Upload
buithien
View
221
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Economic Analysis of Industrial Plantations in Turkey
Tuğba DENİZ
Istanbul University, Faculty of Forestry
Department of Forest Economics
Outline
Introduction
Findings
Economic Aspects of Public Industrial Plantation Projects
Private Sector Industrial Plantation Projects
Academic Research Projects
Conclusions
3rd International Congress on Planted Forest, 15-18th May 2013, Porto 2
Introduction
Wood raw material demand is increasing.
Supply deficit in market.
The annual average of supply deficit is 1.3 million cubic meters.
Although Industrial Plantations are needed for reducing supply deficit, the number of Industrial Plantation Projects (IPP) are limited.
3rd International Congress on Planted Forest, 15-18th May 2013, Porto
3
The Economic Structure of IPP in Turkey
Plantation investments are planned technical, biological and economically.
Some technical, biological, and economic elements that affect annual benefit and cost data.
4
3rd International Congress on Planted Forest, 15-18th May 2013, Porto
Technical, biological, and economic elements
Tree species
Site index
Slope groups
Thinning
Pruning
Rotation period
Production technique (Labor or mechanization)
Product sale prices
Distance to markets
5
3rd International Congress on Planted Forest, 15-18th May 2013, Porto
Stages in planning a plantation project
Inventory and pre-etude
Feasibility report
Application project
6
3rd International Congress on Planted Forest, 15-18th May 2013, Porto
The Stages
The stage of inventory and pre-etude, field works
are made.
In feasibility stage, the most profitable one
among the project alternatives is selected.
At the final stage, the alternative which chosen is
put into practice as an application project.
7
3rd International Congress on Planted Forest, 15-18th May 2013, Porto
Criteria
Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR)
Net Present Value (NPV)
8
3rd International Congress on Planted Forest, 15-18th May 2013, Porto
IRR
IRR reflects profitability of investment.
Since IRR is a ratio criterion; it is not affected by the size of project.
IRR is suitable for ranking.
A decision is made by ranking according to profitability of projects at the end of economic analysis.
9
3rd International Congress on Planted Forest, 15-18th May 2013, Porto
Findings
Public Industrial Plantation Projects
Private Sector Industrial Plantation
Projects
Academic research projects
10
3rd International Congress on Planted Forest, 15-18th May 2013, Porto
Public IPP
Industrial Forestry Plantations: Turkey Project
(FO: DP/TUR/71/521) was supported by FAO.
11
3rd International Congress on Planted Forest, 15-18th May 2013, Porto
12
Table 1: The Profitability of industrial plantation with Pinus pinaster in Marmara Region *.
Site
Profitability
NPV
(at 8% discounted rate)
(TL/ha)
IRR
(percent)
Good 61 446 12.9
Average -872 7.85
* COOLING (1977) Industrial Forestry Plantations: Turkey, Final Report, United Nations Development Programme, Food and Agriculture Organization of The United Nations, FO:DP/TUR/71/521 Working Documents, Rome, Italy.
The expected revenues of the project were calculated.
The net revenues were obtained by deducting the harvesting and transporting costs from the gross revenues.
3rd International Congress on Planted Forest, 15-18th May 2013, Porto 13
Another industrial plantation project is Durusu Basin Plantation Project in Marmara Region.
In scope of the project, industrial plantations were established for several purposes such as wood supply, erosion control and range improvement.
Cost accounts and revenue accounts were calculated in the section of project economy of pre-feasibility report of the project.
At the same time, some important macro-economic criteria (added value, the effect of employment, foreign exchange retention) were accounted.
The probable non-market benefits (erosion control, tourism, etc.) which created by the project were mentioned but their values were not determined.
14
Private sector IPP
A pre-feasibility report was prepared by BİRLER
(1996) on fast growing forest plantation investments.
The purpose of the report prepared in a public institution is to help in making decision for investors who want to invest in Turkey.
15
3rd International Congress on Planted Forest, 15-18th May 2013, Porto
Slopes Economic parameters
Regions and Tree Species
Eastern Black
Sea Region
Pinus radiata
(Radiata pine)
Western Black
Sea and
Marmara
Regions
Pinus pinaster
(Maritime pine)
Aegean and
Mediterranean
Regions
Pinus brutia
(Red pine)
0-30 %
Annual Net Revenue (US$/ha/year) 1 543.08 984.48 893.21
NPV (US$/ha) 11 392.22 6 638.71 5 499.33
BCR (ratio) 4.82 2.96 2.66
IRR (%) 19.08 13.98 12.07
Wood production costs (US$/m3) 17.94 22.74 30.63
31-60 %
Annual Net Revenue (US$/ha/year) 1 319.23 801.89 676.89
NPV (US$/ha) 9 138.35 4 769.98 3 459.98
BCR (ratio) 3.18 1.74 1.34
IRR (%) 14.93 10.90 9.22
Wood production costs (US$/m3) 24.87 33.05 48.61
16
Table 2: The economic parameters of industrial plantation investments made with various tree species in different regions*
*Adapted from Birler (1996), A Pre-Feasibility Study for Fast Growing Forest Plantation Investments in Turkey, Istanbul.
The economical evaluation results in Table 2 indicated that Radiata pine (Pinus radiata) plantations were more profitable than others in the 0-30% and 31-60% slope conditions in the context of the criteria of NPV, IRR and BCR.
17
3rd International Congress on Planted Forest, 15-18th May 2013, Porto
Private Sector IPP
The second example is “The Project of Establishment and Development of Industrial Plantations” (2005) was conducted by Industrial Tree Farming Industry and Incorporated Company.
The data on economy of the project could not be obtained due to the privacy policy of the company.
3rd International Congress on Planted Forest, 15-18th May 2013, Porto
18
Academic Research Projects
Although the economic analysis in afforestation projects of state organizations has not place clearly and private projects on industrial afforestation are not enough, some researches in academic level were realized on it.
Economic analysis of some projects by DASDEMİR and SAHİN (2006), DURKAYA (2001), TUNÇTANER et.al (2012).
19
3rd International Congress on Planted Forest, 15-18th May 2013, Porto
20
Tree Species Site
Index
Rot.
(year)
Production
Technique
Optimal Situation Actual Situation
NPV ( TL/ha) IRR
(%)
BCR NPV (TL/ha) IRR
(%)
BCR
Red
Pin
e Good
27
Labor 3.798.752.761 8.55 3.41 1.823.402.325 4,10 1,64
Mechanization 3.887.685.711 8,82 3,61 1.866.089.141 4,23 1,73
Poor 33 Labor 630.625.424 4,28 1,40 302.700.199 2,05 0,67
Mechanization 719.558.364 4,52 1,48 345.388.015 2,16 0,71
Bla
ck P
ine Good 70
Labor 1.178.523.970 4,17 1,70 683.543.903 2,42 0.94
Mechanization 1.267.456.920 4,32 1,79 735.125.014 2,51 0,98
Poor 70 Labor -50.493.874 2,95 0,97 -29.286.447 1,71 0,53
Mechanization 384.390.476 3,07 1,02 222.946.476 1,78 0,56
Ma
riti
me
Pin
e
Good 25 Labor 10.295.444.146 12,78 7,53 8.339.309.758 10,35 6,10
Mechanization 10.384.377.096 13,09 7,97 8.203.657.906 10,34 6,30
Poor 35 Labor 1.496.528.505 5,22 1,95 1.21.188.089 4,23 1,58
Mechanization 1.586.461.455 5,43 2,06 1.252.514.549 4,29 1,63
Bee
ch Good
100 Labor -766.921.933 2.83 0.80 -766.921.933 2,83 0,80
Mechanization -677.988.983 2,85 0,82 -677988.983 2,85 0,82
Poor 120 Labor -3.053.973.439 1,76 0,22 -3.053.973.439 1,76 0,22
Mechanization -2.965.040.489 1,78 0,23 -2.965.040.489 1,78 0,23
Table 3: The values of NPV, IRR and BCR of plantations alternatives*
* Adapted from Daşdemir and Şahin (2006) “The Economic Analysis of Industrial Plantations Investments: Bartın Example”.
As you see from Table 3, when an investor use maritime pine in a good site and apply 25 years as rotation age, investor can reach the IRR bigger than 10%.
21
3rd International Congress on Planted Forest, 15-18th May 2013, Porto
22
Slo
pe
Gro
up
s
Maritime Pine I.Site
Index
Maritime Pine
II. Site Index
Radiata Pine
I.Site Index
Radiata Pine
II. Site Index
Red Pine
I.site Index
Red Pine
II.Site Index
Rot.
(year)
IRR
(%)
Rot.
(year)
IRR
(%)
Rot.
(year)
IRR
(%)
Rot.
(year)
IRR
(%)
Rot.
(year)
IRR
(%)
Rot.
(year)
IRR
(%)
1 11 18.72 21 9.81 22 11.65 30 8.55 - - - -
1 11 20.67 20 10.63 - - - - 22 9.44 29 5.91
1 12 16.99 23 9.05 23 10.88 31 8.03 - - - -
1 - - - - - - - - 23 8.26 31 5.12
1 11 20.81 20 10.69 21 12.50 29 912 22 9.49 29 5.94
2 13 14.99 24 8.08 25 9.91 32 7.30 - - - -
2 13 15.16 24 8.16 - - - - 24 7.21 33 4.35
2 13 14.52 25 7.88 25 9.71 32 7.15 - - - -
2 - - - - - - - 24 7.13 34 4.30
2 12 16.49 23 8.72 24 10.58 31 7.76 24 7.75 31 4.70
Table 4: The values of IRR of the industrial plantation project in Kerpe*.
*Adapted from Durkaya (2001), “Determination of Planning Principles and Suitable Sites for Industrial
Plantations”.
Results showed that when an investor use maritime pine in I.group slope and I.site index apply 11 years as rotation age, entrepreneur can reach the IRR bigger than 20%.
3rd International Congress on Planted Forest, 15-18th May 2013, Porto 23
24
Tree
species
Site
index
Rotation
(year)
Plantation
techniques
NPV
(US$/ha)
IRR
(%)
BCR
(ratio)
Pinus pinaster
(Maritime pine) Good 25
Mechanization 6.923 13.09 7.97
Labor 6.863 12.78 7.53
Bad 35
Mechanization 1.057 5.43 2.06
Labor 998 5.22 1.95
Fagus orientalis
(Oriental beech) Good 100
Mechanization -452 2.85 0.82
Labor -511 2.83 0.80
Bad 120
Mechanization -1.977 1.78 0.23
Labor -2.036 1.76 0.22
Table 5: NPV, IRR and BCR values for various variables (TUNÇTANER et.al, 2012).
The economic analysis results indicated that maritime pine plantations were more profitable than oriental beech in the conditions of good site index, 25 year rotation and mechanized in the context of the criteria of NPV, IRR and BCR.
25
Conclusions
Results showed that maritime pine investments are the most profitable in Turkey conditions.
The profitability rates are higher than the current interest rates in market. So, this projects are feasible in current conditions.
3rd International Congress on Planted Forest, 15-18th May 2013, Porto 26
Conclusions
Profitability analysis is only made Feasibility reports of industrial plantation investments in Turkey.
In application projects, only project costs are calculated. Hovewer, during implementation of projects, several revenues like weed sale, clear felling, thinning can be created. In addition to, there are some revenues created for environment. In order to evaluate in local and national scales, all revenues created during the project should be taken into account.
27
Conclusions
Industrial plantation projects have many benefits such as better protection by reducing the pressure on natural forests; reduction in dependence on foreign markets by meeting the growing need for raw materials, prevention of erosion, carbon sequestration, employment creation, contribution for rural development. It is possible their values by estimating with using several methods may be added into project revenues.
3rd International Congress on Planted Forest, 15-18th May 2013, Porto
28
Thank You So Much
29