Upload
others
View
7
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
2012 SIEC-ISBE 84th Conference
Denver, Colorado
July 29th - August 3rd, 2012
The Finnish Success Story of PISA
- What are the reasons for better PISA results in
Finland: Historical, educational and sociological
remarks on teaching, learning and teacher education -
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA Helsinki Business College, Finland
1
Finland
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 2
Introduction
• The Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) is a worldwide evaluation in OECD member countries (currently 34 member nations) and in non-member countries (31 nations and territories in 2009) for 15-year-old students’ scholastic performance, implemented first in 2000 and repeated every three years.
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 3
• It is coordinated by the
Organization for
Economic Co-operation
and Development
(OECD), with a view to
improving educational
policies and outcomes.
(http://www.oecd.-ilibrary.org, 2012)
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 4
…Introduction
…Introduction
• Developed from 1997, the first PISA
assessment was carried out in 2000.
• The results of each period of assessment take
about one year and a half to be analyzed.
• First results were published in November
2001.
• The students participating in the assessment
are chosen by random sampling.
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 5
…Introduction
• Every period of assessment focusses on one of
the three competence fields: reading,
mathematics, science; but the two others are
tested as well.
• After nine years, a full cycle is completed:
after 2000, reading was again the main domain
in 2009.
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 6
…Introduction
• PISA aims at testing literacy in three
competence fields: reading, mathematics, and
science.
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 7
…Introduction
• The PISA mathematics literacy test asks students to apply their mathematical knowledge to solve problems set in various real world contexts.
• To solve the problems, students must activate a number of mathematical competencies as well as a broad range of mathematical contents of knowledge.
• PISA claims to measure education's application to real-life problems and lifelong learning (workforce knowledge).
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 8
…Introduction
• In the reading test, "OECD/PISA does not
measure the extent to which 15-year-old
students are fluent readers or how competent
they are at word recognition tasks or spelling".
• Instead, they should be able to construct,
extend and reflect on the meaning of what they
have read across a wide range of continuous
and non-continuous texts.
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 9
Sampling
• The test design, implementation and data analysis are delegated to an international consortium of research and educational institutions led by the Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER).
• The students tested by PISA are between 15 years and 3 months old and 16 years and 2 months at the beginning of the assessment period.
• The school year/grade of students is not taken into consideration, however, only students at school are tested, and not homeschoolers.
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 10
…Sampling
• To fulfill OECD requirements, each country
must draw a sample of at least 5,000 students.
In small countries like Iceland and
Luxembourg, where there are less than 5,000
students per year, an entire age cohort is tested.
• Some countries used much larger samples than
required to allow comparisons between
regions.
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 11
Results
• All PISA results are broken down by countries.
• Public attention concentrates on just one outcome: achievement mean values by countries.
• In the official reports, country rankings are communicated in a more elaborate form: not as lists, but as cross tables, indicating for each pair of countries whether or not mean score differences are statistically significant.
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 12
…Results
• In some popular media, test results from all
three literacy domains have been consolidated
in an overall country ranking.
• Such meta-analysis is not endorsed by the
OECD.
• The official reports only contain domain-
specific country scores.
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 13
…Results
• An evaluation of the 2003 results showed that
countries which spent more on education did
not necessarily do better.
• Australia, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic,
Finland, Japan, South Korea, New Zealand and
the Netherlands spent less but did relatively
well, whereas the United States spent much
more but was below the OECD average.
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 14
Historical tables
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 15
… Historical tables
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 16
…Results
• The Czech Republic, in the top ten, spent only one third as much per student as the United States did, for example, but the USA came 24th out of 29 countries compared.
• Another point made in the evaluation was that students with higher-earning parents are better educated and tend to achieve higher results.
• This was true in all the countries tested, although more obvious in certain countries, such as Germany.
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 17
Research on causes of
country differences
• Systematic analyses across different paradigms (culture, genes, wealth, educational policies) for 78 countries were presented by Heiner Rindermann and Stephen Ceci (2009, pp. 551-568).
• They report positive correlation between student ability and educational levels of adults, amount and rate of preschool education, discipline, quantity of institutionalized education, attendance at additional schools, early tracking and the use of central exams and tests.
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 18
…Research on causes of
country differences
• Rather negative correlation was found with
high repetition rates, late school enrollment
and large class sizes.
• In their opinion the results suggest that
international differences in cognitive
competence could be narrowed by reforms in
educational policy.
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 19
…Research on causes of
country differences
• PISA, TIMSS and PIRLS, their organizers and
researchers, are restrained in giving reasons for
the large and stable country differences.
• Cautiously, they leave this task to other
researchers, especially from the economic
sciences and psychology.
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 20
…Research on causes of
country differences
• Economic researchers studied single educational policy factors like central exams (John Bishop, 1997), private schools or streaming between schools at later age (Hanushek/Woessman, 2006).
• An extensive literature related to cross-countries difference in scores has developed since 2000.
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 21
The reasons for better PISA results
in Finland (ref.: Ministry of Education, 2012)
Historical and sociological remarks on teaching, learning and teacher education
a) Equal opportunities • The Finnish education system offers everybody
equal opportunities for education, irrespective of domicile, gender, economic situation or linguistic and cultural background.
• The school network is regionally extensive, and there are no sex-specific school services.
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 22
…The reasons for better PISA results
in Finland
...a) Equal opportunities
• Basic education is completely free of charge
(including instruction, school materials, school
meals, health care, dental care, commuting,
special needs education and remedial
teaching).
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 23
…The reasons for better PISA results
in Finland
b) Comprehensive Education
• Basic education encompasses nine years and
caters for all those between 7 and 16 years.
• Schools do not select their students but every
student can go to the school of his or her own
school district.
• Students are neither channeled to different
schools nor streamed.
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 24
…The reasons for better PISA results
in Finland
c) The respected status of teachers (attracting
good students to one teaching profession)
• As the teaching profession is very popular in
Finland, universities can select the most
motivated and talented applicants.
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 26
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 27
Open learning environment
…The reasons for better PISA results
in Finland
d) Competent teachers
• In all school levels, teachers are highly
qualified and committed.
• They require a Master’s degree, and teacher
education (includes teaching practice). – In fact all Finnish teachers, to start with, have to
complete a Master’s degree either in education or
in one or two teaching subjects.
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 28
…The reasons for better PISA results
in Finland
…d) Competent teachers
– Educating class teachers at universities and the
scope and the depths of their study program seem
to be the factors that make Finnish teacher
education stand out as special, when compared to
other countries.(Välijärvi et al., 2007)
• Teachers work independently and have strong
autonomy towards their work.
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 29
…The reasons for better PISA results
in Finland
e) Student counselling and special needs
education
• Individual support for the learning and welfare
of students is well accommodated, and the
national core curriculum contains guidelines
for the purpose.
• Special needs education is integrated into
regular education as far as possible.
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 30
…The reasons for better PISA results
in Finland
… e) Student counselling and special needs
education
• Guidance counselors help upper grade students
in their choice of further education and
studying methods.
• Student counselling is based on fast diagnosis
of learning problems and treatment of them
including special schools.
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 31
…The reasons for better PISA results
in Finland
f) Encouraging evaluation • The evaluation of the learning outcomes of
schools and students is encouraging and supportive by nature.
• The aim is to produce information that helps both schools and students to develop.
• There are no official national testing of learning outcomes, school ranking lists or inspection systems.
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 32
…The reasons for better PISA results
in Finland
g) Significance of education in society
• Finnish society strongly favors education and
the population is highly educated by
international standards.
• Education is appreciated and there is a broad
political consensus on education policy.
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 33
…The reasons for better PISA results
in Finland
h) A flexible system based on empowerment
• The education system is flexible and the
administration is strongly based on delegation
and support.
• Centralized steering is conducted through the
aims set by laws and decrees as well as by the
national core curriculum.
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 34
…The reasons for better PISA results
in Finland
…h) A flexible system based on empowerment
• Municipalities are responsible for the
organization of education and the
implementation of the aims.
• Schools and teachers have a lot of autonomy
in the provision and contents of education.
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 35
…The reasons for better PISA results
in Finland
i) The culture of a small border country
• The culture of a small border country (as in
Singapore and Taiwan); feeling that the people
could survive only with effort.
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 36
…The reasons for better PISA results
in Finland
j) Co-operation
• Interaction and building of partnerships are
sought at all levels of activity.
• There is co-operation for the development of
schools among various levels of
administration, among schools and among
other social actors and schools.
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 37
…The reasons for better PISA results
in Finland
…j) Co-operation
• Education authorities work in co-operation
with teachers’ organizations, subject
associations and school leadership
organizations.
• This has provided strong support for
development activities.
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 38
…The reasons for better PISA results
in Finland
k) Finland’s low rates of immigration and low
poverty rate may be a reason for its success
• The Finnish society is homogeneous. The
number of foreigners is lower than in most
OECD countries (2,9 % at the end of 2009),
which makes the teachers’ job easier.
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 39
…The reasons for better PISA results
in Finland
l) A student-oriented, active conception of
learning
• The organization of schoolwork and education
is based on a conception of learning that
focuses on students’ activity and interaction
with the teacher, other students and the
learning environment.
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 40
…The reasons for better PISA results
in Finland
m) The Finnish language
• Finnish spelling is regular, thus easing Finnish
schoolchildren’s task.
• Foreign TV programs are subtitled, instead of
dubbed as in many OECD countries, thus
easing acquisition of foreign languages.
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 41
• The success of Finnish students in PISA has been
a great joy, but at the same time a somewhat
puzzling experience to all those responsible for
and making decisions about education in Finland.
• At a single stroke, PISA has transformed our
conceptions of quality of the work done at our
comprehensive school, and of the foundations it
has laid for Finland’s future education and
development of knowledge.
Hely Westerholm, Ph.D., MBA 42
Summary