Upload
simon-jones
View
221
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
1/35
1
The matrix of leadership: location, socialorder and authority in early Christianity
By Simon Jones
All sorts of gatherings were called in the first century voluntary
associations, religious groups, even riotous assemblies (Acts 19:39-41)! For this
reason scholars have debated how the early followers of Jesus were organised
and led
In this paper we will review that debate, paying special attention to the
development of leadership language into the Second Century. In particular we
will focus on what our extant sources tell us about the way leadership in the
movement emerged in a complex matrix of social order, location and competing
authority claims.
Locating the Jesus movement in society
The earliest community in Acts was a gathering of mainly Jewish people and
god-fearers who met to pray and learn so they resembled a synagogue and
maybe the synagogue gave them a pattern to follow. They were also in
Jerusalem so they continued to go to the temple for prayers and worship (Acts
42-47, 3:1; 4:32-37; 5:12).
This has led James Burtchaell to propose that 'there is an antecedent likelihood
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
2/35
2
that the first Christians, being Jews, organised themselves in the familiar and
conventional ways of the synagogue.'1
But as the movement spread out from Jerusalem and began to take root in the
cities around the eastern end of the empire, it is much less clear what kind of
animal it is. Scholars have argued that the earliest communities modelled
themselves loosely on, variously, philosophical schools, voluntary associations,
even mystery religions, as well as the synagogue.2 The problem with this
approach is that it assumes that each of these types of organisation had
recognisable and uniform structures that differentiated them from other types of
organisation across the empire. But this is not the case. For example, Ascough
points out that the evidence from the first century C.E. suggests that Jews met in
private houses on the Sabbath for meetings focused on personal purity and
prayer, and they probably shared a meal together.3 But this could describe any
gathering in the empire from a voluntary society established by artisans to ensure
they get a decent burial to a philosophical school meeting to discuss the latest
ideas.
Indeed Smith has argued that banquets in the ancient world followed a certain
pattern and that almost every group that met to eat followed that pattern which
makes it very difficult to argue that because the early followers of Jesus eat a
1 James T Burtchaell From Synagogue to Church: Public services and offices in the earliest Christian
communities (Cambridge 1992) p2742
A good introduction to the debate is found in Richard S Ascough What are they saying about the
formation of Pauline Churches (New York: Paulist Press 1998)3 Ascough op cit p12
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
3/35
3
meal when they came together, they must have been a particular kind of
organisation. Indeed, they might just have been a group of friends gathering for a
semi-formal social organisation.4
The language that the New Testament writers used to describe their gatherings
doesnt help us to pinpoint what kind of communities they were. Terms that later
because the norm for describing the followers of Jesus notably church and
Christian are surprisingly thin on the ground in the canon.
Paul nearly always referred to the recipients of his letters as the holy
ones or saints (for example Romans 1:7, 1 Corinthians 1:2). He occasionally
refers to churches (almost never in the singular)5 but never spoke of the followers
of Jesus as Christians ().
Indeed this term only appears twice in Acts 11:26 and 26:28. It is a Latin term.
Edwin Judge comments: The Greek-speaking synagogues in Rome used the
Greek suffix -esioi in their names. The suffix ianus [the Latin rendering of
] constitutes a political comment. It was not used of the followers of a
god. It classifies people as partisans of a political or military leader and is mildly
4 Dennis E Smith From Symposium to Eucharist: The Banquet in the Early Christian World (Minneapolis:
Fortress 2003)5 1 Thessalonians 1:1 has in the singular but this could be that there was only one small group of
disciples gathered in a workshop, possibly that belonging to Jason. See Richard Ascough The
Thessalonian Christian Community as a Professional Voluntary Association JBL 119/2 (2000) p311-328..
1 Corinthians 1:2 also refers to in the singular, but see Romans 16:23 where Paul makes
reference to Gaius offering hospitality to the whole church; but it is by no means certain that this meant hecould host a formal gathering of all the Christians in the city and it seems likely that there were several
household gatherings in Corinth at the time Paul wrote..
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
4/35
4
contemptuous.6
He adds that the term could have arisen from the question posed for Romans
over the political loyalty of the followers of Christ.7 It's possible that what Agrippa
is taking exception to in Acts 26:28 is not Paul trying to persuade him of a
religious or philosophical view, but his trying to get him to adopt a political stance.
Tacitus tells us that when Nero was looking for scapegoats for the fire in Rome in
the early 60s, his gaze fell 'on a class of men whom the crowd styled Christians.' 8
The only other occurrence of the term in the NT is in 1 Peter 4:16 in the context
of persecution possibly by the Roman authorities, certainly by the neighbours of
the followers of Jesus. Peter is possibly picking up a term of abuse used by
outsiders of the church. David Horrell suggests that the context in which the
word appears in 1 Peter is highly significant for understanding the
origin and importance of the term in the history of early Christianity.9
The context is clearly one of suffering (Peter refers to the fiery trial in 4:12) that
comes from outside the community. It is likely that the term is used by those
opposed to the followers of Jesus for reasons that Peter doesnt specify though
he does stress that his hearers should not be insulted or prosecuted for criminal
6 E. A. Judge Judaism and the Rise of Christianity Tyn Bul 45.2, 1994 p363 cited in Bruce Winter Roman
Law and Society in Romans 12-15 in Peter Oakes (ed)Rome in the Bible and the Early Church (Carlisle/
Grand Rapids: Paternoster/Baker 2002 p707 Judge ibid8
Winter op cit p709 David G Horrell The label : 1 Peter 4:16 and the Formation of Christian Identity JBL 126.2
2007 p361-381. The quotes comes from p369
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
5/35
5
behaviour (4:15).
It seems that the communities Peter is writing to were facing suffering simply for
being followers of Jesus or, as their neighbours called then, Christians. In the
well-known correspondence between Pliny, Governor of the area Peter is writing
to, and the Emperor Trajan, similar language is used.
Seeking confirmation that he acting correctly, Pliny writes:
In the case of those who were denounced to me as Christians, I have
observed the following procedure: I interrogated these as to whether they
were Christians; those who confessed I interrogated a second and a third
time, threatening them with punishment; those who persisted I ordered
executed. For I had no doubt that, whatever the nature of their creed,
stubbornness and inflexible obstinacy surely deserve to be punished.
There were others possessed of the same folly; but because they were
Roman citizens, I signed an order for them to be transferred to Rome.10
Trajan relied:
You observed proper procedure, my dear Pliny, in sifting the cases of
those who had been denounced to you as Christians. For it is not possible
to lay down any general rule to serve as a kind of fixed standard. They are
10 Betty Radice (ed) The Letters of the Younger Pliny (London Penguin 19692 ) Book ten, letter 96, p293
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
6/35
6
not to be sought out; if they are denounced and proved guilty, they are to
be punished, with this reservation, that whoever denies that he is a
Christian and really proves it--that is, by worshiping our gods--even though
he was under suspicion in the past, shall obtain pardon through
repentance. But anonymously posted accusations ought to have no place
in any prosecution. For this is both a dangerous kind of precedent and out
of keeping with the spirit of our age. 11
It is clear from this exchange that by the start of the second century, the followers
of Jesus were routinely called Christians by outsiders. Horrell points out that at
about the same time, some of those followers of Jesus were beginning to adopt
the label as a badge of honour, most notably, Ignatius of Antioch.12
The roots of Roman suspicions about a foreign and new movement such as that
represented by what they called the Christians lie more than a century earlier
than Plinys correspondence with his Emperor. Trajan spoke for most Romans
when he said:
When people gather together for a common purpose whatever name we
may give them and whatever function we may assign them they soon
become political groups.13
11Ibid book ten, letter 97, p295
12 Horrell Op Cit p380; Ign Magn 4:113 Ibid book ten letters 33-34 p272
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
7/35
7
It was for this reason that a century earlier, Augustus had passed laws limiting
what associations were able to do. In particular, he decreed that they needed
Senatorial approval for being set up in the first place, that they needed to perform
some demonstrable public good and that if allowed to form they could meet no
more than once a month. The only exceptions to this were Jewish associations
namely synagogues which were allowed to gather each Sabbath day. Claudius
went further. He banned associations altogether, including synagogues.14
In Rome the Christian community was probably looked on as both an off-shoot of
Judaism and as an immigrant cult they spoke Greek in a Latin town, indicating
that most of their members were recent arrivals in the city rather than Rome
(possibly as slaves judging by the names of those greeted in Romans 1615) born
and bred.
Bruce Winter says: The Christian community, gathering as a separate entity from
the Jewish synagogues in Rome, would have been unauthorised and therefore
an 'illegal' association as there is n o evidence that it sought or secured imperial
and then senatorial approval. It would have had to demonstrate that it was not
political, but was engaged in that which benefited the public good. If by the time
of Nero, the term Christiani was used of Christians in Rome, this would have
confirmed that those who gathered could possibly involved in some illegal or
14 For discussion see James Jeffers The Greco-Roman World of the New Testament: Exploring thebackground of early Christianity (Downers Grove: IVP 1999) especially chapter 6; Ascough op cit
Chapter 415 See Peter Lampe From Paul to Valentinus: Christians at Rome in the First Two Centuries(Minneapolis:
Fortress, 2003) p153-183
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
8/35
8
clandestine activity. Therefore, it would have been open to suspicion of political
activity.16
The language of leadership
If it was difficult and dangerous for small groups mainly made up of poorer
people to be seen to be associations with officers and structures, then it's quite
likely that the early Christian movement had very little of either.
This raises a question, as we shall see, about the conclusions of those who
argue so confidently that they find a three-tier ecclesiastical structure in the
writings of Ignatius and his contemporaries. Might such people be reading much
later developments back into the second century, which in turn forces them to
read rather more into the Pastoral letters which they see as a staging post
between the genuinely Pauline letters and what happened in the Second Century
than is really warranted.
But first we need to ask about the social location of Christians. Space prevents
us from entering fully into this debate. Our interest is in coming to a judgement
about where the majority of Jesus followers were located socially and what
implications this had for where they gathered, in what numbers and how this
affected the development of organisational structures and leadership.17
16 Winter Op Cit p74 contra James Jeffers Greco-Roman Worldp7317 There is a vast literature on the social location of the early church. We cannot provide a representative
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
9/35
9
The earliest groups of Jesus followers met in homes either the homes of those
better off people who could act as patrons of the small groups or insulae
dwellings in the poorer parts of town where church organisation was even more
rudimentary. What clues can we find about how these groups were led and
where the teaching that sustained them came from?
While there are similarities between congregational organisation and that of the
synagogues on the one hand and voluntary associations on the other, it makes
far more sense to look at the influence of household structures on the
development of church organisation and ministry. Alastair Campbell says: Of
course there are points of similarity between the churches and the synagogues,
as between the churches and the associations and clubs that proliferated in the
Greco-Roman cities, yet I believe that it is to the household that the churches
were primarily indebted.18
Households were more than a model, he argues, they were the context in which
congregations gathered but more importantly, in which many people lived. He
points to the presence of household code-style teaching in Paul and Peter as
bibliography but for general discussion with the wealth of material cited see Wayne A Meeks The First
Urban Christians: The Social World of the Apostle Paul (New Haven: Yale 1983), Abraham J MalherbeSocial Aspects of Early Christianity (second edition expanded; Oregon: Wipf & Stock 2003); Reggie M
Kidd Wealth and Beneficence in The Pastoral Epistles (SBL Dissertation Series 122; Atlanta: Scholars
Press 1990); David M Scholar (ed) Social Distinctives of the Christians in the First Century: PivotalEssays by E. A. Judge (Peabody: Hendrickson 2008); Justin J Meggitt Paul, Poverty and Survival
(Edinburgh: T&T Clark 1998); and Steven J. Friesen Poverty in Pauline Studies: Beyond the So-calledNew Consensus (discussion article)JSNT26.3 (2004) 323-36118 Alastair Campbell The Elders: Seniority within Earliest Christianity (Edinburgh: T&T Clark 1994 P118
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
10/35
10
evidence of how important households were to the early Christians. And most
tellingly he argues: There is a striking absence of the kind of titles of office that
abound in inscriptions from both synagogue and association...we do not find this
in the churches, perhaps because it was foreign to the ethos of the Christian
movement, but perhaps also because the household imposed its own quiet
hierarchy on proceedings.19
Tracing trajectories across generations
In his analysis of the rise of the Christian churches, James T Burtchaell notes
that 'the beguilements of reading later usages back into an undefined past have
led to much myth and mischief.' 20
It could be argued that he compounds the myth-making with his argument that
the earliest Christian church derived its organizational style and leadership
structure (though not its language) from the synagogue, suggesting 'we must
suppose the synagogue pattern as normal from the start.'21 From this he asserts
that 'It is extremely improbable that those Christians who in so many ways had
organized themselves after the viable and familiar order of the Hellenistic Jewish
synagogue would have or could have dispensed with the linchpin of the
19 Ibid p119. See Roger W GehringHouse Church and Mission: The Importance of Household Structuresin Early Christianity (Peabody: Hendrickson 2004) for a full discussion20
James T Burtchaell From Synagogue to Church: Public services and offices in the earliest Christian
communities (Cambridge 1992) p27321 Ibid p293
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
11/35
11
operation, the community chief'22. And hence argues that he has accounted for
the rise of monepiscopacy by the early 100s.
But his suggestion that 'Clement is known to have been community chief of
Christians in Rome'23 is overstated. But it illustrates a strong theme in the
scholarship on the emergence of ministry in the early church that the pressure for
Christian communities all over the empire to both centralize and appoint single
powerful leaders over city-wide congregations was all-but irresistible by the turn
of the Second Century.
Such a position is confidently argued by Brian Capper in two essays charting the
development of the church and its ministry over the first century of its existence
which explores how the following assertion came to be true.24
Paul's vision of the church as a mutually nourishing, charismatically
inspired community in which each believer as a member of Christ's body
has [an] individual, Spirit-inspired contribution to make, practical, oracular,
or miraculous, in the public context of worship can hardly be reconciled
22 Ibid p30823 Ibid p309. See James Jeffers Conflict at Rome: Social Order and Hierarchy in Early Christianity
(Minneapolis: Fortress 1991) for a more nuanced account of Clements place among the Christians inRome.24 Brian Capper Order and Ministry in the Social Pattern of the New Testament Church in C. Hall and R.Hannaford (eds) Order and Ministry Leominster, Gracewing, 1996 pp. 61-103. Accessed on-line on
05/12/07 at http://www.canterbury.ac.uk/arts-humanities/theology-and-religious-studies/staff/dr-brian-
capper.asp; and Brian Capper Public Body, Private Women: The Ideology of Gender and Space and the
Exclusion of Women from Public Leadership in the Late First Century Church in Robert Hannaford and
Jannine Jobling (ed.) Theology and the Body Leominster U.K, Gracewing 1999, pp. 123-15. Accessedon-line 05/12/07 at http://www.canterbury.ac.uk/arts-humanities/theology-and-religious-studies/staff/dr-
brian-capper.asp
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
12/35
12
with Ignatius of Antioch's conception of the Church in the early second
century, in which the community's existence is defined by the threefold
order of bishop, elders and deacons and in which it is difficult to imagine
the layperson having prominent place or public role at all.25
Capper seems to take Ignatius of Antioch as the norm for the early Second
Century church. But this martyr-bishops understanding of leadership and
organization was only one among many however strongly he sought to
persuade everyone around him he was right. Contemporaries, such as Clement,
Hermas and Polycarp suggest alternative, more varied and nuanced readings of
the situation as we shall see.
Capper asserts that the church of the second Century was very different from
that of the Pauline era. In an era after the apostles, it struggled with heresy; its
growth meant that much larger, city-wide groups were gathering to worship; and
these twin developments led inexorably to the creation of leaders with increasing
amounts of authority.
He suggests that what he describes as the exclusion of the laity was an
unintended consequence of other developments26. He argues, for instance, that
the Pauline communities of the mid-first Century were small groups gathered in
25Capper Order and Ministry p1 (page numbers in both articles refer to the Word document version
posted on Cappers website and not to the version published)26 Ibid p2
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
13/35
13
the homes of prominent Christians.27 But the numbers of Christians in the larger
cities of the empire were so considerable by the Second Century that such
arrangements had been replaced by single larger gatherings overseen by a
bishop.
He argues that By the time of Ignatius, Christian worship was taking place on an
altogether larger scale. Ignatius depicts the bishop presiding over the eucharist,
surrounded by his council of elders, and assisted in his ministry to the gathered
laity by numerous deacons. Thus, the clergy themselves of a meeting of Ignatius'
congregation may have outnumbered the typical house-church of earlier times.
We are dealing with typical Christian meetings not of two of three dozen, but
perhaps of two or three hundred souls or more.28
Neither of the passages from Ignatius that Capper cites justifies his suggestion
that there was a single congregation in either of the cities Magnesia and Tralles
just that clergy should preside whenever the Christians gathered.
Ritva Williams suggests that far from describing the norm for church organisation
and leadership, Ignatius is laying claim to prophetic insight and authority when he
lays out his novel understanding of the church being overseen by a three-fold
27 Ibid. This is not the place to argue whether all or even most of Pauls communities met in larger homes,sponsored by the few householders who joined the new faith. It is the position argued by many such as
Wayne Meeks The First urban Christians: The Social World of the Apostle Paul (New Haven & London:
Yale University Press 1983). But it is not without its critics, for example Robert Jewett Tenement
Churches and communal meals in the Early Church: The Implications of a Form-Critical Analysis of 2
Thessalonians 3:10BR 38 (1993) Pp23-43; and Justin J Meggitt Paul, Poverty and Survival (Edinburgh:T&T Clarke, 1998).28 Ibid p4, citing Ignatius to Magnesians 5 and Trallians 3
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
14/35
14
ministry. She argues that his martyr-elect status gave Ignatius a liminal position
with regard to both the world and the churches that in turn gave him an authority
he otherwise couldnt have claimed.
She says: Ignatius invokes precisely this aspect of the liminal position to justify
his otherwise presumptuous instructions to communities in which he has no
personal role or statusIgnatius uses his status as a martyr and a prophet to
advocate for greater obedience to and solidarity with church leaders.29
She asserts that Ignatius does not appeal to tradition or precedent but to the
Spirit as the one who ultimately legitimates his view of church leadership. This
indicates how novel it is at the time he is writing. His appeals suggest that he
comes from a Christ-confessing community or circle in which prophets speaking
in the Spirit in the name of Jesus introduced this form of leadership.30 This
explains why in his letter to the Philadelpians, Ignatius is able to assert that
church leadership is appointed by God not human agency.31
So Cappers use of Ignatius as an example of normal church practice by the turn
of the Second Century is not without problems. Neither is his argument that
Protected physical facilities were certainly now available to allow much larger
meetings to occur at all times of the year, regardless of the weather or season. It
29 Ritva H Williams Stewards, Prophets, Keepers of the Word: Leadership in the Early Church(Peabody:
Hendrickson 2006) p13130 Ibid p13331 Ign Phld 1.1
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
15/35
15
may be that the scale of these gatherings has to do with the sheer success of the
Christian mission and the number of believers in each city, adding Believers
were gathered into larger groups to hearken to the secure voice of apostolic
tradition, rather than remain is smaller house-congregations with separate
eucharists.32
Furthermore, Capper argues that women lost their place in the leadership of the
church as congregations moved out of domestic space into public space where
womens roles were severely curtailed.
33
He suggests, for instance, that the
prohibition on womens ministry in 1 Corinthians 14 and 1Timothy 2 is because of
the transition of Christian worship from the context of the private home into
space which was clearly regarded as public according to prevailing norms, and in
which public expectations of decency applied.34
But there is no evidence to support the view that the Jesus movement moved out
of domestic spaces either domus or insulae into larger public buildings at this
early stage. Indeed the evidence suggests quite the reverse.35
32 Capper op cit p433
Public Body, Private Women34 Ibid p12. To make this case, he has to argue that 1 Corinthians 14:34-35 is a late interpolation, a case that
does not command widespread support. See the discussion in Gordon Fee The First Epistle to theCorinthians (NICNT Grand Rapids: Eerdmans 1987) who argues in favour and in Anthony Thiselton The
First Epistle to the Corinthians (NIGTC Grand Rapids/Carlisle: Eerdmans/Paternoster 2000) who argues
against35 See Bradley Blue Acts and the House Church in David W J Gill and Conrad Gempf (eds) The Book of
Acts in its First Century Setting: Volume 2: Greaco-Roman Setting (Grand Rapids/Carlisle Eerdmans/Paternoster 1994) p119-222 who argues that prior to 150AD the Christian communities everywhere met in
private homes, citing a wide range of literature in support of his argument.
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
16/35
16
Campbell demonstrates that seniority in the later New Testament namely the
pastorals and to a certain extent beyond, resided in householders because
congregations gathered in the homes of those sufficiently well-to-do to host a
group of 25-30. Such householders were those designated elder or deacon in
the pastorals.36
And as we shall see in the next section, what evidence there is for Rome
suggests that the Christian movement still met in domestic space in the time of
Clement and Hermas, in relatively small groups, led by different kinds of
officers37 Indeed, this is one reason for the diverse models of leadership and
organization and the tensions between them that can be discerned in the church
at this time.
But maybe the most important thing Campbell does is to remind us that the
Pauline churches were not without leaders. It's just that he had a different
vocabulary of leadership from other groups notably the synagogues.38
So in 1 Thessalonians Paul speaks of 'those who labour among and are over you
in the Lord to admonish you' (5:12). Labour renders a Greek word
which he uses elsewhere of his work in preaching and teaching. 5:14 indicates
36 Campbell op cit p176-205; Kidd Op Cit p83-8737 James Jeffers Op Cit, Peter Lampe Op Cit, Harry O MaierThe Social Setting of the Ministry as Reflected
in the Writings of Hermas, Clement and Ignatius(Studies in Christianity and Judaism, Ontario: Wilfred
Laurier University Press, 1991) and Carolyn Osiek Romans Down the Pike: Glimpses from Later Years
in Sheila E McGinn (ed) Celebrating Romans: Template for Pauline Theology: Essays in Honour of Robert
Jewett (Grand rapids: Eerdmans 2004) Pp149-16138 A feature recognised by Burtchaell who nevertheless goes on to argue that synagogues provided the
template for the earliest Christian communities.
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
17/35
17
that each community member has a role in admonishing, as well as encouraging
and helping. But 5:12 suggests here were some who did this more often and
more formally than others who were, therefore, over other members of the
congregation as leaders (the word Paul uses is ).
This word also appears in Romans 12:8 in the list of gifts of the
Spirit and is usually rendered 'leadership' in English. It might have something to
do with offering patronage of one sort or another to the Christian communities
whether simply by hosting meetings and providing food for communion or by
freeing resources for others to engage in service of one kind or another.
Jewett argues that Paul deliberately uses a bland expression to describe this gift
and argues that it is different from being a patron (). The expression
probably implies appointment to a leadership role in an early house or tenement
church whether as presider, administrator of charitable work or pastoral
supervisor.39
Phoebe in Romans 16:1-2 is, however, described as a patron (). She is
also a which simply means servant and yet is a word which has
become charged with all kinds of nuances that it doesn't deserve. Maybe,
everywhere it occurs in the New Testament we should translate it servant and
39 Robert Jewett Romans: (Hermeneia a critical and historical commentary on the Bible; Minneapolis:
Fortress 2007) p753
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
18/35
18
then see what that does to our thinking about ministry.40
Perhaps leadership or ministry, Campbell suggests, rests on a mixture of position
in the household and a willingness to use that position for the good of others.
This certainly seems to be what Paul is saying about Stephanus in 1 Corinthians
16:15-17. Such a man, says Paul, should be known, respected and recognised.
Why? Because they have served the saints in some way. He is a fellow worker
and labourer, says Paul. Campbell comments: This is the distinctive vocabulary
of Pauline mission and implies that Stephanus was prominent in a group of
people who were active in preaching and teaching on behalf of the church as a
whole.41
James Dunn plays down the role of such people because they did it voluntarily
but as Campbell notes, this is to completely misunderstand the voluntaristic
nature of most public office in Greek and Roman cities. You couldn't serve the
public good unless you could afford it because there were no salaries to go with
the jobs.42
It is interesting to note that when Paul writes to the Philippians, he greets the
and along with the saints. It is the only Pauline letter to a
40 For a full discussion of the meaning of the term, see John N CollinsDiakonia: Re-interpreting Ancient
sources (New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press 1990). For an assessment see Paula Gooder
Diakonia in the New Testament: A Dialogue with John N CollinsEcclesiology 3.1 (2006) p33-5641
Campbell Op Cit p12342 Dunn Op Cit p113 ; Campbell Ibid; see Andrew D Clarke Called to Serve the Community and the
Church: Christians as Leaders and Ministers (Grand rapids: Eerdmans 2000) especially p11-77
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
19/35
19
group of churches that contains this greeting which immediately raises the
question, that if some of the churches to which he wrote especially the church
at Corinth, for instance were in such a mess, why doesn't he tell the leaders to
sort it out? Why does he not demand that the elders, deacons, pastors,
overseers, bishops or whatever we want to call them knock heads together and
get things back on an even keel? Indeed having mentioned and
in the opening greeting of Philippians, he does not suggest that they get
involved in sorting out the disagreement between Euodia and Syntyche
perhaps because they themselves were or. Only his veiled
reference to , almost certainly not a proper name, as one who might help
solve the issue between the women, gives a hint that personal mediation might
be needed.43
But even to raise these questions is to realise how anachronistic they sound.
They come from reading back into the New Testament two thousand years of
history during which churches have moved out of the home and become stand-
alone institutions in their own right requiring leadership structures in the same
way multi-national corporations do.
Campbell suggests that Phil 1:1 tells us that there were in some
Pauline congregations, that in Philippi there was more than one of them, that no
single person was in overall control (not surprising since there were a number of
43For a full discussion see Gordon Fee Pauls Letter to the Philippians (NICTNT Grand Rapids: Eerdmans
1995) p389-398 and Davorin Peterlin Pauls Letter to the Philippians in the Light of Disunity in the Church
(Supplements to Novum Testamentum LXXIX; Leiden: E.J. Brill 1995) p101-132.
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
20/35
20
house churches in the city) and that the absence of the definite article suggests
that the was not a tightly defined group. It could be that all Paul is
saying is that he's sending his letter to 'those who lead and serve' as well as the
saints, or perhaps 'those who lead by serving' (but that isn't an obvious
translation).44 It's entirely possible that Clement, Epaphroditus, Euodia and
Syntyche (2:25-30, 4:2-3) are . They possibly served the churches in
Philippi in the way Stephanus did at Corinth and Phoebe at Cenchrae.
Andrew Clarke points out that the early Christians designated their gatherings
rather than synagogues despite having grown out of Palestinian Jewish
soil. He further claims It is clear that these early Christians were already
operating with the expectation that the characteristics of leadership within the
Christian should parallel those characteristics of leadership in the civic
45
But he goes on to stress that the nature of the Christian demands a
different style of leading than its civic counterpart. Perhaps what he means by
this is explained by William Lane in his description of Roman house churches:
The host who possessed the resources and initiative to invite the church into his
or her home assumed major leadership responsibilities deriving from the
patronage offered. These included important administrative tasks, such as the
provision of the common meals of the community, the extension of hospitality to
44 Fee Op Cit p66-6945 Clarke Op Cit p153
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
21/35
21
travelling missionaries and other Christians, the representation of the community
outside the domestic setting, in addition to pastoral oversight and governance...A
position of authority emerged out of the benefits that individuals of relatively
higher wealth and social status could confer upon the community.46
This provides a clue as to where into this picture we fit the lists of gifts and
ministries that Paul refers to in 1 Corinthians 12 and 14 and Romans 12. 47 The
householder hosted the gathering and ensured that there was food for the
community meal.
48
But the gathering itself appears to have been largely self-
governing with members offering words, prayers and songs. It is likely that the
host would have brought people to order for the breaking of bread that signalled
the remembrance of Christ's death on the cross that established the church. In 1
Corinthians 15 Paul indicates that such traditions were handed down generally
within in the church and 1 Corinthians 11:17ff he reminds the Corinthians of the
story of Jesus' supper than had been passed on to him (probably by Peter) ands
that these traditions constitute the beginnings of a liturgy to be used at such
gatherings.
In Galatians 6 Paul refers to in the context of restoring those who
46 William L Lane Social Perspectives on Roman Christianity during the Formative Years from Nero to
Nerva: Romans, Hebrews, 1 Clement in Karl Donfried and Peter Richardson (eds)Judaism andChristianity in First century Rome (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans 1998) p21147 The list in Ephesians 4:11 is also pertinent here but debate over the authorship of the letter makes it less
useful in this argument.48 Robert Jewett argues that evidence from Thessalonica suggests that the communal meal in tenement
churches was more like a pot-luck supper as the church had no patron or host. See Tenement Churches andcommunal meals in the Early Church: The Implications of a Form-Critical Analysis of 2 Thessalonians
3:10BR 38 (1993) Pp23-43
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
22/35
22
have fallen into sin. Does Paul see these people as leaders or as mature Jesus
followers able to assist those newer to the faith or simply anyone who has the
Spirit? Our answer to this might have a bearing on how we interpret the same
word in 1 Corinthians 12:1; in particular do we read it as a masculine plural (and
render the word spiritual people) or a neuter plural (and render the word spiritual
things or gifts49).
It could be that in the earliest days of the movement, those who had grasped the
basics of the faith, demonstrated a maturity of understanding and a concern for
others, were the ones who offered advice and help to others in the group
perhaps only a handful of others. Such people could be have been seen as
spiritual in the sense that they had journeyed further than others and so were
seen as leaders.
Rome and Philippi tracing trajectories
What evidence is there for how the language of leadership developed as the
apostles died off and the church faced fresh challenges of growth and teaching
that not rooted in the apostolic tradition? Well briefly examine late First/early
Second Century documents from Rome and Philippi for clues about the
organisation and leadership of the Jesus movement in these cities.
49The translation gift is determined by the subsequent discussion of Pauls preferred term
for describing the manifestations of the Spirit that subsequent commentators have called the gifts of the
Spirit. For full discussion see Fee Op Cit and Thiselton Op Cit
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
23/35
23
1 Clementand The Shepherd of Hermasoffer clues to the social location of
Christians, the influence of the Roman social context on the development of
these groups and the patterns of authority that enabled them to navigate their
way in conditions that were not altogether well-disposed to the new movement.
For Philippi Polycarps letter will hopefully round out the picture.
Roman perspectives
James Jeffers has undertaken a careful analysis of the social context in which
the Roman followers of Jesus lived. He offers a close reading of two
contemporary documents 1 Clementand The Shepherd of Hermas that
suggests that not only was there not a single church in Rome at this time, but
that there were tensions between different household-based groups.
He argues that both Clement and the author of the Shepherd both came from the
populus urbanusgroup of free-born or freed people. Clement probably came
from the more prosperous end of this large social group. Clement himself
probably was an imperial freedman. First Clementthus implies the existence of
at least one Christian house church which was led by imperial freedmen and
drew its members at least in part from descendents of the imperial household
and from dependents of other aristocratic families. First Clementsays nothing
directly about the most numerous members of this class [the populous urbanus],
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
24/35
24
the freeborn Romans or foreigners who supported themselves financially.50
This would make sense in the light of Pauls greetings to congregations in Rome
at the end of his letter. Peter Lampe has done detailed analysis on the 26 names
listed and suggests the presence of at least five congregations. During the two
first centuries the Christians of the city of Rome met separately in privately
owned locations scattered around the capital city. Forming a number of house
churches, they had no central worship facility a lack of central coordination that
matched the profile of the separated synagogues in Rome.
51
The author of The Shepherd seems to have come from lower down the social
order. There is a lot of criticism of the way rich people even rich followers of
Jesus lived. He certainly attacks those who are mixed up with business and
riches and heathen friendships and many other occupations with this world
(Mand 10.1.4). Jeffers suggests that his target may well have been Clements
congregation.52
Clements guiding theological principle is unity and good order. He writes to a
Corinthian congregation that has recently deposed its leadership and instated
50
Jeffers Conflict at Rome p101. It is important to note that he mines Clements letter not for informationprimarily about the Corinthian situation but for what his writing tells us about him and his house church in
Rome. Maier Op Cit chapter 4 investigates what 1 Clement tells about Corinthian Christianity, as doesDavid G Horrell The Social Ethos of the Corinthian Correspondence: Interests and Ideology from 1
Corinthians to 1 Clement (Edinburgh: T&T Clark 1996) especially chapter 651 Peter Lampe The Roman Christians of Romans 16 in Karl Donfried (ed) The Romans Debate (rev
edition; Peabody: Hendrickson 1991) p229. See Paul McKechnie The First Christian Centuries:
Perspectives on the Early Church (Downers Grove: IVP 2001) p137-149 for a thorough discussion ofChristianitys imperial links in the First and Second Centuries.52 Jeffers Op Cit p117-120
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
25/35
25
others in their place. This is unacceptable to Clement. Interestingly, he offers no
analysis of the actual situation in Corinth and makes no attempt to understand
the motives and actions of either side. He condemns the actions of the usurpers
solely on the ground that it offends against unity and good order. Clement
believes that, just as Rome remains in peace because all obey the emperor, the
community will remain in peace when all obey God, the master, by remaining in
submission to the congregations leaders.53
Such a benign view of empire is somewhat at odds with what Paul and Peter
write (Romans 13:1-7; 1 Peter 2-4) and surprising in view of the martyrdom of
both men in Rome an event referred to in 1 Clement 5:1-6:1 in rather strange
terms: it was jealousy and strife that led to their demise, the very things now
threatening to tear the Corinthian congregation apart. But Clements view of
empire was not surprising in view of the fact that he strongly allied congregational
with household leadership. Clement treated his congregation as a single
householdchurch leaders, like the paterfamilias, deserved unquestioning
honour and obedience, and followers must know and remain in their proper
places in the hierarchy.54
Jeffers argues that such a view of church is derived from the place Clement
occupied in the wider Roman society. It appears probable that the higher a
Christians social status in Rome, the more likely the Christian was to adopt the
53 Ibid p13754 Ibid p142
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
26/35
26
values of the surrounding society. Clement, he suggests, sought organisational
unity for the church by imposing on the churches an identity in imitation of the
Roman elites.55
The author of The Shepherd, on the other hand, sought authority for his teaching
not from institutional conformity but from prophetic non-conformity. He
challenges the existing leadership in Rome. Hermas is told to rebuke the church
leadership: you shall say, then, to the leaders of the church, that they reform
their ways in righteousness, to receive in full the promises with great glory (vis
2.2.6).56
Such words suggest that Hermas would have taken a diametrically opposite to
Clement on what was happening in Corinth. While Clement argued that leaders
were appointed by God and couldnt be removed even with the consent of the
congregation, Hermas asserts that leaders are not above criticism. Indeed, if they
fail to be the people God wants them to be, they should be removed. This
suggests a level of tension and debate about church organisation at the start of
the Second Century that the likes of Capper and Dunn have not paid sufficient
attention to.
The picture that emerges is of house churches across the city developing in
different ways according to the social location of their members and their attitude
55 Ibid p14356 Ibid p152-153
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
27/35
27
to prevailing social norms. In modern terms, Hermas argues the church should
be counter-cultural, whereas Clement urges his congregation to do nothing that
would arouse the ire of the authorities against them.
Clement uses various terms to describe the leaders the Corinthians and by
implication the congregations in Rome should obey. Pride of place goes to
, and (42.4; 44:4; 47:6; 54:2; 57:1). He argues
that having properly constituted leadership follows the order set down by the
apostles. When Clement states in 42:4, therefore, that the apostles appointed
their first converts ( the same term used in 1 Cor 16:15 and Rom
16:15) to be bishops and deacons, there is probably a kernel of historical truth
present.57
Maier highlights an issue with the word , however, namely that it is
ambiguous. In 1 Clement 1:3, 21:6 and in Hermas vision 3.1.8 it is not clear
whether to render it elder men or presbyter, he says, adding that the tension is
resolved if one argues that presbyters were in fact elder men.58
He points out
that 63:3 suggests a link between age and seniority. He argues that across the
empire churches operated in this way not only in Clements time but earlier.
In 1 Pet 5:5 the term i is used simultaneously to describe an age-
group and a class of leaders. Such authority, he argues, comes from contact
57 Maier Op Cit p11758 Ibid p105
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
28/35
28
with those who founded congregations, whether apostles or members of their
teams. The view which regards presbyters as the elder members of the
community is also more consistent with the emergence of authority structures
from below in the community, a process we [argue] began while the apostle was
still alive. 59
Such a view might make sense of the New Testament material especially the
pastorals and might be consistent with Ignatius assertion that leadership arises
through prophetic word.
60
But it hardly squares with Clements view of how
leadership is appointed since he is writing to the Corinthian church expressly to
rebuke them for removing their leaders and appointing a new group. 1 Clement
42 suggests that some kind of succession from the apostles is essential for there
to be legitimate leadership in the church.
Hermas appears to have a more fluid approach to leadership. In Vision 3.5 he
speaks of apostles, bishops, teachers and deacons leading because of their
purity and reverence (1). He also seems to suggest that those who have
suffered for the church have authority within the church (2) perhaps a nod in
the direction of those like Ignatius whose liminality confers authority. And in verse
3, he nods towards those who prove themselves through faithful living and purity
as having authority that could lead to appointment to office. If this is to read the
59 Ibid. It is also possible that the author of the pastorals was also aware of this ambiguity. Many of those
who were heads of households were older men and their social seniority came from that fact. This is why
Timothy is cautioned not to be ashamed of his youth and to take care when dealing with those older thanhimself (1 Timothy 4:12; 5:1)60 Williams Op Cit p130-133
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
29/35
29
vision correctly, Hermas is arguing that leadership in the church is conferred on
those whose lives are exemplary in some way. This is not far from Pauls
suggestion that Christians imitate him (1 Corinthians 11:1) and others who follow
his teaching and lifestyle (1 Corinthians 4:16-17; Philippians 3:15-17).
A view from Philippi
We have already noted that the only place where Paul uses the terms
and in his undisputed letters is in Philippians 1:1. It is clear that the
community he is writing to is made up of a number of household congregations
and is probably full of mainly poor, non-Roman citizens a congregation more
like that of Hermas than of Clement.61 The only other evidence we have relating
to the Christian community in Philippi is the letter the bishop of Smyrna sent to
the church sometime in the second quarter of the Second Century.62
Polycarp is known to us through this letter, through an anonymous record of his
eventual martyrdom and in a number of references in later church fathers. His
writing is awash with references to writings that ended up in the New Testament.
There are some 48 quotations or strong allusions to such writings, including three
from Pauls letter to the Philippians.
61 For a full discussion of the context of Pauls letter see Peter Oakes Philippians: From People to letter
(Society for New Testament Studies Monograph series 110; Cambridge 2001) especially p1-7662 We will use Polycarps letter primarily to seek information on how the Philippian church has developed
rather than for what it tells about Smyrna
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
30/35
30
Polycarps life and ministry spanned the time between the end of the apostolic
era and the emergence of catholic Christianity, and as a proto-orthodox leader he
was deeply involved in the central issues and challenges of this critical era.
These included the increasing possibility of conflict with the Roman state, the
challenge of the emerging Gnostic movement and its charismatic leaders (such
as Cerinthus and Marcion), the development and expansion of the monepiscopal
form of ecclesiastical organisation and the beginning of the formation of a canon
of early Christian writings.63
Polycarp writes with gentleness and humility to a church that has sought his
advice. In 3:1 he says that he is writing about righteousness ()
because they have asked him to but he immediately observes that they have
Pauls letter and the memory of his visit (no doubt handed down in oral tradition
with the community) which is of far more value than anything he could write.
A key theme of his letter is about the love of money, a theme that not only
echoes 1 Timothy 6:6-10, but also has connections with Hermas emphasis on
the rich needing to use their wealth in godly ways. It suggests that the church
might be struggling with the issue of money for a very specific reason namely
that people are being appointed to roles within the community that carry either
financial responsibility for community funds or command a salary of some kind.
This is not new. In Galatians Paul urges his hearers to share with those who
63 Michael Holmes Polycarp of Smyrna, Epistle to the Philippians in Paul Foster (ed) The Writings of the
Apostolic Fathers (Edinburgh: T&T Clark 2007) p109
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
31/35
31
teach them (6:6) and in 1 Corinthians 9 he spoke of the norm which he rejected
for reasons he explains that apostles and travelling missionaries are worthy of
the support of the congregations in which they minister. In 1 Timothy 5:17 there
is a suggestion of paid overseeing ministry already being in place.64
One of the issues Polycarp is concerned about is the situation with Valens. In
chapter 11 the author expresses his grief over Valens who was once a presbyter
among them.65 It is possible that his failure has to do with Valens mishandling
money or being motivated by money, something suggested by the lesson
Polycarp seeks to draw out of the episode in 11:1b. Self control is vital in
leadership, he says. Yet in 11:3 he says I have not observed or heard any such
thing among you. We assume by this he is referring to the rest of the
congregation and not to Valens, who needs to repent (4). The end of the chapter
gives us the strongest hint that Valens might have been a paid presbyter of the
church because he urges them to seek his restoration and in the meantime to be
reasonable towards them, possibly a reference to them needing to ensure that
he and his family do not starve while the rest of the church leadership works to
restore his faith and (possibly?) position. In passing, its interesting to note that
just as Paul in his letter did not tell the leaders of the community to sort out the
argument between Euodia and Syntyche, so Polycarp does not call on the other
leaders to resolve the issue with Valens. Rather it seems to be left to the whole
64 For a full discussion of this see Campbell Op Cit p194-204 where he argues that in the pastorals we have
the first firm evidence of single overseeing elders rising to positions of authority over whole towns or
cities; in other words the beginnings of monepiscopacy.65 Chapters 10-12 are only available to us in Latin but we assume that the original described Valens as
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
32/35
32
church to restore him as part of building up the body (4). This seems to be very
similar to the advice Paul gave the Galatians over how to treat members who
were straying into sin (Galatians 6:1).
Polycarps letter in fact contains very little about formal leadership and a huge
amount about every member of the church living quality Christian lives. He does
not describe himself as a bishop, though does say that he writing with his
presbyters (salutation). He stresses that must be blameless (5:2) as
servants of God in a passage strongly reminiscent of the Pastoral Epistles. But it
is set the context that all members of the congregation should live worthy of him,
picking up the citizenship language that Paul uses in 3:20 in 5:2.
The have a particular ministry to those on the edge of the church (in
danger of straying) and to the sick, the widows and poor (6:1). They should serve
as the apostles and prophets did before them. In particular, they should be
examples of good and godly behaviour (9:1) as others have been. The reference
to Valens indicates that presbyter was an office in the church and therefore
recognised by the congregation.
Polycarp addresses his letter to but the letter contains no
information about how that church is organized beyond it having leadership with
the labels and . He gives us no information regarding how
and where the church met, whether it was a single entity (unlikely) or met in
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
33/35
33
homes around the city (more likely given the evidence from Pauls letter and
other writings from Polycarps contemporaries). And most interestingly in the light
of Holmes suggestion that he is a key link in the chain of development of
monepiscopacy, he does not once use the word . He does not use
that label to describe himself nor suggest that there is a single overseeing leader
in the community.
This is all-the-more noteworthy in light of the fact that the only time Paul uses the
words and is in his letter to the Philippian community and
because Ignatius, that great champion of episcopacy, wrote to Smyrna urging
that the congregation be obedient to its bishop and stressing that the bishop has
to be at the heart of every gathering (8:1-2); and to Polycarp himself, reminding
him of his title (salutation) and urging him to live up to the calling of his office
(1:2-3). Furthermore he lays out to Polycarp, as he had already done to his
church, the necessity of obeying the bishop, presbyters and deacons.
Peter Oakes suggests in the light of this that Polycarps failure to mention
episcopacy at all must be a deliberate strategy on his part. Polycarps explicit
encouragement of the Philippians to study Pauls letter, and the way in which his
use of New Testament and other texts implicitly calls them to use the resources
they have available, suggests that Polycarp wants the bishopless Philippian
community to be self-sufficient and not to seek oversight from elsewhere,
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
34/35
34
including him.66
Far from being one of those who urged the churches over which he had influence
to adopt the three-fold ministry with a single bishop at its apex, Polycarp seems
to approve of the lack of any episcopacy in the Philippian church. Even though
he is aware of Pauls letter and therefore would know that Paul greeted the
and , Polycarp does nothing to suggest that the Philippians
lack of a bishop is a problem that needs to be corrected. Indeed the evidence of
the Philippian church is that the development of oversight of congregations was
not a smooth path from rudimentary house church leadership based on heads of
households to a strict observance of a three-fold, hierarchical model. Episcopacy,
it seems, was still seen as contingent: if it helps groups to organise their affairs,
then fine; if not, equally fine.
At the very least what this suggests is that even in the mid-Second century,
patterns of organisation and authority in the Jesus movement are still extremely
fluid. The only consistent terms, arising in the New Testament and still being
used by Clement, Hermas, Polycarp and Ignatius, are the terms that gave rise to
the so-called three-fold ministry, namely , , and .
But as yet those terms are not describing fixed offices.
Frances Young suggests that only the latter two were consistently used from the
66Peter Oakes Leadership and Suffering in the Letters of Polycarp and Paul to the Philippians in Andrew
F Gregory and Christopher M Tuckett (eds) Trajectories Through the New Testament and the Apostloic
Fathers (Oxford 2005) p369
8/3/2019 The Matrix of Leadership _final
35/35
35
apostolic times and that they are very general words describing functions that
had to happen if the communities were to be administrated. They referred to
rendering service and overseeing organization and they carried authority only in
that they performed those functions effectively.67
67France Young Ministerial Forms and Functions in the Church Communities of the Greek Fathers in
Richard Longenecker (ed) Community Formation in the Early Church and in the Church today (Peabody: