Upload
lethu
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Daniele Lantagne, PhD, PETufts University
The HWTS M&E Toolkit:
Work‐to‐date and Way Forward
Origins of the M&E Toolkit
Health impact Important, critical, necessary Outside the ability of most M&E staff
Monitoring is the routine assessment of a program’s activities Primary objective of measuring whether activities are carried out
as planned.
Evaluation is the systematic assessment of whether a program has achieved its proposed objective
Outputs/outcomes are more easily measured than impact
Icddr,bNeed for an M&E Toolkit
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21Intervention Week
0
20
40
60
80
100
% F
amili
es
Number FamiliesPicking Up Product
Percent FamiliesPicking up Product
Baseline Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4
# children/HH surveyed 49 48 40 29 12
# children suffered diarrhea
20 5 1 1 0
% children with diarrhea of total surveys
41% 10% 3% 3% 0%
Standard indicators
Reported & observed use– Self‐report treating drinking water– Observation of drinking‐water treatment – Self‐report safely storing water– Observation of safely stored drinking‐water
Standard indicators
Correct, consistent use and storage– Knowledge of correct use– Demonstration of correct use– Demonstration of safe water extraction– Frequency of non‐use by most vulnerable– Consistently treating drinking water – Use of improved drinking water
Standard indicators
Knowledge and behaviour– Knoweldge of at least 1 HWTS method– Receiving messaging/training on HWTS– Access to HWTS products– Personal norm for treating water– Confidence in improving the quality of water– Community support in treating water
Standard indicators
Other EH interventions– Knowledge of EH interventions– Use of EH interventions
Water quality– Effective use– FCR