22
The Acceptance and The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS Daris Ormesher Daris Ormesher Research Engineer Research Engineer Pierre, SD Pierre, SD South Dakota South Dakota DOT DOT Ben Hershey Ben Hershey Assoc. VP of Weather Services Assoc. VP of Weather Services Ops Ops Grand Forks, ND Grand Forks, ND Iteris Inc Iteris Inc National Rural ITS National Rural ITS Session E1 Session E1 August 11 August 11 th th , 2015 , 2015 Snowbird UT Snowbird UT NRITS – August 11 th 2015 1 South Dakota South Dakota DOT DOT Iteris, Inc. Iteris, Inc. Snowbird, UT Snowbird, UT

The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS · 2018-04-13 · The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS Daris Ormesher Research Engineer Pierre, SD South Dakota DOT Ben Hershey Assoc. VP of

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS · 2018-04-13 · The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS Daris Ormesher Research Engineer Pierre, SD South Dakota DOT Ben Hershey Assoc. VP of

The Acceptance and The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS

Daris OrmesherDaris OrmesherResearch EngineerResearch Engineer

Pierre, SDPierre, SDSouth DakotaSouth Dakota DOTDOT

Ben HersheyBen HersheyAssoc. VP of Weather Services Assoc. VP of Weather Services OpsOps

Grand Forks, NDGrand Forks, NDIteris IncIteris Inc

National Rural ITSNational Rural ITSSession E1Session E1

August 11August 11thth, 2015, 2015Snowbird UTSnowbird UT

NRITS – August 11th 20151

South Dakota South Dakota DOTDOT Iteris, Inc.Iteris, Inc.Snowbird, UTSnowbird, UT

Page 2: The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS · 2018-04-13 · The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS Daris Ormesher Research Engineer Pierre, SD South Dakota DOT Ben Hershey Assoc. VP of

OverviewOverview Introduction of MDSS

Implementation of MDSS within Operations

Approach to Accessing RecommendationsApproach to Accessing Recommendations

Results from winter season

Future Direction

NRITS – August 11th 20152

Page 3: The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS · 2018-04-13 · The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS Daris Ormesher Research Engineer Pierre, SD South Dakota DOT Ben Hershey Assoc. VP of

What is MDSS?What is MDSS?A Maintenance Decision Support System is anything helping aid the maintenance decision process.– Prior Knowledge (Experience)

d d– Snow and Ice Guidance Documents – RWIS‐ESS ObservationsFellow operators/supervisors (Communication)– Fellow operators/supervisors (Communication)

– “That’s the way we’ve always done it”–– A computer system that integrates weather, road andA computer system that integrates weather, road andA computer system that integrates weather, road and A computer system that integrates weather, road and maintenance information to provide scientifically driven maintenance information to provide scientifically driven recommendationsrecommendations

NRITS – August 11th 20153

Page 4: The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS · 2018-04-13 · The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS Daris Ormesher Research Engineer Pierre, SD South Dakota DOT Ben Hershey Assoc. VP of

Pooled Fund Study MDSS SolutionMDSS Solution

NRITS – August 11th 20154

Page 5: The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS · 2018-04-13 · The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS Daris Ormesher Research Engineer Pierre, SD South Dakota DOT Ben Hershey Assoc. VP of

Implementation of MDSS across agenciesMDSS across agencies

NRITS – August 11th 20155

Page 6: The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS · 2018-04-13 · The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS Daris Ormesher Research Engineer Pierre, SD South Dakota DOT Ben Hershey Assoc. VP of

Approach to Assessing MDSS RecommendationsMDSS RecommendationsApproach included Subjective and Objective analysis

– A feature was added to the MDSS interface allowing users to provide feedback before AND after a treatment action

– SDDOT included an in‐vehicle survey for operators

– Automated Monitoring of Weather, Road, and Treatment Actions

NRITS – August 11th 20156

Page 7: The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS · 2018-04-13 · The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS Daris Ormesher Research Engineer Pierre, SD South Dakota DOT Ben Hershey Assoc. VP of

Assess MDSS Recommendations within the MDSS Applicationwithin the MDSS ApplicationUsers have the ability assess 4 different road/weather conditions/properties

NRITS – August 11th 20157

Page 8: The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS · 2018-04-13 · The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS Daris Ormesher Research Engineer Pierre, SD South Dakota DOT Ben Hershey Assoc. VP of

Assess MDSS Recommendationswithin the MDSS Applicationwithin the MDSS Application

NRITS – August 11th 20158

Page 9: The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS · 2018-04-13 · The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS Daris Ormesher Research Engineer Pierre, SD South Dakota DOT Ben Hershey Assoc. VP of

NRITS – August 11th 20159

Page 10: The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS · 2018-04-13 · The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS Daris Ormesher Research Engineer Pierre, SD South Dakota DOT Ben Hershey Assoc. VP of

Accept / Decline Statistics TotalAccept / Decline Statistics TotalCount of Evaluation Column Labels

Row Labels ACCEPT CONDITIONALACCEPT DECLINE Grand Total

Maryland 280 46 326

New Hampshire 2 3 40 45

North Dakota 59 8 46 113

South Dakota 4 4

Wisconsin 1 1

Colorado 2 1 7 10

Indiana 1 1 2

Nebraska 4 1 5

Level of acceptance = 82%Level of acceptance = 82%

Nebraska 4 1 5

Grand Total 349 64 93 506

Level of acceptance   82%Level of acceptance   82%

Level of acceptance 2014 = 83%Level of acceptance 2014 = 83%

NRITS – August 11th 201510

Level of acceptance 2014   83%Level of acceptance 2014   83%

Page 11: The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS · 2018-04-13 · The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS Daris Ormesher Research Engineer Pierre, SD South Dakota DOT Ben Hershey Assoc. VP of

Accept / Decline StatisticsAccept / Decline StatisticsWhen 3 conditions match When 3 conditions match 

Road Condition yes

Road Temperature yes

Type of Precip yes

Count of Evaluation Column Labels

Row Labels ACCEPT CONDITIONALACCEPT DECLINE Grand Total

Colorado 2 2

M l d 272 46 318Maryland 272 46 318

Nebraska 4 1 5

New Hampshire 25 25

North Dakota 24 3 15 42

Wi i 1 1

Level of acceptance = 90%Level of acceptance = 90%

Wisconsin 1 1

Grand Total 303 50 40 393

NRITS – August 11th 201511

Level of acceptance   90%Level of acceptance   90%

Page 12: The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS · 2018-04-13 · The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS Daris Ormesher Research Engineer Pierre, SD South Dakota DOT Ben Hershey Assoc. VP of

Accept / Decline StatisticsAccept / Decline StatisticsWhen all 4 conditions match When all 4 conditions match 

Road Condition yes Four YesesRoad Temperature yesType of Precip yesMaintenance Action yesMaintenance Action yes

Count of Evaluation Column LabelsRow Labels ACCEPT CONDITIONALACCEPT DECLINE Grand TotalColorado 2 2Maryland 272 46 318Nebraska 4 1 5New Hampshire 19 19North Dakota 23 3 13 39Wisconsin 1 1

Level of acceptance = 92%Level of acceptance = 92%

Wisconsin 1 1Grand Total 302 50 32 384

NRITS – August 11th 201512

Level of acceptance   92%Level of acceptance   92%

Page 13: The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS · 2018-04-13 · The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS Daris Ormesher Research Engineer Pierre, SD South Dakota DOT Ben Hershey Assoc. VP of

Accept Percentage by Condition

MATCH CONDITION YES NOType of 95 39Type of Precipitation

95 39

Road Condition 84 49Road Temperature 82 39Maintenance Action 81 42

• Argues that a RERUN with user observed conditions should provide a more acceptable recommendationprovide a more acceptable recommendation

• However, participants did not use the feature often

NRITS – August 11th 201513

Page 14: The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS · 2018-04-13 · The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS Daris Ormesher Research Engineer Pierre, SD South Dakota DOT Ben Hershey Assoc. VP of

SDDOT Survey in Maintenance VehicleMaintenance Vehicle

NRITS – August 11th 20151414

Page 15: The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS · 2018-04-13 · The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS Daris Ormesher Research Engineer Pierre, SD South Dakota DOT Ben Hershey Assoc. VP of

SDDOT Survey in Maintenance VehicleMaintenance Vehicle

For SD34, MP 212 to 257Wed 02:16 CDT 100% Salt 100lbs

NRITS – August 11th 201515

Page 16: The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS · 2018-04-13 · The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS Daris Ormesher Research Engineer Pierre, SD South Dakota DOT Ben Hershey Assoc. VP of

SDDOT Survey in Maintenance VehicleMaintenance Vehicle

NRITS – August 11th 20151616

Page 17: The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS · 2018-04-13 · The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS Daris Ormesher Research Engineer Pierre, SD South Dakota DOT Ben Hershey Assoc. VP of

SDDOT Survey in Maintenance VehicleMaintenance Vehicle

NRITS – August 11th 20151717

Page 18: The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS · 2018-04-13 · The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS Daris Ormesher Research Engineer Pierre, SD South Dakota DOT Ben Hershey Assoc. VP of

SD Survey 2015 (1481 responses)DRIVER RESPONSE NUMBER PERCENT

NO RESPONSE 7O S O SAnswer not provided 66

Unable to get Recommendation 45

TOO LIGHT 32 8TOO LIGHT 32.8

No recommendation but one needed 239 16.1

Recommended rates were light 247 16.7

TOO HEAVY 19.6

Recommended rates were excessive 111 7.5

Recommendation provided but not needed 108 7.3Recommendation provided but not needed 108 7.3

Recommendation inappropriate for blowing snow conditions

71 4.8

APPROPRIATE 40 1

NRITS – August 11th 201518

APPROPRIATE 40.1

Yes Recommendation was within ±50 lbs 594 40.118

Page 19: The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS · 2018-04-13 · The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS Daris Ormesher Research Engineer Pierre, SD South Dakota DOT Ben Hershey Assoc. VP of

SD Survey 2014 (894 responses)DRIVER RESPONSE NUMBER PERCENT

NO RESPONSE (8.3)O S O SAnswer not provided 56

Unable to get Recommendation 18

TOO LIGHT 33 3TOO LIGHT 33.3

No recommendation but one needed 112 13.7

Recommended rates were light 161 19.6

TOO HEAVY 8.5

Recommended rates were excessive 30 3.7

Recommendation provided but not needed 29 3.5Recommendation provided but not needed 29 3.5

Recommendation inappropriate for blowing snow conditions

11 1.3

APPROPRIATE 58 2

NRITS – August 11th 201519

APPROPRIATE 58.2

Yes Recommendation was within ±50 lbs 477 58.219

Page 20: The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS · 2018-04-13 · The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS Daris Ormesher Research Engineer Pierre, SD South Dakota DOT Ben Hershey Assoc. VP of

An ‘Automated’ Approach to Assessing RecommendationsAssessing Recommendations Link to Automated Approach

NRITS – August 11th 20152020

Page 21: The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS · 2018-04-13 · The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS Daris Ormesher Research Engineer Pierre, SD South Dakota DOT Ben Hershey Assoc. VP of

Plan for 2015/16Plan for 2015/16 Training

– Clarify what recommendations can be evaluated

– Explain value of reruns

– Describe the Assessment procedures

– Solicit additional participation

Select active participants from at least 3 states for detailed study

NRITS – August 11th 201521

Page 22: The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS · 2018-04-13 · The Acceptance and Assessment of MDSS Daris Ormesher Research Engineer Pierre, SD South Dakota DOT Ben Hershey Assoc. VP of

Contact InformationContact Information– Ben Hershey – Assoc. VP of Weather Services Operations

– Office: 701‐792‐1800

– Email:  [email protected]

– Daris Ormesher – Research Engineer– Office: 605‐773‐6242

– Email:  [email protected]

NRITS – August 11th 201522