Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The 2006 Elite Canadian Directors Continue to Drive Governance Improvement
1Authors:Professor Tim Rowley with David Comrie
In 2004, CC(BE)2 discovered a cluster of 16 directors each of whom sat on 5 or more S&P/TSX Composite Index boards…we called them the “Elite 16”
Directors Number of Boards Companies
MacNeill, Brian F. 7 DFS, PCA, SCC, T, TD, WFT, WTO
Cockwell, Jack L. 6 ACM.NV.A, BPO, FL, FPS, NRD, NBD
Mazankowski, Rt. Hon. D.F. 6 ACO.NV.X, GWO, IGM, POW.SV, PWF
McKenna, Hon. F.J. 6 BMO, CGS, FNX, NRD, SC, ZEN
O’Brien, David P. 6 ECA, FHR, N, MOL.A, RY, TA
2
O’Brien, David P. 6 ECA, FHR, N, MOL.A, RY, TA
Baillie, A. Charles 5 BLD, CNR, WN, IQW, T
Bérard, André 5 BCE, BBD.SV.B, NRD, SAP, VAS
Cleghorn, John E. 5 CP, FTT, MOL.A, NT, SNC
Fortier, L. Yves 5 AL, HBC, NT, NCX, RY
Godsoe, Peter C. 5 ABX, FHR, OCX.SV, RCI.NV.B, SBY
Hushovd, Oyvind 5 CCO, GBU, IMN, LIM, WTO
Lanthier, J. Spencer 5 EME, ITP, PS.NV.B, X, ZL
Newall, J.M. Edward 5 AL, CP, MFI, NCX, RY
Osborne, Ronald W. 5 FSH.SV, SHC, ST.SV.A, SLF, TS.NV.B
Prichard, J. Robert S. 5 BMO, FSH.SV, WN, OCX.SV, TS.NV.B
Tapp, Lawrence G. 5 ATA, CCL.NV.B, HKY, TLM, WCS.A
These 16 directors had a huge influence on Canadian Markets
0.95% of
Directors
31% of
Companies
50% of Composite
Market Cap
3
16 Elite Directors…
sit on 68 Index boards…
31%
50.69%
comprising $437B market capitalization
All except Tapp and Mazankowski were interconnected.
CockwellBérard
McKenna
Lanthier
OsborneMazankowski
Prichard
4
TappMacNeill
Prichard
Godsoe
Baillie
Hushovd
O’Brien
Cleghorn
Fortier
Newall
In 2006 only 5 sit on 5 or more boards on the S&P/TSX Composite.
Directors Number of Boards
MacNeill, Brian F. 7
Cockwell, Jack L. 6
Mazankowski, Rt. Hon. D.F. 6
McKenna, Hon. F.J. 6Directors Number of Boards
2006
2004
Directors on 5 or more boards
5
O’Brien, David P. 6
Baillie, A. Charles 5
Bérard, André 5
Cleghorn, John E. 5
Fortier, L. Yves 5
Godsoe, Peter C. 5
Hushovd, Oyvind 5
Lanthier, J. Spencer 5
Newall, J.M. Edward 5
Osborne, Ronald W. 5
Prichard, J. Robert S. 5
Tapp, Lawrence G. 5
Directors Number of Boards
Mazankowski, Rt. Hon. D.F. 6
Desmarais, André 5
Lanthier, J. Spencer 5
Osborne, Ronald W. 5
Prichard, J. Robert S. 5
So the CC(BE)2 re-defined the Elite as the 22 non-management directors who sit on 4 or more boards.
Director Number of Boards
Mazankowski, Rt. Hon. D.F. 6
Lanthier, J. Spencer 5
Osborne, Ronald W. 5
Prichard, J. Robert S. 5
Director Number of Boards
Giffin, Hon. Gordon D. 4
Godsoe, Peter C. 4
Graham, Anthony R. 4
Griffiths, Anthony F. 4
6
Beatty, David R. 4
Bolton, Hugh J. 4
Chevrier, Robert 4
Desautels, L. Denis 4
Ducros, Pierre Y. 4
Gauthier, Hon. Paule 4
Gibara, Germaine 4
Hushovd, Oyvind 4
MacNeill, Brian F. 4
McCoy, Richard H. 4
McLennan, John T. 4
O’Brien, David P. 4
Phillips, Roger 4
Willson, John M. 4
As before the 2006 Elite continue to have huge influence over the S&P/TSX Composite Index.
comprising a
1% of
Directors
25% of
Companies
63% of
Market Cap
7
25%
63%
22 Elite Directors…
sit on 69 companies…
comprising a $900B market capitalization
The average governance scores*, of these 22 directors are well above the rest of the composite.
93
91.2
5
89.7
5
89.2
5
88.2
5
84.7
5
83.7
5
83.7
5
78.7
5
78.7
5
78
78
77.5
76
75.4
71.7
5
71.2
70.2
5
70
67.5
61.830
405060708090100
Average score of
companies w/o
elite directors:
71.57
8
78.7
5
78.7
5
77.5
75.4
71.7
5
71.2
70.2
5
70
67.5
61.8
48.5
010203040
Beatty, David R.
Giffin, Hon. Gordon D.
Gauthier, Hon. Paule
O'Brien, David P.
Phillips, Roger
Ducros, Pierre Y.
MacNeill, Brian F.
Willson, John M.
Gibara, Germaine
Hushovd, Oyvind
Griffiths, Anthony F.
McCoy, Richard H.
Bolton, Hugh J.
Chevrier, Robert
Prichard, J. Robert S.
McLennan, John T.
Lanthier, J. Spencer
Desautels, L. Denis
Godsoe, Peter C.
Graham, Anthony R.
Osborne, Ronald Walter
Mazankowski, Rt. Hon. Donald F.
* based on the Clarkson Centre’s “Board Shareholder Confidence Index”
As before, these 22 directors form a network through which information and practices can be dispersed.
Beatty
Desautels
Hushovd
Prichard
GodsoeGraham
Mazankowski
DucrosMacNeill
9
Chevrier
Willson
Griffiths
McLennan
McCoy
Gauthier
Gibara
OsborneLanthier
Phillips
O’Brien
Giffin
Bolton
The New Elite continue to promote best practices examples on matters relating to independence.
70%
80%
90%
100%
Elite
10
77% 9
0%
75%
60%
84%
61%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Board
Independence
Audit Committee
Independence
Compensation
Committee
Independence
The Rest
…and in board and director evaluations.
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Elite
11
75%67%
55% 53%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Board Evaluations Director Evaluations
Elite
The Rest
Elite directors sit on 15 company boards that received a share structure deduction*
Company Name Director Name(s)
ACE Aviation Holdings Inc. Richard H. McCoy, John T. McLennan
Alliance Atlantis Communications Inc. Anthony F. Griffiths
ATCO Ltd. Rt. Hon. Donald F. Mazankowski
Bombardier Inc. L. Denis Desautels
Cogeco Cable Inc. Germaine Gibara
Four Seasons Hotels Inc. Ronald Walter Osborne, Prichard, J. Robert S. Prichard
12
* A deduction occurs when a company has a dual class share structure where equity does not equal voting power. This area can result in the largest deduction of any category in the Board Shareholder Confidence Index.
Four Seasons Hotels Inc. Ronald Walter Osborne, Prichard, J. Robert S. Prichard
The Jean Coutu Group (PJC) Inc. L. Denis Desautels
ONEX Corp. Peter C. Godsoe
Power Corporation of Canada Anthony R. Graham, Rt. Hon. Donald F. Mazankowski
Rogers Communications Inc. Peter C. Godsoe
Shaw Communications Inc. Rt. Hon. Donald F. Mazankowski
St. Lawrence Cement Group Inc. Germaine Gibara, Ronald Walter Osborne
Teck Cominco Ltd. Hugh J. Bolton
Torstar Corporation J. Spencer Lanthier, Ronald Walter Osborne, J. Robert S. Prichard
Transcontinental Inc. Robert Chevrier
= 1 of 5 lowest
scoring directors
= 1 of 5 highest
scoring directors
= Share Structure deduction
Dual class share companies did not score as highly overall as companies with a single class share structure*
13
* Scores EXCLUDE the deductions for dual class structures
Annual Averages
72747678 Companies w/
Elite Directors
Rest of
Composite
CONCLUSIONS:1. Elite directors do spread best practices effectively
14
64.2 65.5 63.9
69.371.6
64.7
69.171.2
76.6 76.3
565860626466687072
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
70%
80%
90%
100%
Co
mp
anie
s w
/ B
est P
ractices -
Board
s w
ith E
lite
dir
ecto
r(s) only
One Class
Dual Class
CONCLUSIONS:1. Elite directors do spread best practices effectively2. Elite directors are less effective in dual class environments
15
83.3%
70.4%
53.7%
46.7%
53.3%
33.3%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Comp. Committee Director Eval. CEO/Chair Split
Co
mp
anie
s w
/ B
est P
ractices -
Board
s w
ith E
lite
dir
ecto
r(s) only
CONCLUSIONS:1. Elite directors do spread best practices effectively2. Elite directors are less effective in dual class environments
16
For further information please contact: [email protected] OR [email protected]