The Fate of the Martial Race[2]

8/3/2019 The Fate of the Martial Race[2]

1/7

The Martial RaceSexual SelectionDarwins follow-up work to On the Origin of Species is Descent of Man, and Selection inRelation to Sex. The notion that sexual selection plays a pivotal role in not only evolution in

general but in human evolution in particular is nearly as old as the theory of evolution itself.Darwins own hypothesis was that the physical differences between the races of man werelargely due to sexual rather than environmental selection, a hypothesis which has fallen out offavor.Within the last couple decades, the introduction of genetic analysis has revived this debate,as the unanticipated disparity between male sex-linked chromosome diversity and femalesex-linked chromosome diversity establishes that the precivilized populations with the highestintelligence and greatest degree of neoteny experienced more acute sexual selection thanenvironmental selection. This finding demands a completely different perspective on humanevolution, adaptation, and migration.

Males of have always been more acutely selected than females, as its possible for a highlysuccessful male to geometrically increase his reproductive output while a female can onlyarithmetically increase her reproductive output. Historically confirmed cases of this phenomenoninclude the Irish king Niall of the Nine Hostages who is likely the paternal ancestor of over 8%of Irishmen, the Mongolian warlord Genghis Khan who is the likely paternal ancestor of .5%of the worlds population, and the Mormon religious leaderBrigham Young who fatheredapproximately 56 children.The nature of sexual selection can vary, but the most typical among mammals is that of maleterritorial aggressionfighting over mates and resources...warfare. The archaeological recordconfirms a pattern where the males in the most fertile habitats were the most acutely engagedin warfare. As abundant resources and temperate climes relaxed the pressure of environmental

selection on the population, selective pressure shifted to male territorial aggression.This is an inversion of the contemporary consensus that the most intelligent humans wereselected in harsh environments which tested their wits. In reality, harsh environments place agreater emphasis on caloric efficiency and physical fitness. The Martial Selection Hypothesispredicts that humans whove been selected for the most challenging habitats will be lessintelligent than humans whove been selected for the most hospitable habitats.The incorrect hypothesis about the origin of intelligence has distorted interpretations of the data,

leading anthropologists to refer to those indigenous to the fertile Chinese Basin as North Asian

and populations indigenous to the temperate forests of Europe and West Asia as Nordic.

The actual tribes indigenous to North Asia and Scandinavia have been largely ignored and the

supposed adaptations to frigid habitats of the most intelligent populations have been largely

imagined.

Following the Martial Selection Hypothesis, physical appearance is largely a secondary result

of the chronic gender disparity in mating patterns. The minority of powerful males capable

of acquiring sizable harems favored the most attractive females when they did so. Universal

correlates of perceived health, fertility, and youthfulness were positively selected, with their
http://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Freeman_OntheOriginofSpecies.htmlhttp://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Freeman_TheDescentofMan.htmlhttp://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Freeman_TheDescentofMan.htmlhttp://www4.nau.edu/isopod/Pubs/Estimating%20Sexual%20Selection%202004.pdfhttp://www.familytreedna.com/public/R1b1c7/default.aspxhttp://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/02/0214_030214_genghis.htmlhttp://content.lib.utah.edu/cdm4/document.php?CISOROOT=/dialogue&CISOPTR=18017&CISOSHOW=17879http://content.lib.utah.edu/cdm4/document.php?CISOROOT=/dialogue&CISOPTR=18017&CISOSHOW=17879http://content.lib.utah.edu/cdm4/document.php?CISOROOT=/dialogue&CISOPTR=18017&CISOSHOW=17879http://content.lib.utah.edu/cdm4/document.php?CISOROOT=/dialogue&CISOPTR=18017&CISOSHOW=17879http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/02/0214_030214_genghis.htmlhttp://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/02/0214_030214_genghis.htmlhttp://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/02/0214_030214_genghis.htmlhttp://www.familytreedna.com/public/R1b1c7/default.aspxhttp://www.familytreedna.com/public/R1b1c7/default.aspxhttp://www.familytreedna.com/public/R1b1c7/default.aspxhttp://www.familytreedna.com/public/R1b1c7/default.aspxhttp://www.familytreedna.com/public/R1b1c7/default.aspxhttp://www.familytreedna.com/public/R1b1c7/default.aspxhttp://www.familytreedna.com/public/R1b1c7/default.aspxhttp://www.familytreedna.com/public/R1b1c7/default.aspxhttp://www.familytreedna.com/public/R1b1c7/default.aspxhttp://www4.nau.edu/isopod/Pubs/Estimating%20Sexual%20Selection%202004.pdfhttp://www4.nau.edu/isopod/Pubs/Estimating%20Sexual%20Selection%202004.pdfhttp://www4.nau.edu/isopod/Pubs/Estimating%20Sexual%20Selection%202004.pdfhttp://www4.nau.edu/isopod/Pubs/Estimating%20Sexual%20Selection%202004.pdfhttp://www4.nau.edu/isopod/Pubs/Estimating%20Sexual%20Selection%202004.pdfhttp://www4.nau.edu/isopod/Pubs/Estimating%20Sexual%20Selection%202004.pdfhttp://www4.nau.edu/isopod/Pubs/Estimating%20Sexual%20Selection%202004.pdfhttp://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Freeman_TheDescentofMan.htmlhttp://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Freeman_TheDescentofMan.htmlhttp://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Freeman_TheDescentofMan.htmlhttp://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Freeman_TheDescentofMan.htmlhttp://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Freeman_TheDescentofMan.htmlhttp://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Freeman_TheDescentofMan.htmlhttp://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Freeman_TheDescentofMan.htmlhttp://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Freeman_TheDescentofMan.htmlhttp://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Freeman_TheDescentofMan.htmlhttp://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Freeman_TheDescentofMan.htmlhttp://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Freeman_TheDescentofMan.htmlhttp://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Freeman_TheDescentofMan.htmlhttp://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Freeman_TheDescentofMan.htmlhttp://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Freeman_TheDescentofMan.htmlhttp://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Freeman_TheDescentofMan.htmlhttp://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Freeman_TheDescentofMan.htmlhttp://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Freeman_TheDescentofMan.htmlhttp://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Freeman_OntheOriginofSpecies.htmlhttp://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Freeman_OntheOriginofSpecies.htmlhttp://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Freeman_OntheOriginofSpecies.htmlhttp://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Freeman_OntheOriginofSpecies.htmlhttp://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Freeman_OntheOriginofSpecies.htmlhttp://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Freeman_OntheOriginofSpecies.htmlhttp://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Freeman_OntheOriginofSpecies.htmlhttp://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Freeman_OntheOriginofSpecies.htmlhttp://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Freeman_OntheOriginofSpecies.html


2/7

offspring being the most likely for biological and sociocultural reasons to become warlords in the

successive generations. Fair and feminine features remain more prevalent among the martial

elite within societies which have only recently civilizeda pattern which remains consistent

even in the absence of significant Caucasian admixture.

Following the Martial Selection Hypothesis, the utility of intelligence in amplifying a populationsability to exploit the environment is a side-effect of sexual selection for intelligence rather than

the primary reason for its selection. Human male intelligence competed was pitted against

human male intelligence in a sexually selective race condition analogous to the pattern

observed in buckswhose antlers grow until the environmental side-effects of the adaptation

limit further growth.

While male intelligence was primarily selected for fitness relative to other intelligent males, a

side-effect of increased male intelligence was an increased capacity to exploit the environment.

This exacerbated the selection for male intelligence by dramatically increasing the population

density of the affected regions and freeing up even more time and energy for martial pursuits.

Unlike tusks and antlers which have environmentally maladaptive side-effects, increased

intelligence has the side-effect of making a specimen more environmentally fit. This asymptotic

process of acute selection for greater intelligence was extremely rapid in evolutionary terms,

terminating in the development of intelligence great enough to establish civilizationa habitat

which no longer selects for either intelligence or fairness.

Human Migration

Following the Martial Selection Hypothesis, the most acute selection for intelligence would occur

in the most fertile habitats. The habitats capable of supporting the largest human populations

are the major river valleys in the temperate belt. As such, it predicts that they would supportlarge populations which would regularly pulsate out, invading nearby regions which are

incrementally less fertile. Genetic, historical, and linguistic data aligns with this model, with the

major migration groups originating in one the major temperate river valleys.

The Danubian Tribes

The Danube River Valley supported a large population which is likely associated with the R1b

haplogroup. This population is ancestral to the majority of contemporary Europeans, especially

Western Europeans. Limited records of their linguistic and cultural heritage remain due to a

hostile migration of Volgic Tribes.

The Volgic Tribes

The Volga River Valley supported a large population which is likely associated with the R1a1

haplogroup. While this populations ancestry is no longer dominant in any population, its

widespread invasions of Europe, Central Asia, South Asia, and even the Chinese Basin left

a permanent cultural, linguistic, and genetic impact. Their Indo-European language family

is nearly exclusive throughout Europe, even in regions where they left only a minor genetic

imprint.


3/7

The Ob Riber Tribes

The Ob Riber Tribes spilled into Europe only after the Volgic Tribes had settled into civilizational

behavioral patterns, migrating into Northeastern Europe. Their Finno-Ugric language family and

N haplogroup are their hallmarks.

The Mesopotamian Tribes

These tribes were the first humans to transition from a semi-nomadic lifestyle to civilization.

Traces of their Sumerian language family continue to exist and artwork testifies to their unique

and long-extinct appearance, but theyve been almost entirely replaced by successive ways

of Nilotic and Volgic invasions in addition to experiencing a dysgenic regression through

miscegenation with the neighboring Arabian Desert and Siberian Tundra (Turkic) tribes.

The Indo-Gangetic Tribes

The Elamo-Dravidian language family and the H haplogroup identify this family of tribes which

may well have overlapped significantly with the Mesopotamian tribes. Their original appearance

was likely similar to that of the Nilotic and Meosopotamian tribes, but has been dramatically

altered by miscegenation with the neighboring negritoid rainforest populations. More recently,

they were invaded by Volgic Tribes which heavily influenced them culturally, linguistically, and

genetically.

The Nilotic Tribes

The Semitic/Afro-Asiatic language family and the J haplogroup identify this family of tribes

which grew to dominate and replace the Mesopotamian Tribes in the Middle East and heavily

settle the Mediterranean coastline through their mastery of seamanship. Their Phoenician and

Hebrew tribes in particular played decisive roles in history. With the exception of Ashkenazi

Jews whove retained their original phenotype in their European settlements, the majority ofcontemporary populations who claim their ancestry also claim significant Arabian and Negroid

ancestry.

The Yellow Tribes

The Yellow River Valley tribes are the progenitors of the Chinese and other East Asian

populations. Having been genetically isolated and bestowed with relatively less Neanderthal

admixture and relatively more Denisovan admixture, they developed increased intelligence and

attractiveness in a manner which is distinct from that developed outside the Chinese Basin.

While Western tribes arrived at feminine features through the exploitation of Neanderthal

adaptations for lighter skin, hair, and eyes, the East Asian tribes accomplished a similar effect

primarily through decreasing testosterone levels.

Conclusion

Whiteness is the product of martial selection, and various forms of Whiteness prevailed

throughout the temperate belt stretching from the Iberian Peninsula through the Indo-Gangetic

Plain. Europeans arent superior to or more White than those ancient populations. Geography


4/7

has merely afforded our ancestors more geographical barriers to the dysgenic introgression of

laborers from non-White refugia and history has placed us last in line to be civilized. We are the

last survivors of a once-dominant Martial Race which is being destroyed by Civilized Selection.

Civilized Selection

Civilization may be artificial in a sense, but its a selective habitat all the same, one with

selective pressures which diverge entirely from those which selected for the Martial Race.

Unlike the precivilized habitat which primarily removed undesireables through death in battle,

Civilized Selection is more assortive in nature, with the majority of males enjoying monogamous

female partners who also belong to the same niche within the overarching habitat.

This sorting into niches happens in phases, with the earlier stages of civilization featuring

more fluid performance-oriented transitions between one niche and another. Gradually, the

niches become both socially separate and sexually endogamous. Offspring are both genetically

selected for their niches and indoctrinated from earlier and earlier ages for excelling within

their niches. In sociological terms, the earlier stage is one in which a society has relatively fluid

classes and the later stage is one in which a society has relatively fixed castes.

While the progression of each civilization is subject to internal and exogenous factors, certain

developmental patterns are universal. Namely, the habitat of civilization contains four primary

niches: martial, managerial, mercantile, and menial. There are essentially four ways to get a

ditch dug: force a man to dig it, persuade a man to dig it, pay a man to dig it, or dig it yourself.

In the earliest stage of civilizaton, warlords directly force menial laborers to develop and

maintain it.Gradually, the increasing complexity and the optimality of persuasion over violence

in manipulating domesticated humans shifts power to the priests and scribes. In the penultimatestage in a civilizations development, power is acquired through resource and wealth acquisition.

In the final stage, these mercantile elites have so aggressively and effectively stripped the

land and people that nothing is left but a seething mass of miscegenated menial monstrosities

wandering a barren wasteland.

The four cardinal castes are selected over time until only the martial caste resembles the

founding population. The managerial and mercantile castes are selected for intelligence relative

to the rest of the population, but its a less creative intelligence coupled to a less impulsive

and more bookish temperament. The fearlessness and impulsive spirit of the warrior gives

way to the anxious and deliberate spirit of the bureaucrat both in the disposition of the leaders

themselves and in the disposition of the civilization in question.

Within a vacuum, the population of the civilization will gradually evolve to fill those niches.

If; however, the civilization is abuts an environmentally selected population, that population

will make for more efficient menial laborers than host populations menial class. In India, the

negrito rainforest pygmies fulfilled this role, being steadily absorbed from the jungle and into the

civilization to perform the menial labor. In Ancient Egypt, laborers from the nearby deserts and


5/7

jungles were steadily absorbed into the civilization to perform the menial labor. In Mesoamerica,

the Asiatic overlords steadily absorbed Australoid populations from the surrounding jungle. In

contemporary America, the elites are steadily absorbing those same populations for its menial

labor.

Until the last of the semi-nomadic martial tribes had invaded and settled, there was a counter-balance to this pattern, wherein a civilization which inculcated these regressive populations

would be invaded by and reinvigorated with the blood of the invasive warrior tribes. The White

Dravidian population of India darkened and declined until it was vulnerable to the Volgic

invaders who brought about an Aryan Renaissance. The White Mesopotamian population

of Persia darkened and declined until it was vulnerable to those same invaders. The White

Mediterranean population of the Roman Empire darkened and declined until it was vulnerable to

the Germanic invaders.

While that process has been exhausted, a new process has emerged wherein the managerial

caste which grew to dominate the Nilotic civilization has decoupled itself from the civilization its

indigenous to and adapted to the role of an invasive managerial and mercantile elite. The Jews,

driven both by their evolved dispositions and by their mythology, exploit their superior talent

relative to the challenges presented by mature civilizations to cuckold the ruling classes. Initially,

they serve as catalysts for one indigenous faction over another, then subvert and control the

successful faction from within.

Freemasonry and the Occult War

In Western Europe, the aristocratic elite and the priesthood operated more or less above ground

in a more or less symbiotic relationship for centuries. However, increasing travel and trade

that began at the time of the Crusades led to a growing number of merchants, craftsmen, andpeasants who were accumulating wealth but had no way to convert it into political power or

ideological-managerial influence. The Throne and Altar, rather than adapting their tactics to

retain power in the face of the rise of the Market, generally chose repression.

This forced the mercantile elites to exercise their power in secrecy. What had previously been

mere trade guilds transformed into vast decentralized secret societies engorged with capital,

eventually culminating in the largest and most effective one: Freemasonry. The invasive Jewish

population, managerial refugees of a bygone civilization, adapted to this new reality, becoming

adept at trade and commerce while retaining their priestly tradition intact.

At this point in history, Europes mercantile elites and the Jews were allied against the

ancien rgime, both of them carrying out their offensives in an occult war waged through a

series of proxy battles with similar themes: liberation, equality, republicanism, free speech,

separation of church and state, and similar Enlightenment ideals. This has resulted in the

European Traditionalist conception of Judaism and Freemasonry as being synonymous or at

least hyphenated: Judeo-Masonic. America, the brainchild of a Masonic mercantile elite, is

perceived as the embodiment of everything anti-European and anti-Traditional.


6/7

But is that paradigm accurate or appropriate? Americas founding fathers and her founding

documents are unmistakably Masonic and mercantile in character. But is a convenient alliance

with Jewry or even substantial influence from Jewry sufficient to dismiss the Masonic oligarchy

as Judeo-Masonic?

As Evola observes in his essay, The Relationship Between Judaism and Freemasonry:

Finally, it must be pointed out that, if the fact of having borrowed elements from the

Jewish tradition was enough for an accusation, then the accusation against Masonry

could easily be extended to Christianity itself; and such is in fact the path followed, quite

consistently, by radical racist anti-Semitism, in connection with which it was rightly said

that anti-Semitism follows the trajectory of a boomerang: leveled originally against Jews

by the Church, anti-Semitism threatens to turn against the latter because of what Semitic

elements it retains.

While Christianitys Jewish influence is obvious and undeniable, Europes aristocratic elites

werent immune from this, either. They were thoroughly Christianized, immersed in Levantine

myths and symbols, and alienated from their pagan roots. Additionally, as they approached

the nadir of their competence, they relied increasingly on Court Jews for financial and

administrative assistance.

Evola hypothesizes that Jewish promotion of anti-traditionalism in the West may actually be a

useful tactic in preserving their own race and their own Tradition:

That the true Jew is as anti-traditional, with respect to the other peoples of the milieu

in which he is, as he is tenaciously attached to what is peculiar to his people and to histradition, is as singular a paradox as it is instructive. The question therefore is whether

the humanitarian and democratic sermons of Judaism are only forms of well-thought-

out hypocrisy, in the sense that the freedom dreamt of by the Jew within the leveled and

fraternalistic world of the Masonic-liberal ideals, and such milieus, would not correspond

to the intention of the Jews to melt and vanish into this subnational pulp, but that this

freedom would be instead the necessary condition for an unchecked action, aiming at

the affirmation of Israel and at the reversal, in favor of this people, of the relations of

subordination which it detested so much in the anti-liberal, traditional world. The fact

is that everywhere the Jews were given a free hand, they managed to rapidly attain

important positions of command in public life while never ceasing to keep in touch

with each other with the tenacious, mutualistic solidarity of a sect. Is it possible as

a mathematician would put it to extrapolate the significance of that fact, and to

interpret on this basis the general action of liberal-democratic Judaism? It is certainly

a serious question. It amounts to asking whether, behind Judaism as an anti-tradition,

more or less linked to any given subversive movement of our epoch, there is a Judaism

as tradition, the two being in the same relation with each other as an army is to its clear-

minded headquarters.


7/7

What the evolutionary traditionalist model suggests is that the mercantile elite developed

organically, for reasons unrelated to Jewry, and would have likely grown in power until it toppled

the obsolete elites, even if there were there no Jews in Europe. (Plato describes the downfall

of aristocracy and the rise of oligarchy in Book VIII of the Republic. It was a process that had

been observed many times in the city states of Greece, where it had nothing to do with Jewishinfluence.) The Jews did what was logical: exploited the old orders failure to adapt to the

Mercantile Age to build their own power base, then allied with and influenced the indigenous

mercantile elite.

Evola concludes his essay on the relationship between Judaism and Freemasonry with the

following synopsis:

From the practical point of view, it is obvious, whatever the case may be, that one

hypothesis leads to the same consequences as the other. Politically and socially,

Masonry and Judaism combine into one and the same campaign, against which it is

good to fight, whether by doing so one fights simply a humanitarian, leveling utopianism,

having its principle and its end in itself, or whether, on the other hand, one may by doing

so paralyze one of the main instruments in the service of the occult will-to-power of

a race which is not ours, and whose triumph, visible or invisible, could only mean the

decline of the highest heritage of the best Indo-European civilization.

It is at this point that both Julius Evola and the defenders of Western Civilization have taken a

wrong turn. This line of reasoning forfeits the pursuit of mercantile power, the regnant power

source of this Age, to a race that is not ours. It guarantees the decline of the highest heritage

of the best Indo-European civilization. The Jews are a priestly caste who dont genuinely buy

the Enlightenment ideals they promote, but they rode the tiger directing their mastery of themercantile arts toward assuring the triumph of their people.

Documents

The Fate of the Martial Race[2]