Upload
fatimah-sakeenah
View
33
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
THE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT PRACTICES OF STATE
MOSQUES IN PENINSULAR MALAYSIA
SITI ALAWIAH SIRAJSHAHUL HAMEED MOHAMED IBRAHIM
MALIAH SULAIMAN
Article reviewed by:Fatimah Sakeenah binti
AnuarG1018512
General Overview
Research:To examine the FM applied in SM
(2001-2002)
Population:12SM
Method:Existence & Strength
Questionnaire Survey & Face-to-face Interviews
Characteristics of GOOD BUSINESS RESEARCH
Cooper, D.R. & Schindler, P.S. (2011)
Purpose clearly defined
Research process detailed
Research design thoroughly
planned
High ethical standards
applied
Limitation frankly
revealed
Adequate analysis for
decision maker’s needs
Findings presented
unambiguously
Conclusions justified
Researcher’s experience reflected
Characteristics of GOOD BUSINESS RESEARCH
Cooper, D.R. & Schindler, P.S. (2011)
1.Purpose clearl
y defin
ed
yes
Research process detailed
Research design thoroughly
planned
High ethical standards
applied
Limitation frankly
revealed
Adequate analysis for
decision maker’s needs
Findings presented
unambiguously
Conclusions justified
Researcher’s experience
reflected
Purpose of Business Research
YES.“..the study examines the existing financial management practices of state mosques in Peninsular Malaysia…”
Problem Involved / Decision to be Made
YES.Scandal and embezzlement in financial resources in Western Church Institution raised concern to other religious organizations.
Scope of study YES.FM (receipt of income, disbursement, reporting, budgeting, other assets custody)
Definition of significant terms
YES. Financial management, Masjid, Church, Accountability
Purpose clearly defined
Characteristics of GOOD BUSINESS RESEARCH
Cooper, D.R. & Schindler, P.S. (2011)
Purpose clearly defined
2.Research proce
ss detail
ed yes
Research design thoroughly
planned
High ethical standards
applied
Limitation frankly
revealed
Adequate analysis for
decision maker’s needs
Findings presented
unambiguously
Conclusions justified
Researcher’s experience
reflected
Clarify Research QuestionManagement Dilemma
Research Question
Research
Proposal
Research Design Strategy
(type, purpose, time frame, scope, environment)
Data Collection & Preparation
Data Analysis & Interpretation
Reporting
Cooper, D.R. & Schindler, P.S. (2011)
Clarify Research Question
Management Dilemma
Research Question
The loss of confidence and the raise of doubt among public regarding the ability of non-profit organization to prevent fraud and embezzlement .
Do state mosque in Malaysia practice proper financial management?
Research process detailed
Research procedure used should be described in sufficient detail to permit others to repeat the research
-steps to acquire participants -informed consent-sampling methods and representatives-data gathering procedures
Study on 12 SM in Peninsular Malaysia2001 – 2002List of the mosque (Table 1)
Data collected using ‘mixed methodology’ approach:Postal questionnaire (quanti.) and structured interview (quali.)
3 stages of data collection:1. Survey via phone2. Mailing out Questionnaire3. Structured interview
Analyze data using DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS
Denotes SM with A to M
Characteristics of GOOD BUSINESS RESEARCH
Cooper, D.R. & Schindler, P.S. (2011)
3.Research
design thoroughly
planned
yes
Research process detailed
Purpose clearly defined
High ethical standards
applied
Limitation frankly
revealed
Adequate analysis for
decision maker’s needs
Findings presented
unambiguously
Conclusions justified
Researcher’s experience
reflected
The choice of procedural design should be described clearly, planned carefully to get more objective results.
Clear data collection procedure
YES. 3 stages of data collection:1. Survey via phone2. Mailing out Questionnaire3. Structured interview
Clear sampling unit YES. 1. SM2. Receive public donation
Clear sampling method NOT STATED. 10/12
Representativeness of samples
YES.100% Population = Samplesp.77
Research design thoroughly planned
Characteristics of GOOD BUSINESS RESEARCH
Cooper, D.R. & Schindler, P.S. (2011)
4.High ethical standa
rds applied
yes
Research process detailed
Purpose clearly defined
Research design
thoroughly planned
Limitation frankly
revealed
Adequate analysis for
decision maker’s needs
Findings presented
unambiguously
Conclusions justified
Researcher’s experience
reflected
Safeguards to protect participants, organizations, clients & researcher
“For the purpose of anonymity, the names of state mosques are not disclosed in this paper.”
Author refer state mosques with alphabet A to M.
Recommendation within the boundary of the study.
YES.
Methodology & limitations reflect researcher’s restraint and concern for accuracy
YES.
High ethical standards applied
Characteristics of GOOD BUSINESS RESEARCH
Cooper, D.R. & Schindler, P.S. (2011)
5.Limitation
frankly revealed
yes
Research process detailed
Purpose clearly defined
High ethical standards
applied
Research design thoroughly
planned
Adequate analysis for
decision maker’s needs
Findings presented
unambiguously
Conclusions justified
Researcher’s experience
reflected
Report imperfection in proceduraldesign
YES. Limitation on methodology, analysis and interpretations and on general study.
Report its effect towards validity and reliability
YES.
Limitation frankly revealed
Characteristics of GOOD BUSINESS RESEARCH
Cooper, D.R. & Schindler, P.S. (2011)
6. Adequa
te analysi
s for decisio
n maker’s needs
yes
Research process detailed
Purpose clearly defined
High ethical standards
applied
Limitation frankly
revealed
Research design thoroughly
planned
Findings presented
unambiguously
Conclusions justified
Researcher’s experience
reflected
Extensive analysis to reveal its significance
YES.
Appropriate methods of analysis-Check validity and reliability-Statistical (good technique, probability of error, significant)
2 methods (existence and strength) V & R not tested but the limitations are clearly describedEg. Suggestion to increase sample size
Good classification of data
YES.
Adequate analysis for decision maker’s needs
Characteristics of GOOD BUSINESS RESEARCH
Cooper, D.R. & Schindler, P.S. (2011)
7. Finding
s present
ed unambiguously
yes
Research process detailed
Purpose clearly defined
High ethical standards
applied
Limitation frankly
revealed
Adequate analysis for
decision maker’s needs
Research design thoroughly
planned
Conclusions justified
Researcher’s experience
reflected
Presentation of data in words, graphs or table must:-comprehensive-reasonably interpreted-easily understood by decision maker-organized
YES.The presentation of findings and discussion are organized.-Methods of analysis (describe and define)-Findings and explanation (specific to general)-Interpretations scope
Findings presented unambiguously
Characteristics of GOOD BUSINESS RESEARCH
Cooper, D.R. & Schindler, P.S. (2011)
8. Conclu
sion justified
yes
Research process detailed
Purpose clearly defined
High ethical standards
applied
Limitation frankly
revealed
Adequate analysis for
decision maker’s needs
Findings presented
unambiguously
Research design thoroughly
planned
Researcher’s experience
reflected
Conclusions are matched with detailed findings.
YES.The conclusion did not over the boundaries of research findings.
Specify condition under which conclusions seems to be valid.
YES.Authors include limitations of research and the scope of research.
Conclusion justified
Characteristics of GOOD BUSINESS RESEARCH
Cooper, D.R. & Schindler, P.S. (2011)
9.Researcher’
s experie
nce reflected
no
Research process detailed
Purpose clearly defined
High ethical standards
applied
Limitation frankly
revealed
Adequate analysis for
decision maker’s needs
Findings presented
unambiguously
Conclusions justified
Research design thoroughly
planned
Provides sufficient information about researcher.-Qualifications-Experience-Good reputation-Ethical
NO.Only general information.Department, Kulliyyah and University
Researcher’s experience reflected
Characteristics of GOOD BUSINESS RESEARCH
1. Purpose Clearly Defined yes
2. Research Process Detailed yes
3. Research Design Thoroughly Planned Yes
4. High Ethical Standards Applied Yes
5. Limitations Frankly Revealed yes
6. Adequate Analysis for Decision Maker’s Needs
yes
7. Findings Presented Unambigiously yes
8. Conclusions Justified yes
9. Researcher’s Experience Reflected No