Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
THE INFLUENCE OF PAYTREN MLM AND AGENT
ATTRIBUTES ON WILLINGNESS TO UNDERTAKE
MULTILEVEL MARKETING AS
A CAREER OPTION
By
Dewi Salindri
014201400040
A Skripsi presented to the
Faculty of Business President University
in partial fulfillment of the requirements for
Bachelor Degree in Business Major in Management
March 2018
i
ii
DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY
I declare that this Skripsi, entitled “THE INFLUENCE OF PAYTREN
MLM AND AGENT ATTRIBUTES ON WILLINGNESS TO
UNDERTAKE MULTILEVEL MARKETING AS A CAREER
OPTION” is to the best of my knowledge and belief, an original piece of
work that has not been submitted, either in whole or in part, to another
university to obtain a degree.
Cikarang, Indonesia, 29thMarch 2018
Dewi Salindri
014201400040
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First of all, I would like to say big thanks and gratitude to Allah SWT who has given
me fluency and ease until finally able to finish this Skripsi. I also very grateful for the
help and support from people closest to me because I am nothing without them.
Therefore, I would like to express my deepest gratitude and appreciation to:
1. The persons I love most in this world, my parents. There are neither words nor
deeds enough for me to repay all the unconditional love, endless support, and
prayers they have given me. I amwholeheartedly very grateful and this Skripsi
I dedicate to them.
2. Mr. Jhanghiz Syahrivar, MM, my advisor who has guided and gave me
uncountable valuable advises for me so that I can finish this Skripsi well.
Thank you so much for giving me many worthwhile knowledges.
3. My very special friend, Annisa who are always willing to help whenever I
need, always give supports, and motivations.
4. My beloved friends, Trixie Jacqualine, Moza Andini, Pratiwi Citra Bella,
Shafa Insi Nafarani, Silvi renita, Meilisa Audina, Rinika Elmanti, Vincent
Bonavisi, Kristian, Chelsy, Gilang, Eka, Gazha, Dian, Adelita Marcia and Kim
who have givenhappiness and many good memories during my college life
that will never be forgotten.
5. All my friends in campus,marketing squad 2014 and volley squad which I
cannot mention one by one, thank you for all the corporation and help during
my college life.
iv
TABLE OF CONTENT
PANEL OF EXAMINERS ...........................................................................................i
APPROVAL SHEET ....................................................................................................i
DECLARATION OF ...................................................................................................ii
ORIGINALITY ........................................................................................................... ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ...........................................................................................iii
TABLE OF CONTENT ...............................................................................................iv
LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................vii
LIST OF FIGURES .....................................................................................................x
ABSTRACT ...............................................................................................................xi
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................1
1.1 Background of Study ........................................................................................1
1.2 Problem Identification......................................................................................6
1.3 Statement of Problem .......................................................................................6
1.4 Research Objectives.........................................................................................7
1.5 Significance of Study .......................................................................................7
1.6 Scope and Limitation.......................................................................................8
1.7 Organization of the Skripsi ..............................................................................8
1.8 Definition of Terms ..........................................................................................9
CHAPTER IILITERATURE REVIEW.....................................................................11
2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................11
2.2 Theoretical Review........................................................................................11
2.2.1 MLM Company ......................................................................................11
2.2.1.1 MLM Company and Career Option Relationship ..........................12
2.2.2Service ....................................................................................................13
2.2.2.1 Service and CareerOption Relationship .........................................14
2.2.3Reward Scheme ......................................................................................15
2.2.3.1Reward Scheme and Career Option Relationship ..........................16
2.2.4 Trust ....................................................................................................... 17
2.2.4.1Trust and Career Option Relationship ............................................18
2.2.5 Agent ......................................................................................................19
v
2.2.5.1Agent and Career Option Relationship ...........................................20
2.2.6 Career Option .........................................................................................21
2.3 Previous Research..........................................................................................22
2.4 Hypothesis ..................................................................................................... 25
2.5Operational Definition of Variable................................................................26
2.5.1 MLM Company (X1) .............................................................................26
2.5.2Agent Attributes (X2) .............................................................................28
2.5.3Career Option (Y) ...................................................................................29
2.6 Research Gap .................................................................................................30
CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHODOLOGY........................................................31
3.1 ResearchFramework ......................................................................................31
3.2 ResearchDesign.............................................................................................31
3.3 Sampling Design.............................................................................................32
3.3.1 Population .............................................................................................. 32
3.3.2 Sample ....................................................................................................32
3.4 Research Instrument .......................................................................................33
3.4.1 Primary Data ...........................................................................................33
3.4.2 Secondary Data .......................................................................................35
3.5Validity and Reliability ..................................................................................35
3.5.1Validity...................................................................................................35
3.5.2Reliability...............................................................................................37
3.6 Data Gathering Procedure..............................................................................38
3.7 Testing the Hypothesis..........................................................................................39
3.7.1 Structural Equation Modeling Analysis.................................................40
CHAPTER IV DATA ANALYSIS ............................................................................43
4.1 Company Profile ............................................................................................43
4.2Respondent Profile .........................................................................................44
4.2.1 Gender ....................................................................................................44
4.2.2Age .........................................................................................................44
4.2.3Occupation ............................................................................................. 45
4.2.4Latest Education .....................................................................................46
4.2.5Monthly Income .....................................................................................46
vi
4.3 Validity Test .................................................................................................. 47
4.3.1 KMO-MSA Barlett‟s Test ..................................................................... 48
4.3.2Communalities .......................................................................................49
4.3.3Total Variance Explained .......................................................................50
4.3.4Construct Validity Test..........................................................................50
4.3.4.1Discriminant Validity .....................................................................50
4.3.4.1Convergent Validity .......................................................................51
4.4Reliability Test ...............................................................................................52
4.5Descriptive Analysis ......................................................................................53
4.5.1Company Variable Description ..............................................................53
4.5.2Service Variable Description ..................................................................55
4.5.3Reward Scheme Variable Description ...................................................56
4.5.4Trust Variable Description .....................................................................57
4.5.5Career Option Variable Description .......................................................58
4.6Overview of Career Option Based on Demographic Respondent.................60
4.6.1Career Option Variable Based on Gender ..............................................60
4.6.2Career Option Variable Based on Age ...................................................60
4.6.3Career Option Variable Based on Occupation .......................................61
4.6.4Career Option Variable Based on Education .........................................63
4.6.5Career Option Variable Based on Monthly Income ...............................64
4.6.6 Career Option Based on Demographic...................................................65
4.7 Structural Equation Model (SEM) Analysis ..................................................66
4.7.1Hypotheses Testing ................................................................................69
4.7.1.1Influence of Company toward Career Option ................................69
4.7.1.2Service towards Career Option .......................................................69
4.7.1.3Reward Scheme towards Career Option..........................................70
4.7.1.4 Trust towards Career Option ..........................................................70
CHAPTER VCONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................73
5.1 Conclusion..................................................................................................... 73
5.2 Recommendations..........................................................................................74
5.2.1 For Paytren Company .............................................................................74
5.2.2 For Future Researcher ............................................................................74
vii
REFERENCES........................................................................................................... 75
APPENDIX .................................................................................................................87
Appendix A – Questionnaire Form .............................................................................87
Appendix B – Raw Data..............................................................................................97
Appendix C – Amos Result .......................................................................................106
viii
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.1 Comparison of Growth MLM Sales in South East Asia ...............................2
Table 1.2Data of Paytren Member in 2017..................................................................5
Table 2.1Operational Definition of X1 ......................................................................26
Table 2.2Operational Definition of X2 ......................................................................28
Table 2.3Operational Definition of Y ........................................................................29
Table 3.1Likert Scale.................................................................................................34
Table 3.2Likert Scale Questionnaire ..........................................................................34
Table 3.3 Tools for Measuring Model Fit...................................................................40
Table 3.4 Goodness Fit Index Value ...........................................................................41
Table 4.1 Rotated Component Matrix.........................................................................46
Table 4.2 KMO-MSA Barlett‟s Test...........................................................................47
Table 4.3 Communalities............................................................................................48
Table 4.4 Total Variance Explained............................................................................49
Table 4.5 Correlation matrix.......................................................................................49
Table 4.6 Rotated Component Matrix.........................................................................50
Table 4.7 Reliability Test............................................................................................51
Table 4.8 Frequency Distribution of Company Variable ............................................53
Table 4.9 Frequency Distribution of Service Variable...............................................54
Table 4.10 Frequency Distribution of Reward Scheme Variable...............................55
Table 4.11 Frequency Distribution of Trust Variable.................................................58
Table 4.12 Frequency Distribution of Career Option Variable...................................59
Table 4.13 Career Option Based on Gender................................................................60
Table 4.14 Career Option Based on Age.....................................................................60
Table 4.15 Career Option Based on Occupation..........................................................61
Table 4.16 Career Option Based on Education............................................................63
Table 4.17 Career Option Based on Monthly Income.................................................64
Table 4.18 Career Option Based on Demographic......................................................65
Table 4.19 Evaluation Fit Indexes Structural Model...................................................67
Table 4.20 Regression Weight.....................................................................................68
Table 4.21 Standardized Regression Weight...............................................................68
Table 4.22 Squared Multiple Correlation....................................................................69
Table 4.23 Influence of Company towards Career Option..........................................70
ix
Table 4.24 Influence of Service towards Career Option..............................................70
Table 4.25 Influence of Reward scheme toward Career Option..................................71
Table 4.26 Influence of Trust toward Career Option...................................................72
x
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1.1 Graphic of Paytren members in 2017 ..........................................................4
Figure 2.2Theoretical Framework..............................................................................25
Figure 4.1 Gender of Respondents..............................................................................44
Figure 4.2Age of Respondents...................................................................................44
Figure 4.3Occupation of Respondents.......................................................................45
Figure 4.4Latest Education of Respondents...............................................................46
Figure 4.5Monthly Income of Respondents ...............................................................46
Figure 4.6 Frequency Distribution of Company Variable ...........................................54
Figure 4.7 Frequency Distribution of Service Variable ..............................................55
Figure 4.8 Frequency Distribution of Reward Scheme Variable ................................56
Figure 4.9 Frequency Distribution of Trust Variable ..................................................57
Figure 4.10 Frequency Distribution of Career Option Variable .................................59
Figure 4.11 Full Structural Model................................................................................66
xi
ABSTRACT
The concept of Multilevel Marketing or referral marketing is a method of product
distribution. The distributors are given an opportunity to introduce other distributors
to the business. This study is conducted to analyze one of MLM companies in
Indonesia which is PT. Veritra Sentosa Internasional. This company is a multilevel
marketing company that has been running in the business since 2014. The product of
this company namely Paytren. The fluctuation of the members happened in the
company because of the Paytren payment system was detained by Bank Indonesia and
make the company decide to change the MLM system. The purpose of this study is to
analyze the influence of MLM Companies and Agent attributes on the willingness to
undertake MLM as a Career Option. The study is using factor analysis and structural
equation modeling by distributing the questionnaires to 250 Paytren members. This
study adopted theoretical framework from previous research by Nga and Mun (2011)
which in six variables namely company, service, reward scheme, agent, trust and
career option. The result of this study found that service has the highest influence
towards career and followed by trust variable, reward scheme and company which has
the lowest value and indicates not significant with career option.
Keywords: Company, Service, Reward Scheme, Agent, Trust Career Option
1
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of Study
Fundamental changes during the past century have had a staggering effect on
every aspect of human life (Rezvani, Ghahraman and Hadadi 2017). Early in the
twentieth century, direct selling bridged the selling tradition of the itinerant
peddler into a new era (Keep & Nat, 2014).Multilevel Marketing (MLM) is
gaining much attention in business circles recently (Koroth & Sarada,
2012).Multilevel marketing is a way of distributing products or services in which
distributors earn income from their own retail sales made by other direct and
indirect recruits, that is, people they have recruited to sell, and people their
recruits have recruited, into the direct selling organization as distributor (Albaum
& Peterson, 2011). It is often described as direct selling or network marketing
(Nga & Mun, 2011).
Network marketing (NM) is a modernized way of selling products, depending on
social relations and networks of people who advertise for the product using word-
of-mouth marketing (Pedrod, Ahmadi & Charafedd, 2008) . Network marketing is
the most common form of direct selling (Tyre, Myrex, Lazo & Waters, 2016).In a
direct selling situation, a salesperson has to develop trust with consumers during
their interpersonal interaction in order to have better sales and develop long-term
relationships (Poon, Albaum & Chan, 2012).Multilevel marketing plans usually
promise to pay commissions through two or more levels of recruits known as
distributor‟s “downlines” (Attri & Chaturvedi, 2011). The more the downlines
there are corresponding to each upline, the more the chains, and the more these
networks can expect to grow, locally, nationally, and internationally (Luca, 2011).
The big draw card in MultiLevel Marketing is the commission paid not only for
direct sales made by the salesperson but also from the sales made by those
recruited by the salesperson. (Chaudhari & Mistry, 2010). MLM is certainly a big
2
business in the United States, Canada and around the world involving millions of
individuals direct selling MLM members (Epstein, 2010). Despite criticism of
network marketing distribution system, others believe this to be the best system
of the twenty-first century and therefore it deserves appropriate attention,
respect and credibility (Salciuviene, Reardon & Auruskeviciene, 2011).
Moreover, based on Spire Research & Consultant Ltd (2011) states that Asia
registered USD 37 billion in MLM product sales in 2007, and is now the world‟s
biggest region for multi-level marketing. Trailing behind are North America
(USD 32 billion including Canada), Europe, Africa and the Middle East (USD 27
billion), Central America, Southern America and the Caribbean (USD 17 billion),
and Australia and the Pacific (USD1.4 billion)
According to Kontan.co.id (2012) direct sales business or often called multilevel
marketing (MLM) has been widely implemented in Indonesia. This year,
Chairman of the Indonesian Direct Sales Association (APLI) Helmy Attamimi
projected its turnover to grow to 10% . MLM business growth averaged 5% -10%
per year, where the transaction value in 2009 reached Rp 7.6 trillion. Moreover,
based on the research of Wongsurawat and Hatchaleelaha (2016) states that
Indonesia is in the 3rd
position of MLM growth in South East Asia.
Table 1.1 Comparison of Growth MLM Sales in South East Asia
Source: (Wongsurawat &Hatchaleelaha, 2016)
Based on Tyre, Myrex, Lazo and Waters (2016) states that network marketing
started in the United States and spread globally. The globalization of network
3
marketing has driven a new interest in empirical research on effectiveness,
perception, legality, and economic impact the business model has on established
and emerging economies. Furthermore Merdeka.com (2016) states that as a
country in the largest population category in the world, Indonesia becomes a big
business opportunity for an entrepreneurs of multilevel marketing (MLM). This
one business is believed to continue to survive in various economic situations
amid technological advances.
(Kompas.com, 2009) The supporting factor of why MLM could survive in
Indonesia is the increasing number of unemployed in Indonesia, MLM business
can be a solution because it is able to create widespread employment
opportunities. Republika.co.id (2017) states that not a few people who have a
negative perception for this business model in Indonesia. This negative image is
not only due to the bad management of MLM companies, but also the individuals
of these businesses. Kompas.com (2014) Paytren MLM was inaugurated under
PT Veritra Sentosa International on 22nd
August 2013. This business is growing
by looking for new partners or members. A number of partners claim to feel the
benefits of this business. Furthermore, based on Kompas.com (2014) also stated
that one of the paytren‟s member did not make this business as their main job
because the electronic payment system is often stuck.
According to detik.com (2017) Paytren MLM was detained by the Indonesian
Bank at the end of September 2017. Yusuf Mansyur as the president
commissioner of Paytren said that the suspension was done because it does not
have permission from Bank Indonesia. Based on Detik.com (2017) The President
Director, Hari Prabowo stated that at this time, the company only waiting for the
permission from Indonesian Bank. Hari Prabowo estimates the permission will
come out in January 2018. And since then, Paytren application can not be used for
top up deposit.
Based on the data given from PT. Veritra Sentosa Internasional, the member of
Paytren has decrease on September 2017 until December 2017. The drastic
4
decline was happened on October 2017 until December 2017 together with the
suspension from the Indonesian Bank.This is certainly very detrimental for the
paytren and for members who have joined because it is difficult to get a new
member. The manager of PT. Veritra Sentosa Internasional said that this decrease
causes Paytren to change the membership system where member who has become
a leader is required to keep prospects and help the downline. And if the leader
does not help his downline then it will be disabled by the Paytren. This is done to
make Paytren members can be more focused on doing Paytren MLM business and
make this business as their career. So, for the member who have main job beside
the Paytren MLM should choose whether they want to focus to develop their
career in Paytren MLM or they want to stop it. This new system makes all the
members in Paytren MLM did not get passive income which the other MLM
offered. Since the owner is one of the Islamic influencer in Indonesia, the business
is should be halal and fair. The member gets the commission based on their work
and effort to prospect new members.
Figure 1.1 Graphic of New Recruitment of Paytren members in 2017
Source: PT. Veritra Sentosa Internasional, 2017
5
Table 1.2 Data of New Recruitment of Paytren Member in 2017
Year Month Total Member
2017 1 39596
2017 2 57183
2017 3 101254
2017 4 85869
2017 5 95126
2017 6 92401
2017 7 92597
2017 8 94854
2017 9 89773
2017 10 41854
2017 11 27586
2017 12 22662
Source: PT. Veritra Sentosa Internasional, 2017
Based on previous research (Nga & Mun, 2011) with the title “influence of MLM
and agent attributes on the willingness to undertake multilevel marketing as a
career option among youth” analyze about the general MLM and the effect for
career option among generation Y who join MLM in Malaysia. The result of the
previous research stated that reward scheme did not influence the willingness to
undertake MLM as a career option. There may be skepticism in the schemes due
to the misconception created by pyramid schemes. Furthermore, Nga and Mun
(2011) stated that perhaps MLM companies need to better communicate and
educate agents on the viability and sustainability of the earning potential in reward
schemes.
According to the previous research of Nga & Mun (2011) the researcher wants to
analyze the influence of Paytren MLM and agent attributes for career option
among members of Paytren. Researchers suspect there are existence of variables
6
that affect Paytren‟s member in choosing MLM as their career. The researcher
identified the independent variables and dependent variables based on research by
Nga & Mun (2011). The independent variable namely the MLM company,
service, reward schemes, agent, and trust on MLM companies. The dependent
variable of this study is the willingness to undertake MLM as a career option. The
researcher wishes to conduct research with the title "TheInfluence of Paytren
MLM and Agent Attributes on the Willingness to Undertake Multilevel
Marketing as a Career Option”.
1.2 Problem Identification
Based on data obtained from PT. Veritra Sentosa Internasional, there are a
decreasing number of members who join in Paytren on October 2017 until
December 2017 because of the electronic payment got detained by the Indonesian
Bank. The decreasing members from September to October was 47,919, from
October to November is 14,268 and from November to December is 4,924. This
decline is very significant and together with the suspension from Bank Indonesia.
The fact that almost 46% decreasing happened on September 2017 to October
2017, 32% on October 2017 to November 2017 and 17% on November 2017 to
December 2017.
1.3 Statement of Problem
From the background, the researcher finds out some questions that are needed to
be answered based on the analysis of this research. They are:
RQ1. Dothe MLM company has an influence on the willingness to take up MLM
as a career option?
RQ2. Do the service has an influence on the willingness to take up MLM as a
career option?
RQ3. Do the reward schemes has an influence on the willingness to take up MLM
as a career option?
RQ4. Do the MLM Agent has an influence on the willingness to take up MLM as
a career option?
7
RQ5. Do the MLM trust has an influence on the willingness to take up MLM as a
career option?
RQ6. Do demographic variables (gender, age, education, occupation) influence
the willingness to take up MLM as a career option?
1.4 Research Objectives
This objective of the research is to analyze the influence of service, reward
schemes, company and agent characteristics, as well as trust on MLM companies
on willingness to undertake multilevel marketing as a career option. Specifically,
the objectives of the research are:
1. To analyze the influence of MLM company in Paytren MLM to
undertake multilevel marketing as a career option.
2. To analyze the service in Paytren MLM to undertake multilevel
marketing as a career option
3. To analyze the influence of reward scheme on the willingness to
undertake multilevel marketing as a career option.
4. To analyze the influence of trust to undertake multilevel marketing as
a career option
5. To analyze the trust of Paytren agent to undertake multilevel
marketing as a career option.
6. To analyze the demographic variable to undertake multilevel
marketing as a career option.
1.5 Significance of Study
1. Researcher
In order to fulfill the requirements to achieve bachelor‟s degree from President
University, this research obviously gives a huge contribution to the researcher.
Along this several months to spend time working on this research using theories
that have been learned during university study for years and from other resources
to support my research. Also, it gives me a cache to obtain more knowledge about
8
my research such as the important MLM company, service, reward scheme, trust
agent, and demographic variable towards career that hopefully can be used as an
asset to other researcher in the future.
2. For Paytren
From this research, the company could know, realize and make an evaluation for
their business development in the future.
2. For Future researcher
Through this study, the future researcher will be able to learn about Multilevel
Marketing and the role of agent attributes in MLM company and also to improve
this research in writing better paper as comparative study.
1.6 Scope and Limitation
Scope
The research study is conducted to analyze the influence of Paytren MLM and
agent attributes on the willingness to undertake multilevel marketing as a career
option.
Limitation
This research is going to take sample for business agents of Paytren MLM. The
researcher is using factor analysis and structural equation modeling (to be
explained in chapter 3) to take sample. This research will be conducted by online
questionnaire that will be given to 250 leaders in Paytren MLM. This study
focuses on the influence of Paytren MLM and agent attributes on the willingness
to undertake multilevel marketing as a career option.
1.7 Organization of the Skripsi
These followings explanation are how the research organized:
1. Chapter I – Introduction / Background
This chapter presents the research foundation including background,
formulation of problems, the aims of research, scope and limitation of
9
research, and its organization paper. The keys of comprehending this
research are provided in this chapter.
2. Chapter II – Literature Review
This chapter presents the result of researchers on the theories such as
definition, previous research, theoretical framework, and hypothesis and
research gaps.
3. Chapter III – Research Methodology
How to do the research the data are explained here. In this session, there
would be research framework, research method, data instrument, samples,
statistical treatment, and data analysis.
4. Chapter IV – Results and Discussions
It is the spirit of the papers. The findings display all results of data
analysis. The research questions meet the answers in this chapter. To
make it clearer for the readers, the researcher conveys the discussions of
the findings.
5. Chapter V – Conclusion & Recommendation
This chapter is the end of the paper that result from chapter four and
opinion form the researcher.
1.8 Definition of Terms
1. MLM Company
MLM companies is kind of company which continuously striving to
educate, communicate and deliver value to the customer. They need to be
committed in reinforcing their brand character and a company culture that
nurtures customer loyalty. MLM companies need to continuously uphold
high ethical practices and integrity in marketing and in social
responsibility(Nga & Mun, 2011).
10
2. Reward Scheme
The compensation that given by the MLM companies to their distributor
based on legal pyramid scheme(Muncy, 2004).
3. Service
It is referring to customer's satisfaction when they need is matches their
expectations and create the quality of specific levels of value so that
customers remain engaged positively with the companies (Lu, Berchoux,
Marek & Chen, 2015).
4. Trust
It is associated with a partner‟s reliability, integrity, and competence.
Trusted partner reduces the risks associated with relational
exchange(Constantin, 2009).
5. Agents
Agents are entrepreneurs cum sales representatives and treated as both
customers and partners of an integrated sales cum social network and
being an individual with passion, integrity, empathy, capacity to be a good
listener and communicator are critical in relationship marketing (Nga &
Mun, 2011).
6. Career
It is the sum total of paid and unpaid work, learning and life roles you
undertake throughout your life. The term 'career' was traditionally
associated with paid employment and referred to a single occupation
(Zaidi & Iqbal, 2012).
11
CHAPTER II
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction
This chapter is introducing to deliver the review of literature which is relevant to
this research and to provide the foundation of theoretical review. The first part
begins with a review of dependent variable and after that followed by review of
independent variables. The possible association between dependent and
independent variables and finally summarize the gaps of research.
2.2 Theoretical Review
2.2.1 MLM Company
Based on Franco and Perez (2016) stated that MLM companies have no barriers to
expand their selling network as they accept independent and casual consultants
regardless of education level, work availability, age, experience, socio-economic
status, or gender. According to Girish and Dipa (2015) this business uses
independent representatives to sell products or services to family, friends, and
acquaintances. It is a business strategy, which involves participants at various
levels, the level above getting returns through the perpetuation of the business at
the levels below it.
Makni (2014) argues that companies which distribute their products through the
method of direct sales and network marketing have the rule not to use advertising
as a means of promotion, since instead of it they pay a commission to their
independent representatives who also do live advertising by word of mouth.
Moreover, according to Tyre, Myer, Lazo and Water (2016) the company
developed network marketing to reduce the cost of labor, advertising, and
marketing.
Other research by Kiyosaki (2007) stated that the financial freedom offered by
MLM companies to the average person and as the distributor or agent are not
12
contractual employees, the company will not terminate them even if they fail to
achieve the envisioned target since they are responsible for their own income or
incentives. And based on Lee, Lau and Loi (2016) it is very important for MLM
companies to engage their distributors in ways that can satisfy them so that they
will work harder to achieve the firms‟ objectives. Furthermore, Tyre, Myer, lazo
and Waters (2016)stated that network marketers start out with a company because
the network marketer believes in the products, organization, or the business
model.
According to research by Yen, Liang and Chieh (2008) states that for a successful
direct seller, in addition to treating himself/herself as part of the business body to
accurately reflect company image and concept, it is more important to clarify and
satisfy real customer‟s need through sincere and objective mind. This is also the
most important spirit of Direct Selling and is the reason why an excellent Direct
Selling company stays strongly in the market.
2.2.2.1 MLM Company and Career Option Relationship
According to Handoko (2008) suggests that career is an effort by the employees
personally to achieve a career plan in a company. Based on Rivai and Sagala
(2009) career is the process to improving the individual work capabilities that
employees achieved in order to achieve the desired career. Furthermore, Gorda,
Lestari and Astawa (2016) states that the better of someone‟s career in the
organizational then the organizational or the company is also better.
Based on research by Alniacik, Ekcin and Erat (2012) states that the company
should have highly skilled and motivated their loyal employee who are committed
and planning a long run career in order to make them stay in a company.
Furthermore, states that the companies which not capable to satisfy the employee
may make the employee‟s wish to leave their career.
Other research by Nga and Mun (2011) states that company has an influence of
someone choosing their career option. MLM companies can enhance these
13
attributes by continuously striving to educate, communicate and deliver value to
the customer. They need to be committed in reinforcing their brand character and
a company culture that nurtures customer loyalty. MLM companies need to
continuously uphold high ethical practices and integrity in marketing and in social
responsibility.
2.2.2 Service
According to Gregor and Wadlewski (2013) states that service is one of the tools
in multilevel marketing that makes the pyramid and multilevel marketing become
legal or illegal. Furthermore, Guenzi, Luca and Spiro (2016) states that service is
the important aspect to satisfy the need of customer and create specific
knowledge. Moreover, Hatchaleelaha and Wongsurawat (2016) states that in
MLM structure, delivering a service through various level of independent agent is
should at the forefront. Selling a product or service in MLM network can develop
a hierarchical tree structure by recruiting a minimum of two downline members.
Other research by Farrahmandian, Minavand and Afshardost (2013) states that
generally, in a competitive environment it is vital for service company to have a
proper understanding of determinants and backgrounds of consumer‟s satisfaction
as to have an extremely high monetary value. Furthermore, Ilias, Rahman and
Razak (2009) states that service is a definition of quality and has to be judged on
the assessment of the consumer. Moreover, Lee, Lau and Loi (2016) states that the
products and services of a company represent the corporate identity and
reputation.
Based on research by Yen, Liang and Chieh (2008) states that the product or
service in MLM company sold directly to the customer through the use of face to
face way or personal contact. Moreover, Herbig and Yelkur (2008) states that
direct marketing or multilevel marketing is defined as a sale of product or service
directly to the customer. Furthermore, research by Franco and Perez (2016) states
that delivering a service to the customer can earn income and generate a
percentage of the sales executed by the people they recruit for the company.
14
According Okeke and Nwankpa (2017) states that supplying a service in MLM is
through various levels of independent agents such as contractor, distributor and
etc. Furthermore, Vahidi (2016) states that it is simply a network of independent
sales representatives that sell products and services from the supplier (or
manufacturer) directly to the end-user (or consumer).
Lee, Lau and Loi (2016) argues that training program is one of the service that
MLM companies give to improve the skill and knowledge of the agents or
distributors in convincing the target market to join their multilevel marketing.
Furthermore, Girish and Dipa (2015) states that the target market for multilevel
marketing is start from family, friends and acquaintances by verbally supporting
them, and recommend that they use the products.
2.2.2.1 Service and Career Option Relationship
Based on research by Alniacik, Ekcin and Erat (2012) states that satisfaction
towards service is affected in someone choosing career. According, Odunayo,
Ayodeji and Olaniyi (2014) states that services are delivered to meet human needs
and it will affect of behavioral of the employees towards their career and their
organization. Furthermore, Fejoh and Faniran (2016) states that training is one of
the service that companies give to improve the career and enhance to get better
position in the company.
According to research by Lu, Berchoux, Marek and Chen (2015) states that
customers are satisfied when they get what they want and whenall the services
they need and matches their expectations. Satisfactionmeans providing goods and
services that create specific levels of value for the customerso that the customers
remain engaged positively with the companies. Furthermore, Dado, Petrovicova,
Riznic and Rajic (2013) states that the quality of service revealed significant
influence of corporate image and perceived value on customers behavioral
intentions.
15
Other research by Nazeer, Zahid and Azeem (2014) states that satisfaction,
retention, loyalty, growth and profit is linked with the service quality of the
companies which will affect the career option. Furthermore, Nga and Mun (2011)
states that there is a relationship between service of the companies and someone‟s
in choosing their career. MLM services include providing sound technical advice,
easy access to distributors, high-quality products and incorporating customer
feedback for improvement. MLM companies need to uphold their positive
attributes and commitment towards service and training to remain the employer of
choice to reinforce their creditability as a sustainable employer of choice.
2.2.3 Reward Scheme
According to Keep and Nat (2014) a pyramid or reward scheme may seek to hide
its real nature (essentially, a chain letter) by introducing a product or service to
fool people into thinking that they are engaged in a business or income
opportunity. Furthermore, Vahidi (2016) states that the members of a pyramid
receive commission only by adding some other members to their team without
selling any product or service, while in network marketing, the active customers
are actually independent distributors which receive commission from the profit
gained by more sales.
Based on research by Girish and Dipa (2015) states that MLM companies are
more focus on rewards for recruiting new members rather than selling a product
or service. Moreover, Franco and Perez (2016) in pyramid schemes, a member
makes an investment to receive authorization to recruit others and collect a
commission when those recruit others to join the scheme. Furthermore,
Hatchaleelaha and Wongsurawat (2015) states that the MLM companies give a
reward to members who achieve stated targets to maintain and grow their
networks while contributing to the growth of the company business.
Other Research by Gregor and Wadlewski (2013) states that reward scheme leads
to an unfair situation in which unproductive persons are rewarded to the same
extent as persons who work. Moreover, the system will always be paying higher
16
commissions to persons who are higher until the moment the persons located
lower fill to a greater extent the levels beyond the reach of the
former.Furthermore, Albaum and Peterson (2011) states that the hierarchical
reward system that MLM companies have are encourage the recruitment,
entrepreneurship and also sales.
Figure 2.1 Reward Scheme in Multilevel Marketing
Source: (Albaum & Peterson, 2011)
2.2.3.1 Reward Scheme and Career Option Relationship
According to Trivellas, Kakos, Blanas and Santouridis (2015) states that
successful career may bear such satisfactory benefits or rewards as pay,
professional growth and/or peer recognition that are likely to act as an individual‟s
motivator for job performance. Furthermore, Osibanjo, Oyewunmi and Ojo
(2014) states that rewards play a significant role in keeping the employees
contended and committed and also impact on the organization effectiveness and
efficiency which measures their levels of survival and growth, thus the highly
motivated employees serve as the competitive advantage for any company
because their performance leads an organization to accomplishments of its goals.
Based on research by Gregor and Wadlewski (2013) states that the rewarding in
multilevel marketing system affecting the work, people located in higher level can
get a high reward and that‟s make them loyal to the companies. Furthermore,
17
Hatchaleelaha and Wongsurawat (2015) states that a lack of loyalty excludes such
individuals from being the ideal membership for MLM.
Research by Mayastinasari (2013) states that reward is associated with the
fulfillment of the promise of the organization. It concerns the organization doing
their fulfillment of the promise. More specifically that reward is the desired
consequence which is typically given for general performance rather than being
contingent on specific behaviors. It is not only tangible material but also
intangible non- material. The rewarding of the right to work as a driver motivate
positive performance due to the behavior of others to their career performance.
Furthermore, Mansor, Borhanudin and Yusuf (2012) states that rewards are very
important to ensure that adequate benefits and rewards packages can significantly
increase the motivation of an individual to increase their work performance.
Other research by Nga and Mun (2011) states that MLM companies need to better
communicate and educate agents on the viability and sustainability of the earning
potential in their reward schemes. MLM companies need to make their
performance measures and rewards more transparent and equitable. MLM reward
schemes may be difficult to comprehend, as well as may not provide assurance of
income and job security. The reward schemes offered need to be easily
understood and profitable to the members who intend to take this up as a career
option.
2.2.4 Trust
According to Franco and Perez (2014) the business network and level of
commitment between both parties determines the level relationship profitability as
a result; hence, a high level of trust is needed in order to successfully rely on each
other. Furthermore, research by Rezvani, Ghahraman and Hadadi (2017) states
that by using network marketing method, not only companies no longer need to
spend heavily on advertisements, the potential buyers will also experience a
higher level of trust and security in their shopping behavior by obtaining
information from people around them. Moreover, Guenzi, Luca and Spiro (2016)
18
emphasizes that people learn through experience how much to trust others and
that trust grows when two parties share a variety of experiences.
Based on research by Hatchaleelaha and Wongsurawat (2015) states that in
multilevel marketing business, the company should be focused on attracting new
members to join its MLM network with a clear marketing strategy and at the same
time create confidence and trust among members. Furthermore, research by Tyre,
Myer, lazo and Waters (2016) states that creating trust is imperative to success in
network marketing. The level of trust is a function of the level of expected gain or
loss involved in network marketing.
Other research by Grob and Vriens (2017) states that at MLM, the risk of
misusing trust is higher in comparison with other sales organizations as the
marketing activities take place far more often in situations of trust. Moreover,
research by Constantin (2009) states that trusted partner reduces the risks
associated with relational exchange, because trust is associated with a partner‟s
reliability, integrity, and competence.
Based on Kalra, Kondepudi and Sridharan (2016) states that trust among members
have an influence on the attitude towards the company image. Furthermore,
Pratistha (2017) states that the success of multilevel marketing company depends
on the trust and cooperation among the members. Moreover, Sarwar, Abasi and
Pervaiz (2012) argues that trust is an important variable to enhance the customer
commitment.
2.2.4.1 Trust and Career Option Relationship
According to Hanafi (2016) states that trust in the organization has a negative
effect on the intention turnover. As employee perception about the existence of
program career planning to help members achieve their career goals. In other
words, the higher the trust then their tendency to be leaving the company is
smaller. Furthermore, Meral, Yashoglu and Semercioz (2016) states that trust
19
effect job satisfaction positively and increase new identification in mergers and
also conformity.
Based on Siddiqi and Kharsiing (2015) states that when dissatisfaction with one‟s
job sets in, organizational trust plays a pivotal role, wherein employees with a
strong sense of trust towards their organization, feel more satisfied with their job,
and hence are highly committed to their organization. Furthermore, Poon, Albaum
and Chan (2012) emphasize that in a direct selling situation, a salesperson has to
develop trust with consumers during their interpersonal interaction in order to
have better sales and develop long-term relationships with the customer and with
the MLM companies itself.
Other research by Salciuvine, Reardon and Auruskeviciene (2011) states that trust
is as an important predictor of commitment. Trust and commitment influence
performance mainly because of buyers‟ tendency to work more positively with
trusted sellers resulting in greater commitment. And in MLM companies, the trust
of buyer or customer is important to maintain the career in MLM companies.
Furthermore, Nga and Mun (2011) emphasize that first impressions of the sales
advisor/agent has been found to be passively related to the trust established
whilst the last impressions impacted satisfaction attained by the customer. To this
extent, trust towards the agent is critical in establishing future confidence and
willingness to commit to future exchanges and/or commitments. Trust towards the
exchange partner has been found to be positively correlated with sales growth,
customer retention, return on investment, market share and also career.
2.2.5 Agent
According to Sizovaite and Paschaloudis (2011) states that multi-level marketing
is one direct selling types and describes it as companies recruiting business people
who act as an agent for their products. Moreover, research by Makni (2014) states
that MLM companies using independent agents to defines a strategy and selling
approach of companies to carry out direct sales and structured on many levels in
order to sell the company goods/services to other agents or end users.
20
Furthermore, research by Koroth and Sarada (2012) emphasize that MLM agents
can generate income in two ways. They can earn commissions and retail profits by
selling directly to retail customers, and they can recruit and manage their own
network of sales agents (on whose sales they earn a commission). Those who
undertake this second income generating activity are often called sponsors who
develop a downline of sales agents.
Other research by Kalra, Kondepudi and Sridharan (2016) states that the MLM
agents must have a motivation to sell the product in order for a consumer to have
an opinion and attitude towards Multilevel marketing. Furthermore, Krige (2012)
emphasize that MLM agents create a narrative structure that shape testimonials as
a part of push-push scheme presentation in order to attract the customer.
Based on Elnaz and Hasan (2016) states that MLM agents believe that they own
the business since the commission to the agents are based on performance.
Moreover, Juman and Christopher (2015) states that the agents commission
includes a percentage of sales to the entire sales group that the agents recruited as
well as earning on any direct sales to retail customers. Furthermore, research by
Vahidi (2016) emphasize that in typical networking model, an agent essentially
contracts or act like a franchisee to the parent company and are paid a commission
based on the volume of product or services that are sold as a result of their own
organization's efforts.
According to research by Bobalca and Soponaru (2015) the agents have the ability
to generate trust and fulfill special requests of the customer. Furthermore, Keep
and Nat (2014) states that the ability of high volume agents to generate and sell
business support materials at a profit to downline distributors further obscures the
path to financial success. High annual agents‟ turnover creates a ready market for
fee-based training programs offered by upline agent.
21
2.2.5.1 MLM Agent and Career Option Relationship
According to Gorda, Lestari and Astawa (2016) states that the employee
performance has positive influence in career, it is indicating that the better
employee performance the better of the career. Furthermore, Zaidi and Iqbal
(2012) emphasize that the personality of the employee (agent) will affect
someone‟s in choosing career because a career which is in line with the
personality can make work without any extra effort.
Other research by Lee and Loi (2016) states that distributors are direct selling
agents who function as the frontline sales force of a MLM company. A MLM
company is unable terminate them even if they fail to reach the envisioned.
Hence, it is crucial for MLM firms to understand the motivators for distributors to
meet the company objectives and to make them stay in MLM companies.
Furthermore, Franco and Perez (2016) states that companies encourage their
distributors to recruit others from their social and family networks. Thus, they
encourage members to bring their family into the business physically or
psychologically. In the same manner, the companies build a system of family by
developing family like bonds between current distributors and new members. The
business network and relationship is crucial between the MLM and its
independent distributor to maintain their pyramid and keep running the business.
Other research by Koroth (2014) states that this worldwide growth in direct sales
both as a selling system and as a career opportunity. Moreover, Nga and Mun
(2011) in their research states that MLM relies on the agent attributes such as
enthusiasm, empathy, positive attitude, communication, passion and ethical
orientation. In essence, MLM agents need to exhibit positive cooperative
motivations and extend of clients/customers above self-interest and sales.
MLM agents need to be encouraged to reflect on their personal selling
experiences and share them with their peers to enhance their tacit knowledge in
MLM career.
22
2.2.6 Career Option (Y)
Based on Kayalar and Ozmutaf (2009) career is the idea of an occupation chosen
as the means of one‟s progress through life. According to research by Koroth
(2014) direct sales has growth in despite this worldwide both as a selling system
and as a career opportunity. Moreover, Hiranpong, Decharin and
Thawesaengskulthai (2016) argues that the network marketers who experience
high levels of success in their career are more highly motivated in multilevel
marketing. Furthermore, Tyre, Myer, Lazo and Waters (2016) emphasize that
network marketers view the multilevel marketing business not only as a career for
them but as a way of life.
Other research by Lee and Loi (2016) argues that the MLM leader will create a
vision that strategically linked into career objectives and organizational goals as
process of sense making process. Moreover, Keep and Nat (2014) states that the
MLM companies convince the customer in giving them a high commission if they
make the MLM as their full-time career option. Furthermore, Coughlan (2012)
states that there are many sales agents of multilevel marketing who are satisfied
with the commission from their company and make it as a fulltime career.
According to Franco and Perez (2016) states that young people more tend to
choose multilevel marketing as their career option to supplement their income.
Furthermore, Albaum and Peterson (2011) emphasize that some of direct sellers
in multilevel marketing companies make themselves as the career seller who use
MLM as their major source of income. Moreover, research by Beasley (2012)
states that members in multilevel marketing join primarily is for additional
income or chance to be successful.
2.3 Previous Research
Author 1. Joyce Koe Hwee Nga
2. Soo Wai Mun (Nadiah Soo)
(Nga & Mun, 2011)
23
Journal Title The influence of MLM companies and agent attributes on the
willingness to undertake multilevel marketing as a careeroption
among youth.
Purpose With the real wages in Malaysia decreasing and increasing
unemployment especially among fresh graduates there may be a
greater incentive to explore multilevel marketing (MLM) to
supplement their income and maintain their desired modern
lifestyle. However, the perception of MLM has in the past been
tainted by unscrupulous pyramid and Ponzi schemes which aims
at quick profits and are not sustainable. This paper aims to
investigate the influence of perception of MLM companies and
agent attributes on the willingness to undertake MLM as a career
among youth.
Variable 1. Company
2. Service
3. Reward Scheme
4. Trust
5. Agent
6. Career
Result MLM company, service and agent attributes have been found
to influence the willingness to pursue MLM as a career
option among youth. In line with the rising cost of living,
the implication of this study is that youth do consider
MLM as a viable opportunity to supplement income and
potential career option. In terms of demographics, only
the perception of family income level has an influence on
the willingness to undertake MLM as a career option. As
such, to better equip youth for their career in MLM, more
relevant, active and engaging teaching and learning
experiences need to be incorporated in the business
education curriculum. Greater emphasis needs to be
24
placed on entrepreneurship education to train students to
be more independent and innovative in their outlook.
MLM companies need to uphold their positive attributes
and commitment towards service and training to remain
the employer of choice to reinforce their creditability as a
sustainable employer of choice. This study also presents
MLM companies with an opportunity to nurture and
capitalize on the pool of young, willing and capable
young people for the positive future growth of the
industry.
Author 1. Arngrim Hunnes
2. Ola Kvaloy
3. Klaus Mohn
(Hunnes, Kvaloy & Mohn, 2011)
Journal Title Performance appraisal and career opportunities: A case study
Purpose gives a brief overview of the processes of performance
appraisal in the company which forms the subject of our case
study. The data set is presented and variables are defined and
discussed. An econometric model is outlined and estimated in,
with subsequent discussion of key results.
Variable 1. Performance
2. Change capability
3. Expertise
4. Trust
5. Health, safety and
environmental issue
6. Career
Result Dimensions of expertise (EXPT) and trust (TRID) also exert a
clearly positive influence on perceived career. Performance
variable, is not supportive for career opportunities. And HSE-
oriented work environment is negative for the content with
performance appraisal systems at least for employees.
25
Author 1. Abdul Assis Koroth
(Koroth, 2014)
Journal Title Antecedents of distributor turnover in multilevel marketing
Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the antecedents of
channel performance in a multi-level marketing (MLM) channel.
Variable 1. Met expectation
2. Job Satisfaction
3. Turnover intention
4. Public Image
Result From the foregoing analysis, it is concluded that there is a
positive relation between met expectations and job satisfaction in
MLM business. The study shows that the expectations of many
MLM distributors still remain as a dream and hence they were
not satisfied with their present distributorship. Consequently,
many distributors were seriously thinking of quitting the industry
in the near future.
Figure 2.2 Theoretical Framework
Adopted from Nga and Mun, (2011)
26
2.4 Hypothesis
H1. The perception of Paytren MLM company will have an influence on the
willingness to take MLM as a career option ( CAREER).
H2. The perception of Paytren MLM company service will have an influence on
the willingness to take up MLM as a career option (CAREER).
H3. The perception of Paytren MLM company reward schemewill have an
influence on the willingness to take up MLM as a career option (CAREER).
H4. The trust towards MLM agents will have an influence on the willingness to
take up MLM as a career option (CAREER).
H5. The perception towards MLM agents will have an influence on the
willingness to take MLM as a career option (CAREER).
2.5 Operational Definition of Variable
2.5.1 MLM Company (X1)
Table 2.1 Operational Definition of X1
Com
pan
y (
X1)
Definition Indicators Statements
MLM companies is kind of
company which continuously
striving to educate,
communicate and deliver
value to the customer. They
need to be committed in
reinforcing their brand
character and a company
culture that nurtures
customer loyalty. MLM
companies need to
continuously uphold high
ethical practices and integrity
1. Brand Image
2. Reputation
3. Legal
4. Ethical
5. Stable
(Nga & Mun,
2011)
1. Paytren company have a
name.
2. Paytren Company have
been in business for a
long time.
3. Paytren company are
reputable.
4. Paytren company have a
legal operating scheme.
5. Paytren company are
ethical in their
operation.
6. Paytren company are
27
in marketing and in social
responsibility
(Nga & Mun, 2011)
operationally stable.
(Nga & Mun, 2011)
Servic
e (
X1
)
Service is referring to
customer's satisfaction when
they need is matches their
expectations and create the
quality of specific levels of
value so that customers
remain engaged positively
with the companies.
(Lu, Berchoux, Marek &
Chen, 2015)
1. Need
2. Advice
3. Quality
(Nga & Mun,
2011)
1. Paytren Company
consider the
customers long-term
needs.
2. Paytren company
provides adequate
technical advice on
the product.
3. Paytren company
provides easy access
to the product.
4. Paytren company
products are high
quality.
(Nga & Mun, 2011)
Rew
ard
Sch
em
e (X
1)
Reward scheme is the
compensation that given by
the MLM companies to their
distributor based on legal
pyramid scheme.
(Muncy, 2004)
1. Legal
2. Scheme
(Nga & Mun,
2011)
1. Paytren MLM schemes
are legal.
2. Paytren MLM scheme
provides fair compensation
to their sales agents.
3. Paytren MLM schemes
reward sales agents at the
top the most
(Nga & Mun, 2011)
28
2.5.2 Agent Attributes (X2)
Table 2.2 Operational Definition of X2
Definition Indicators Statements
Agen
t (X
2)
Agents of MLM companies are
entrepreneurs cum sales
representatives and treated as
both customers and partners of
an integrated sales cum social
network and being an individual
with passion, integrity, empathy,
capacity to be a good listener
and communicator are critical in
relationship marketing.
(Nga & Mun, 2011)
1. Enthusiastic
2. Persuasive
3. Persistent
(Nga & Mun,
2011)
1. Paytren agents are
enthusiastic
2. Paytren agents are
persuasive
3. Paytren agents are
persistent
(Nga & Mun, 2011)
Tru
st (
X2)
Trust is associated with a
partner‟s reliability, integrity,
and competence. Trusted partner
reduces the risks associated with
relational exchange.
(Constantin, 2009)
1. Friend
2. Integrity
(Nga & Mun,
2011)
1. The sales agent is a
friend of mine .
2. The sales agent is
introduced by a
friend of mine
3. The sales agent of
Paytren MLM
displays integrity
(Nga & Mun, 2011)
29
2.5.3 Career Option (Y)
Table 2.3 Operational Definition of Y
Definition Indicators Statements
Career O
pti
on
(Y
)
A career is the sum total
of paid and unpaid work,
learning and life roles you
undertake throughout
your life. The term
'career' was traditionally
associated with paid
employment and referred
to a single occupation.
(Zaidi & Iqbal, 2012)
1. Prospect
2. Sustained
3. Life style
4. Income
5. Reputable
6. Social
Acceptance
(Nga & Mun, 2011)
1. I would consider Paytren
MLM as a full-time
career prospect.
2. A career in Paytren
MLM would provide me
with a long-term
sustainable.
3. A career in Paytren
MLM would support my
life style choices.
4. I would consider Paytren
MLM as a reputable
career prospect.
5. I consider Paytren MLM
as a supplementary
income prospect
6. A career in Paytren
MLM would provide me
with good social
acceptance.
(Nga & Mun, 2011)
30
2.6 Research Gap
This study aims to the influence of Paytren MLM and agent attributes on
willingness to undertake multilevel marketing as a career option. This research is
focused on Paytren MLM in Indonesia. While the previous research by Nga &
Mun (2011) with the title “influence of general MLM and agent attributes on
willingness to undertake multilevel marketing as a career option among youth
conduct research in Malaysia and use general MLM to analyze the MLM career
among youth generation. The previous research not analyze the specific MLM
companies.
In the second previous research by (Hunnes, Kvaloy & Mohn, 2011) with the title
“Performance appraisal and career opportunities: A case study” analyze about the
career in oil company in Norway. The study conducted to find out performance
appraisal and career opportunities among leaders and employees. In conclusion,
this research is the research that examines the career of MLM companies among
Paytren members.
In the last previous research by (Koroth, 2014) with the title “Antecedents of
performance of multi-level channels in transitional economies” analyze about
factor that influence job satisfaction that related with career in multilevel
marketing. In this previous research, the research conducted in Kerala, India
among the general companies of MLM. While, in this research, the researcher
conduct research to specific MLM companies in Indonesia.
31
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Research Framework
First stage this research is determining the problem statement with 2 variables x
(Paytren MLM and Agent Attributes) and 1 variable y (Career). After that the
researcher should find the theory as literature review. Do pretest questionnaires to
validity test and reliability test. When the questionnaire valid and reliable, the
researcher analyzes the data and make the conclusion and recommendation at the
last.
3.2 Research Design
There are two methods in doing scientific research those are qualitative and
quantitative research. The differences between qualitative and quantitative
research are the type of data, research process, instrument in collecting data and
the purpose of research.
1. Qualitative research often gathers data from relatively small samples of
people and can provide a „micro‟ view of the issues. However, the relatively
small amount of data makes the researcher‟s job easier. Because qualitative
data often take the form of words, narratives and descriptions, which are not
easy to analyze, the researcher must do a lot of intelligent interpretation of
these data to identify relevant themes and to make these understandable and
credible for the reader (Lancaster University management school 2016).
2. Quantitative methods emphasize objective measurements and the statistical,
mathematical, or numerical analysis of data collected through polls,
questionnaires, and surveys, or by manipulating pre-existing statistical data
using computational techniques. Quantitative research focuses on gathering
numerical data and generalizing it across groups of people or to explain a
particular phenomenon (Labaree 2017).
32
Quantitative methods is used to quantify attitudes, opinions, behaviors, and other
defined variables – and generalize results from a larger sample population.
Quantitative Research uses measurable data to formulate facts and uncover
patterns in research. Quantitative data collection methods are much more
structured than Qualitative data collection methods (DeFranzo 2017). The
researcher uses quantitative method in conducting research.
3.3 Sampling Design
In the research, sampling design is used to identify the target population and then
determine whether a sample or a census is desired. Taking a sample requires that
the researcher examine or count all elements in the target population. The
sampling process must then give every person within the target population a
known nonzero chance of selection if probability sampling is used. If there is no
feasible alternative, a non-probability approach may be used (Cooper and
Schindler 2011).
3.3.1 Population
Population is the total number of objects and subjects that have certain
characteristics and qualities set by the researcher to be examined and then drawn
the conclusions(Sujarweni 2015) . The population is referring to the entire group
of people, events or records that contain the desired information and can answer
the measurement questions (Cooper and Schindler 2011).The target population of
this research are the members of Paytren MLM. The respondents are both female
and male.
3.3.2 Sample
A sample examines a portion of the target population, and the portion must
carefully have selected to represent that population (Cooper and Schindler 2011).
Sample on this research used to investigate the research problems. This Research
will use non-probability sampling to get the respondent.
In determining the correct required sample size, there are two factors that need to
be considered. Those two factors are margin error (confidence interval), and
33
confidence level (Pazzaglia, Stafford & Rodriguez, 2016). Margin of error is the
direction of deviation allowed for the survey results. Margin of error usually range
from 1% - 5%. Confidence level is the percentage of the sureness within
limitation of margin of error that the population will answer like the hypothesis.
The common confidence levels used for the research are 90%, 95% or 99%.
In this research, the researcher used Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) as a
method of testing the hypothesis. Since SEM is large sample technique, usually
the sample should be more than 200 respondents (N > 200) (Siddiqui, 2013). As
the sample should be more than 200, by entering 5% margin of error, 95%
confidence level, and the sample size used in this research is 250 respondents.
Sample Size = Number of question x 5
Sample Size = 35 x 5
Sample Size = 175 for the minimum
Source: (Suprianto, 2001)
3.4 Research Instrument
Research instrument is the tool that used to answer the research questions that
stated in the previous chapter. The Researcher intention is to gather the
information from as much various sources. Data can be obtained from primary
data and secondary data. Primary data refers to information obtained from
respondent through questionnaire, focus group, or the data from interview.
Secondary data obtained from books, magazine, article and etc(Sujarweni 2015).
In order to fulfill the validity of this research, the researcher use both of primary
data and secondary data.
3.4.1 Primary Data
Primary data are original works of research or raw data without interpretation or
pronouncements that represent an official opinion or position. Included among the
primary sources are memos, letters, complete interviews or speeches, law,
regulations, government data, labor data. Primary data are always the most
34
authoritative because the information has not been filtered or interpreted by a
second party (Cooper and Schindler 2011).
Primary data in this research of “Influence of Paytren MLM and Agent attributes
on the willingness to undertake multilevel marketing as a career option” is
obtained directly from the questionnaires that used for survey. Questionnaire are a
technique of data collection done by giving series of written statements that are
consist of research variables. These questionnaires will be spread to the number of
samples.
Likert type has been choosing for this research. Likert scale is used to measure
attitudes, opinions, and perceptions of a person or group of people about social
phenomena. with Likert scale, the variable to be measured is adjusted to indicator
variable. then the indicator is used as a measure to construct questions (Sujarweni
2015).
Table 3.1 Likert scale
1. Strongly
disagree 2. Disagree 3. Neutral 4. Agree
5. Strongly
Agree
Source: (Sujarweni 2015)
The questionnaire use Likert scale and all statements that express either a
favorable and unfavorable attitude will be scaled through Strongly disagree,
Disagree, Neutral, Agree, Strongly Agree.
Table 3.2 Likert Scale Questionnaire
No Statement SD D N A SA
Source:(Sujarweni 2015).
Each of five responses would have a numerical value which would be used to
measure the attitude under investigation. Likert scale have the advantage that they
35
do not expect a simple yes or no answer from the respondent, but rather allow for
degrees of opinion and even no opinion at all.
3.4.2 Secondary Data
Secondary data are interpretation of primary data. Encyclopedias, textbook,
handbooks, magazine and newspaper articles are considered secondary
information sources(Cooper and Schindler 2011).
Secondary data in this research is the literature studies. A literature studies is a
technique of data collection based on information gathered from books, journal,
and website. The data that obtained from secondary data is no need to processed
again. The sources do not directly provide data on the data collector (Sujarweni
2015).
3.5 Validity and Reliability
3.5.1 Validity
Validity is the extent to which the interpretations of the results of a test are
warranted, which depends on the particular use the test is intended to serve
(Kimberlin and Winterstein 2009).
For this research, the researcher will use the construct validity test. Construct
validity occurs when theoretical constructs of cause and effect accurately
represent the real-world situations they are intended to model (Grimm &
Widaman, 2012).There are three types of construct validity, which are:
1. Convergent validity
Convergent validity test whether constructs that should be related, are
related. Convergent validity helps to establish construct validity of when
there are two different measurement procedures and research methods.
36
2. Discriminant validity
Discriminant validity test whether believed unrelated constructs are, in
fact, unrelated. It is the extent to which the instrument doesn‟t have
correlation with another construct.
3. Nomo logical validity
Nomo logical validity requires a comparison at least two constructs and
that those constructs have a possible linkage. Both of these events occur,
and appear to have a correlation without being directly related to one
another.
In this research, the researcher will use the convergent validity test because I
occur where measures of construct that are expected to correlate do so (Sellars,
2014).
Validity test is done by using factor analysis in SPSS software. Factor
analysis is a multivariate statistical procedure that used to examine the entire
variable for interdependence (Birks & Malhotra, 2006). The data in this research
was calculated by using frequency distribution for section 1 (demographical
questions) and factor analysis for section II (Likert scale). According to Malhotra
(2010), factor analysis is conducted by following these steps:
1. Formulate the problem
2. Construct the correlation matrix
3. Determine the method of factor analysis
4. Determine the number of factors
5. Rotate the factors
6. Interpret the factors
7. Determine the model fit
The filled questionnaires will become the data for the research. The data will be
input into Microsoft Excel. The validity of the data will be tested by using
statistical software which is SPSS software. The validity of the data can be seen
through:
37
1. KMOMSA
KMOMSA (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy), this
measure varies between 0 and 1, and values closer to 1 are the better
(Bothma & Roodt, 2012). The data is valid if the significant value of
KMOMSA is greater than 0.6 (Bothma & Roodt, 2012) in order to
continue the factor analysis.
2. Barlett‟s Test
The next step is testing the entire correlation matrix (the correlation
between variables), as measured by the amount of Barlett‟s Test of
Sphericity. Barlett‟s test of sphericity is used to measure interns variable
correlation tested. It is using chi-square approach, Barlett‟s test of
sphericity should be lower than 0.5 in order to make the data become
valid (Malhotra, 2010).If the requirements explained before have been
passed, it directly determined that factor analysis is suitable for analyzing
the data.
3. Communalities
This is a table that shows a variable‟s amount of variance for
communalities that should be above 0.5 (Communalities > 0.5) and
all variables share with the other variables being considered (Birks
& Malhotra, 2006).
4. Total variance
Malhotra and Bircks (2006) stated that to determine the number of factors,
the researcher must consider the total variance explained by the data in
factor analysis. There is cumulative column which representing a
percentage of variable explained through this study with considerate
number at least 60%.
38
5. Rotated Component Matrix
Rotated Component Matrix is used to deliver a table that consist of factor
loading of each variable on the component and delivered a relationship of
variable and component. Convergent validity and divergent validity are
ways to assess the construct validity of a measurement procedure
(Malhotra & Bircks, 2006). Convergent validity is used when there are
two similar questions reveal the same result, while divergent
validity is used when there are two opposite questions reveal
opposite results. Testing for this type of validity are required for a
research.
3.5.2 Reliability
Not only valid, but the data also has to be reliable. Reliability test is a measure of
a stability and consistency of respondents in answering things related to the
question which is the dimension of a variable and arranged in a form of
questionnaire. Reliability test can be done together to all questions if the value of
alpha > 0.60 then reliable(Sujarweni 2015). The reliability of this research will be
tested using SPSS software as well. The reliability can be seen through
“Cronbach‟s Alpha” in reliability statistic. Cronbach‟s Alpha determines the
internal consistency or average correlation of items in survey instrument to gauge
its reliability (Quansah, 2017). Cronbach‟s Alpha coefficient ranges in value from
0 to 1. The higher the score, the more reliable the generated scales is. Cronbach‟s
coefficient is the most often used for each set of measures to test reliability of a
multi-item scale. The Cronbach‟s coefficient formula is:
α = k . r
1+ (k-1) . r
Where:
α = Coefficient of Cronbach‟s Alpha
r = Average of correlation between questions
k = Total of questions in scale
39
3.6 Data Gathering Procedure
The researcher collected the data by spreading the questionnaires online by using
Google Drive and offline using printed questionnaires to the targeted respondents.
This research is using self-assessment, means that the respondent will fill out the
questionnaire and assess by themselves. This research is limited for individuals
who are already become a member of Paytren‟s MLM.
3.7 Testing the Hypothesis
3.7.1 Structural Equation Modeling Analysis (SEM Analysis)
Quantitative data analysis is helpful in evaluation because it provides quantifiable
and easy to understand results. Structural equation modeling analysis or SEM is a
very general, chiefly linear, chiefly cross sectional statistical modeling technique.
Factor analysis, Path analysis and regression all represent special cases of SEM.
Analysis technique used in this research is Structural Equation Modeling Analysis
(SEM Analysis). In SEM, interest usually focuses on latent constructs - abstract
psychological variables like "intelligence" or "attitude toward the brand", rather
than on the manifest variables used to measure these constructs. Measurement is
recognized as difficult and error-prone. By explicitly modeling measurement
error, SEM users seek to derive unbiased estimates for the relations between latent
constructs. To this end, SEM allows multiple measures to be associated with a
single latent construct.
Compared to regression and factor analysis, SEM is a relatively young field,
having its roots in papers that appeared only in the late 1960s. As such, the
methodology is still developing, and even fundamental concepts are subject to
challenge and revision (Bowen & Guo, 2012).
40
Table 3. 3 Tools for Measuring Model Fit
No. MeasurementDegree
ofCompatibility Description
Acceptable Level
Match
1 Chi Square
Normed Chi Square
(X2 /df )
Testing whether the estimated
population covariance same with
sample covariance (whether the
model fits the data)
The ratio between the values of
chi square with degree of
freedom.
Lower limit = 1.0
After Limit = 2.0 or
3.0
X2
/ df> 5
2 The minimum sample
discrepancy function
divided with degree
of freedom
(CMIN/DF)
Statistic chi square divided
degree of freedom
≤ 2.00
3
Root Mean Square
Error of
Approximation
(RMSEA)
The average difference in degree
of freedom which is expected to
occur in population, and not the
sample
RMSEA ≤ 0.08 (good
fit) RMSEA < 0.05
(close fit)
4 Comparative Fit
Index (CFI)
Feasibility test of the proposed
model with the basic model. If
CFI closer to 1, indicating the
highest level of fit
Lower limit = 0
Upper limit = 1
5 Tucker Lewis Index
(TLI)
Comparing a model that was
tested against a baseline model.
The size measure combines
parsimony into a comparative
index between the proposed
Lower limit = 0
Upper limit = 1.0
41
model and null model.
6 Incremental Fit Index
(IFI)
Subtract the hypothesized models
in the denominator, to check if
the hypothesis model is correct.
IFI ≥ 0.90
7 (S)RMR The squareroot of the difference
betweenthe residuals of the
sample covariance matrixand the
hypothesized model. If items
vary inrange (i.e. some items are
1-5, others 1-7)then RMR is hard
to interpret, betterto useSRMR.
SRMR < 0.08
Source: (Cangur & Ercan, 2015)
Table 3.4 Goodness Fit Index Value
Source: (Hooper, Coughlan & Mullen, 2008)
42
CHAPTER IV
DATA ANALYSIS
4.1 Company Profile
According to Paytren (2018) states that PT. Veritra Sentosa International or
Paytren as its product was born On July 10, 2013. The company obtained Direct
Sales License (SIUPL) with number: 45/1 / IU / PMDN / 2014. Paytren
recognizes the importance of maintaining a good reputation and takes
responsibility and professionalism the height of every business involved, based on
trust and honesty. Some of the business principles applied in the company are
actions that are fully responsible with good integrity, based on Islamic norms,
obey the prevailing laws and regulations and respect the culture and traditions of
Indonesian society. Company Partners as one of the business actors that influence
the company's reputation. PT. VSI is equipped with a Code of Ethics and Conduct
to avoid conflicts of interest, misuse of authority and misuse of information. This
Partner Behavior is governed by the Code of Conduct, aiming at each Partner
always acting ethically, consistently and integrity in accordance with company
principles in fostering public trust.
Paytren is a smartphone-based transaction application created and developed by
PT. Veritra Sentosa International. The purpose of this application is to facilitate
users in performing routine transactions such as the contents of all operator
pulses, pay bills, buy airline tickets and trains, and others.
Benefit of the paytren application is the efficiency of time and cost efficiency
because paytren users pay bills paying at a cheaper price. In addition, paytren
provides cashback from every transaction and can be a financial enhancement tool
because every transaction is in the hands of the users.
Revenue offered by paytren is if the user successfully sells the license or paytren
business rights to others. Licenses or business rights can be obtained if we join
and join as a partner paytren.
43
4.2 Respondent Profile
4.2.1 Gender
Figure 4.1 Gender of Respondents
Constructed by researcher, source: Google Forms (2018)
Based on Figure 4.1, it shows that from the 250 respondents examined in this
research, the majority of the respondent is female. Specifically, there are 127
female respondents and the number of male respondents are 123 persons.
4.2.2 Age
Figure 4.2 Age of Respondents
Constructed by researcher, source: Google Forms (2018)
Based on the age classification from Health Department of the Republic of
Indonesia, people with age of < 17 years old classified as early teens, people with
50,8% 49,2%
Female
Male
2,0%
28,4%
50,4%
17,6%
1,6%
< 17 tahun/years old
17-25 tahun/years old
26-35 tahun/years old
36-45 tahun/years old
46-55 tahun/years old
44
age of 17-25 years old classified as late teens, people with age of 26-35 years old
classified as early adults, people with age of 36-45 years old classified as late
adults, people with age of 46-55 years old classified as early elderly, and people
with age of 56- 65 years old classified as late elderly.
As seen in the Figure 4.2, it can be concluded that from the total of 250
respondents examined in this research, the majority of respondent in this research
is the early adults. Specifically, there are 71 late teen respondents, 126 early adult
respondents, and 44 late adult respondents.
4.2.3 Occupation
Figure 4.3 Occupation of Respondents
Constructed by researcher, source: Google Forms (2018)
Based on Figure 4.3, it shows that from the 250 respondents examined in this
research, the majority of the respondent is the private employees. Specifically,
there are 101 private employees, 100 entrepreneurs, and 42 housewives.
0,8%
40,4%
40,0%
16,8%
2,0%
Civil Servant (PNS)
Private Employee (Karyawan Perusahaan)
Entrepreneur (Pengusaha)
House Wife (Ibu Rumah Tangga)
Unemployment (Pengangguran)
45
4.2.4 Latest Education
Figure 4.4 Latest Education of Respondents
Constructed by researcher, source: Google Forms (2018)
As seen in the Figure 4.4, the researcher can conclude that from the 250
respondents examined in this research, the majority of respondent have senior
high school as their latest education. In specific, there are 172 senior high school
graduates, 73 bachelor graduates, and 5 junior high school graduates.
4.2.5 Monthly Income
Figure 4.5 Monthly Income of Respondents
Constructed by researcher, source: Google Forms (2018)
As seen in the Figure 4.5, it is known that from the total of 250 respondents
examined in this research, the majority of respondent in this research is people
2,0%
68,8%
29,2%
Junior High School (SMP)
Senior High School (SMA)
Bachelor Degree (Sarjana S1)
2,0%
28,0%
33,2%
23,2%
11,2% 2,4% No Income ( Tidak ada penghasilan )
Less than IDR 3,600,000 ( < 3,600,000 )
IDR 4,501,000 - IDR 6,000,000
IDR 6,001,000 - IDR 7,200,000
IDR 7,201,000 - IDR 10,000,000
More than 10,000,000 ( > 10,000,000 )
46
with monthly income ranged IDR 4,501,000 - IDR 6,000,000 as much as 83
respondents. The remaining respondents are people with monthly income less
than IDR 3,600,000 as much as 70 respondents, monthly income ranged IDR
6,001,000 - IDR 7,200,000 as much as 58 respondents and monthly income
ranged IDR 7,201,000 - IDR 10,000,000 as much as 28 respondents.
4.3 Validity Test
To test the validity of this research data, the researcher used the Kaiser-Meyer-
Olkin (KMO), Barlett's Test, Communalities and Rotated Component Matrix as
parameters. Based on preliminary test results, there are some invalid items
because they are not in one factor. This can be seen in the following Rotated
Component Matrix table.
Table 4.1 Rotated Component Matrix
Rotated Component Matrixa
Component
1 2 3 4 5 6
COM1 ,609
COM2 ,788
COM3 ,683
COM4 ,661
COM5 ,777
COM6 ,401
SRV1 ,522
SRV2 ,678
SRV3 ,653
SRV4 ,551
RSC1 ,673
RSC2 ,583
RSC3 ,709
AG1 ,537
AG2 ,425
AG3 ,507
TRS1 ,812
TRS2 ,815
TRS3 ,632
CRO1 ,708
47
CRO2 ,700
CRO3 ,488
CRO4 ,441
CRO5 ,680
CRO6 ,653
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.
a. Rotation converged in 9 iterations.
Source: SPSS 24.0 Analysis Output (2018)
Based on the test results of rotated component matrix above, it can be seen that
there are several items that are not valid because it does not form the same factor.
So, it is processed further by take out one by one the invalid items starting with
the item which has the lowest value and in the same factor with the lowest number
of items. So as to obtain the final result of 13 items of valid statement and will be
used for further test.
4.3.1 KMO-MSA Barlett’s Test
Table 4.2 KMO-MSA Barlett’s Test
KMO and Bartlett's Test
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. .901
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity
Approx. Chi-Square 1947.977
Df 78
Sig. .000
Source: SPSS 24.0 Analysis Output (2018)
According to the table result above, it can be seen that the value of KMO of 0.901
(greater than 0.5) indicates that the samples taken are adequate. Bartlett's Test of
Sphericity significance of 0.000 (less than 0.05) indicates that research variables
can be predicted and analyzed.
48
4.3.2 Communalities
Table 4.3 Communalities
Communalities
Initial Extraction
COM1 1.000 .777
COM2 1.000 .778
COM3 1.000 .782
SRV2 1.000 .806
SRV3 1.000 .728
RSC1 1.000 .903
RSC3 1.000 .885
TRS1 1.000 .874
TRS2 1.000 .835
TRS3 1.000 .701
CRO1 1.000 .737
CRO5 1.000 .777
CRO6 1.000 .767
Extraction Method: Principal
Component Analysis.
Source: SPSS 24.0 Analysis Output (2018)
According to the table results above, researcher obtained the initial value and
extraction value. Initial value is a variant variable before the extract is done. All
the initial values is 1, this means that before the extraction of these variables
100% form the factor. Due to non-extraction factor, thus there are 13 factors.
Extraction value describes the percentage of a variant variables that can be
explained by factors to be formed. For the COM1 indicator, the extraction value is
0.777. this means that 77.7% of the variant of the COM1 indicator can be
explained by the factors to be formed. Similarly for other variables, the greater the
value of extraction shows the stronger the relationship with the factors that will be
formed.
49
4.3.3 Total Variance Explained
The determination of the number of factors required to represent the variables to
be analyzed is based on the magnitude of the eigenvalue and the percentage of the
total variance.
Table 4.4 Total Variance Explained
Total Variance Explained
Component Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings
1 6.765 52.042 52.042 6.765 52.042 52.042
2 1.147 8.823 60.865 1.147 8.823 60.865
3 .973 7.482 68.347 .973 7.482 68.347
4 .815 6.267 74.614 .815 6.267 74.614
5 .651 5.009 79.623 .651 5.009 79.623
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Source: SPSS 24.0 Analysis Output (2018)
Based on Table 4.4, researcher can obtain information that the number of factors
formed is 5 factors with a cumulative percentage of 79.623. This shows that
79.623% of all variables can be explained by the 5 factors formed.
4.3.4 Construct Validity Test
4.3.4.1 Discriminant Validity
Discriminant validity test is to determine the correlation between each item with
other items.
Table 4.5 Correlation matrix
Correlation Matrixa
COM1 COM2 COM3 SRV2 SRV3 RSC1 RSC3 TRS1 TRS2 TRS3 CRO1 CRO5 CRO6
Correlation
COM1 1.000 .542 .494 .304 .334 .390 .379 .355 .316 .395 .391 .440 .388
COM2 .542 1.000 .633 .425 .462 .460 .429 .342 .301 .459 .425 .411 .368
COM3 .494 .633 1.000 .441 .462 .501 .417 .467 .404 .481 .300 .367 .349
SRV2 .304 .425 .441 1.000 .591 .475 .523 .418 .396 .463 .500 .483 .446
SRV3 .334 .462 .462 .591 1.000 .574 .566 .469 .465 .451 .480 .503 .455
RSC1 .390 .460 .501 .475 .574 1.000 .803 .541 .565 .548 .446 .547 .554
RSC3 .379 .429 .417 .523 .566 .803 1.000 .508 .496 .531 .504 .532 .558
TRS1 .355 .342 .467 .418 .469 .541 .508 1.000 .792 .680 .444 .521 .569
50
TRS2 .316 .301 .404 .396 .465 .565 .496 .792 1.000 .611 .358 .489 .456
TRS3 .395 .459 .481 .463 .451 .548 .531 .680 .611 1.000 .411 .500 .536
CRO1 .391 .425 .300 .500 .480 .446 .504 .444 .358 .411 1.000 .587 .543
CRO5 .440 .411 .367 .483 .503 .547 .532 .521 .489 .500 .587 1.000 .719
CRO6 .388 .368 .349 .446 .455 .554 .558 .569 .456 .536 .543 .719 1.000
a. Determinant = ,000
Source: SPSS 24.0 Analysis Output (2018)
As shown in the result table above, it can be seen that the indicators COM1-
COM2 and COM3 have the highest correlation with each indicator compared with
other indicators. Likewise, SRV2 and SRV3 indicators have the highest
correlation with each of these indicators compared to other indicators. Indicators
SRC1 and SRC3 have the highest correlation with each of these indicators
compared to other indicators. Indicators TRS1, TRS2 and TRS3 have the highest
correlation with each of these indicators compared to other indicators. CRO1,
CRO5 and CRO6 indicators have the highest correlation with each of these
indicators compared to other indicators. Therefore, it can be concluded that each
indicator already has good discriminant validity.
4.3.4.2 Convergent Validity
Convergent validity test is to determine whether the indicators used are valid in
describing the variable.
Table 4.6 Rotated Component Matrix
Rotated Component Matrixa
Component
1 2 3 4 5
COM1 .766
COM2 .786
COM3 .733
SRV2 .794
SRV3 .670
RSC1 .801
RSC3 .797
TRS1 .848
TRS2 .847
51
TRS3 .684
CRO1 .719
CRO5 .749
CRO6 .726
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization.a
a. Rotation converged in 6 iterations.
Source: SPSS 24.0 Analysis Output (2018)
According to the result table above, it can be seen that each indicator has formed a
same factor. COM1, COM2 and COM3 are in one factor, this shows that COM1,
COM2 and COM3 are valid as measurement tool for Company variable. The
SRV2 and SRV3 indicators are also in one factor, indicating that SRV2 and SRV3
are valid as measurement tool for Service variable. The SRV2 and SRV3
indicators are also in one factor, indicating that RSC1 and RSC3 are valid as
measurement tool for Reward scheme variable. Indicators TRS1, TRS2 and TRS3
are also in one factor, this indicates that TRS1, TRS2 and TRS3 are valid as
measurement tool for Trust variable. CRO1, CRO5 and CRO6 indicators are also
in one factor, indicating that CRO1, CRO5 and CRO6 are valid as measurement
tool for Career option variable.
4.4 Reliability Test
Reliability test is used to determine whether the indicators are consistent as a
measurement tool of each variable.
Table 4.7 Reliability Test
Variable Cronbach's Alpha Critical Point Conclusion
Company 0,789 0,6 Reliable
Service 0,741 0,6 Reliable
Reward scheme 0,891 0,6 Reliable
52
Trust 0,872 0,6 Reliable
Career option 0,829 0,6 Reliable
Source: SPSS 24.0 Analysis Output (2018)
Based on the result table above, it can be seen that the value of Cronbach's Alpha
for each variable is > 0.6. This shows that all indicators have consistency in
describing each variable in this research.
4.5 Descriptive Analysis
4.5.1 Company Variable Description
1
33
46
88 82
0
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5
Paytren Company have been in business for a long time.
2 9
49
106
84
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1 2 3 4 5
Paytren company have a good brand names.
10
29
78 78
55
0
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5
Paytren company are reputable.
53
Figure 4.6 Frequency Distribution of Company Variable
Source: Google Forms (2018)
Table 4.8 Frequency Distribution of Company Variable
Items Scale
Total 1 2 3 4 5
Paytren company have a good
brand name.
F 2 9 49 106 84 250
% 0,8% 3,6% 19,6% 42,4% 33,6% 100,0%
Paytren Company have been in
business for a long time.
F 1 33 46 88 82 250
% 0,4% 13,2% 18,4% 35,2% 32,8% 100,0%
Paytren company are reputable. F 10 29 78 78 55 250
% 4,0% 11,6% 31,2% 31,2% 22,0% 100,0%
1 = Strongly disagree 2 = Disagree 3= Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree
Source: Google Forms (2018)
As shown in the result table above, it can be seen that there are 42.4% of
respondents who agreed that Paytren Company has a good brand name. And,
there are 35.2% of the respondents who agreed that Paytren Company has been in
MLM business for a long time and 31,2% of respondents also agreed that Paytren
Company has a good reputation.
4.5.2 Service Variable Description
1 = Strongly disagree 2 = Disagree 3= Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree
1 22
68
100
59
0
50
100
150
1 2 3 4 5
Paytren company provides easy access to the product
6 22
64
94
64
0
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5
Paytren company products are high quality
54
1 = Strongly disagree 2 = Disagree 3= Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree
Figure 4.7 Frequency Distribution of Service Variable
Source: Google Forms (2018)
Table 4.9 Frequency Distribution of Service Variable
Items Scale
Total 1 2 3 4 5
Paytren company provides easy access
to the product.
F 1 22 68 100 59 250
% 0,4% 8,8% 27,2% 40,0% 23,6% 100,0%
Paytren company products are high
quality.
F 6 22 64 94 64 250
% 2,4% 8,8% 25,6% 37,6% 25,6% 100,0%
1 = Strongly disagree 2 = Disagree 3= Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree
Source: Google Forms (2018)
Based on the result table above, it can be seen that there are 40.0% of respondents
who agree the Paytren Company provides easy access to the product / application
Paytren. Also, there are 37.6% of the respondents who agreed that Paytren
companies have products / applications that are very qualified.
4.5.3 Reward Scheme Variable Description
5 17
73
102
53
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1 2 3 4 5
Paytren MLM schemes are legal
4 14
72
104
56
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1 2 3 4 5
Paytren MLM schemes reward sales agents at the top the most
55
1 = Strongly disagree 2 = Disagree 3= Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree
Figure 4.8 Frequency Distribution of Reward Scheme Variable
Source: Google Forms (2018)
Table 4.10 Frequency Distribution of Reward Scheme Variable
Items Scale
Total 1 2 3 4 5
Paytren MLM schemes are legal. F 5 17 73 102 53 250
% 2,0% 6,8% 29,2% 40,8% 21,2% 100,0%
Paytren MLM schemes reward sales agents
at the top the most
F 4 14 72 104 56 250
% 1,6% 5,6% 28,8% 41,6% 22,4% 100,0%
1 = Strongly disagree 2 = Disagree 3= Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree
Source: Google Forms (2018)
From the result table above, it can be seen that there are 40.8% of respondents
who agreed that Paytren MLM scheme legally valid. And there are 41.6% of the
respondents who agreed that Paytren's MLM scheme reward sales agents at the
top the most.
56
4.5.4 Trust Variable Description
1 = Strongly disagree 2 = Disagree 3= Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree
Figure 4.9 Frequency Distribution of Trust Variable
Source: Google Forms (2018)
Table 4.11 Frequency Distribution of Trust Variable
Items Scale
Total 1 2 3 4 5
The sales agent is a friend of mine. F 6 19 94 83 48 250
6
19
94 83
48
0
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5
The sales agent is a friend of mine
4
31
80 82
53
0
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5
The sales agent is introduced by a friend of mine
6 11
69
115
49
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
1 2 3 4 5
The sales agent of Paytren MLM displays integrity
57
% 2,4% 7,6% 37,6% 33,2% 19,2% 100,0%
The sales agent is introduced by a
friend of mine
F 4 31 80 82 53 250
% 1,6% 12,4% 32,0% 32,8% 21,2% 100,0%
The sales agent of Paytren MLM
displays integrity
F 6 11 69 115 49 250
% 2,4% 4,4% 27,6% 46,0% 19,6% 100,0%
1 = Strongly disagree 2 = Disagree 3= Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree
Source: Google Forms (2018)
According to Table 4.11, it can be seen that there are 33.2% of respondents who
agreed that the sales partners / business partners who make me join Paytren is my
friend. Also, there are 32.8% of the respondents who agreed that the Sales Partner
/Business Partner was introduced by my friend. And there are 46.0% of the
respondents who agreed that the sales partners of Paytren MLM display integrity.
4.5.5 Career Option Variable Description
9
58
101 82
0
50
100
150
2 3 4 5
I would consider paytren MLM as a full-time career prospect
2
21
67
88
72
0
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5
I would consider paytren MLM as a reputable career prospect
2 10
55
93 90
0
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5
I consider Paytren MLM as a supplementary income prospect
58
1 = Strongly disagree 2 = Disagree 3= Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree
Figure 4.10 Frequency Distribution of Career Option Variable
Source: Google Forms (2018)
Table 4.12 Frequency Distribution of Career Option Variable
Items Scale
Total 1 2 3 4 5
I would consider Paytren MLM as a full-
time career prospect.
F 0 9 58 101 82 250
% 0,0% 3,6% 23,2% 40,4% 32,8% 100,0%
I would consider Paytren MLM as a
reputable career prospect.
F 2 10 55 93 90 250
% 0,8% 4,0% 22,0% 37,2% 36,0% 100,0%
I consider Paytren MLM as a
supplementary income prospect
F 3 9 60 99 79 250
% 1,2% 3,6% 24,0% 39,6% 31,6% 100,0%
1 = Strongly disagree 2 = Disagree 3= Neutral 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree
Source: Google Forms (2018)
Based on the above table, it can be seen that there are 40.4% of respondents who
agree that they will consider MLM Paytren as the main career. Also, there are
37.2% of the respondents who agreed to consider MLM Paytren as a prospect.
And there are 39.6% of respondents agreed to consider Paytren MLM as an
additional revenue prospect.
59
4.6 The Overview of Career Option Variables Based on Demographics
Respondent
4.6.1 Career option variable based on gender
Table 4.13 Career option based on gender
Gender Item N Min Max Mean Std.
Deviation
Female
full-time career prospect 127 2 5 4,01 0,81
reputable career prospect 127 1 5 3,97 0,94
supplementary income prospect 127 1 5 3,96 0,89
Male
full-time career prospect 123 2 5 4,04 0,87
reputable career prospect 123 2 5 4,11 0,86
supplementary income prospect 123 1 5 3,98 0,92
Based on the results of the calculations presented in the table above can be seen
that the average of respondents to the statement of "full-time career prospect" in
the male respondents group of 4.04 higher than female respondents of 4.01.
While the average of respondents to the statement of "reputable career prospect"
in the group of male respondents of 4.11 higher than female respondents of 3.97.
And the average of respondents to the statement of "supplementary income
prospect" in the male respondents group of 3.98 higher than female respondents of
3.96.This shows that male respondents are more interested in making Paytren
MLM as career than female respondent group
4.6.2 Career option variables based on age
Table 4.14 Career option based on age
Age Item N Min Max Mean Std.
Deviation
< 17 years old
full-time career prospect 5 4 5 4,60 0,55
reputable career prospect 5 3 5 4,40 0,89
supplementary income
prospect 5 3 5 4,40 0,89
17-25 years old
full-time career prospect 71 2 5 3,99 0,80
reputable career prospect 71 1 5 3,87 0,96
supplementary income 71 1 5 3,87 0,89
60
prospect
26-35 years old
full-time career prospect 126 2 5 4,08 0,82
reputable career prospect 126 2 5 4,09 0,90
supplementary income
prospect 126 2 5 4,02 0,88
36-45 years old
full-time career prospect 44 2 5 3,82 0,97
reputable career prospect 44 2 5 4,09 0,83
supplementary income
prospect 44 2 5 3,91 1,01
46-55 years old
full-time career prospect 4 4 5 4,50 0,58
reputable career prospect 4 4 5 4,25 0,50
supplementary income
prospect 4 4 5 4,25 0,50
Based on the results of the calculations presented in table above, it can be seen
that the average of respondents to the statement "full-time career prospect" is 4.60
at the highest respondent found in <17 years / years old and the lowest average of
3.82 found in 36-45 years old respondents.
And the average of respondents to the statement of "supplementary income
prospect" was 4.40 at <17 years / years old and the lowest average of 3.87 was 17-
25 years old.
This shows that respondents who are <17 years old are more interested in making
Paytren MLM as a career compared to other age groups.
4.6.3 Career option variables based on occupation
Table 4.15 Career Option based on Occupation
Occupation Item N Min Max Mean Std.
Deviation
Civil Servant
full-time career prospect 2 4 5 4,50 0,71
reputable career prospect 2 3 4 3,50 0,71
supplementary income
prospect 2 4 4 4,00 0,00
Private
Employee
full-time career prospect 101 2 5 3,86 0,92
reputable career prospect 101 1 5 3,85 0,96
supplementary income 101 1 5 3,77 0,99
61
prospect
Entrepreneur
full-time career prospect 100 3 5 4,11 0,79
reputable career prospect 100 2 5 4,14 0,83
supplementary income
prospect 100 2 5 4,06 0,81
House Wife
full-time career prospect 42 2 5 4,12 0,74
reputable career prospect 42 2 5 4,21 0,87
supplementary income
prospect 42 2 5 4,17 0,82
Unemployment
full-time career prospect 5 4 5 4,60 0,55
reputable career prospect 5 3 5 4,40 0,89
supplementary income
prospect 5 3 5 4,40 0,89
Based on the results of the calculations presented in the table above, it can be seen
that the highest result of respondents to the statement "full-time career prospect"
is 4.60 found in the group of unemployment respondents and the lowest result is
3.86 in the group of Private employee respondents.
While the average of respondent‟s assesment to the statement of "reputable career
prospect" is 4.40 which is the highest results is on unemployment respondents and
the lowest result is 3.50 in the Civil Servant respondents group.
And the average of respondents to the statement of "supplementary income
prospect" is 4.40 in the group of unemployment respondents and the lowest score
is 3.77 in the group of respondents of Private Employee.
This shows that in the group of respondents Unemployment more interested to
make Paytren MLM as a career compared to other age groups.
62
4.6.4 Career option variable based on latest education
Table 4.16 Career option based on latest education
Latest Education Item N Min Max Mean Std.
Deviation
Junior High
School
full-time career prospect 5 4 5 4,60 0,55
reputable career prospect 5 3 5 4,40 0,89
supplementary income
prospect 5 3 5 4,40 0,89
Senior High
School
full-time career prospect 172 2 5 4,08 0,81
reputable career prospect 172 1 5 4,05 0,94
supplementary income
prospect 172 1 5 4,05 0,89
Bachelor Degree
full-time career prospect 73 2 5 3,85 0,89
reputable career prospect 73 2 5 3,97 0,82
supplementary income
prospect 73 2 5 3,74 0,88
Based on the results of the calculations presented in the table above, it can be seen
that the average of respondents to the statement of "full-time career prospect" is
4.60 which is the highest in the group of Junior high school respondent and the
lowest average of 3,85 are in the respondent group of bachelor degree.
While the average of respondents to the statement of "reputable career prospect"
is 4.40 which is in the group of Junior High School respondents as the highest
result and the lowest average of 3.97 is in the group of respondents bachelor
degree.
And the average of respondents to the statement of "supplementary income
prospect" is 4.40 is in the Junior High School respondents group and the lowest
average of 3.74 is found in the group of respondents Bachelor Degree (Bachelor
Degree).
This shows that in the group of respondents Junior High School (SMP) more
interested to make Paytren MLM as a career compared to other age groups.
63
4.6.5 Career option variables based on monthly income
Table 4.17 Career option based on monthly income
Monthly
Income Item N Min Max Mean
Std.
Deviation
No Income
full-time career prospect 5 4 5 4,60 0,55
reputable career prospect 5 3 5 4,40 0,89
supplementary income prospect 5 3 5 4,40 0,89
Less than IDR
3,600,000 ( <
3,600,000 )
full-time career prospect 70 3 5 4,06 0,70
reputable career prospect 70 2 5 4,07 0,82
supplementary income prospect 70 3 5 4,14 0,77
IDR 4,501,000 -
IDR 6,000,000
full-time career prospect 83 2 5 4,20 0,89
reputable career prospect 83 1 5 4,04 0,98
supplementary income prospect 83 1 5 3,94 0,95
IDR 6,001,000 -
IDR 7,200,000
full-time career prospect 58 2 5 3,83 0,90
reputable career prospect 58 2 5 4,03 0,90
supplementary income prospect 58 2 5 3,90 0,95
IDR 7,201,000 -
IDR 10,000,000
full-time career prospect 28 3 5 3,64 0,78
reputable career prospect 28 2 5 3,75 0,89
supplementary income prospect 28 2 5 3,57 0,84
More than
10,000,000 ( >
10,000,000 )
full-time career prospect 6 4 5 4,33 0,52
reputable career prospect 6 4 5 4,67 0,52
supplementary income prospect 6 3 5 4,50 0,84
Based on the results of the calculations presented in the table above, it can be seen
that the average of respondents to the statement of "full-time career prospect" at
the highest result is 4.60 in the group of respondents no income and the lowest
average of 3,64 are in the group of respondents IDR 7,201,000 - IDR 10,000,000.
While the average of respondents to the statement of "reputable career prospect"
at the highest result is 4.67 in the group of respondents more than 10,000,000 (>
10,000,000) and the lowest average of 3.73 is in the group of respondents IDR
7,201,000 - IDR 10,000,000.
64
And the average of respondents to the “supplementary income prospect”
statements is 4.50 as the highest result in the group of respondents of more than
10,000,000 (> 10,000,000) and the lowest result is 3.74 in the respondent group of
IDR 7,201,000 - IDR 10,000,000.
This shows that in a group of respondents with income more than 10,000,000 (>
10,000,000) per month more interested to make Paytren MLM as a career
compared to other groups.
4.6.6 Influence of Demographic towards Career Option
Table 4.18 Career Option based on Demographic
Source
Type III
Sum of
Squares
df Mean
Square F Sig.
Corrected Model 79,312 85,000 0,933 2,362 0,000
Intercept 1051,330 1,000 1051,330 2661,703 0,000
Gender 1,235 1,000 1,235 3,128 0,079
Age 0,189 3,000 0,063 0,160 0,923
Occupation 0,733 3,000 0,244 0,618 0,604
Latest_Education 0,034 1,000 0,034 0,086 0,770
Monthly_Income 4,113 4,000 1,028 2,604 0,038
Error 64,777 164,000 0,395
Total 4162,778 250,000
Corrected Total 144,089 249,000
a. R Squared = 0,550 (Adjusted R Squared = 0,317)
From the results of ANOVA calculations presented in the table above it appears
that only on Monthly_Income factors that have a significance value smaller than
0.05 which is 0.038 that indicates the career option in each group
Monthly_Income different from each other. While the factors of Gender, Age,
Occupation and Latest education have no significant differences in each group of
demographic factors. So it can be concluded that from 5 factor demographic only
Monthly_Income which have significant effect to career option.
65
4.7 Structural Equation Model (SEM) Analysis
In this study, there are five latent variables, that are Company, Service, Reward
Scheme, Trust and Career Option. Each of the latent variable is measured by
several observed variables / indicators. For SEM analysis, the researcher used
AMOS software with maximum likelihood estimation. Here are the results of Full
Structural Model test:
Figure 4.11 Full Structural Model (Standardized)
Source: AMOS (2018)
Furthermore, researcher will describe the evaluation results of the fit model and
the parameter values estimated from the structural equation model. The empirical
model resulting from the theoretical model in this study requires full model
testing.
SEM full model test is done with two kinds of test that are the suitability model
test and the causality significance test through regression coefficient. SEM full
66
model test is used to see the model feasibility or suitability of the research model.
The model conformity indexes used were not different from the indexes in the
confirmatory factor analysis. Evaluation of the suitability of a good model of
structural equation by comparing the values of the recommended fit indexes as
presented in the following table:
Table 4.19 Evaluation of Fit Indexes Structural Model
Index Fit Result Recommended Value Model Evaluation
Chi-Square 122,407
Probability 0,000 > 0,05
Chi-Square/DF 2,226 < 2 Marginal fit
GFI 0,931 > 0,90 Good fit
RMSEA 0,070 < 0,08 Good fit
AGFI 0,886 > 0,90 Marginal fit
TLI 0,950 > 0,90 Good fit
CFI 0,965 > 0,90 Good fit
RMR 0,039 < 0,08 Good fit
Source: AMOS (2018)
Based on Table 4.12, it can be seen the results of overall model fit test obtained Chi-
Square value of 122.407 with probability value of 0.000 and RMSEA value of 0.070.
When referring to the value of RMSEA then the model is fit as well as with other GOF
index that have shown the fit criteria, so that it can be continued in the next analysis
phase.
After the model suitability test, researcher did the further test which is the
hypotheses testing through structural model. The following table summarizes the
estimation results of the structural model of the relationship between the latent
variables through the regression coefficient test:
67
Table 4.20Regression Weight
Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label
CRO <--- COM ,029 ,063 ,457 ,648 par_9
CRO <--- SRV ,257 ,100 2,556 ,011 par_10
CRO <--- RSC ,164 ,077 2,117 ,034 par_11
CRO <--- TRS ,246 ,071 3,444 *** par_12
Source: AMOS (2018)
Based on the Regression Weight test results above, it shows that the regression
coefficient of Company variable (COM) toward Career option (CRO) is 0.029.
The coefficient is positive. Meaning that if the Company (COM) variable
increases one unit, the Career option (CRO) will increase by 0.029.
The regression coefficient of Service variable (SRV) toward Career option (CRO)
is 0,257. The coefficient is positive. Meaning that if the Service (SRV) variable
increases one unit, the Career option (CRO) will increase by 0.257.
The regression coefficient of Reward scheme variable (RSC) toward Career
option (CRO) is 0,164. The coefficient is positive. That is, if the Reward Scheme
(RSC) variable increases one unit, the Career option (CRO) will increase by
0.164.
The regression coefficient of Trust variable (TRS) toward Career option (CRO) is
0,246. The coefficient is positive. It indicates that if the Trust variable (TRS)
increases one unit, the Career option (CRO) will increase by 0.246.
To determine the strength of influence of each independent variable toward
Career option (CRO) can be seen from the following path coefficients:
Table 4.21 Standardized Regression Weight
Estimate
CRO <--- COM ,042
CRO <--- SRV ,359
CRO <--- RSC ,229
68
Estimate
CRO <--- TRS ,289
Source: AMOS (2018)
From the result of standardized coefficient shown in table above, it shows that all
the standardized coefficient is positive. This means there is a unidirectional
relationship between the independent variables with the dependent variable. If
there is an increase in Company (COM), Service (SRV), Reward Scheme (RSC)
and Trust (TRS), then Career option (CRO) will also increase. Judging from the
standardized coefficient, the most dominant variable in affecting Career option
(CRO) in sequence is Service (SRV) with value 0,359, then Trust (TRS) with
value 0,289, then Reward scheme (RSC) with value 0,229 and the last is
Company (COM) with a value of 0.042.
Table 4.21 Squared Multiple Correlation (R2)
Estimate
CRO ,669
Source: AMOS (2018)
From the R2 test results above, it shows that the estimated value of R2 is 0.669.
This indicates that the Career option (CRO) can be explained as much as 66.9%
by Company (COM), Service (SRV), Reward Scheme (RSC) and Trust (TRS)
variables while the remaining 33.1% is explained by other variables outside this
research model.
4.8.1 Hypotheses Testing
4.8.1.1 Influence of Company (COM) toward Career Option (CRO)
The first hypothesis to be tested is the Company (COM) influence towards Career
Option (CRO). The test conducted using statistical hypothesis as follows:
69
H0: There is no significant influence of Company towards Career Option
H1: There is significant influence of Company towards Career Option
Table 4.23 Influence of Company towards Career Option
Standardized Unstandardized (C.R.) P H1
0,042 0,029 0,457 0,648 Rejected
Source: AMOS (2018)
Based on the result above, it shows that the C.R value of Company variable
(COM) is 0,457 which is smaller than ttable value which is 1,96 and the p value of
0,648 which is higher than 0.05. Since the C.R value of Company is smaller than
ttable, and P > 0,05 then at error level of 5%, it is decided to accept H0 and reject
H1. Therefore, the first hypothesis is rejected. In other words, it can be concluded
that the Company has no significant influence towards Career Option.
According to the theory of Schein (1978) stated that if there is no good
cooperative relationship between the company and the individual then can be sure
the career path will get a barrier. Furthermore, based on the previous research by
Nga and Mun (2011) explained that the company has a positive influence towards
career option. And the result of this analysis has an opposite with the previous
research.
4.8.1.2 Influence of Service (SRV) towards Career Option (CRO)
The second hypothesis to be tested is the Service (SRV) influence towards Career
Option (CRO). The test conducted using statistical hypothesis as follows:
H0: There is no significant influence of Service towards Career Option
H2: There is significant influence of Service towards Career Option
70
Table 4.24 Influence of Service towards Career Option
Standardized Unstandardized (C.R.) P H2
0,359 0,257 2,556 0,011 Accepted
Source: AMOS (2018)
Based on the result above, it shows that the CR value of Service variable (SRV) is
2,556 which is higher than the ttable value which is 1,96 and the p value of 0,011
which is lower than 0.05. Since the CR value of is higher than ttable, and P < 0,05
then at error level of 5%, it is decided to accept H2 and reject H0. Therefore, the
second hypothesis is accepted. In other words, it can be concluded that Service
has significant influence towards Career Option.
According to the theory of Kotler and Keller (2009) service is any action or
performance which a company can give to an employee, which is basically
intangible and affects one's career. Furthermore, based on previous research by
Nga and Mun (2011) support that service has an influence of someone in choosing
their career. Moreover, other research by Koroth (2014) also support the fact that
service has an influence on job satisfaction in their MLM career.
4.8.1.3 Influence of Reward Scheme (RSC) towards Career Option (CRO)
The third hypothesis to be tested is the Reward Scheme (RSC) influence towards
Career Option (CRO). The test conducted using statistical hypothesis as follows:
H0: There is no significant influence of Reward Scheme towards Career Option
H3: There is significant influence of Reward Scheme towards Career Option
Table 4.25 Influence of Reward Scheme towards Career Option
Standardized Unstandardized (C.R.) P H3
0,164 0,229 2,117 0,034 Accepted
Source: AMOS (2018)
71
Based on the result above, it shows that the C.R value of Reward Scheme (RSC)
is 2,117 which is higher than the ttable value which is 1,96 and the p value of 0,032
which is lower than 0.05. Since the value of C.R value is higher than ttable, and P <
0,05 then at error level of 5%, it is decided to accept H3 and reject H0. Therefore,
the third hypothesis is accepted. In other words, it can be concluded that Reward
Scheme has significant influence towards Career Option.
According to the theory of Parson (1909) stated that one of career choice is based
on compensation which company give to their employer. Furthermore, based on
the previous research by Nga and Mun (2011) support that reward or
compensation has an influence towards career option.
4.8.1.4 Influence of Trust (TRS) towards Career option (CRO)
The forth hypothesis to be tested is the Trust (TRS) influence towards Career
Option (CRO). The test conducted using statistical hypothesis as follows:
H0: There is no significant influence of Trust towards Career Option
H4: There is significant influence of Trust towards Career Option
Table 4.26 Influence of Trust towards Career Option
Standardized Unstandardized (C.R.) P H4
0,289 0,246 3,444 0,000 Accepted
Source: AMOS (2018)
Based on the result above, it shows that the C.R value of Trust (TRS) is 3,444
which is higher than the ttable value which is 1,96 and the p value of 0,000 which is
lower than 0.05. Since the C.R value is higher than ttable, and P < 0,05 then at error
level of 5%, it is decided to accept H4 and reject H0. Therefore, the forth
hypothesis is accepted. In other words, it can be concluded that Trust has
significant influence towards Career Option.
72
According to the theory of Mayer (1995) stated that one factor that affects job
satisfaction is the factor of trust. It is shows that people will be excited and
motivated when they gain their trust and their ability to be recognized.
Furthermore, research by Hunnes, Kvaloy & Mohn (2007) support the fact that
trust is influence on career. Trust is important for perception of career according
to the result.
4.8.1.4 Influence of Agent (AGT) towards career option (CRO)
Factor 1 2 3 4 5
AG1 .537
AG2 .425
AG3 .507
According to the table above, it is indicates that agent variable does not form the
same factor. So, it is processed further by take out one by eliminate the factor
starting with the item which has the lowest value and in the same factor with the
lowest number of items.
According to the previous research by Nga and Mun (2011) stated that MLM
agent attributes have a negative influence on the willingness to take up MLM as a
career option.
4.8.1.5Demographic variable towards career option
Based on the table 4.18 shows that only on Monthly_Income factors that have a
significance value smaller than 0.05 which is 0.038 that indicates the career option
in each group Monthly_Income different from each other. While the factors of
Gender, Age, Occupation and Latest education have no significant differences in
each group of demographic factors. So it can be concluded that from 5 factor
demographic only Monthly_Income which have significant effect to career option.
73
According to the previous research by Nga and Mun (2011) stated that only
income level has a significant F-statistic at the p-value of 0.10. The other
demographic variable not have an influence on the willingness to take up MLM as
a career option. As such, H6 is supported only for perception of income.
74
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
In this chapter, the detail findings from this study will be discussed. Managerial
implication of both studies will draw, followed by the discussion about suggestion
for future research.
5.1 Conclusion
This research has the objective to analyze the influence of Paytren MLM and
agent attributes on willingness to undertake multilevel marketing as a career
option. After conducting analysis to achieve research objective, the are several
results obtained:
1. The Company has no significant influence towards Career Option. C.R value of
Company variable (COM) is 0,457 which is smaller than ttable value which is
1,96 and the p value of 0,648 which is higher than 0.05. And based on the
theory of Schein stated that if there is no good cooperative relationship
between the company and the individual then can be sure the career path will
get a barrier. Furthermore, based on the previous research explained that the
company has a positive influence towards career option. And the result of this
analysis has an opposite with the previous research.
2. Service has significant influence towards Career Option. The CR value of
Service variable (SRV) is 2,556 which is higher than the ttable value which is
1,96 and the p value of 0,011 which is lower than 0.05. And based on the
theory of Kotler and Keller service is any action or performance which a
company can give to an employee, which is basically intangible and affects
one's career. Furthermore, based on previous research support that service has
an influence of someone in choosing their career. Moreover, other research
also support the fact that service has an influence on job satisfaction in their
MLM career.
75
3. Reward Scheme has significant influence towards Career Option. that the C.R value
of Reward Scheme (RSC) is 2,117 which is higher than the ttable value which is
1,96 and the p value of 0,032 which is lower than 0.05. And according to the
theory of Parson stated that one of career choice is based on compensation
which company give to their employer. Furthermore, based on the previous
research support that reward or compensation has an influence towards career
option.
4. Trust has significant influence towards Career Option.The C.R value of Trust
(TRS) is 3,444 which is higher than the ttable value which is 1,96 and the p
value of 0,000 which is lower than 0.05. And according to the theory of Mayer
stated that one factor that affects job satisfaction is the factor of trust. It is
shows that people will be excited and motivated when they gain their trust and
their ability to be recognized. Furthermore, previous research support the fact
that trust is influence on career. Trust is important for perception of career
according to the result.
5. Agent towards career option indicates that agent variable does not form the
same factor. So, it is processed further by take out one by eliminate the factor
starting with the item which has the lowest value and in the same factor with
the lowest number of items. And according to the previous research stated that
MLM agent attributes have a negative influence on the willingness to take up
MLM as a career option.
6. In demographic variable towards career, only monthly_income factors that have
a significance value smaller than 0.05 which is 0.038 that indicates the career
option in each group Monthly_Income different from each other. While the
factors of Gender, Age, Occupation and Latest education have no significant
differences in each group of demographic factors. So it can be concluded that
from 5 factor demographic only Monthly_Income which have significant effect
to career option.
76
5.2 Recommendations
5.2.1 For Paytren Company
Based on the result of research, the researcher has found some factor that
influence the members to choose Paytren as their career option. Paytren MLM
must pay attention in the service, reward scheme, and trust among the agent of
MLM and improve the performance and quality of these factor to attract members
in Paytren MLM to consider and choose Paytren MLM as their career option. For
the service area, Paytren MLM should increase the service that they give to the
members to make they feel convenience in doing their business, such as increase
the training and seminar among the members. For the reward scheme, Paytren
company should develop their reward scheme to attract members to do more
prospect to achieve those rewards. And for the trust among agent, Paytren MLM
should increase the trust of the members by doing training, seminar or gathering
among members to know each other‟s. Those of factor is important to make
Paytren MLM chosen as a career option by a members.
5.2.2 For future researcher
For future research who want to use career option as the research, it is necessary
to do further research for career in Paytren MLM on other factors besides
company, service, reward scheme, trust and agent in this research, such as up line,
downline, distributor satisfaction, etc. Subsequent research also suggests
examining other variables related to career option by looking for other companies
and a wider population. So that will be obtained a comparison between different
variables and different samples to conduct research. This research can be used for
other research to understand the career option among MLM companies.
77
REFERENCES
Journals
Albaum, G., & Peterson, R. A. (2011). Multilevel (network) marketing: An
objective view. The Marketing Review, 11(4), 347-361.
doi:10.1362/146934711x13210328715902
Attri, R., & Chaturvedi, S. (2011). A study of consumer perceptions of the
products sold through multilevel marketing. Management Research
Journal, 5(4), 97-103. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1975576
Alnıaçık, Ü., Alnıaçık, E., Akçin, K., & Erat, S. (2012). Relationships Between
Career Motivation, Affective Commitment and Job Satisfaction.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 355-362.
doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1011
Beasley, J. (2012). Distinguishing Pyramid Schemes and Multilevel
Marketing (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from
https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/132131/Jennifer
%20Beasley%20summa%20CSOM%20sp12.pdf?sequence=1
Bobalca, C., & Soponaru, C. (2015). Is it direct selling a type of direct
marketing? arguments. Academia Brancusi Publisher, 2(1), 72-78.
Bothma, F. C. (2012). Work-based identity and work engagement as
potential antecedents of task performance and turnover intention:
Unravelling a complex relationship. SA Journal of Industrial
Psychology, 38(1), 1-17. doi:10.4102/sajip.v38i1.893
Cangur, S., & Ercan, I. (2015). Comparison of model fit indices used in structural
equation modeling under multivariate normality. Journal of Modern
Applied Statistical Methods, 14(1), 152-167.
78
Chaudhari, J., & Mistry, S. (2010). Multi level marketing: does it Lead to
exploitation of relationships? QUEST - Journal of Management and
Research, 1(2), 3-7. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2325308
Constantin, C. (2009). Multilevel marketing - a tool of relationship
marketing. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov, 2(51),
31-36.
Coughlan, A. (2012). FAQs on MLM companies. Financial and Data
Support of Herbalife Ltd, 1-7.
Dado, J., Petrovicova, J. T., Riznic, D., & Rajic, T. (2013). Linking service
quality and satisfaction to behavioural intentions in higher education
setting. Ekonomický časopis, 61(6), 578-596.
Epstein, A. (2010). Multi-level marketing and its brethren: the legal and
regulatory environment in the down economy. Atlantic Law Journal, 12,
91-121. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1685974
Farahmandian, S., Minavand, H., & Afshardost, M. (2013). Perceived service
quality and student satisfaction in higher education. IOSR Journal of
Business and Management, 12(4), 65-74. doi:10.9790/487x-1246574
Fejoh, J., & Vaniran, V. L. (2016). Impact of in-service training and staff
development on workers‟ job Performance and optimal productivity in
public secondary schools in Osun State, Nigeria. Journal of Education
and Practice , 7(33), 183-189.
Franco, W., & Perez, M. A. (2016). International expansion opportunities for
multi-level marketing via personal networks: an ethnographic study
79
from Colombia. International Journal of Business and Society,, 17(1),
28-46.
Girish, S. N., & Dipa, D. (2015). Multi-level marketing: comparative
perspective and indian dilemma. International Journal of Advanced
Research in Management and Social Sciences, 4(5), 105-123.
Retrieved from http://www.garph.co.uk/IJARMSS/May2015/9.pdf
Gorda, E. S., Lestari, N. E., & Astawa, N. D. (2016). Leadership, career
development, organizational culture, organizational commitment, and
employee performance in the public works department of Bali
province, Indonesia. International Journal of Economics, Commerce
and Management, 4(7), 195-212.
Gregor, B., & Wadlewski, A. A. (2013). Multilevel marketing as a business
model. marketing of scientific and research organizations, 1(7), 3-19.
Retrieved from DOI: 10.14611/minib.07.01.2013.09
Grimm, K. J., & Widaman, K. F. (2012). Construct Validity. APA Handbook of
Research Methods in Psychology, 1, 621-642. Retrieved from DOI:
10.1037/13619-033
Groß, C., & Vriens, D. (2017). The Role of the Distributor Network in the
Persistence of Legal and Ethical Problems of Multi-level Marketing
Companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-23. doi:10.1007/s10551-
017-3556-9
Guenzi, P., De Luca, L. M., & Spiro, R. (2016). The combined effect of
customer perceptions about a salesperson‟s adaptive selling and
80
selling orientation on customer trust in the salesperson: a contingency
perspective. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 31(4), 553-
564. doi:10.1108/jbim-02-2015-0037
Handoko, T.H. (2008) Pengermbangan karir dan iklim organisasi terhadap
kepuasan kerja pegawai
Hatchaleelaha, S., & Wongsurawat, W. (2016). Multilevel marketing and
entrepreneurship in Thailand. Journal of Research in Marketing and
Entrepreneurship, 18(1), 146-160. doi:10.1108/jrme-04-2015-0025
Herbig, P., & Yelkurm, R. (2008). A Review of the Multilevel Marketing
Phenomenon. Journal of Marketing Channels, 6(1), 17-33.
doi:10.1300/j049v06n01_02
Hiranpong, R., Decharin, P., & Thawesaengskulthai, N. (2016). Structural
equation modeling of a potentially successful person in network
marketing. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 37(1), 22-29.
doi:10.1016/j.kjss.2016.01.009
Hunnes, A., Kvaløy, O., & Mohn, K. (2011). An Empirical Study of
Performance Appraisal and Career Opportunities. International
Journal of Business and Management, 7(1).
doi:10.5539/ijbm.v7n1p22
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural Equation Modelling:
Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. The Electronic Journal of Business
Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60
81
Ilias, A., Rahman, R. A., & Razak, M. Z. (2009). Service Quality and Student
Satisfaction: A Case Study at Private Higher Education Institutions.
International Business Research, 1(3). doi:10.5539/ibr.v1n3p163
Juman, M., & Christopher, J. (2015). A study on direct selling business
(Amway India Ltd) in Kerala: A case study of Calicut district of
Kerala. International Research Journal of Engineering and
Technology (IRJET), 2(8), 1489-1500.
Kalra, S., Kondepudi, M., & Sridharan, A. (2016). Consumer attitude towards
network marketing in a global scenario. Intercontinental Journal of
Marketing Research Review, 4(12), 9-14.
Kayalar, M., & Ozmutaf, N. M. (2009). The effect of individual career
planning on job satisfaction: A comparative study on academic and
administrative staff. The Journal of Faculty of Economics and
Administrative Sciences, 14(1), 239-254.
Keep, W. W., & Nat, P. V. (2014). Multilevel marketing and pyramid schemes
in the United States. Journal of Historical Research in Marketing, 6(2),
188-210. doi:10.1108/jhrm-01-2014-0002
Kimberlin, C. L., & Winterstein, A. G. (2009). Validity and reliability of
measurement instruments used in research. American journal of health-
system pharmacy: AJHP: official journal of the American Society of
Health-System Pharmacists , 65 (23), 2276-84.
Kiyosaki, R. (2007). Why I recommend direct selling. Success From Home,
3(3), 100-104.
82
Koroth, A. A. (2014). Antecedents of distributor turnover in multilevel
marketing. Indian Journal of Commerce & Management Studies, 5(1),
62-69.
Koroth, A. A., & Sarada, A. K. (2012). Significance of relationship in multilevel
marketing and its effect on business outcome. IOSR Journal of Business
and Management (IOSRJBM), 3(6), 26-36. Retrieved from DOI:
10.9790/487X-0362636
Krige, D. (2012). Field of dreams, field of schemes: Ponzi scheme and
multilevel marketing in South Africa. Africa, 82(01), 69-92.
doi:10.1017/s0001972011000738
Laucereno, S. F. (2017, October 6). PayTren Dibekukan BI, Yusuf Mansur:
Kami Sedang Ajukan Izin. Retrieved from
https://finance.detik.com/moneter/3673922/paytren-dibekukan-bi-yusuf-
mansur-kami-sedang-ajukan-izin
Lee, K., Lau, T., & Loi, K. (2016). Driving Distributors’ Satisfaction in
Multilevel Marketing (MLM) Companies. International Journal of
Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6(2), 105-122.
doi:10.6007/ijarbss/v6-i2/2015
Lee, K., & Loi, K. (2016). Towards Satisfying Distributors in Multilevel
Marketing Companies. International Journal Of Management and
Applied Research, 3(1), 48-64. doi:10.18646/2056.31.16-004
Lu, C., Berchoux, C., Marek, M. W., & Chen, B. (2015). Service quality and
customer satisfaction: qualitative research implications for luxury
83
hotels. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality
Research, 9(2), 168-182. doi:10.1108/ijcthr-10-2014-0087
Luca, N. (2011). Multilevel marketing: at the crossroads of economy and
religion. The Economics of Religion: Anthropological Approaches
(Research in Economic Anthropology), 31, 217-239. Retrieved from
ISSN: 0190-1281/10.1108/S0190-1281(2011)0000031012
Makni, V. (2014). Direct sales and network marketing:dynamics, structure,
and tendencies in a global aspect. Journal of University of Economics,
(2), 15-28.
Mansor, M. F., Borhannudin, S. N., & Yusuf, B. N. (2012). The effect of
rewards towards job performance among chemical-based employees.
International Journal of Business and Management Tomorrow, 2(12),
1-11.
Mayastinasari, V. (2013). The effect of reward and job satisfaction on the
police personnel performance in the Riau police headquarters. Journal
of Economics, Business, and Accountancy | Ventura, 16(3), 409-422.
doi:10.14414/jebav.v16i3.221
Meral, Y., Yashoglu, M., & Semercioz, F. (2016). Effects of Trust on Job
Satisfaction and Mediatory Role of New Identification between Trust
and Job Satisfaction in Mergers. International Journal of Managerial
Studies and Research, 4(5), 54-67. doi:10.20431/2349-0349.0405007
84
Nazeer, S., Zahid, M., & Azeem, M. F. (2014). Internal service quality and job
performance: does job satisfaction mediate? Journal of Human
Resources Management and Labor Studies, 2(1), 41-65.
Nga, K.H., & Mun, W. (2011). The influence of MLM companies and agent
attributes on the willingness to undertake multilevel marketing as a career
option among youth. Journal of Research in Interactive
Odunayo, A., Ayodeji, A., & Olaniyi, O. (2014). The Influence of career
commitment on organizational commitment among selected bankers
in Lagos Metropolis, Nigeria. European Journal of Business and
Management , 6(39), 36-41.
Okeke, R. C., & Nwankpa, L. O. (2017). The accounting fundamentals of
multilevel marketing, income security and the poverty challenge in
Nigeria. World Scientific News, 77(2), 281-297.
Osibanjo, Oyewunmi, & Ojo. (2014). Career development as a determinant of
organizational growth: modelling the relationship between these
constructs in the Nigerian banking industry. American International
Journal of Social Science, 3(7), 67-76.
Pazzaglia, A. M., Stafford, E. T., & Rodriguez, S. M. (2016). Survey methods for
educators: Selecting samples and administering surveys (IES-12-C-0009).
Retrieved from Education Development Center, Inc. website:
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED567752.pdf
Pedrood, N., Ahmadi, H., & Charafeddine, H. A. (2008). Systematic profitability
analysis of binary network marketing organizations. Direct Marketing:
An International Journal, 2(2), 81-96. doi:10.1108/17505930810881743
85
Poon, P., Albaum, G., & Shiu‐Fai Chan, P. (2012). Managing trust in direct
selling relationships. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 30(5), 588-
603. doi:10.1108/02634501211251070
Pratistha. (2017). A conceptual evaluation of traditional and network
marketing. XVIII Annual International Conference Proceedings, 237-
244.
Quansah, F. (2017). The Use Of Cronbach Alpha Reliability Estimate In
Research Among Students In Public Universities In Ghana. African
Journal of Teacher Education, 6(1), 56-64.
doi:10.21083/ajote.v6i1.3970
Reed, P., & Wu, Y. (2012). Logistic regression for risk factor modelling in
stuttering research. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 38, 88-101.
Rezvani, M., Ghahramani, S., & Haddadi, R. (2017). Network marketing
strategies in sale and marketing products based on advanced technology
in micro-enterprises. International Journal of Trade, Economics and
Finance, 8(1), 32-37. doi:10.18178/ijtef.2017.8.1.535
Salciuviene, L., Reardon, J., & Auruskeviciene, V. (2011). Antecedents of
performance of multi‐level channels in transitional economies. Baltic
Journal of Management, 6(1), 89-104.
doi:10.1108/17465261111100914
Saleem, S., & Amin, S. (2013). The Impact of Organizational Support for
Career Development and Supervisory Support on Employee
86
Performance: An Empirical Study from Pakistani Academic Sector.
European Journal of Business and Management , 5(5), 194-207.
Sardjono, W. (2013). Using Factor Analysis to Evaluate e- Commerce of Airline
Industry in Indonesia. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences ,,
7 (11), 530-536.
Sarwar, M. Z., Abbasi, K. S., & Pervaiz, S. (2012). The effect of customer
trust on customer loyalty and customer retention: A moderating role
of cause related marketing. Global Journal of Management and
Business Research, 12(6), 26-36.
Siddiqi, N., & Kharshiing, K. D. (2015). Influence of organizational trust on
job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Abhigyan, 53-64.
Siddiqui, K. (2013). Heuristics for Sample Size Determination in Multivariate
Statistical Techniques. World Applied Sciences Journal, 27(2), 285-287.
Retrieved from DOI: 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.27.02.889
Sizovaite, I., & Paschaloudis, D. (2011). Social networking applications in
Multi-level Marketing business. MIBES 2011 – Oral, 360-371.
Retrieved from http://mibes.teilar.gr/proceedings/2011/oral/27.pdf
Trivellas, P., Kakkos, N., Blanas, N., & Santouridis, I. (2015). The Impact of
Career Satisfaction on Job Performance in Accounting Firms. The
Mediating Effect of General Competencies. Procedia Economics and
Finance, 33, 468-476. doi:10.1016/s2212-5671(15)01730-x
87
Tyre, T. A., Myer, G., Lazo, A., & Waters, R. (2016). Network marketing
essence of success: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Business
and Management Research Journal, 6(4), 46-73. Retrieved from `
Vahidi, T. (2016). An examination on age groups and network marketing: the
opportunities and challenges. Research & Reviews: Journal of Social
Sciences, 2(2), 1-4.
Yen, Y. J., Liang, C. M., & Chieh, C. Y. (2008). The study of direct selling
management strategies: an example of the Avon cosmetics company
in Taiwan. Journal of International Management Studies, 214-227.
Zaidi, F. B., & Iqbal, S. (2012). Impact of career selection on job satisfaction
in the service industry of Pakistan. African Journal of Business
Management, 6(9), 3384-3401. doi:10.5897/ajbm11.1708
Books
Birks, D. F., & Malhotra, N. K. (2006). Marketing Research: An Applied
Approach (2nd ed.). European: Financial Times/Prentice Hall 2006
Bowen, N. K., & Guo, S. (2012). Structural equation modeling. Oxford, NC:
Oxford University Press.
Cooper, Donald R, and Pamela S Schindler. Business Research Method. eleventh edition. Mc Graw-Hill/irwin, 2011.
Newbold, Paul, William L Carlson, and Betty Thorne. Statistics for Business and Economics. seventh edition. Edited by Sally Yagan. Vol. 1. 2006.
Sujarweni, V Wiratna. Metodologi penelitian bisnis dan ekonomi. Yogyakarta: PUSTAKABARUPRESS, 2015.
Suprianto, J. (2001). Statistik: Teori dan aplikasi. Jakarta, ID: Penerbit Erlangga.
88
Tharenou, P., Donohue, R., & Cooper, B. (2007). Management Research Method.
USA: Cambridge University Press.
Website
Consulting, S. R. (2011, May 22). What’s next in Multi-level Marketing.
Retrieved fromhttps://www.spireresearch.com/wp-
content/uploads/2012/03/spire-e-journal-q2-2011-multi-level-
marketing.pdf
Detik.com (2017, December 13). Duet dengan Grab, Bagaimana Soal Izin
PayTren Yusuf Mansur di BI? Retrieved from
https://finance.detik.com/moneter/d-3768264/duet-dengan-grab-
bagaimana-soal-izin-paytren-yusuf-mansur-di-bi
Detik.com (2017, October 6). PayTren Dibekukan BI, Yusuf Mansur: Kami
Sedang Ajukan Izin. Retrieved from
https://finance.detik.com/moneter/3673922/paytren-dibekukan-bi-yusuf-
mansur-kami-sedang-ajukan-izin
DeFranzo, S. E. (2017, september 2017). Difference between qualitative and
quantitative research. Retrieved from
https://www.snapsurveys.com/blog/qualitative-vs-quantitative-research/
Kompas.com (2009, January 15). Kiat Memilih Bisnis MLM - Kompas.com.
Retrieved from
http://nasional.kompas.com/read/2009/01/15/13145569/kiat.memilih.bisni
s.mlm
Kompas.com (2014, May 2). Bisnis VSI Milik Yusuf Mansur Dinilai Ilegal-
Kompas.com.Retrieved from
http://ekonomi.kompas.com/read/2014/05/02/1536262/Bisnis.VSI.Milik.
Yusuf.Mansur.Dinilai.Ilegal
89
Kontan.co.id. (2012, May 29). Bisnis MLM bisa mekar 10% tahun ini. Retrieved
from http://industri.kontan.co.id/news/bisnis-mlm-bisa-mekar-10-
tahun-ini
Labaree, R. (2017, december 18). Research method quantitative. Retrieved from
https://apus.libguides.com/research_methods_guide/research_methods_qu
antitative
Lancaster University management school. (2016, 8 28). Retrieved 1 26, 2018,
from https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/media/lancaster-university/content-
assets/documents/learning-
skills/quantitativevqualitativeresearchanswers.pdf
Martz, E. (2015, December 3). What Can You Say When Your P-Value is Greater
Than 0.05. Retrieved from http://blog.minitab.com/blog/understanding-
statistics/what-can-you-say-when-your-p-value-is-greater-than-005
Merdeka.com (2016, April 18). Indonesia miliki potensi besar untuk bisnis
MLM merdeka.com. Retrieved January 23, 2018, from
https://www.merdeka.com/uang/indonesia-miliki-potensi-besar-untuk-
bisnis-mlm.html
Republika.com (2017, June 10). Bisnis MLM Kerap Dicap Negatif, Apa
Penyebabnya? | Republika Online. Retrieved from
http://www.republika.co.id/berita/ekonomi/keuangan/17/06/10/orb3uo280
-bisnis-mlm-kerap-dicap-negatif-apa-penyebabnya
Steyn, P. (2016, May 13). Data Assumption: Multicollinearity | IntroSpective
Mode. Retrieved from http://www.introspective-mode.org/assumption-
multicollinearity/
90
APPENDIX
Questionnaire
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
Raw Data
COMPANY
SERVIC
E
REWARD
SCHEME
AGEN
T
TRUS
T CAREER
3 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 3 5 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
3 4 3 3 2 4 3 5 5 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 5 5 4 4 5 3
3 2 2 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
101
3 5 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 5 5 4 4 4 4
3 4 4 3 3 4 3 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 2 4 5 5 3 4 3 3
3 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 4 3 2 2 2 3 2
4 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 5 3 4 3 4 4 5 5 5 4 4 3
5 4 2 2 5 4 5 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 2 4 4 5 3 3 4 4
4 3 4 4 4 3 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 5 4 5 3 5 5 5 4 4 4 5
4 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 3 4 4 3 4 4 3 3 2 3 4 3 5 4 4 3 4
5 5 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 5 3 3 3 3
4 5 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 5 4 3 3 4 4 5 5 4 4 5 3
3 5 4 4 3 4 5 4 4 4 5 3 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 3 4 5 5
5 5 3 3 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 5 3 4 5 4
3 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 1 3 2 1 3 4 1 1 2 2 3 2 4 2 3 2 2
4 4 3 5 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 5 3 3 3 2 3 4 5 3 3 4 5
4 4 3 3 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 5 5 4 3 4 4
4 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 5 4 5 3 4 3 2 4 5 5 3 4 5 4
4 5 3 3 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 5 4 3 5 4 4
4 4 4 4 4 4 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 2 3 4 2 2 4 3 4 3 3 2 4
4 4 4 3 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 5 5 4 3 4 4
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5
4 5 3 4 5 4 1 4 4 5 3 4 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 5 5 3 3 4 3
5 5 4 3 4 4 5 3 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 5 4 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 4
5 4 3 5 4 4 4 4 4 2 3 4 3 2 4 4 4 2 4 5 4 2 2 5 4
5 5 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 5 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
5 5 4 4 5 3 3 5 4 3 3 4 4 3 3 5 4 2 4 4 4 4 3 4 5
5 5 4 4 4 4 3 5 3 3 4 4 3 4 3 4 2 3 4 4 4 3 5 4 3
5 5 5 4 4 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 2 4 3 4 4 3 3 4
5 5 4 4 5 3 3 3 4 4 3 4 3 2 4 4 3 2 4 4 3 4 4 4 3
5 4 3 4 5 5 4 4 5 5 4 5 4 5 4 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5
5 5 3 4 5 4 2 3 5 4 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4
5 4 5 3 4 5 4 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 3 5 5 5 5 5
5 5 4 4 4 5 3 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 4
4 5 4 5 4 5 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
4 4 5 4 5 5 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 2 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4
4 5 5 5 5 4 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 4 4
5 5 5 4 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 5 3 5 4 5 5 3
2 4 2 3 2 2 3 4 1 1 2 2 2 1 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 4
5 5 4 5 5 5 2 4 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 3 5 5 4 4
3 2 3 2 5 1 1 3 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 4 3 3 2 2 1 2 2 4 2
5 5 5 5 5 5 2 2 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 3
4 4 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 3 4 4
5 4 4 4 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 5 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5
5 4 4 4 3 4 5 4 3 5 4 5 4 5 3 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5
4 4 1 4 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 5
5 5 5 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 5 4
4 4 3 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 4
4 4 5 5 4 5 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 5 3 3 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 3 4
2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 3 1 2 2 1 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2
4 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 3 3 4 3 4 3 3 4 5 3 4 4 4 4 3 3
102
4 3 3 4 3 3 4 4 3 3 4 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4
5 5 5 5 5 4 4 5 5 4 5 3 5 5 4 4 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 5 5
4 3 3 4 3 3 2 2 3 2 3 1 3 2 2 3 3 3 2 4 2 3 3 2 2
5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 5 5 4 5 4 4 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 4
4 4 5 5 3 5 3 4 5 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
4 4 5 5 3 5 5 3 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 5 3 5 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
3 4 5 5 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 3 4 5 5
4 4 4 3 3 4 4 3 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 3 5 5 5 4 3 3 4 4 4
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
2 2 2 2 3 3 1 1 4 4 2 3 2 3 3 2 4 4 3 3 3 3 2 3 3
3 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 4 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4
4 3 3 3 4 4 3 4 2 3 3 3 3 4 3 2 3 3 3 4 2 4 3 3 3
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 3 5 5 5
4 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 2 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3
5 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5
2 4 1 5 5 3 1 5 4 1 3 2 3 2 3 3 1 1 1 4 1 1 3 4 4
3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
5 5 4 3 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 3 3 5 4 4 4 3 4 5 4 4
3 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 2 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
4 4 4 4 4 4 5 3 5 3 4 4 4 5 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
5 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 4
4 3 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4
5 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 5 4
5 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 1 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
4 3 2 5 3 4 2 5 4 2 3 4 3 4 3 2 5 4 5 4 1 3 4 5 4
2 2 3 2 3 3 2 4 4 2 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
4 4 3 4 4 3 3 3 2 4 3 3 3 4 2 2 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3
4 4 1 1 4 4 4 3 2 4 4 2 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 5 4 3 3 3 3
4 4 5 4 3 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 1 2 3 2 3 3 4 2 2 3 4
4 3 2 4 4 5 3 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 3 4 4 3 4 4 5 5
5 5 5 5 5 5 1 4 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 4 3 3 3 3 4 2 2 3 3
3 2 2 3 3 4 4 3 3 4 3 3 4 4 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 4 3 4 5
5 5 5 5 5 4 5 2 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4
5 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 4 5 3 4 2 5 4 5 5 5 4
5 5 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 5 5
4 5 3 5 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 5
3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
5 5 4 5 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 5 5 5 5 5 4
5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 5 5
5 2 2 5 4 3 2 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 4 4 5
4 4 3 4 3 3 2 4 3 4 3 3 4 2 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 4
4 4 4 4 4 4 2 4 4 3 3 3 3 4 2 3 3 4 3 4 3 3 4 3 3
4 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 1 4 3 3 3 2 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
3 2 2 3 4 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 3 4 4 4 3 5 2 5 5 4 4
5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 4 3 4 4 5 4 4 4 5 4 3 3
103
3 3 2 4 4 2 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 2 5 3 4 4 4 4
3 2 3 3 4 4 2 3 3 2 2 3 2 4 2 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 3
5 5 3 5 4 5 5 3 3 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5
5 4 3 4 3 3 5 3 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 3 4 4
4 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 2 4 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3
3 3 2 3 3 1 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 3 3
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
3 2 3 3 4 4 2 2 3 4 3 3 3 2 3 3 4 3 3 4 3 2 2 3 3
2 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 1
4 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 2 3 4 4
1 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
4 3 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 3 4 5 3 2 4 4 4 5 3 3 3 3 5
4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
5 5 5 5 5 5 3 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 3 5 5 5 5 3 4 4 5 5 5
3 3 3 4 4 3 1 3 3 4 2 4 3 2 2 4 2 2 1 3 2 2 2 4 4
4 4 4 5 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 4 3 4 5 4 4 4 4
4 4 5 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 2 3 2 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 2 4 2 2 3
4 3 2 4 4 3 4 3 5 4 5 5 5 5 3 4 3 4 4 5 4 5 5 5 5
4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 4 3 4 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 4
3 2 2 4 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 4 3 4 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 4 3 5 4
5 3 5 5 3 3 5 5 5 3 5 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 4 5 5 5
4 5 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 5
4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
4 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 5
4 5 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4
3 3 4 3 3 2 4 3 2 3 4 2 2 4 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 4 3
5 4 5 5 3 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 3 3 4 5 4 4 5 4 5 5 4 5
4 4 3 4 4 4 1 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4
5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 5 3 4 3
5 4 3 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 5 3 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 4 4 4
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
4 2 2 5 4 5 2 4 2 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 2 5 5 5
4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 5 4 3 4 3 3 4 4 5 4 5 2 3
4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 5 4 3 4 3 3 4 4 5 4 5 2 3
4 3 3 4 2 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 3
4 3 3 4 2 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 3
4 4 2 2 3 5 5 3 3 2 5 4 5 5 5 3 3 3 5 4 4 3 3 5 5
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
3 3 1 2 2 4 3 3 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3
4 5 5 4 3 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 4 4 5 5 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 4
5 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 3 5 5 3 5 2 5 5 5 5 3 3 5 5 5 5
3 2 1 5 5 3 1 4 1 5 1 2 3 2 3 5 3 1 1 5 1 1 3 3 3
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5
3 3 3 4 5 4 5 3 3 4 3 3 4 5 3 3 4 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5
5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
3 2 3 3 4 3 2 4 4 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 4
104
3 2 3 3 4 3 2 4 4 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 4
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
4 3 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 2 2 2 2 2 3 4 4 3 3 4
4 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 5
4 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 5
4 5 4 4 3 3 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 5 4 4 4 3 4 3 3 5 4 3 3
4 2 3 3 4 3 2 3 1 3 2 2 3 3 2 3 2 2 3 3 2 4 3 4 3
5 5 5 5 4 4 5 4 4 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
4 3 3 5 4 5 5 4 4 5 4 3 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 5 5 5 5
4 3 3 5 4 5 5 4 4 5 4 3 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 5 5 5 5
4 4 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 3
4 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4
4 3 3 4 4 3 3 4 3 4 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 4
4 4 4 5 5 3 4 4 4 5 4 4 3 2 3 4 4 5 3 3 4 4 4 4 3
5 5 3 5 4 5 5 3 3 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5
3 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3
3 2 2 3 2 2 3 2 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 5 3 5 5 5 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5
4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 5 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 4 3 4 4
3 3 3 5 4 4 3 4 5 5 5 4 4 5 4 5 1 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 1
4 1 3 4 5 4 4 5 5 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 1 4 4 4 4
4 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 5 5 5
4 3 3 3 4 4 2 3 3 4 4 3 4 4 3 2 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3
5 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 3 5 4 5 4 5 3 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5
2 4 1 5 5 3 1 4 4 5 1 2 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 3 4 4
3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
5 5 4 3 5 4 2 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 3 4 5 4 4
3 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 2 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3
5 5 5 5 5 4 3 4 4 5 5 4 5 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4
5 4 4 5 5 5 5 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 4 3 4 2 5 4 5 5 5 4
5 5 5 4 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 5 5
5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 5 5
5 2 2 5 4 3 3 3 4 4 3 4 3 5 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 4 4 5
4 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 4 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
3 2 2 3 4 2 2 2 4 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 4 4 3 5 2 5 5 4 4
3 2 3 3 4 4 2 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 3
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
3 2 3 3 4 4 2 2 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 4 3 2 2 3 3
2 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 1
4 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 5 4 3 4 3 3 4 4 3 3 2 3 4 4
1 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 4 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
5 5 5 5 5 5 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 4 5 5 5 3 4 4 5 5 5
4 5 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 5
4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
105
4 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 5
4 4 2 2 3 5 5 3 3 2 5 4 5 5 5 3 3 3 5 4 4 3 3 5 5
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
3 3 1 2 2 4 3 3 2 2 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3
4 5 5 4 3 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 4 4 5 5 4 4 5 4 5 4 4 4 4
5 5 5 5 4 4 5 4 4 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
4 3 3 5 4 5 5 4 4 5 4 3 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 5 5 5 5
4 3 3 5 4 5 5 4 4 5 4 3 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 5 5 5 5
4 4 5 5 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 3
3 5 4 4 5 5 5 4 3 4 3 4 5 5 4 5 3 2 3 5 5 5 5 4 4
4 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 3 5 3 3 3 3 3 5 4 3 2 3 3
3 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 3 4 4 4
5 5 4 4 5 3 4 4 3 2 2 3 2 5 3 4 3 3 4 5 5 4 4 5 3
5 5 5 5 5 5 4 3 3 3 4 3 3 1 3 3 2 2 3 5 5 5 5 5 5
5 5 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 3 4 3 3 4 5 5 4 4 4 4
5 4 3 4 5 5 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 2 4 4 3 2 4 5 4 3 4 5 5
4 5 3 4 5 4 4 4 5 4 3 4 4 2 2 4 3 3 4 4 5 3 4 5 4
2 4 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 1 2 3 4 2 4 2 3 2 2
5 4 3 5 4 4 5 5 4 4 2 4 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 5 4 3 5 4 4
3 4 3 3 2 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 2 2 3 2 2 4 3 4 3 3 2 4
5 5 4 3 4 4 5 3 5 3 4 4 4 2 2 4 3 3 4 5 5 4 3 4 4
5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 5 2 1 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5
4 4 4 3 4 5 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 2 4 4 4 2 4 4 4 4 3 4 5
4 4 3 5 4 3 4 5 4 5 3 5 5 3 3 4 2 3 4 4 4 3 5 4 3
3 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 4 2 3 4 3 2 4 3 4 4 3 3 4
4 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 2 4 4 4 4 1 3 4 3 2 4 4 3 4 4 4 3
4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 4
4 4 3 3 5 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
3 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 4 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 4
4 4 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 4 3 5 5 4 4
3 2 3 2 5 1 2 2 3 2 3 4 3 5 1 2 3 3 2 2 1 2 2 4 2
5 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5
5 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5
4 4 1 4 5 5 1 5 4 1 2 4 2 5 3 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 5
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
3 4 5 5 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 5 3 4 4 4 4 5 4 3 4 5 5
4 4 4 3 3 4 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 3 3 4 4 4
4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 1 4 4 2 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
4 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 2 4 4 4 4 1 3 4 3 2 4 4 3 4 4 4 3
4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 4
4 4 3 3 5 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
3 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 4 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 4
4 4 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 4 3 5 5 4 4
3 2 3 2 5 1 2 2 3 2 3 4 3 5 1 2 3 3 2 2 1 2 2 4 2
5 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5
5 5 4 4 5 3 4 4 3 2 2 3 2 5 3 4 3 3 4 5 5 4 4 5 3
5 5 5 5 5 5 4 3 3 3 4 3 3 1 3 3 2 2 3 5 5 5 5 5 5
5 5 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 3 4 3 3 4 5 5 4 4 4 4
106
5 5 3 4 3 3 5 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 5 5 3 4 3 3
3 2 2 2 3 2 2 4 4 2 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 2 2 2 3 2
3 5 4 4 3 4 2 2 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 4 5 3 5 3 5 4 4 3 4
3 5 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 2 4 4 4 2 3 3 2 2 3 3 5 3 3 3 3
5 5 4 4 5 3 5 5 5 5 3 3 4 2 3 4 3 2 4 5 5 4 4 5 3
5 4 3 4 5 5 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 2 4 4 3 2 4 5 4 3 4 5 5
4 5 3 4 5 4 4 4 5 4 3 4 4 2 2 4 3 3 4 4 5 3 4 5 4
Amos Result
Regression Weight
Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label
CRO <--- COM ,029 ,063 ,457 ,648 par_9
CRO <--- SRV ,257 ,100 2,556 ,011 par_10
CRO <--- RSC ,164 ,077 2,117 ,034 par_11
CRO <--- TRS ,246 ,071 3,444 *** par_12
Standardized Regression Weight
Estimate
CRO <--- COM ,042
CRO <--- SRV ,359
CRO <--- RSC ,229
CRO <--- TRS ,289
Squared Multiple Correlations (R2)
Estimate
CRO ,669
Company toward career
Standardized Unstandardized (C.R.) P H1
0,042 0,029 0,457 0,648 Rejected
Service toward career
107
Standardized Unstandardized (C.R.) P H2
0,359 0,257 2,556 0,011 Accepted
Reward scheme toward career
Standardized Unstandardized (C.R.) P H3
0,164 0,229 2,117 0,034 Accepted
Trust toward career
Standardized Unstandardized (C.R.) P H4
0,289 0,246 3,444 0,000 Accepted
Evaluation of Fit Indexes Structural Model
Index Fit Result Recommended Value Model Evaluation
Chi-Square 122,407
Probability 0,000 > 0,05
Chi-Square/DF 2,226 < 2 Marginal fit
GFI 0,931 > 0,90 Good fit
RMSEA 0,070 < 0,08 Good fit
AGFI 0,886 > 0,90 Marginal fit
TLI 0,950 > 0,90 Good fit
CFI 0,965 > 0,90 Good fit
RMR 0,039 < 0,08 Good fit