The Finnish Civil Guards Rifle Model of 1924 - By Vic Thomas

7/27/2019 The Finnish Civil Guards Rifle Model of 1924 - By Vic Thomas

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-finnish-civil-guards-rifle-model-of-1924-by-vic-thomas 1/32

The Finnish Civil Guards rifle-model Of 1924

by Vic Thomas

Many if not most of the Mosin Nagant rifles the Finnish forces captured or inherited at the time of their Independence in 1918 were in poor or worsecondition. By the early 1920‟s the rifles that were in serviceable condition soon required some kind of repair or refurbishment process to remain in service.

At this time frame of the early 1920‟s, the Finnish government had little if any capacity to manufacture replacement barrels for the rifles in service with the

Army or Civil Guard organization. Instead they relied upon contracts with other countries to provide the replacement barrels so badly needed to refurbishtheir worn weapons. The Finnish Civil Guard or “Suojeluskunta” in Finnish, sought bids from selected companies in Germany and Switzerland, to produce the

replacement barrels for their use.The initial contract for production of these barrels was awarded to Switzerland in 1923 and another followed in 1924. An additional German contract was

awarded in 1924 and continued through 1926. The Finnish women‟s auxiliary played a vital part in the ability to purchase these new barrels and refurbish the

rifle to the new standards set forth by the high command of the Civil Guard. This auxiliary organization founded after the Finnish war of Liberation in 1919was known as the “Lotta Savard”. The group would go on to organize and raise funds to allow the purchase and refurbishment of 10,000 m/24 rifles for the

Civil Guard. Thus the m/24 would bear the nickname “Lottakivaari” or “Lotta‟s rifle”

m/24 SWISS CONTRACT

The Civil Guard headquarters contacted the Swiss fi rm of Schweizerische Industrie-Gesellschaft of Neuhausen am Rheinfalls in the spring of 1923 to

investigate the possibility of a production contract with the renown arms firm in regard to the manufacture of new barrels for their Finnish rifles. The contractwas agreed upon and on April 10th 1923, 3,000 Mosin Nagant barrels and 500 Japanese Arisaka rifle barrels were ordered from SIG. One Finnish source

http://www.mosinnagant.net/finland/M24-Rifle.asp






reports that the order was actually for 2500 barrels of the Mosin Nagant style and 500 Arisaka barrels for a total of 3000. These initial Mosin Nagant barrelswere made to the original Russian m/1891 drawings and specifications. This initial order of barrels was delivered by SIG to the Civil Guard workshop in

Helsinki the following year in April of 1924.Upon delivery of the primary order, an additional order of 5,000 Mosin Nagant barrels was placed once again with SIG on April 3rd 1924. In addition a

separate order and contract was negotiated with a German consortium totaling 5,000 additional barrels. The Finnish company of Ase Oy (Weapons, Inc.) ofHelsinki handled the contracts between the foreign suppliers and the Finnish government. These orders called for the delivery of the second batch ofcontracted barrels to be ready by 1925. All subsequent orders for barrels were placed with the German firms from this time on.

m24/ GERMAN CONTRACT

There were four German companies, in name, involved in the manufacture of barrels for the Finnish contracts. Three of these companies were located in

Zella-Mehlis, Germany. The companies were Venus Waffenfabrik, Oscar Will, and Wilhelm Foss. Interestingly these three companies were widely known for

their air rifle production in post World War I Germany. A brief history and description of the relationship was provided in a collector‟s publication about airrifles (71). The Oscar Will Co. subsequently sold out to Wilhelm Foss in 1921 and the company name was eventually changed to Venuswaffenwerk (VenusWeapons Works). Finnish sources identify this company as Venus Waffenfabrik (Venus Weapons Factory) (20).

So while these companies were known by three names during the early 1920‟s, they were in reality only one enterprise by the mid 1920‟s. Two of thesecompanies often appear in Finnish and American publications as one-Venus Waffenfabrik- Oscar Will. The third German company involved in production of

barrels for Finland was Romrwerke AG (AG being the German abbreviation for a public company) of Suhl, Germany. Romerwerke AG was well regarded for itssmall arms production already, specifically at this time for it‟s .22 caliber semi-automatic pistols. The towns of Zella-Mehlis (home of the merged Will/Foss

conglomerate now named Venuswaffenwerk) and Suhl are only about ten miles apart in the district of Thuringia in central Germany, and about 30 miles

southwest of Erfurt- the town famous for production of the Mauser rifle. This area of Germany is world famous for it‟s top quality steel production and for it‟shigh quality weapons production capabilities which would extensively arm the German army in both World Wars.

The first delivery of Mosin Nagant barrels from Germany occurred on May 5th 1924 with the delivery of the initial contract of 5,000 barrels from VenusWaffenfabrik of Zella-Mehlis (20). This order was followed by the second delivery of 8,000 on August 6th of 1925 from the same firm. Romerwerke AG of Suhl

received the order for the remaining 5000 units on November 6th 1926 and was able to deliver the completed contract to Finland the following year on March16th 1927. This fulfilled the total contract of 18,000 barrels from the German makers. The Wilhelm Foss name is only mentioned in discussion of the German

contracts but not in any actual production figures. This name may have been superseded by the time of the actual production of barrels with the VenusWaffenfabrik label. All of the German barrels were again delivered to the Civil Guard workshop in Helsinki were the final assembly work was done.

This small workshop of the Civil Guard was the predecessor of world famous SAKO weapons facility which it would grow to become. On June 1st of 1927the growing company was organized as a public entity and would be known as Suojeluskuntain Ase-ja Konepaja Osakeyhtiö or the Civil Guard Weapons andMachine Shop Co. which would be better known by its intials-SAKO. Later that year the facility would be moved northwest of the city to the town of Riihimäki

where it remains today.

IMPROVEMENTS TO THE m/24 BARREL

After the initial order with SIG had been placed, the Civil Guard continued to run testing with the barrel specifications of the Mosin Nagant in an effort toimprove upon the original m/1891 design. These tests and evaluations concluded that an increase in the width of the barrel wall would improve the accuracyof the rifle. In July of 1925 the Civil Guard armourers and engineers altered the initial drawings and specifications for production to include new dimensionsfor the thicker walled or “heavy” barrel. All barrels produced from this time forward would be of the new barrel design. The new barrel dimensions were

approximately 1 mm thicker than the previous m/1891 specifications. The muzzle end retained the original thickness so that existing cruciform socketbayonets could still be used. This resulted in the characteristic “step” at the muzzle end of the m/91-24‟s barrel.











The early first pattern barrel made to the original specifications of the 1891 rifle is on top. These were made exclusively by SIG and are therarest of the m/24 barrel variations. The bottom barrel in the picture is the most common and is of the improved "stepped" barrel design

and of a heavier walled construction. The step allowed the use of the standard cruciform bayonet that was modified to accommodate thetaller front sight.

Some minor interior changes of the barrel such as the bore diameter and improvements in the depth and size of the lands and grooves were alsoundertaken at this time. Several other modifications were planned as well such as the rear sight scale being altered from Arshins to meters and a new taller

front sight installed to accommodate this change. The rear sight leaf was designed to be raised and allow for aimed fire from 1300 to 3200 arshini but afterthe modifications it was not used in that matter any longer. It was used only in the flat position with the meter markings as modified. The rear sight base waseven altered in the steps of the graduations to properly reflect the change in distance for the sight position. A new step was often added at the start of the

base to allow for a range setting of 150 or 200 meters in many cases. The rear sight leaf was also altered to accept a new “U” notch sight plate attachmentas well as an improved trigger arrangement installed. The trigger was improved by the addition of a small coiled spring arraignment that exerted somepressure upon the trigger and sear. This resulted in a crisp take up of the trigger and reduced the “two stage” or “creep” of the trigger enhancing the

accuracy of the rifle. With the advent of the new barrel diameter the stocks of the older m/1891 specifications had to undergo an alteration as well. The depthof the barrel channel would be deepened and widened slightly to accommodate the heavier barrel. The handguard was also modified slightly to be againslightly deeper and wider to seat properly on the new thicker barrel.



The trigger spring added to the m/24's trigger assembly. It is held in place by the trigger pin that passes through the center of it. As you can see it places a small amount of tension on the triggers top to make the pull under some tension and create a smooth take up. This

feature was continued on into the m/24's successor, the model of 1928 rifle.

These modifications as well as the new barrel design were implemented fully in May of 1926 and the official designation of the rifle was then changed from

the m/1891 to the m/91-24. These new ri fles were then issued to Civil Guard units across Finland in specific military “districts”. These districts could belikened to the American county divisions within a state for example. The district number that each rifle was assigned to was then stamped on the rifles barrelas well as the Civil Guard‟s property mark of a large “S” preceding it. An example of this marking would be S 5100 which would have been a rifle issued to a

Civil Guard unit located in the district of Helsinki. All rifles in subsequent production were refurbished to the new specifications.



The "S" number placed on the barrel by the Suoljeuskunta headquaters to identify which district the rifle would be assigned to. This particular rirfle was issed to Civil Guard units located in the Helsinki district. The rifles "S" number is 714 and the Helsinkidistrict was

assigned rifle number 1 to 6000.

PRODUCTION QUANTITIES BY MANUFACTURE AND TYPE

Marrku Palokangas, curator of the Small Arms museum in Helsinki Finland and renowned author and expert on Finnish weapons, reports that the first13,000 barrels (3,000 and 5,000 from SIG and 5,000 from Germany) were produced to the original design and the final 13,000 (5 ,000 and 8,000) to the new

thicker walled barrel design of the m/24 specifications. These numbers however do not “jive” with observed specimens. An example of this is that all knownand reported German produced barrels are of the “stepped” updated configuration. Also for his reported numbers to be correct all SIG produced barrels wouldhave been in the original configuration and non-stepped. Most reported and documented barrels from the database reflect barrels from SIG that are of the

thicker “stepped” variety. The more probable scenario is that the first order for 3,000 barrels from SIG were produced to the original specifications for a m/91barrel while the second order from SIG and the German consortium would have been in the updated design .This would result in totals of 3,000 unsteppedbarrels and 23,000 stepped making the unstepped m/24 a very scarce and collectable rifle.

m/24 makers and

production totals

Unstepped Stepped

"SIG"

Schweizerische

3000

The first contract run made

5000

Second contract with



Industrie-Gesellschaf to original specs heavier barrel

Bohler-Stahl

(All heavier stepped

barrels)

5000

First contract with Germanbarrel makers

8000

Second contract withGerman barrel makers

MODEL DESIGNATION

The model 24 or m/91-24 designation often results in some confusion when the various models of Finnish long rifles are discussed. This confusion resultsfrom the fact that both stepped and un-stepped Civil Guard long ri fles are designated m/24‟s, while the Army also had some stepped barreled long rifles

produced by Tikkakoski which retained the m/91 designation. All known m/24‟s are stamped with the Civil Guard emblem of three fir sprigs over a large “S”contained within a shield while the Army issued rifles will have a “T”„ in an inverted triangle emblem denoting manufacture by the Tikkakoski arsenal. The

following unofficial designations are often used by collectors to differentiate these very similar rifles:

The marking of the Civil Guard property found only on the barrel of the m24 rifle

Standard barrel m/24Civil Guard logo on the barrel and no step in the barrel contour. The barrel is made to the original m/91 specifications. This rifle

is relatively uncommon.

"Heavy" barrel m/24

Civil guard logo on the barrel and manufactured by either SIG or the German arms consortium of Böhler Stahl. The barrel is ofthe updated thicker specifications and a “step” can be found in the contour of the barrel end.

m/91 standard

Any Russian or Finnish Army produced m/91 without a thicker stepped barrel-1937-1943.

m/91 “Heavy” barrel

Approximately 3,000 rifles of this type were produced by Tikkakoski in 1926-7 for the Finnish army. They will bear theTikka logo of a “T” in a triangle on the barrel and have a heavier stepped barrel like that of the later m/24 rifles.



MARKINGS

The markings found on both the Swiss and German produced barrels for the m/24 are fairly consistent and simple. The marking used to denote the

ownership of the Civil Guard or Suojeluskunta in Finnish was the capital “S” below three fir sprigs and enclosed in a shield emblem. The barrels are also

marked with their respective makers, either Swiss or German. The German produced barrels identifying marks will be found under the barrel just in front ofthe rear sight base and are marked “Böhler-Stahl”. The German word “Stahl” refers to steel and “Böhler” is a specific type of high quality steel developed foruse in rifle barrels by the Germans. This marking can only be seen with the barrel removed from the stock. To date there is no method to differentiate thebarrels of one German maker with that of another.

The marking identifying marking found on the bottom of the Germanproduced barrels. It can only be seen by removing the action from the stock. If the SIG marking is not evident just above the woodline, then almost assuredly the rifles barrel was produced by Bohler Stahl.

The Swiss made barrels are marked “Schweize Industrie-Gesellschaft Neuhausen”. This marking in a stylized script can be observed just above the wood

line on the right (bolt handle side) of the barrel. It is possible that may be partially below the wood line as a few rifles have been noted as such. On another

note SIG made barrels for the m/28 civil Guard rifle have logo of the Swiss firm completely under the wood line.



The logo of the SIG company found the right barrel side denoting Swiss produced barrels.

Most m/24‟s will be stamped with the [SA] property stamp. This marking was not added until at least 1942 when the Civil Guards weapons inventory wasintegrated with that of the Army during the Finnish Continuation War (W.W.II), the [SA] denoting ownership by the Finnish army. Most guns (nearly all) will

also bear the “S” number as previously discussed in the text. This “S” number is not limited to placement on the barrel as it can also be found on thereceiver, buttstock flat or bolts of the weapon. Many times this “S” number is lined out and another stamped alongside or in a different location on the barrel,receiver or stock. This new “S” number represents a transfer to a new issue district for the rifle and is so marked with that districts identifying numbersequence. If the “S” number is lined out completely, the rifle was more than likely taken into possession of by the Army after the integration of the Civil

Guard in 1942.A few m/24‟s of both Swiss and German barrel manufacture have a large “arrow” stamped on the top of the barrel either below or above the Civil Guard

shield. This mark is composed of an equilateral triangle with a single straight line coming off the center of the triangle- giving the appearance of an arrow or

“Christmas tree”. This marking denotes that the barrel was shortened slightly from the threads and rechambered to correct the throat of the chamber by thearsenal. The SAKO factories<36s00> pressure mark is almost always found on rifles so marked as above to indicate that a pressure test was done after thebarrel work was preformed.



The unique marking placed on rifles that have had the barrelthreads shortened and then "chased' to freshen them for a proper seating. This

resulted in a shorter over all length which required the chamber to be reset.

Another interesting marking found on m/24‟s is located in the serial numbering. Many barrels have a serial number preceded by a small “o”. Known serialnumbers with this prefix are to approximately 18,000 to 32,000. Interestingly enough, this small “o” prefixed serial number was later used on all m/28‟s with

the SIG produced barrels. There is a serial number range that does not have this prefix as well. These guns range from a low serial number of 1 to as highas 18,000. This range is very non technical as the example pool is too low to draw any firm conclusions. The odd thing is these serial numbers have nothingto do with the barrel production serial number or a Civil Guard district on the m/24's. It is odd that some of the numbers are in the 30,000 range but onlyapproximately 28,000 rifle were made I theorize that this separate "o" number may indicate some type of weapons inventory number. I have made some

inquiry's and when I can furnish a more definitive answer than I will publish it here immediately. Until then the "o" number remains a mystery. One Böhler-

Stahl barreled m/24 and several SIG barreled guns have extremely high serial numbers in the six digit range for example 433045. Others have no serialnumber at all but for the Civil Guard “S” number. One example in the authors collection is sterile but for the serial number on the top of the barrel. This rifleis rumored to be one of the rifles contracted or purchased for shipment to Estonia. It bears a large “E” marking on the bottom portion of the barrel.

The last marking found on the m/24‟s are the sporadic use of a small four pointed star or “petal”. This marking is an early C ivil Guard acceptance prooffound just along the wood line on the right side of the barrel and often encountered in pairs. This marking was later changed to the familiar =s= marking

denoting the same acceptance to service by the Civil Guard headquarters. There are undoubtedly many other small markings found on the m/24‟s such asassembly numbers or minut inspectors stamps which can not be fully explained but are always under review for their meanings.



Early final acceptence proof of the Civil Guard found on m/24 rifles

NON STANDARD m/24 CARBINE

There is a carbine version of the model 24 rifle that is not well known and is not listed in Finnish records as an officially accepted version. This carbineappears to be the civil guards answer to the army's adoption of the m/27 rv carbine in 1935. Some reports out of Finland while doing research for the articleand in personal notes over the years indicate that approximately 600 rifles were taken into the Civil Guards workshops and shortened to provide a short

carbine length weapon for troops who would require it such as communication or mounted troops and crew served weapons. These m/24 carbines areextremely scarce, more so than the rare army version m/27rv. The rifle is a standard production m/24 that has been shortened to the same approximatelength of the m/27rv carbine. The barrel has been recrowned and turned to the same diameter as a m/28 rifle. The front sight was then replaced with a m/28

front sight assembly and blade and soldered in place. A new short rear handguard was fabricated from the standard m/24 handguard to complete the rifle.With so few made and even fewer making it to the US, these rare carbines are without a doubt the crown jewel in any Finnish rifle collection. Just a handfulare reported and almost all of these coming in the importation of the Finnish rifles into the US in the late 1950's and even more so in the large importation of

the 1980's and 90's. The author is aware of only 2 other rifles in private collections in the US and all three including the authors carbine were obtained asm/27's from Century International Arms in the late 1980's.

The ultra rare m/24 carbine



A close up of the forend of the carbine

The front sight and forend in close up of the m/24 carbine



In consulting with another owner of a m/24 carbine we both discovered from the rifles in our collections that the guns were not marked inthe usual spot for acceptance of the stock modifications by the civil guards headquarters. The SYT marking which is normally found in the

right finger groove channel of the m/28 rifles is absent and is instead marked on the right side buttstock flat. There is a "S" number presentunder the SYT marking. Also the SYT is not in a oval shape as on the m/28 rifle but instead is a circle enclosing the SYT brand. Why this is sois unclear at the time but it is perhaps the marking used by this workshop in modifying the m/24 stocks to carbine length and then beingaccepted by the Civil Guard headquarters.

ACCESSORIES

The m/24 was issued with an early one piece leather sling that incorporated an oval steel buckle. Often times this steel buckle was treated or plated andassumes a bronze like hue. The oval buckle on these m/24 slings generally tend to be sewn on the strap rather than riveted like the later versions used on



the m/28. The sling is marked SY and dated either 1924, 1925 or 1926. The rifle was issued a cleaning kit in a cotton or canvas drawstring bag. The bagcould be marked “SY” but more often than not, it is of a “homemade” construction and of no particular color or pattern. Blue and white checked, brown and

tan as well as green and khaki checked pattern examples are some colors observed and all are unmarked. These bags were often constructed by the women‟sauxiliary and volunteer organizations for the troops on a regular basis. This kit contained a screwdriver/combination tool often of a Russian manufactured

blade but a rounded Finnish produced wooden handle. A brass cleaning rod extension and brass jag tip in addition to a rod collar and rod handle for creatingthe “T” handle when in use with the rod collar and cleaning rod where contained within this kit. This rod handle was also used to remove and to securelytighten the cleaning rod when placed into the stock. A bore brush of brass or steel construction was issued as was a small green painted rectangular oilerembossed with the Civil Guard property designation of “SY”. The kit is nearly identical to that of a standard m/91‟s kit but for the oiler and some markings on

the individual componenets of SY or the later Sk.Y.

The muzzle cover/cleaning rod guide came in two versions. The later was commonly made of an alloy or “pot” metal material. Its composition is such thatthey are easily cracked or broken when dropped on a hard surface. This sight cover/muzzle cap covered the front sight blade and was retained by a locking

bar activated by a spring button on the right side. This locking bar or catch snapped onto the rear of the front sight base to secure the unit firmly to the riflesmuzzle. The m/24 muzzle covers cap was knurled with slots and was unscrewed to expose the rod hole for use with the cleaning rod. They are extremely raredue to the poor metal composition of some and few remained after hard use. The early caps were constructed from aluminum and were of a much betterconstruction and finish. The later m/28 cover was patterned after this one and was again made of the improved aluminum alloy.

The bayonet for the rifle was a standard model 1891 socket type of Russian construction with a locking ring to engage the front sight base. The lockingring however was enlarged by the addition of a 1.5mm cut out to accommodate the taller Finnish front sight used on the m/24. I have observed some

bayonets that appear to have had the internal diameter of the socket enlarged ever so slightly to ease the fit of the bayonet to the barrel. A tubular scabbardof steel or aluminum construction was issued with the modified cruciform bayonet. This scabbard was often of German or Austrian construction from WW1inventory and was painted a shade of dark olive green as was favored by the Civil Guard. These were purchased by the Souljeluskunta after WW1 up throughthe 1920‟s. The market for nations shopping to bolster their inventories of war material with these types of items in the 1920 and early 30‟s, was brisk withwar surplus, and the Finnish Army and Civil Guard were actively shopping to supplement their equipment and weapons shortages in this buyers market. A

green leather scabbard of the traditional Finnish design for the 1891 crucifom shaped spikes can also be encountered. A cross strap on the frog/scabbardsecured the spike firmly in the scabbard by passing around the bend of the bayonet or thru the locking ring when seated. The metal scabbards simply used

friction to retain the bayonet in the housing.

Two m/24 bayonets in thier green painted metal scabbards. Note the simple cloth hangar on the top example that would allow the scabbardto be affixed to the belt.

AVAILABILITY AND CONDITION OF m/24 RIFLES



The m/24 is a relatively scarce rifle owing to the small number produced (~27,000) and the attrition rate that the rifle suffered through two majorconflicts, three if one considers the short lived “Lappland War” of 1945 with Germany at the close of Finnish participation in W.W.II. It is quite difficult for the

collector today to locate all of the various models of the m/24, especially the standard barreled version of very early production. Many of the obscuremarkings like the shortened chamber marking of the “christmas tree” shape as it is referred to in the US collecting circles and the NSD (Nylands or Swedish

speaking regiment) and KLP markings (KymeenLaakson Piiri (Kymeenlaakso CG District ) are often very difficult to locate. These two markings are the onlyrealy deviation from the normal “S” shiled markings. The first has been known to be the Nylands district issue outside of Helsinki for some time. The KLPmarking has not been positively identified until recently when a Finnish friend, Mala, who is deeply involved in the study of the Civil Guard and its weaponsprocurement, has uncovered important documents that shed light on this marking finally, in the archives of the Civil Guard organization. This research

indicates that that this particular district, the Kymeenlaakso district- which was later split into a north and south region, was quoting Mala‟s reply “ this

district's armoury was the most active of all local sites and did all kinds of major armament contract jobs for the SkY. So in my opinion, it is 99.9% certaintythat KLP means that a m/91-24 marked as such has been assembled in Kymeenlaakso's District Armoury. Further analysis of this theory seems to confirm

that information as nearly all bear the district “S” number of the Kymeenlaakso Civil Guards district.Some rifles are reported with brass unit discs but the additions of those are almost certainly from integration with the Army and not normally a Civil

Guard procedure. In conclusion, the condition of the rifles is often well worn due to the amount of use the guns have endured and an excellent specimen istruly a rare find for the collector. The importer of the rifles into the US, Century International Arms, incorrectly labeled the rifles as Swiss produced and

advertised them as such in early sales catalogs. This was due in part to the Schweiz Industrie-Gesellschaft Neuhausen marking found on the barrel side andthe sprigged “S” in a shield. They errounesly assumed that all rifles (including the German produced barrels from Böhler-Stahl) marked as such were Swiss

produced. The m/24 rifles are now highly sought after by Finnish small arms collectors-both here and abroad. I hope this section shined some light on therifles storied history and cleared up the myths often associated with its lineage.

The Finnish Model Of 1924

by Vic Thomas



Top and side view of the first series production style rifle produced with the straight barrels of the 1891 pattern by the Schweiz Industrie Gesellschaft

Neuhausen (SIG) company of Switzerland. The first 3000 barrels produced for the Finnish contract were of this design mimicking the original Russianspecifications. The stock is a Russian one piece design that would require no modifications to accept the new barreled receiver. The later version with theheavier stepped design would stock modifications.

The markings of the two barrel producers who were contracted the produce the barrels for the Civil Guards m/24 rifle. On the left is the Swiss producedbarrel of the SIG company. On the right is the barrel marking of the larger German consortiums contract found on the bottom of the barrel.



The marking designed by the Civil Guard headquarters to denote the ownership of the model 1924 rifle by the Souljeluskunta organization. The marking is aletter "S" with three fir sprigs above it enclosed within a shield. The rifle on the right has an unusual marking in that it is dated 1924 which was not the normfor the m/24 rifles, as they lacked barrel dates marked on the top as

this rifle is. The serial number, N. 15 of the barrel is below the date.

The early markings of the Civil Guard headquarters signifying that the rifle was accepted for service within the organization. For lack of a better description,the marking appears to be of a stylized star or flower petal shape.

http://www.mosinnagant.net/finland/MosinNagantM24PhotoPage.asp






The rifle on the left bears the marking "KLP" which signifies that the gun was assigned to the the Kymeenlaakso district and most probably the armoury. Thisdistrict's armory was the most active of all the local Civil Guard sites and was responsible for all kinds of major armament contract jobs for theSouljeluskunta. The marking on this rifle almost certainly denotes that work was preformed on this barrel in shortening the threads and refreshing them, thusmaking the recutting of the chamber a necessity. The rifle on the right with the "christmas tree" also signifies the same procedure but it is presumed to havebeen performed at the primary Civil Guard workshop. It is thought this is the reason that the "christmas tree" marked guns often lack the high pressure proof

of the SAKO facility as found on the KLP gun. You can clearly see the marking of 3600 with the SAKO "S" in a gear wheel separating the 36 and 00. This alsoadds some credence to the though that the Kymeenlaakso district preformed the work and it was approved by the SAKO facility as meeting pressurespecifications.







The left side photo shows the 3600 pressure proof again on the shortened chamber rifle as well as two separate "S" numbers indicating that the gun has been

transferred from one district to another. The primary or original district is almost certainly the marking placed on the barrel indicating issue to Nylands Södradistrict. This district also used the letters NSD on the barrel shanks in exactly the same manner the Kymeenlaakso district marked their guns with the KLPmarking. These two districts are the only Civil Guard districts that marked their guns with specific identifying markings as in "NSD" and "KLP". The rifle on

the left bears the S 85387 marking in an atypical placement indicating that the gun was transferred after its initial issue to the Pohjois-Karjalan districtlocated on the Isthmus. The rifle on the right exemplifies a standard issue marking of the m/24. This guns single "S" number of 714 indicates issue to onedistrict-Helsinki. It does bear a boxed [SA] marking which tells us this gun went on to later serve in the Finnish army, more than likely it was marked with the[SA] marking in 1942 when the army assumed control of the Civil Guards weapons inventory.



Two shots of the handguard of the m/24 rifle. It was slightly wider and deeper than its 1891 counterpart to accommodate the larger barrel diameter of the

m/24's barrel. On the left is the m/24's handguard and the right is the standard 1891 handguard. The right side photo is an over view of the same twohandguard's showing with some more clarity the thickness of the sides and depth of the groove allowing the handguard to seat properly on the barrel and not"bow" or "gap" as a 1891 handguard does when it is seated on a m/24 barrel.

The stock of a m/24 with the action removed. It is very evident in this picture the areas that were modified by widening and deeping the barrel channelslightly. The light colored sections of this stock are where the 1891 stock was modified to allow the wider and deeper model 1924 "heavy" barrel to seat fullyin the stock and allow the proper placement of the bands and handguard.



The two versions of the barrels produced for the Civil Guard and the m/24 rifle. The top barrel is the first contract of 3000 in the 1891 original configuration.The bottom barrel is the second pattern made to the improved heavier specifications resulting in a barrel with a 1 mm step all the way around and providing

improved accuracy over the original thinner pattern barrel. Note the top rifle also bears the earlier straight high blade of the first Finnish made rifles and thebottom the improved "notched" version that permitted improved light transmission/reflection on the blade creating a sharper silhouette.



The two versions of the rear sight used on the m/24 rifle. The original unaltered sight on the left and the improved sight on the right fit with the "U" shapedsight notch that was affixed by milling of a section of the rear sight and the plate attached by the two screws as the picture shows. This sight provided animproved sight picture of the new notched front sight blade. It is found sporadically on m/24 rifles showing no particular time frame of conversion.

The trigger spring found on the m/24. It was retained by the trigger pin passing through the center of the coils and then engaging the trigger housings in thereceiver. The spring placed some subtle pressure on the trigger that removed the "creep" from the trigger and enhanced the shooters accuracy by allowing a

crisp let off instead of the usual two stage effect so prevalent on the unmodified versions. This enhanced trigger with the spring was later carried over withthe successor of the m/24-the m/28 ri fle.



Three different rear sights for the m/24 rifle. On the left is the unmodified sight of the 1891 rifle as found on some m/24's. In this case a Austro-Hungarianmodified sight showing range settings out to 1200 meters. In this particular case a SIG straight barreled rifle. In the center is a rear sight modified to allow a

lowest setting of 150 meters. On the far right is another rear sight done in a much neater manner allowing a 150 meter range setting. The center and rightpictures show Finnish modified rear sights marked with the range graduations of 300 meters, 400 meters, 550 meters, 700 meters, 850 meters.

The rear barrel band arraignment of the m/24. The primary focus of this picture is to illustrate the small "blocking" screw used on the m/24 and later rifles.This "blocking" screw allowed the bands to be loosened so as to not put any pressure on the barrel and thus distorting the harmonics and placing a pressure

point on the barrel damaging the accuracy of the rifle. This small round head wood screw simply blocked the bands from moving forward when the gun was



fired and thus maintaining the proper position in order to retain the handguard. Both the front and rear bands were done in this manner on the m/24 rifle andthe 1891's of the army that followed.

The Finnish Model Of 1924

Vic Thomas Mosin-Nagant Dot Net

Model 1924 Civil Guards rifle made by Böhler Stahl. Its modified 1891 pattern bayonet and metal scabbard is below.

http://www.mosinnagant.net/finland/FinnishModelM24MosinNagantPhotoPageTwo.asp






Two model 1924 bayonets of the 1891 pattern in their metal scabbards. These scabbards are of German manufacture from the First World War and were

purchased by the Souljeluskunta to supplement their stock. The bayonet scabbard was then painted in the green color of the Civil Guards equipment. The topscabbard still has its simple cloth belt loop attached to the scabbards "frog" button.

Model 24 bayonet removed from its aluminium construction scabbard



A close up view detailing the modifications made to the standard model 1891 bayonet to the modified 1924 pattern. On the left you can see the standard1891 Cruciform bayonet and its locking ring viewed from the rear. On the right is the modified bayonet for the Finnish m/24 rifle. Note the relief cut made atthe top of the bayonet to allow the locking ring to slip over the taller Finnish front sight blade.







Here in this detail shot you can clearly see the relief cut in the locking ring that allows the bayonet to be mounted on the stepped barrel of this Böhler Stahlm/24 rifle. With this bayonet seated partially on the barrel you can clearly see that without the Finnish modification to the locking ring, a standard 1891cruciform bayonet could not be used or mounted on the Civil Guard's m/24 rifles. This is true for both the straight and step barreled varieties.



The special muzzle cover that was produced for the model 1924 Civil Guards rifle. Constructed of aluminum, it was designed to slip onto the barrel and coverthe front sight blade, thus protecting it from damage. The cover was retained by a locking catch that retained the rear of the front sight base when fullyseated. The cap was then unscrewed for the cover to be used as a cleaning rod guide to prevent damage to the muzzle's crown. Later caps were produced

from a "pot metal" type material and were not as durable or as sturdy. They are easily cracked or broken if a sharp blow its them or if they are dropped.These darker gray covers are not that common and it is assumed that they were not produced in large numbers or they simply were destroyed in theirservice life as they are not commonly encountered today.



A close up of the early aluminum construction cover which was of high quality. On this cap you can clearly see the =S= acceptance/property marking as wellas the early Souljeluskunta headquarters acceptance marking below it. Most muzzle cover/guides have the single =S= marking stamped upon them either onthe cap or on the side of the unit.



A montage of the muzzle cover. On the top is the side view showing the cap installed and the push button release for the locking bar that retained the coveron the rifle by locking onto the front sight base. On the right is the rear view showing the area that covered the rear sight and the barrel extension relief. Thelocking bar's catch and push button can be seen clearly in this view. On the bottom left is a front view depicting the cover removed for cleaning the rifle. Youcan clearly see the rod sized hole in the end that allowed the rifles cleaning rod to pass through into the center of the bore and not abrade the muzzles crownor bore causing a loss of accuracy.



Here is a picture showing the m/24 muzzle cover/ guide in use with the rifles cleaning rod and the issued cleaning field kit. The pouch is of "home production"as was typical with the Civil Guard. The cleaning rod has been inserted through the rod collar and the rod collar handle inserted through the rod collar and theretaining hole in the cleaning rod, thus locking all three together as one unit. This made for a convenient "T" handle on the cleaning rod. The pouch contained

essentially a 1891 model cleaning kit with some Finnish additions. The oil bottle was of a small rectangular size and constructed of steel with a brass cap withan oil dripper attached. The seams were lead soldered. The kit also contained two brass rod extensions. One was a fashioned in a spiral "jag" pattern toretain the flannel cleaning strips for cleaning and oiling the bore. The other was a simple rod extension to allow the proper length to be achieved for reaching

the end of the barrel of the chamber. It was threaded to allow the jag to be attached or the horse hair cleaning brush. Adding both created a rod long enoughto clean the rifles bore properly. It is very uncommon to find the rod extensions properly marked as property of the Civil Guard. This marking is a smal SY orSk.Y stamped into the brass rod and jag. The author has only encountered a few of these rare sets in my collecting carrer. The combination tool with a

rounded handle was again a reissue version of the 1891 patern. These have been observed occasionaly with a "SY" or "Sk.Y" brand or stamp on the flat ofthe handle. It was used for firing pin protrusion adjustment and removal as wel as for assembly and disassembly of the rifle. Its blade was reversible to allow



for either a small or large tipped flat screw driver blade depending on the application needed. The last component of the kit was some simple cloth or flannelstrips used to clean the bore and to apply a thin coat of oil afterwards to prevent corrosion. The muzzle cover and all tools were stored in the pouch when notin use. The pouch was either carried in the large pockets of the tunic or the rucksack.

Some typical ammunition pouches used by the civil Guard and in this case more than likely with the m/24 ri fle. Both pouches are German in manufacture and

made during the First World War. They are in spectacular shape for their age and service life. The bandoleer on the bottom is again a typical Civil Guard issueand home front manufacture. It allowed the Civil Guardsman to carry 90 rounds of ammunition as opposed to the leather cartridge boxes capacity of 30 each.It is almost certain that the bandoleer is of Continuation War vintage but its issue with the m/24's in inventory with the Civil Guard at the onset of the Finnish

Continuation War (1941-1944) which would have been very probable.



Here we can see the typical m/24 issue pouches again. The top two show the property markings of the Civil Guard inside on the interior of the cartridgeboxes flap. On the upper left the pouch was placed into service with the SY in 1923. On the upper left the pouch entered into the inventory of the Civil Guardin 1921. The bottom center pouch bears the same type ink stamp marking as the upper right but this time placed on the rear of the pouch. Its former ownerhas signed his name on the pouch for identification reasons apparently.

Documents

The Finnish Civil Guards Rifle Model of 1924 - By Vic Thomas