Upload
daisy-floyd
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
THE ADR PROCESSTHE ADR PROCESS~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
KEY ISSUES AND ELEMENTSKEY ISSUES AND ELEMENTS
PRESENTED BY:
Anthony N. Palladino
Associate Chief Counsel and Director
FAA Office of Dispute Resolution
for Acquisition
May 19, 1999
DECIDING WHETHER TO USE ADRDECIDING WHETHER TO USE ADR IN YOUR CASE IN YOUR CASE
• DIFFERING VIEWS ON ADR USAGE
• APPLYING CASE SCREENING CRITERIA– The ADRA of 1996
– DoJ Guidelines
CHOOSING A FORM OF ADRCHOOSING A FORM OF ADR
• THE RANGE OF ADR OPTIONS
• BINDING V. NON-BINDING
• FACILITATIVE MEDIATION
• NEUTRAL EVALUATION
THE ROLE OF LEGAL COUNSELTHE ROLE OF LEGAL COUNSEL IN ADR IN ADR
• DECISIONMAKING AUTHORITY RETAINED BY CONTRACT MANAGER OR IPT
• COUNSEL PROVIDES GUIDANCE ON: – LEGALITY
– LITIGATIVE RISK
– PRESENTATION ISSUES
– SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS
NEGOTIATING AN ADR AGREEMENTNEGOTIATING AN ADR AGREEMENT
• WRITTEN AGREEMENT DESIRABLE
• AGREEMENT SHOULD INCLUDE:– SPECIFIC ADR PROCEDURE
– SCHEDULE
– SELECTION & COMPENSATION OF NEUTRAL
• AVAILABLE SAMPLE AGREEMENTS
CONFIDENTIALITY CONFIDENTIALITY
• A KEY ADR CONSIDERATION
• ADR AGREEMENT MUST COVER
• USE IN LITIGATION
CHOOSING AN ADR NEUTRALCHOOSING AN ADR NEUTRAL
• CONSIDERATIONS:– REPUTATION
– ADR EXPERIENCE
– SUBSTANTIVE KNOWLEDGE
• IN-HOUSE OR OUTSIDE NUETRALS
• BCA JUDGES
PREPARING FOR ADRPREPARING FOR ADR
• DEVELOP FACTUAL & LEGAL ISSUES
• DOCUMENT EXCHANGES & DISCOVERY
• PREPARE POSITION STATEMENTS
• DESIGNATE PRINCIPAL
DECIDING TO SETTLEDECIDING TO SETTLE
• RISK ASSESSMENT ESSENTIAL
• EVALUATE COSTS & BENEFITS
• CONSIDER:– RELATIVE STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES– COSTS TO PROGRAM – EFFECTS ON RELATIONSHIP– BENEFITS OF SETTLEMENT
MEMORIALIZING THE SETTLEMENTMEMORIALIZING THE SETTLEMENT
• REQUIRE A WRITTEN AGREEMENT
• SIGN PRELIMINARY BEFORE LEAVING THE ADR SESSION
• ADAPT AVAILABLE FORM AGREEMENTS
• SIGNATORIES WITH AUTHORITY
MEASURING SUCCESSMEASURING SUCCESS
• VARIOUS METHODS AVAILABLE
– COMPARE TO RISK ANALYSIS
– COMPARE SETTLEMENT TO CLAIM
– COMPUTE SAVINGS COMPARED TO :
• FURTHER LITIGATION COSTS & TIME
• NEGATIVE IMPACT OF CONTINUED LIT. ON PROGRAM OR OTHER WORK