7
The ASPAN Obstructive Sleep Apnea in the Adult Patient Evidence-Based Practice Recommendation ASPAN OSA PR Strategic Work Team OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA (OSA) is associated with re- duced muscle tone in the airway leading to frequent airway ob- struction during sleep. 1 In the United States, the incidence of OSA is estimated to be 3% to 7% in men and 2% to 5% in women, rising to 41% in obese individuals, and as high as 78% in the morbidly obese. 2 Patients presenting to surgical ser- vices with OSA are at increased risk for the development of postoperative complications owing to cardiovascular dysfunc- tion and periodic sleep-associated decreases in oxygen satura- tion and hypercarbia. 3 Although awareness and diagnosis of OSA in the surgical population has increased in the past two de- cades, an estimated 80% of men and 93% of women who pres- ent for elective surgery are at risk for OSA and as yet are not diagnosed. 4 Patients with untreated OSA are in higher numbers in surgical patients, 5 and they have increased intensive care admissions and hospital costs. 6 The perianesthesia care of patients with OSA is challenging but improved patient out- comes can be achieved using evidence-based strategies for OSA management. 7 Background OSA affects approximately 2% to 26% of the general population, making it the most common sleep-related breathing disorder. 6 In addition to an increased mortality, OSA also has been found to in- crease the risk of cardiovascular diseases and motor vehicle crash. The incidence of OSA increases with age, with 7% to 62% patients aged older than 60 years having OSA. 7 The use of sleep study evaluation (polysomnography) remains the gold stan- dard for the evaluation of patients suspected of having OSA. 8 It is encouraged for use in conjunction with medical history, family in- terview using focused questions, and physical examination for the preoperative evaluation of OSA. 3 Patients with undiagnosed OSA present many challenges for anesthetic management and have an increased incidence of perioperative morbidity, postop- erative complications, difficult intubation, have a longer length of stay in the hospital, and a higher rate of intensive care admission. 9 Address correspondence to the ASPAN National Office, 90 Frontage Road, Cherry Hill, NJ 08034; e-mail address: [email protected]. Ó 2012 by American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses 1089-9472/$36.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2012.07.003 Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing, Vol 27, No 5 (October), 2012: pp 309-315 309

The ASPAN Obstructive Sleep Apnea in the Adult Patient Evidence-Based Practice Recommendation

  • Upload
    phamdan

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The ASPAN Obstructive Sleep Apnea in the Adult Patient Evidence-Based Practice Recommendation

The ASPAN Obstructive Sleep Apneain the Adult Patient Evidence-Based

Practice Recommendation

ASPAN OSA PR Strategic Work Team

OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA (OSA) is associated with re-

duced muscle tone in the airway leading to frequent airway ob-

struction during sleep.1 In the United States, the incidence of

OSA is estimated to be 3% to 7% in men and 2% to 5% in

women, rising to 41% in obese individuals, and as high as

78% in the morbidly obese.2 Patients presenting to surgical ser-vices with OSA are at increased risk for the development of

postoperative complications owing to cardiovascular dysfunc-

tion and periodic sleep-associated decreases in oxygen satura-

tion and hypercarbia.3 Although awareness and diagnosis of

OSA in the surgical population has increased in the past two de-

cades, an estimated 80% of men and 93% of women who pres-

ent for elective surgery are at risk for OSA and as yet are not

diagnosed.4 Patients with untreated OSA are in higher numbersin surgical patients,5 and they have increased intensive care

admissions and hospital costs.6 The perianesthesia care of

patients with OSA is challenging but improved patient out-

comes can be achieved using evidence-based strategies for

OSA management.7

Background

OSA affects approximately 2% to 26% of the general population,

making it the most common sleep-related breathing disorder.6 In

addition to an increased mortality, OSA also has been found to in-

crease the risk of cardiovascular diseases and motor vehiclecrash. The incidence of OSA increases with age, with 7% to

62% patients aged older than 60 years having OSA.7 The use of

sleep study evaluation (polysomnography) remains the gold stan-

dard for the evaluation of patients suspected of having OSA.8 It is

encouraged for use in conjunction with medical history, family in-

terview using focused questions, and physical examination for

the preoperative evaluation of OSA.3 Patients with undiagnosed

OSA present many challenges for anesthetic management andhave an increased incidence of perioperative morbidity, postop-

erative complications, difficult intubation, have a longer length

of stay in the hospital, and a higher rate of intensive care

admission.9

Address correspondence to the ASPAN National Office, 90 Frontage Road,

Cherry Hill, NJ 08034; e-mail address: [email protected].

� 2012 by American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses

1089-9472/$36.00

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2012.07.003

Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing, Vol 27, No 5 (October), 2012: pp 309-315 309

Page 2: The ASPAN Obstructive Sleep Apnea in the Adult Patient Evidence-Based Practice Recommendation

aPatients with previously diagnosed OSA

should have an established plan of care

for the perianesthesia period.

310 ASPAN OSA PRACTICE RECOMMENDATION

Purpose

This practice recommendation (PR) is intended to promote peri-

anesthesia patient safety in the care of adult patients (older than

18 years) with known or suspected OSA who have received opi-

oids, procedural sedation, or general or regional anesthesia. It is

not intended to be all-inclusive. Each institution should develop

a multidisciplinary guideline to meet the needs of its patient pop-

ulation and personnel resources.

Recommendations

1. Assess and screen patients for risk factors/comorbidities asso-

ciated with OSA.

OSA risk factors/comorbidities in the adult patient are:

A. Body mass index (BMI) greater than 3010-13

B. Increased abdominal fat14

C. Cardiovascular disease

i. Hypertension2,8,10-15

ii. Resistant hypertension15

iii. Ischemic heart disease8,11,16,17

iv. Idiopathic cardiomyopathy and congestive heart fail-

ure8,17

v. Atrial fibrillation8

D. Age11,12,17,18

i. Men peak prevalence: 50 to 59 years

ii. Women peak prevalence: 60 to 64 years

iii. Men have higher risk of OSA than women until men-

opause7,11,17

E. Male gender17,19

F. Endocrine dysfunction

i. Type II diabetes20

ii. Metabolic syndrome7

iii. Altered glucose tolerance20

iv. Thyroid disease17

G. Associated hypercapnia seen in21

i. Increased BMI

ii. Restrictive chest wall mechanics

iii. Decreased overnight saturation

H. Enlargement of upper airway22

I. Stroke (history of stroke associated with increased risk of

stroke and mortality)17

J. Ethnicity: Black greater than Caucasian17

K. Lower socioeconomic status: Independent risk factor

for OSA12

2. Assess and screen undiagnosed patients for signs and symp-toms of OSA.a

OSA symptoms are as follows:

A. Daytime sleepiness8,11,23

B. Observed snoring8,10,11,23-25

C. Snoring under sedation26,27

Page 3: The ASPAN Obstructive Sleep Apnea in the Adult Patient Evidence-Based Practice Recommendation

ASPAN OSA PRACTICE RECOMMENDATION 311

D. Dry mouth or sore throat8,11,24

E. Morning headache8

F. Fatigue or malaise8,10

G. Apnea reported by sleeping partner8,11

H. Restlessness11

I. Drowsiness with driving23

J. Awakening unrefreshed after sleep11

K. Nocturia11

bPositive screenings should initiate com-

munication with the patient, physician

providers.

3. Incorporate the use of standardized screening tool to identify

patients at risk for OSA.b

The use of the Berlin Questionnaire (BQ) is well established in the

OSA literature; however, there has been limited application of the

BQ in the perianesthetic patient. Tools specific to the perianes-

thetic population of patients have been suggested by the Ameri-

can Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA),3 but their use has

limited supportive data.

Currently, two recommended tools exist and include:

cFor more information regarding the

STOP-Bang tool, visit http://www.stop

bang.ca/, the official STOPBang Question-

naire Website.

A. STOP-BANGc,5,6,28

B. ASA OSA checklist6 (snoring, tired, observed with ap-

nea, high blood Pressure, body mass index greater

than 25 Kg/m2, age greater than 50 years old, neck cir-

cumference greater than 40 cm and male gender)

4. Initiate postanesthesia management of the patient with diag-nosed or suspected OSA. Phase I and II management includes:

dPain management background:

� OSA patients are at risk of respiratory

depression postoperatively owing to

decreased pharyngeal activity

� OSA patients are sensitive to opioids and

sedatives

� Health care providers need to have

heightened awareness in this patient

population

A. Routine monitoring and the addition of capnography

when available3

B. Positioning the patient with OSA in a lateral, lateral re-

cumbent, or sitting position; avoid placing the patient

in supine position unless clinically indicated28-30

C. Providing continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)/

bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP) as prescribedearly in the postoperative course to reduce respiratory

effort and may reduce other complications3,31,32

D. Individualizing pain managementd plan of care based on

severity of OSA, type of procedure, and need for opi-

oids33-35

E. Advocating for the use of multimodal approach

(using medications from different categories, such

as nonsteroidal agents, acetaminophen, tramadol,clonidine, COX2 inhibitors, ketamine, gabapentin,

and dexmedetomidine)9,34-37

F. Advocating for the use of regional anesthesia for pain

control (epidural, nerve blocks)3,36

G. Initiation of careful titration of opioids, if needed3,38-40

H. Noting that if patient-controlled analgesia is used, a basal

opioid infusion is not recommended3,33

I. Considering the use of nonpharmacologic comfortmeasures41

J. Patient may require extended monitoring in the immedi-

ate postoperative period38

Page 4: The ASPAN Obstructive Sleep Apnea in the Adult Patient Evidence-Based Practice Recommendation

eDesaturation occurs when the percentage

of oxygen delivered to the tissues (SpO2)

drops with changes in carbon dioxide

levels, pH, body temperature, and hemo-

globin. Hypoxemia is defined as an SpO2

of 90% and severe hypoxemia when the

SpO2 is 75%.49

fA hypoxemic event is defined as a sus-

tained decline in SaO2 requiring interven-

tion for improvement (ie, stimulation or

supplemental oxygen).

gAdherence with treatment was reported to

be dependent on ongoing layers of infor-

mation in educational programs, written

instructions, equipment demonstration,

and timely trouble shooting of encoun-

tered problems.48 An obstacle encountered

for the implementation of educational pro-

grams is the lack of psychological pre-

paredness required for behavioral

change.45 If adequate education is not

given, it can cause fear, anxiety, and non-

adherence.47

Negative messages emphasiz-

ing the consequences of untreated OSA

resulted in greater adherence.47

312 ASPAN OSA PRACTICE RECOMMENDATION

5. Plan for patient discharge with diagnosed or suspected OSA:

Phase I Postanesthesia Care Unit (PACU).

There is very little empirical evidence to guide this sec-

tion of the OSA-PR.

� The patient should not have signs of desaturatione when

left undisturbed in the Phase I PACU

� Anticipate extended PACU stay42,35

6. Plan for patient discharge with diagnosed or suspected OSA:

Phase II PACU.

� Room air oxygen saturation (SpO2) should return to base-line3,33

� No evidence of hypoxia or obstruction when patient is

left undisturbed for 30 minutes3,33

� Patients should be observed while asleep and unstimu-

lated, to establish that their room air SpO2 remains at

baseline3

� Anticipate a minimum observation period of 2 to 6

hours33,43

� Outpatients should be observed on average 3 hours lon-

ger than non-OSA counterparts before discharge to

home3

� With each hypoxemicf and/or obstructive event, moni-

toring should continue for 7 hours after last episode3

� If there is no requirement for high-dose oral opioids post-

operatively, the patient may be discharged to home35

� Consult with anesthesia/surgeon for appropriateness ofdischarge for patients requiring oral opioids for painman-

agement at home43

� If no problems in the Phase II PACU, the patient may dis-

charge to home.44 Discharge criteria include, but are not

limited to:

��

Return to baseline level of consciousness44

Oxygen saturation should be greater than 94% or at

baseline for at least 2 hours before discharge43

Able to use CPAP on returning home44

7. Provide discharge education to patients with suspected/diag-

nosed OSA.g

There is very little empirical evidence to guide this sec-

tion of the OSA-PR.

� Patients should be educated about their continued risk

for respiratory compromise for 1 week postoperatively

� Patients being discharged with CPAP therapy should be

reminded that the use of CPAP therapy is crucial during

the first postoperative week42,46

� To prevent oversedation, patients need to be taught the

risks of taking more than the prescribed dose of pain or

sedating medications, including over-the-counter medi-cations, during this high risk recovery period

Page 5: The ASPAN Obstructive Sleep Apnea in the Adult Patient Evidence-Based Practice Recommendation

ASPAN OSA PRACTICE RECOMMENDATION 313

� Patients need to have a responsible adult caregiver with

them overnight after discharge; this should be emphasized

with the patient

� Patients should be encouraged to sleep on their sides, in

prone, or sitting position3

� Responsible caregivers should be taught how to apply theCPAP therapy before discharge to home

Acknowledgments

Strategic Work Team Members

SQAD #1: Questions 1 to 6

– Coleader: Dina Krenzischek, PhD, RN, CPAN, FAAN

– Coleader: Kim Noble, PhD, RN, CPAN

– Amy Dooley, MS, RN, CPAN

– Laura Kling, MSN, RN, CNS, CPAN, CAPA

– Kim Kraft, BSN, RN, CPAN

– Jan Lopez, BSN, RN, CPAN, CAPA

– Cecilia Reyes, BSN, RN

– Kyra Stewart, RN, CPAN

SQAD #2: Questions 7 to 9

– Leader: Daphne Stannard, PhD, RN, CCRN, CCNS, FCCM

– Cynthia Beane, RN, RNLC, CPAN

– Debbie Sandlin-Leming, RN, CPAN

– Renee Smith, BSN, MS, RN, CPAN, CAPA

– Marie Wiegert, BSN, MAN, RN, CPAN, CAPA

SQAD #3: Questions 10 to 12

– Leader: Barbara Krumbach, MSN, RN, CNS, CPAN

– Theresa Clifford, MSN, RN, CPAN

– Stephanie Kassulke, MSN, RN, CPAN

– Ellen Poole, PhD, RN, CPAN, CNE

– Linda Ziolkowski, MSN, RN, CPAN

SQAD #4: Questions 13 to 16

– Leader: Kathy DeLeskey, DNP, RN, CPAN, CNE

– Linda Beagley, BSN, MS, RN, CPAN

– Deborah Bickford, BSN, RN, CPAN

– Maureen McLaughlin, MS, RN, CPAN, CAPA

– Candace Taylor, BSN, RN, CPAN

– Karen Wessels, MSN/Ed, RN, CPAN

SQAD #5: Questions 17 to 18

– Leader: Sarah Brynelson, BSN, MS, RN

– Kathy Daley, MSN, RN, CNS, CCRN-CMC-CSC, CPAN

– Susan Russell, BSN, RN, JD, CPAN, CAPA

– Ellen Sullivan, BSN, RN, CPAN

– Tracy Underwood, BSN, RN

References

1. Park JG, Ramar K, Olson EJ. Updates on definition, consequences, and man-

agement of obstructive sleep apnea. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011;86:549-555.

2. Malhotra A, Loscalzo J. Sleep and cardiovascular disease: An overview. Prog

Cardiovasc Dis. 2009;51:279-284.

3. American Society of Anesthesiologists. Practice guidelines for the periopera-

tive management of patients with obstructive sleep apnea: A report by the Amer-

ican Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on perioperative management of

patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Anesthesiology. 2006;104:1081-1093.

4. Gali B, Whalen FX, Schroedar DR, Gay PC, Plevak DJ. Identification of pa-

tients at risk for postoperative respiratory complications using a perioperative

Page 6: The ASPAN Obstructive Sleep Apnea in the Adult Patient Evidence-Based Practice Recommendation

314 ASPAN OSA PRACTICE RECOMMENDATION

obstructive sleep apnea screening tool and postanesthesia care assessment. Anes-

thesiology. 2009;110:869-877.

5. Chung F, Yegneswaran B, Liao P, et al. STOP questionnaire: A tool to screen

patients for obstructive sleep apnea. Anesthesiology. 2008a;108:812-821.

6. Chung F, Yegneswaran B, Liao P, et al. Validation of the Berlin Questionnaire

and ASA Checklist as screening tools for obstructive sleep apnea in surgical pa-

tients. Anesthesiology. 2008b;108:822-830.

7. Cherniack EP, Cherniack NS. Obstructive sleep apnea, metabolic syndrome,

and age: Will geriatricians be caught asleep on the job? Aging Clin Exp Res. 2009;

22:1-7.

8. Parish JM, Somers VK. Obstructive sleep apnea and cardiovascular disease.

Mayo Clin Proc. 2004;79:1036-1046.

9. Chung S, Yuan H, Chung F. A systematic review of obstructive sleep apnea

and its implications for anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:1543-1563.

10. Hiestand DM, Britz P, Goldman M, Phillips B. Prevalence of symptoms and

risk of sleep apnea in the US population. Chest. 2006;130:780-786.

11. Reishtein JL. Obstructive sleep apnea: A risk factor for cardiovascular dis-

ease. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2011;26:106-116.

12. Tarasiuk A, Greenberg-Dolan S, Simon T, Oksenberg A, Reuveni H. Low so-

cioeconomic status is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease among adult obstruc-

tive sleep apnea syndrome patients requiring treatment. Chest. 2006;130:766-773.

13. Sheldon A, Belan I, Neill J, Rowland S. Nursing assessment of obstructive

sleep apnea in hospitalized adults: A reviewof risk factors and screening tools. Con-

temp Nurse. 2009;34:19-33.

14. Schafer H, Pauleit D, Sudhop T, Gouni-Berthold I, Ewig S, Berthold HK. Body

fat distribution, serum leptin, and cardiovascular risk factors in men with obstruc-

tive sleep apnea. Chest. 2002;122:829-839.

15. Goncalves SC, Martinez D, Gus M, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea and resis-

tant hypertension: A case controlled study. Chest. 2007;132:1858-1862.

16. Sorajja D, Gami AS, Somers VK, Behrenbeck TR, Garcia-Touchard A, Lopez-

Jimenez F. Independent association between obstructive sleep apnea and coronary

artery disease. Chest. 2008;133:927-933.

17. Shah N, Roux F. The relationship of obesity and obstructive sleep apnea.

Clin Chest Med. 2009;30:455-465.

18. Larsson LG, Lindberg A, Lundback R, Lundback B. Gender differences in

symptoms related to sleep apnea in a general population and in relation to referral

to sleep clinic. Chest. 2003;124:204-211.

19. Shama SK, Kumpawat S, Banga A, Goehl A. Prevalence and risk factors of

obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in a population of Delhi, India. Chest. 2006;

130:149-156.

20. Tasali E, Mokhlesi B, Cauter EV. Obstructive sleep apnea and type 2 diabetes:

Interacting epidemics. Chest. 2008;133:496-506.

21. Kaw R, Hernandez AV, Walker E, Aboussouan L, Mokhlesi B. Determinants

of hypercarbia in obese patients with obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review

and metaanalysis of cohort studies. Chest. 2009;136:787-796.

22. Schwab RJ, Pasirstein M, Pierson R, et al. Identification of upper airway an-

atomic risk factors for obstructive sleep apneawith volumetric resonance imaging.

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;168:522-530.

23. Netzer NC, Hoegel JJ, Loube D, et al. Prevalence and symptoms of sleep ap-

nea in primary care. Chest. 2003;124:1406-1414.

24. Oksenberg A, Froom P, Melamed S. Dry mouth upon awakening in obstruc-

tive sleep apnea. J Sleep Res. 2006b;15:317-320.

25. Ishii L, Godoy A, Ishman S, Gourin CG, Ishii M. A nasal obstruction symptom

evaluation as a screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea. Arch Otolaryngol Head

Neck Surg. 2011;137:119-123.

26. Sharara AI, Zahabi LE, Maasri K, et al. Persistent snoring under conscious se-

dation during colonoscopy is a predictor of obstructive sleep apnea. Gastrointest

Endosc. 2010;71:1224-1230.

27. Lakdawala L. Creating a safer perianesthesia environment with an obstruc-

tive sleep apnea screening tool. J PeriAnesth Nurs. 2011;26:15-24.

Page 7: The ASPAN Obstructive Sleep Apnea in the Adult Patient Evidence-Based Practice Recommendation

ASPAN OSA PRACTICE RECOMMENDATION 315

28. Isono S, Tanaka A, Ishikawa T, Tagaito Y, Nishino T. Sniffing position im-

proves pharyngeal airway patency in anesthetized patients with obstructive sleep

apnea. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:489-494.

29. Oksenberg A, Khamaysi I, Silverberg DS, Tarasiuk A. Association of body po-

sition with severity of apneic events in patients with severe nonpositional obstruc-

tive sleep apnea. Chest. 2000;118:1018-1024.

30. Wietske R, Kox D, den Herder C, Laman M, van Tinteren H, de Vries N. The

role of sleep position in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Eur Arch Otorhinolar-

yngol. 2006;296:946-950.

31. Squadrone V, Coha M, Cerutti E, et al. Continuous positive airway pressure

for treatment of postoperative hypoxemia: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA.

2005;293:589-595.

32. Kindgen-Miles D, Muller E, Buhl R, et al. Nasal-continuous positive airway

pressure reduces pulmonary morbidity and length of hospital stay following thor-

acoabdominal aortic surgery. Chest. 2005;128:821-828.

33. Adesanya A, Won L, Greilich NB, Girish J. Perioperative management ob-

structive sleep apnea. Chest. 2010;138. 1489-1489.

34. Chung F, Elsaid H. Screening of OSA before surgery; why is it important?

Curr Opin Anesthesiol. 2009;22:405-411.

35. Seet E, Chung F. Obstructive sleep apnea: Preoperative assessment. Anes-

thesiol Clin. 2010b;28:199-215.

36. Haeck P, Swanson JA, Iverson RE, Lynch DJ, ASPS Safety Committee. Evi-

dence-based patient safety advisory: Patient assessment and prevention of pulmo-

nary side effects in surgery, Part 1–Obstructive sleep apnea and obstructive lung

disease. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:45S-56S.

37. Passante A, Tielborg M. Anesthetic management of patients with obesity

with and without sleep apnea. Clin Chest Med. 2009;30:567-578.

38. Pawlik MT, Hansen E, Waldhauser D, Selig C, Kuehnel TS. Clonidine pre-

medication in patients with sleep apnea syndrome: A randomized, double-blind,

placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2005;101:1374-1380.

39. Moos D, Cuddeford J. Implications of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome for

the perianesthesia nurse. J PeriAnesth Nurs. 2006;21:103-118.

40. Blake DW, Yew CY, Donnan GB, Williams DL. Postoperative analgesia and

respiratory events in patients with symptoms of obstructive sleep apnea. Anesth

Intensive Care. 2009;37:720-725.

41. Paje D, Kremer M. The perioperative implications of obstructive sleep ap-

nea. Orthop Nurs. 2006;25:291-297.

42. Benumof J. Obesity, sleep apnea, the airway and anesthesia. Curr Opin

Anaesthesiol. 2004;17:21-30.

43. Bolden N, Smith C, Auckley D. Avoiding adverse outcomes in patients with

obstructive sleep apnea (OSA): Development and implementation of a periopera-

tive OSA protocol. J Clin Anesth. 2009;21:286-293.

44. Stierer T, Fleisher L. Challenging patients in an ambulatory setting. Anes-

thesthesiol Clin North America. 2003;21:243-261.

45. Essig MG. Patient Education Handouts: Sleep Apnea. Fort Drum Medical

Activity; 2008.

46. Smith I, Nadig V, Lasserson TJ. Educational, supportive and behavioural in-

terventions to improve usage of continuous positive airway pressure machines for

adults with obstructive sleep apnoea [Review]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.

2009;2:CD007736.

47. TruppRJ, Corwin EJ, AhijevychKL,Nygren T. The impact of educationalmes-

sage framing on adherence to continuous positive airway pressure therapy. Behav

Sleep Med. 2011;9:38-52.

48. Bollig SM. Encouraging CPAP adherence: It is everyone’s job. Respir Care.

2010;55:1230-1239.

49. Drain C, Odom-Forren J. PeriAnesthesia Nursing: A Critical Care Ap-

proach, 5th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2010.