Upload
kevyn
View
24
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
THE EFFECT OF THE SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS ON THE DICE RESULTS SEEN BY THE MESONH MODEL M. A. Jiménez, P. Le Moigne and J. Cuxart. DICE workshop, 14-16 October 2013, Exeter (UK). SCM: MesoNH model ( Lafore et al., 1998 ) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
THE EFFECT OF THE SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS
ON THE DICE RESULTS SEEN BY THE MESONH MODEL
M. A. Jiménez, P. Le Moigne and J. Cuxart
DICE workshop, 14-16 October 2013, Exeter (UK)
SCM: MesoNH model (Lafore et al., 1998)
Turbulence (Cuxart et al., 2000), length scale (Bougeault and Lacarrere 1989)Radiation (ECMWF code called every time-step)Kessler microphysical scheme (vapor, cloud water and rain)Time step (300s for SCM and 20s for coupled runs)Vertical grid (Cuxart et al., 2007): 85 levels (3m resolution at lower levels, gradual stretching)
LSM: SURFEX (Masson et al., 2013)
ISBA 3 layersLand use: Ecoclimap at 1km resolution (Masson et al., 2003)
50% great plains crops and 50% rockies grasslandtotal vegetation fraction over the pixel = 0.73
root depth = 1.5m and total depth = 2m leaf area index = 1.46CLAY=0.24, SAND=0.38 from Harmonized World Soil Database (HWSD) at 1km resolution
RN
H LE
G
SURFACE ENERGY BUDGET (W/m2)SURFACE ENERGY BUDGET (W/m2)
CPL more humid (e and LWD large)
INT TURBINT RAD
Steeneveld et al 2006
M10m (m/s)
T2m (K)
T (10m) – T (2m)
TIME SERIESTIME SERIES
Q2m (kg/kg)
SCM – STAGE 1B SCM + SURFACE – STAGE 2
SCM – STAGE 1B SCM + SURFACE – STAGE 2
VEGETATION ROOT DEPTH
default 50% bare 50% vegetated
sfc=1cm, root=1.5m, total=2m
BARE 100% bare0 % vegetated
sfc=1cm, root=1.5m, total=2m
ROOT 50% bare50% vegetated
sfc=1cm, root=0.4m, total=0.6m
SENSITIVITY TESTSSENSITIVITY TESTS
LATENT HEAT FLUX (W/m2)
TESTING THE SURFACE SCHEMETESTING THE SURFACE SCHEME
SENSIBLE HEAT FLUX (W/m2)
RN (W/m2)
TESTING THE SCM modelTESTING THE SCM model
RN
LE
H
TESTING THE SCM modelTESTING THE SCM model
10m wind speed (m/s)
2m specific humidity (kg/kg)
2m temperature (K)
SCM CPL CPL (BARE GROUND) CPL (ROOT DEPTH)
SENSITIVITY TESTSSENSITIVITY TESTS
WIND SPEED(m/s)
WIND SPEED(m/s)
TKE(m2/s2)
SCM CPL CPL (BARE GROUND) CPL (ROOT DEPTH)
SENSITIVITY TESTSSENSITIVITY TESTS
POT. TEMPERATURE(K)
<w'T'>(Km/s)
SCM CPL CPL (BARE GROUND) CPL (ROOT DEPTH)
SENSITIVITY TESTSSENSITIVITY TESTS
SPEC. HUMIDITY(kg/kg)
<w'q'>(kg m/s)
SENSITIVITY TESTS SENSITIVITY TESTS vertical resolutionvertical resolution
default: 85 levels (3m at lower levels)test: 60 levels (10m at lower levels)
SENSITIVITY TESTS SENSITIVITY TESTS vertical resolutionvertical resolution
60 levels 85 levels (DICE)
wind speed (m/s)
potentialtemperature(K)
SUMMARY
1) SCM vs CPL * CPL is giving larger LE and smaller H than SCM
* T colder in CPL than in SCM although there are no significant differences on the wind speed
* CPL has more specific humidity than SCM
2) reducing the percentage of vegetation * LE and H become closer to observations * As a test case bare ground soil is taken but this is far from the reality...
3) reducing the root depths to a more realistic values * Improve H and LE is closer to observations than CPL or other tests* the humidity is reduced and the T2m is warmer than CPL, departing
from obs* the wind speed is not largely affected
4) vertical grid mesh* importance to properly reproduce the surface layer characteristics
QUESTIONS
1) Are there other surface parameters that might be interesting to check if they have realistic values?
2) Differences between models (CPL run)* surface characteristics* SCM parameterizations* which one is playing the most relevant role?
3) running all the models with the same surface parameters?Stage 1b: evaluating SCMStage 4(?): evaluating LSM
4) ...
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
RESEARCH PROJECT CGL2012-37416-C04-01
JAE-DOC contract