The fourth Baseline Technical Review (BTR) - Conventional Facilities and Siting

22-23 March 2012All changes made to the CFS 2007 Reference Design during the Technical Design Phase are to be presented by the CFS Technical Group for review by the GDE Project Manager Review team. Each change will be evaluated on the basis of performance, cost and impact on related systems. The Review team will produce a report to the GDE covering content, findings and decisions made at the BTR.

It is expected that the CFS BTR will be the last BTR leading up to the Technical Design Report. It represents the culmination of the Accelerator System and Main Linac Technology Baseline Technical Reviews held in the last 9 months. Each of the earlier BTR's included statements of impact on CFS. It is important to identify and summarize these at the final BTR.

Also, as the final BTR, any outstanding system-wide changes that have not already been properly completed should be presented and reviewed. The list of such changes will be drafted by the Project Managers, Cost Engineers and Technical Area Groups and may include, for example, path-length related topics.

CLOSEOUTILC GDE Project Managers, 23 March, 2012

TDR Key Elements:• An updated technical description of the ILC Technical Design in sufficient detail to justify the associated VALUE estimate.

• Results from critical R&D programmes and test facilities, which either demonstrate or support the choice of key parameters in the machine design.

• One or more models for a Project Implementation Plan, including scenarios for globally distributed mass-production of high-technology components as “in-kind” contributions.

• An updated and robust VALUE estimate and construction schedule consistent with the scope of the machine and the proposed Project Implementation Plan.

Cost-Containment

• Four Top-Level Baseline Changes were made in 2010/2011 to provide margin for changes in Value Estimate including:– Changes in scope (reduced bunches)– Changes in understanding (gradient spread, single

tunnel safety)– Consolidation (positron source, central region)

• Approximately 12% reduction in Value Estimate achieved – This is our baseline; TDR Value Estimate must be

consistent

Cost-Containment leverage:

CFS• Mature criteria• Proper Engineering• Reduced underground construction• Consolidated utilities• Documentation

Cost impact tablesChanges since RDR Mechanical Cost Impactsingle tunnel (see KCS)KCS SignificantDRFS NA (removed by project)BC1 NA (back to BC2)3.2 Km DR minor (based on load reduction)CR integration (e+ undulator move) minor (based on load reduction)Reduced bunch/Low power minor (based on load reduction)VE (high RF water delta T) minor (not much in KCS)VE (removal of centra l i zed chi l led water system in ML)

significant (warmer ML tunnel)

Civil?

Next Step: Analyze Cost Changes

• (had hoped to review those at BTR)• Develop action item list• Reaction to be expected – including changes, if

needed

• Action Items:

Accelerator System

• Damping Ring criteria – consistency with July 2011 tables

• Marx modulator • He Tank capacity• Survey / Alignment Criteria

Civil

• Very little cost information • Experimental hall• Service tunnel (from 10.2011 action item list)• Surface building criteria and cost• Egress passageways• Kamaboko construction / installation schedule

Electrical

• Load table including conventional• Transformer redundancy: 640 MVA total• Emergency Power • Compressor / Marx feed at high voltage• Marx power factor / central region power

factor• UPS criteria

Mechanical

• Tunnel fan-coil• Area-of-Refuge ducting• DP tank for accelerator tunnel water• Insulation for cavity loads