26
The human microbiome and colorectal cancer Emily Vogtmann, PhD, MPH Research Fellow Metabolic Epidemiology Branch Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics April 20, 2017

The human microbiome and colorectal cancer · Quality control standards to evaluate reproducibility Standardization of methods for extraction, sequencing, and bioinformatics for data

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The human microbiome and colorectal cancer · Quality control standards to evaluate reproducibility Standardization of methods for extraction, sequencing, and bioinformatics for data

The human microbiome and colorectal cancer

Emily Vogtmann, PhD, MPH

Research Fellow

Metabolic Epidemiology Branch

Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics

April 20, 2017

Page 2: The human microbiome and colorectal cancer · Quality control standards to evaluate reproducibility Standardization of methods for extraction, sequencing, and bioinformatics for data

2

Outline

Introduction to the human microbiome Technologies to assess the microbiomeHuman microbiome and colorectal cancer Future directions

Page 3: The human microbiome and colorectal cancer · Quality control standards to evaluate reproducibility Standardization of methods for extraction, sequencing, and bioinformatics for data

3

Outline

Introduction to the human microbiome Technologies to assess the microbiomeHuman microbiome and colorectal cancer Future directions

Page 4: The human microbiome and colorectal cancer · Quality control standards to evaluate reproducibility Standardization of methods for extraction, sequencing, and bioinformatics for data

4

Microbiota and the tree of life

Microbes Bacteria Archaea Fungi Protists Viruses

Microbiome: collection of microbial genes

Kutschera (2011) Biol Direct & Pace (1997) Science

Page 5: The human microbiome and colorectal cancer · Quality control standards to evaluate reproducibility Standardization of methods for extraction, sequencing, and bioinformatics for data

5

Alpha and beta diversity

Forest 1 Forest 2

Alpha diversity = 3 Alpha diversity = 6

Alpha diversity• Counts (Taxonomy/OTUs)• Shannon index• Simpson index• Chao1• PD tree

Beta diversity• Bray-Curtis• UniFrac

Beta diversity2 shared5 different

Page 6: The human microbiome and colorectal cancer · Quality control standards to evaluate reproducibility Standardization of methods for extraction, sequencing, and bioinformatics for data

6

PCoA plot: Clustering by body site

The Human Microbiome Project Consortium (2012) Nature

Page 7: The human microbiome and colorectal cancer · Quality control standards to evaluate reproducibility Standardization of methods for extraction, sequencing, and bioinformatics for data

7

Outline

Introduction to the human microbiome Technologies to assess the microbiomeHuman microbiome and colorectal cancer Future directions

Page 8: The human microbiome and colorectal cancer · Quality control standards to evaluate reproducibility Standardization of methods for extraction, sequencing, and bioinformatics for data

8

History of microbial research

Image: http://learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/microbiome/study/

Page 9: The human microbiome and colorectal cancer · Quality control standards to evaluate reproducibility Standardization of methods for extraction, sequencing, and bioinformatics for data

9

Present day study

Images from: http://legacy.owensboro.kctcs.edu/gcaplan/anat2/study%20guides/apii%20study%20guide%20k%20digestive%20anatomy.htm, http://davidql.github.io/scope_talk/emoji_poop.png, http://dnatech.genomecenter.ucdavis.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Miseq.png, and reproductions from Morgan XC et al. (2012) PLoS Comp Biol

Page 10: The human microbiome and colorectal cancer · Quality control standards to evaluate reproducibility Standardization of methods for extraction, sequencing, and bioinformatics for data

10

Fecal collection methods

No Solution RNAlater 95% Ethanol

Page 11: The human microbiome and colorectal cancer · Quality control standards to evaluate reproducibility Standardization of methods for extraction, sequencing, and bioinformatics for data

11

Stability

Vogtmann, et al (2017) AJE

Page 12: The human microbiome and colorectal cancer · Quality control standards to evaluate reproducibility Standardization of methods for extraction, sequencing, and bioinformatics for data

12

Accuracy

Vogtmann, et al (2017) AJE

Page 13: The human microbiome and colorectal cancer · Quality control standards to evaluate reproducibility Standardization of methods for extraction, sequencing, and bioinformatics for data

13

Outline

Introduction to the human microbiome Technologies to assess the microbiomeHuman microbiome and colorectal cancer Future directions

Page 14: The human microbiome and colorectal cancer · Quality control standards to evaluate reproducibility Standardization of methods for extraction, sequencing, and bioinformatics for data

14

Colorectal cancer worldwide

Page 15: The human microbiome and colorectal cancer · Quality control standards to evaluate reproducibility Standardization of methods for extraction, sequencing, and bioinformatics for data

15

Meat and colorectal cancer

Cancer Research UK (http://gloriousnutrition.co.uk/processed-meat-popularity-decreasing-due-to-cancer-link/)

Page 16: The human microbiome and colorectal cancer · Quality control standards to evaluate reproducibility Standardization of methods for extraction, sequencing, and bioinformatics for data

16

Meat and the gut microbiome

David et al (2014) Nature

Page 17: The human microbiome and colorectal cancer · Quality control standards to evaluate reproducibility Standardization of methods for extraction, sequencing, and bioinformatics for data

17

Microbiome and colorectal cancer (U.S.)

Ahn et al (2013) JNCI

Page 18: The human microbiome and colorectal cancer · Quality control standards to evaluate reproducibility Standardization of methods for extraction, sequencing, and bioinformatics for data

18

Microbiome and colorectal cancer (U.S.)

Ahn et al (2013) JNCI

Case enrichment

• Fusobacterium

• Veillonellaceae• Anaerovorax

• Porphyromonas

• Atopobium

Control enrichment

• Firmicutes overall• Lachnospiraceae

Page 19: The human microbiome and colorectal cancer · Quality control standards to evaluate reproducibility Standardization of methods for extraction, sequencing, and bioinformatics for data

19

Meta-analysis of 16S rRNA gene studies

Shah et al (2017) Gut

Page 20: The human microbiome and colorectal cancer · Quality control standards to evaluate reproducibility Standardization of methods for extraction, sequencing, and bioinformatics for data

20

Meta-analysis of 16S rRNA gene studies

Shah et al (2017) Gut

Page 21: The human microbiome and colorectal cancer · Quality control standards to evaluate reproducibility Standardization of methods for extraction, sequencing, and bioinformatics for data

21

Potential mechanisms

Drewes et al (2016) BJC

Page 22: The human microbiome and colorectal cancer · Quality control standards to evaluate reproducibility Standardization of methods for extraction, sequencing, and bioinformatics for data

22

Conclusions

There is promise for fecal microbial markers to enhance FOBT or FIT tests for colorectal cancer screening

All previous studies have been cross-sectional

Prospective studies (and studies with multiple serial samples) are needed to understand microbial associations with colorectal cancer etiology

Page 23: The human microbiome and colorectal cancer · Quality control standards to evaluate reproducibility Standardization of methods for extraction, sequencing, and bioinformatics for data

23

Outline

Introduction to the human microbiome Technologies to assess the microbiomeHuman microbiome and colorectal cancer Future directions

Page 24: The human microbiome and colorectal cancer · Quality control standards to evaluate reproducibility Standardization of methods for extraction, sequencing, and bioinformatics for data

24

Future directions

Optimization of collection method for multiple technologies

Collect fecal samples in prospective cohort studies

Quality control standards to evaluate reproducibility

Standardization of methods for extraction, sequencing, and bioinformatics for data pooling and meta-analyses

Page 25: The human microbiome and colorectal cancer · Quality control standards to evaluate reproducibility Standardization of methods for extraction, sequencing, and bioinformatics for data

25

Acknowledgements DCEG Metabolic Epidemiology Branch

Christian Abnet

Gwen Murphy

Rashmi Sinha

DCEG Biostatistics Branch

Jianxin Shi

Xing Hua

Yunhu Wan

DCEG Cancer Genomics Research Laboratory

Belynda Hicks

Amy Hutchinson

Kristie Jones

Casey Dagnall

Shalabh Suman

Bin Zhu

University of Maryland

Owen White

UCSD

Rob Knight

Amnon Amir

University of Guelph

Emma Allen-Vercoe

Mayo Clinic

Nicholas Chia

Jun Chen

Heidi Nelson

Harvard University

Curtis Huttenhower

Page 26: The human microbiome and colorectal cancer · Quality control standards to evaluate reproducibility Standardization of methods for extraction, sequencing, and bioinformatics for data

www.cancer.gov www.cancer.gov/espanol