The Mentality Profile, Toward an Economy of HR Metrics

7/30/2019 The Mentality Profile, Toward an Economy of HR Metrics

1/24

+234-703-430-2486

The Mentality Profile:

Toward an Economy of HR Metrics

AGAPE

CONSULTANTS

24th

October, 2012

View

my profile

WordPress

Google Me

The basis for a precise HR

Keywords: Commitment,Concatenation, Effort, Order,Process, Productivity, Thought, Value, Values
http://ng.linkedin.com/pub/peter-anyebe/17/292/589http://ng.linkedin.com/pub/peter-anyebe/17/292/589http://ng.linkedin.com/pub/peter-anyebe/17/292/589http://peteranyebe.wordpress.com/http://peteranyebe.wordpress.com/http://vizibility.com/Springflowerhttp://vizibility.com/Springflowerhttp://www.futurict.eu/users/peter-anyebehttp://www.mendeley.com/profiles/peter-anyebehttp://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002433351902http://www.12manage.com/profile.asp?m=anyebepeterhttp://www.slideshare.net/peteranyebehttp://vizibility.com/Springflowerhttp://vizibility.com/Springflowerhttp://peteranyebe.wordpress.com/http://ng.linkedin.com/pub/peter-anyebe/17/292/589http://ng.linkedin.com/pub/peter-anyebe/17/292/589http://ng.linkedin.com/pub/peter-anyebe/17/292/589http://ng.linkedin.com/pub/peter-anyebe/17/292/589http://vizibility.com/Springflower


2/24

+234-703-430-2486



By

Peter Anyebe

Abstract

Society is the product of the activities ofhumansinnature, but in time it becomes a monster thatmakes people; according to theculture, values,

beliefs,norms, andmores which are notnecessarily optimised

Based on this dictum, this work investigates thefollowing conclusions aboutnature,humanity,and thesociety:

The universe is characterised by a continuousfluxBecause of thespeed, there is an appearance of disorder, which is falseThe underlyingorder traces thenormal curve and is bell shaped, anindication that the environment places a limit on all activities that must riseand fall

Sustained growth would therefore require levitation, whichs analogue in thiscase isappreciationFor thehumans who come to this realisation, the following conditions wouldhold true:

Theoretical simulations and initial empirical data fit these conclusions.

View my profile Google Me WordPress

RES = RGT,

Nu 4Ps 20%

RES = Response to StimuliRGT= Appropriateness of ResponseNu = Number of Essentials IdentifiedPs = Position on the Pareto 80-20 Continuum

The Sleep of Reason Produces Monsters

Francisco de Goya
http://ng.linkedin.com/pub/peter-anyebe/17/292/589http://ng.linkedin.com/pub/peter-anyebe/17/292/589http://vizibility.com/Springflowerhttp://vizibility.com/Springflowerhttp://peteranyebe.wordpress.com/http://peteranyebe.wordpress.com/http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/works-of-art/18.64.43http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/works-of-art/18.64.43http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/works-of-art/18.64.43http://vizibility.com/Springflowerhttp://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002433351902http://www.mendeley.com/profiles/peter-anyebehttp://www.futurict.eu/users/peter-anyebehttp://www.slideshare.net/peteranyebehttp://www.12manage.com/profile.asp?m=anyebepeterhttp://peteranyebe.wordpress.com/http://vizibility.com/Springflowerhttp://ng.linkedin.com/pub/peter-anyebe/17/292/589


3/24

+234-703-430-2486



By

Peter Anyebe

0.0 Preamble

The following dictums have been ascribed to Thorndike, E. L. (18741949):

All science rests upon and begins with

accurate description and measurement

Whatever exists, exists in some quantity

and can, in principle, be measured

The only things that can be known for sure

are those that can be measured

Measurement involves the following two, 2 processes:

Itemise the essential components of the phenomenon (Description?)

Map these into the number line, according to the observed relationshipsbetween them (Quantification)

For the typical human person, going beyondappearances to identify essentials is anordeal that is not worth the effort. But it is the essential elements of phenomena thatdefine theirbeing. Until these are unravelled therefore, any claims to the knowledgeof phenomena would be limited. With the generalisation of thescientific methodthat made the adoption of the quantitative approach in the arts and humanitiesunavoidable, thesystems principle became the kernel of the research methodology.The first tentative inroads to this adoption involved a strategy that defined systemsindirectly, by observing their inputs and outputs. With sufficient data, it was hoped,the systemsblack box would be defined adequately, to describe its being. Beforethen, the arena would be a free for all, an all comers affair.

View my profile Google Me WordPress
http://ng.linkedin.com/pub/peter-anyebe/17/292/589http://ng.linkedin.com/pub/peter-anyebe/17/292/589http://vizibility.com/Springflowerhttp://vizibility.com/Springflowerhttp://peteranyebe.wordpress.com/http://peteranyebe.wordpress.com/http://vizibility.com/Springflowerhttp://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002433351902http://www.mendeley.com/profiles/peter-anyebehttp://www.futurict.eu/users/peter-anyebehttp://www.slideshare.net/peteranyebehttp://www.12manage.com/profile.asp?m=anyebepeterhttp://peteranyebe.wordpress.com/http://vizibility.com/Springflowerhttp://ng.linkedin.com/pub/peter-anyebe/17/292/589


4/24

HR has had its fair share of this rat race. Progress has depended a lot on leaps frompsychology research into the personality, emotion, attitude and allied concepts. Butpsychology has also suffered limitations that made it shift emphasis from

phenomenology tobehaviourism.Behaviourism has almost remained stuck in theinput-output,cause and effect approach to quantitative analysis; and this, with theattendant plethora of factors and concepts. To reintegrate phenomenology and thestudy ofconsciousness into psychology, to complement behaviourism, required that

the following minimum conditions be satisfied:

Trace the path from thought tobehaviourLinkperception tosensationDefine the energy flow that drives these processes

These challenges have been summarised in the age oldriddle of mind and matter, aswell as the controversy aboutdeterminism. Recall the following assertions fromCattell, R. B in his book, The Scientific Analysis of Personality, published byPenguin Books in 1968:

The organism is a tremendously ingenious arrangement of

protoplasm, set to seek only to maintain life in itself and to

propagate itself

Behaviour traits are necessary negotiations or compromises

between the physiological demands of the organism on the one

hand, and the physical and social demands of the environment on

the other

A trait is not something existing in a person, it is a concept and a

measurement derived from his relations to his environment, though

it hinges on him

These statements derive from purely materialistic definitions ofhumans that grouppeople withanimals andplants as life forms, without a clear distinction between thethree, 3. This attitude could be traced to Kantian philosophy, which distinguishedbetween thenatural order, N-O and thepersonal order, P-O but argued that theN-O can not be known. Immanuel Kant differentiated between these concepts in thefollowing definitions:


5/24

Phenomena: Things as they appear to our senses (TheP-O?)

Noumena: Things in themselves; that are purely objects ofthought, independently of sense perception; which, by definition,we can never experience (TheN-O?)

This work presents an attempt at the resolution of these knotty difficulties in thefollowing conceptions:

The natural order,N-OThe perception model of mind,PMMThe concatenation modelThe phenomenology modelThe character model The value creation paradigmThe path to soulThe model humanA model of learningThe productivity model

1.00 Natures Secret Plan and the Universal History

The history of mankind can be seen, in the large, as the realization ofnatures secret plan to bring forth a perfectly constituted state as theonly condition in which the capacities of mankind can be fullydeveloped, and also bring forth that external relation among states whichis perfectly adequate to this end

A philosophical attempt to work outa universal historyaccording to anatural plan directed to achieving the civic union of the human racemust be regarded as possible and, indeed, as contributing to this end ofnature

Immanuel Kant, 1784

Currently,society is the product of the activities ofhumans innature, but in time itbecame a monster that makes people; according to theculture, values,beliefs,

norms, andmores which are not necessarily optimised. But in agreement with Kant,
http://www.slideshare.net/peteranyebe/a-unitary-history-of-humanity-charthttp://www.slideshare.net/peteranyebe/a-unitary-history-of-humanity-charthttp://www.slideshare.net/peteranyebe/a-unitary-history-of-humanity-charthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kanthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kanthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kanthttp://www.slideshare.net/peteranyebe/a-unitary-history-of-humanity-chart


6/24

society has been undergoing an evolution, with the increase in knowledge. As peopleshift from the preoccupation with appearances to the perception of essentials, thenature of their contributions to the society changes, which results in changes in thesocio-political and economy of societies. RecallStephen Hawkingon Charles

Darwins natural selection as follows:

In any population of self-reproducing organisms, there will be variations

in thegenetic materialand upbringing that different individuals have

These differences will mean that some individuals are better able thanothers todraw the right conclusions about the world around them and to

act accordingly

These individuals will be more likely tosurvive and reproduce and sotheir pattern of behaviour and thought will come todominate

The industrial revolution exposed the human inefficiency and ineffectiveness, via

thewastethat became apparent due to the crudity of the first set of machines. Thesix sigma, 6principle suggested theprocess as the solution to the waste,inefficiency and ineffectiveness. The information revolution that is currently withus holds the potential to institutionalise this solution. For instance, whendata isdefined as information that includes numbers, text, images, and sounds then the

process becomesthe unit of data. Recall that the process is actually a series ofactions, each of which can be represented by a text. The typical standard procedurepresented in this work comprises six, 6 items, each of which is uniquely located inthe series. Adopting this principle of the standard procedure expands the 6

principle from engineering to cover the other aspects of production, together with

the attendant drop in waste and improvements in efficiency and effectiveness.

Pareto, in the 8020 Rule, argued that 80% of the work in most organisations isdone by20% of the personnel. This distinguishes the 80%ters who simply follow,from the20%ters who form the strike team in the organisation. It is the20%ters whoperform at tasks by the standard procedure. They define the standard, whichculturesought to attain in the upbringing of their members. It is this culture that is theproduct ofnatures secret plan, to the end of which the increase in knowledge aswell as the industrial and information revolutions are geared.
http://www.fisica.net/relatividade/stephen_hawking_a_brief_history_of_time.pdfhttp://www.fisica.net/relatividade/stephen_hawking_a_brief_history_of_time.pdfhttp://www.fisica.net/relatividade/stephen_hawking_a_brief_history_of_time.pdfhttp://www.ideafinder.com/history/inventors/ford.htmhttp://www.ideafinder.com/history/inventors/ford.htmhttp://www.ideafinder.com/history/inventors/ford.htmhttp://www.ideafinder.com/history/inventors/ford.htmhttp://www.fisica.net/relatividade/stephen_hawking_a_brief_history_of_time.pdf


7/24

2.00 Platonian Duality

For the sake of brevity, the increase in knowledge is traced from Plato, throughEinstein andFeynman, toHawking who is currently alive and has made importantallusions to the works of the other three, 3. Although Kant did not agree with Platothatnoumenacould be defined, Platosduality principle founded the distinctionbetween noumena andphenomena in the differentiation between the following two,2 worlds:

The world ofForms (Noumena?)The world ofObjects (Phenomena?)

At the heart ofPlatos philosophy is his theory offorms, or ideas. Ultimately, hisview of knowledge, his ethical theory, his psychology, his concept of the state, andhis perspective on art must be understood in terms of this theory. His theory of formsand his theory of knowledge are so interrelated that they are better discussedtogether. Influenced by Socrates, Plato was convinced that knowledge, or the

natural order, N-O is attainable. He was also convinced of two essentialcharacteristics of knowledge. First, 1st knowledge must be certain and infallible.Second, 2nd knowledge must have as its object that which is genuinelyrealascontrasted with that which is anappearance only. Because that which is fully realmust, for Plato, be fixed, permanent, and unchanging, he identified the real with theideal realm of being as opposed to the physical world of becoming. Reality in thiscase would be a reference to the essentials. Plato summarised his thoughts intheimage of the divided line andthe myth of the cave.

Inthe image of the divided line, Plato distinguishes between two levels ofawareness as follows:

Opinion andKnowledge

Thus claims or assertions about the physical or visible world, including bothcommonsense observations and the propositions of science, are opinions only. Someof these opinions are well founded and some are not; but none of them counts asgenuine knowledge. At the higher level awareness translates into knowledge,

becausereason, rather than mere sense experience, is involved.


8/24

Reason, properly used, results in intellectual insights that are certain, and the objectsof theserational insights are the abiding universals, the eternalforms or substancesthat constitute the real world. Plato usesreason andrationality synonymously anddoes not distinguish between them.

The myth of the cave describes individuals chained deep within the recesses of acave. Bound so that vision is restricted, they cannot see one another. The only thing

visible is the wall of the cave upon whichappear shadows cast by models or statuesof animals and objects that are passed before a brightly burning fire. Breaking free,one of the individuals escapes from the cave into the light of day. With the aid of thesun, that person sees for the first time the real world and returns to the cave with themessage that the only things they had seen up till then wereshadows and

appearances and that the real world awaits them if they are willing to struggle freeof their bonds. The shadowy environment of the cave symbolizes for Platothe

physical world of appearances. Escape into the sun-filled setting outside the cavesymbolizes the transition to the real world, the world of full and perfect being, the

world of Forms, which is the proper object of knowledge.Forms have greater reality than objects in the physical world both because of theirperfection and stability and because they are models, resemblance to which givesordinary physical objects whatever reality they have. Everything in the world ofspace and time is what it is by virtue of its resemblance to, or participation in, itsuniversal form. The ability to define the universal term is evidence that one hasgrasped the form to which that universal refers.

Hawking made reference to this principle in his explanation of Einsteins general

relativity principle. Thus in general relativity, bodies always follow straight lines infour-dimensional space-time, but they nevertheless appear to move along curvedpaths in our three-dimensional space. This is rather like watching an airplane flyingover hilly ground. Although it follows a straight line in three-dimensional space, itsshadow follows a curved path on the two-dimensional ground. The mass of the suncurves space-time in such a way that although the earth follows a straight path infour-dimensional space-time, it appears to move along a circular orbit in three-dimensional space.


9/24

3.00 Einsteins General Relativity

In thegeneral theory of relativity Einstein made the revolutionary suggestion thatgravity is not a force like other forces, but is a consequence of the fact that space-time is not flat, as had been previously assumed: it is curved, or warped, by thedistribution of mass and energy in it. Bodies like the earth are not made to move oncurved orbits by a force called gravity; instead, they follow the nearest thing to astraight path in a curved space, which is called ageodesic. A geodesic is the shortestpath between two nearby points. For example, the surface of the earth is a two-dimensional curved space.A geodesic on the earth is called a great circle, and isthe shortest route between any two points. As the geodesic is the shortest pathbetween any two airports, this is the route an airline navigator will tell the pilot to flyalong.

Space and time are now dynamic quantities: when a body moves, or a force acts, itaffects the curvature of space and time; and in turn the structure of space-time

affects the way in which bodies move and forces act. Space and time not only affectbut also are affected by everything that happens in the universe. Just as one cannottalk about events in the universe without the notions of space and time, so in generalrelativity it became meaningless to talk about space and time outside the limits of theuniverse. The old idea of an essentially unchanging universe that could have existed,and could continue to exist, forever was replaced by the notion of a dynamic,expanding universe that seemed to have begun a finite time ago, and that might endat a finite time in the future.

The whole history of science has been the gradual realization that events do not

happen in an arbitrary manner, but that they reflect a certain underlyingorder, whichmay or may not be divinely inspired. It would be only natural to suppose that thisorder should apply not only to the laws, but also to the conditions at the boundary ofspace-time that specify the initial state of the universe. In order to predict how theuniverse should have started off, one needs laws that hold at the beginning of time.But when one combines general relativity with the uncertainty principle of quantummechanics, it is possible for both space and time to be finite without any edges orboundaries. Thus, just asNewtons laws of motion put an end to the idea ofabsolute

position in space, the theory of relativity got rid ofabsolute time; and Feynmans

superposition and sum over histories got rid of theboundaries.


10/24

4.00 Feynmans Superposition and Sum over Histories

Thirty-one years ago Dick Feynman told me about his 'sum overhistories' version of quantum mechanics. "The electron does anythingit likes," he said. "It just goes in any direction, at any speed, forwardand backward in time, however it likes,and then you add up the

amplitudes and it gives you the wave function." I said to him "You'recrazy." But he isn't

Freeman Dyson, 1980

Following Hawking, in Feynmans formulation of quantum theory in terms ofa sumover histories, a particle does not have just a single history, as it would in a classicaltheory. Instead, it is supposed to follow every possible path in space-time, and witheach of these histories there are associated a couple of numbers, one representing

the size of a wave and the other representing its position in the cycle or phase. Thenthe probability that a particle passes through some particular point is found by adding up

the waves associated with every possible history that passes through that point.When one actually tries to perform these sums, however, one runs into severetechnical problems. The only way around these is to add up the waves for particle

histories that are not in real time, but take place in imaginary time. Imaginary timeis a well-defined mathematical concept. Taking any ordinary or real number andmultiplying it by itself, gives a positive number. For instance,2 times2 is4, but sois2 times2. There are however, special numbers called imaginary numbers thatgive negative numbers when multiplied by themselves. The one called i, whenmultiplied by itself, gives1,2i multiplied by itself gives4, and so on. In practice,

the real numbers are represented by a line going from left to right, with zero in themiddle, negative numbers like1,2, etc. on the left, and positive numbers, 1,2,etc. on the right. Then imaginary numbers are represented by a line going up anddown the page, with i,2i, etc. above the middle, andi,2i, etc. below. Thusimaginary numbers are in a sense numbers at right angles to ordinary real numbers.

Tomeasure time using imaginary numbers rather than the real ones has aninteresting effect on space-time. The distinction between time and space disappearscompletely. In Euclidean space-time there is no difference between the timedirection and directions in space. On the other hand, in real space-time, in which
http://www.sns.ias.edu/~dysonhttp://www.sns.ias.edu/~dysonhttp://www.sns.ias.edu/~dyson


11/24

events are labelled by ordinary real values of the time coordinate, it is easy to tell thedifference. The time direction at all points lies within the light cone, and spacedirections lie outside.

When Feynmans sum over histories is applied to Einsteins view of gravity, theanalogue of the history of a particle becomes a complete curved space-time thatrepresents the history of the whole universe. Because one is using Euclidean space-times, in which the time direction is on the same footing as directions in space, it ispossible for space-time to be finite in extent and yet to have no singularities thatformed a boundary or edge. Space-time would be like the surface of the earth, onlywith two more dimensions. The surface of the earth is finite in extent but it doesnthave a boundary or edge. This means that if a person sails off into the sunset, theydont fall off the edge or run into a singularity. See the similarities in the chartbelow:

The quantum theory of gravity has therefore opened up a new possibility, in whichthere would be no boundary to space-time and so there would be no need to specifythe behaviour at the boundary. There would be no singularities at which the laws ofscience broke down, and no edge of space-time at which one would have to appealto God or some new law to set the boundary conditions for space-time. The universewould be completely self-contained and not affected by anything outside itself. Itwould neither be created nor destroyed. It would justBE.

Source:http://www.fisica.net/relatividade/stephen_hawking_a_brief_history_of_time.pdf


12/24

In real time, the universe has a beginning and an end at singularities that form aboundary to space-time and at which the laws of science break down. But inimaginary time, there are no singularities or boundaries. So maybe what is calledimaginary time is really more basic, and what is called real is just an idea that isinvented to help describe what the universe is thought to be like.

But if the universe is completely self-contained, with no singularities or boundariesthat has profound implications for the role of God as Creator. So long as the universehad a beginning, we could suppose it had a creator. But if the universe is reallycompletely self-contained, having no boundary or edge, it would have neitherbeginning nor end and would simply be. What place, then, for a creator?

Hawking concludes however, that these principles only define a set of rules andequations. This causes the crucial question to be re-phrased. What is it that breathesfire into the equations and makes a universe for them to describe? Neither can theusual approach to science, of constructing a mathematical model, answer thequestions of why there should be a universe for the model to describe. Finding the

answer to this question would be the ultimate triumph of human reason, because thiswould make the mind of God known.

5.00 The Mentality Profile

FollowingPlato,Einstein,Feynman, andHawking;

A Godwho isself-contained,Created a universe that isself-contained;

And expectshumans to becomeself-contained,Creating institutions that are alsoself-contained

The uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics implies that certain pairs ofquantities, such as theposition and velocity of a particle, cannot both be predictedwith complete accuracy. Following Feynman, quantum mechanics deals with thissituation via a class of quantum theories in which particles dont have well-definedpositions and velocities but are represented by a wave. These quantum theories aredeterministic in the sense that they give laws for the evolution of the wave with time.
http://www.philosophypages.com/ph/plat.htmhttp://www.philosophypages.com/ph/plat.htmhttp://www.philosophypages.com/ph/plat.htmhttp://einstein.biz/http://einstein.biz/http://einstein.biz/http://www.users.csbsju.edu/~frioux/interfer/FeynmanSumHistories.pdfhttp://www.users.csbsju.edu/~frioux/interfer/FeynmanSumHistories.pdfhttp://www.users.csbsju.edu/~frioux/interfer/FeynmanSumHistories.pdfhttp://www.fisica.net/relatividade/stephen_hawking_a_brief_history_of_time.pdfhttp://www.fisica.net/relatividade/stephen_hawking_a_brief_history_of_time.pdfhttp://www.fisica.net/relatividade/stephen_hawking_a_brief_history_of_time.pdfhttp://www.mendeley.com/download/public/19388621/5252850664/8c1915daae6d6712a99a0217c75c7c42de3e1cfc/dl.pdfhttp://www.mendeley.com/download/public/19388621/5252850664/8c1915daae6d6712a99a0217c75c7c42de3e1cfc/dl.pdfhttp://www.mendeley.com/download/public/19388621/5252850664/8c1915daae6d6712a99a0217c75c7c42de3e1cfc/dl.pdfhttp://www.mendeley.com/download/public/19388621/5252853544/077237bf7b65f914a4a6bf3ad365e9ef66826f4c/dl.pdfhttp://www.mendeley.com/download/public/19388621/5252853544/077237bf7b65f914a4a6bf3ad365e9ef66826f4c/dl.pdfhttp://www.mendeley.com/download/public/19388621/5252853544/077237bf7b65f914a4a6bf3ad365e9ef66826f4c/dl.pdfhttp://www.mendeley.com/download/public/19388621/5252886864/488aad9b755a24172990827172aefe9280ed8c31/dl.pdf%201.03http://www.mendeley.com/download/public/19388621/5252886864/488aad9b755a24172990827172aefe9280ed8c31/dl.pdf%201.03http://www.mendeley.com/download/public/19388621/5252886864/488aad9b755a24172990827172aefe9280ed8c31/dl.pdf%201.03http://www.mendeley.com/download/public/19388621/5252850664/5476293d24737e9b087bf174cbbd1d86d770f66d/dl.pdfhttp://www.mendeley.com/download/public/19388621/5252850664/5476293d24737e9b087bf174cbbd1d86d770f66d/dl.pdfhttp://www.mendeley.com/download/public/19388621/5252850664/5476293d24737e9b087bf174cbbd1d86d770f66d/dl.pdfhttp://www.mendeley.com/download/public/19388621/5252850664/5476293d24737e9b087bf174cbbd1d86d770f66d/dl.pdfhttp://www.mendeley.com/download/public/19388621/5252886864/488aad9b755a24172990827172aefe9280ed8c31/dl.pdf%201.03http://www.mendeley.com/download/public/19388621/5252853544/077237bf7b65f914a4a6bf3ad365e9ef66826f4c/dl.pdfhttp://www.mendeley.com/download/public/19388621/5252850664/8c1915daae6d6712a99a0217c75c7c42de3e1cfc/dl.pdfhttp://www.fisica.net/relatividade/stephen_hawking_a_brief_history_of_time.pdfhttp://www.users.csbsju.edu/~frioux/interfer/FeynmanSumHistories.pdfhttp://einstein.biz/http://www.philosophypages.com/ph/plat.htm


13/24

Thus if one knows the wave at one time, one can calculate it at any other time. Thismeans that the unpredictable, random element comes in only when the wave isinterpreted in terms of the positions and velocities of particles. But maybe that is themistake; maybe there are no particle positions and velocities, but only waves. By thede Broglie hypothesisevery object in our universe is a wave. Thus, phenomenawould be adequately defined by the following two, 2 properties of waves:

Position, andSize

And, given thesize, theposition would be determined. When this is combined withthe Platonianduality principle as operationalised in theduality series in operationsresearch, it would be sufficient to describe phenomena by the following two, 2properties:

Growth (Size factor), andDevelopment (Location Factor)

Development demands that theminimum requirement or Nurture, for the object ofinterest to exist, below which it would be impossible to bring it to being, isidentified; as well as the ultimate form orNature that it can take, beyond which itwould be futile to attempt further improvements. These define theboundary

conditions of the phenomenon, in real time. Withgrowth, it would be sufficient toidentify the item that creates the impulse, for the required growth between the two, 2points; as well as that which provides thesustenance, for the growth process. Theseare basis for monitoring and evaluation, to determine thesize and there after, thelocation of the wave-event or phenomenon. Serially:

This series would therefore adequately represent thenatural order, N-O against whichthepersonal order, P-Ois evaluated, to measure a personsperspective ofphenomena. Moreover, this is corroborated bythe perception model of mind, PMMfollowing which it would be sufficient to reduce phenomena into the five, 5 essentials.

3. Impulse,L1 Phenomenon2. Nature,A1 6. Object,A1. Nurture,A2 5. Form,L4. Sustenance,L2
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_wavehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_wavehttp://www.slideshare.net/peteranyebe/the-perception-model-of-mindhttp://www.slideshare.net/peteranyebe/the-perception-model-of-mindhttp://www.slideshare.net/peteranyebe/the-perception-model-of-mindhttp://www.slideshare.net/peteranyebe/the-perception-model-of-mindhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_wavehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_wavehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_wavehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_wave


14/24

Formally:

In this case, it is theobject component of the series that is described. Given aphenomenon therefore, after itspurpose orobject is identified,characterising thiswould at once outline thestandard procedure for making the phenomenon. Recallthat20%ters perform at task by the standard procedure. This defines them as self-

contained. They have adopted a perspective of phenomena that approximatesnoumena or theN-O exactly. They have approximated thepersonality of theCreator, in real time, within the limits of reality. This agrees with the principle inwhich the task of science is redefined to be the discovery of laws that will enable theprediction of events, up to the limits set by the uncertainty principle.

Theconcatenation modelis at the core of the simulation of thePMM. It is themental analogue of the Feynman sum over histories. It computes the contributions ofthe three, 3 components of the mind to thethought process, including the emotion,

P2 intellect,P3 and will, P4. Thus, given theSingle mindednessthat characterises a100%commitment to a purpose, forP1= 1, these components of the mind would befully engaged atP2 = 3,P3 = 9, andP4 = 27respectively. More items would berequired for personalities who are less committed, forP1 > 1. The scores on thesefactors increase fromthree, 3nine, 9 andtwenty-seven, 27respectively; ascommitment drops. Theconcatenation modelenables the evaluation of the

personalityfactor-F as the contribution ofentropy to the environment, according to

the observed deviance from thestandard procedure,noumena, orN-O.

Thefactor-F is also input to theneed profile, which measure thepower, Po that isavailable to theperson, P with which torespond, R tostimuli, S. Recall the

behaviour model, which conceptualisesbehaviour as a function ofresponse, Rstimuli, S andPersonality, P. This power draws from thesoul, S, which is actually amass ofenergy in storage. Soul is the concatenation of all theactivities of a person,from the first cry at birth to the last breath at death. Following Einsteins energymodel,95% of the mass of an atom is contributed by theactivities of quacks and

gluons, which contribute the remaining5% and 0% respectively.

f0 = 4(11/z),z = (41/f1)

f1 = Perception Index, N = 5f0 = Sensation Index, N= 1
http://www.slideshare.net/peteranyebe/the-concatenation-modelhttp://www.slideshare.net/peteranyebe/the-concatenation-modelhttp://www.slideshare.net/peteranyebe/the-concatenation-modelhttps://www.box.net/shared/f1aa2yobnpsikxof5dxrhttps://www.box.net/shared/f1aa2yobnpsikxof5dxrhttps://www.box.net/shared/f1aa2yobnpsikxof5dxrhttps://www.box.net/shared/f1aa2yobnpsikxof5dxrhttp://www.slideshare.net/peteranyebe/the-concatenation-model


15/24

Like thefactor-F, given thefactor-f0, the soulfactor-S is determined. Recall thatenergy is released when the atom is split. Recall also that by a law in algebra, when anumber is split in two, 2 the maximum value of the product of both parts is derivedwhen they are equal, forx = n, so that (x * x) = n2. Theblack box model, BBMformalises the process for the derivation of the standard procedure series. Given a

phenomenon, F it is split into two, 2 according to theduality principle to derive theform, L andobject, A components. These are further split to at once satisfy the

duality and wave principles, to deriveL1,L2 andA1,A2 respectively. It is the energythat is generated in this process that is measured on theF-Scale to evaluate thefactorsf0, S andF. The scale is presented formally as follows:

f0= 1/10Sn,Sn = XD

D = Abs |EB|X = G: G AX = A Otherwise

G = 5E

A = 5B

Effort, and thereforemotive strength, Cis generated according to thecommitmentto the purpose. This is expended in two, 2 directions, to derive the procedure forpurpose-fulfilment, and to counter the obstacles in the way, respectively as follows:

Learning: CWk = 11/3 * SContainment of detractors: CNd = Log C / Log 1/S

Then C = CWk + CNd, which predicts the characterfactor-Cat a correlation

coefficient ofC/C: r = 0.9754. Given the factors S, C, andFproductivity isadequately defined, according to the following model:

RES = RGT,

Nu 4Ps 20%

This is theproductivity model. While the factorsRESand RGTarebehavioural,NuandPs arephenomenological. The complementarity of the behaviour andphenomenology models is demonstrated on thecharacter modelpresented below:

f0 = Objectivity IndexSn = Score on the Item-n (n = 1 to 4)D = Observed DevianceX = Expected DevianceE = Expected Rank on Item-n

B = Observed Rank on Item-n

RES = Response to StimuliRGT= Appropriateness of ResponseNu = Number of Essentials IdentifiedPs = Position on the Pareto 80-20 Continuum


16/24

Thecharacter modelconnectsconsciousness tobehaviour, to describe the energy

transfer fromnature, throughhumans, tosociety. The transfer is achieved via thehuman mind. Thus, by thevalue creation model, it is the personssystem of valuesthat translate into thecreation of value. It takescommitment, effort, and themotive

strength to create value. And these are derived in measures, according to the valuesthat people hold. The value that is created is only a reflection of the values that are

held.The tangible is derived from the intangible; something, from seaming nothingness.

When people valuetalent, Rn & Pc;professionalism, Vc; and work, n therefore,this translates intopeople value, C;organisational value, ROI; and the value of the

business environment, EB. Given the appropriate values, all the energy that is

required forpurpose accomplishment is made available, asmotive strength; accordingto thecommitment and effort that the person makes. Commitment and effort aredefined by the factors S, C, andF. Recall that thefactor-S is thesoul, which isactually a reservoir ofenergy that is accumulated as the concatenation of all theactivities of a person, from the first cry at birth to the last breath at death. This energy

powers, Fbehaviour, according to the persons influence, Cand the entropy, F thatthey contribute to the environment; both of which determine theirdependability; asthe responses to stimuli become more appropriate, whichs analogue inHR is theperformance at task according to specifications, forRES RGT. Diagrammatically:

Stimulus

Attitude,AMotivation, F Rn

Pc Ability, f0Personality, F

Response

n

Given the factor-Pc,

Rn = 2Pc1 n = 1/C Pc2

C = (3Pc + 1)/4

F = Rn/n Vc = 2F - 1

Pc = PhenomenologicalCompression Index

Rn = Rationality Index

n = Standard Procedure IndexC = Character IndexF = Index of Personality

Vc = Index of Core Values

The Character Model
http://www.12manage.com/myview.asp?KN=2698http://www.12manage.com/myview.asp?KN=2698http://www.12manage.com/myview.asp?KN=2698http://www.12manage.com/myview.asp?KN=2698


17/24

Themodel of learning explains theconnexion betweenthought andbehaviour ingreater details. This is achieved with reference to mile Cous reduction of themental memory space into the following three, 3:

Theconscious memory, which relates to the intellectThe unconscious memory that works with the will, andThesub-conscious memory that the emotion uses

Givendesire, which derives from values and is resident in the emotion, it remainsdormant until adecision is made that converts it into apurpose to be achieved. Thenall the energy that is required is made available asmotive strength, according to the

commitment and effort that the person is willing to make. The mental activity isthen transferred to the intellect, where thepath orprocedure for purpose fulfilmentis plotted. All these are doneconsciously, and culminate in the measure of the

factor-F, as the procedure that is derived is evaluated against the standardprocedure. This is stored in thesub-conscious memory, where all such proceduresare domiciled, for future reference.

Values

Talent,Rn, Pc

Profession, Vc

Work, n

Value

People Value, C

Organisational Value,ROI

Value of the Business Environment,EB

Translation

Soul, S (Energy Reservoir)

Character, C(Motive Strengthor Effort)

Personality,F (Power or Influence;Entropy or Waste;

Faith or Dependability)

Rn

Vc nPc

S

C ROI, EBF


18/24

The distinction is made betweenreflexive and voluntarymotivatedbehaviours.When the procedure that is required for purpose fulfilment is already available insub-conscious memory, the conscious memory is by-passed, to create the analogueof reflexivity in the domain of purely voluntary motivated behaviours. Reflexes useprocedures that have been wired as part of the design of humans. These are stored inthe unconscious memory. They also include the procedures that drive the visceralsystems, including the circulatory, respiratory, digestive, excretory, reproductive,

endocrine, nervous, muscular, and skeletal systems. These are too sensitive to havebeen left for humans to craft. They approximate theN-O exactly, to becomestandards for the procedures that humans craft, which are then stored in sub-consciousoremotional memory. mile Cou suggested a relationship between the

conscious memory of the intellect, Fand the emotionssub-conscious memory, Lto the effect that the emotion, L is a square function of the intellect, F forL = F2.

Learning happens when procedures are derived, first, 1st time. It is accomplishedwhen the procedure is standardised, forNu 4. Then people are able toturn what

they know, into what they do. The detractors that obstruct the conversion will have

been overcome. The vagaries of the environment are overcome by levitation,whichs analogue in the learning process isappreciation, A1. This is when peopleshift from the preoccupation withappearances and rise above the Platonianobject,to perceive the essentials that define theforms of phenomena. Then they are able toput the correct value on phenomena, having imbibed the appropriate values.

Evaluation, A2andappreciation, A1 are actually inverses. They define the linkbetween the emotion, L and the intellect, F. To the extent that the will, A is able to

sustain levitation, to that extent the intellect is able to rule the emotion, to optimiseemotional intelligence. This isattitudinal, A, as formalised in the relationshipbetween the factorsA and C, for[A = 19(C1)]. When this conversion factor isapplied to mile Cous model, the human person is modelled in the followingrelationship:

This is therelativity model of humans, RMH.

L = LoveA1 = AppreciationA2 = EvaluationF2 = CharacterisationFn = ProcedurisationF = Faith

L = 1/A2 F ,A1 = 1/A2F2 = 1/Fn,


19/24

In the same way thatA1 andA2derive fromA, the factorsF2 andFn derive from a

fission, orsplitting of thefactor-F.Fn features in theduality modelas theconversion factor that linksforms, L andobjects, A forL = AFn. Recall that formsare domiciled in the emotion, L as procedures. Andobjects, A aredesires that havetranslated intopurposes by the decision of the will, A. When the will is a unity, forA= 1, the factor-Fn defines procedure, forL = Fn.

The following comment is typical of the advocation forsituational ethics:

Moral decisions and the circumstances evoking them are unique andunrepeatable, it is therefore impossible to apply universal laws

Given theN-O, and thestandard procedure, which respectively define andoperationalisenoumena, this position would appear to have become obsolete.

Morality connectsgoodness withrighteousness in the following dictum:

When it isRight;

Then, it is GoodEthical behaviour that isgoodcan only derive from an equivalent base inthoughtthat ismoralandright. This would be evidenced in the derivation of the standardprocedure. The only timeperspectives orprocedures can be said to berighttherefore is when they correspond to the standard of noumena. And humans arewired for this. The humanpersonality is aconstant, F to the extent that all humansare wired alike, with potentials and the necessary features for potential attainment.But to the extent that these are developed differently, humans would be valuedvariably. This thought is summarised in the series below:

Spirit is related tonoumena. It is the source ofmorals. It distinguishes humans fromanimals. It makes people bothreasonable andrational, but animals can only reason.While they can learn tricks, as in circus animals, the procedure is derived by thehuman teacher. Rational thought leads to the derivation of procedures. It is spiritual.

3. Maturity,MI Personality (Value)2. Position,Ps 6. RES1. Essentials,Nu 5. RGT4. Normalit ,NI

3. Thought Personality, F2. Rationality 6. Body1. Reason 5. Spirit4. Mind


20/24

Recall thatRn,Pc, Vc, and n quantify the system of values; which translate into C,ROI, andEB, all of which define value that is created equivalently; according to thescores on S, C, andF. Recall also that the consistency of this proposition isestablished on theproductivity model, which corroboratesRES andRGTwithNu and

Ps. The first pair of factors are behavioural and derive from the factors S and C. Thesecond pair are phenomenological and derive fromF. WhileF derives fromRn andn, S and Cderive fromRn andPc. Vc is predicted from thefactor-F. These factors

are summarised on thementality profile, presented below:

The factorsRn,Pc, Vc, and n are the input data for evaluating the others. They aremeasured on their various kits. Therationality kit, Rn-Kand thephenomenological

compression kit, Pc-Kare soon to be available on the internet, at the address,www.recommendations.com. The Vc-Kwhich measures the appropriateness of thechoice of professions ascore values is to be derived in collaboration with thevarious institutes that regulate the professions. The n-Kmeasures the performanceat task by the standard procedure and is derived uniquely for every organisation. Allthe other three, 3 factors may be predicted from thefactor-Pc. And for all the kits,theF-Scale is calibrated against a reduced standard, forNu = 4, rather thanNu = 5.The feasibility of these decisions is established by comparing the data fromMProfileTheoreticalandPc Recommend, andMProfile Code andRecommendations respectively.

10. F Reward9. Soul, S 12. ROI8. C 11. EB

1. MI PfI2. Po 6. Ps3.

RES/RGT 5. Nu4. NI

The Mentality Profile

1. MI = Maturation Index2. Po = Power Index3. RES/ RGT = Response /Appropriateness Index4. NI = Normality Index5. Nu = Index of the Number of Essentials6. Ps = Position Index7. PfI = Performance Index8. C = Character Index9. S = Soul Index10. F = Personality Index11. EB = Index of the Business Environment

12. ROI = Index of the Return on Investment13. Rw = Reward Index.14. Rn = Rationality Index15. Pc= Phenomenological Compression16. Vc = Core Values (Talent/Professionalism)17. n= Standard Procedure Index18. EFF = Effectiveness19. EFF = Efficiency20. CRD = Credibility

14. Rn CRD15.

Pc 19. EFV16. Vc 18. EFF

17. n
http://www.recommendations.com/http://www.recommendations.com/http://www.recommendations.com/


21/24

6.00 Concluding

Recall the distinction betweenEuclidean space-time and thereal space-time. This isanalogous to the Platonian distinction between the worlds ofform andobjectsrespectively. It is also the same as the distinction betweenmindandmatter. Buthumans are wired to operate in both worlds, when they use theirminds toappreciate

objects; and when theycreatively reduce forms into objects. In both cases, thethought process involved goes beyondreason, torationality. This ensures thatstandards ofmorality and ethics are sustained, for longevity.

Thestandard procedure resolves the seeming contradiction between these pairs ofinverses. Its construction starts out with the wave model, which is based on

Euclidean space-time; and ends withduality, to reintroduce thereal space-time.Then the two, 2 property wave modelthat is timeless becomes translated into thefour, 4 itemduality series that is useful in real time, albeit being characteristicallytimeless.

Sustainability is determined by the energy that is derived, according to the rigoursexpended in resolving the seeming contradictions posed byEuclidean space-timeandreal space-time,mindandmatter, as well asforms andobjects. This energy ismeasured on theconcatenation model, to fix thesize, Nu of the person, andtherefore theirposition, Ps on the Pareto 80-20 continuum. Then, those whoseconclusions and actions match the standards of noumena will be more likely tosurvive and reproduce; and their pattern of behaviour and thought will come todominate. Theconcatenation modeland its simulation are presented below:

Pc Rn n f0 P1 P2 P3 P4 Sum

1.64 2.28 2.13 0.5 1.83 4.66 13.97 41.91 62.371.58 2.16 2.05 0.52 1.83 4.65 13.96 41.89 62.34

1.65 0.74 1.36 0.44 1.84 4.68 14.03 42.09 62.641.34 1.09 1.56 0.98 1.16 3.33 9.98 29.94 44.421.18 1.09 1.36 0.97 1.21 3.41 10.24 30.71 45.561.69 2.61 2.06 0.42 1.84 4.69 14.07 42.21 62.811.28 4.41 2.53 0.1 2.68 6.36 19.08 57.23 85.351.66 3.57 1.26 0.25 2.04 5.08 15.25 45.75 68.121.4 2.39 1.19 0.42 1.85 4.7 14.09 42.28 62.922.65 3.1 1.89 0.51 1.83 4.66 13.97 41.91 62.361.32 2.2 1.1 0.45 1.84 4.67 14.01 42.04 62.571.8 2.6 2.35 0.45 1.84 4.67 14.01 42.04 62.561.95 2.89 2.55 0.42 1.85 4.7 14.09 42.27 62.912.85 2.74 2.81 0.63 1.78 4.56 13.67 41.02 61.032.33 3.66 3.08 0.35 1.9 4.79 14.37 43.12 64.182.6 4.7 3.7 0.26 2.02 5.04 15.11 45.33 67.493.64 6.29 4.89 0.25 2.05 5.09 15.28 45.83 68.255.37 7.29 6.03 0.34 1.91 4.81 14.43 43.3 64.45

Pc Rn n f0 P1 P2 P3 P4 Sum

1.64 2.28 2.13 0.75 1.66 4.31 12.94 38.83 57.741.58 2.16 2.05 0.76 1.64 4.28 12.85 38.56 57.34

1.65 0.74 1.36 0.72 1.69 4.39 13.16 39.49 58.741.34 1.09 1.56 0.99 1.11 3.22 9.67 29.02 43.031.18 1.09 1.36 0.98 1.14 3.28 9.84 29.53 43.791.69 2.61 2.06 0.71 1.7 4.41 13.22 39.66 58.991.28 4.41 2.53 0.55 1.82 4.64 13.93 41.79 62.191.66 3.57 1.26 0.62 1.78 4.57 13.71 41.13 61.191.4 2.39 1.19 0.71 1.71 4.42 13.25 39.75 59.132.65 3.1 1.89 0.75 1.65 4.3 12.91 38.72 57.581.32 2.2 1.1 0.72 1.69 4.38 13.13 39.4 58.61.8 2.6 2.35 0.73 1.69 4.38 13.13 9.39 58.581.95 2.89 2.55 0.71 1.71 4.42 13.25 39.74 59.122.85 2.74 2.81 0.82 1.55 4.11 12.33 36.98 54.982.33 3.66 3.08 0.68 1.74 4.49 13.46 40.37 60.062.6 4.7 3.7 0.63 1.78 4.56 13.68 41.05 61.083.64 6.29 4.89 0.62 1.79 4.57 13.71 41.14 61.215.37 7.29 6.03 0.67 1.75 4.5 13.49 40.46 60.18

Table-A: Theoretical Table-B: Empirical

m

Pm + 1 = 2 ( Pm ) + 1,m =1

P1 = F1

Theconcatenationmodelis the mentalanalogue of theFeynmansuperpositionandsum over historiesprinciple of the wavemodel
https://www.box.net/shared/f1aa2yobnpsikxof5dxrhttps://www.box.net/shared/f1aa2yobnpsikxof5dxrhttps://www.box.net/shared/f1aa2yobnpsikxof5dxrhttps://www.box.net/shared/f1aa2yobnpsikxof5dxr


22/24

Thus, in the same way that thebell-shape of thenormal curve which describes theN-O is an indication ofenvironmental determinism, thesymmetry that characterisesthis shape shows thatEuclidean space-time andreal space-time,mindandmatter,as well asforms andobjects are replicas. Like Stephen Hawking rightlysummarised:

We may regard our use of imaginary time and Euclidean space-time as merely amathematical device (or trick) to calculate answers about real space-time

Noumena,forms, andminds present avenues in atimeless,boundless, andselfcontainedenvironment; to find solutions thatmatter,objects, andphenomena createin real time because of their limiting effects. With respect toHR, given theN-O the

black box is defined for all systems, so that theF-Scale is a measure of howappropriately the black box has been reconstructed. Thus,metrics are now not onlystreamlined, but standardised for all organisations. Measures ofproductivity and

ROI,rewardand thebusiness environment, like the share capital and dividends, are

the same for manufacturing, services, information, as well as the extractiveindustries. More than this, a level play ground is created for the workforce.Engineers, accountants, HR, whether they are line or support staff; are evaluatedsimilarly, against thehumanity that each person brings to the table. The different

professions andjobs are only avenues for projecting the person.

In addition to these two, 2 observations, the units of measurement adopted for thesefew and generalise able metrics are the same. They are all rooted in thefactor-f0, ameasure of deviance from theN-O. The underlying principle is the same. Define the

contradiction; and then, resolve it. These measures actually predict what ought,

against which theactualis evaluated; forconsistency, and thereafter,optimisation.These requirerigour.


23/24

Nu = 5, butNu = 4.05 would be sufficient

When the reduction fromNu = 5 toNu = 4 is introduced and only thePc-Score isused forrecommendations, the requirements of theproductivity modelare stillsatisfied:

Pc Rn /n Vc S F C RES RGT ROI Rw EB Nu PfI MI NI CRD Nu'' Nu''' Po Ps

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.99 0.98 266666671.23 2.24 1.12 5. 1.01 0.9732 1.0 1. 4.05 24418.75 1.0 0.01.01 1.02 1.01 1.01 0.95 1.01 1.01 0.78 0.66 267.67 2.17 1.09 4.87 0.98 0.9898 1.0 0.94 1.59 24.11 1.0 2.611.02 1.04 1.03 1.03 0.92 1.01 1.02 0.73 0.62 134.33 2.12 1.06 4.69 0.97 0.989 1.0 0.91 1.32 16.87 0.99 6.121.03 1.06 1.04 1.04 0.9 1.02 1.02 0.7 0.6 89.89 2.07 1.04 4.53 0.97 0.9864 1.0 0.89 1.18 13.64 0.99 9.331.04 1.08 1.05 1.06 0.89 1.03 1.03 0.68 0.58 67.67 2.03 1.01 4.39 0.96 0.9833 1.0 0.88 1.09 11.71 0.99 12.281.05 1.1 1.06 1.07 0.87 1.04 1.04 0.66 0.57 54.33 1.99 0.99 4.25 0.96 0.9801 1.0 0.87 1.02 10.4 0.98 14.981.06 1.12 1.08 1.08 0.86 1.04 1.05 0.64 0.56 45.44 1.95 0.98 4.13 0.96 0.9768 1.0 0.86 0.96 9.42 0.98 17.471.07 1.14 1.09 1.1 0.85 1.05 1.05 0.63 0.55 39.1 1.92 0.96 4.01 0.96 0.9735 0.9999 0.85 0.92 8.66 0.98 19.78

1.08 1.16 1.1 1.11 0.84 1.05 1.06 0.62 0.54 34.33 1.89 0.94 3.9 0.96 0.9704 0.9999 0.84 0.88 8.05 0.97 21.921.09 1.18 1.11 1.12 0.83 1.06 1.07 0.6 0.53 30.63 1.86 0.93 3.8 0.95 0.9673 0.9999 0.83 0.85 8.05 0.97 23.91.1 1.2 1.13 1.13 0.82 1.07 1.08 0.59 0.53 27.67 1.83 0.92 3.71 0.95 0.9644 0.9998 0.82 0.82 7.12 0.97 25.751.11 1.22 1.14 1.14 0.81 1.07 1.08 0.59 0.52 25.24 1.81 0.9 3.63 0.95 0.9616 0.9997 0.81 0.8 6.76 0.97 27.481.12 1.24 1.15 1.15 0.8 1.08 1.09 0.58 0.52 23.22 1.78 0.89 3.55 0.95 0.959 0.9996 0.81 0.78 6.44 0.96 29.091.13 1.26 1.16 1.17 0.79 1.08 1.1 0.57 0.51 21.51 1.76 0.88 3.47 0.95 0.9564 0.9995 0.8 0.76 6.16 0.96 30.611.14 1.28 1.18 1.18 0.79 1.09 1.11 0.56 0.51 20.05 1.74 0.87 3.4 0.95 0.954 0.9993 0.8 0.75 5.91 0.96 32.021.15 1.3 1.19 1.19 0.78 1.09 1.11 0.55 0.5 18.78 1.72 0.86 3.33 0.95 0.9517 0.9991 0.79 0.73 5.69 0.96 33.361.16 1.32 1.2 1.2 0.77 1.1 1.12 0.55 0.5 17.67 1.7 0.85 3.27 0.95 0.9495 0.9989 0.79 0.72 5.48 0.95 34.62

1.17 1.34 1.21 1.21 0.77 1.1 1.13 0.54 0.5 16.69 1.68 0.84 3.21 0.94 0.9474 0.9987 0.78 0.71 5.3 0.95 35.8

Table-1:MPROFILE THEORETICAL


1.0 1.39 1.33 1.06 0.58 1.03 1.22 1.0 0.42 9.9 1.9 0.95 4.39 1.04 0.895 1.0 0.68 0.9 22505.02 0.99 12.281.01 1.41 1.35 1.06 0.58 1.03 1.23 1.0 0.42 9.61 1.89 0.95 4.36 1.04 0.894 1.0 0.67 0.9 22.51 0.99 12.731.02 1.43 1.36 1.06 0.57 1.03 1.24 1.0 0.43 9.33 1.89 0.94 4.34 1.04 0.893 1.0 0.67 0.89 15.92 0.98 13.171.03 1.44 1.37 1.06 0.57 1.03 1.25 1.0 0.43 9.07 1.88 0.94 4.32 1.04 0.8921 1.0 0.67 0.89 13. 0.98 13.61.04 1.46 1.38 1.07 0.56 1.03 1.26 1.0 0.44 8.83 1.87 0.94 4.3 1.04 0.8912 1.0 0.67 0.89 11.26 0.98 14.021.05 1.47 1.4 1.07 0.56 1.03 1.26 1.0 0.44 8.6 1.87 0.93 4.28 1.04 0.8904 1.0 0.67 0.89 10.08 0.98 14.431.06 1.49 1.41 1.07 0.55 1.03 1.27 1.0 0.45 8.39 1.86 0.93 4.26 1.04 0.8895 1.0 0.67 0.88 9.2 0.98 14.831.07 1.5 1.42 1.07 0.55 1.04 1.28 1.0 0.45 8.19 1.86 0.93 4.24 1.04 0.8888 1.0 0.66 0.88 8.52 0.98 15.221.08 1.52 1.43 1.07 0.55 1.04 1.29 1.0 0.45 7.99 1.85 0.93 4.22 1.04 0.888 1.0 0.66 0.88 7.98 0.98 15.611.09 1.53 1.45 1.08 0.54 1.04 1.29 1.0 0.46 7.81 1.85 0.92 4.2 1.04 0.8873 1.0 0.66 0.88 7.98 0.98 15.981.1 1.55 1.46 1.08 0.54 1.04 1.3 1.0 0.46 7.64 1.84 0.92 4.18 1.04 0.8866 1.0 0.66 0.87 7.14 0.98 16.351.11 1.57 1.47 1.08 0.53 1.04 1.31 1.0 0.47 7.48 1.84 0.92 4.16 1.04 0.886 1.0 0.66 0.87 6.81 0.98 16.711.12 1.58 1.48 1.08 0.53 1.04 1.32 1.0 0.47 7.32 1.83 0.92 4.15 1.04 0.8853 1.0 0.66 0.87 6.53 0.98 17.061.13 1.6 1.5 1.08 0.53 1.04 1.32 1.0 0.47 7.17 1.83 0.91 4.13 1.04 0.8847 1.0 0.66 0.87 6.27 0.98 17.41.14 1.61 1.51 1.08 0.52 1.04 1.33 1.0 0.48 7.03 1.82 0.91 4.11 1.04 0.8841 1.0 0.66 0.87 6.05 0.98 17.74

1.15 1.63 1.52 1.09 0.52 1.04 1.34 1.0 0.48 6.89 1.82 0.91 4.1 1.04 0.8836 1.0 0.65 0.86 5.85 0.98 18.071.16 1.64 1.53 1.09 0.51 1.04 1.35 1.0 0.49 6.76 1.82 0.91 4.08 1.04 0.883 1.0 0.65 0.86 5.66 0.98 18.41.17 1.66 1.55 1.09 0.51 1.05 1.35 1.0 0.49 6.64 1.81 0.91 4.06 1.04 0.8825 1.0 0.65 0.86 5.5 0.98 18.71

Table-2:Pc RECOMMEND

RES = RGT,

Nu 4Ps 20%
https://www.box.net/s/vhtuzhpaliqgqf55aj7khttps://www.box.net/s/vhtuzhpaliqgqf55aj7khttps://www.box.net/s/vhtuzhpaliqgqf55aj7khttps://www.box.net/s/0f1diqqjfo4c8daaxc83https://www.box.net/s/0f1diqqjfo4c8daaxc83https://www.box.net/s/0f1diqqjfo4c8daaxc83https://www.box.net/s/0f1diqqjfo4c8daaxc83https://www.box.net/s/vhtuzhpaliqgqf55aj7k


24/24

The empirical data is applied without the reduction, forNu = 5The productivity model is satisfied, butFor all the candidates,Nu < 4

This is stricter measure

The empirical data is applied with the reduction, forNu = 4The productivity model is satisfied, andFor two, 2 of the candidates,Nu 4This is more lenient measure


1.64 2.28 2.13 1.09 0.44 1.04 1.71 0.99 0.99 3.81 1.81 0.91 4.09 0.94 0.9729 1.0 0.64 0.74 3.06 0.98 18.22

1.58 2.16 2.05 1.07 0.45 1.03 1.67 0.96 0.95 4.0 1.86 0.93 4.29 0.94 0.9786 1.0 0.64 0.76 3.22 0.98 14.26

1.65 0.74 1.36 0.39 0.59 0.69 1.72 0.95 0.93 3.78 1.19 0.6 1.72 0.89 0.8934 0.914 0.68 0.61 2.46 0.86 65.651.34 1.09 1.56 0.61 0.61 0.8 1.48 0.82 0.78 5.13 1.19 0.59 1.7 0.91 0.8787 0.9106 0.69 0.64 3.24 0.85 66.01.18 1.09 1.36 0.75 0.89 0.87 1.36 0.89 0.53 6.52 1.34 0.67 1.91 0.74 1.0105 0.9442 0.88 0.64 4.6 0.88 61.721.69 2.61 2.06 1.33 0.39 1.16 1.75 1.04 1.03 3.67 1.45 0.73 2.64 0.94 0.9083 0.9918 0.64 0.65 2.66 0.93 47.151.28 4.41 2.53 1.88 0.11 1.44 1.44 1.36 1.04 5.56 1.0 0.5 1.47 1.05 0.7569 0.8578 0.47 0.6 3.25 0.83 70.631.66 3.57 1.26 3.07 0.25 2.03 1.73 1.21 1.07 3.75 0.8 0.4 0.84 0.98 0.7583 0.5961 0.59 0.52 2.01 0.68 83.281.4 2.39 1.19 2.17 0.38 1.59 1.53 0.93 0.88 4.78 0.98 0.49 1.21 0.96 0.806 0.7724 0.64 0.59 2.74 0.78 75.842.65 3.1 1.89 1.76 0.44 1.38 2.47 1.28 1.28 2.36 1.14 0.57 1.61 0.89 0.884 0.8932 0.64 0.55 2.74 0.84 67.721.32 2.2 1.1 2.16 0.4 1.58 1.47 0.89 0.81 5.27 0.99 0.49 1.21 0.97 0.8055 0.7749 0.64 0.6 3.03 0.78 75.711.8 2.6 2.35 1.13 0.41 1.07 1.83 1.08 1.06 3.4 1.73 0.86 3.72 0.93 0.9616 0.9998 0.64 0.69 2.73 0.97 25.64

1.95 2.89 2.55 1.16 0.38 1.08 1.95 1.16 1.11 3.11 1.67 0.83 3.48 0.93 0.9537 0.9995 0.64 0.66 2.52 0.96 30.392.85 2.74 2.81 0.97 0.53 0.98 2.63 1.34 1.22 2.23 1.12 0.56 1.54 0.85 0.9 0.8756 0.66 0.54 1.65 0.83 69.252.33 3.66 3.08 1.23 0.33 1.12 2.23 1.36 1.22 2.62 1.56 0.78 3.08 0.93 0.9374 0.9979 0.63 0.62 2.17 0.95 38.432.6 4.7 3.7 1.33 0.26 1.16 2.44 1.63 1.28 2.39 1.42 0.71 2.63 0.94 0.9031 0.9914 0.6 0.58 1.95 0.92 47.45

3.64 6.29 4.89 1.35 0.24 1.17 3.22 1.94 1.44 1.9 1.4 0.7 2.55 0.93 0.9113 0.9893 0.59 0.54 1.68 0.92 48.91

Table-4:RECOMMENDATIONS

Table-3:The MPROFILE CODE

Pc Rn /n Vc S F C RES RGT ROI Rw EB Nu PfI MI NI CRD Nu'' XTY Nu'' Po Ps

1.64 2.28 2.13 1.14 0.63 1.07 1.48 0.42 0.4 5.17 1.74 0.87 3.65 0.91 0.9836 0.9997 0.7 0.56 0.41 1.49 0.97 27.051.58 2.16 2.05 1.11 0.64 1.05 1.44 0.42 0.41 5.6 1.81 0.9 3.91 0.91 0.9917 0.9999 0.7 0.58 0.42 1.49 0.97 21.741.65 0.74 1.36 1.69 0.6 1.34 1.49 0.41 0.4 5.1 1.19 0.6 1.72 0.92 0.8771 0.914 0.68 0.5 0.41 1.49 0.86 65.651.34 1.09 1.56 1.7 0.94 1.35 1.26 0.54 0.39 8.84 1.28 0.64 1.7 0.69 1.0248 0.9106 0.93 0.61 0.46 1.49 0.85 66.01.18 1.09 1.36 1.58 0.92 1.29 1.14 0.61 0.42 15.81 1.35 0.68 1.91 0.8 0.9832 0.9442 0.91 0.67 0.5 1.49 0.88 61.721.69 2.61 2.06 1.53 0.59 1.27 1.52 0.41 0.4 4.86 1.29 0.64 2.01 0.92 0.8974 0.9559 0.68 0.51 0.4 1.49 0.88 59.721.28 4.41 2.53 2.49 0.47 1.74 1.21 0.44 0.5 10.52 0.91 0.46 1.03 1.0 0.7725 0.6969 0.65 0.49 0.47 1.49 0.74 79.381.66 3.57 1.26 4.67 0.53 2.83 1.5 0.4 0.4 5.04 0.7 0.35 0.61 0.94 0.7548 0.4553 0.66 0.43 0.4 1.49 0.57 87.861.4 2.39 1.19 3.02 0.59 2.01 1.3 0.44 0.45 7.67 0.84 0.42 0.85 0.95 0.7799 0.603 0.68 0.48 0.44 1.49 0.69 83.032.65 3.1 1.89 2.28 0.63 1.64 2.24 0.34 0.35 2.62 0.97 0.49 1.14 0.83 0.8791 0.7444 0.7 0.44 0.44 1.49 0.77 77.241.32 2.2 1.1 3.0 0.6 2.0 1.24 0.46 0.47 9.33 0.84 0.42 0.85 0.96 0.7756 0.6055 0.69 0.49 0.46 1.49 0.69 82.94

1.8 2.6 2.35 1.21 0.6 1.11 1.6 0.4 0.39 4.33 1.62 0.81 3.18 0.9 0.9693 0.9985 0.69 0.53 0.39 1.49 0.95 36.421.95 2.89 2.55 1.27 0.59 1.13 1.71 0.38 0.38 3.81 1.55 0.77 2.9 0.89 0.961 0.9962 0.68 0.51 0.38 1.49 0.94 42.052.85 2.74 2.81 1.82 0.69 1.41 2.39 0.33 0.35 2.44 1.15 0.57 1.54 0.79 0.9431 0.8756 0.73 0.46 0.34 1.49 0.83 69.252.33 3.66 3.08 1.38 0.56 1.19 2.0 0.35 0.36 3.01 1.42 0.71 2.45 0.88 0.9473 0.9858 0.67 0.48 0.36 1.49 0.91 50.952.6 4.7 3.7 1.54 0.53 1.27 2.2 0.34 0.34 2.67 1.27 0.64 2. 0.88 0.9196 0.9543 0.66 0.46 0.34 1.49 0.88 60.023.64 6.29 4.89 1.57 0.52 1.29 2.98 0.3 0.32 2.01 1.25 0.63 1.93 0.84 0.936 0.9463 0.66 0.44 0.31 1.49 0.88 61.45.37 7.29 6.03 1.42 0.56 1.21 4.28 0.26 0.31 1.61 1.38 0.69 2.32 0.79 0.993 0.9796 0.67 0.44 0.29 1.49 0.91 53.61
https://www.box.net/shared/u7ltkhdjhepp4fthoo14https://www.box.net/shared/u7ltkhdjhepp4fthoo14https://www.box.net/shared/u7ltkhdjhepp4fthoo14https://www.box.net/s/ux8jo7ry05lrceh3p2z2https://www.box.net/s/ux8jo7ry05lrceh3p2z2https://www.box.net/s/ux8jo7ry05lrceh3p2z2https://www.box.net/s/ux8jo7ry05lrceh3p2z2https://www.box.net/shared/u7ltkhdjhepp4fthoo14

Documents

The Mentality Profile, Toward an Economy of HR Metrics