Please read my pdf ‘THE BOSTON BOMBING PSY-OP’ before reading on http://sharonkilby.co.uk/site/THE_BOSTON_BOMBING_PSY-OP.php My comments throughout this pdf are, as always, in red. Jahar Tsarnaev’s friends are also victims of the BB psy-op, and have therefore also suffered a gross injustice. I intend to cover that more fully in another pdf. For now take a look at this indictment – USA v Dias Kadyrbayev and Azamat Tazhayakov https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/usao-ma/legacy/2013/08/29/KadyrbayevTazhayakovIndict.pdf See also http://www.mad.uscourts.gov/training/pdf/spsindi.pdf Dias and Azamat were charged with: Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice, Obstruction of Justice, Aiding and Abetting. The prosecutors and ‘defence’ lawyers and judges and FBI agents are up to their necks in the biggest conspiracy since 9/11. These disgusting hypocrites are also the ones who are guilty of obstructing justice, of aiding and abetting and of a hell of a lot more [much worse] crimes. They and ‘another conspirator’ Robel Phillipos [who was charged with lying to the Feds; I contend it is the federal agents who are the liars], “From on or about April 18, 2013 and continuing until on or about April 20, 2013 did knowingly alter, destroy, conceal, and cover up tangible objects belonging to Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, namely a laptop computer and a backpack containing fireworks and other items, with the intent to impede, obstruct, and influence an investigation.” The backpack in question is a JANSPORT. The indictment states: “Three days before the FBI executed its search, on the evening of April 18,[note, no time specified] 2013, after the FBI posted the photographs of Bomber One and Bomber Two, Dias KADYRBAYEV, Azamat TAZHAKAKOV, and their co-conspirator entered Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's dormitory room, removed several items from the room and brought them to the Carriage Drive apartment. Subsequently, between approximately 10:00 p.m. on April 18, 2013 and 1:22 p.m. on April 19 2013 [between the times the Tsarnaev brothers had allegedly driven to the MIT campus, and Tamerlan’s demise] KADYRBAYEV placed Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's backpack, which contained several items including fireworks and a jar of Vaseline, in a garbage bag and placed it in a dumpster outside the Carriage Drive apartment.” Why were the FBI not able to find out the exact time that Dias did this?

FBI Special Agent Kenneth Benton confirms that he found the backpack in a black bin bag in the landfill. I quote from p 142: “MR. MELLIN: If we could first pull up 1256-01 BY MR. MELLIN: Q. Agent, do you see that? A. Yes. Q. And what is that a picture of? A. The backpack that I located in the landfill. Q. Okay. 1256-02. What is that? A. That's a black plastic garbage bag with a red tie on it. Q. Do you know what the connection was to this? A. When we got information that we were in search of the backpack, we were told that the backpack was put into a black trash bag with a red tie on it.” http://thebostonmarathonbombings.weebly.com/uploads/2/4/2/6/24264849/1567_day_39_march_25_2015.pdf https://www.justice.gov/usao-ma/tsarnaev-exhibits-day-13 I copy/paste that plaid backpack exh_1256-1.pdf:

Now take a look at FBI Exhibit 7 [page 50 of the pdf] https://cbsboston.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/document44.pdf where you will find a photo of the JANSPORT backpack that was found on the landfill. I am unable to copy/paste it, and I cannot find it published anywhere else. It doesn’t look like the same backpack to me. Yes it is a black & white photo, but you can see it isn’t plaid; also there is

some smaller writing under the ‘JANSPORT’ label which isn’t present on the plaid backpack. And look at the zip arrangement – the backpack in Exh 7 has two zips below the ‘JANSPORT’ label, the plaid backpack has only one zip below it. According to a statement which was prepared by FBI Agents based on their memory of what they say was stated during interrogation [more on that coming up] Robel Phillipos says: “One of the items was a dark backpack, possibly with one red stripe.” Has that possibility of the backpack having one red stripe got anything to do with the black bin bag that has a red tie on it? i.e. is it a Masonic confusion tactic? https://cbsboston.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/document44.pdf [p 26] Jahar’s roommate Andrew Dwinells testifies that Jahar had two backpacks – “one was gray and one was black.” https://jimmysllama.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/tazhayakov-trial-transcript-day-6.pdf [p 19]. He doesn’t mention a plaid backpack. That backpack is clearly not grey or black, it is light blue with vertical and horizontal white stripes. There is no suggestion of two backpacks being taken and dumped, so why are there two FBI exhibits for this backpack? And which one of them is the one that ended up on the landfill? I have been all over the court papers in connection with the dumped JANSPORT, trying to find some clarification; to no avail. There is another JANSPORT backpack. FBI Special Agent Christian Fierabend confirms that a JANSPORT backpack was purchased the day before the marathon and that a JANSPORT was later recovered from the Laurel Street crime scene. Scroll down to p 118 of his testimony http://thebostonmarathonbombings.weebly.com/uploads/2/4/2/6/24264849/1567_day_39_march_25_2015.pdf That JANSPORT is Exh 948-268.JPG https://www.justice.gov/usao-ma/tsarnaev-exhibits-day-12 I copy/paste the image [if you enlarge the photo you’ll see the brand name]:

Does a 19 year old male really have that many backpacks? It looks like he had a grey one, a black one, three JANSPORTS, and the one he was carrying down Boylston; the one he supposedly blew up. Now I don’t know what actually happened on the evening of 18

th April

2013, or who threw that backpack in the dumpster. Andrew Dwinells testifies that he didn’t see anything being removed from the room [apart from some headphones which belonged to Azamat.] I quote from page 24 of his continued testimony https://jimmysllama.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/tazhayakov-trial-transcript-day-7.pdf [asking the questions is government attorney John Capin]: “Q. Did you have any information or belief that they had removed a computer from the dorm room that night? A. No. Q. Did you have any information or belief that they had removed a backpack from the room that night? A. No. Q. Did you have any information or belief that they removed fireworks from the room that night? A. No. Q. How about a jar of Vaseline? A. No. Q. How about Jahar's thumb drive? A. What? Q. Did you have any belief or information that they had removed

Jahar's thumb drive from the room that night? A. No.” When asked by the lawyer for Azamat Diane Ferrone to confirm that “They” hadn’t taken anything from the room; that it was only Dias who had, Dwinells responds: “I don't know. I didn't see anything get removed from the room.” And no fingerprints from any of the defendants were found on it or on the items it housed. I quote Government attorney Stephanie Siegmann: “there was no latent prints of value found on the items from Crapo Landfill, the backpack and the items. Also, the DNA of the defendants were not found, again, on the items from the Crapo Landfill.” You’d think there would be fingerprints on that backpack, and especially on the items which were found inside it; after all if viable fingerprints could be found on cardboard and paper, which somehow survived the fire caused by the Boylston bombs ... Well; you understand. https://jimmysllama.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/tazhayakov-motions-hearing-transcript.pdf [P 59.] There is no evidence that any of the friends were even at Jahar’s dorm on the evening of the 18

th April. There are so many conflicting accounts

of what happened, all of which comes from Jahar’s roommate, various FBI agents and the lawyers [of both ‘sides’] that it is impossible to know where the truth lies. I have yet to find recordings or transcripts of the actual words spoken by any of these three friends, or even Dias’ girlfriend Bayan Kumiskali, who apparently testified in court. One thing is certain, no evidence has been shown that any of these friends committed any crimes; just like Jahar, the evidence shows that they too were stitched up. More on that in a bit. The fact that there are proven lies by Federal agents such that, according to Aza’s attorney Nicholas M. Wooldridge, at least two – Special Agents Sara Wood and Farbod Azad - were impeached http://thebostonmarathonbombings.weebly.com/uploads/2/4/2/6/24264849/azamat_aquital.pdf [not that there is any publicity about that!], the fact that all the agents failed to record and make an actual record of what any of the defendants said - they skewed, twisted, fabricated and completely manipulated what they were told, the fact that there are contradictions within testimonies and contradictions of testimonies, the fact there is no hard evidence [i.e. we’re not even shown any of the actual texts that were apparently sent, we do not know the times of texts etc, there is no surveillance footage, there is no log published of the comings and goings at Jahar’s residence – Pine Dale Hall - for that day] ... the fact that there is absolutely no evidence that any of these defendants committed any crimes whatsoever tells you that none of them should have been found guilty of anything.

Just the fact that the FBI agents did not record their victims; that they did their interviewing in supermarket car parks should have your bullshit antennae glowing white hot. Folks, the American government are supposedly on the hunt for the most wanted fugitive terrorists in the USA; and their agents leave the interviews of one of those terrorists’ friends to chance – by not recording them; by recounting information they could only remember days later or even well over a year later when asked to testify in court!!! Holy cow; these bastard masons really are taking us for fukkin retards. Honestly, do you really think the FBI would behave that way if there genuinely were a couple of dangerous terrorists on the run? Hell no. Put it this way, if this was not a Masonic conspiracy i.e. a false flag [psy-op], FBI agents would have done recorded interviews of all the Tsarnaev family and all friends and associates of the brothers in proper FBI interviewing rooms. Now before expanding on any of that let’s just remind ourselves of the marathon bombing script. Have a read of what this ‘voice for justice’ James Henry says. I quote: “Few have been paying attention to the “supporting actor” trials now paving the way for the main act in the prosecution of America’s largest terrorist act since 9/11, the Boston Bombing. They’re worth paying attention to, for what they demonstrate about how the government is ensuring that the official story will stick all the way through to conviction. The latest development in this blockbuster drama came during trial and conviction of Robel Phillipos. This trial fits squarely with the particular public image of the Tsarnaevs and their friends that has arisen from media coverage and the government pronouncements in it. Anyone remotely involved with the brothers is immediately judged to be part of a nest of conniving terrorist sympathizers. That’s certainly no presumption of innocence. Phillipos undoubtedly faced this added burden in his trial. Taken together with a steady stream of leaks about the bombing investigation, it’s clear the government wants to ensure it will have a slam-dunk case against Dzhokhar Tsarnaev at his trial in January. Testimony during Phillipos’ prosecution elicited obvious contradictions in the government’s case, and demonstrated how the FBI’s interviewing

methods stack the deck in its favor, every time.” https://liberatingmemes.wordpress.com/2014/10/ All of that is true; and Henry does seem to be genuinely supportive of Jahar and his friends; however look a little closer and you realise that Henry who works for the shill site http://whowhatwhy.org/2014/05/15/are-loose-lips-sinking-accused-boston-bombers-right-to-a-fair-trial/ is just another pretender; a filthy cointelpro agent whose job it is to ensure Jahar and his friends do not get justice and that you stay firmly under control and enslaved in the Masonic matrix. You will not see Henry and the ‘whowhatwhy’ team exposing the stuff I do i.e. anything that will lead to the unravelling of the official story and, most importantly, the unveiling of the Masonic super power that controls everything. What they’re actually doing is protecting it; and in the doing they’re telling you there is nothing you can do about injustice and your enslavement. Please read my pdf ‘THE BB PSY-OP – a closer look at the work of the COINTELPRO who are geared towards the savvier truth seekers’ for more on this. http://sharonkilby.co.uk/site/THE_BB_PSY-OP_-_a_closer_look_at_the_work_of_the_COINTELPRO_who_are_geared_towards_the_savvier_truth_seekers.php The same can be said of the so-called ‘defence’ lawyers. These scumbags are all pretenders too – they’re paid big bucks [courtesy of the enslaved American public] to play along with the official narrative; they pretend to defend their clients with their numerous Masonic approved court motions [all paid for by the long-suffering hard working Americans], whilst all the time conspiring with the ‘other side’ and the judges; doing their Masonic paymaster’s bidding. If any of them decided to genuinely defend their clients, they would have to take on the all-powerful body of freemasonry. It aint happening. I’ll expand on that in a minute. So the story is that when the Tsarnaev brothers realise their faces were plastered all over the ‘news’ [disgusting dirty propaganda outlets] as the suspected marathon bombers by the FBI [who want you to believe they needed the public’s help identifying ‘white hat’ and ‘black hat’], they go on the run. Tamerlan ends up dead at some point before 1:30 a.m on Friday 19

th April after a so-called ‘shoot out’ with police. [It was actually

outright cold-blooded murder by high ranking Masonic illuminati agents.] We’re told that it isn’t until Tamerlan’s fingerprints are tested that the authorities know the identities of the brothers:- Special Agent John Walker, in answer to Stephanie Siegmann’s question “And how was it that the FBI was able to identify the individuals in those photographs?” says “We identified the first individual based on a positive

comparison of his known fingerprints. A fingerprint from the decedent [Tamerlan] was transmitted to our facility in West Virginia, the repository for fingerprints, and within moments we had a positive identification on that person.” Why wasn’t he asked to be specific about the time of this discovery? https://jimmysllama.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/tazhayakov-motion-hearing-transcript-day-one.pdf [p 89.] The search is then on for Jahar. Someone should have told D J Fife, forensic examiner in the Latent Prints Operations Unit at the FBI laboratory in Quantico, Virginia, to be more attentive to the script. Have a read of his testimony here http://thebostonmarathonbombings.weebly.com/uploads/2/4/2/6/24264849/1559_day_35_march_18_2015.pdf He says he receives “items of evidence. I process those items of evidence for the presence or detection of latent fingerprints. I can compare those latent fingerprints to known fingerprints, I can also launch those prints in a database, do automated searches. And then I issue a report, and I can testify to that in court.” [P 123.] Now read the Q & A on p 124:- “In this particular case, did you happen to get called to Boston on April 19th of 2013? A. Yes. Q. And when did you actually arrive in Boston? A. It was later in the evening sometime. Why couldn’t he be specific? Like we had been rescheduled a couple of times, so... Q. And where did you go to? What was your assignment, actually? A. My assignment was to collect known fingerprints from two individuals. Q. And where were you going to go to do that? A. The first -- they picked us up at the airport and they drove us to a location where we printed one person, and then we were taken to the second location where we printed the second person. Q. And was one of those locations Beth Israel Hospital here in Boston? A. Yes.” Er doesn’t the script say this fingerprint testing was done during the early hours of Friday morning? Notice Pellegrini, nor any other lawyer asked for clarification. Nor do the ‘alternative media’ pick up on this. Course Tam’s nor Jahar’s fingerprints were tested. They and their family were very well known to the FBI. Back to the script, Special Agent John Wanker in reply to the question by Stephanie SiegHeil “How big of a threat did the FBI believe Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was on April 19th, 2013?” says “An enormous threat to the general public and to law enforcement seeking his apprehension, sufficiently so that our Government leaders [truly evil lying scum of the earth Masonic elite] considered it prudent to effectively shut down a major metropolitan area for 12 hours or more.”

https://jimmysllama.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/tazhayakov-motion-hearing-transcript-day-one.pdf [P 91. ] Walker also says [on page 92]: “We believed that there were very likely more people involved, that there were possible cells. Lying bastard; he is part of the very conspiracy which is responsible for the marathon bombings, and the framing of the Tsarnaevs and Jahar’s friends. Our enormous and abiding focus was to ensure that we did not see a third bomb go off, if you will. Liar; he knew very well there would be no third bomb. In any case did he forget that his bosses were stressing that the only people they had decided were responsible were ‘white hat’ and ‘black hat’? I quote the FBI fake fukkers: “For clarity, these images should be the only ones—the only ones—that the public should view to assist us.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haFT1iAFBrg https://archives.fbi.gov/archives/boston/press-releases/2013/remarks-of-special-agent-in-charge-richard-deslauriers-at-press-conference-on-bombing-investigation-1 When asked how many resources were dedicated on April 19th, 2013 into finding Dzhokhar, he says he has “come to learn over the course of the last 13 months that there were thousands here in Massachusetts, and the leads likely spun around the World at that time, literally. The Legal Attaché Officers of the FBI in different places I know were engaged immediately. Again, I know of no -- nothing of greater moment during that year and in recent term of the FBI. It was of enormous significance of national consequence.” Ever wondered where your tax dollars were going? And when asked “So, is it fair to say that on April 19th, 2013, finding Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and determining whether there were any other bombs, bombers, or conspirators, or other attack plans was an urgent public safety concern?” [bloody stupid question that, isn’t it] he replies, “Without question.” The government [CARMEN M. ORTIZ United States Attorney, Stephanie Siegmann and John Capin, Assistant U.S. Attorneys] state in their reply to Robel’s motion to set aside the jury’s verdicts of guilty and enter judgments of acquittal: “As Special Agent Quinn [another lying scumbag] explained at trial, when this interview was conducted, Phillipos, Kadyrbayev, Tazhayakov were all “persons of interest in connection with the bombing itself.” The FBI did not know whether any of these

men had knowledge of the Marathon bombing before the bombing occurred. Nor did the FBI fully understand “the roles of Kadyrbayev, Tazhayakov, and the defendant in connection with the removal of any items from [Tsarnaev’s] dorm room.”” http://thebostonmarathonbombings.weebly.com/uploads/2/4/2/6/24264849/robel_aquittal_govt_reply.pdf [P 13.] Take a look at Ortiz speaking here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SelzGtv3ktI for some breathtaking hypocrisy. All things considered, you’d think that the authorities would be onto these men [and Jahar’s family and other friends and associates] quick smart. Er no. Despite their [cough] belief that they needed to descend on these poor mites with a show of enormous force, they weren’t in any hurry; they didn’t bother to show up until 10 ½ hours after Tamerlan’s death. I quote from page 8 of ‘DEFENDANT DIAS KADYRBAYEV’S POST-SUPPRESSION HEARING MEMORANDUM OF LAW WITH PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW’ prepared by Dias’ attorneys Robert G. Stahl, Laura K. Gasiorowski and Joshua F. McMahon: “In addition to HRT members, the Massachusetts State Police SWAT team (or the MSP STOP team) was at 69 Carriage Drive, as well as law enforcement agents who were part of the local JTTF. There were approximately 50 or 60 or even more tactical operators, and on the periphery, additional uniformed police officers from New Bedford, and ranking officers from the Rhode Island State Police” the “first surveillance was set up shortly before noon. The purpose of the perimeter was to ensure that Tsarnaev did not flee the area, and that the people within the apartment did not leave without the FBI having an opportunity to speak with them.”

https://www.scribd.com/doc/297232458/Doc-365-8-13-2014-US-v-Kadyrbayev-Mtn-to-Supp-DT-Laptop-Search [P 5.] [On page 3 it is stated that this occurred shortly after noon.] Jeesh, if this was not a false flag [psy-op], i.e. a Masonic conspiracy, and what we’re being told actually happened, these friends would have been rounded up and taken off for questioning very soon after Tam’s identity was known i.e. very soon after his demise. In fact Jahar’s Pinedale dorm would have immediately been secured by law enforcement; as would Tamerlan’s home, and other residences whose occupants were closely connected with the brothers. The likes of

Andrew Dwinells would also have been interviewed during the wee hours of Friday 19

th. He is also a chain yanker BTW; more on him

coming up. There would have been no need for the spectacle that surrounded 69 Carriage Drive, and no need for handcuffs [unless anyone was resisting.] It would not have been difficult to find out who was who. The first port of call would have been Jahar’s university, whereby all his friends would have been immediately identified. And, yes, it would have been done at silly o’clock in the morning. Remember the American government are desperate to find an extremely dangerous teen terrorist; so dangerous that the whole of Boston is in lockdown, whereby an unprecedented manhunt is in place, with thousands of armed cops, the U.S. army, soldiers in full battle gear, crack SWAT teams sealing off streets and conducting house-to-house searches ... Where more than a million people are cowering in their homes, under curfew, gripped by fear. Course the reality is that even if it was true that Jahar had somehow managed to plough through a wall of police [as if], and career off in a stolen SUV [L.O.F.L] and eventually find sanctuary in someone’s boat [yeah ok] the blood-sniffing dogs would have been hot on his heels, even if the dopey police were asleep on the job. So what are the bullshit brigade [masons in high places] telling us? We’re told that it was 6:50 a.m when Jahar was publically identified [p 9 of the indictment], although according to Robel it was around 4 a.m when the media were naming Jahar https://jimmysllama.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/phillipos-motion-to-dismiss-4-11-14.pdf [p 8.] See also Robel’s statement to members of the JTTF team TFO David Earle, Special Agent Dwight Schwader and Special Agent Frank Italia https://cbsboston.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/document44.pdf [p 7.] [Course it would be easy to establish exactly when the MSN were naming the brothers.] The piss takers would have you believe that it was 9 a.m when Dias’ identity was known, after doing “a logical Internet search”. [Page 6 of Dias’ post-suppression hearing memorandum.] Wtf is a logical I.S? Do the FBI do illogical searches? Don’t answer that. So, fat lot of use university officials were then?

Well let’s ask Wankin Walker. I quote the Q & A from pages 93 & 94 of ‘Day one of motion hearing’ https://jimmysllama.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/tazhayakov-motion-hearing-transcript-day-one.pdf Sieg Heil is asking the questions. “Q. Special Agent, where were you on April 19th, 2013? A. In the morning I was in Boston, and at or about 9:00 I was dispatched to New Bedford. Actually, North Dartmouth, Massachusetts, for a related investigation. Q. So, you said you actually were sent to North Dartmouth? A. Yes. Q. Where, specifically? A. I went to the Barracks of the Massachusetts State Police in North Dartmouth, Massachusetts. Q. And what was the purpose that you were sent there? A. I was to speak with a complainant who had said that he had gone to school at one point with the fugitive, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, and it was one of hundreds of leads to, as I described earlier, go out and develop lead information that could lead us to effecting the arrest. Q. What did you determine that morning as to where Dzhokhar Tsarnaev went to school? A. When I got down into the South Coast, if you will, I learned that, in fact, he was matriculated at the University of Massachusetts at Dartmouth, and

as the morning went on it became clear that, in fact, he wasn't

simply a former student or a sometimes [???] student, but that he

was a student there, and that the campus itself might be a locus for a search.” Oh fuck, this is cringeworthy. So the FBI know the

identity of ‘black hat’ fairly soon after his death [so the story goes] – at around 1:30 a.m. But it isn’t until around 9 a.m i.e. several hours later that they find out that his fugitive brother - dangerous terrorist Jahar - is a student at UMass Dartmouth; and even that discovery only came about by chance – via someone [who shall remain anonymous] who happened to call the FBI [yawn] to tell them that he used to go to the same school as Jahar. Seriously am I the only one with my jaw on the floor here??? And on top of that an FBI agent [Wanking Walker, who will one day – just like all the others - deeply regret selling out to the Masonic powers] decides [I guess he’ll say that he had the approval of his bosses] that the university campus would be a good place to visit; not to find out who Jahar’s friends/teachers etc are, but rather to conduct a search. Yeah, like the most wanted fugitive terrorist in the USA is going to go [bloodied and near death to boot, don’t forget] to a university campus. This is bullshit of epic proportions. A big lie is a propaganda technique. The expression was coined by Hitler when he dictated his book Mein Kampf about the use of a lie so "colossal" that no one would believe that someone "could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously.”

“The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.” ~J. Edgar Hoover Course no decent FBI Special Agent would go along with such outrageous lies. Why didn’t Stephanie Siegmann raise an eyebrow over Walker’s claims? She just goes along with the bullshit. Why didn’t the other lawyers or the right horrible [honourable] judge Douggie Woodcock question it? Why are all the ‘alternative media’ voices silent on such unbelievable nonsense? I’ll tell you why; because that is not something the masons want you questioning. It is the ‘out of the box’ exposure that will lead to the unravelling of this ginormous disgusting charade; that will lead to freedom and justice for Jahar and his friends, and freedom from the Masonic matrix for all of us. But, believe it or not, it gets worse. Continuing on the same page, I quote the Q & A: “So, did you actually eventually go to UMass Dartmouth that day? A. I did. Notice he wasn’t asked to specify a time. Q. And when you arrived at UMass Dartmouth, what was going on there? A. The campus was nearing completion of a total campus evacuation. The University had decided, for student and public safety, to shut down the University. Notice he wasn’t asked to clarify the time the evacuation started. Q. In addition to being a student at the University, at UMass Dartmouth, were you provided any other information from the University about Tsarnaev on that day, April 19th? A. I was. Q. Can you describe what you learned from UMass Dartmouth from the administrators or the Police Department there? You’d think that he’d at least mention Jahar’s friends. Nah; not a word about any of them. So much for the threat these three defendants posed! A. Sure. I learned that Tsarnaev was a resident on campus in a dormitory called "Pine Dale," and that, in fact, he was last thought to have gained access to that particular dormitory as late as 4:02 p.m. on Thursday, April 18th. Thought to have??? Why were the FBI not able to access the log for his movements in and out of Pine Dale that day? According to Chris Lawrence who prostitutes for CNN, students have to swipe their I.D to get entrance to the building; he says that records show Jahar did just that. How do CNN know that? Those records are not published. See this video, uploaded by some pretender[s] hiding behind the pseudonym TheNewsthatmatters1 [a more accurate – and honest – handle would be ‘ThePropagandathatmatters’] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCxMe-LHQb8 According to the

Masonic Globe “Records now show rear dorm door: Tsarnaev swiped & granted entry on 4/16/13 at 9 pm; 4/17 three times, twice around 11:30 pm; & 4/18 at 4 pm” They do not publish those records though; and don’t provide a link to the source of that information! http://live.bostonglobe.com/Event/Trial_of_Boston_Marathon_bombing_suspect_Dzhokhar_Tsarnaev?Page=166

So how did Jahar’s friends access the Pine Dale Hall building? [We’re only told about the conflicting accounts regarding entry to Jahar’s room.] If what we’re being told about the events on Thursday 18

th April was

true, the proof would be published. The Masonic conspirators would have had no qualms showing us the records of the comings and goings re Jahar’s room. Likewise if what we’re told about texts and email exchanges between Jahar and his friends or between Jahar’s friends on that day was true, they would also be published. The masons have no problems showing us unimportant exhibits, such as a photo of the door to the room Jahar shared with Andrew Dwinells, showing their name tags; and they have no problems showing us the exhibited dumped backpack[s], the black bin bag, the fireworks and the thumbnail i.e. the items which were placed on the tip by the masons themselves. I’ve scoured cyberspace for the evidence of alleged movement to and from Jahar’s dorm on that day, and also the alleged correspondence; without success. On that basis it is pretty safe to conclude that the official narrative about what happened on Thursday 18

th during the

evening, and leading into the small hours of Friday 19th is completely

made up bollox; just like everything else we’re told happened in this sorry saga. Jahar was not on the run, because he had committed no crime. He was probably removed from his room by force at some point during the late afternoon/evening of Thursday 18

th April 2013, or he was

lured out. My guess is that he and Tamerlan were being ‘taken care of’ by the Masonic suits sometime after 4 p.m when Jahar was last seen by Robel [when he said he had to go somewhere] and before 5 p.m ish when their faces would be on the telly on FBI ‘wanted’ posters. Isn’t it funny that the masons have no problems publishing the days and times of Jahar’s movements at Maple Ridge Hall – the dorm he stayed in the year prior to the bombings https://www.scribd.com/doc/297035876/Ex-3125-2012-UMass-Access-Logs and they have no hesitation publishing Jahar’s texts [including the

times sent] for 6th November 2012

https://www.scribd.com/doc/297039532/Ex-1385-Log and Christmas day 2012 https://www.scribd.com/doc/297039526/Ex-1387-12-25-2013-Jahar-texts and 28

th January 2013 https://www.scribd.com/doc/297039508/Ex-1395-

Texts-Logs; and they can publish email exchanges [also showing all the times sent] between Jahar and Tamerlan from 1

st November 2011 to 21

st

March 2013 https://www.scribd.com/doc/297036447/Ex-3316-001-Tsarnaev-Emails They can even show us the searches Jahar made on the marathon bombings, including the dates and times https://www.scribd.com/doc/297036403/Ex-3303-06e-Jahar-Searches-for-Boston-Exp See also https://www.scribd.com/collections/15514074/Trial-Exhibits and https://www.justice.gov/usao-ma/tsarnaev-exhibits-day-13

Back to janus-faced John Walker, and his mind blowing BS: I learned later, but not too much later [notice Masonic stooge Siegmann doesn’t ask for a time] we received a report on campus from the campus technology infrastructure [notice no name of university official is given! Everyone at that university was too principled or embarrassed to go along with this tsunami of shite. On second thoughts, I take that back; if any of the Uni authorities had a conscience they would be exposing this outrageous sham] that at 6:19 a.m. on the morning of Friday, April 19, that Tsarnaev had logged onto the system on campus. Yeah course he fukkin did. Notice he gives a specific time there, which makes us think this must be true. Course he doesn’t show the evidence for that; and he isn’t asked for any. Further down his testimony – p 150 – he tells Stahl that he came in receipt of that information 6 hours later i.e. around noon. Now take a look at the Q & A on p 154: “were you in charge of this part of the investigation by that time? A. What part? Q. The Carriage Drive part. A. I was the senior and one of very few FBI Agents in that region. So, yes, I was working with the unified command, speaking for the FBI.” So why did he not know soon after 6:19 that Jahar had logged onto a computer system??? Did the University not tell the FBI? Why wasn’t that established? While I was determining whether that logon was remote [how could you log in to university if you weren’t physically present?] or was -- would suggest that he was physically present on campus, I received a second report from campus authorities that he logged on [my arse; if such reports existed they’d be FBI exhibits, and they’d be published. Notice Sieg Heil just accepts his bullshit; no questions asked] and was thought to be physically present on campus at 6:21 a.m.

that Friday.” This just takes piss-taking to new levels – we’re given another specific time ... that Jahar was thought to have been on campus. This story is beyond farcical - Jahar kills a cop, takes a chink hostage, shoots at a few more policemen, chucks a pressure cooker and a few bombs their way, mows down his brother, ploughs through a police barricade, races off in a stolen SUV, abandons the Merc and – bleeding profusely and close to death - hot foots it somewhere, finds his way [a few hours later] to his Uni campus [or did he? No-one bothered to establish that; maybe he just twiddled his thumbs until 6:19 a.m whereby he logged onto his Uni campus] and eventually ends up climbing into David Henneberry’s boat, leaving a trail of blood in his wake. Phew; that’s one helluva night. Meanwhile thousands of heavily armed well-intentioned police, under orders from their evil superiors, and oblivious to the fact they were being paid to take part in a deeply sinister play act [psy-op] searched for the elusive terrorist, unaware that he had already been well and truly taken care of by their Satanic Masonic bosses. So why did the fact that Jahar logged onto the University campus system at 6:19 a.m on Friday 19

th April 2013, and was thought to have

been on the campus at 6:21 a.m not deserve a mention at his trial? Why was no university official asked to give evidence? And how come the ‘Justice for Jahar’ voices are silent about that? Before 7 a.m the media knew that Ruslan Tsarni is the uncle of the Tsarnaev brothers https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=by_CJrD7r_c [6:10 mins of video.] Robel says that Azamat saw a photo of himself and Jahar at about 7 a.m on a ‘news’ website https://cbsboston.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/document44.pdf [p 7.] So if the media knew who Jahar’s family and closest friends were, why didn’t the FBI? Why did it take until 9 a.m for them to figure out Dias’ identity? Course the truth is, the Masonic controlled FBI knew who Jahar’s friends were - and knew everything they needed to know about them - long before the bombing. The same conspirators [masons in high places] who fitted up the Tsarnaevs, also fitted up their friends. [Tamerlan’s friend Khairullozhon Matanov is another innocent fall guy in this hugely sophisticated whopper of a psy-op. As said I’ll cover all the friends in more detail in another pdf.] More on the Tsarni snake in the grass in my pdf ‘The [censored] House Homeland Security Committee report’. http://sharonkilby.co.uk/site/THE_[CENSORED]_HOUSE_HOMELAND_

SECURITY_COMMITTEE_REPORT_dated_March_2014_entitled_The_Road_to_Boston.php Wanking Walker wants you to believe that he and his clown gang went out that morning [time unspecified] to talk to everyone they thought knew Jahar. When asked by Stahl [on p 153]: “And then you have information from a number of students that Jahar was friends with some of the people in that apartment?” he replies vaguely: “Likely only one by the time that you described. Likely? Why can he not be certain? Several later in the afternoon.” Several? Why does he not know how many? When asked to clarify he says: “We had probably [so he’s not really sure] only received collectively information from a single friend of Tsarnaev. We were interviewing many associating Carriage Drive to Tsarnaev. During the course of the afternoon we heard from several others, the last of whom was the defendant Phillipos.” He’s only able to name three more - Israpele Vekabov, Greg Mazlan and Sigar Rei when questioned later by Wooldridge https://jimmysllama.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/tazhayakov-motion-hearing-day-two.pdf [p 92.] He can’t be specific and say who was interviewing who, when these interviews took place and where, but he does want everyone to know that “we were instructed to do things in a manner that we don't normally do, for instance, telephoning ahead before knocking on a door, if you will.” [p 91 of ‘Day one of motion hearing.’] L.O.L this guy just keeps oozing shit like an elephant on laxatives. On page 106 Walker tells the court that he and the FBI firmly believed that Jahar was in the home of Aza and Dias - 69A Carriage Drive. I wonder at what point the prick decided Jahar wasn’t at UMass, but was instead in his friends’ apartment. And what time did the fumbling FBI farts finally get to interview Jahar’s friends? Walker again: “I started speaking with Ms. Kumaskali [Dias’ girlfriend] at approximately 5:15; I started speaking with Mr. Tazhayakov at approximately 5:20; and I started speaking with Mr. Kadyrbayev at about 5:25 p.m.” [P 118.] This was after they’d been terrorized in their apartment, threatened with being shot, and ordered out with instructions delivered through a loudspeaker. In Dias’ ‘POST-SUPPRESSION HEARING MEMORANDUM’ on page 28: “Dias testified that he was forced to take his shirt off, drop his pants, and he was brought to the ground on his knees so that he could be cuffed, as questions were shouted at him.” Azamat was also shirtless and cuffed https://jimmysllama.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/tazhayakov-motion-hearing-

day-two.pdf [p98.] The purpose of this outrageous overbearing and humiliating unjust charade is the same as the reason for the Boston lockdown – to keep the populace under control, through fear. The men in their secret societies are reinforcing the message that the all-powerful State can do whatever it wants, using any excuse, even if that excuse is based on a lie i.e. a psy-op; that there is no such thing anymore [even in America – the land of the free] as human rights ... they’re gradually getting you used to [and even welcoming] your impending NWO enslavement. The cointelpros are telling the genuine voices against injustice and the NWO that there is nothing anyone can do about it. So if these three friends of Jahar’s are such a threat to the USA that they needed to be locked up for years, with orders for the two Non-US citizens to be deported on release, why wasn’t Andrew Dwinells treated the same way? Why wasn’t he arrested, cuffed, stripped and charged? After all, if these defendants are criminals, then Dwinells is an aider and abettor, since he [so we’re told] let Jahar’s friends into the room he shared with Jahar, and watched as Dias went through Jahar’s stuff. And since the FBI would not have known at that stage what – if anything - Dwinells knew about the marathon bombing beforehand, or if he’d taken anything of Jahar’s, and disposed of some ‘evidence’, surely they would have been very interested in him? So why did he get kid glove treatment? This is especially so as he too failed to notify the authorities of Jahar’s identity. Have a read of his testimony: https://jimmysllama.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/tazhayakov-trial-transcript-day-6.pdf EXCERPT FROM DAY SIX OF JURY TRIAL TESTIMONY OF ANDREW

DWINELLS and https://jimmysllama.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/tazhayakov-trial-transcript-day-7.pdf EXCERPT FROM DAY SEVEN OF JURY TRIAL CONTINUED TESTIMONY OF

ANDREW DWINELLS Here’s a video of Dwinells walking with his pals http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2684907/Ex-roommate-Tsarnaev-normal-bombings.html He testifies that at approximately 10 p.m [based on his recollection that he’d been writing an essay for around 3 hours from 7 p.m ish] on Thursay 18

th April, Jahar’s, ‘move in’ friend [Dias] approached him, and

asked to be let into his and Jahar’s room. Dwinells claims not to know the name of ‘move in’ friend. I find that hard to believe, since, as Dwinells says, Dias had “hung out with Jahar in the room on multiple occasions.” He’d been in there three or four times a week [see p 5 of his continued testimony.] Astonishingly he even tells Azamat’s lawyer Diane Ferrone [on p 24] that - by July 8

th 2014 i.e. nearly one year and

three months on - he’s still not sure of Dias’ name. Yeah; pull the other one! He’s only testifying in a high profile case, which happens to be in connection with the bloodiest terror attack on the USA since 9/11, and he wants you to believe he doesn’t know one of the defendants’ names! Dwinells also says that he was in the common room with his friend Steven Poulliot. Why wasn’t Poulliot interviewed by the FBI? Dwinells says that during the time Dias was looking for something, he showed Dwinells a text which had allegedly been sent from Jahar. When asked by government attorney John A.Capin “What do you recall the text saying?” He says “The text said something about Jahar leaving the country and he won't be back so he can go in and take what he wants.” That does not ring true. The text said ‘something’ about? Why would such vital information as what was stated in a text from a suspect bomber be left to a witness’ recollection, especially as that recollection was nearly one year and three months after the alleged event; also bearing in mind there were three defendants in court charged with crimes that could have seen them banged up for as long as 25 years??? Why isn’t that text a government exhibit? Why did Capin, nor the judge, nor any other lawyer want to know exactly what was stated by Jahar, and at what time said text was sent??? Where else is there mention of Jahar saying he was leaving the country? Where is the evidence Jahar sent Dias a text on that day, with words to that effect? Why would Jahar send such a text when he’d done nothing wrong? There is no evidence that he didn’t intend to return to his dorm; and there is absolutely no evidence that he planned to leave the country. The Q & A that follows on p 11 is: “Q. At any point, did you see this move-in friend use his phone to send a text message himself? A. I believe he was texting while in the room, yes. Q. After he texted -- did he text shortly after getting to the room? A. Yeah, within a couple minutes. Q. After he texted, did anybody else show up in the room? A. Within 10 minutes of entering the room, some more people came in, two more.” So according to Dwinells this text exchange was going on just after 10 p.m, and it was happening before the other two friends – Azamat and Robel allegedly turned up. According to lead prosecutor William Weinreb in his opening statement at Jahar’s kangaroo trial: “A few hours later, at 8:45 p.m the defendant [Jahar] got a text from his good friend, Dias Kadyrbayev. Dias texted, "You saw the news?" The defendant texted back, "Yeah, bro, I did." Dias texted, "For real?" The defendant

texted back, "I saw the news. Better not text me, my friend. LOL." Dias texted, "You saw yourself in there?" The defendant didn't answer directly. He just texted back, "If you want, you can go to my room and take what's there."” http://thebostonmarathonbombings.weebly.com/uploads/2/4/2/6/24264849/1528_day_27_march_4_2015.pdf [p 36.] That text exchange is not an FBI exhibit. Why? In the indictment against Jahar it is stated that Jahar “sent a text message to a college classmate and close friend that read, “If you want u can go to my room and take what you want.” https://www.justice.gov/iso/opa/resources/378201362714364690711.pdf [p 9.] According to FBI Special Agent Scott P Cieplik’s ‘CRIMINAL COMPLAINT’ affidavit, “An analysis of KADYRBAYEV’s cell phone reflects that these texts were sent on April 18

th 2013 between 8:43 p.m

and 8:48 p.m. EST.” https://www.justice.gov/iso/opa/resources/84201351145736289761.pdf [p 9.] So if Cieplik isn’t lying, that exposes Andrew Dwinells as a liar. Actually both Cieplik and Dwinells are liars. More on Cieplik in my main BB psy-op pdf. Now notice Cieplik doesn’t state what was said in those text messages. All he does is give a brief outline of what the three defendants are alleged to have told their interrogators. For example, I quote from page 9 [from what he says is a summary of Dias’ statements]: “Kadyrbayev then texted Tsarnaev and told him that he looked like the suspect on television. Tsarnaev’s return texts contained “lol” and other things Kadyrbayev interpreted as jokes such as “you better not text me” and “come to my room and take whatever you want”.” Another example is from Aza’s alleged statements: “Before they went in KADYRBAYEV showed TAZHAYAKOV a text message from Tsarnaev that stated, “I’m about to leave if you need something in my room take it.” [P 11.] Cieplik was able to give the date and time of said texts, so why couldn’t he quote verbatim the messages? Because he is lying – there were no such texts. If his ‘CRIMINAL COMPLAINT’ was genuine he would have quoted the exact words of all pertinent text messages, and he would have also stated the date and time of said texts. This information would have been obtained and logged by the interviewing agents [if of course this was a genuine investigation, and not a Masonic conspired psy-op.]

He would also have specified the times Dias was interviewed [he just says it was on the 19

th and 20

th April], and he would have named the

interviewing agents. This of course applies to Aza and Robel too. Now according to Cieplik the account Dias gave to the Feds is that on April 18

th he, Aza and Robel went to Jahar’s room between

approximately 6:00 p.m and 7:00 p.m whereby they were let in by Dwinells. That of course contradicts Dwinells’ testimony [he says it was 10 p.m ish and that they did not arrive together.] Course if the three friends were there sometime before 7:00 p.m collecting Jahar’s backpack, laptop etc Dias would not have been having a text exchange with Jahar at 8:45 p.m telling him to go and take what he wanted! Why didn’t Dias’ lawyers raise issue over that little anomaly? They don’t even mention it. Neither does anyone else. Also according to Cieplik Dias recalls dumping the backpack at approximately 10:00 p.m [page 10 of his affidavit.] That of course contradicts Dwinells’ account, but it also contradicts Dias’ girlfriend Bayan Kumiskali’s testimony. According to Aza’s lawyer she told the court that Dias left 69A Carriage Drive from 9:21 p.m, and returned at approximately 10:47 p.m. on April 18, 2013. http://thebostonmarathonbombings.weebly.com/uploads/2/4/2/6/24264849/azamat_aquital.pdf [P5.] Dias’ lawyers don’t mention that contradiction either. Further Cieplik says that Aza told the Feds an altogether different account. Aza supposedly told them that he Dias and Robel all turned up at Jahar’s at some unspecified time after 9:00 p.m [he was said to be out shopping at 9:00 p.m ish.] Also according to Cieplik Aza says it was sometime after 6:00 am on Friday 19

th that Dias decided to dump the

backpack, and that Aza agreed with that decision. This contradicts Bayan’s testimony; she says that only she and Dias discussed the backpack and what was to be done with it. I’ll discuss Robel’s alleged statements in more detail in a minute. Notice you don’t see the so-called ‘alternative media’ questioning why all the lawyers failed their clients on the most basic of points. In fact have you seen anyone in the ‘A/M’ question any of the lawyers? Nah, me neither. The fact that none of the FBI agents are able to prove what they were allegedly told is true, the fact that there are so many contradictions of what allegedly happened during the evening of April 18

th, the fact that

there is absolutely no evidence that any of the friends were even at Jahar’s at any time during that evening should have been enough for all charges against these three defendants to be thrown out. The fact that they weren’t tells you the allegations are Masonic concoctions i.e. that all three friends were fitted up on trumped up charges. Take a look at this transcript http://thebostonmarathonbombings.weebly.com/uploads/2/4/2/6/24264849/1560_day_37_march_23_2015.pdf whereby supervisory special agent for the FBI Kevin Swindon is under cross. Chakrafarty states that only a redacted version of that all important text exchange between Dias and Jahar was admitted into evidence. [That would be a redacted version of a fabricated conversation!] I quote that version: "I saw the news? Better not text me, my friend. If you want, you can go to my room and take what's there, Smiley face, Bro, salaam alaikum." [P 11.] According to Robel’s attorney Derege Demissie on page 6 of this motion https://jimmysllama.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/phillipos-motion-to-dismiss-4-11-14.pdf “Mr Tsarnaev confirmed that on April 18

th, he

contacted some unnamed friends [time unspecified] to give away his laptop and other items in his dorm room because he did not expect to survive.” Incidentally it looks like Demissie copied that from a statement which was written by FBI agents based [and very loosely it would appear] on an interview of Jahar. [I say that because we have no idea how much of those statements are the truth – probably the redacted bits – how much is coerced confession, and how much is completely made up.] https://cbsboston.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/document44.pdf

[See Exhibit 6.] More on these exhibits further down.

So there is a contradiction in the time that said alleged text exchange took place, and there are a number of contradictions of what was allegedly said. Why did all the so-called defence lawyers for all three defendants - Robert G. Stahl https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tExZrfYt-cU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Taowm_oUiMs and Laura K. Gasiorowski for Dias, Nicholas Wooldridge https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfg8HO0LMkA Matthew Myers and Diane Ferrone for Azamat, and Derege Demissie and Susan Church for Robel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SelzGtv3ktI fail to even mention the fact there is no evidence that such a text exchange occurred??? Why did none of these ‘defence’ lawyers ask the FBI for the records of these text messages? I’ll answer that; it’s because that

would be a genuine defence of their clients, which was not allowed. All these lawyers, remember, are taking part in a Masonic psy-op, and therefore are only pretending to defend their clients. Their job is to assist in the stitch up of these friends. They are colluding with the ‘opposition’. Notice Ferrone makes a big deal - by way of a photograph which she introduces into evidence - of proving that her client, Aza, is not the person who approached Dwinells to gain entry to the room [see p 24 onwards] yet she doesn’t give a fig about the lack of hard evidence, such as alleged text messages. And notice how Ferrone protects Dwinells from being accused of failing to call authorities to inform them of Jahar’s identity, by failing to get clarification of what exactly was stated in that text exchange, and especially of what Jahar had said in his first text to Dias [that is after establishing the proof that such a text exchange occurred!] Instead she skirts around the issue, asking him [p 7 of his continued testimony]: “The text message didn't say, "I'm the Boston Marathon bomber. Come to my room and take stuff," did it?” and “And when you saw that text message that Dias showed to you, you didn't think, Wow, Jahar is admitting guilt to being the Boston Marathon bomber, did you? In fact, you thought it meant just what it said, Jahar was leaving, and if Dias wanted, he can come and take whatever he wanted from the room?” There is no problem having a picture of Dwinells’ wire cutters and wires exhibited though! The masons just love taking the piss; don’t they. [The cutters and wires were part of Dwinells’ engineering kit, and were seized by the FBI when they searched his dorm room; so we’re told. Course they didn’t really search his room. That’s just part of the pretence. And Andrew Dwinells is ‘in’ on the sham.] Dwinells goes on to say [page 20 onwards] that when the friends were done, he left with them. He says it was 10:39 p.m. He says the reason he could be specific about that time is because it was when he had sent a text to Jahar, which he’d looked at recently. Again, why is that text not an exhibit? Why does Dwinells still have it in his possession? Surely the FBI should have seized it. Why did none of the ‘defence’ lawyers question exactly what was stated in that text? [Ferrone just says “And it said something like, "Hey, your friend said you left"?” [P 12.] So he sends a text to Jahar after telling Pouliott that these three friends of Jahar’s were acting suspiciously [p 11 of his continued testimony]; he doesn’t get a reply. He confirms to Capin that he believed the FBI were

looking for Jahar as the bomber [p 23], so why didn’t he contact police and tell them Jahar was his roommate? Notice he was not asked that question. Notice he wasn’t asked to give a rough time of when he saw Jahar on the ‘news’. So, I ask again, if Jahar’s friends were charged with aiding and abetting, why wasn’t Dwinells? He was effectively protecting a suspect terrorist with his silence. He too could have prevented the deaths of Sean Collier and Tamerlan; he could’ve prevented the Boston lockdown, the chink being carjacked ... The answer to that is of course is Dwinells is just another contemptible sell out; happy to do his Masonic handler’s bidding. As for the equally despicable gang of attorneys, the question they should have been asking was: why did the FBI pretend that they didn’t know who the Tsarnaev brothers were, when clearly they did? When Dwinells is asked about the backpack [page 19 of ‘EXCERPT FROM DAY SIX’] he says Jahar had a grey one and a black one. He doesn’t

mention a plaid one. Why do none of the ‘defence’ lawyers even mention the fact there are two FBI exhibits of the backpack which was dumped, let alone raise issue over it? From all the court papers I’ve read in connection with these three friends no-one even mentions the plaid backpack. Dwinells directly contradicts himself, saying [p 19] that he didn’t

believe he’d seen any of the three men in the room on April 18th touch

Jahar’s backpack; and then saying [p 7 of his continued testimony] that he saw Dias go through a black backpack on the dorm floor. So did Dias touch Jahar’s backpack or didn’t he? Why did none of the lawyers pick him up on that glaring contradiction? And was it a black backpack or a plaid one? Why did none of the lawyers question that anomaly? So Dwinells is a proven liar, yet doesn’t get charged by the FBI. Robel does bird for lying, yet has not been proven to have lied about anything! Course it goes without saying that the so-called ‘alternative media’ do not point out the stuff I do. Why? Cos they too are working for the all-powerful evil Masonic powers. Now have a read of page 14 of Dwinells’ continued testimony. Ferrone asks him if he recalls being interviewed by the police [I think you’d remember being interviewed by police!] on Friday 19

th April. Why did

she not ask him the time of that interview? He confirms that the

interview was at a police office [shouldn’t that be station?] and that an unnamed FBI agent was present. Agent Wanker tells Wooldridge that he spoke to Dwinells “initially in the Chief's Office of the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth Police Station. I later spoke with him inside his dormitory room and thereafter in different locations.” Why couldn’t he specify where exactly these locations were? Why wasn’t he asked to be more specific? https://jimmysllama.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/tazhayakov-motion-hearing-day-two.pdf [p 93.] He confirms that the interview at the police station was on April 19

th at approximately 8:45 p.m. He says he

“continued to speak with him that evening.” Why the vagueness? Why couldn’t he say where he had continued to speak with Dwinells, and for how long? On attempting to clarify he says “The FBI or its JTTF partners spoke with the roommate [why did he not know if it was someone from the FBI or another organisation within the JTTF? Why did he not know who that person was? He’s supposedly the senior FBI agent working with the unified command, speaking for the FBI. He’d also had well over a year to prepare for his court testimony; so why did he not know the identity of this person?] earlier on the 19th in the Police Department [why can he not specify a time?] of UMass Dartmouth.” Why wasn’t it established at what point Dwinells was first contacted by the police? Was it before Jahar was located? Ferrone asks him if the police had asked if they could make an audio recording of the interview. Didn’t he have two interviews at the police station? Dwinells confirms that they had. Bullfuckingshit. The police do not need permission to record interviews. That is standard practice. You can be sure as eggs is eggs that no transcript of any police interview of Dwinells’ will ever see the light of day. Why? Cos there was no police interview. [Well not one in connection with Jahar.] Prove me wrong Dwinells, publish the transcript[s]. He apparently signed his consent for the police to search his room on Friday 19

th. Sure he fukkin did. So why was he not asked the time the

police searched the room? Why wasn’t he asked the duration of the search? Sweet Jesus, as if the police would need anyone’s permission to search the very room that belonged to the elusive terrorist Jahar. What if he was hiding in there?!!! Folks, the entire city of Boston is in lockdown; residents are being hauled out of their homes at gunpoint whilst SWAT teams move in and search their places ...

and the police need Andrew Dwinells’ consent to search his and Jahar’s room??? Take a look at the video here http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2313249/Boston-bomber-search-Moment-SWAT-teams-ordered-innocent-neighbors-houses-GUNPOINT.html Have a look at this video too https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lA69pQY9ldg Notice incidentally the lady getting swiftly cut off as she says at 5:30 mins approx that she can’t understand “to this day” how he [Jahar] got through the police; that the police were swamped “over there”. Also notice what the lady at 10 mins of the video is saying – she has a friend who lives on Franklin street who says that there was a huge search done of her garage, but no-one went anywhere near Henneberry’s boat, which was directly across the road from her. Dan Bidondi who works for scumbag extraordinaire Alex Jones is yet another idiot who will also one day, in the not too distant future, deeply regret shilling for freemasonry. Ferrone continues the BS, asking him to confirm that he went with the FBI to his dorm room on April 19

th. So where was his temporary

accomodation? At what point was he ordered to vacate his room? When was he allowed to return? Why didn’t she ask these questions? She asks if he recalls being accompanied by FBI Agent John Wanker. Again there is no time specified. According to agent Cieplik the FBI searched Jahar’s and Dwinells’ room on April 21

st 2013 after obtaining a search warrant. [P 8 of his

affidavit.] Er hadn’t the FBI and police already done a search on the 19

th?

In reply to Ferrone’s question: “And do you recall observing that a black backpack on Jahar's floor was in the dorm room on April 19th, when you went with the FBI?” he says he doesn’t remember. Why didn’t she reference the interviews [numerous interviews, he tells Capin] he’d done with the FBI? She makes reference to what he’d told Walker about Dias’ ‘frenetic behaviour’. Here’s the Q & A on page 10: “And do you recall telling Agent Walker of the FBI that Dias's frenetic behavior appeared to abate following his discovery of the plastic bag of marijuana? Do you recall telling Agent Walker that? A. Not right now I don't. Q. So, would Agent Walker be a liar if he took the stand ...” Why wasn’t it clarified what he had told them?

She continues: “I think you told us yesterday that you didn't recall that there was a white polo cap on Jahar's bed?” That cap, we’re told, is exhibited [see page 18 of his previous day’s testimony.] He tells Capin that he believes he’s seen Jahar wear it a couple of times. So is this the same white cap that we see Jahar wearing at the ATM, where he is supposedly helping himself to Meng’s money at 11:18 pm on the 18

th

April? Or does he have two white polo caps? If he has two white caps, why is there only one exhibit, and what is the brand of the other cap? Why was this not clarified? FBI supervisory special agent Kimberly Franks http://thebostonmarathonbombings.weebly.com/uploads/2/4/2/6/24264849/1566_day_38_march_24_2015.pdf [scroll down to p 193 for the start of her testimony] confirms that a Polo Ralph Lauren, MCMLXVII white hat [exhibit no. 1231 apparently, but I can’t find that on the government list of exhibits] was found on Jahar’s bed, and that it is the same one that Jahar was wearing on Marathon day. If that cap was the one he was wearing on the late evening of the 18

th, how did it come to be back at the

dorm? [There is no suggestion that the brothers returned to Jahar’s place in between the time the chink pegged it to safety and the time the Tsarnaevs were allegedly shooting at police men.] If it is not the same cap, why was it never established what happened to the one he was wearing at the ATM? [Jahar is seen in the Shell convenience store with his hoodie on, and he is seen climbing out of the boat [so we’re told] with no hat on.] No white cap was found on Laurel Street or in the stolen SUV or Jahar’s Honda or in Henneberry’s boat ... so what happened to it? I’ve looked all over for a government exhibit of his white cap[s], and can’t even find one exhibit. There is however an exhibit of the ATM $800.00 withdrawal Jahar allegedly made exh_769.pdf But, hold on, that withdrawal was made on 19

th April 2013; Jahar was supposed

to have made that withdrawal on the 18th

of April. There is also an exhibit exh_768.pdf which shows that that withdrawal was made on the 18

th April. So which is the correct one? Exh 769 looks like a genuine

statement, as it shows other transactions, and also the balance of the account prior to the $800.00 withdrawal, and afterwards [and even taking into account the 1cent deduction]; exh 768 shows what looks like two $800.00 withdrawals on 18

th April – one at 23:19 and one at 23:20,

which can’t be right; it also shows a balance of $1516.57, which doesn’t take into account the 1 cent deduction which occurred on 18

th April. So

have the masons been manipulating the evidence again? https://www.justice.gov/usao-ma/tsarnaev-exhibits-day-6

And while we’re on the subject of Jahar’s infamous white cap, what about Tamerlan’s black cap? What happened to that? He is seen at the doorway of the convenience store in a white cap. There is no explanation of whether or not that is Jahar’s cap; there is no mention of Tam’s black cap, no exhibit of it ... Come to think of it there are no exhibits of any of Tamerlan’s clothes. WTF? Why are the lawyers and the media and the so-called ‘justice for Jahar’ voices silent on these vitally important issues? Take a look at p 19 of Dwinells’ continued testimony. I quote: “MR. CAPIN: The other, your Honor, was referred to as "151T," but should have been 151R, and that's a photograph of the white hat. THE COURT: So the record is clear, I hope, what was referenced yesterday as "151T" is, in fact, 151R, and what was referenced yesterday as "151B" is actually 151A. (Exhibit No. 151A received into evidence) (Exhibit No. 151R received into evidence) Now, ladies and gentlemen, that may sound like obsessive-compulsive disorder of being applied to the record in the case, but it illustrates something that I have emphasized all along. We want to be clear as to what you have been exposed to in this case so that the case can be evaluated in terms of the evidence that actually was introduced here, and so sometimes we take a little bit of time to clarify what the record is, even on what seemingly is a modest issue, and that is why I took a bit of time this morning, because we identified some variance yesterday.” Laugh out fukkin loud. Where is the clarity on the caps? Where is it on the dumped backpack – was it plaid, black, or both? Judge Woodcock is in a class of his own in the piss taking department. According to http://www.wbur.org/news/2015/06/05/tazhayakov-friend-tsarnaev-sentenced “The judge [Woodcock] said their crimes were still

severe because they impeded an investigation into a terror attack at a time when investigators were trying to determine the identities of the bombers.” Breathtaking hypocrisy. And is there any clarification on the backpack from FBI Special Agent Ken Benton? Er no, he is yet another bold faced liar who got away with committing perjury at Jahar’s kangaroo trial. Scroll down to p 133 here http://thebostonmarathonbombings.weebly.com/uploads/2/4/2/6/24264849/1567_day_39_march_25_2015.pdf I copy/paste the start of his cross by Mellin: “And based on information that you received from an associate of the defendant [that associate is Dias; why didn’t Mellin

name him?], did you proceed to the Crapo Landfill to attempt to recover a backpack associated with the defendant that had been thrown into the trash from 69A Carriage Drive in New Bedford, Mass.? A. Yes.” Yet when later asked by Miriam Conrad to confirm that “The information that you got that led you to that landfill, was that a friend of Mr. Tsarnaev's had gone to his room, his dorm room, and removed that backpack? That is, a friend removed the backpack, correct?” he replies that “At that time I did not know that.” [P 144.] Why didn’t Miriam Conrad pick him up on the fact that he’d just told Mellin that it was precisely because he’d got information from Dias that led him to search the landfill? She just ignored that glaring contradiction and goes on to ask if he’d come to learn that. I quote the Q & A: “Q. Did you come to learn that? A. Yes, I did. Q. And that friend [Dias – why the mystery?] is the one who placed that backpack in a black plastic bag and then into a Dumpster, right? A. Correct.” And under re-direct [L.O.L] by Mellin who doesn’t question Benton’s contradictory testimony either, and ignores what he was previously told, doesn’t question Benton’s answer that he “heard that later” when he later asks [p 147]: “Did you have information that a friend [Dias] of the defendant had collected the belongings of the defendant to put in that backpack?” Fer cryin’ out loud, Benton had informed Mellin that he’d got his information from Dias. You really couldn’t make this shit up. Course none of the slimeball lawyers think to ask him if that interview was recorded or if he’d written a report. And since Benton had spoken to Dias, why was he unable to find out when Dias had dumped the backpack on the dumpster? [He can only give a vague reply to Miriam Conrad [p 145] that “It was either Thursday night or Friday” when asked to confirm that the backpack was placed in the dumpster on Friday April 19

th.]

Aza’s lawyer Nicholas Wooldridge makes a contradictory statement when he says on p 26 of http://thebostonmarathonbombings.weebly.com/uploads/2/4/2/6/24264849/azamat_aquital.pdf “What the trial record clearly established, and which was discussed in detail above, was that Dias was the person who actually took the backpack containing the aforementioned items from Dzhokhar’s dorm room. Additionally, Andrew Dwinells testified that he saw one person take one item, the headphones.” So he says Dias was the person who removed the backpack; however he also points out that Dwinells makes clear that he didn’t see anything being

removed, [except for the headphones, which belonged to Aza.] That aside Wooldridge lies when he says the ‘trial record’ established Dias took the backpack. I’d like him to show us the evidence for that. I’d like him to show the evidence that Dias or any of Jahar’s friends were even at Jahar’s dorm room on the evening of April 18

th. His ‘defence’ of his

client is that Aza was just ‘there’. That is no defence. It is a betrayal. Wooldridge lies when he says: “The evidence presented at trial was that Dias, independently, went and found Dzhokhar’s roommate, Andrew Dwinells, and sought access to the dorm room alone.” That has not been proven. How can it have been when there are so many contradictions, and when Dwinells has been exposed as a liar by the FBI log of the time of the Jahar/Dias text exchange [according to agent Cieplik]? Wooldridge exposes another contradiction of an already conflicting account in the storyline on page 18: “The evidence adduced at trial [Where?] was that Azamat received a text message from Dias to come pick Dias up at the apartment on 69 Carriage Drive. Azamat received the text message at approximately 9:00 p.m., well after Dias had engaged in a text exchange with Dzokhar outside of Azamat’s presence.” Why doesn’t he specify the time of that Jahar/Dias text exchange? To recap, according to Dwinells that text exchange was just after 10 p.m which would mean that the text Aza allegedly received from Dias was not well after the Dias/Jahar text exchange. But if there was an exchange of texts between Dias and Jahar at 8:45 p.m [as stated by Weinreb and Cieplik] then Aza’s alleged text from Dias at 9:00 p.m would indeed have been afterwards; but not well after. Once again we might ask what exactly is stated in that text – the one Aza allegedly received from Dias. And, most importantly, why is there no exhibit of it? Once again I’ll tell you the answer – it’s because there was no such text. That fact is confirmed by the dumbass Wooldridge himself, when he exposes himself as a liar, as he also claims that Azamat’s phone was not working on that day. I quote the footnote from page 18: “Additionally the Government’s own witnesses testified that Azamat cell phone service was not working at the time.” See also page 35, Wooldridge says: “On April 18, 2013, Azamat’s cell phone was shut off, he could not receive telephone calls.”

So if Aza’s phone was out of action on that day, how was he able to have a text exchange with Robel? I quote from page 5: “During Dias’ text exchange with Dzhokhar, Azamat was at the Gymnasium exercising. While at the Gym and prior to Robel informing Dias of Dzhokhar being a Boston Bombing suspect, Azamat exchanged text messages with Robel about getting together later that evening.” And how was he able to receive a text from Dias summoning him to Dias’ apartment? Notice incidentally that Wooldridge makes references to trial exhibits of these alleged texts. Well he can’t have it both ways, either those text exchanges of Aza’s did occur [and are evidenced in the government exhibits] or Aza’s phone was cut off, and therefore he couldn’t possibly have been texting that day. Either way Wooldridge has revealed himself to be an outright blatant filthy liar. Now take a look at these seven exhibits https://cbsboston.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/document44.pdf See also my observations on them http://sharonkilby.co.uk/site/EXHIBIT_CHART_-_my_observations.php Robel was interviewed first by Task Force Officer David Earle and Special Agent Dwight Schwader. He was then interviewed by Special Agents Timothy J Quinn and Michael H Sieland. [P 12 of the pdf.] Robel says that at approximately 4 p.m he and Azamat were driven by Jahar in Jahar’s car to 69 Carriage Drive, whereby Azamat was dropped off. This is confirmed by Aza [see p 117 of https://jimmysllama.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/tazhayakov-motion-hearing-transcript-day-one.pdf] Robel says that from 7 p.m onwards he was with Azamat at 69 Carriage Drive the whole time on April 18

th through to Friday morning. He says Dias was with his

girlfriend Bayan in Dias’ bedroom the whole time. Robel says he slept from 8 p.m to 10 p.m, and that from 10 p.m to 4 a.m he and Azamat watched the ‘news’ on TV. [P 7.] On seeing Jahar was the suspect bomber they were shocked and “texted TSARNAEV but the text would not go through.” I quoted that bit as this account is written by FBI agents and is devoid of detail. Why did the ‘defence’ lawyers not find out who had sent one or more texts to Jahar – was it both Robel and Aza or was it just Robel? Why did they not find out the time one or more texts were sent? Why did they not find out what exactly was stated in the text[s] sent? Why did they not question why any text sent to Jahar by any of his friends on Thursday evening/Friday morning was not exhibited?

As for the text not going through, we’re told the reason for that was an unpaid phone bill [see Exhibit 3 ‘page 7 of 10’. See also page 6 of http://ftpcontent2.worldnow.com/whdh/pdf/150529-kadyrbayev-collier.pdf]. I’d say the real reason was because whoever had taken Jahar and Tamerlan captive had taken control of their phones. I’d also say that those texts were genuine ones; also that they were sent sometime after 11 p.m on Thursday 18

th.

If we take a look at the telephone records that are published exh_1172.pdf

[Jahar’s phone ends 9151, Tamerlan’s phone ends 4634] we see that Jahar’s phone was in use on 18

th April and that calls were made at

8:17p.m and at 11:01 p.m. That is not to say that it was actually Jahar and Tam who were using those phones at that time; we have no way of knowing that. So the idea that Jahar’s phone was cut off that day appears to be just another lie. We might ask how the texts that we’re told occurred between Jahar and Dias managed to go through if Jahar’s phone was cut off! And what are the chances anyway that both Jahar’s and Aza’s phones would be cut off; and especially on that day, of all days?! Course we’re not told the time that those phones were disconnected. Robel says he started receiving texts from classmates. Why did none of the lawyers want details surrounding those texts – the names of classmates who had sent them, the times the texts were sent, what exactly is stated in those texts ...? Why did they not inquire why there are no exhibits of those texts? And why did none of the lawyers want to know whether or not Robel or Aza had replied to said texts? They almost certainly would have done.

These texts are vital evidence that would have shone some light on the timeline and could have proven that none of these defendants were even at Jahar’s on Thursday evening. But proving that was absolutely not what any of these lawyers were paid to do. On page 10 of the pdf we’re told that Robel changed his story. Robel’s lawyers contend that he was bullied into doing so. Demissie says in his ‘Motion to dismiss’ https://jimmysllama.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/phillipos-motion-to-dismiss-4-11-14.pdf: “the government approached the defendant several times, waited for him outside his home, took him to random parking lots, and even confronted him at 4 am.” [P 13.] Course if Robel [and his friends] hadn’t been coerced, the FBI would have been happy to prove everything was above board – they would have recorded [and published] all interviews, which would have been done in a proper setting. The fact that there are only reports which we’re told were drafted from memory, days later, [termed 302s, which I will discuss later in more detail] tells you these young men were fitted up. This is only an investigation into the friends of the most wanted terrorist in the USA, don’t forget. Put it this way if you or I were wanted for questioning by the FBI, you can rest assured that our interviews absolutely would be recorded. Put it another way, when a crime is committed by the Masonic elite, as part of a psy-op, there will never be any recordings of any police/FBI interviews of the patsies. When ‘statements’ are written up later, by the Masonic conspirators, information can be altered and fabricated to suit the trumped up charges. In a psy-op the masons have to guard against their agents cocking up and buggering up the script. They knew that there would be a demand for publication of such interviews; so they didn’t record any; simple. It then boils down to the word of experienced and erudite law-enforcement officials, government lawyers and well-rehearsed ‘witnesses’ [Masonic puppets] against the word of frightened intimidated and bewildered young victims; who will have been advised to ‘leave it to the lawyers’ or they could be doing porridge for up to 25 years. Job’s a good un. Incidentally, notice this ‘motion to dismiss’ is a jimmysllama file, could that mean that the person hiding behind the jimmyshillama handle is Derege Demissie? It would not surprise me. More on jimmy shill in my ‘JIMMYSLLAMA’ pdf. http://sharonkilby.co.uk/site/JIMMYSLLAMA.php I couldn’t help smiling wryly when I heard the cheeky monkey Susan Church saying the moral of the story is don’t talk to the FBI unless you have a lawyer present https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=grBq15VT6gA

She is in cahoots with them. She and they are paid to protect the official narrative, and in the doing she has to sacrifice her client. She and all her fellow lawyers of course know that if they were to genuinely defend their clients they would have to take on very powerful freemasons; that of course means they’d be committing career suicide [or worse i.e. they could be ‘suicided’.] Why would any of them put themselves at risk when they live very comfortable lives serving the Masonic matrix? I would like to know what Susan Church would have done different if Robel had enlisted her services at the get-go. Why did she and Demissie persuade Robel to go along with the nonsense that he was so high on weed that he could not remember what happened on the evening in question? Why didn’t they defend him with the simple truth - on the exculpatory evidence – that he was not at Jahar’s room at any time during the evening in question; that the FBI agents had provably lied about that, and that there is no evidence that he [nor the other two defendants] were in Jahar’s room on the evening of 18

th April

2013? Robel stated clearly in his initial FBI interview where he was that evening, who he was with, and what he did. His one-too-many spliffs had not affected his memory at that point. According to FBI agents Earle, Schwader, SA Douglas McDonnell and SA James Clarke who interviewed him on Saturday April 20

th at ten minutes past four in the

morning [why was it necessary to talk to him at that unsociable hour?] on Robel’s doorstep [why there?] he repeated his account. It was only because those bent FBI agents, under orders from their Masonic superiors, got heavy with him, told him he was lying [when in fact they were the ones lying], said they had several unidentified witnesses [Exhibit 3, ‘page 5 of 10’] who could prove he was lying [when that was a lie, as those witnesses - former friends of Robel’s who sold out to the Masonic powers and testified against him - did not prove Robel had lied] that we’re told he was persuaded that his memory was a little fuzzy; which was a lie. If weed had impaired his memory he would have been unsure what had happened in his first interview with FBI, and they would have reflected that in their statement. Notice his traitorous lawyers don’t point that out! Has anyone ever heard Robel say that weed had impaired his memory? I certainly haven’t. He must’ve been told by his lawyers that that was his only defence.

Demissie states in his motion [p 12; see also p 19] that Robel repeatedly told the FBI that he was so spaced out on weed that he couldn’t

remember anything: “He told agents he had been smoking marijuana essentially the entire day of April 18

th [yeah, like he’d really turn up at a

disciplinary meeting to address his weed habit stoned out of his brains! More on that in a bit] he reported smoking marijuana on five separate occasions, sometimes for multiple hours on end.” Well, once again, where is the evidence for that? We only have the word of the lying lawyers and the lying FBI agents. These skunks [ha ha pardon the pun – skunk – weed – get it] probably just made that up, and Robel was persuaded to go along with it – or face being banged up, for possibly a quarter of a century. Funny how he was so off his head that he couldn’t remember where he was on the evening in question, yet somehow he knew that neither Dias nor Aza were stoned that night! [Page 8 of the motion to dismiss.] Notice the lawyers avoid proving that the FBI agents are outright liars. And the only criticism they make is that the agents were ‘overzealous’ [p 14], and that Robel was coerced [even though they don’t actually prove that.] It is outrageous that the FBI agents did not record their interviews; which should have elicited a very harsh rebuke from the defence lawyers. Be that as it may, the lawyers should have dragged all of them over the coals on their so-called ‘recollection’ of what Robel had allegedly told them. For example take a look at Exhibit 3, which is a statement from agents Timothy Quinn and Michael Sieland based on their apparent ‘recollection’ on May 1

st 2013 of an interview they had

done with Robel on 25th April 2013. As said the fact that these FBI idiots

didn’t record the interviews [which is bad enough, especially bearing in mind remember that these are interviews of the friends of one of the two men allegedly responsible for the worst terror attack in the US since 9/11], and that they were allowed to produce a statement based on their memory of what they’d been told [a preposterous idea, and even more absurd as it was done six days later] tells you this is a Masonic conspired psy-op. I quote from ‘page 2 of 10’: “Robel recalls getting a text message from Dias sometime after he had left Jahar’s dorm room on the afternoon of April 18

th 2013. Once again why the vagueness about this text

message? The FBI do not need to rely on anyone’s recollection of texts received or sent. So why are we not given any details, and – again – why is that text not a court exhibit? Take note of when the agents state that Robel recalled getting that text – it was sometime during the afternoon. In the text message Dias requested that Robel come to Jahar’s room. Robel recalls proceeding to Jahar’s room where Robel stood outside. Robel recalls seeing Dias standing next to the door to

Jahar’s room and Azamat was with him. The three discussed whether anyone knew Jahar’s whereabouts.” On ‘page 4 of 10’ the agents say Robel “tried to look for Jahar around this time period [i.e. around 6 p.m] and that he “also may have “shot” Jahar a text.” What do these clowns mean Robel tried to look for Jahar? Why the vagueness? Where did he look? Was he alone when he looked? Again, why the vagueness over the text he may have sent? Did he or didn’t he send one? If he did, why isn’t it an exhibit? i.e. to prove that he sent it, the time he sent it, and what was stated. At the bottom of ‘page 4 of 10’ the agents say that “Robel got the previously described text message from Dias in which Dias instructed Robel to come to Jahar’s dorm room. This was around 8 p.m.” Where is the evidence for that? It would appear those FBI agents just made that up. On ‘page 5 of 10’ the agents say “While Robel, Azamat and Robel stood at the doorway to Jahar’s room.” That doesn’t make sense. I don’t know about Robel being stoned, I think these FBI halfwits were stoned writing up their statements [or more accurately their fabricated accounts.] On ‘page 6 of 10’ the “interviewing agents brought Robel’s attention to the fact that Robel could have been caught on a security camera entering Jahar’s dorm room that evening which could serve to contradict his statements about entering Jahar’s room that evening. Robel advised that the only security cameras in the dorm that he was aware of were downstairs at the front and back of the building. Furthermore Robel advised that he did not believe those cameras to be operational.” We don’t know if Robel said that. Why did the agents not establish whether or not said security cameras were operational or not on the evening of the 18

th April? Is it because

they were in fact operational, and that the footage would actually be proof positive that Robel was not at Pine Dale Hall that evening, and neither were any of Jahar’s other friends? Remember these are the words of lying colluding FBI agents who were paid to ensure the successful stitch up of Robel and Jahar’s other friends. The big question is why did none of the so-called ‘defence’ lawyers ask for the footage from those security cameras? Why didn’t they ask when those cameras were turned off? [If indeed they were.] Also on ‘page 6 of 10’ the agents state that Robel “got two text messages from Robel’s friends suggesting that agents from the FBI would be seeking to talk to Robel. The individuals who sent the aforementioned messages may have been Robel’s friends David Borden and David Fernandez.” Once again, why the vagueness? Why state may have been? Either these two Davids sent texts or they didn’t. Why could that not be established? Also, yet again, why are these texts not exhibits? On ‘page 7 of 10’ the agents state “Robel used his phone to retrieve the text message he received from Dias on the evening [notice how these FBI scumbags

slyly change what they earlier stated Robel had said – that he’d got a text from Dias during the afternoon] of April 18

th which remained saved

in Robel’s phone in which Dias instructed Robel to report to Jahar’s room. Robel advised that the message came in at 10 p.m.” Er didn’t the agents just say that Robel had got that text at 8 p.m? If you take a look at the statement Robel was eventually bullied into signing [‘page 5 of 8’ of Exhibit 4] he says, “At approximately 9 p.m I received a text from my friend Dias.” So at what time did Robel allegedly receive that text? Was it 8 p.m, 9 p.m, or 10 p.m??? On ‘page 8 of 10’ [of Exh 3] the monkey boys say “With Robel’s consent and permission [my arse. The seizing of cell phones in such an investigation is par for the course] Quinn reviewed selected text messages. Robel directed Quinn’s attention to messages that Robel exchanged with Jahar on April 17th and April 18

th 2013. In some

instances it was not possible to determine the date and/or time when each message was sent due to the fact that a time stamp did not appear.” As I’ve already pointed out, isn’t it funny how there is no problem obtaining and publishing the exact times and dates of text messages that took place prior to the marathon bombing. Notice the texts published for the 18

th April are not time stamped, however they

clearly apply to a ‘safe’ time i.e. sometime prior to the marijuana meeting which was at 1 p.m. And I’ll say it again, isn’t it strange that the [alleged] unpaid bill only affected texts from/to Jahar which occurred much later in the evening on the 18

th April!

So why didn’t Church & Demissie raise the issues/ask the questions that I’ve just done? Why didn’t they expose the FBI agents as outright lying and of twisting what Robel had told them? Because they, just like all the other lying lowlife lawyers weren’t paid to defend their clients, they were paid to assist in the frame-up of those totally innocent young men. Here’s more evidence of FBI agents blatantly lying and making things up. In Exhibit 3, ‘page 6 of 10’ SAs Quinn and Sieland say “They discussed the fact that Jahar had been praying more and attending the mosque more frequently.” Jahar’s friends obviously did not say that. Jahar had been to the mosque once only. This is confirmed by Anwar Kazmi, a member of the mosque's board of trustees. See video here http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2313270/Tamerlan-Tsarnaev-Boston-bombers-rants-mosque-non-Muslim-holidays-non-believer-MLK-Jr.html For more on the brothers’ so-called radicalisation see my pdf on the [censored] House Homeland Security Committee Report. http://sharonkilby.co.uk/site/THE_[CENSORED]_HOUSE_HOMELAND_

SECURITY_COMMITTEE_REPORT_dated_March_2014_entitled_The_Road_to_Boston.php Incidentally in Exhibit 1, ‘page 5 of 6’, we are told that numerous media sites had contacted Robel, and he had spoken to CBS. Wonder why that interview is not published anywhere; could it be because it too would show there was nothing wrong with Robel’s memory and that his account to the media is consistent with his initial account to the FBI. In fact Robel was not persuaded to change his story until after many hours of interrogation; that it wasn’t until April 25

th that the agents told Robel

what they believed happened on the evening of April 18th. [See Exhibit

3, ‘page 5 of 10’. See also p 19 of the ‘motion to dismiss’.] And it wasn’t until April 26

th during his final FBI interview that he ‘confessed’.

http://thebostonmarathonbombings.weebly.com/uploads/2/4/2/6/24264849/robel_aquittal_govt_reply.pdf [p 7.] I now quote from Exhibit 4 ‘page 4 of 8’: “Subsequent investigation determined that during the time Jahar was wanted by the FBI, he was texting friends, in particular Dias and Azamat. Once again why are we not told details of the alleged texts between Jahar and Azamat on the key dates? Why are there no exhibits of such vitally important evidence? Subsequent interviews of Dias and Azamat, who are being detained on immigration charges ...” Notice how the sly masons slip that claim in – that was for the sole purpose of sullying the reputations of these young men who are known to be of good character. According to Wooldridge: “Azamat was placed in removal proceedings for allegedly violating his student visa after UMass improperly dismissed him academically due to an error on the part of the Navitas Program in calculating his GPA. DHS did not place Azamat in removal proceedings as a result of alleged criminal conduct.” http://thebostonmarathonbombings.weebly.com/uploads/2/4/2/6/24264849/azamat_aquital.pdf [p 13.] Well we don’t know if that is true. According to Wankin Walker: “They were both overstays. Both of their F1 Student Visas had been revoked.” https://jimmysllama.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/tazhayakov-motion-hearing-transcript-day-one.pdf [P 137] and on p 99: “We knew in the mid-afternoon of Friday, April 19th that Mr. Kadyrbayev had suffered revocation of his Student Visa. His F1 Visa had been revoked, and, therefore, we knew that he was unlawfully present within the United States.” Why did it take so long to find that out? The story is that the FBI knew at 9 a.m Dias’ identity. Surely it would have been a simple

matter of checking their records on Dias, such as his A-Files. They should have known straightaway Dias’ immigration status. As always we don’t know what, if any of this is true; we don’t know if either of these students did violate their visas. What are the odds that both of them would have violated their student visas, and at exactly the same time, and at a time when they were both being questioned in connection with a very high profile suspected terrorist? Notice we’re not told any details, such as the dates their visas expired. I think we should be shown these visas. Until we see the paperwork I think we can take this claim with a pinch of salt too. According to the associated presstitutes: https://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=Tazhayakov+was+allowed+to+return+to+the+U.S.+from+Kazakhstan+in+January+despite+not+having+a+valid+student+visa&gws_rd=cr,ssl&ei=A-soWJz3OMLDgAaQh66QBQ “Tazhayakov was allowed to return to the U.S. from Kazakhstan in January despite not having a valid student visa.” Yeah ok, like the U.S just let people in without valid visas. Give me a break. Can you imagine you or I trying to get into a foreign country without a valid visa? L.O.L Scroll down to page 201 of https://jimmysllama.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/tazhayakov-motion-hearing-day-two.pdf We’re told that Dias and Aza had to be visited in order that the FBI could determine if their situation had changed, for example, if they had filed any petitions, filed for refugee status, filed for asylum ... Surely they only needed to check the files for that? S A Candice Marie Kelly, under cross from Stahl explains that there has to be follow-up questions and checks to determine whether or not a person is still out of status and arrestable. When asked if Dias or Azamat had told her that they had done any of the above, would that have been the end of it, she says it may have been. Surely that would have been a matter of checking the records, not asking them? Now let’s examine Demissie’s ‘dismiss’ motion some more. On page two Demissie says: “On April 19

th Robel contacted law enforcement

agents through a friend providing them with his contact info.” Yeah ok, so why would he need to contact police through a friend? Why the vagueness? Who is this friend? What time did he do this? How did he communicate with this friend – phone call, text, email, personal visit ...?

On page five Demissie says: “At this third interview Robel allowed the agents to photograph his cell phone, specifically the text conversation he had with Azamat and Dias as well as their contact information.” Robel allowed the agents? Do me a fukkin favour. As for that text conversation, I think Mr Demissie should tell us when this conversation took place, what exactly was stated, and he should explain why he did not get it introduced as a government exhibit. According to the FBI agents [Exhibit 2 ‘page 2 of 2’] there were several text messages between Robel and Azamat and between Robel and Dias. According to Nicholas Wooldridge Azamat’s phone was cut off. No wonder we’re not told any details; and of course none of those messages are exhibited.

Aye yai yai. Also on the same page Demissie says: “Mr Tsarnaev stated that he and his brother were the only individuals involved in the attack, planning and execution. He further stated that he and his brother used powder from fireworks his brother purchased in New Hampshire to construct the bombs.” I think Demissie should tell us where he sources this information. It looks like he’s simply repeating what is stated in the FBI statements. If so, that is misleading because he is presenting those statements as fact, whereas they were written by FBI agents – the very people he [rightly] accuses of underhandedness; and therefore any information from them cannot be trusted to be factually correct. On page six Demissie says: “In fact the only reason he was on the UMass campus on April 18

th was because he had to attend a disciplinary

meeting because school officials found marijuana in his dorm the previous semester.” The cynic in me says it was no accident that that meeting fell on that day. What are the chances of that meeting taking place just prior to Jahar’s face being plastered all over the ‘news’ media as being one of the suspect bombers??? Nothing involving Masonic conspiracies is coincidental. Robel was being set up, and the masons were making far more of his pot smoking than it warranted. My guess is he smoked no more than any other student at that university; in fact I bet a lot of those students take much harder drugs. School officials would have turned a blind eye to that of course; Robel was the target. As said just as Jahar and Tamerlan were being watched closely prior to the bombings [for a good few years], so too were all their friends. The masons were on the look-out for anything they could use against these victims.

On page seven Demissie says: “At this point [notice Demissie avoids specifying a time] Azamat sent Robel a message to meet at Jahar’s

dorm room. Well since Aza’s phone was out of action, he couldn’t have sent that message! Once again this is all hearsay; where are the details? What time was this text sent, what exactly was stated, and why is it not an exhibit??? Robel was severely impaired by the effects of marijuana at this point.” It is repeatedly stated that Robel was so stoned that he didn’t remember what had happened during the evening of the 18

th April. It wasn’t the weed that had played havoc with his memory; it

was the FBI mind games and lengthy interrogation that had confused him.

Robel’s lawyers must have convinced him that being stoned was his best chance for an acquittal, or at least to be spared a jail sentence; knowing full well that it wouldn’t make a blind bit of difference. They know that when the masons have got it in for you you’re screwed. Alleged memory failure due to over use of marijuana is no defence; it is a betrayal. In actual fact I’ve asked a few stoners I know whether or not weed could actually affect your short term memory to such an extent that you could not remember where you were a day or so ago. They all laughed at the idea.

The rest of Demissie’s memoranda is just legalise i.e. it is ‘in the Masonic Matrix’ legal argument. As said all of these lawyers are just pretending to be defending their clients with their various ‘motions’ [all of which are funded by the enslaved American public] and all of which are Masonic approved [in other words there is nothing in any legal ‘motion’ that could threaten to dismantle the official narrative; which could only happen if a lawyer was not beholden to the Masonic powers, and defended his/her client properly.] Take a look at Demissie’s ‘ARGUMENT’ [p 10 of his motion to dismiss.] I quote: “When deciding a motion to dismiss, a court reviews the indictment assuming it’s factual allegations to be true. To prevail on a motion to dismiss the defendant must demonstrate that the allegations within the indictment, even if true would not constitute an offense.” This only happens if the court is legitimate i.e not corrupted by the secret sinister forces of freemasonry. Unfortunately ALL courts are Masonic ruled. That is not to say all decisions made in court will be improper, or that all judges and lawyers are dishonest - I daresay there are many cases where there is no need for Masonic intervention, and correct decisions are made - but where there is a Masonic conspiracy in play [as there was in my case during my 6 years of hell in the family courts], there absolutely will be Masonic skulduggery, and if the conspiracy is a psy-op, the underhanded machinations will be on a colossal scale.

Basically when the masons have it in for you, the law does not come into it. A case in point is the farce surrounding my son Andy’s claim for PIP, and his appeals. The last judge we had the misfortune to come face to face with, Mrs LAL Paul, on 4

th August 2016 informed us that she was

well aware of the law. She might have been. She didn’t abide by it. I have covert recordings in connection with Andy’s appeals, which will be published in due course. I quote from page 11: “Put another way were the statements predictably capable of influencing the decision-making process of the JTTF agents. This of course assumes the JTTF agents are above board; which they cannot possibly be when they are acting their part in a Masonic psy-op. In reviewing the content of the statements in their context and in comparison to their progress of the JTTF investigation [Demissie plays along with the pretence that there was a legitimate investigation. Obviously when there is a psy-op in play there is only the appearance of an investigation, since the victims in the dock are there on spurious charges] the answer to this investigation must be no. The alleged false statements, even if they were made, were not material to the terrorist investigation and cannot serve as the basis for prosecuting Mr Phillipos under the statute. Why does Demissie say ‘alleged false statements’? He says himself that Robel was coerced after hours of interrogation into signing a statement that is not the truth. That is a fact [it is an FBI exhibit]; nothing alleged about it. [See p 12 of Demissie’s motion: “The only reason the agents continued to question Mr Phillipos over the next few weeks was so they could prosecute him for making a false statement.” See also p 14: “Even though they were not misled, they continued to pursue him solely for the purpose of convincing him to say that he actually did remember being in Mr Tsarnaev’s dorm room.” And p 19: “This statement appears to be derived entirely from information he received from the agents during the interrogation and extrapolation based on his own imagination [confusion]. During the interrogation on April 25

th, the JTTF agents note

that they told Mr Phillipos what they believed had happened on the evening of April 18

th. They also told him that their version was supported

by several witnesses.”] What Demissie should have pointed out was that Robel clearly did not make any false statements until forced into signing his name to a statement prepared by FBI agents which was based on their ‘belief’ of what had happened. In fact for all we know that signature might not even be Robel’s - those agents could have forged it. And if it is his genuine signature, how do any of us know what threat of punishment awaited Robel if he didn’t sign it; or what torture he was undergoing in the lead up to him signing it?

In any case, and as said Demissie should not be ‘defending’ his client by skirting around these issues and thus legitimising the charges; if he was not ‘in’ on the psy-op he would have defended Robel properly i.e. on the points I have made. Course he would have needed balls of steel to do that, as it would mean turning on and biting the hand that feeds him. If he wanted to be a real hero he would have gone one further and reported everyone he knew to be testilying to the police; not that they would have done anything about it, but it would have been on record; he could then have taken out civil actions against corrupt officials/fellow lawyers/judges ... And when all that had failed [assuming he was still alive!] he could have written a book exposing the psy-op scandal. The alleged statements were made after the investigation was concluded and had no material effect on the investigation whatsoever... As said there was no investigation. Demissie and all the lawyers know this. They are just going along with the pretence. It is not alleged that Mr Phillipos committed a crime that he was concealing, and there was no crime actually concealed.” There was no crime actually committed - not by Robel at any rate; nor by Dias, Azamat, Jahar or Tamerlan or other friends of the Tsarnaevs who also fell victim to this ginormous psy-op. The ‘people’ [utter dregs on society] committing the crimes are the masons and their puppets, who of course include Demissie and his ilk, and all the other dirt bags who joined in the conspiracy to frame the Tsarnaevs and their friends. On page 19 Demissie states: “Though the indictment claims that Mr Phillipos’ initial statements to the JTTF were knowingly and wilfully false, it points to no specific facts that establish this contention.” Well since Robel clearly didn’t make any false initial statements, there obviously cannot be any ‘facts’ to establish that he did. There can only be lies. What Demissie should have stated instead in plain English is that Robel’s initial statements were the truth; what he was bullied into signing were the lies. What Demissie is doing can be likened to shifting the deckchairs on the Titanic. He knows very well that no matter how many ‘motions’ he makes on Robel’s behalf, none will make a blind bit of difference – Robel is doomed. What Demissie and all the other overpaid gangster lawyers are paid to do is literally go through the motions and play along with the charade, thus keeping everything in the Masonic matrix. Course all these lawyers know that they can only continue to practice law whilst they continue to play the Masonic games. If anything they

said or did came anywhere close to challenging the Masonic matrix, they would be manipulated out of their careers in no time. On p 20 he states: “The indictment, further, contains no allegation that Mr Phillipos was aware that making a false statement was a crime and therefore the charges should be dismissed” and “... the government should be required to establish that Mr Phillipos knew he was breaking the law when he made the allegedly false statements.” Why is Demissie acknowledging his client did break the law? He knows that Robel did not break any laws. The evidence for that could not be clearer. He should have defended him on the simple truth that there is no evidence that Robel broke any laws or that he lied about anything; that the evidence shows federal agents had conspired to bring a fraudulently concocted case against him. And as said why use such terminology as ‘allegedly false’? The charge is that he did knowingly make false statements. There is nothing alleged about that.

And on p 22 “Because the indictment [which, as said, is a fraud] only alleges that the defendant made misstatements “in a matter involving international or domestic terrorism within the jurisdiction of the executive branch” it fails to state necessary facts to support the sentencing enhancement.” Once again we see Demissie playing the Masonic game, going along with the misrepresentation of ‘misstatements’ and thus legitimising the charges. As for a possible connection to terrorists, he should have at least pointed out that at that stage Jahar had not gone to trial, and might [and should] therefore have been found completely innocent on all charges. Course what the bent prosecutors had in mind with their ‘sentencing enhancement’ was to jail these friends for as long as absolutely possible – to reinforce the message to the public that they were aiders and abettors of the dangerous terrorist Jahar, and as such would be punished severely. This show of heavy handedness was to demonstrate how the government [Masonic henchmen – the very scum responsible for the bombings and the events which followed] would ensure the official story would stick all the way through to conviction – for all Jahar’s friends, and most importantly for Jahar himself. This also drives home the message that ‘law-enforcement’ can round up and lock up anyone [and for a very long time] on the flimsiest of evidence or on fabricated evidence.

Course it looks to the average Joe who can be arsed reading court documents that the lawyers are genuinely representing their clients. These various motions, with their numerous references to case law do look impressive; as does the appearance of lawyers arguing for days/weeks on points of law/technical issues. But be under no illusion, court proceedings are just a play act; decisions are made behind the scenes long before anyone steps in court. Everything is geared towards the Masonic master staying in control, thus ensuring nothing can threaten the official narrative and the planned outcome for the victims. These court room criminals earn big bucks pretending. The ‘news’ outlets and so-called ‘alternative media’ continue the act. More on this in my ‘EXHIBIT CHART’ pdf. http://sharonkilby.co.uk/site/EXHIBIT_CHART_-_my_observations.php All the lawyers involved in the defence of Jahar, and the defence of all the friends of the Tsarnaev brothers, have sold their clients down the river. Shame on the bloody lot of them. May they reap their just rewards soon.

In their ‘GOVERNMENT’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL AND NEW TRIAL’ http://thebostonmarathonbombings.weebly.com/uploads/2/4/2/6/24264849/robel_aquittal_govt_reply.pdf lying conniving government lawyers Carmen Ortiz, Stephanie Siegmann and John Capin state [p 4]: “At approximately 7:00 p.m. on April 18, 2013, more than 11 hours before the suspects had been publicly identified, the defendant [Robel], in the company of his friend, Jim Li, saw the images of the suspected bombers that had been released by the FBI on CNN. Remember Robel says that from approx 7 p.m he was with Azamat at 69 Carriage Drive the whole time on April 18

th through to Friday morning. He says they

didn’t look at the ‘news’ until after 10 p.m. He says Dias was with his girlfriend Bayan in Dias’ bedroom the whole time. Jim Li testified that when the defendant saw these images, he said “Oh my God, that dude looks like Jahar.” Li and the defendant then watched television coverage of the bombing investigation for 1 ½ hours until approximately 8:30 p.m. Li indicated that during that period of time, he and the defendant “were glued to the coverage of the Marathon bombing investigation.” While they were watching the news coverage, Li’s roommate arrived, Quan Le, entered the room and said to the defendant and Li, “You need to look at this. Jahar’s on TV as the bombing suspect.” At no time while watching the news coverage between 7:00 and 8:30 p.m. did the defendant call the authorities to report

that he recognized Tsarnaev as one of the two suspected bombers. Neither did Quan Le or Jim Li. But they didn’t get admonished; did they! Instead, after leaving the Li and Le’s dormitory room, the defendant made plans with two other friends, Dias Kadrybayev (“Kadyrbayev”) and Azamat Tazhayakov (“Tazhayakov”), to go to Tsarnaev’s dormitory room at the Pinedale Dormitory. The defendant called Kadyrbayev four times between 8:30 and 8:49 [course those phone records are not available for the public’s prying eyes either, are they!] and then met Kadyrbayev and Tazhayakov outside Tsarnaev’s dormitory room at approximately 9:35 p.m.” Where’s the evidence Robel, Dias and Azamaz met outside Jahar’s room at approx 9:35 p.m? Jim Li and Quan Le testified; however despite a thorough search of the WWW for the transcripts of these Judases’ testimonies it seems we only have ‘reports’ [skewed truth and plain lies] from the Media Masonic mouthpieces http://www.wcvb.com/news/text-messages-between-bombing-suspect-friend-read-to-jury/29117818 http://live.bostonglobe.com/Event/Trial_of_Tsarnaev_friend_Robel_Phillipos?Page=4 What a disappointment; I’d love to get my hands on their testimonies; I’m sure I’d be able to poke a few holes in them.

Continuing with the ‘Robel acquittal government reply’: “When the defendant met up with Kadyrbayev and Tazhayakov in the hallway outside Tsarnaev’s dormitory room, he was accompanied by Lino Rosas. Kadyrbayev was unable to get into Tsarnaev’s dormitory room at that time [so why didn’t Dias seek the assistance of Andrew Dwinells at that point i.e. around 9:35 p.m???] and, as a result, all four men left the area and went to Lino Rosas’ dormitory room. Where is the evidence that this happened? After a few minutes, Kadyrbayev left Rosas’ room [so where did Dias go?] but the defendant and Tazhayakov stayed there and played a video game. Approximately fifteen minutes later, while the defendant and Tazhayakov were still playing the video game, the defendant received two text messages from Kadyrbayev at 9:58 p.m. and 10:00 p.m., which read: “Come to Jahars!!!,” and “Jahars.”” Two text messages! Here’s another variation of the story. 9:58 p.m seems pretty precise; so not 8 p.m or 9 p.m, then! Course the public are not privy to those texts either. As for Lino Rosa, Robel’s account is that at approx 3.30-3.45 p.m he and Aza left Rosa’s dorm room with Rosa. Robel says that he and Rosa went to Jahar’s and were met by Jahar and Andrew Dwinells. [That is disputed by Dwinells, not surprisingly – I quote the footnote on page 12: “According to the testimony of Tsarnaev’s roommate, Andrew Dwinnells, this interaction did not occur. Dwinells testified that he did not see

Tsarnaev awake on Thursday, April 18, 2013. Further, Dwinells did not observe Tsarnaev have a conversation with anyone in their room at any point on April 18, 2013.” Well if he didn’t see Jahar awake on April 18

th

he’s not going to see him have a conversation with anyone on that day! Joking aside [this is very serious for these victims, and our ultimate freedom from the Masonic mafia] why was it not clarified whether Dwinells’ testimony is that Jahar was asleep or out, or asleep and then out [or vice versa], and the duration of such? Why was it not clarified when Dwinells last saw Jahar?] Robel says he and Rosa were in the room for approx 10 mins. https://cbsboston.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/document44.pdf [p 6.] Rosa also testifies, however the transcript of his testimony doesn’t seem to be published either. I can only find the monkey media slant http://www.boston.com/news/local-news/2014/10/15/tsarnaev-friend-robel-phillipos-wanted-to-help-nail-tsarnaev-fbi-agent-testified There is no mention in the media as to whether Rosa confirms the presence of Dwinells. However according to Masonic puppet Patricia Wen: “The friend - now at Ramapo College in Mahwah,NJ - said he was interviewed by the FBI in June 2013. Then, his memory of 4/18 events hazy” So why did it take so long for the FBI to interview Rosa? Apparently his memory of the 18

th April by then was a little hazy, yet he

was asked to testify in court a further 16 months later. Huh? Well it’s no surprise his testimony is not available for the genuine armchair sleuths to scrutinise. I bet I could pull it apart. Also according to Wen: “On cross, friend recalls he was also very high on 4/18, yet maintains he can recall accurately Robel's condition then.” Thought his memory of that night was hazy!!! http://live.bostonglobe.com/Event/Trial_of_Tsarnaev_friend_Robel_Phillipos?Page=3 Whilst on the subject of witnesses, who else testified? Wen again: “Prosecutors show Borden to? text messages he exchanged w/Robel on 4/19. Borden tells Robel to be truthful to FBI & tell everything he knows.” David Borden’s testimony is not published either as far as I can tell. And, not surprisingly, neither are the text messages allegedly sent between Borden and Robel. Neither are we allowed to know what was stated, and when. Another Boston Globe ‘reporter’ [brown nose] Milton Valencia says: “Witness is Michael Creese, 22, originally from Boston, now UMass Dartmouth. Was Phillipos' freshman roommate.” And again it does not look like Creese’s testimony is published. According to Robel [see p 7 of

https://cbsboston.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/document44.pdf ] Robel went into Michael Creese’s dorm room and stayed approx 2 hours. He left at 6 p.m approx.

Valencia again: “Capin asking Creese, oh, so you remember texts

from Phillipos, from 18 months ago, though you were so high?”

http://live.bostonglobe.com/Event/Trial_of_Tsarnaev_friend_Robel_Philli

pos?Page=4 Course it goes without saying we’re not privy to those

texts!

Wen again: “Here at the trial of Robel Phillipos and a surprise witness

has appeared. Former Gov. Michael Dukakis has arrived as defense

witness.”

Valencia again: “A professor, former politician. "You were a governor of the state?" "I was." And: “Dukakis was a lawyer. But Robel didn't immediately say he needed legal help, advice, a lawyer. Not until he was arrested.” Dukakis’ testimony is one in particular that I’d love to study; alas that too is not published. And what titbits we get from the Masonic media stooges tells us nowt. Of course I don’t know for sure but I’d be very surprised if he wasn’t a mason and ‘in’ on the dirty conspiracy. He is after all a former governor and a lawyer; he was also the 1988 Democratic presidential nominee. That speaks volumes - he lives very comfortably in the Masonic matrix. He doesn’t seem genuine; here are a few things he said: “During questioning by prosecutor, Dukakis said he didn't know why Robel seemed "upset" on the phone, "but he was upset." Dukakis also said that Robel "told me he was so confused he didn't know what he said." "For instance, do you know if he was upset because he lied to the FBI."

Dukakis saying he knows nothing of interview. End of cross.”

http://live.bostonglobe.com/Event/Trial_of_Tsarnaev_friend_Robel_Philli

pos?Page=5

He knows nothing of any of the FBI interviews? Then why bother taking the stand pretending to help him? Since that trial, and especially since Jahar’s trial, I haven’t seen him going to the news papers and raising any of the ‘out of the Masonic matrix’ points or asking the type of

questions that I do! Truth will out about him too one day. Mark my words; he’s just another pretender; going along with the charade; he’s ‘in’ on it alright. Back to Wen: “... jurors are watching a video deposition of Bayan Kumiskali.” Bayan Kumiskali is another witness I’m really interested in. Unfortunately her testimony is not published either. And once again, and not surprisingly, not much is revealed by the associated presstitutes about what she says. Take a look at what Aza’s lawyer Wooldridge has to say about what she apparently said in court [which is wildly different to Robel’s account and as said also contradicts the alleged accounts of Dias and Aza.] http://thebostonmarathonbombings.weebly.com/uploads/2/4/2/6/24264849/azamat_aquital.pdf [see pages 4 and 20.] I quote: “Bayan Kumiskali, Dias’ girlfriend and an immunized Government witness, [red flag alert] testified as to what occurred. When Azamat arrived at the apartment, Azamat and Bayan never discussed Dzhokhar. According to Bayan, Azamat never actually entered the apartment. Dias and Azamat left together. Before leaving, Dias informed Bayan that he was going to go pick up Robel Phillipos. According to Bayan, Dias left 69A Carriage Drive from 9:21 p.m, and returned at approximately 10:47 p.m. [approximately 10:47 p.m?] on April 18, 2013.” I know I’ve already mentioned her account of the time Dias allegedly went with his friends to Jahar’s, but it’s worth repeating. What I’m curious about is that those times are specific, so how was she so sure of them? Why is no-one questioning that? Wooldridge also says in his ‘PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT AZAMAT TAZHAYAKOV’ https://www.scribd.com/document/229013545/Doc-239-Proposed-Jury-Instructions-on-Behalf-of-Azamat-Tazhayakov-060914 [p 26]: “You have heard the testimony of Bayan Kumiskali. She provided evidence under an immunity agreement with the government. Some people in this position are entirely truthful when testifying. Still, you should consider the testimony of this individual with particular caution given that she was given an agreement from the government not to be prosecuted for her role in the alleged conduct. They may have had reason to make up stories or exaggerate what others did because they wanted to help themselves.” See also page 37. I quote: “If you find that the witness made an earlier statement that conflicts with his or her trial testimony, you may consider that fact in deciding how much of his or her trial testimony, if any, to

believe. In making this determination, you may consider whether the witness purposely made a false statement or whether it was an innocent mistake; whether the inconsistency concerns an important fact, or whether it had to do with a small detail; whether the witness had an explanation for the inconsistency, and whether that explanation appealed to your common sense.” I have never seen any witness asked to explain his/her inconsistencies!

It would appear that the reason Bayan’s testimony, and the testimonies of the so-called ‘friends’ of the defendants aren’t published is because they will reveal that these witnesses are blatantly lying. The Masonic mafia only allow publication of material that assists them; they move hell and high water to keep under wraps the actual truth and anything that might threaten the unravelling of the psy-op. Incidentally I don’t like calling it an ‘inside job’ as that term was coined by the men in power; the very people behind all false flag attacks. It is a Masonic psychological operation. Likewise I don’t like the term ‘FBI informant’, or ‘government informant’ or ‘police informant’; all ‘informants’ are actually Masonic informants. Aside from the victims of psy-ops, such as Bayan, who are persuaded to serve the Masonic powers rather than face being stitched up on trumped up charges themselves, informants are people who are guilty of some criminal behaviour that could see them banged up for a very long time; so to reduce their sentence, or to secure immunity from prosecution, some agree to serve the masons as informants. Thus rather than get punished for their crimes, they get rewarded. When you agree to sell out to the masons in this way though, your arse belongs to them i.e. you can never come clean, as you risk severe punishment should you try. This is the case for all shills, trolls, fake ‘victims’, fake ‘armchair sleuths’; they too are shackled to the Masonic controller. Back to the ‘Robel acquittal government reply’. I quote from page 6: “Additionally, when Kadyrbayev showed the fireworks to Tazahayakov, he said, “I believe he used these to make a bomb.” Second, Kadyrbayev showed Tazhayakov a jar of Vaseline. When Kadyrbayev showed this jar to Tazhayakov, Kadyrbayev said, “I believe he used it to make a bomb.”” Where is the proof Dias said this? As said, I have seen no evidence that any of these defendants were in Jahar’s dorm on the evening in question, let alone that any of them saw any fireworks, backpacks or Vaseline that evening. According to the script the Tsarnaevs followed the recipe to ‘Make a bomb in the kitchen of your Mom’ which is in the Inspire magazine https://azelin.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/aqap-inspire-magazine-

volume-1-uncorrupted.pdf [p 33]; however there is no mention of Vaseline there. From page 8: “Phillipos chose to lie to the agents and during each of his

five interviews he made false, misleading, and inconsistent statements.” I think the FBI agents and the government attorneys should be obliged to PROVE that claim. From page 14: “Delapena interviewed the defendant for approximately three hours. (interview done by around 2:00 p.m.) Where’s the PROOF of that? Where’s the PROOF it was finished by around 2:00 p.m? Initially, the defendant told Special Agent Delapena that he did not remember going into Tsarnaev’s room. “Toward the end of the interview, [Phillipos] then admitted to [Delapena] that, in fact, he did remember going into the room.” After this admission, Phillipos confessed to Delapena that he saw Kadyrbayev remove a backpack containing fireworks from Tsarnaev’s room and that he recalled a conversation about getting rid of the backpack. S A Delapena should be required to PROVE all that is true. Special Agent prepared a written statement of what Phillipos told him he remembered about the evening of April 18, 2013, which Delapena typed on a computer [oh really, Delapena typed up what Robel was saying? Why didn’t the forked tongued Delapena simply record everything Robel [and thus himself] was saying???] that was located on a desk in front of him and Phillipos. Phillipos reviewed every line of the statement as Delapena typed it and made all changes and revisions Philipos requested. PROVE IT. After conducting this process for the entirety of a two page, single spaced statement, the defendant signed the statement in Delapena’s presence.” As said, an obviously coerced statement is a false statement; and as such is invalid. And why is Delapena’s signature not attached to that statement? From page 17: “Accordingly, this Court should not disturb the thoughtful and consistent verdicts rendered in this case.” Verdicts reached by juries who will have been oblivious to the dirty secretive behind-the-scenes Masonic machinations are not sound. Even the smartest of jurors would be outwitted and befuddled by skilful and adroit but very evil lawyers and judges; all of whom conspired to ensure convictions and jail sentences all round – as per the Masonic agenda. Most people who sit on a jury are trusting of the legal beagles, and simply could not comprehend that deception and manipulation on such a grand scale could occur in a court of law.

And: “Here, as in Mubayyid, Special Agents Dwight Schwader, Detective Earle, and Special Agent Timothy Quinn testified, had Phillipos answered the questions truthfully, [no-one has shown any evidence that he didn’t answer truthfully] they would have asked additional questions and pursued additional lines of inquiry, which Phillipos’ lies foreclosed.” These agents need to PROVE that Robel lied. We only have their word that he did. Why should we believe them? We need to know what questions they did ask. The government lawyers cannot claim that Robel’s alleged ‘lies’ foreclosed anything without PROVING that he lied. And: “(Schwader: if Phillipos had told Schwader he had gone inside

Tsarnaev’s room, “interview would have been drastically different.”)” According to this sly conniving bunch of agents and lawyers Robel underwent many hours of questioning; please tell us what else could have been covered that wasn’t already. What the fuck were these FBI pricks talking about for hours on end??? From page 18: “Further, Walker explained that the terrorism investigation was still continuing at the time he testified in October 2014.” Walker, just like all these FBI tossers, is a filthy lying bastard who is up to his neck in this dirty psy-op. From page 19: “The Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 added the terrorism penalty enhancement provision to Section 1001(a) to deter people from making false statements that had the potential to impede a terrorism investigation. Congress intended the increased penalty to apply to actions like those alleged against Phillipos.” All members of Congress are beholden to the same Masonic powers who are responsible for the Boston marathon bombing carnage and all false flag terrorist attacks. All of them are aiders and abettors of terrorists. Nuff said about Congress in my pdf on the ‘[censored] House Homeland Security Committee report’. http://sharonkilby.co.uk/site/THE_[CENSORED]_HOUSE_HOMELAND_SECURITY_COMMITTEE_REPORT_dated_March_2014_entitled_The_Road_to_Boston.php From page 20: “Report states, in pertinent part: This section amends §§ 1001(a) and 1505 of title 18, to increase penalties from not more than 5 years to not more than 10 years for making false statements and obstructing justice, if the subject matter relates to international or domestic terrorism and directs the United States Sentencing Commission to amend the Sentencing Guidelines ... It is the US

Commission and others in government and the ‘justice’ system who make false statements and obstruct justice, and aid and abet terrorists, not Jahar’s friends. Fukkin hypocrites. The Committee believes that even 1 minute wasted to ascertain the offender could lead to immense harm. Every minute is critical in an investigation, and intentionally sending investigators on the wrong path or deliberately slowing down an investigation by refusing to assist law enforcement could cost lives. The increase in penalty reflects that this is a severe crime and should be adequately punished.” Cheeky bastards. From page 21: “The jury was instructed to find, and the government proved, the defendant made the false statements wilfully and knowingly. The Masonic controlled government did no such thing. Other than incorporating by reference the argument made in his Motion to Dismiss, the defendant has failed to articulate any deficiency in the government’s proof at trial.” I haven’t seen the government prove any of their claims.

And in its conclusion: “WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth above, the Government respectfully requests that the Court [both of which are controlled by the same piss taking Masonic puppet master] deny defendant Phillipos’ Motion for a Judgment of Acquittal and/or a New Trial in its entirety.” Even if he got a new trial, the outcome would be no different. Demissie knows it too. That is of course unless the masons kept their filthy beaks out of it. Ha ha good luck with that. Ok, so let’s have a gander at what Aza’s lying lawyer Wooldridge has to say for himself. I’m just going to quote randomly from his ‘Memorandum of Law’ http://thebostonmarathonbombings.weebly.com/uploads/2/4/2/6/24264849/azamat_aquital.pdf You can read it yourself and figure out where I’ve quoted from. “The heart of the Government’s case consisted primarily of the testimony of five federal agents. These agents, none of which were present on the night and morning in question, testified to the substance of unrecorded interviews with Azamat on separate occasions that occurred well over a year before they testified. At least two of these Agents were impeached. Additionally, when Agents were present together during an interview their accounts of the interview were inconsistent.

According to Bayan she and Dias were in his bedroom, alone, at 69A Carriage Drive when Dias received a phone call from a person Bayan believed to be Robel Phillipos. [Counsel is unable to refer to the trial transcript, as the video taped deposition was not transcribed. It wasn’t transcribed because it would reveal that Bayan was obviously lying.] Agent Wood further testified about what happened at Dzhokhar’s dorm room on the evening of April 18, 2013. Agent Wood claimed that when Dias and Azamat arrived at the Pine Hall Dorm room, Dias located Dzhokhar’s roommate and talked to the roommate while Azamat and Robel “hung back”, and then subsequently the roommate allowed all three, Dias, Azamat and Robel into the room. This contradicts Dwinells’ testimony. He says Dias was there for 10 mins on his tod before Aza and Robel joined him.

Agent Azad’s testimony concerning what transpired in the dorm room was inconsistent with Agent Wood’s account, as well Agent Quinn’s. While Agent Quinn during his testimony discussed the subject of Vaseline in the dorm room, Quinn admitted that Azamat never claimed Dias whispered the information about Dias’ belief concerning Dzhokhar using Vaseline to make a bomb. Agent Azad and Quinn who were both present during the same interview on April 20, 2013 gave conflicting accounts of what occurred back at the apartment on the evening of April 18, 2013 and the early morning hours of April 19, 2013. Agent Wiroll claimed he received a written report, a 302, from Federal Agents on April 20, 2014 and then subsequently converted parts of the Agents words in the 302 into his own Report. Bad enough that these bastards got away with writing reports based on what they say is their recollection of what they were told, but to then find that other agents changed parts of those reports and incorporated them into their own reports is simply jaw dropping. If any of those lawyers had a conscience and a backbone they would turn their back on the legal profession and would be writing books exposing this outrageous scam. Course none of them can ever do that as they are all neck deep in this filthy Masonic conspiracy. Should any of them try to come clean, they will be punished severely. They know it too. When Agent Wiroll began to read the report, the way he read it to Azamat, he was instructed by the Court to slow down as it was difficult

for both the Reporter and the rest us to “pick up.” There was no evidence that Agent Wiroll slowed down when he read the report to Azamat, a Kazhakstan National who was using the aid of the consul, a nonofficial interpreter.

While Agent Wood testified Azamat informed her that Azamat received both a telephone call from Dias and exchanged text messages with Dias about Dzhokhar being the bomber prior to coming back to the apartment, such testimony is uncorroborated by the Government’s own documentary evidence. For example, Dias text messages show no such exchange between Azamat and Dias. Additionally the Government’s own witnesses testified that Azamat cell phone service was not working at the time, therefore, he could not have received a telephone from Dias. As I’ve pointed out, not only are all the agents exposed as outright liars, so too has Wooldridge exposed himself as a blatant liar.

Agent Wood’s, Azad’s and Wiroll’s testimony were incredible. Much of Agent Wood’s testimony is beyond assailable, and crosses the line into incredible. Apart from Agent Wood being impeached during her cross examination with her affidavit, Instead, Agent Wood’s testimony was nothing more than contrived. All the agents’ testimonies were contrived. Completely unsupported by phone records and the text messages submitted as evidence, [course we only have the word of the lying lawyers that these texts and phone records were exhibited] is Agent Wood’s testimony that Azamat admitted he received a telephone call and text message from Dias wherein Dias informed Azamat, Dzokhar was on the news at the bomber. As to the text messages, the Government’s own printouts of text messages from both Azamat and Dias Kadbrybayev’s phones admitted into evidence never cooborated Agent Wood’s testimony as no such text exchange existed between Azamat and Dias. As said we only have the word of the collaborators that text messages were admitted into evidence. We’re not allowed to see them. Why? Silly question that; wasn’t it. Obviously the legal snakes will point out that the jury saw those exhibits. Well we don’t know which ones they saw [if any.] In any case I wonder about these juries. It looks to me that the jurors deciding the fate of these young men must have been asleep on the job. Either that or they were simply brain frazzled by the lawyers. The other possibility is that they are all Masonic insiders. The same can be said about the jury who found Jahar guilty. You have to question how any of the jurors at Jahar’s trial could possibly have found him guilty on any of the charges he faced, let alone all 30. No honest person of average intelligence

would have done. So the 12 people [7 women, 5 men] who made up that jury must either have been a bunch of halfwits, or they were cowed, or they were part of the conspiracy; or they were simply asleep during the whole proceeding.

So the masonic mouthpieces can tell us that the jury made their decision based on the evidence, but since vitally important evidence and witness testimonies - upon which these friends of Jahar’s were convicted - are withheld from the public, we’re entitled to be sceptical. Agent Azad, like Agent Wood, was also impeached, only not with an affidavit, but with his testimony in a prior proceeding. While this does not necessarily mean that Agent Azad is completely untruthful, it casts a dark shadow on his credibility, especially in light of the circumstances surrounding Azamat’s purported statement. The circumstances include the fact that Agent Azad admittedly omitted the statement from his 302, and even more troubling Agent Quinn, the Agent who was with Azad, testified that during the same interview the topic of Bayan Kumiskali being upset never came up. After further discussion, Agent Walker “invited” Azamat to come to the Police Barracks to be questioned further by the F.B.I. Azamat arrived, shirtless, at the Police Barracks at approximately 7:00 p.m., and was escorted into a Police interview room [a proper interview room whereby the recording device remained inactive!] a half hour later by Special Agents Azad and Wood.

Agent Wood testified that after Azamat entered the interview room, his handcuffs were removed, and then he asked to use the restroom. With the only actual record of the events of April 19, 2013, the surveillance video, Agent Wood was impeached. The video showed Azamat using the restroom at 7:48 p.m. All the FBI agents involved in the interrogations of all three defendants should be held accountable for their vile lies. They should be the ones on the stand being cross-examined on their claims. And since they were involved in very high profile cases, their trials should be televised - so that the whole world can see them squirming in the dock. And when they’re exposed as dirty lying collaborators they can be done for perjury too; and they can all look forward to being banged up for a very long time. If someone wants to start a class action and sue their sorry arses for malicious prosecution and slander, I would gladly make a donation to help the families and the real friends of these young men bring these FBI

scumbags to book. Perhaps Dukakis could throw his weight [and his money] behind such an action [he is a lawyer after all.] Ha ha, fat chance. He is absolutely NOT on the side of truth and justice. The evidence established that Dias was the one who had searched the dorm room and located the backpack, it was Dias who took the backpack from the dorm room to the apartment on 69A Carriage Drive, and it was Dias who discarded the backpack by himself and alone. Liar Wooldridge. The evidence established no such thing. As said, no-one has shown any evidence that Dias or any of Jahar’s friends searched Jahar’s dorm room, let alone that any of them took anything from Jahar’s room. Azamat never intended to impede the Government’s investigation. As in the case of Robel’s lawyers, if Wooldridge was not part of the dirty conspiracy, he would not be saying that Aza didn’t intend to impede the government’s [pretend] investigation, he would have stated there is no evidence that Aza impeded any investigation, since there is no evidence that Aza was even at Jahar’s on the evening in question; that the evidence is Aza was fitted up by lying FBI agents on trumped up charges. Azamat did not knowingly and willfully associate himself in some way with the crime, nor did he willfully participate in the crime as something he wished to bring about through some affirmative act in furtherance of the offense.” Azamat, nor any of Jahar’s friends associated themselves in any way with any crime. The people associated with the crime of removing a backpack containing fireworks and whatever else the bloody masons put in the backpack are the people involved in the conspiracy to stitch up Jahar’s totally innocent friends; people like Wooldridge and all the other filthy lying lawyers, and the judge and all the FBI agents involved. Course Dias’ lawyers Stahl and Gasiorowski are also playing the game, laughing all the way to the bank, smugly going through their own Masonic motions: https://www.scribd.com/document/217700041/Doc-117-Motion-to-Dismiss-Dias-041114

You have to laugh wryly at what these monkeys say. I’ll just quote this [from page 2]: “The indictment alleges that Mr. Kadyrbayev, along with co-defendant Azmat Tazhayakov, removed items including a backpack and lap top computer from the dormitory room of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, and that they did so with the intent to obstruct, influence or

impede the pending FBI investigation into the Boston Marathon bombing. Mr. Kadyrbayev now moves for dismissal of the Indictment, on the grounds that the statute under which he is being prosecuted, 18 U.S.C. § 1519, is unconstitutionally vague.” All these bloody lawyers are deliberately vague! They don’t give clear detailed time-lines, and they don’t name names [unless making a specific point about someone] ... in short their ‘motions’ don’t contain the points I’ve repeatedly made! It seems to me that these defendants had no choice but to go along with the accusation that they were at Jahar’s on the evening of the 18

th April, and thus

a party to the taking of items from Jahar’s room. They will have been told that a number of witnesses [including Dias’ own girlfriend] were prepared to testify to that effect. They were obviously warned that should they stand their ground and protest their complete innocence they would face very lengthy jail sentences, in very harsh prisons. All three had been interrogated for hours on end; who knows what torture they actually endured [we only know about the torment that the masons want us to know about which was bad enough]; Jahar’s friends knew very well they were cornered. They knew their only option was to trust their lawyers, and follow their advice. Little did they know their lawyers were part of the conspiracy to ensure convictions, and most importantly, jail sentences. Neither do they and their families realise that the Kazakhstan consulate will never be of any use to them whatsoever, as it, just like all consulates, is beholden to the same Masonic powers who are behind the Boston marathon bombing and the framing of Jahar and all the friends of the Tsarnaev brothers. I quote from p 46 of https://jimmysllama.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/tazhayakov-motions-hearing-transcript.pdf “No. 51 is the exact time when the defendants were advised of their right to contact the country's consulate. MS. SIEGMANN: I'm sorry. The Government's response with regards to -- the consul notification -- the defendants were provided consular notification on April 20th. MS. SIEGMANN: A document that was signed by both defendants acknowledging that they wanted their consulate notified. MS. SIEGMANN: There is no time on it. Let's see if I have it with me. But it's dated April 20th. The defendant Tazhayakov was also notified. He actually asked for the names of the consulate, and during the course of the interview the FBI Special Agent listed, wrote down the name of the consulate and the phone numbers in New York. He was then allowed to make a call during the interview so he could talk to the consulate, if he so chose, the consul.

MS. SIEGMANN: Oh April 19th, Mr. Kadyrbayev, actually, and his mother had both spoken to the Kazakhstan consul, and then with regards to Mr. Tazhayakov, he actually texted his mother with the phone number for the Kazakhstan consul before he talked to the FBI at 12:12 p.m. on April 19th. They then talked to the FBI that evening THE COURT: 12:12 p.m. meaning just shortly after noon? MS. SIEGMANN: Yes. So, at approximately 7:00 p.m. they went to the barracks. So, hours before they were very well aware of the consul. They both had some type of correspondence and calls with him and actually had done some internet searches on April 17th, two days earlier, to try to get the phone number for the consul during the Boston Marathon bombing investigation. It seems Sieg Heil, in her zest to convince the jury that the government were being very nice and considerate to these foreigners by helping them access their consulate, has boobed; why would these students even think about their consul when at that stage there was no inkling of Jahar’s possible involvement in the bombing? On April 19th, Mr. Tazhayakov asked to speak to the consul, and during the course of the FBI interview at the barracks he was provided phone numbers, and he then tried to contact the consul.” Amir Ismagulov, father of Azamat Tazhayakov is of the belief that the Feds are unfairly targeting his son because he is a foreign-born Muslim. http://www.bostonherald.com/news_opinion/local_coverage/2013/08/dad_of_accused_bomber_s_pal_says_son_a_scapegoat This is what the Masonic elite want you to believe. They want you thinking Muslims are the enemy. They’re not. We are all one people; we are all being manipulated into the one world totalitarian State. Our fight is not against any group of people, or any race, it is against our slave masters. They are dividing us. They are the ones instigating all wars – they pit country against country, they are responsible for all racial wars, religious wars, gang warfare, right down to family and spiritual warfare. Incidentally in the above motion on p 17 the government apparently state in an email “the government will offer evidence to establish that the defendants’ obstructive conduct included, but was not limited to, removing items from the dorm room, disposing of the backpack and its contents, retaining the laptop, and, in the case of Tazhayakov, deleting text messages from his telephone after first being interviewed by the FBI.” As said if this was a genuine investigation no-one would get a chance to delete texts once they’d been interviewed, as phones would be seized immediately, and all texts logged. In any case this is probably

just another lie. We’re not told which texts he deleted [there couldn’t have been any pertaining to the 18

th April, since his phone was

supposedly out of action on that day!] Why would Aza delete texts on any other day? It isn’t believable. Will someone please sue these loathsome colluding lawyers [and all the judges involved] as well as all the agents. I will make a very generous donation to such an action. And now, those 302s. Harvey Silverglate does a very good write up here http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2013/05/10/beware-fbi-when-not-recording/yz55UX8WMKU080pN4aP68K/story.html on the FBI’s failure to record. I copy/paste from it: “FBI agents always interview in pairs. One agent asks the questions, while the other writes up what is called a “form 302 report” based on his notes. The 302 report, which the interviewee does not normally see, becomes the official record of the exchange; any interviewee who contests its accuracy risks prosecution for lying to a federal official, a felony. And here is the key problem that throws the accuracy of all such statements and reports into doubt: FBI agents almost never electronically record their interrogations; to do so would be against written policy. How does he know that they almost never record their interviews? I bet they do when they’re dealing with regular run-of-the-mill criminals i.e. when there is no Masonic skulduggery at work. In 2006 the FBI defended its no-electronic-recording policy in an internal memorandum, which The New York Times later made public. More on that in a min. But the FBI leaves out the even more potent criticism of its practice — that such interview tactics seem virtually geared toward establishing as fact what the FBI wanted to hear from the witness. Frightened and confused interviewees, who, if they deny they said what any 302 report claims they uttered, can then be indicted for making false statements. The FBI is thus able to put words into a witness or suspect’s mouth and coerce him to adopt the FBI’s version as his own. The FBI thus establishes the official version of what a witness said, and the pressure on the witness to adhere to the 302 version is enormous. Any deviation, after all, raises the question: “Were you lying during your FBI interview, or are you lying now?” The lesson: As long as the FBI relies solely on its agents’ uncorroborated reports of such interviews, it is difficult to credit the

bureau’s version of what was and was not said. Presumably, much more is going to emerge concerning what Phillipos really told his interrogators, and nobody should arrive at any conclusions until all of the evidence, from both sides, has been made public. The FBI is not entitled to any presumption of credibility in these situations.” Well, precious little ‘evidence’ has been made public. Ok let’s take a look at that policy and the excuses given for not having a mandatory recording policy. See http://www.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/national/20070402_FBI_Memo.pdf It is stated: “Agents may not electronically record confessions or interviews unless authorised by the SAC [Special Agent in Charge] or his or her designee.” And: “It has been FBI policy for nearly 8 years to grant an SAC the authority and flexibility to permit recording if he or she deems it advisable.” That translates to a Special Agent [who will be a high level mason] deciding whether or not it suits the masons to have an interviewee recorded. See this request for a pilot program for an interesting read whereby some good points are put forward for reasons to record [which to me is stating the obvious] by Paul K Charlton US Attorney, District of Arizona http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/DOJDocsPt4-1070319.pdf Not surprisingly the request was rejected. What this no-recording policy means is that the masons are at liberty to record the people they so choose. So, they can record regular criminals; and they can omit to record the victims of their Masonic conspiracies; such as those they’re fitting up as fall guys in their false flag terror attacks. They can also omit to record one of their own; for example a brother mason who may have committed a crime, thus ensuring said person escapes prosecution or receives a lighter sentence. Course this no-recording policy also protects FBI agents from being exposed as blatant liars. So what is Silverglate doing about this outrageous and completely unjustifiable policy? NOWT. And he never will. Why? Because he’s just another pretender; living comfortably and securely in the Satanic Masonic matrix. He’s almost certainly a high degree mason himself. This is what he boasts: “I’m a four-decade columnist and contributor to the Boston Phoenix, an alternative weekly, as well as an occasional contributor to The National Law Journal, Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly, The Wall Street Journal, The Boston Globe, and elsewhere. My books include Three Felonies a Day: How the Feds Target the Innocent

(Encounter Books, 2009) and The Shadow University: The Betrayal of Liberty on America's Campuses.” http://www.forbes.com/sites/harveysilverglate/2011/07/27/constructing-truth-the-fbis-nonrecording-policy/#3b355a0617f0 Nuff said. Only Masonic approved writing gets into such publications, and only Masonic approved authors get their books published. If he was genuine he would have written a very hard hitting article by now exposing the downright disgusting legal malfeasance perpetrated by every lawyer and the judge involved in the Tsarnaev case. Likewise he would have exposed the disgraceful kangaroo trials suffered by Jahar’s friends. He would be raising the points and asking the questions that I do. But he doesn’t; he stays silent, thus ensuring Jahar and his friends continue to suffer gross injustice, and the truth remains firmly buried. Harvey Silverglate calls himself a criminal and civil liberties lawyer. Ha ha, he could very well be a criminal; he’s certainly no defender of civil liberties. There is no such thing as civil liberties whilst an unseen unaccountable unscrupulous all-powerful freemasonic body controls the judicial system. Now I’m going to copy/paste/comment some more on ‘Day Two of Motion Hearing’ https://jimmysllama.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/tazhayakov-motion-hearing-day-two.pdf As said I will comment more thoroughly on these court documents [and a whole lot more] when I do the pdf on the friends of the Tsarnaevs. Take a look at page 15, whereby agent Wanker is under cross from Stahl. I quote the Q & A: “Q. And to remove those handcuffs it took some effort, because they had to be cut off him, correct? A. They had to be cut, and the effort only consisted of neither myself nor the police officer had immediate access to a cutting tool.” Wanker also tells Stahl [p 44] “I wasn't speaking with him for the entire time, because a portion of that we were -- the police officer and I were seeking a cutting tool.” Why wasn’t he asked what tool he eventually found suitable for the job? And on page 90: “Q. And it has to be physically cut off with a sharp knife or a razor, correct? A. It does.” Huh? Are we being told more porky pies, or do the FBI use handcuffs that can be opened just by something sharp; no key required? Sounds like a criminal’s paradise to me.

On page 184 under redirect from Capin, Agent Azad is asked what the overall goal of interviewing Dias was on the evening of April 19

th. Azad

replies: “Everything he knew. He appeared to be actually associated with Jahar, and we just wanted to learn what we could.” So the prick wants to get vital information about a most dangerous terrorist who has gone on the run; but he leaves it to chance as to what info he can recall!!! Laugh out fukkin loud. On page 197 Agent Candice Marie Kelly tells Stahl that she did not write a report about the arrest of Dias and Aza. When asked what documents she’d reviewed to refresh her recollection before testifying in court well over a year later, she says: “The only document that I read was a 213 Report that was written by Jamie Wiroll.” Here is the following Q & A: “Q. And what is a 213 Report? A. A 213 Report is a narrative that's written for the Immigration documents that goes to the Immigration Judge. Q. And what you have testified to about four to seven agents and where people were located and Agent Walker, none of that is in Agent Wiroll's 213, correct? A. It's not. Q. So, did you take notes that day? A. I did not. Q. So, you are basing this on your recollection of some 13-or-so months ago, correct? A. Correct.” Shocking. Here’s the Q & A on page 201: “A. I don't recall there being any local police officers, but I have been told that there was one uniformed police officer from the town. Q. That would be New Bedford? A. I can't recall. Q. And there came a point in time where there was more than one FBI agent, more than Agent Walker? A. I don't recall there being anyone other than Agent Walker.” She didn’t prepare for this court testimony, did she! And on page 202: “Q. You said that some people named "Dias" and "Azamat," the younger female, "Bayan," correct -- do you remember her name? A. I don't remember her name.” From page 203 on: “Q. And all four were then told to sit down, correct? A. At what point they were told to sit down, I don't recall. So, we actually went -- we decided -- we actually came up with a plan amongst ourselves to try to ruse the media, in which we then moved all of our vehicles around to the front of the apartment to make it appear as though we were going to leave the front of the apartment, and then we brought them out the back doors of the apartment. Yeah, like that’s really going to throw the media off the scent. L.O.L Q. You handcuffed him in the front or the back, Agent? A. I don't recall.

Q. Was Dias read his rights at the apartment? A. I do not recall. I did not read his rights. Q. Well, you were present the entire time, were you not? A. I was.” So she didn’t make notes, didn’t write a statement, didn’t record anything, and can’t recall much when questioned in court over a year later. FFS. And from page 207 there’s more of the same – this time from agent Steven Valentine. I quote: “Q. Sir, now, directing your attention to April 20th, 2013, did you participate in the arrests of Dias Kadyrbayev and Azamat Tazhayakov? A. I did. Q. When did you first hear those individuals' names mentioned by your agency? A. Probably the morning before. I don't remember if I -- I had seen the names. Another [no named] agent had called me and mentioned that he believed that these two individuals, Dias and Azamat, could be friends with Jahar and that they could be out of status, [yeah like that’s the way it works ... you know by chance ... like casually ...] and they had potentially come through Logan recently, suggested we might look into that. I then passed the information to my group supervisor and asked her if she wanted us to look into it. What info? Doesn’t look like he has any. However, when we pulled up the media was there. They started to kind of swarm around. So, when I was standing by the back door someone inside kind of moved the blinds, and we were kind of almost face-to-face. So, I said, "Hey, do you mind if we come in, the media's out here?" He said, "No problem," and let us in. Q. Do you recall who it was that let you in? A. I'm sorry, I don't. Q. Was it one of the two defendants? A. I'm sorry, I don't recall. It was kind of a surprise. I was just supposed to stand back there. I was almost surprised to see someone open the blinds, and shortly thereafter the door was opened. So once again this idiot is testifying in court, on oath, based on his memory of something that happened over a year ago. So why didn’t he take notes/write a report? Why did he not prepare for court; for example why didn’t he ask his colleagues who had let them in etc??? Q. After asking for permission to allow your fellow agents into the apartment, who let the other agents in? A. It was either myself or Agent McDonough, I can't remember if it was me who actually twisted the knob or Agent McDonough. A. The other agents came in, and they began to kind of encounter those and figure out who was there and what their status was, and I kind of just took a position -- I think I did a brief walkthrough, just kind of looked to make sure there was no one else in there. And then I kind of stood over by the backdoor in the kitchen,

because there was a lot of, like, kitchen utensils, to include knives, in the open. So, I was just kind of standing there, making sure nothing went wrong, anybody didn't go reaching for any knives. Sure you did, ya lying twat. Q. I'm Robert Stahl. I represent Dias Kadyrbayev. Do you recognize them today, or has it been too long? A. Yes, I do. Q. And did you write a report about any of this? A. I did not. Q. What did you review to refresh your recollection in, it has been 13-plus months? A. I have seen their faces on the Internet. I recognize both their faces, even if I hadn't, and I did take a look at some pictures out in the hallway. I couldn't tell you exactly what they were -- I would guess that it might have been maybe a picture from a Visa application, but that's just a guess. No recordings, no reports, no notes, no preparation for court; just guessing, seen their faces on internet, maybe from a Visa application ... JEESH. No wonder these twats arrested the wrong guys!!! Q. What did you do to refresh your recollection about the facts you have been testifying to, not their appearances? A. This is it. It's coming from memory, sir.” Wonder what reward these stupid agents got from their Masonic handlers for agreeing to sell out and in the doing make themselves look such incompetent buffoons. And now a few more comments on the ‘Day One of Motion Hearing’ https://jimmysllama.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/tazhayakov-motion-hearing-transcript-day-one.pdf

From page 15: “I think, Mr. Wooldridge, you have got some pretty

important things happening to you and your family. MR. WOOLDRIDGE: Yeah, in September, Judge, my wife is having a baby.” Yeah the pair of them living a nice comfortable life, paid for out of money earned stitching up a totally innocent young man, and ensuring his young client served a totally unjust jail sentence. Fukkin disgrace. I don’t know how he and all the other pretend lawyers can live with themselves. Shame on the bloody lot of them. One day Wooldridge’s young child will grow up to know what his father really does for a living. I have a question for Nicholas Wooldridge - how would he like it if his child was targeted by the Masonic mafia, convicted and imprisoned on trumped up charges? Think about that for a minute Wooldridge. Isn’t it time you came clean? You should be the one in prison. You Wooldridge, and the lawyers and judges you are in cahoots with, are the fucking criminals. From page 17: “THE COURT: But there was also an expression from the Government about, "Summer is when people have vacations. We would

like to have one." MR. CAPIN: We would like to have one. We know our witnesses would like to have one, and jurors often like to have them.” Victims of the dirty conspiring masons like vacations too. They do not want to be, and do not deserve to be, locked up. The scumbags conspiring to pervert the course of justice should be banged up instead. From page 18: “MR. STAHL: Yes, your Honor. I have a scheduled vacation right before and then one in the middle of October.” Oh do you now, you toffee nosed twat. You will be locked up too [or worse] when the public know your game.

On page 22 the judge Woodcock says: I think a good portion of my professional life has been either observing or participating in one form or another in high-profile cases. As a newspaper reporter in Chicago and Washington.” A good portion of his professional life has been serving his Masonic paymasters and ensuring truth never sees the light of day, and innocent people face gross injustices. And: “I think for lawyers involved, maybe even judges involved and the press involved it is inconceivable that people are not reading every story, [said Woodcock, tongue in cheek, knowing full well the stories printed in the press are just that, stories i.e. they are far removed from the facts] but it is not inconceivable. People have lives of their own. The likes of this great pretender hope that people are too busy to pay much attention to what lying colluding Masonic controlled scum such as him and his ilk are doing to truth and justice in the courts. They are not spending a great deal of time reading all of this stuff or viewing it on TV.” He’s hoping folk are spending their time reading about it in the propaganda shit rags or viewing it on TV where there is also a disgusting perversion of the truth. He’s hoping not too many folk are reading the court papers; and he’s especially hoping folk are not scrutinising them. From page 37 Woody says: “This does not mean that you have these 17 subpoenas that go well beyond anything that is available for discovery and that seem to me to be nothing more than an effort, another effort, at reconsideration of discovery. So, back to the earlier question. If you think that you can show involuntariness by some other means than the defendants themselves, in short, if you are not relying on their affidavits, then I will consider it. But it is not going to be a case of, "Tell you what. We think we can do this by calling the Government's witnesses." Because you do not get to

do that, unless there is a foundation for it.” There is a foundation – it is called establishing facts i.e. the truth i.e. exposing a Masonic psy-op.

Page 43: “THE CLERK: This Honorable Court [the masons may kid themselves their courts are honourable, they’re the exact opposite; they’re Satanic. No court in the land is honourable in God’s eyes] is back in session. You may be seated. THE COURT: Well, just one housekeeping matter, and that is, the parties are expected to be here on time when we take a break. If you are not here, that is your fault. I will be in court when I say I will be in court. So, being outside for ten minutes past the time period is probably not a good idea, if your purpose is to represent your clients.” Fukkin up his arse twat. This prick has got delusions of grandeur. Just cos he’s sitting pretty in the Masonic matrix right now, does not mean that will always be the case. He doesn’t understand; God is not mocked. On page 44 Stahl says: “I'll talk about Mr. Kadyrbayev, in particular. We submitted a very detailed affidavit under oath about the circumstances of the seizure, the circumstances of the statements, the lack of voluntariness, the circumstances about understanding, the circumstances about holding an individual for 12 hours, and then going back the next day and seizing them again, using the Immigration's arrest, even though the FBI was working hand in glove.” Actually it is the masons who are all working hand in glove to protect their Masonic fiefdom. Special Wanker Walker again. On page 82 he says: “Thereafter, for 2 1/2 years I investigated public corruption matters [L.O.L. This wanker can’t investigate anything. He’s a Masonic suck-up. And what’s public corruption anyway? The corruption is Masonic] arising from the 1996 Presidential Election cycle. I was promoted to a position in the Criminal Investigator Division, the Violent Crimes and Major Offenders Section at FBI headquarters. A couple of years later I was promoted to a field supervisory position here in Boston, where I supervised a squad of the Boston Joint Terrorism Task Force.” Well no wonder crime is so high. And now a quick comment on snippets of the mainstream reporting on the convictions of these three friends; also my comments on a few C/O agents’ take on it. Take a look at Jimmy Shillama’s write up here https://jimmysllama.wordpress.com/2015/05/24/boston-trial-witnesses-day-10/ [scroll down ¼ of the page.] I quote: “So what did Jahar’s friends do exactly? On April 18, 2013, after the FBI released photos of

the “bombers,” Jahar’s friends went to his dorm room and removed his backpack which contained a handful of fireworks, Vaseline, a thumb drive and a homework assignment. They also removed his Sony VAIO laptop. After returning with Jahar’s things to their New Bedford apartment, Kadrybayev eventually put the backpack and its contents into the dumpster that evening. Yeah, I got it. They thought they were throwing out incriminating evidence like a few fireworks, which, inevitably contained no where near enough powder to make even a little, itty, bitty, baby bomb, and the Vaseline that Jahar had mentioned was used in bombs during a previous conversation with his friends. I don’t know, did any FBI bomb technicians testify at trial that they found traces of Vaseline in any of the bombs? Oh, that’s right. No. And did Jahar’s friends remove his cell phone from his UMass dorm room? No. Did they take and dispose of Jahar’s white hat seen in the FBI photos? No. Did they throw out Jahar’s laptop? No. They left it in plain sight on their dining room table and Christiana testified authorities confiscated it the day he was dispatched to the apartment on April 19, 2013. And: “Lastly, a Superseding Indictment filed on August 29, 2013, charged both Kadyrbayev and Tazhayakov with, “agreeing to knowingly alter, destroy, conceal, and cover up tangible objects belonging to Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, namely a laptop computer…” Is taking a laptop and setting it on top of your dining room table in plain view altering, destroying, concealing or covering it up? I guess according to authorities it is.” Of course that isn’t a crime, and of course the amount of firework powder that was in the backpack wouldn’t be enough to make even an itty bitty baby bomb; but if this was not a psy-op i.e. if Jahar was one of the marathon bombers and his friends had indeed gone to his room and removed said items, the FBI would be right to come down hard on them, as they had, for all intents and purposes, protected their friend Jahar, as they had not grassed him up to the authorities and had instead gone to his room and removed possible incriminating evidence. On top of that they had then attempted to dispose of this evidence, which appeared to be pretty damning – a backpack containing bomb explosive powder. So the charge against the friends that they had impeded an FBI terrorist investigation, had caused a substantial diversion of law enforcement resources, and had conspired to obstruct justice would be justified. If on top of that they had changed their stories i.e. lied, then that charge would be justified too. What Jimmy Shill is doing is what all the lawyers are doing – legitimizing the charges, thus keeping everything in the Masonic matrix. If Jimmy was not a cointelpro agent i.e. if he was a genuine voice for justice [of Jahar and his friends] he would be making the points

that I do. He doesn’t point out any contradictions, he doesn’t expose the lies of the FBI or any of the lawyers, he doesn’t ask any of the questions that I do, he doesn’t even say that these friends were set up; in short nothing he says will in any way help unravel the official story i.e. the Masonic conspiracy. Thus the truth remains firmly buried, and Jahar and his friends continue to suffer this gross injustice. All Jimmy is doing is reinforcing the message that the authorities can do whatever they want; and there is fuck all you can do about it. Course whilst Jimmy continues to serve his Masonic handlers he does not fear having to face some sort of injustice himself, since he is protected by the Masonic beast. I spell out exactly why Jimmy Shill earns his name in my ‘JIMMYSLLAMA’ pdf. http://sharonkilby.co.uk/site/JIMMYSLLAMA.php Now have a read of ‘His College Buddies’ https://gumshoenews.com/2015/12/12/open-letter-to-us-attorney-general-concerning-prisoner-tsarnaevs-sams/ [scroll down ¼ of the page.] I quote: “Dzhokhar texted one of the friends and said,

“you can go to my room and take what’s there”, meaning, you can go get my weed/marijuana. The friends then went to his room to do that. They decided to take a few other things, like a backpack with leftover fireworks which they had all been using a few weeks earlier, near the Charles River.” Again, Gumshoe are also only pointing out the unfairness of being convicted for simply taking some weed, a few fireworks, backpack etc – all harmless items. By failing to state, let alone prove these friends were fitted up on trumped up charges, Gumshoe are going along with the Masonic script, and thus legitimizing the charges. The Gumshoe shills, just like Jimmy Shill are saying nothing that could threaten the unravelling of the psy-op; thus ensuring Jahar and his friends will never find justice. I also explain why Gumshoe news is also a Masonic controlled disinfo blog in my pdf ‘THE BB PSY-OP – a closer look at the work of the COINTELPRO who are geared towards the savvier truth seekers’. http://sharonkilby.co.uk/site/THE_BB_PSY-OP_-_a_closer_look_at_the_work_of_the_COINTELPRO_who_are_geared_towards_the_savvier_truth_seekers.php I quote from the magiclougie disinfo blog: “Tsarnaev responded by telling him he could go to his dorm room and "take what's there." That's when Kadyrbayev went to Tsarnaev's room with two other friends. There, he and another man agreed to remove Tsarnaev's computer and a backpack containing fireworks that had been partially emptied of their explosive powder. [That’s the incriminating evidence; however no-one

will tell you that such ‘evidence’ was planted.] Kadyrbayev threw the backpack into a garbage dumpster. It was later recovered at a landfill after federal agents spent two days searching for it. In court Tuesday, Assistant U.S. Attorney Stephanie Siegmann said Kadyrbayev showed "callous disregard" for the victims of the bombings and law enforcement when he failed to report Tsarnaev's identity and removed evidence from his dorm room. Siegmann shows callous disregard for truth and justice. "He decided to get rid of the evidence to help his friend," Siegmann said. She hasn’t proven that though.

Siegmann quoted from a letter written by Collier's stepfather in which the family said they believe if Kadyrbayev had reported Tsarnaev's identity to authorities, he could possibly have prevented Collier's death. Siegmann knows that the FBI knew who the Tsarnaevs were; and as such the FBI allowed [or more accurately were a party to] Collier’s death. Numerous other people could have identified the Tsarnaev brothers to the authorities. They could have done this soon after 5 p.m on the 18th April when the ‘wanted’ posters were shown on TV. And it

turns out that some people did try to alert the authorities. However, and obviously, the masons weren’t interested in anyone else; their focus was on hanging the patsies. Confirmation of that comes from a friend of Jahar’s, Sierra Schwartz, who says in answer to the question – did you call authorities when you saw his picture on TV? “No because we were told at the time the media was wrong, and said he was someone else so a lot of my friends and I who recognised him just went back to bed.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pDNgUk1POc [2 h 41 mins.] Jaw dropping or what? You really couldn’t make this shit up. The following motion is the attempt of Dias’ lawyers to ‘PRECLUDE INTRODUCTION OF VICTIM IMPACT EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY’ http://ftpcontent2.worldnow.com/whdh/pdf/150529-kadyrbayev-collier.pdf

I quote from page 6, and comment: “All accounts reported that the Tsarnaevs murdered Officer Collier at approximately 10:30 p.m. There’s no evidence that either Tsarnaev brother murdered Collier or that they murdered anyone else. There’s no proof even that Collier was murdered at the time stated. As we now know, Jahar’s cellphone service had been turned off for lack of payment. That is what we’re told, of course. Jahar’s phone would have been turned off to prevent his friends or

family contacting him after he’d been lured or forced out of his dorm room, and ‘taken care of’ by elite Masonic agents. Thus, even if Dias or the others had immediately recognized that Jahar was or was likely involved around 10 p.m. when they were in his dorm room and discovered the items and notified law enforcement, and even if law enforcement immediately acted on this information, there was insufficient time for law enforcement to interview them, confirm the information and no way to track Jahar down before his fatal encounter with Officer Collier. It is simply a factual impossibility.” Course the lawyers are just going along with the script. I have shown where the factual impossibilities are. I have shown there is no evidence whatsoever to tie either Tsarnaev brother in any way to the Collier killing. I have shown that there is no evidence Collier was even murdered at the time stated or the place stated. ... and the other had a show of support from former Massachusetts Gov. Michael Dukakis. Dukakis is just another pathetic pretender; happy to let Jahar and his friends be scapegoated and do bird for something none of them had any part of whatsoever. Fucking disgrace. Where are all the independent thinking decent folk in the world??? Come on people, get off your lazy arses and do your own research. Kick ass over this. Or you’ll be next.

The judge said Phillipos was to blame for a "substantial diversion" of law enforcement resources. Woodcock is a traitorous skunk, up to his eyeballs in this vile psy-op. I can’t wait for the day he and his cronies are exposed for the filthy lying Masonic collaborators that they are.

"There's a price to be paid for the failure of responsibility," Judge Douglas Woodlock said. Yes there is Woody; and you will have to pay a high price in the not too distant future for your part in this shameful and scandalous Masonic conspiracy. Prosecutors had asked for a sentence of a little more than five years in prison. Phillipos' lawyers had asked for two years of home confinement. The prosecutors and the fake ‘defence’ lawyers will be getting a lot worse than prison time when the public en masse wake up to their part in this great deception.

Hours later, the Tsarnaev brothers fatally shot Massachusetts Institute of Technology police Officer Sean Collier [there’s no evidence that either Tsarnaev brother shot anyone] and had a wild shootout with police [there’s no evidence for that either] in Watertown.

David Archibald, one of the jurors who convicted Tazhayakov, attended the sentencing hearing and afterward said he believes Tazhayakov "got off easy." Archibald is either a Masonic insider, or he is a coward or he is of low intelligence. Archibald said he believes Tazhayakov might have prevented Collier's death if he had reported Tsarnaev to authorities immediately. "If he spoke up, the FBI would have had a good idea who they were looking for," he said. The government repeatedly showed the jury surveillance video of Tsarnaev dropping a backpack [I’d like to see that video] that contained one of the bombs behind the family of 8-year-old Martin Richard.” http://magiclougie.blogspot.co.uk/2015/06/boston-marathon-bombings-test-run-for.html More on the magiclougie disinfomongers on the above pdf. Boston’s propaganda station WBUR report: “As the clerk read the first verdict — "guilty" — there was a slight delay, then a loud sob pierced the silent courtroom as Tazhayakov's mother realized the enormity of the jury's unanimous decision. His father — who all along said he had faith in America's justice system and had pushed for a speedy trial and advised his son to reject a government plea deal — sat in stunned silence.” Aza’s parents have learned the hard way that there is no such thing as a justice system in America [the so-called land of the free] or any country. There cannot possibly be a justice system when the people who control it are unknown, unanswerable, devious, dishonest, evil, freemasonic servants of Satan. http://www.wbur.org/news/2014/07/22/azamat-tazhayakov-guilty-fbi The associated press say: “Kadyrbayev and Tazhayakov face conspiracy and obstruction of justice charges, which carry a penalty of up to 25 years in prison [I think all the judges and lawyers involved in the kangaroo trials of Jahar and his friends, the umpteen FBI agents and police officers and various other ‘witnesses’ [Masonic fools and tools] should be on trial for conspiracy and obstruction of justice ...] while a third man, Robel Phillipos of Cambridge, Massachusetts, faces a less serious charge of lying to investigators, which could mean a possible 16-year sentence.” What about all the lies told by all the slime balls in the court and in the media [and the ‘alternative media’]???

According to the media whores http://boston.cbslocal.com/2014/10/28/jury-enters-6th-day-of-deliberations-in-tsarnaev-friend-trial/ Carmen Ortiz said: “In the wake of one of the most significant events in this City’s modern history—an event which left two young women and a child dead, and

many more injured—thousands of ordinary citizens assisted law enforcement in identifying and locating the perpetrators. Today, a federal jury concluded that Robel Phillipos did just the opposite. He lied to agents when he could have helped. He concealed when he could have assisted. It is a crime to lie to law enforcement agents, and that is why Robel Phillipos was charged and why the jury found him guilty today.” Nauseating. I can’t wait for the day this Ortiz bitch and her cronies face justice for their crimes. The last word goes to the special Wanker Walker. On page 103 of ‘Day One Of Motion Hearing’ he says, “The Hostage Rescue Team, or HRT, is a large, full-time, highly professional tactical force that the FBI deploys when confronting its most significant criminal or terrorist threats. I say this at the risk of seeming to flatter the Agency. It is undoubtedly the World's finest Civilian Tactical Force. It includes members of the World's finest military tactical forces, and it has been employed in very, very high-level investigations over its 30-year history.” And on page 143, he says “I was a member of the FBI SWAT Team in the Portland Division when I was in Oregon, 1995 through 1997.” When asked if the SWAT Team for the Portland Division is different from the very elite unit, the HRT team, he says: “Yes. They are the varsity of the varsity. They are a selection process, two-week, think of SEAL Team Six, introduction, highly skilled group, full-time trained. We were part-time trained and part-time or infrequently deployed.” When asked if HRT train and deploy in high-risk situations i.e. to confirm they are “hardcore, real-deal guys” he replies “As I described, I think they are the World's finest Civilian Tactical Team, yes.” Wow lots of manpower, and the best of the best deployed to hunt down the Boston marathon bombers; and yet all they managed to catch was a completely innocent critically injured unarmed teenaged college student; meanwhile the real bombers are still at large! At the time of researching this bit of the Boston Marathon Bombing the numbers 33, 333 and 3333 were very prominent. I looked them up and found this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8g5-N91l-ZM and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ThhmkmcK4Qo According to http://www.angeltherapy.com/blog/true-meaning-33-and-333 “The number 3 refers to the Trinity, and means that you are receiving divine protection, help, and guidance. In most cases, if you are seeing a lot of 3's, this is an Angel Number sign that you have a close connection to Jesus, the son in the Holy Trinity. 33 means that Jesus is with you

and helping you. 333 means that Jesus is emphasizing the message that you've been receiving.” And http://www.sunsigns.org/angel-number-33-meaning/ “Angel Number 33 suggests that this is the perfect time to pursue your destiny. You are in the right position to take much larger risks, and the payoff will be worth it.” And http://sacredscribesangelnumbers.blogspot.co.uk/2010/08/angel-numbers-number-sequences_3889.html “The 3333 repeating number sequence indicates that the Ascended Masters and angels are near you at this time, reassuring you of their love, support and companionship. When you notice the Angel Number 3333 repeating to you, call upon the Ascended Masters and angels often. They are aware of your position or situation and know the best way to go about things for the highest good. They will help and guide you through your next life phase and wait for you to call upon them.” Wow; pretty powerful. So too the numbers 222 and 2222, and 111 which kept popping out at me. In a nutshell I learned “Your ideas, dreams, and thoughts are becoming a part of your natural life.”