Upload
deryanaz
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Separative Self in Sylvia Plath's The Bell Jar
Critic: Diane S. Bonds
Source: Women's Studies, Vol. 18, No. 1, May, 1990, pp. 49-64. Reproduced by
permission
Criticism about: Sylvia Plath (1932-1963), also known as: Victoria Lucas, Mrs.
Ted Hughes
[(essay date May 1990) In the following essay, Bonds reconsiders feminist critical
analysis of The Bell Jar, drawing attention to Esther Greenwood's recovery in the
novel. According to Bonds, Esther fails to establish an autonomous, or separative,
self, and ultimately resorts to "culturally-ingrained stereotypes of women."]
Plath's novel The Bell Jar dramatizes the collusion between the notion of a
separate and separative self (or bounded, autonomous subject) and the cultural
forces that have oppressed women. The pervasive imagery of dismemberment
conveys the alienation and self-alienation leading to Esther Greenwood's
breakdown and suicide attempt; the recovery which Plath constructs for her
heroine merely reenacts the dismemberments obsessively imaged in the first half of
the novel. This "recovery" denies the relationality of the self and leaves Esther to
define herself unwittingly and unwillingly in relation to culturally-ingrained
stereotypes of women. Contemporary feminist theory has questioned the validity of
the separative model of selfhood, but literary critics have brought to the novel the
same assumptions about the self which inform Plath's book. Thus they have failed
to recognize what the novel has to teach about the destructive effects--at least for
women--of our cultural commitment to that model.
As Paula Bennett has written, Sylvia Plath's The Bell Jar offers a brilliant
evocation of "the oppressive atmosphere of the 1950s and the soul-destroying
effect this atmosphere could have on ambitious, high-minded young women like
Plath." It has not been widely recognized, however, that the "soul-destroying
effect" of Plath's social context is dramatized as vividly by the putative recovery of
the heroine as by her breakdown and attempted suicide. The novel presents the
transformation of Esther Greenwood from a young woman who hates the idea of
serving men in any way to one who appears to earn her exit from the asylum by
committing herself, albeit unwittingly, precisely to that project. In the first half of
the novel, the pervasive imagery of dismemberment conveys the alienation and
self-alienation leading to Esther's breakdown and suicide attempt. In the second
half of the novel a pattern of symbolic rebirth is superimposed on a narrative which
in its details suggests that Esther purchases her "new" self by the discontinuance of
any relations that might threaten by means of intimacy or tenderness the
boundaries of a self conceived as an autonomous entity, as a separate and
"separative" self.
Contemporary feminist theory has questioned the validity of this model of the self.
Catherine Keller, for example, has recently drawn on theology, philosophy,
psychology (including the work of Nancy Chodorow and Carol Gilligan), and
literature, to demonstrate in impressive detail the historic collusion between the
notion of a separate subject or bounded, autonomous self and the cultural forces
that have oppressed women. The Bell Jar vividly illustrates that collusion by
proposing, through its representation of Esther's recovery, an ideal of a self
uncontaminated by others. But such a conception of the self denies the undeniable:
the relationality of selfhood. The recovery which Plath constructs for her heroine
reenacts the dismemberments obsessively imaged in the first half of the novel; I
would argue that it merely leaves Esther prey to defining herself unwittingly and
unwillingly in relation to all that remains to her: culturally-ingrained stereotypes of
women. Critics for the most part seem to have brought to the novel the same
assumptions about the self which inform Plath's book, assumptions deriving from a
separative model of the self. Thus they have failed to recognize what the novel has
to teach about the effects of our cultural commitment to that model…
Source: Diane S. Bonds, "The Separative Self in Sylvia Plath's The Bell Jar," in
Women's Studies, Vol. 18, No. 1, May, 1990, pp. 49-64. Reproduced by
permission.
Gale Database: Contemporary Literary Criticism
© 1999 The Gale Group. All rights reserved.