16
The Mutualist Life of Bivalves Wendy Stickel EVPP Seminar on Mutualism March 4, 2010

The Mutualist Life of Bivalves

  • Upload
    kelli

  • View
    50

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The Mutualist Life of Bivalves. Wendy Stickel EVPP Seminar on Mutualism March 4, 2010. Some Basic Facts. Belong to bivalvia class of molluscs 30,000 species Include clams, oysters, mussels, scallops Very ancient and successful taxonomic group. Bivalve Anatomy. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: The Mutualist Life of  Bivalves

The Mutualist Life of Bivalves

Wendy StickelEVPP Seminar on Mutualism

March 4, 2010

Page 2: The Mutualist Life of  Bivalves

Some Basic Facts

• Belong to bivalvia class of molluscs

• 30,000 species

• Include clams, oysters, mussels, scallops

• Very ancient and successful taxonomic group

Page 3: The Mutualist Life of  Bivalves

Bivalve Anatomy• Two-part shell operated by

adductor muscles• Mantle covering soft body• Siphons pull in and release

water• Gills take oxygen out of

water, filter food and detritus, and circulate water

• Two palps extend from mouth collect and sort incoming particulates

Page 4: The Mutualist Life of  Bivalves

Distribution

• Marine• All depths• All latitudes• Most substrates-rock, sand, compacted

mud • Often dominant on coasts and estuaries,

also offshore sediments• Tolerate extreme environments (deep sea

vents)

Page 5: The Mutualist Life of  Bivalves

Ecological Roles

• Filter-feeder

• Bioturbator

• Bioengineer – reef and mat builder

• MutualistZooxanthallaeSeagrassesEpibiontsAnemones

Page 6: The Mutualist Life of  Bivalves

Cockles and Zooxanthallae• Fragum erugatum • Hypersaline waters in Shark

Bay, Australia• Densities >4,000/m2• Photosynthetic zooxanthallae

provide nourishment in return for stable environment and access to CO2 and N wastes

• Light-harvesting and light-filtering services (in some species) Source: Hickman 2003

Page 7: The Mutualist Life of  Bivalves

Mussels and Seagrasses

• Spartina alterniflora – perennial deciduous grass, saline-tolerant, builds up land at seaward edge of marsh

• Grass height, biomass, and flowering correlate with mussel (Conkensia demissa) density

• Experimental evidence:– Manipulated mussel density to observe effect on

Spartina biomass – Nutrient enrichment of sediment was important on

marsh flats but stabilization of substrate more important at marsh edge

Source: Bertness 1984

Page 8: The Mutualist Life of  Bivalves

Source: Bertness 1984

Page 9: The Mutualist Life of  Bivalves

More on Seagrasses

• Broadened findings to mussels (Mytilus edulis) and eelgrass (Zostera marina L)

• Western Baltic• Sediment porewater concentrations of

ammonium and phosphate doubled from mussels fertilization

• Fertilization affected eelgrass growth (largest fraction of nutrient demands met via roots)

Source: Reusch 1994

Page 10: The Mutualist Life of  Bivalves

Some limitations on seagrass-bivalve mutualisms

• Interference competition of eelgrass by mussels squeezing roots – space limitations? (Ruth 1991; Kobarg 1993)

• Interaction variable with non-native mussel (Musculista senhousia)– Effects ranged from facilitation to interference– Consistently impaired eelgrass rhizome

elongation rates (Reusch and Williams, 1998)

Page 11: The Mutualist Life of  Bivalves

Another benefit to seagrasses

• Bivalves increase structural complexity of habitat• Spaces between shells offer refuge for small

epiphytic grazers (gastropods, etc.)• Reduced predation on grazers increased grazing

from seagrass leaves=>increased light absorption

• Tested with Thalassia testudinum (turtle grass) and Modiolus americanus (tulip mussel)

Source: Peterson and Heck 2001

Page 12: The Mutualist Life of  Bivalves

Bivalve-seagrass mutualism

Source: Peterson and Heck 2001

Page 13: The Mutualist Life of  Bivalves

Clams and Epibionts

• Chama pellucida lives attached to shallow rock surfaces

• Covered by dense growth of sessile plants and animals

• Removal of epibionts increases predation on chama

• Chama likewise offers low-mortality habitat to diverse sessile biota

• Hypothesis that epibiont larvae preference for rough vs. smooth-surfaced substrates is selected for, increasing likelihood of interaction

Source: Vance 1978

Page 14: The Mutualist Life of  Bivalves

Some common themes

• Habitat alteration is central

• Conditional and dynamic– Contingent on broad processes rather than

particular species-specific characteristics– Powerful force in shaping community structure

• Need to look at in community context

• Factor in restoring/preserving ecosystem function

Page 15: The Mutualist Life of  Bivalves

How applicable to PRV?

• Species common to coastal conditions• Bring ecosystem services which are needed for

very disturbed environment– Filter-feeding– Increased rate of nutrient cycling– Reef and marsh building– Grazing of epiphytes– Light-harvesting and filtering

• Ability to manage environmental changes– Increased nutrient loading– Climate change impacts: sea level rise, erosion from

storm events

Page 16: The Mutualist Life of  Bivalves

Partial List of References• PETERSON, BRADLEY J. AND KENNETH HECK, JR.

Positive interactions between suspension-feeding bivalves and seagrass—a facultative mutualism MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, Vol. 213: 143–155, 2001.

• BERTNESS, MARK D. RIBBED MUSSELS AND SPARTINA ALTERNIFLORA PRODUCTION IN A NEW ENGLAND SALT MARSH' in Ecology, 65(6), 1984, pp. 1794-1807 6c) 1984

• VANCE, RlCHARD R A MUTUALISTIC INTERACTION BETWEEN A SESSILE MARINE CLAM AND ITS EPIBIONTS, in Ecology, 59(4), 1978, pp. 679-685 Cv) 1978.