6
Eur J Wildl Res (20 11 ) 57: 9>-IOS DOl 10 .10071<10344·010-0-JOJ·, ORIGINAL PAPER The German wildlife information system (WILD): population densities and den use of red fo xes (Vulpes vulpes) and badgers (Meles meles) during 2003- 2007 in Germany Oli "c r Kculing • Gril Greiscr • Andreas G rau er • Egbc rl S rraun Mnrrlna llart ci-Sicinbnch • Roland Klein • Lud g er Wcn zcl.id cs • A rmin Winter Received: 22 Scp1cmbcr 2009 1 Rcvisl-d: II Moy 2010/ Accc:ptcd: 21 Moy 2010 1Publishcd online: S Jomc 2010 ' Springer - Verlag 2010 Abstract Moniloring the populations of badgers and red foxes may help us to manage tlte_o;e predator species as a mauer of wildlife conscrvarion and regulation. To fir the needs of a monitoring progranune, the mos t practicable method has to be sclcclcd. 1-l un ti ng bag srarislics deliver large but inaccurate data with low effon. Indirect and also oflen di rect counts rnighl deliver on ly presence- absence data with high effon. Direct couniS with high accumey arc very cosily. Den mappirtg by volumeer local hunters can de li ver reliable dara on density and addirional biological variab les while bei ng feasible and cos1 eflec1ive. Within reference orcas all O\ Cr Gennan y. fox and badger dens and liucrs were recorded, and spri ng and summer Communicated by II . Kic:rdorf 0. KculinJI A. Groucr · E. StrauB lrL<tirucc for \\C,Idlifc R=rch, VeccrioiOI)' Medicine University of 113nno,cr, Found3cion, Oamm IS. 30173 Hannover, Germany e-mail : Oli,·cr. Kculioglii tiho-banno-er.dc G. Grci<cr LFE. l:iberswaldc Forestry Compdence Cencre. lnsricuce of tl>c Publie l; nccrpci<e I' om Bmndenburg. Alfn:d·MC!II er-Scmllc I, 1622S !:belli\\ aide. G<:nnany M. Oanci·Stcinb.>ch · R. Klein· L \\'en,ctidc> J)qJarrment of Oiogcogrnphy. Uni,en.ily of Trier. Wi<-<cnseh.•O.<pork S4286 Trier. Gemm11y A. Winlcr Gennan lluntint! Associucion (Oetotschcr JagdschuiZ· \'crb:md c. V.). Johonncs ·llcni)'·SIT. 26, SJ ll 3 llonn. Genoony densi ti es cstimalcd as well as polcnlial annual population increases were calcu lated for 2003 2007. Habitat pn:ferences for breed i ng dens were c rl ,;o analysed. Addi t ionn l ly. in 2006. the distribulion of badgers surveyed by a natio nwide Fox and badger arc di all over Gennany with some small gaps and regionally differing der\si l ics . Du ring 1hc cnoniroring period. fox and badger densit ies and reproduction srayed stable. at a high level corresponding to hunring bags. llowever, dcnsiries varied betwee n geogmphical regions, wi tlt lower densities in the sparsely wooded lowland regions. A ! >reference for fores1 and h abi 1 a1s offering sheller was clear for breeding seus and dens. Badgers especiall y preferred sci IS of natural origin. Key words Moniloring · Reference areas · P op ular io n density· Sma ll game prcdarors · Manngcmcnl · Sell u.sage lnll ·oduction The Gcrmon wildlife information system "WILD" (Wi ldt i cr- lnfonnal ionssystcm der Uinder Dcurschlands) was founded in 200 I and is I he mon iloring progrrunme recording population si1.es of huntable game species throughout Gcnnany. T11c projccl was iniriotcd on behalf or the Gcmt:Ut huming (Deutscher Jagdsch utz- Verband e. V. (DJV)) a pcnnancnt inrcgral part of cnvironrnenr .al assessment wi tlt the aim of developing strat egies for conservarion and sustainable usc of game popu lar ions (see Slrnull ct al. 2008) by monitoring live animals of esr imating popularion sizes from hw11ing bags. Especially for crypr ic or mrc species. many detection errors persist wilhin any survey rncrhod (Elphick 2008). Therefore, with in twery rnoniroring programme. the mosl praCiicnble mC1hod has 10

The German wildlife information system (WILD): population ......vaccination against rnbies in 1986 (DJV 1990; Bellebaum 2003: Pegcl 2004). Since the late 1980s. the population has

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The German wildlife information system (WILD): population ......vaccination against rnbies in 1986 (DJV 1990; Bellebaum 2003: Pegcl 2004). Since the late 1980s. the population has

Eur J Wildl Res (20 11 ) 57:9>-IOS DOl 10.10071<10344·010-0-JOJ·,

ORIGINAL PAPER

The German wildlife information system (WILD): population densities and den use of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and badgers (Meles meles) during 2003- 2007 in Germany

Oli"cr Kculing • Gril Greiscr • Andreas G rauer • Egbcrl Srraun • Mnrrlna llartci-Sicinbnch • Roland Klein • Ludger Wcnzcl.idcs • Armin Winter

Received: 22 Scp1cmbcr 20091Rcvisl-d: II Moy 2010/ Accc:ptcd: 21 Moy 20101Publishcd online: S Jomc 2010 ' Springer-Verlag 2010

Abstract Moniloring the populations of badgers and red foxes may help us to manage tlte_o;e predator species as a mauer of wildlife conscrvarion and regulation. To fir the needs of a monitoring progranune, the most practicable method has to be sclcclcd. 1-lunting bag srarislics deliver large but inaccurate data amounL~ with low effon. Indirect and also oflen direct counts rnighl deliver on ly presence­absence data with high effon. Direct couniS with high accumey arc very cosily. Den mappirtg by volumeer local hunters can deliver reliable dara on density and addirional biological variables while being feasible and cos1 eflec1ive. Within reference orcas all O\•Cr Gennany. fox and badger dens and liucrs were recorded, and spring and summer

Communicated by II. Kic:rdorf

0 . KculinJI (~) • A. Groucr · E. StrauB lrL<tirucc for \\C,Idlifc R=rch, VeccrioiOI)' Medicine University of 113nno,cr, Found3cion, B~hof>holer Oamm IS. 30173 Hannover, Germany e-mail: Oli,·cr.Kculioglii tiho-banno-er.dc

G. Grci<cr LFE. l:iberswaldc Forestry Compdence Cencre. R~rch lnsricuce of tl>c Publie l;nccrpci<e I' om Bmndenburg. Alfn:d·MC!IIer-Scmllc I, 1622S !:belli\\ aide. G<:nnany

M. Oanci·Stcinb.>ch · R. Klein· L \\'en,ctidc> J)qJarrment of Oiogcogrnphy. Uni,en.ily of Trier. Wi<-<cnseh.•O.<pork Tricr-Pctri~bcrg. S4286 Trier. Gemm11y

A. Winlcr Gennan lluntint! Associucion (Oetotschcr JagdschuiZ· \'crb:md c. V.). Johonncs·llcni)'·SIT. 26, SJ ll 3 llonn. Genoony

densities cstimalcd as well as polcnlial annual population increases were calculated for 2003 2007. Habitat pn:ferences for breeding dens were crl,;o analysed. Additionnlly. in 2006. the distribulion of badgers wa.~ surveyed by a nationwide que~tionnairc. Fox and badger arc di tribut~'d all over Gennany with some small gaps and regionally differing der\silics. During 1hc cnoniroring period. fox and badger densities and reproduction srayed stable. at a high level corresponding to hunring bags. llowever, dcnsiries varied between geogmphical regions, witlt lower densities in the sparsely wooded lowland regions. A !>reference for fores1 and habi1a1s offering sheller was clear for breeding seus and dens. Badgers especially preferred sci IS of natural origin.

Keywords Moniloring · Reference areas · Popularion density· Small game prcdarors · Manngcmcnl · Sell u.sage

lnll·oduction

The Gcrmon wildlife information system "WILD" (Wildticr­lnfonnalionssystcm der Uinder Dcurschlands) was founded in 200 I and is I he fi~>l moniloring progrrunme recording population si1.es of huntable game species throughout Gcnnany. T11c projccl was iniriotcd on behalf or the Gcmt:Ut huming as.~i ation (Deutscher Jagdschutz-Verband e. V. (DJV)) ~ a pcnnancnt inrcgral part of cnvironrnenr.al assessment witlt the aim of developing strategies for conservarion and sustainable usc of game popular ions (see Slrnull ct al. 2008) by monitoring live animals in~tcod of esrimating popularion sizes from hw11ing bags. Especially for crypric or mrc species. many detection errors persist wilhin any survey rncrhod (Elphick 2008). Therefore, with in twery rnoniroring programme. the mosl praCiicnble mC1hod has 10

Page 2: The German wildlife information system (WILD): population ......vaccination against rnbies in 1986 (DJV 1990; Bellebaum 2003: Pegcl 2004). Since the late 1980s. the population has

96

be e~tabl islted, as different methods have diffen.'ltt levels of cost- benefit ratios, i.e. accuracy and pn.'Cision versus co>t cnlciency (Gaidel-Drapier et al. 2006; Lyra-Jorge et al. 2008: Vine ct al. 2009). Hunting bag statistics are most practic-.tl for large area mon i1oring. as 1hey deliver area-wide data casually. I hulling bags give a good view on loflg-tenn population tendencies; however. they depend very much on the willi ngness and ability of hunters as well as on weather conditioos (Gaillard et al. 2003: Grnuer and Konig 2009). Titerefore. WILD established a live survey network of so­called reference an.'aS. in which the densities of the European hare (Lep11s I!III'OfKieus. first results pn.--sented in StrauB et al. 2008). the red fox ( Vt~lpes l'lllpes). the badger (Metes metes). the carrion crow (Con~.s coro11e) and the hooded crow (Con.,s oomL<) arc n.'<:ordcd using srandordised methods (DJV 2003). As the accuracy of such live surveys depends a lot on accessibil ity to area and interaction with local people (Gaidet-Drnpicr ct al. 2006). the reference areas arc moniton::d by lhe local hunters. At periodical intcrvnls. other small game species arc estimated by querying hunters area­wide all over Gennany.

R~-d fox populations. as indicated by annual hunting bags. decreased in Gennany owing to rnbie..~ and the gas~ing of dens in lhc 1960s. Since g~ss ing ~lopped in the mid (FRG) and later (GDR) 1970s. the populn1ion increased a lit tle but remained ~table until the stan of vaccination against rnbies in 1986 (DJV 1990; Bellebaum 2003: Pegc l 2004). Since the late 1980s. the population has increased \'cry mpidly and has varied since 1995 at a high level. The annual hun ting bag in Gennnny increased from about 180.000 in the late 1960s to around 630.000 recently. with a tendency for a slight decrease (DJV 1990, 2009: Bellebaum 2003). Monitoring fox populations is imponant for the conservation of endangered prey spec ies. manage­ment of small game (Reynolds and Tapper 1995: Baker ct al. 2006) and for disease control (e.g. rabies or ech inococ­cosis. J3ellebaum 2003: Konig et al. 200R: Vos ct al. 200S).

Badger populations. as indicated by annual hunt ing bags. wen: reduced much more by rab ies and gassing (Schwie.-.r. and Wachcndiirfcr 1981 ) than was fox density. Since the end of gassing of selL~. the annual hunting bag has incrcas4.'<1 from less lhan 5.000 in the 1960s ond 1970s and now remains stable at a high level of about 50,000 since 2003 (DJV 1990. 2009: Pcgc l 200 I). However. reliable large-scale population data are sparse today in most parts of Europe (Gri fliths and Thomas 1997: Kowalczyk et al. 2000: Sleeman et al. 2009). Monitoring badgers is irnponanl for wildlife management (Eichstlidt and Roth 1997: Revilla et al. 200 I: Sleeman et al. 2009). agricultural dnmoge (Roper e1 al. 1995: Moore et al. 1999: Schley 2000: De lahay et al. 2009) and disease contro l (e.g. bovine tuberculosis in Britain and Ireland, Griffin et al. 2005: Woodroffe ct al. 2008).

t) Springu

Eur J \\C,Idl Res (2011) S7:9S lOS

Our aims were to assess densities and density changes of foxes Md badgers in Gcnnany betw<.'Cn lite years 2003 and 2007 as well as to monitor di nerences of densities between geographical regions. We discuss tl1c rel iab ility of the methods and data. Addilionally, we queried the distribution of badgers from every Gem1an hunting ground. Besides po1mlation data. also habitat parnmeters for breeding dens were evaluated from 1he mapping data. The data from WILD may serve as a basis for funher research.

Material and methods

Since 2002. the project has estab lished more than 800 reference areas. rnndornly distributed over all Gennun agricultural regions. Tite mean size of these reference areas is 738 hn (min imum 95, maximum 4,500 ho). For sevcml reasons (e.g. organisational matters and weather). the number of reference areas providing data differs between years. In lotal, 360 reference areas delivered density data for fox ond badger populations.

Hunters moni toring the rcfcren4.'C areas were instmcted and trained according to the WILD manual. which includes dctn ilcd descriptions of the methods used (OJV 2003). The local hunters fami liar with their hunting ground.~ map all fox dens and badger sens c' cry 11 inter. Thcrclore. the humers visit every known den and sell. Additiona lly. lltey search for dens and scus sy~tematically. Unknown dens might be found by following fox and badger tracks in winter (Briedennnnn and Dittrich 1982: Stubbe 1989). especially during fox mating and in snow (January and Febntary). In spring, during rearing of puppies (April June). the hunters control the mapped dens and sctts and noted severn! parruncters: type. location and habitat of den. number of entrances. inhabited or not. species inhabiting. breeding den or nol, Iilier size and additional notes.

The sex rotio of red foxes is male biassed (Goretzk i and Paustian 1982; Tryjanowski et aL 2009). Thus. for calculating the minimum spring fox density. we multiplied the number of litters by the factor 2.5. adding non­rcproducth c females and surplus males to the litters' parents (\V(mdclcr t111d Uips 1993: Stubbe and Stubbe 1995). l'olential minimwn summer densities were calculated by adding the spring adult d<.:nsity and cub density. The cub density was the observed mean number of cubs per Iiller at the breeding den mu ltiplied by lhc number of ob~cd litters.

For calculating badger densities. every scu was observed carefully during spring and early summer. to record the liuer density and size. The sex ratio of badgers was assumed to be I: I (Macdomtld and cwman 2002). although I)OI>ulations arc ol1cn slightly female biassed (Do Linh San 2002). As badgers live in their setts all the year.

Page 3: The German wildlife information system (WILD): population ......vaccination against rnbies in 1986 (DJV 1990; Bellebaum 2003: Pegcl 2004). Since the late 1980s. the population has

~eferences cshl

I. Baker PJ, Funk SM, Harri> S, White PCL (2000) FleXJble spatial organization of urban foxes, Vulpes v11lpes, before and during an

outbreak ofsarcoptic mange. Anon Behav 59:127- 146 CrossRef

2. Baker P J, Furlong M, Southern S, Harri> S (2006) The potential impact of red fox Vulpes vulpes predation i1 agricultural landscapes in

lowland Britain. Wilcll Biol12:39-50 CrossRef

3. Barton KA, Zalewski A (2007) Wi1ter severty lirrits red fOx populations in F.urasia. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:281- 289 CrossRef

4. Behrendt G (1955) Beitliige :zur Okologie des Rotfuchses (Vulpes v11lpes L.) . Z Jagdwi>s I :113- 145 CrossRef

5. Bellebaum J (2003) Bestandsentwickhmg des Fuchses in Ostdeutschland vor und nach der Tollwutimpfung. Z Jagdwiss 49:41-49 CrossRef

6. BfN (2008) Daten zur Natur. Bundesanll fiir Naturschutz, BoiUl

7. BriedemJaiUl L, Dittrich G ( 1982) Die Fuchsstrecke in der DDR in Beziehung zu einigen okologi>chen Faktoren. Beitr Jagd- u Wiklforschung

12:60-67

8. Broekhuizen S, Derckx H ( 1996) Durcbliisse fiir Dachse und ihre Etrektivitlit. Z Jagdwiss 42:134-142 CrossRef

9. Breseth H, Bevangar K, Knutsen B (1997) Function of multiple badger Meles meles sens: distribution and utilisation. Wikll Biol3:89- 96

I 0. Cavanini P, Santini S (1996) Reproduction of the red fox Vulpes vulpes in Central Italy. Ann Zoo I Fe1Ul33:267- 274

I I. da Silva J, Woodrotre R, Macdonakl OW (1993) Habitat, fOod a\<ailability and group territoriality in the European badger, Meles meles.

Oecologia 95:558-564

12. Dekker JJA, Stein A, Heitkonig IMA (200 I) A spatial analysis of a population of red fox (Vulpes v11lpes) in the Dutch coastal dune area. J

Zool255:505-510 CrossRef

13. Delahay R, Carter SP, Forrester GJ, MitcheU A, Cheeseman CL (2006) Habitat correlates of group size, bodyweigbt and reproduct:i\<e

perfonmnce in a high-density Eurasian badger (Meles meles) population. J Zool270:437-447. doi:l O. l l ll/j. l469-7998.2006.00 165.x

Cross Ref

14. Delahay RJ, Ward AJ, Walker N, Long B, Cheeseman CL (2007) Distnbution of badger latrines in a high-density population: l1abitat

selection and anplications fOr the transmission of bovine ruberculosi> to cattle. J Zool 272:31 1- 320. doi: I O. l l ll/j. l469-

7998.2006.00271 .x CrossRef

15. Delahay RJ, Davison J, Poole OW, Matthews AJ, Wilson CJ, Heydon MJ, Roper TJ (2009) Managing conflict between luumns and

wildlite: trends in licensed operations to resol\<e problems with badgers Meles meles in England. Manlll181 Rev 39:53-66.

doi:l O.ll l lfj. l365-2907.2008.00135.x CrossRef

16. Die:zel KE (1983) Die:zels Niederjagd, 23rd edn. Paul Parey, Hamburg

17. DN (1990) DN -Handbuch 1990. Verlag Dieter Hoffimnn, Mainz

18. DN (2003) Wikltier-Infonmtionssystem der Lander Deutschlands (WILD). Projektbandbuch. Jagdschutz-Verband e. V, Deutscher

19. DN (2009) Jahresstrecken. jagd-online, Deutscher Jagdschutz Verband. http1/www.jagd-online.de/datenfukte..Vjahresstrecken

20. Do Linh SanE (2002) Biologie et ecologie du blaireau Meles meles (Mustelidae, Carnivora) dans Ia Broye: resultats preliminaires. BuD Soc

vaud Sci nat 88:77- 119

21 . Do Linh SanE, Ferrari N, Weber J-M (2007) Spatio-temporal ecology and density of badgers Meles meles in the Swi>s Jura Mountains.

Eur J Wikll Res 53:265- 275. doi:l 0. 1 007/s I 0344-006-0085-8 Cross Ref

22. Doncaster CP (200 I) What detennines territory configurations ofbadgers? Oikos 93:497-498 CrossRef

23. Eichstadt H, Rotb M ( 1997) Auswirkungen der Verkehrsmortalitiit auf populationsokologi>che Parameter des Dach.-;es (Meles meles L.

1758). Beitr Jagd- u WiklfOrschung 22:249-256

24. Elphick CS (2008) How you colDlt cotDlts: the anportance ofmetbods research in applied ecology. J Appl Ecol45:1313- 1320.

doi:l O.ll l lfj. l365-2664.2008.0 1545.x Cross Ref

Page 4: The German wildlife information system (WILD): population ......vaccination against rnbies in 1986 (DJV 1990; Bellebaum 2003: Pegcl 2004). Since the late 1980s. the population has

25. FrantzAC, Schaul M, Pope LC, Fack F, Schl:y L, Muller CP, Roper TJ (2004) Estirmting popuhtiln size by genotyping remotely pi.Jcked

bar: the Eurasian badger. J Appl Ecol4 1 :985-995 CrossRef

26. Frederiksen M, Hearn RD, MitcheD C, Sigfilsson A, Swam RL, Fox AD (2004) The dynami:s ofhlDlted Icelandic goose populatilns: a

reassessment of the evidence. J Appl Ecol4 I J 15- 334 CrossRef

27. Fw* SM ( 1994) Zur Dichteabmngigkeil der rnumli:hen und sozial:n Organisation und der Reproduktiln beim Rotfuclts ( VuljJes vutpes L.):

Eine Studie bei zeitlich und r'Jw111ich durch Ja!!P und Tol~ru v•riierenden Popuhtilrodi:hten in Siidwest· Deutscltland ll1d Ost-Frankrei:lt

Dissertatiln, Universitiit des Saarlandes Saarbliicken

28. Gaidet·Drapier N, Fritz H, Bougarel M, Renaud PC, Po il:cot P, Chardonnet P, Coid C, Poulet 0, LeBel S (2006) Cost and efliciencyof

large mammal census techniques: comparison of methods lOr a particpatory approach in a comrwnal area, Zirrbabwe. Biodiv Conserv

15:735- 754 CrossRef

29. Gaillard J· M, Dunean P, Delonroe 0, van Laere G, Pettorelli N, Maillard 0, Renaud G (2003) Ef!ects ofhurri:ane Lothar on the popuhtion

dynamics of roe deer. J Wildl Manage 67:767- 773 CrossRef

30. Gloor S, Bontadila F, Hegglil 0 , Deplazes P, Breitenmoser U (2001) The rise of urban lOx popuhtions in Switzerland. Marrrn Bioi

66:155- 164

31. Good T, Hindeniallg K, lmfi:ld S, Nievergek B (200 I) A habitat analysis ofbadger (Metes metes) setts in a se.nU-nattral li>rest. Marr.-n Bioi

66:204-214

32. Goretzki J, Pa11stian K· H (1982) Zll" Biologic des Rotfucmes VuljJes vutpes (L, 1758) in einem iJiensiv lamwirtschaftlich genutzten

Gebi:t. Beitr Ja!!P· u Wildli>rschung I 2:96- I 07

33. Gmuer A, Konig A (2009) Management ofchan10is in Bavaria (Germany): the importance of game activiti:s in scabies conbUL Wildl Bioi

Pract 5:1 15-127. doi:l 0.2461/wbp.2009.5.12 CrossRef

34. Grauer A, GreiserG, Keulilg 0, Kl:in R, Straull E, Wenzelides L, Winter A (2009) Wildti:r- JniOnmtionssystem der Liinder Deutschlams.

Status ll1d Entwi:khmg ausgewahher Wildti:rarten il Dewchland. Ja!!Pschutz· Verband e.V, Deutscher

35. Griffin JM, Willian-,; DH, KeDy GE, Clegg TA, O'Boyl: I, Collins JD, More SJ (2005) The il1pact of badger removal on the control of

tuberculosis il cattle herds in Ireland. Prev Vet Med 67:237- 266 CrossRef

36. Griffiths HI, Thorms DH ( 1997) The conservatiln and nnnagement of the European badger Metes metes. Cmmcil of Europe, Report.

Nature am envimnn10nt 90

37. Grilo C, Bissonette JA, Santos-Reis M (2009) Spatial-temporal patterns in Mediterranean carnivore road casuahi:s: consequences lOr

mitigation. Bioi Conserv I 42:30 J- 3 I 3. dod 0.10 16/j.biocon2008.1 0.026 CrossRef

38. Heydon MJ, Reynolds JC (2000a) Den10graphy ofrural li>xes (Vutpes vuipes) in relation to cuR iltensity in three contrasting regions of

Britain. J Zool25 I :256-276

39. Heydon MJ, Reynolds JC (2000b) Fox ( VuljJes vutpes) managen10nt il three cowasting regions of Britain, in relatiln to agri:uhural am

sporting interests. J Zoo125 I :237- 252 CrossRef

40. Heydon MJ, Reynolds JC, Short MJ (2000) Variatiln in abundance ofli>xes (Vutpes vutpes) between three regions of rural Britain, in

relation to landscape and other variables. J Zoo125 I :253- 264 CrossRef

41. Jacobs J ( 1974) Qwntitative measurement ofli>od selection. A n10difi:atiln of the IOrage ratio am lvlev's electivity index. Oecologia

14:413-417 CrossRef

42. Jankowiak L., Antczak M, TIY.ianowski P (2008) Habitat use, IOod and the importance ofpoukl)l il the diet of the red lOx Vutpes vuljJeS in

extensive lilrniam in PolaOO. World Appl Sci J 4:886-890

43. Kalchreuter H (2003) Di: Sache mit der Ja!!P, 5th edn. Frankb-Kos010s Verla&' GrrbH & Co., Sttntgart

44. Keuling 0 (2007) Sauen als Beutegreifi:r • Welchen Eilthlss kann Schwarzwild auf andere Ti:rarten a11siiben? in: 13. Osterreichische

Jagertagung, 13. und 14. Februar2007.45-50

45. Konig A, Romig T, Janko C, Hildenbram R, Holzhofi:r E, Kotulski Y, Ludt C, Merli M, Eggenhoter S, Thoma 0, Vilsn>Oier J, Zannantonio

D (2008) Integrated-baiting concept agait-..t Echinococcus multitocutaris in li>xes is successful in southern Bavaria, Germany. Ell" J Wild I

Res 54:439-447. dod 0.1007/s l 0344-007-0168· I CrossRef

46. Kowalczyk R, BtulOvi:h AN, J~drzejev.>ska B (2000) Badger density am distrnutiln ofsetts il Bialowieia Primeval Forest (Poland and

Page 5: The German wildlife information system (WILD): population ......vaccination against rnbies in 1986 (DJV 1990; Bellebaum 2003: Pegcl 2004). Since the late 1980s. the population has

Belaru>) co!T{lared to other Eurasnn populations. Acta Theriol45:395-408

47. Loureiro F, Rosalino LM, Macdonald OW, Santos-Reis M (2007) Use ofnl.Jltiple den sites by Eurasnn badgers, Metes metes, in a

Mediterranean habitat. Zool Sci 24:97&-985 CrossRef

48. L)ra-Jorge MC, Ciocheti G, Pi,<ello VR Mei-ell:s ST (2008) Comparing rrcthods fur sampling large· and rrcdiun;sized ~mrrmals: carrcra

tmps and track plot>. Eur J Wild! Res 54:739-744. doi:l 0.1 007/s I 0344-008-0205· 8 CrossRef

49. Macdonald OW, Ne>mnn C (2002) Population d)mmics ofbadgers (Metes metes) in Oxfilrdshire, U.K.: raurb ers, density and cohort lifu

histories, and a possible role of clirmte change in population gro"th. J Zool256:121 - 138 CrossRef

50. Moore N, Whiterow A, Kelly P, Garthwaite 0 , Bishop J, Langton S, Cheesennn C ( 1999) Surveyofbadger Metes metes dannge to

agriculture in England and Wales. J Appl Eco136:974-988 CrossRef

51. Noack M, Goretzki J ( 1999) Kartienmg "'" Rotfuchs· und Dachsbauen al; Grundlage fiir die Bestandsschiitzung von Rotfuchs und Daclt>

itn Nationalpark ''Unteres Odertaf'. Beitr Jagd· u Wildfi>rsc!J.mg 24:307- 330

52. Palomares F, Ruiz-Martinez I ( 1994) Die Dichte des Rotfuchses und die Bette an Niedem; k! w'Jirend der Periode der Jungenaufzucht itn

Siidosten Spaniens. Z Jagdwiss 40:145-155 CrossRef

53. Palphrarnand KL, Newton-Cross G, White PCL (2007) Spatial 0!1¥nization and behaviour ofbadgers (Metes metes) in a moderate-density

population. Behav Ecol Sociobiol61 :401-413. dod 0.1 007/s00265-006-0268·z CrossRef

54. Pegel M (200 I ) Zur Bestandssintation des Dachses il Baden· Wiirttemberg. WFS· Mitteihmgen I :1-4

55. Pegel M (2004) Fu::hsbejagung • Sinn oder Unsinn? WFS· Mitteil.mgen I: 1-4

56. Revilla E, Palomares F (200 I) Difli:rences il key habitat ll>e between dominant and subordinate ani11ak iltmterritoml dominance payoffi; il

Eurasian badgers? CanJ Zool79:165- 170. dod 0.1139-cjz· 79· 1·165 CrossRef

57. Revilla E, Palomares F, Delibes M (200 I) Edge-core effucts and the effuctiveness of traditional reserves in conservation: Eurasian badgers in

Doiiana National Park Conserv Bioi 15:14&-158

58. Reynokls JC, Tapper SC (1 995) The ecology of the red fi>x Vulpes vulpes in relation to snnR game in rural southern England. Wild I Bioi

1:105-119

59. Rogers LM, Forrester GJ, Wilson GJ, YarneD RW, Cheese~mn CL (2003) The role ofsetts in badger (Metes metes) group size, breeding

su::ces.' and status o fTB (Mycobacterium bovi•). J Zool260:209-2 15 Cros.,Ref

60. Roper TJ, Findlay SR Liips P, Shepherdson OJ (1995) D-• nnge by badgers Me/es me/es to wheat Triticum vulgare and barley Hordeum

sarivum crops. J Appl Ecol32:72(}-726 CrossRef

61. Roper TJ, Ostler JR Schmid TK, Christian SF (200 I) Sett use in European badgers Metes metes. Behaviour 138:173- 187 Cros.,Ref

62. Rosalino LM, Macdonald OW, Santos- Reis M (2005) Resource dispersion and badger population density in Mediterranean woodlands: is

rood, water or geology the li11iting fuctor? O ikos II 0:441-452 Cros.,Ref

63. Sadlier LMJ, Web bon CC, Baker PJ, Harri> S (2004) Metlxxls ofmonitorilg red IOxes VuljJes vulpes and badgers Me/es me/es: are fiekl

signs the answer? Mamnnl Rev 34:75-98 CrossRef

64. Schley L (2000) The badger Meles metes and the ";k! boar Sus scrofa: distribution and dannge to agriculural crops in Luxerrbourg. PhD

thesis, University ofSus.,ex, East Sus."'x

65. Schwierz G, Wachendorfur G ( 1981) Studie iiber die Ursachen des starl<en Riickganges der Dachspopulation in Hessen itn Zeitraurn 1952·

1977. ZJagdwiss 27:145- 153 CrossRef

66. Selois V, Vik JO (2006) Possible itnpact of snow depth and ungulate carca.<;."'s on red fi>x (Vulpes vuljJes) populations in Nom<~y, 1897-

1976. J Zool269:299-308 Cros.,Ref

67. Sleennn DP, Davenport J, More SJ, Clegg TA, Collins JD, Martil SW, W~liarn; DH, Griffin JM, O'Boyle I (2009) How nnny Eumsian

badgers Mele.<rne/es L. are there in the Republic oflreland? Eur J Wild! Res 55:333-344. dod 0.1007/sl0344-008· 0244-l CrossRef

68. Stiebling U ( 1997) Zur Habitatmrtzung des Rotfuchses Vulpes vulpes (L., 1758) in der uckentiirkischen Agrarlandschali: Anlage der Baue.

Beitr Jagd· u Wiklfi>rschung 22:201- 209

69. Stiebling U ( 1998) Der Rotfuclt>, Vrrlpes vrrljJes (L., 1758), itn Biosphiirenresen 'llt Sehorfheide-Chorin. Nat Schutz Landsch I :89-92

70. Stiebling U, Scllleider R ( 1999) Zur Habitalwlzlllg des Rotn.:hses Vrrlpes vrrljJes (L. 1758) in der uckerrriirl<ischen Agrarlandschaft •

Page 6: The German wildlife information system (WILD): population ......vaccination against rnbies in 1986 (DJV 1990; Bellebaum 2003: Pegcl 2004). Since the late 1980s. the population has

Ergebnisse zur Populationo;di::hte lU1d · d)narnik. Beitr Jagd· u Wildror.;chung 24:33 1- 341

71. Straul3 E, Grauer A, Bartel M, Kleil R, Wenzelides l, Greiser G, Muchin A, Nose! H, Winter A (2008) The Genmn wild tire inlOrnntion

system population densities and development of European Hare (Lepus europaeus PALLAS) dtuing 2002-2005 in Genmny. Etr J Wild I

Res 54:142- 147 CrossRef

72. Stubbe M (1989) Die okolog>;chen GrlUldlagen :rur Bewirtschaftmg des IJ•chses Meles meles (l. 1758) il der DDR. In: Stubbe M (ed)

Populations6kologie rnuderartiger Saugetiere, Bd. 2. Universitiit Halle, Halle, pp 543- 552

73. Stubbe M, Stubbe A ( 1995) Das Populationsdynanngranm eiles Fuchsbestandes. Methoden der li:ldoko log>;chen Siiugeti::rror.;c!J.Jng

1:147- 160

74. Tryjano-.~ki P, Sparks TH, Kamieniarz R, Panek M (2009) The relationship between huntilg methods and sex, age and body weight in a

non-trophy anima~ the red lOx. Wildl Res 36:106-109 CrossRef

75. TU)ttens FAM, Long B, Fawcett T, Skirmer A, Brown JA, Cheeseman CL, RoddamAW, Macdonald OW (2001) Estirmtinggmup size

and population density of Eurasian badgers Meles meles by quantiJ).jng latrine use. J Appl Ecol38:1114-112 1 CrossRef

76. Vine SJ, Crowther MS, Lapidge SJ, Dickman CR, Mooney N, Piggott MP, English AW (2009) Comparisonofn-ethods to detect rare and

CI)'Jltic species: a case study using tre red lOx (Vulpes vuljJes). Wild I Res 36:436-446. doi:l 0.1 07 1/wr08069 CrossRef

77. Vos A, Selhorst T, Schroder R, Mulder J (2008) Feasibility of oral rabies vaccination can1'3igns IOxes (Vulpes vuljJes) again<! rabies in

surm-er. Eur J Wildl Res 54:763- 766. doi:IO.I007/s l0344· 008· 0 198· 3 CrossRef

78. WaDiser G, Roth M ( 1997) EinOull der LandschaliS21:r.;chnittenheillUld des Landnutzungsnl.JSters auf die Raurn-Zeitstruktur des Dacltses

(Meles meles L., 1758). Beitr Jagd· u Wildrorschung22:237- 247

79. Wandeler A, liips P (1993) Rotfuclts.ln: Stubbe M, Krapp F (eds) HandbuchderSaugetiere Europas, Raubsauger(Teilii) . AULA·

Verlag, Wi::sbaden, pp 139-193

80. Weber J.M, Meia J. s ( 1996) Habiat use by tre red roy Vulpes vulpes in a mountailo11s area. Ethol Ecol Evol8:223- 232 CrossRef

81. Wilson GJ, Delahay R, de Leeuw ANS, Spyvee PO, HandoU D (2003) Quantification ofbadger (Meles meles) sett activity as a method of

predi::ting badger number.;. J Zool259:49- 56 CrossRef

82. Woodroffu R, Gilks P, Johnston WT, Le Fevre AM, Cox DR, Donnelly CA, Bourne FJ, Cheeseman Cl, Gettirby G, Mcinerney JP,

Moni;on WI (2008) Effucts of cuUing on badger ablUldance: il1plications lOr tuberculosis cowol J Zool274:28- 37