Upload
jennifer-maynard
View
224
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Teachers
August 2013
Training Module 3
The DPAS II Process
Training for Teachers
Training Overview
For separate modules:Module 1: Introduction to DPAS IIModule 2: DPAS II and the Delaware FrameworkModule 3: The DPAS II ProcessModule 4: Component Five – Student
Improvement
DRAFT
Materials for this module
Power Point Presentation DPAS II Guide for Teachershttp://www.doe.k12.de.us/csa/dpasii/default.shtml.
DRAFT
DPAS II: Process
Roster Identification Measures Selection Fall Conference Pre-Observation Conference Observation
DRAFT
DPAS II: Process (continued)
Post-Observation Conference Formative Feedback Documentation Summative Evaluation Conference Summative Evaluation Documentation
DRAFT
DPAS II: Process (continued)
Improvement PlansEffective 2013-2014, changes to Regulation 106A
modifies when an Improvement Plan must be developed versus may be developed.
Changes to Regulation also eliminate some requirements related to Professional Development completed by a teacher during an Improvement Plan.
The Challenge Process
DRAFT
Professional Responsibilities
Form completed in Fall Discussions held during pre and post-
observation conferences Discussion during summative evaluation
conference
DRAFT
Pre-observation
FormRequired for Novice TeachersMay be waived for Experienced Teachers
• Only if both the teacher and evaluator agree
ConferenceRequired for all announced observations – may
not be waivedDoes not apply to unannounced observationsWhenever possible, held in teacher’s classroom
or work area
DRAFT
Observations
Announced or Unannounced Length of observation Frequency of observations Limitations on when observations may occur Evidence collection
DRAFT
Post-observation Conference
Requirements Teacher Responsibilities
Lesson Reflection Template - optional
Timing
DRAFT
Formative Feedback
Requirements and Timeline Evidence Formative rating documentation How do rubric levels translate to Satisfactory
or Unsatisfactory performance?
DRAFT
Summative Evaluation
Requirements and Timelines Evidence Summative ratings Summative evaluation forms
DRAFT
Summative Ratings ChartTotal # of Satisfactory ratings in
Components I-IVComponent V Summative Rating
4/4 Exceeds Highly Effective
4/4 Satisfactory Effective
4/4 Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement
3/4 Exceeds Highly Effective
3/4 Satisfactory Effective
3/4 Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement
2/4 Exceeds Effective
2/4 Satisfactory Effective
2/4 Unsatisfactory Ineffective
1/4 Exceeds Needs Improvement
1/4 Satisfactory Needs Improvement
1/4 Unsatisfactory Ineffective
0/4 Exceeds Needs Improvement
0/4 Satisfactory Needs Improvement
0/4 Unsatisfactory Ineffective
DRAFT
Pattern of Ineffective Teaching
DPAS II Rating
Year I Year 2 Year 3
Ineffective Ineffective
Needs Improvement Ineffective Needs Improvement
Needs Improvement Needs Improvement Ineffective
Ineffective Needs Improvement Ineffective
Ineffective Needs Improvement Needs Improvement
Needs Improvement Ineffective Ineffective
DRAFT
Overall Feedback
Commendations Recommendations and expectations
Difference between expectations and recommendations
How expectations are communicatedHow evaluators asses teacher performance
toward expectation outcomesDocumenting completed expectations
Additional feedback
DRAFT
Challenge Process
Used when a teacher disagrees with the evaluator’s assessment
Different from Grievance (can only grieve process infractions)Must try to resolve difference with evaluator firstSubmit written challenge to evaluator’s supervisor
within 1 working days of receipt of evaluation document
Within 15 working days the supervisor of the evaluator must meet with the teacher
Within 15 work days the supervisor of the evaluator must issue a written decision
DRAFT
DOE monitoring of DPAS II
Annual audit of DPAS II formative and summative evaluation documentsConducted by DOE staffAll information is strictly confidentialUse of review criteria to ensure written evaluation
documents provide• Objective, specific, and relevant evidence of teacher
performance and areas for commendation• Supportive, specific, and actionable guidance, including
timelines, for any recommendations and/or expectations
DRAFT