Upload
suzanna-gibson
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The 2014 Update of the European Inventory of Validation of Non-formal and Informal Learning:
preliminary outcomes.
Ernesto VillalbaCedefop
The promise of Validation of Prior Learning as the motor of social and economic change
2014, April 9 - 11
Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Ernesto Villalba 9 April 2014 2Rotterdam
What is it?
How was it developed?
What is it telling us?
.OUTLINE
..
Preliminary results
Ernesto Villalba 9 April 2014 3Rotterdam
The road to the Council recommendation on validation of non-formal and informal learning
2001
•Making a European Area of Lifelong Learning a Reality
2002
•Copenhagen Declaration
2004
•Common European Principles for the identification and validation of non-formal and informal learning
• Europass Decision
2006
•Youthpass within ‘Youth in action’ and recognition of importance of validation in youth field
2008
•EQF
2009
•ET2020, renewed framework for EU cooperation in the youth field
•Ministers of Higher education Leuven and Louvain-la-Neuve on 28 and 29 April 2009
2010
•Bruges Communiqué (by 2015 start develop national procedures for recognition and validation)
2011
•Council conclusions Modernising higher education
•Resolution on the renewed agenda for adult learning
2012
•Communication and Council Recommendation on validation of non-formal and informal learning
Youthpass within ‘Youth in action’ and recognition of importance of validation in youth field
Memorandum in lifelong learning
Ministers of Higher education Leuven and Louvain-la-Neuve on 28 and 29 April 2009
Resolution on the renewed agenda for adult learning
Copenhaguen declaration
What is it? (I)
Ernesto Villalba 9 April 2014 4Rotterdam
Council recommendation: Member States and the Commission
European Qualifications Framework advisory group given the overall control
Provide support for the implementation
Update Guidelines and Inventory
by using the expertise of Union agencies, in particular Cedefop, and by reporting on the situation with regard to the validation of non-formal and informal learning in the annual report on the development of National Qualification Frameworks.
What is it? (II)
Inventory
Ernesto Villalba 9 April 2014 5Rotterdam
Review European Inventory on validation
Consolidate the Inventory Update the current version
(from 2004, 2005, 2008, 2010)
Facilitate future updates and systematic monitoring of progress;
Both a country-specific and a horizontal/thematic dimension;
Further develop the relationship between the Inventory and the European Guidelines on validation
• OUTCOMESo A survey of projects on
validationo A synthesis of main
findingso 36 country reports and
fiches, covering 33 countries
o 8 in-depth thematic reportso 2 case studies
What is it? (II)
1. Multi-level governance2. Early school leavers3. Skills audits in the public sector4. Validation methodologies
5. Guidance and counseling 6. Raising awareness7. Competence assessment in
the private sector8. Research themes
Ernesto Villalba 9 April 2014 6Rotterdam
Preparatory phaseJan.- Sep.
2013 • Contract preparation and awarding• Develop tools and collect information
How was it developed? (I)
• Manuel Souto • Ilona Murphy• Jo Hawley
1st draft Country reports and Fiches
Nov. 2013 • 36 country reports for 33 countries• 36 country fiches for 2014• 34 country fiches for 2010
DRAFT
Ernesto Villalba 9 April 2014 7Rotterdam
2nd draft of country fiches• Review of the comments• Agreement with EQF AG
Quality assurance• EQF AG Members • Social partners • 2 experts/country
• Steering Committee (Cedefop)
How was it developed? (II)
March-
April
2014
DRAFT
2
Thematic and case studies• 8 thematic studies• 2 Case studiesMay 2014
Dec.- Feb.
2014
Ernesto Villalba 9 April 2014 8Rotterdam
Final approval of reports• EQF AG Members to check the contents • Social partners
Final editing• Formatting
• Lay out
How was it developed? (II)
May 2014
June –
Sep.
2014
Sep.2014
and guidelines
Publishing Inventory
Ernesto Villalba 9 April 2014 9Rotterdam
What is it telling us?
Preliminary results
Ernesto Villalba 9 April 2014 10Rotterdam
What is it telling us? (I)
Does the country have a national strategy for validation? 2010
Source: 2014 European inventory on validation of non-formal and informal learning
Ernesto Villalba 9 April 2014 11Rotterdam
What is it telling us? (I)
Does the country have a national strategy for validation? 2014
Source: 2014 European inventory on validation of non-formal and informal learning
Ernesto Villalba 9 April 2014 12Rotterdam
What is it telling us? (II)
Does the country have a legal framework?
Source: 2014 European inventory on validation of non-formal and informal learning
Ernesto Villalba 9 April 2014 13Rotterdam
What is it telling us? (II)
Does the country have a legal framework?
Source: 2014 European inventory on validation of non-formal and informal learning
Ernesto Villalba 9 April 2014 14Rotterdam
What is it telling us? (III)
How long has the strategy/ framework been in place and to what extent have they been implemented?
Source: 2014 European inventory on validation of non-formal and informal learning
Ernesto Villalba 9 April 2014 15Rotterdam
What is it telling us? (III)
How long has the strategy/ framework been in place and to what extent have they been implemented?
Source: 2014 European inventory on validation of non-formal and informal learning
Ernesto Villalba 9 April 2014 16Rotterdam
What is it telling us? (IV)
Are certain sectors given priority?
2010
Source: 2014 European inventory on validation of non-formal and informal learning
Ernesto Villalba 9 April 2014 17Rotterdam
What is it telling us? (IV)
2014
Are certain sectors given priority?
Source: 2014 European inventory on validation of non-formal and informal learning
Ernesto Villalba 9 April 2014 18Rotterdam
What is it telling us? (V)
Is validation linked to qualifications frameworks?
Source: 2014 European inventory on validation of non-formal and informal learning
Ernesto Villalba 9 April 2014 19Rotterdam
What is it telling us? (V)
Is validation linked to qualifications frameworks?
Source: 2014 European inventory on validation of non-formal and informal learning
Ernesto Villalba 9 April 2014 20Rotterdam
What is it telling us? (VI)
… and to credits?
Source: 2014 European inventory on validation of non-formal and informal learning
Ernesto Villalba 9 April 2014 21Rotterdam
What is it telling us? (VI)
… and to credits?
Source: 2014 European inventory on validation of non-formal and informal learning
Ernesto Villalba 9 April 2014 22Rotterdam
What is it telling us? (VII)
Stakeholder engagement?
Source: 2014 European inventory on validation of non-formal and informal learning
Ernesto Villalba 9 April 2014 23Rotterdam
What is it telling us? (VII)
Stakeholder engagement?
Source: 2014 European inventory on validation of non-formal and informal learning
Ernesto Villalba 9 April 2014 24Rotterdam
What is it telling us? (VIII)
Has validation increased since 2010?
Source: 2014 European inventory on validation of non-formal and informal learning
02468
1012141618
Increased, Remained the same,
Some up and some down
Decreased
Increasing activity and commitment to validation
In SUMMARY
Funding schemes sustainability
H.E. increasingly opening up
NQF developments relevant
Involvement of private actors still a challenge
Development of standards
Ernesto Villalba 9 April 2014 26Rotterdam
[email protected] portal: http://www.cedefop.europa.eu
Thank you for your attention