Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
J. Richard Bird Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer &
Corporate Development
The Changing Energy Landscape:
New Market Access Initiatives TD Calgary Energy Conference
July 9, 2013
This presentation includes certain forward looking information (FLI) to provide Enbridge shareholders and
potential investors with information about Enbridge and management's assessment of its future plans and
operations, which may not be appropriate for other purposes. FLI is typically identified by words such as
"anticipate", "expect", "project", "estimate", "forecast", "plan", "intend", "target", "believe" and similar words
suggesting future outcomes or statements regarding an outlook. Although we believe that our FLI is reasonable
based on the information available today and processes used to prepare it, such statements are not guarantees
of future performance and you are cautioned against placing undue reliance on FLI. FLI inherently involves a
variety of assumptions, risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual results, levels of activity and
achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied in our FLI. Material assumptions include:
expected supply and demand for crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids; prices of crude oil, natural gas and
natural gas liquids; expected exchange rates; inflation; interest rates; availability and price of labour and pipeline
construction materials; operational reliability; customer project approvals; maintenance of support and regulatory
approvals for Enbridge’s projects; anticipated in-service dates and weather.
Our FLI is subject to risks and uncertainties pertaining to operating performance, regulatory parameters, project
approval and support, construction schedules, weather, economic and competitive conditions, exchange rates,
interest rates, commodity prices and supply and demand for commodities, including but not limited to those
discussed more extensively in our filings with Canadian and US securities regulators. The impact of any one risk,
uncertainty or factor on any particular FLI is not determinable with certainty as these are interdependent and our
future course of action depends on management's assessment of all information available at the relevant time.
Except to the extent required by law, we assume no obligation to publicly update or revise any FLI, whether as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise. All FLI in this presentation is expressly qualified in its
entirety by these cautionary statements.
This presentation may make reference to certain financial measures, such as adjusted net income, which are not
recognized under GAAP. Reconciliations to the most closely related GAAP measures are included in the MD&A
filings and/or Supplementary Financial Information available on our website or in the slides that accompany this
presentation, if applicable. 2
Legal Notice
3
Enbridge’s Energy Infrastructure Asset Base
Toronto
Quebec City
Gas Distribution
Norman
Wells
Zama
Fort McMurray
Portland
Casper
Montreal
Salt Lake City
Patoka
Cushing
Houston
Superior
Clearbrook
Edmonton Hardisty
Toronto
Chicago
Liquids Pipelines
Edmonton
Fort St. John
Houston
Chicago
Sarnia
Gas Pipelines
Toronto
Edmonton
Renewable Energy
2012
Adjusted
Earnings
2012
Adjusted
Earnings
2012
Adjusted
Earnings
2012
Adjusted
Earnings
65%
15%
Wind Power Generation
Waste Heat Recovery
Solar Power Generation
Geothermal Power Generation
Power Transmission
16%
15% 4%
65%
4
16%
20% 19%
7%
1%
9%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
1 Year 5 Year 10 Year
To
tal S
ha
reh
old
er
Re
turn
CA
GR
Enbridge Inc.
S&P/TSX Composite Index
Enbridge Performance Relative to S&P/TSX Composite Index As at December 31, 2012
89% 100% 96% North American
Peer Group Percentile
Strong Value Creation Track Record
5
-2.1 -1.7
-0.5
+0.4 +0.4
+1.5 +1.5
+2.9 +3.3
+4.1
+7.4
-4.0
-2.0
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
OECDEurope
OECDAmerica
OECDAsia
Oceania
Russia OtherEurasia
LatinAmerica
MiddleEast &Africa
OtherAsia
OPEC India China
MMbpd
Source: Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries. “World Oil Outlook “. 2012.
Global Incremental Oil Demand (2010 – 2030)
6
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
Oil Sands Conv. Heavy Conv. Light and Medium Pentanes/Condensate
MMbpd
3.3 MMbpd
Source: Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers. “Crude Oil: Forecast, Markets & Transportation”. June 2013.
Canadian Oil Production Forecast
7
*Brent price is a landed price on US East Coast/ US Gulf Coast.
Assumed tanker freight cost of US$2.00 per bbl.
$100
$104
$109
$92
$111
WCS
Asia
Maya
$94
WTI
Bakken
Light
Brent*
LLS
Pricing based on YTD 2013 - Daily Average
As at June 26, 2013 (USD per barrel)
Light Crude
Heavy Crude
$72
North American Crude Oil Differentials
$90
EDM
Light
8
Western Canada & Bakken
– Pipelines Export Capacity versus Export Supply
Western Cdn Refineries, 586 (AVG)
TMPL, 260
W. Access, 450
Clearbrook/Superior, 300
ENB - Ex Superior, 1930
KSL, 590
XL, 525
NGP, 525
TMX, 550
TCPL EA, 600
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Vo
lum
e (
KB
PD
)
ENB - Ex Superior, 2730
Source: Enbridge Internal Forecast
9
Lloydminster
Edmonton
Cold Lake
Hardisty Hub
Cheecham
Terminal
Nexen (Long Lake)
Suncor (MacKay River)
ConocoPhillips (Surmont)
Suncor (Firebag)
Alberta
Husky (Sunrise)
Imperial Oil (Kearl)
Waupisoo Pipeline (up to 580 kbpd)
Athabasca Pipeline (up to 600 kbpd)
Project Connections
Athabasca Twin Pipeline (initially 450 kbpd)
Cenovus (Christina Lake)
Statoil (Leismer)
Fort
McMurray
Woodland Pipeline Extension
4
5
3 2
1
6
7
9
AOC (Hangingstone)
8
• Significant competitive position
− Largest regional operator
− Dual hub deliverability
− Bridging capacity
• 9 commercially secured growth
projects in-service by 2016
− $3.9 billion investment
• Potential additional
opportunities
− $3.7 billion
10
Liquids Pipelines
– Alberta Regional Infrastructure
Wood Buffalo Pipeline
Montreal Gretna
Regina
Hardisty
Kerrobert
Toledo
Buffalo
Edmonton
Houston
Fort
McMurray
Cromer
Cushing
Patoka
Chicago/
Flanagan
Sarnia
Superior
Port Arthur
Westover
+585
kbpd
+300
kbpd
+440
kbpd
+80
kbpd
+320
kpbd
10
2013 • Line 5 Expansion (+50 kbpd)
• Line 62 Expansion (+105 kbpd)
• Line 9A Reversal (+50 kbpd)
• Toledo Pipeline Partial Twin (+80 kbpd)
• Seaway Pipeline Expansion (+400 kbpd)
2014 • Line 6B Replacement (+260 kbpd)
• Line 9B Reversal + Expansion (+320 kbpd)
• Flanagan South Pipeline (+585 kbpd)
• Seaway Pipeline Twin + Lateral (+450 kbpd)
• Alberta Clipper (+120 kbpd)
• Southern Access (+160 kbpd)
2015 • Southern Access Extension (+300 kbpd)
• Eastern U.S. Gulf Coast Access (+440 kbpd)
• Edmonton to Hardisty (+570 kbpd)
• Alberta Clipper (+230 kbpd)
• Southern Access (+640 kbpd)
• Chicago Area Connectivity (+570 kbpd)
2016 • Sandpiper Pipeline (+225/+375 kbpd)
• Line 6B Expansion (+75 kbpd)
Liquids Pipelines (Enterprise Wide)
– Mainline System, Market Access Extensions/Expansions
Gulf Coast Access/ Eastern Access/ Light Oil Market Access Programs Opening New
Continental Markets for up to 1.7 MMbpd
~$17 Billion Investment Commercially Secured
Liquids Pipelines
– East Coast Market Access
11
Canadian and U.S. East Coast Refinery Markets
Liquids Pipelines
– West Coast Market Access
Current Status:
• Positive TERMPOL report
• JRP hearing concluded
• 60% R-O-W First Nations support
Next 12 Months:
• Satisfy B.C. 5 conditions
• Additional R-O-W First Nations support
• Coastal First Nations support
• JRP decision
• Federal aboriginal consultation/ Cabinet
decision 12
13
1
2012 – 2016 Enterprise Wide Growth Capital
* Unsecured growth capital is included in the funding plan
Commercially
Secured
$37 B
$28
Billion
Unsecured* $9
Billion
$3
$8
$9
$5
$3
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
Project Cost by In-Service Date (2012 -2016)
$, Billions
YTD ROY
An Exceptional Array of Attractive Investment Opportunities
Project / Program
Enbridge Inc.
Investment
($ Billions)
First Full
Year
Full Life
DCF ROE
Years to
Attain
Eastern Access1 $2.2 2014 low double digits 4
Western USGC Access2 $6.3 2015 low double digits 5
Light Oil Market Access1,2 $3.2 2016 low double digits 4
Edmonton to Hardisty Expansion1 $1.8 2016 low double digits 0
Tilted Return Profiles
14
1 Inclusive of supporting Canadian Mainline expansion capital and CTS effects.
2 Inclusive of 75% joint funding of U.S. Mainline components and CTS effects.
Enterprise Wide
– Secured Growth Capital by Return Profiles
15
Flat Profile
($ Billions)
Tilted Profile
($ Billions)
Liquids Pipelines
– Alberta Regional Infrastructure $1.4 $2.4
Liquids Pipelines
– Market Access Initiatives $7.7 $10.9
Gas Pipelines $2.0 $1.1
Gas Distribution $0.6 −
Green Power − $1.4
TOTAL $11.7 $15.8
16
$0.00
$3.00
2011 2016
Adjusted EPS* Growth
• Tilted Return Projects
• 2016 Risked Unsecured
• New Growth Platforms
• Sponsored Vehicle Drop Downs
* Adjusted earnings EPS is non-GAAP measures. For more information on non-GAAP measures please refer to disclosure in news releases.
Industry Leading Growth Outlook
• Exceptional array of attractive return investment opportunities
• Financial risk tightly managed
• Ample access to low cost funding sources
• Growing earnings and cash flows
Attractive investments low cost of capital
Industry leading growth
Substantial Valuation Upside
17
Investment Merits Summary