Upload
erick-perry
View
222
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The False Promise of
SPLATs
(Strategically Placed Area Treatments )
By George Terhune
The SPLAT Strategy
SPLATs are based on the “Finney Effect,” a theoretical concept from the paper
Design of Regular Landscape Fuel Treatment Patterns for Modifying Fire
Growth and Behavior
by Mark A. FinneyResearch Forester
USDA Forest ServiceRocky Mountain Research Station
The “Finney Effect”
A well defined pattern of area treatments can:
• Slow the fire in treated units, • Cause the fire to zig-zag around treatments,
and thus• Slow the overall forward spread rate, and• Moderate fire effects in both treated and
untreated areas.
“The maximum effect on the forward spread rate…
occurs when the treatment units cause the fire to spread
through them at the same rate as it spreads around them.”
( Finney, 1998 )
Finney’s Examples
a. No Treatment.
b. Continuous lines.
c. “Lattice” Finney.
d. “Herringbone” Finney.
In b, c, and d, 19% of the landscape is treated.
Treated area Rate of Spread is 1 / 10 of ROS in the untreated matrix.
a b
c d
Disconnected vs Continuous
Effectiveness of a “Lattice” Pattern
Depends on:• Pattern: - thickness - spacing - overlap• Treatment Fraction.• Effectiveness of treatment.• Wind speed.• Wind direction.
Spr
ead
Rat
e F
ract
ion
Treatment Fraction
Disconnected vs ContinuousStronger Wind
Disconnected vs ContinuousCalm Wind
Summary of Finney Pattern Deficiencies
• Finney geometry cannot be optimized.
-- Affected by wind speed & direction.
-- Affected by treatment type.
• Continuous lines always perform better.
-- Little or no wind effect.
-- Little or no treatment effect.
• Finney geometry is impractical to implement.
Performance of Treatment Patterns
0 0.3 1
Treatment Fraction
Continuous
Discontinuous
Wor
sePe
rform
ance
For equivalent treatment fraction and effectiveness,
All continuous treatments perform better than discontinuous patterns.
Spr
ead
Rat
e F
ract
ion
SPLATs are not Finney
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 0.3 1
SNFPA standard
Slows the fire much less than 23%
Finney example
Slows the fire less than 77%
Finney
SPLATs
0.5
0.1
Rt/R
m
0.77
0.23
Forest Service example of SPLATs
SPLAT Diagram from the SNFPA Final EIS. ( Vol 1, Ch 2, Pg 12 )
A fire burning around the treatments would not take the path shown in the FEIS. It would take the path shown on the right, which is 25% shorter.
Treatments that easily meet SNFPA Standards and Guidelines would readily burn through some of these treatments well before burning around them.
SPLAT Pattern from a Forest Service study on the El Dorado
There are numerous unobstructed fire paths with a south or southwest wind.
Finney PatternConsidered in the El Dorado study.
Impractical, AND there are still many fire paths virtually unobstructed.
Alternative Strategy
• Continuous strips of treatment.
Defensible Fuel Profile Zones
( DFPZs, Finney’s example “b”).
• Always performs better for equivalent amount and type of treatment.
• Not affected by wind speed.
• Less affected by wind direction.
A Direct Comparison:SPLATs vs DFPZs
Add the Same Fire to bothSPLATs and DFPZs
Potential uses for SPLATs
SPLATs vs DFPZswith roads considered