Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
THE EUROPEAN MARKET FOR EDUCATION IN STANDARDISATION: DEMAND AND SUPPLY
Knut BlindProfessor for Innovation Economics at the Technische Universität of Berlin
in collaboration with the Fraunhofer Institute for Open Communication Systems
“Boosting ICT Business and Innovation: A Comprehensive Approach to Standardisation Education in Europe"
4-5 October 2018ETSI
2
1. Background
2. The Demand Side
3. The Supply Side
4. Ideas to Trigger the Market
© Fraunhofer FOKUS
CONTENT
3
The EC has repeatedly been pointing to the need to improve the education regarding standardisation (COM (2011) 311). Recently this need was confirmed by the "Joint Initiative on Standardisation (JIS)" of the public and the private partners in the European Standardisation System (COM (2016) 358). The JIS called for actions "to explore and promote standardisation as an element of formal education and academic … training" (domain 1/action 3).
Finding explanations for the paradox that the economic importance of standardisation is meanwhile undisputed both at the macro and the micro level, whereas research and especially education on standardisation is rare or absent.
© Fraunhofer FOKUS
BACKGROUND
©M
atth
ias H
eyde
/ Fr
aunh
ofer
FO
KU
S
5
Identification of job profiles for which the present European employment market requests standardisation-related competency.
Subgoals: • to identify job profiles for which the market demands standardisation-related
competency of job candidates by analysing the state of research • to identify "job profiles" for which the European employment market requests
standardisation-related competency as essential or optional asset for recruitment by conducting a field study.
© Fraunhofer FOKUS
THE DEMAND SIDE
©M
atth
ias H
eyde
/ Fr
aunh
ofer
FO
KU
S
Source: Blind and Drechsler 2017
6© Fraunhofer FOKUS
APPROACH OF FIELD SURVEY
Source: Blind and Drechsler 2017
7
1. Collecting and analyzing Linkedin Data of experts in order to identify the most relevant
sectors and countries, the most relevant field of studies, the correlation with other
competencies and the most common job descriptions.
How can we find experts in LinkedIn?
1. Searching for groups in LinkedIn with focus on standardisation
2. Searching for people with the term „standardisation“ in their profile
© Fraunhofer FOKUS
FIELD SURVEY – LINKEDIN
Source: Blind and Drechsler 2017
8© Fraunhofer FOKUS
FIELD SURVEY – LINKEDIN
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
CountryN=270
Source: Blind and Drechsler 2017
9© Fraunhofer FOKUS
FIELD SURVEY – LINKEDIN
66%
9%
16%
9%
Master/ Diplom Bachelor PhD Others
Degree of study:
55%
10%
12%
5%
18%
Fields of study
Engineering Management Else Sciences IT
Source: Blind and Drechsler 2017
10© Fraunhofer FOKUS
FIELD SURVEY – LINKEDIN
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40Knowledge, skills and competencies
Source: Blind and Drechsler 2017
12
2. Collecting and analyzing 300 job offers across Europe in order to identify the most important
competencies, skills and training requirements of these professionals from an HR perspective
as well as entry requirements to these jobs.
How to research for job offers?
© Fraunhofer FOKUS
FIELD SURVEY – JOB OFFER ANALYSIS
Source: Blind and Drechsler 2017
14© Fraunhofer FOKUS
FIELD SURVEY – JOB OFFER ANALYSIS
84
353329 2 211611 9 8 7 7 4 3 3 3 2 2 1 10
20
40
60
80
100
Ger
man
yG
reat
Brit
ain
Fran
ceSw
itzer
land
Italy
Rus
sia
Spai
nBe
lgiu
mN
orw
ayD
enm
ark
Hun
gary
Net
herla
nds
Pola
ndC
zech
Rep
ublic
Ukr
aine
Swed
enAu
stria
Portu
gal
Luxe
mbo
urg
Finl
and
Countries
0102030405060
ITEl
ectri
csM
echa
nics
Auto
mot
ive
Hea
lth S
ervi
ces
Com
mun
icat
ion
Bank
ing
Aero
spac
ehu
man
reso
urce
sPh
arm
acy
Supp
lyC
onst
ruct
ion
Con
sum
erM
arke
ting
Trai
dFo
odR
esea
rch
Auto
mat
ion
Pack
agin
gLa
wel
se
Sectors
Who is searching employees in standardisation?
Source: Blind and Drechsler 2017
15© Fraunhofer FOKUS
FIELD SURVEY – JOB OFFER ANALYSIS
68%
21%
2%9%
Job Titles
Technical Titel
Business Title
Programmer IT
Else
Examples:Cluster Job title
Technical title Engineer Standardisation/ CE-Management
Business title Finance Analyst
Programmer IT Developer Java
Else Layouter
• Just a few job titles include the term standardisation.
• There are no generally used job profile terms.
• Standardisation is mostly just part of the professional activity.
63%
33%
4%
Proportion of standardization within the professional activity
0,33
0,66
1
Source: Blind and Drechsler 2017
17© Fraunhofer FOKUS
FIELD SURVEY – JOB OFFER ANALYSIS
4942
31
2015 14 13
6
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Soft Skills
45%
31%
24%
Hard Skills
Technical Skills
Business Skills
IT Skills
Cluster Examples
Technical skills fluid construction, 3D CAD, automation
Business Skills Lean Management
IT Skills Software development, C#, softwarepackagesEspecially required hard skills are very job-specific.
No general statement possible.
Source: Blind and Drechsler 2017
18
1. The most important fields of study for standardisation are engineering and scientificsciences
2. Employees in standardisation have a university degree, mostly a Masters degree.
3. Employees in standardisation mostly have professional experience before gettinginvolved in standardisation activities.
4. Required hard skills are job – specific.
© Fraunhofer FOKUS
INTERIM CONCLUSION JOB OFFER AND LINKEDIN ANALYSIS
Source: Blind and Drechsler 2017
19
Performance of a survey with the target to validate and differentiate the findings of the previous
sub studies in order to identify statistical significant differences between sectors, companies, job types,
small and large companies.
Survey period between middle of May and middle of June 2017
Target audience: LinkedIn Contacts, LinkedIN Groups, Participants of EC workshop in may 2017
Feedback: more than 450 answers with 193 completely filled out questionnaires
© Fraunhofer FOKUS
FIELD SURVEY – ONLINE SURVEY
Source: Blind and Drechsler 2017
20© Fraunhofer FOKUS
SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: COMPANY CHARACTERISTICS
67
42
23 20 18 16 15 14 13 12 8 7
01020304050607080
N = 255
Sector Company size
N = 256
Source: Blind and Drechsler 2017
21© Fraunhofer FOKUS
SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: COMPANY CHARACTERISTICS
Business unit
88
4333
2314 14 14
9 8 72
0
20
40
60
80
100
N = 255
Source: Blind and Drechsler 2017
23© Fraunhofer FOKUS
SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS: EDUCATION
N = 280
Degree of study Fields of study
• Most participants hold a masters degree
• The most important fields of study are in engineering and IT
N = 247
Source: Blind and Drechsler 2017
24© Fraunhofer FOKUS
STANDARDISATION ACTIVITIES OF THE COMPANYAre you involved in external standardisation activities outside your company?
In which standardisation organization are you active?
Yes64%
No30%
Only in the past6%
Yes No Only in the past
N = 243 111
79 78
35
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Formal standardisationbodies at the national level
Formal standardisationbodies at the EuropeanlevelFormal standardisationbodies at the internationallevelIn consortia or fora
N = 155
Source: Blind and Drechsler 2017
26© Fraunhofer FOKUS
COMPETENCIES TO EVALUATE1. To know the basic terms used in standards and standardisation
2. To be able to identify the need for standards
3. To be able to search for and select appropriate standards
4. To be able to implement standards in product or process development
5. To be able understand the impact of implementing standards
6. To know the standardisation institutions and their processes
7. To be able to identify the need for getting involved in standardisation
8. To be able to search for and select appropriate standardisation organisations
9. To be able to be passively involved in standardisation processes (observer)
10. To be able to be actively involved in standardisation processes (participant)
11. To be able to judge which form of standardisation (formal vs. consortial) is appropriate
12. To be able to propose new work items in standardisation
13. To be able to strategically influence the agenda in standardisation processes
14. To be able to understand the impact of standardisation processes
Question 1:How relevant are the following competences for handling your work tasks?
Question 2:To what extent are the competences gained at higher or other education institutions insufficient in handling work tasks?
1 42 3
Not relevant Essential
Sufficient Insufficient
Source: Blind and Drechsler 2017
27
123456789
1011121314
1 2 3 4
How relevant are the following competences for handling your work
tasks?
123456789
1011121314
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
To what extent are the competences gained at higher or other education institutions insufficient in handling
work tasks?
© Fraunhofer FOKUS
RELEVANCE OF COMPETENCES
N >= 202
1. To know the basic terms used in standards and standardisation
2. To be able to identify the need for standards3. To be able to search for and select appropriate standards4. To be able to implement standards in product or process
development5. To be able understand the impact of implementing standards6. To know the standardisation institutions and their processes7. To be able to identify the need for getting involved in
standardisation8. To be able to search for and select appropriate
standardisation organisations9. To be able to be passively involved in standardisation
processes (observer)10. To be able to be actively involved in standardisation
processes (participant)11. To be able to judge which form of standardisation (formal vs.
consortial) is appropriate12. To be able to propose new work items in standardisation13. To be able to strategically influence the agenda in
standardisation processes14. To be able to understand the impact of standardisation
processes N >= 128
Source: Blind and Drechsler 2017
28
Yes No
© Fraunhofer FOKUS
EDUCATION IN STANDARDISATION
N = 197
Were you specifically trained by your employer to work in the area of standardisation?
Yes No N = 197
Should education provided by higher or other education institutions include competencies with regards to standards and standardisation?
Source: Blind and Drechsler 2017
29
1. There are employees acitve in standardisation
2. Experts with competencies in standardisation are searched for
3. Various competencies related to standardisation are needed
4. Competencies gained at higher or other education institutions are insufficient for handling work tasks related to standardisation
= There is a demand for education on standardisation in Europe
© Fraunhofer FOKUS
CONCLUSION ABOUT THE DEMAND FOR EDUCATION
30
• Identification of drivers and barriers for offering education on standardisation• Evaluating and discussing solutions
© Fraunhofer FOKUS
THE SUPPLY SIDE
©M
atth
ias H
eyde
/ Fr
aunh
ofer
FO
KU
S
32© Fraunhofer FOKUS
SURVEY APPROACH
EURAS Mailing List460
SIIT Maling List270
Identification of around500 European
researchers in 8 different fields with at
least 3 scientificpublications on
standardisation since2000
Around 3000 top researchers, among
around 1000 European researchers
Survey of motives and barriers related to research and educationin the field of standardisation
Expert Workshop: Discussion of results and recommendations of actions
33
Performance of a survey based on the review of the literature and a pilot version commented by 10
experts with the target to identify motives and barriers related to conducting research and
performing education in standardization.
Survey period between the beginning of February to end of March 2018
Feedback: almost 300 answers with more than 150 completely filled out questionnaires including many
comments in the open questions about drivers, barriers and solutions
© Fraunhofer FOKUS
FIELD SURVEY – ONLINE SURVEY
34© Fraunhofer FOKUS
RESPONDENTS’ DISCIPLINE(S) WITH HIGHEST DEGREE
other; 35
Engineering other; 16
Biology/ Biotechnology; 15
Electrical Engineering; 15
Computer Science; 14
Medicine/ Medical Science; 13IT; 12Chemistry; 12
Law; 12
Physics; 11
Business; 9
Mechanical Engineering; 9
Health Science; 8
Economics; 8
Industrial Engeneering; 8
Mathematics; 7
Psychology/ Cognitive Science; 6
Sociology; 5
Management; 5
Research & Education; 4Environmental Sciences; 3 Standardization; 3
Geography; 3
Neuroscience; 2
Literature; 2
35© Fraunhofer FOKUS
RESPONDENTS’ COUNTRY IN WHICH HIGHEST DEGREE BEEN COMPLETED
Europe; 204
North America; 23
Asia; 7South America; 3 Africa; 2 Australia; 1Austria; 3 Brazil; 3 Denmark; 4
Finland; 3
France; 11
Germany; 43
Greece; 3Ireland; 29
Italy; 13
Portugal; 5Romania; 3Serbia; 3
Spain; 13
Sweden; 6
Switzerland; 13
The Netherlands; 29
United Kingdom; 14
United States; 19
other; 23
37© Fraunhofer FOKUS
COUNTRY IN WHICH HEI OR PRO LOCATED
Europe; 143
North America; 18
Asia; 5South America; 3 Africa; 2
Australia; 1
Others; 23Brazil; 3
Denmark; 4
France; 4
Germany; 23
Ireland; 24
Italy; 10
Portugal; 3Serbia; 4
Spain; 10Sweden; 5
Switzerland; 6
The Netherlands; 20
United Kingdom; 15
United States; 16
38
Research (Basic/Applied)40%
Teaching (Undergraduate/graduate)
25%
Administration16%
Other19%
© Fraunhofer FOKUS
DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONDENTS’ RESPONSIBILITIES
42© Fraunhofer FOKUS
ACTIVITIES IN RESEARCH AND EDUCATION RELATED TO STANDARDISATION IN THE LAST 5 YEARS
110
101
89
32
49
101
31
71
80
91
149
132
80
150
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Conducting research on the topic of standardisation
Conducting research that served as an input for a standardisation process
Inclusion of standardisation as a topic in a course
Offering a program that specifically covers the topic of standardisation
Offering courses that specifically cover the topic of standardisation
Contribution to the development of a standard
Application for a patent
Yes No
43
9
717
© Fraunhofer FOKUS
ACTIVITIES IN RESEARCH AND EDUCATION RELATED TO STANDARDISATION IN THE LAST 5 YEARS
Contribution to a standard Teaching
Research
23 21
4
57
58© Fraunhofer FOKUS
ACTUAL OR POSSIBLE DRIVERS FOR OFFERING COURSES ON STANDARDISATION
very irrelevant [1] to very relevant [5]
148
147
147
147
147
146
146
147
148
148
Synergies with own research
Actively contributing to standardisation work
Topic is interesting per se
Multidisciplinarity in teaching
Establishing links to industry
Demand from industry
Positive feedback from students
High demand from students
HEI/PRO requires it
Financial incentives
3 2
3 3
3 4
3 5
3 6
3 7
3 8
3 9
4 0
4 1
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0
61© Fraunhofer FOKUS
BARRIERS FOR OFFERING COURSES ON STANDARDISATION
very irrelevant [1] to very relevant [5]
141
140
140
139
141
140
140
Alternative topics are more interesting for the students
Curricula does not allow further topics
Faculty does not support it
Alternative topics are more interesting for me
Industry does not demand it
No teaching material available
No synergy with own research
4 2
4 3
4 4
4 5
4 6
4 7
4 8
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0
64© Fraunhofer FOKUS
SOLUTIONS TO FOSTER MORE EDUCATION ON STANDARDISATION
least useful [1] to most useful [5]
140
140
140
141
141
141
140
142
141
More support from industry
Embedding standardisation within the theories of other academic disciplines
More support (information and data) from standardisation organisations
More demand from industry
Higher relevance for career
Closer link to the standardisation community
More demand from students
More support from own faculty
Personal financial incentives
4 9
5 0
5 1
5 2
5 3
5 4
5 5
5 6
5 7
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0
67© Fraunhofer FOKUS
HOW RELEVANT DO YOU THINK THE FOLLOWING COMPETENCES RELATED TO STANDARDISATION ARE,
FOR HANDLING THE SUBSEQUENT/FUTURE WORK TASKS OF YOUR GRADUATED STUDENTS
least relevant [1] most relevant [5]
137
139
139
138
139
136
137
138
138
138
136
138
137139
To be able to identify the need for standards
To know the basic terms used in standards and standardisation
To be able understand the impact of implementing standards
To be able to search for and select appropriate standards
To be able to understand the impact of standardisation processes
To be able to implement standards in product or process development
To be able to identify the need for getting involved in standardisation
To know the standardisation institutions and their processes
To be able to search for and select appropriate standardisation organisations
To be able to judge which form of standardisation (formal vs. consortial) is appropriate
To be able to be actively involved in standardisation processes (participant)
To be able to propose new work items in standardisation
To be able to strategically influence the agenda in standardisation processes
To be able to be passively involved in standardisation processes (observer)
5 8
5 9
6 0
6 1
6 2
6 3
6 4
6 5
6 6
6 7
6 8
6 9
7 0
7 1
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0
68© Fraunhofer FOKUS
HOW RELEVANT DO YOU THINK THE FOLLOWING COMPETENCES RELATED TO STANDARDISATION ARE,
FOR HANDLING THE SUBSEQUENT/FUTURE WORK TASKS OF YOUR GRADUATED STUDENTS
2018: least relevant [1] most relevant [5]2017: Not relevant for handling my work tasks [1] Indispensable for handling my work tasks [4], data scaled up to 1-5
137
139
139
138
139
136
137
138
138
138
136
138
137139
To know the basic terms used in standards and standardisation
To be able to identify the need for standards
To be able to search for and select appropriate standards
To be able to implement standards in product or process development
To be able understand the impact of implementing standards
To know the standardisation institutions and their processes
To be able to identify the need for getting involved in standardisation
To be able to search for and select appropriate standardisation organisations
To be able to be passively involved in standardisation processes (observer)
To be able to be actively involved in standardisation processes (participant)
To be able to judge which form of standardisation (formal vs. consortial) is appropriate
To be able to propose new work items in standardisation
To be able to strategically influence the agenda in standardisation processesTo be able to understand the impact of standardisation processes
209
208
207
206
206
203
202
202
202
202
202
202
203203
5 8
5 9
6 0
6 1
6 2
6 3
6 4
6 5
6 6
6 7
6 8
6 9
7 0
7 1
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0
Motives and Barriers for Education and Research in Standardisation (2018) European Market Needs for Education in Standardisation (2017)
69
− Major drivers for education on standardisation are synergies with research, contributing
to standardisation, topic per se, multidisciplinary and eventually links to and demand from
industry
− Major barriers are missing interests by students and support of faculty which makes the
integration of standardisation into curricula difficult
− More support/demand from industry, but also support by SDOs are perceived as useful
solutions, but also “homework” for researchers is embedding standardisation into the
theories of other academic disciplines
© Fraunhofer FOKUS
SUMMARY: EDUCATION
70
− Major drivers for research on standardisation is knowledge exchange and transfer, but
also contribution to public welfare in general and standardisation in particular
− Major barriers are missing internal and external appreciation
− More public, but also private funding as preferred solutions accompanied by changing
internal governance and support by SDOs
© Fraunhofer FOKUS
SUMMARY: RESEARCH
71
− Strong intrinsic motivation of experts involved in standardisation, doing research about
standardisation and teach about standardisation
− Synergies between research and education on standardisation
− Synergies between standardisation, conformity assessment and metrology within the
whole Quality Infrastructure
− Some synergies with active involvement in standardisation (being one form of
collaboration with companies)
− However: content provided in education on standardisation reflects the needs of industry
© Fraunhofer FOKUS
SUMMARY IN GENERAL
74© Fraunhofer FOKUS
ACTORS IN THE ECOSYSTEM OF RESEARCH, EDUCATION AND STANDARDISATION AND THEIR LINKS
Research results
Industry
Other stake-holders
ResearchPROs
TeachingHEIs
SDOs
Standards
Requirements Research results
Standards
Graduates
Graduates
Require-ments
Standards
Graduates StudentsRequire-ments
Public Sector
Standards
Require-ments
76
1. promote visibility of standardisation as subject for research and education
2. develop common comprehensive theoretical framework as basis for further research
3. introduce basic modules about standardisation focusing on the main elements
4. teach teachers in secondary and tertiary schools
5. measures should address both actors performing standardisation-related research and
education, but also consider their activities in standardisation as contribution to public goods
© Fraunhofer FOKUS
RECOMMENDATIONS I
77
6. consider synergies with conformity assessment and metrology
7. standardisation as part of university curricula and programmes supporting entrepreneurship
8. integrate the resources and expertise already available at SDOs
9. all stakeholders, incl. SDOs, have to signal explicitly their demand for educated graduates
10. PROs and HEIs have to adapt their incentives schemes and governance
11. longterm support for the development of eco-system involving all stakeholders
© Fraunhofer FOKUS
RECOMMENDATIONS II
78
Knut Blind Fraunhofer FOKUS & Technical University of BerlinMAR 2-5 Marchstraße 2310587 BerlinGermanyPhone: +49 30-314-76638Fax: +49 30-314-76638 e-mail: [email protected] WEB: http://inno.tu-berlin.deTwitter: @KnutBlind
© Fraunhofer FOKUS
CONTACT