be the

case with any good software. The

differences between the top stuff now are

so slight that it's not even that

the ability to set up

multiple fader groups so

you can adjust d ifferent

groups of channels together

once you have their relative

levels with one another set

"That's like test driving

EVERY woman on Earth

before you buy one. " I'm

failing to see how this is

unnecessary.

When I'm in Acid I have toconcentrate on everything

but the music. I'm sure it's

just lack of experience

it amazes me that people

can shift between 15

different programs without

going nuts.

I'm a Sonar user, and Ifound that all of the advice

in this article works for

Sonar as well. There is a

getting started PDF, there

are a couple of good video

tutorial series, and a

freaking gazillion page

manual on PDF that is

searchable. Everything from

#4 on is applicable to every

major DAW, and I agree

with every one. Great

advice!


13 23.11.2011 19:06


8/13

interesting to discuss it,

anymore.Brandon

screamindave - 11-10-2011, 08:37 PM

Yes - linking multiple channels is a key

feature of Cubase.

Originally Posted bybrandondrury

Just curious. Can't Cubase

do this by linking channels

or are you talking aboutsomething more

fancy?Brandon

Reply

BenJaMan - 11-11-2011, 01:11 AM

yes, you can "link" channels in cubase .

but then you have to un-link if you want

to make any change to relative volumes

then remember to re-link them . possible,

but probably the long way around .much

more usable / time-friendly >> hit F4,

create bus (3 seconds) then set desired

channel outputs to that bus . now you

have a fader to control the group . as a

powerful extention, you can even bus

busses !

Originally Posted by PradoEscondido

... the ability to set up

multiple fader groups so

you can adjust d ifferent

groups of channels together

once you have their relative

levels with one another set

...

Originally Posted byscreamindave

Yes - linking multiple

channels is a key feature of

Cubase.

Reply

brandondrury - 11-11-2011, 06:39 PM

That's what I always do if I need to

manipulate a bunch of tracks. I rarely

have less than 15 buses in a mix.I was

under the impression that someone in

Pro Tools found a magic, exclusive

feature.Brandon

hit F4, create bus (3

seconds) then set desired

channel outputs to that bus

. now you have a fader to

control the group .

Reply


Right, you can group multiple faders ...

Reply


13 23.11.2011 19:06


9/13

but what i said was "multiple fader

groups." You can link as many faders as

you like in Cubase, but only in one group

at a time. In PT you can have multiple

groups of faders.For example, link all the

drum tracks coming into your drum buss

after you have set the individual track

levels. Do the same for other groups of

say, guitars. Now you can change the

track levels coming into the buss for each

group for mixing while keeping thebalance of the tracks the same.There are

situations where easily reseting the

levels of tracks within the buss is better

than simply adusting the output levels of

the buss. Think about sends. Post fader

sends levels from the individual tracks

will get changed in the mix ... increased

or decreased ... when you use the buss

level to change the group in the mix. But

if you have the track faders 'ganged' in

the buss, the relative send level of each

track can be maintained.AFAIK, this is an

exclusive feature of PTPrado

brandondrury - 11-16-2011, 01:28 AM

I see. Thanks for the explanation. On my

more complex mixes I do find this to be a

bit of a pain. When I've got a vocal track

flowing into a chorus_vocal bus into a

vocal bus it can get maddening trying to

track back where I used the send.

Of course, in these cases, I find that

simpler is better 99% of the time and I

just undo all that dumb processing I did

previously.

Brandon

Reply

LRM - 11-16-2011, 01:43 AM

I'm not sure I get you...

Do you essentially mean linking a single

fader - or multiple faders - into multiple

fader groups and each fader group has

exclusive control over that fader - or

faders?

Or do you mean as you first state it,

having multiple groups of linked faders?

As to the latter, you are not limited tohaving just one group (at least not with

Cubase 6), you can have multiple sets of

different faders independently linked. But

you can't link one fader or set of faders

more than once.

To me though, for the most part linking

tracks is a limi ted function better done

through group tracks or additional buses

in Cubase. You can assign a

track/group/bus output to a group track

or bus or use a sends to up to 8 different

group tracks or buses - pre as well as

post fader.

Reply


Originally Posted by LRM

Reply


13 23.11.2011 19:06


10/13

Yes, an individual track can belong to

more than one group at the same time.

So you can, for example, have a group for

snare top and snare bottom but also havea larger group containing those snares

and all other drum tracks. Additionally

you can have your sends linked for the

group, so if you use send 2 on al l tracks

to send to a plate, those individual track

amounts can be adjusted within the

group and retain their relative levels.

Finally, you can create VCA mix t racks

which provide a virtual fader that moves

all the track levels in the group.

See this video: Pro Tools 9 - Creating and

Using Edit & Mix Groups - Mac OS X &

Win 7 - YouTube

Note how the group membership info and

whether the group is active or not is

clearly displayed in the track itself in the

mixer. Notice how many more colors you

can use to create easy visualization of

groups beyond Cubase's 16 tracks.

I love Cubase, but there is no question

that Pro Tools is the superior platform for

mixing.

Prado

I'm not sure I get you...

Do you essentially mean

linking a single fader - or

multiple faders - into

multiple fader groups and

each fader group has

exclusive control over that

fader - or faders?

Or do you mean as you first

state it, having multiplegroups of linked faders?

As to the latter, you are not

limited to having just one

group (at least not with

Cubase 6), you can have

multiple sets of different

faders independently

linked. But you can't link

one fader or set of faders

more than once.

To me though, for the most

part linking tracks is a

limited function better done

through group tracks or

additional buses in Cubase.

You can assign a

track/group/bus output to a

group track or bus or use a

sends to up to 8 different

group tracks or buses - pre

as wel l as post fader.

brandondrury - 11-16-2011, 01:26 PM

I love Cubase, but there is

no question that Pro Tools

Reply


di 13 23.11.2011 19:06


11/13

Interesting. I'm not sold yet. What else

does Pro Tools do better?

The only difference I see in what Pro

Tools does is the way the sends are

handled. I'm guessing this would save me

10 seconds of time on a 5 hour mix and it

won't sound any better. If I understandyou correctly, we are talking the different

between Pro Tools getting 999 out of

1,000 and Cubase getting 997 out of

1,000.

Interesting. I always wondered why

people wanted 16. I do pretty well with 5

or 6.

is the superior platform for

mixing.

Notice how many more

colors you can use to create

easy visualization of groups

beyond Cubase's 16 tracks.

LRM - 11-16-2011, 02:05 PM

Originally Posted by PradoEscondido

Yes, an individual track can

belong to more than one

group at the same time. So

you can, for example, have

a group for snare top and

snare bottom but also have

a larger group containingthose snares and all other

drum tracks. Additionally

you can have your sends

linked for the group, so if

you use send 2 on all tracks

to send to a plate, those

individual track amounts

can be adjusted within the

group and retain their

relative levels. Final ly, you

can create VCA mix tracks

which provide a virtual

fader that moves all the

track levels in the group.

See this video: Pro Tools 9 -

Creating and Using Edit &

Mix Groups - Mac OS X &

Win 7 - YouTube

Note how the group

membership info and

whether the group is active

or not is clearly displayed in

the track itse lf in the mixer.

Notice how many more

colors you can use to create

easy visualization of groups

beyond Cubase's 16 tracks.

I love Cubase, but there is

no question that Pro Tools

is the superior platform for

Reply


i 13 23.11.2011 19:06


12/13

So I watched the video and got it now. To

a certain degree, it's looks more like it

encompasses track linking, groups, folder

tracks and send buses while staying

within a track linking view and literally

controlling the track faders with a group.I can see some advantage to it in certain

cases but my method of chaining groups

and folders and buses gets me "almost"

all of the same functionality within less

space and less faders... even if it might

be costing me more brain cell fry

stepping forwards and backwards through

the chains than the way PT9 allows you

to do it.

hmm...If this is new to PT9, I'm

wondering though if Cubase 6 doesn't

have the missing functionality stashed

away somewhere that I haven't looked

into yet. Probably not but now I'm going

have to go look tonight anyhow.

mixing.

Prado


It all boils down to a couple of things ...

once we are agreed that it is better to

adjust levels inside the buss as opposed

to with the buss fader.Cubase channels

can be linked or unlinked. Channels can

only belong to one group. There is no

way to acitvate or deactivate a group:

unlink it and it is gone. There is no

visualization of what is linked or what itis linked to: you don't know until you

select one of the channels and they all

highlight. There is no 'master fader' for

the linked groups, i.e., VCA channels,

which can be automated.Pro Tools does

all the above. IMO these are powerful

and efficient mixing tools. If when you

see and understand from the video what

they do and you then see no use or

advantage for your work flow, then you

will be satisfied without them.I have and

use Cubase 6, but wish it also contained

similar tools.This lenghty digression

arose because I stated I wished Cubase

had faders groups like Pro Tools, you

asked the question ' ... something more

fancy?' and someone replied Cubase can

do the same thing.I think it is clear to all

now that what Cubase can do is not the

not the same thing.I think everyone

would agree that what Pro Tools does

with this is better, but how much better

or how much more useful is another

question.For recording and mixing bands,

maybe not so much. For dance music or

post production, maybe a lot.BTW, this

thread has gotten me around to making a

feature request on the Cubase

forum.Anyway, peace to all. Prdo

Reply

Prado Escondido - 11-16-2011, 02:19 PMReply


di 13 23.11.2011 19:06


13/13

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:02 PM.

Home Recording Forum by vBulletin Version 4.1.7

Copyright 2011 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0

I think since PT 7. But I'm not sure.Prado

hmm...If this is new to PT9,

I'm wondering though if

Cubase 6 doesn't have the

missing functionality

stashed away somewhere

that I haven't looked into

yet. Probably not but now

I'm going have to go look

tonight anyhow.

LRM - 11-16-2011, 02:30 PM

Don't get me wrong, I'm not denying the

functionality being useful and for some

things (maybe a lot) even better and

beyond Cubase's functionality - and if I

ahd the chance I'd probably play with it

to see how it would suit how I do things.

hehe - all this also reminds me of the

back and forth that went on over MIDI

Tracks vs. Instrument Tracks.

If it's been that long and not a pointed

out feature of Cubase,I can't see it be ing

hidden in there somewhere. oh well...

I think since PT 7. But I'm

not sure

Reply

Page 1 of 2 1 2 Last

-Home -Recording Forum -Music Recording Blog -Blog Archive Contact Us -Affiliate ProgramHome Recording Blogs Archive -Audio Interface -Electric Guitar Recording -Recording Studios -Killer Home Recording

-Privacy

Policy Sitemap


Documents

The 10 Fastest Ways to Learn Cubase