Upload
michael-west
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
THE EDGE IN KNOWLEDGE
Changes in the Carnegie Classifications:
What They Mean for Colleges & Universities
Perry Deess Ph.D.Director of Institutional Research and Planning, NJIT
Annual Meeting of the Association of NJ Graduate SchoolsMarch 24, 2006
THE EDGE IN KNOWLEDGEA Little History
1970: The Carnegie Commission on Higher Education creates a classification system to serve its research program
1973: Classification published to assist research on higher education
1976, 1987, 1994, 2000: revised editions
2005-06: major revisionsClark Kerr
THE EDGE IN KNOWLEDGEOriginal Design Principles
Seek comparability with respect to: Functions of the institutions Characteristics of students and faculty
Use empirical data about what institutions do Secondary analysis of existing data
THE EDGE IN KNOWLEDGEWhy Was The Classification Changed?
Higher education has changed1970 framework has weaknesses
and blind spotsA single framework is not sufficientValue in acknowledging complexity
BIG REASONTo reduce competition based on the
classification system
THE EDGE IN KNOWLEDGESummary of Changes
Comprehensive (all-inclusive) schemes
Basic, with changes Instructional Program
Undergraduate Graduate
Student Profile Overall Undergraduate
Size & Setting
Elective (voluntary) schemes
Outreach & Community Engagement
Undergraduate Education Inquiry & Support
THE EDGE IN KNOWLEDGEBasic Classification
Associate’s: subcategoriesDoctorate-granting: index of research
activityMaster’s: finer distinctionsBaccalaureate: “liberal arts” to “arts &
sciences”Special focus: sharper definition
THE EDGE IN KNOWLEDGEDoctorate-granting: index of research activity
Doctoral institutions are a key area of competition
Three categories now Research universities—very high research activity Research universities—high research activity Doctoral/Research universities
THE EDGE IN KNOWLEDGEDefining Doctoral Institutions*(IPEDS based doctoral conferrals; professional doctorates not counted for the base of 20; research staff from NSF survey of Graduate Students and Postdoctorates in Science and Engineering )
“ The research index is based on the following correlates of research activity: research and development expenditures in science and engineering (NSF R&D survey); research and development expenditures in non-science and engineering fields; science and engineering research staff; and doctoral conferrals in humanities fields, social science fields science technology, engineering, and mathematics fields, and professional fields. These data were statistically combined using principal component analysis to create two indices of research activity. The first index was based on aggregate levels of these factors ,. The second index, of per-capita research activity, used the expenditure and staffing measures divided by the number of full time faculty members whose primary responsibilities were identified as research, instruction, or a combination of instruction, research and public service. (From IPEDS)”
THE EDGE IN KNOWLEDGEDefining Doctoral Institutions (continued)
“ The values in each index were then used to locate each institution on a two-dimensional graph (scatterplot). Each institution’s distance from a common reference point was calculated, and the results were used to assign institutions to three groups based on their distance from the reference point. Thus the aggregate and per-capita indices were considered equally such that institutions that were very high on either index were assigned to the “very high” group, while institutions that were high on one but (but very high on neither) were assigned to the ‘high’ group.”
[The Chronicle of Higher Education March 3, 2006]
THE EDGE IN KNOWLEDGEWhat does this mean? “Ain’t nobody gonna figger how ta game it.”
The point of this is to prevent competition and limit the explosion of doctoral programs for competition in a ranking system.
The system is fundamentally relational The mathematics are virtually inscrutable It IS competitive, but few schools will spend the
time to work out how to compete
THE EDGE IN KNOWLEDGEHow to game the doctoral ranking system?
Have a long talk with the people completing the NSF R&D Survey, the NSF Graduate Student and Post-doctorate Survey, and the IPEDS.
If they carefully and position the university based on the criteria described above they can maximize your chances of reaching a higher tier.
Remember you only need one VERY HIGH index score to achieve the VERY HIGH category.
THE EDGE IN KNOWLEDGEInstructional Program
Undergraduate Degree level Balance of arts &
sciences and professional fields
Correspondence with graduate programs
Graduate Degree levels Mix of offerings
Comprehensive Focused
THE EDGE IN KNOWLEDGEStudent Profile
Overall student profile
Mix of undergraduate and graduate/professional enrollments
Undergraduate profile
Proportion full- & part-time
Achievement characteristics of first-year students
Transfer-in percentage
THE EDGE IN KNOWLEDGESize and Setting
Total enrollment
Residential character
THE EDGE IN KNOWLEDGEElective (voluntary) Schemes
Outreach & community engagement Mix of outreach and
engagement activities
Undergraduate education inquiry & support Efforts to assess
undergraduate education Support for assessing & improving teaching & learning
THE EDGE IN KNOWLEDGEHow to do peer analysis? (cont.)
THE EDGE IN KNOWLEDGEHow to do peer analysis? (cont.)
THE EDGE IN KNOWLEDGE
THE EDGE IN KNOWLEDGE
THE EDGE IN KNOWLEDGE
THE EDGE IN KNOWLEDGE
THE EDGE IN KNOWLEDGE
THE EDGE IN KNOWLEDGE
THE EDGE IN KNOWLEDGE
THE EDGE IN KNOWLEDGE
THE EDGE IN KNOWLEDGE
THE EDGE IN KNOWLEDGE
THE EDGE IN KNOWLEDGEWhy was all of this done?
To facilitate peer analysisTo aid research To develop generally non-competitive
scalesTo encourage more sophisticated
ranking—particularly by US News
THE EDGE IN KNOWLEDGEAdvantages
ComplexityFlexibility
More nuanced classification Better matching of classification to purpose Possibilities for customization
Responsibility Make & justify choices
THE EDGE IN KNOWLEDGEHow to do peer analysis?
Start at this site:
http://www.carnegieclassification-preview.org/
How to do peer analysis? (cont.)
How to do peer analysis? (cont.)
THE EDGE IN KNOWLEDGEWhere to Learn More
www.carnegiefoundation.org/classifications
Copies of slides: http://www.njit.edu/v2/Directory/iresearch/index.html.htm
For more information contact: Perry Deess [email protected]