The Mystery of Your Time

8/3/2019 The Mystery of Your Time

1/58

EIR January 20, 2012 Feature 27

December 25, 2011

At this moment, the immediate, existential issue o overriding importance

or society as a whole, and our United States in particular, is the growing

threat o a thermonuclear war which presently hovers, even at this present

moment, over the United States, as over the immediate targets in Eurasia.

The ailure, as in leading circles o the United States, to ace that reality, is

the state o cowardice which threatens to become the early end o us all or

this immediate uture. People who avoid the act o that reality, are posing

a grave threat to all humanity, including, personally, their own.In order to compact the essential elements o this report into aordable

space, the content o this report is, in its largest part, a descriptive presen-

tation o a roster o the identity o essential acts and, or the greater por-

tion, some o their more crucial details. The intent is to provide a needed

overview o a large and very important subject.

At the close o my national webcast o the early evening o September

30, 2011, I was presented with three successive questions bearing on cer-

tain crucial matters o science. Two o these three questions concerned the

crucial role o the notion o a principle ophysical time, as distinct rom

what is merely clock time.

The role o Time as I reerenced it on that occasion, is a positivelydetermining actor in mankinds scientic, and, thereore, also specically

physical-economic progress. This is the distinction which is to be located

in what is actually achievable by man, only through those specically

human, creative powers; these are powers which are typically expressed by

means o a well-ordered series o discoveries o physical-economic prin-

ciples.

These are principles which are to be dened, in each case, as neces-

sary violations o what have been, heretoore, the popular notions o

I Keep a promIse made on september 30:

The Mystery ofYour Time

by Ly H. Lruch, J.

EIRFeature


2/58

28 Feature EIR January 20, 2012

human sense-perception respecting what is merely the

clock time o such as Pierre-Simon Laplace.

Consequently, the only competent principle o econ-

omy, is that o what, or example, has been, until now, a

rarely encountered notion o physical time, rather than

that customary notion o a clock time located within

the bounds o a monetarists systemically mistaken

notion o economy. Thus, since the assassinations o

President John F. Kennedy and his brother Robert, the

latter then the Democratic Partys prospective Presi-

dential candidate or 1968, we have suered a persist-ing, withering trend o worsening ailures in attempts to

dene a sense o the direction o the case or a devolv-

ing U.S. physical economy.

The possibility or the resumption o an existence o

a viable orm o economy or today, depends on revers-

ing the recent nearly ty years o London and Wall

Street-directed, both moral and physical, long wave o

net decay within the trans-Atlantic world, in particular.

In the course o this present report I shall

explain the urgently needed, principled con-

siderations which I had presented on this

matter on the occasion o the past September

30.

Thus, during my reply to two indicated

questions on the subject o time, which were

raised during that event o this past Septem-

ber 30th, I had pointed toward the existence

o certain principles which I had indicated as

having a prooundly scientic importance in

and o themselves. I had pointed attention

toward those two particular questions o that

evening, only insoar as that particular occa-

sion itsel had warranted. However, those

questions, to which I had replied then, implic-

itly demanded a later consideration o certain

much more proound principles inhering in

those same subjects, as I shall treat thosedeeper matters, here, in the course o the ol-

lowing pages.

Those latter, now presently augmented

considerations, here, would require answers

to additional questions, questions or which

the included opportunities o that occasion

did not permit discussion in a relevant greater

depth at that time. The time allotted or that

occasion o September 30th, was then run-

ning out; nonetheless, I held mysel responsi-

ble to take such matters up publicly duringsome suitable, hopeully, relatively early uture time.

Now, that time has come.

Introduction:

On History & Creativity

As a result o an inherently systemic error which

is built into a widely popular reliance on the

notion o sense-certainty, people generally, in-cluding most among ostensibly well-educated

scientic and other proessionals and the like,

tend to premise their interpretation o experi-

ence according to the so-called popular opin-

ions allacious, pro-Euclidean olly o belie in a

merelya-priori sense o the alleged certainties

o what popular opinion would consider as being

merely clock-time.In the nal analysis, the sub-

EIRNS/Stuart Lewis

Lyndon LaRouche at his Sept. 30, 2011 webcast, in which he addressed theprinciple o physical time, as distinct rom what is merely clock time.


3/58

January 20, 2012 EIR Feature 29

ject o this report will turn out to have actually

been the subject o removing doubts respecting

the bounds o human mortality. Thus, what are

to be recognized as the worst disasters in the his-

tory o mankind, have been caused by neglect o

those available truths which the large majority

among even the privileged leaders in society, as

today, had not known, not known because they

had been pre-conditioned by the legacy o what

is known as the oligarchical principle, and had

not wished either you, or themselves, to know.

What would probably appear soon, even among

most o the current roster o those who are more or less

qualied as scientists, will be what I shall detail, in this

report, as a development in world economy whose

causes lie outside the domain o todays prevalent, but(as I shall demonstrate here), also a mistaken reliance

upon what are currently still conventional, but rela-

tively naive notions respecting some most crucial as-

pects o science as such. It is a problem, as I shall em-

phasize here, which inheres in a still widely spread,

blind aith in sense-perception.

Neither complexity, nor simplicity, is necessarily a

correlative o truthulness; nor are todays types o aca-

demic and related commonplaces to be taken or

granted as measures o wisdom. Nonetheless, what I

deliver to your attention in this report, involves concep-tions which, or many, will seem to be the most chal-

lenging subject-matters to be taken into account in re-

considering the subject-matters o the series o reports

presented as a unied package here. They will be in-

tended to supersede the incompletenesses o much o

that which I had already presented here earlier, in my

step-by-step approach to these subject matters over the

larger part o this present year to date.

It has been, and remains my intention here, to pro-

ceed by such steps, proceeding, as much as seems to be

easible, by progressive steps, steps which range romthe relatively less challenging, into the deeper, and, still

more challenging notions which mankind needs ur-

gently at this present time, in a time o a presently most

proound, most complex, and also most menacing,

modern crisis or humanity as a whole, until now.

I do this with a no less than compassionate under-

standing o the unavoidable diculties with which I

shall be conronting the reader, step by step, in the

course o this report. What I do, will have been done out

o a regard or the great practical necessity that this step

occur now: it is to be done with particular emphasis on

the increasingly ominous challenges now beore this

planet, including the immediate, British-led imperial

threat o a potential general thermonuclear war, a threat

which has now come to conront and consume us, per-

haps immediately, rom inside our United States and

beyond, since the close o August 2007.

Such has been the case, since the recent arrival o a

new, more critical phase in the already ongoing break-

down o the trans-Atlantic sector o the worlds econ-

omy, most notably a present phase which had been

transormed rom a preceding, hyper-infationary

breakdown-crisis o the trans-Atlantic system. This has

been a crisis which dates rom the inauguration o ve,

hyper-infationary months o what has already become

actually an initial phase o an hyper-infationary spiralwhich had been set into motion during late 2008, and as

the same olly has been continually worsened through

the present instance o an actual, essentially trans-

Atlantic breakdown-process. It is a breakdown whose

present center o gravity continues to be centered,

presently, in the so-called Euro system o a post-

Westphalian, virtually stateless system o governance

on the continent o western and central Europe.

These new phases in the development o that pro-

cess o rushing toward a breakdown crisis, as it is being

experienced in the United States, in particular, had beenset into motion through the actions taken in the U.S.

Congress to prevent the institution o my proposal or a

Homeowners and Bank Protection Act o 2007. The

result o that latter Congressional action, had been ex-

pressed by the ormal launching o the Anglo-Ameri-

can-led mass-insanity o the bail-out unleashed in the

closing months o 2008. Consider the entirety o the

trans-Atlantic region o the same orm as the articially

induced 1923 Weimar Germany hyperinfation, but,

now, this time, it signals the unleashing o a general

monetary, infationary breakdown-crisis on a virtuallyglobal scale.

Thus, the greatest part o the worlds trans-Atlantic

economy, is now to be seen in what had become its re-

cently, awully distorted orm assumed by a culture

which seems to have almost reached the brink o having

ceased to exist: it moves like a dead man stumbling in a

lantern-lit darkness, bearing a shovel with which to

bury himsel, as he, presently, stumbles orward, in the


4/58


Simplissimus

French troopsoccupiedGermanys Ruhrregion in January1923, whenGermany wasunable to meetreparations

payments.Headline: BlackBanners o

Mourning in theRuhr; caption:All or nothing.French capital

prevailed.

A German magazine (1918)denounces the British: The

English Dentist and theDutchman, with the

caption: I need your teethto make mysel new

dentures.

FIGURE 1

Weimar Hyperinflation in 1923:Wholesale Prices (1913 = 1)(logarithmic scale)

Jan. March May July Sept. Nov.

1,000

10,000

100,000

1,000,000

10,000,000

100,000,000

1,000,000,000

10,000,000,000

100,000,000,000

1,000,000,000,000

A worthless 50 million mark note.

Simplissimus

ashion which one

German cartoonist o

the early 1930s had

dubbed A Seventh-

class Funeral.

There are possible

remedies or this condi-

tion which we are expe-riencing in this process;

but, the remedies will not exist,

unless a set o those remedies is

based on a return to a system o sov-

ereign nation-states, as might be ad-

opted by a relevant bloc o respec-

tively sovereign, cooperating

nations, each and all employing, and

enjoying a commitment to xed-ex-

change-rate-based, physical-econ-

omy-based credit-systems amongthem. Those corrections must now

be employed, as i immediately, to

replace the presently unsalvageable,

world monetary system, which were

better identied as what may be

properly dened, interchangeably,

as oligarchical, or monetarist

systems.

The deep, primary causes or this

crisis, have been radiated rom, and

are lodged, virtually entirely, within the same, London-centered, trans-Atlantic, monetarist set o Wall Street/

London, merchant-banking swindles, swindles which

had, in earlier times, brought Adol Hitler to power in

Germany. These are the same types o swindles which

had, presently, produced a not dissimilar, but ar worse

orm o what is a presently, immediately threatened

combination o a global, trans-Atlantic, total nancial

breakdown, and also the imminently thermonuclear-

warare condi-

tions presently

being crated

and launched

under implicitly

genocidal popu-

lation-reducing directions rom Buckingham Palacetoday.

Thus, the present combination o a trans-Atlantic

monetary crisis, and the immediacy o the pending

launch o a global thermonuclear war which the British

empire intends to eect through its control over a men-

tally impaired, virtual new Emperor Nero, Barack

Obama, now presents us all with a presently immediate,

unprecedented quality o crisis or all humanity: a pres-


5/58


ently threatened, real-lie version

o an H.G. Wellsian Things-To-

Come variety o thermonuclear,

virtual extinction-crisis or man-

kind.

Indeed, so ar, since the clear-

cut act o the pre-calculated

murder o what had been an alreadycaptive, Libyan President Muam-

mar Qadda, the world has been

virtually hanging, rom week to

week, on the threat o the launch o

what would become, quickly, a

thermonuclear war extended to a

global scale, extended so by using

threatened attacks on Iran and Syria

as the chosen detonators employed

to create the giant explosion, to

bring on active hostilities to thepoint o the actual launch o a pres-

ently intended, thermonuclear

attack against no less than Russia

and China. Hence, what is currently

implied, is nothing less than ther-

monuclear warare with world-

wide consequences.

Only the immediate ouster, or a just cause, o an

insane President Barack Obama, as eected under the

provisions o Section 4 o the Twenty-Fith Amend-

ment to the U.S. Federal Constitution, would suce torender the outbreak o thermonuclear war almost im-

possible to be pulled o eectively. Without U.S. action

to that comparable, related eect, the clearly intended,

British orchestration o an intended thermonuclear

attack on Russia, China, and also others, would be a

considerable, near-term undertaking. It were no mere

coincidence that this threatened, most terrible o world

wars, should coincide with a British monarchical,

avowedly green intention, to reduce the worlds pop-

ulation, rapidly, and also suddenly, rom seven billions

to no more than one billion persons on this planet.As long as the Nero-like, British royal tool, Barack

Obama, were to remain President in act in the United

States, the greatest holocaust known to mankind pres-

ently, were almost certain. Without the complicity o

the U.S. government held under the virtual thumb o an

Obama Presidency, the London-centered launching o

that threatened thermonuclear war, were not a likely

prospect or a strategically credible undertaking by any

set o other powers.

Presently, the causes or

Obamas immediate removal rom

oce are already massive and

clear. Two options, appropriately

adopted as concerted eects, pres-

ently exist. Under Section Four o

the Twenty-Fith Amendment to

the U.S. Federal Constitution,

Obama is ripe to be considered or

removal on grounds o mental dis-

qualications. He has committed

repeated violations o his oath o

oce, violations which warrant

summary removal rom oce. In

addition to that, his mental and

moral disabilities not only warrant,

but require his prompt suspension

and probable removal rom oce.Otherwise, the probable outcome

would actually be, or most o us,

the terribly inevitable.

The Issue o the New WarSo-called world wars, are, by

their special nature, oligarchical

wars, as we might consider the Peloponnesian War or

its own time as an example. Such wars are those which

are ought, as imperial wars, to the intended conclusion

o the crushing o one, or both the principal parties tothe verge o a mass extinction. Thermonuclear wars are

wars which would now proceed, by their oligarchical

natures, up to or beyond extinctions, as all British wars

against relatively great powers since Paolo Sarpis in-

tended Thirty Years War, and the later British model

o a Seven Years War have done, inevitably, since the

original model o a British empire was brought to its

successul conclusion with that Peace o Paris which

established the British East India Company o Lord

Shelburne as an empire in act.

As Frederick the Great had come to recognizemuch later than he would have liked in retrospect, that

Seven Years War has been the actual, prototypical

model or the recurring practice used or each and all

British imperial strategy rom the time since the wars

launched by the New Venetian party o Paolo Sarpis

ollowers, a Sarpian model o cases including the pre-

Westphalian Thirty Years War, and including the in-

tended, British-created, imperial, post-Westphalian,

Barack Obamas Presidency poses thethreat o a real-lie version o Things toCome, the 1936 lm written by H.G.Wells, with a global war that results in thevirtual extinction o mankind.


6/58


anti-Westphalian conspiracies o the British empire still

today. The Frederick who had thought he had ought the

right war or the right purpose, lived to discover, and to

regret, the act that what he had actually won, was the

creation o the original British empires power over

continental Europe,that, in act, to the present day!

In the case o the current British Empire, which was

established in act by the February 1763 Peace o Paris,all British imperial warare has been premised on the

essential principle o a design modeled on the Anglo-

Dutch (i.e., New Venetian party) model o the Seven

Years War which Britains Lord Shelburne had won, to

lure a Germany whose Kaiser had loved his own British

imperial cousins all too well, in the case o that so-

called World War I, to bring Germany into joining

and losing a First World War or which the British

empire should have been the party closed down or

much-needed parental corrections.1

In act, the present British imperial policy whichLondon has already imposed upon continental western

and central Europe, has been identied, with utter

shamelessness, as a post-Westphalian system, a

system which is intrinsically a colonial branch o what

is known presently as a system o stateless gover-

nance, a system o governance which Britain has

imposed upon those continental European, ormerly

sovereign nation-states, now being degraded, at least

or this moment, to the governanced status o captive

British puppets.

In the meantime, relevant infuential, institutionalorces within the U.S.A. have, ortunately, recently in-

duced a temporary delay o President Obamas eorts

to bring o a new world war according to a thermonu-

clear orm o the Thirty-Years-War model depicted by

Friedrich Schillers Wallenstein Trilogy. Neverthe-

less, despite any urther delay, the strategic situation

around this planet remains more than merely critical.

Only by a reusal by the U.S.A. to permit British

puppet Barack Obama to continue to proceed reely

with the kind o operations set into motion by the pres-

ent-day replay o the old Sykes-Picot operation used toset o World War I o the British East India Companys

Fabian agent Alexander Helphands Permanent War,

Permanent Revolution, could some o us have pro-

vided the means by aid o which a certain group o na-

tions has so ar blocked the presently intended, British/

1. See the note appended to this report as a whole on the subject o the

lessons to be adduced rom the so-called Franco-Prussian War.

Obama series o actions leading quickly into general

warare. It will, or would be a kind o warare which

had been intended to be launched as soon as the British-

led war-making party were certain that Muammar Qad-

da were securely and suddenly dead. The delay in car-

rying out such British-led action against civilization,

were, or the present moment, just that, merely delay.

Saner, hopeully temporarily minority orces, withinthe United States and Israel, respectively, have played a

key role in delaying, thus ar, the detonation o what

could quickly become assuredly thermonuclear war-

are. The combined roles o both Russias President and

Prime Minister, have been that o crucially important

participants in the attempted blocking o the launching

o what could become, virtually automatically, the

worlds rst, and perhaps nal, thermonuclear war, a

war-policy modeled on the late, proessedly paci-

cist Bertrand Russells 1946 declaration o his loudly

asserted intention to set o a preventive nuclear wardestruction o the Soviet Union.

In any case, the present monetarists hyper-infa-

tionary crisis, now spread throughout the trans-Atlantic

region, has already more than exceeded the limits or

sustaining the continuation o the present, trans-Atlan-

tic bail-out program. The Euro system is now past

the point o ripeness or threatened disintegration; a

return to a system o European continental, systemi-

cally sovereign nation-states, is now urgent and exis-

tentially so.

The key or understanding this situation is to beound in the urgently needed reorms in the worlds

present economic-nancial situation, especially the

threat o a breakdown-crisis originating as centered in

the British imperial system. I explain the crucial point

on that account, as ollows.

How Britain Ruined the United StatesThere are many actors and stages mixed into what

is to be recognized as included in the process leading

out rom that London-steered assassination o U.S.

President John F. Kennedy, which made possible theruinous, 1964 launching o the intentioned ruin o the

U.S.A. through a practically decade-long war in Indo-

China. That war has shown itsel to have been a prece-

dent which, in turn, has led the U.S.A., and thereore

the trans-Atlantic region generally, into what has

become that general, monetarists breakdown-crisis

which entered its intended concluding phase with the

repeal o President Franklin Roosevelts 1933 Glass-


7/58


Steagall Law, the same law on which the U.S.A.s cru-

cial role in the deeat o Adol Hitler, or example, had

depended.

It was the intrinsically hyper-infationary measures

leading up to the recent decades repeal o the Glass-

Steagall Law, which had provided the way or those vir-

tually treasonous measures under the rabidly anglo-

phile successors o one-time Adol Hitler backer

Prescott Bush whose amily tradition was to be ex-pressed, through the George H.W. Bush and childish

prankster George W. Bush, Jr. (the stand-in comic role

or what was actually the Dick Cheney Administra-

tion), which cleared the way or the beginning o that

trans-Atlantic monetarists break-down crisis on stage,

which has presently reached the present condition o a

general monetary breakdown crisis o the trans-Atlan-

tic banking systems under Londons puppet-President,

the Barack Obama Administration.

I have had a special kind o crucial personal, patri-

otic role o opposition during that more recent phase othat Bush-league process o nastinesses and pseudo-

patriotism, in my uttering my July-August 2007 drat

or a Homeowners and Bank Protection Act. That Act,

had it not been blocked, would have prevented the all

into the British trap set by Lord Rothschilds interna-

tional banking practices, the trap which was to become

known as that bail-out process which has led into a

breakdown which has reached its virtually terminal

stage or the trans-Atlantic nancial

system, a point o virtual breakdown

which was being reached, during the

most recent weeks, when the so-called

Euro system had entered a state o

worse than mere preparation o its own

early disintegration.

This trans-Atlantic breakdown-pro-

cess, had been the special circumstances

arranged through the role o a raud by

the British empires launching, through

the agency o Britains lying Prime Min-

ister Tony Blair, o a new Iraq War

pushed by the British imperial interests

under silly President George W. Bush,

Jr. This pattern was continued and then

greatly aggravated under what has been

in act a singularly unpatriotic, actually

British Royal agent, the PresidentBarack Obama, whose personal mental

characteristics have been shown, most

abundantly, to be those o a virtual duplicate o a new

Emperor Nero.

So, in such a manner, a virtual psychopathological

replica o the worst o Emperor Nero, the U.S. Presi-

dent Barack Obama who is both a puppet-President,

and a nasty-puppet-on-strings o the British monarchy,

has brought the world to the brink o a plunge into ther-

monuclear warare, by aid o a Libya adventure which

had prompted the hastened murder, with Obamas clearbacking, o an already captured President Muammar

Qadda o Libya. A murder o a Muammar Qadda al-

ready taken captive, murdered or the political conve-

nience o a guilty, and probably treasonous (were he not

already insane) U.S. President Barack Obama.

The intended murder o President Qadda had been

scheduled to clear the way or launching those attacks

on Syria and Iran, which were, in turn, intended to be

the reactivated spirit o Sykes-Picot detonators or,

rst, an incident plotted against Syria and Iran, which

was intended, in turn, then to serve as the pretext ordetonating thermonuclear attacks against targets in-

cluding Russia, China and other selected Eurasian tar-

gets o British imperial-directed general thermonuclear

warare, and or unlimited murderous measures to be

taken against U.S. nationals which a Nero-duplicate

Obama and his cronies might happen to dislike.

Fortunately, so ar, the proverbial saner leading ele-

ments in the U.S. military, Israel, and Russia, most no-

London steered the United States into the war in Indo-China, which led to thesocial and economic breakdown that we still suer rom today. Here, a napalmstrike erupts in a reball near U.S. troops in South Vietnam, 1966.


8/58


tably, have acted to delay what

had been the intended, reckless

and capital thermonuclear as-

saults on Russia and China, but

that or who, presently, knows

how much longer.

A British empire, exerting its

Obama-puppet control over theUnited States, could not tolerate

a relatively prospering set o

Asian nations not being de-

stroyed, under the conditions, at

the same time, that the trans-At-

lantic region was being plunged

by British-led interests into its

presently on-rushing, and almost

terminal stage o breakdown-cri-

sis. The only means by which

that awkward intention could beaccomplished, would be thermo-

nuclear attacks on Russia and China, among other re-

gions o a Eurasian set o nations.

In the meantime, the ongoing trans-Atlantic hyper-

infation has reached beyond limits o control. The crit-

ical point was reached with the death o President Qad-

da, and now with the monetarist system o, most

apparently, western and central Europe, collapsing out

o control under the crumbling o the post-Westpha-

lian design intended or a system o captive European-

continental puppets, all o them operating under thepresently turned-questionable prospect or British

Euro control over the post-nation-state system, called

governance, o a system o British colonies over the

region o continental Europe and beyond.

My Economic ReormsAs I have pointed out above, this new phase o the

process o a breakdown, had been set actively into

motion through the actions taken in the U.S. Congress

to prevent the institution o my proposal or a Home-

owners and Bank Protection Act o 2007. The result othis intervention rom the U.S. Congress, was expressed

by the ormal launching o the Anglo-American-led

mass-insanity o a process o bail out which was un-

leashed during the closing months o 2008, and contin-

ued with utterly boundless mass-insanity, by members

o the U.S. Congress, among many others, up to the

present date. The entirety o the trans-Atlantic nan-

cial-monetary system, is now gripped by a general,

monetarists breakdown o the trans-Atlantic region,

through the same kind o ormulations as were used to

launch the articially induced 1923 Germany hyperin-

fation, but, this time, the unleashing o a general mon-

etary breakdown-crisis on a virtually semi-global scale,

or perhaps, global scale.

To begin that unavoidably turbulent journey on

which the evidence o this present report and its inher-

ent passions have taken us this ar into the pits o Hell,

I orewarn the readers that the remedies or that crisislie, in act, under the subject-heading o the potential o

that specic expression o the human species potential

immortality, which is intimated as that same implied

question o immortality which challenges the reader o

the Apostle Pauls First Corinthians 13.

The crucial relevance o that latter subject-matter,

as identied here, is, that, under todays conditions,

when the susceptibility to believe is concentrated in the

sucking quicksands o sense-certainty, the prevalent

orms o belie tend to assume the orm o what is, in

act, a certain, systemically vicious error. This is a kindo error o oversight, the like o which, in certain past

periods o history, has oten had horrid portents or

mankind generally, but even many such past miseries

must seem relatively mild, when compared to the mon-

strously greater horror o those thermonuclear bom-

bardments immediately threatening civilization in this

prooundly troubled present time.

Exactly that threatening state o aairs, is now man-

Government of the Russian Federation

The British Empire and its puppet in the White House are targeting Russia and China ordestruction because the prospect o a Eurasian alliance or economic cooperation anddevelopment threatens their imperial control. Here, Russian Prime Minister Vladimir

Putin and Chinese Prime Minister Wen Jiabao in Beijing, Oct. 11, 2011.


9/58


kinds immediate, political-economic situation, at a

time when we are presently conronted by the immedi-

ate threat o more or less global, thermonuclear extinc-

tions, as that has been set into its present motion, by

what appears to be the hand o the British Empires

oolish, and habitually enraged, Emperor Nero-like,

U.S. puppet-President Barack Obama, today. It must be

said, o these matters, that humanity has a ar greaterimportance, and consequent obligations in our locality

in the universe, than most among our citizens have yet

even begun to know.

These are, thus, times, in which certain well-dened

types o undamental changes must be introduced to the

economic practices o our present nations, including

our own U.S.A. most emphatically. Our presently con-

tinuing investigation, both as to how we came here, and

where we must go, impels our attention deep into the

relevant elements o past, present, and uture history,

including those o present and uture physical science.Some measures are immediately obvious; but we have,

apparently, still ar to go, i we are to bring on truly du-

rable cures.

Chapter I: The Actual Human

Mind

The most urgent o the categories o subject-matters

which this report requires o me, pertain to certain pro-

oundly misleading categories o intention which mightappear to have been built into the designs o human

sense-perceptions.

The rst o these mischances which I shall address

in the beginning o this rst chapter, is the category o

what is airly identied as clock time, as that is typi-

ed by the argument o Pierre-Simon Laplace.2

The resulting, second error, alls, in eect, into the

category o the role o the customarily troubled ontolo-

gies in the misapprehensions respecting the nature, and

the use o language.

The problematic eature o each o those guiltyunctional categories locatable within the ranges o

sense-perception, is centered in a ailure built into a

troubled physical unction associated with the cus-

2. There are two Pierre-Simon Laplaces to be considered here. One is

Laplace as a physicist; the other is a mathematician pretending to be a

physicist, as in the tradition o Euclid, the mere descriptions o orm

pretending to be substance, which is what we are considering here.

tomary notion o time adopted by such charlatans or

that occasion as amazingly perverse Pierre-Simon

Laplace.

The rst error is expressed by the allacies associ-

ated with the particular unctions o what are customar-

ily identied as the human sense-perceptions. The

second is the notion o the related notions o organiza-

tion associated with the allacies which are inherent inthe mistaken notion o the organization o what is con-

sidered, customarily, as space-time as such.

The crucial matter o distinctions, is that o the qual-

iying distinction o physical space-time rom what is

no more than physical time.3 For example: a higher rate

o action is equivalent to an arrival in a dierent place

in the generality o physical space-time. We require, or

example, the dumping o the ontological category o

space, and redening o the notion o time, as this

is already implicit in the work o Max Planck, Albert

Einstein, and relevant others.Reerence the notion oa rate o physical energy-

fux density as an address o ones state o existence, as

alert scientists sensed it necessary to introduce distinc-

tions o such likenesses since the implications o the

distinctions o a state o nuclear-ssion relative to the

respective chemical, thermonuclear usion, and mat-

ter-anti-matter states, as a comparable approach is

suggested in the implications o the concluding sec-

tion o Bernhard Riemanns 1854 habilitation disser-

tation. The matter to be compared, in the case o evo-

lution among living species and classes o species, isthe dierence between dierent rates o activity, di-

ering species, and o states among other categories o

both living, and not-living processes, plus V.I. Ver-

nadskys crucial denition o a nosphere. Compare

such cases with dierent species o energy-fux den-

sity among qualitatively diering qualities o energy-

fux-density unctions in categories o social-eco-

nomic processes o varying degree in respect to their

qualitative development. Think o variability within

3. The inclusion o the term space in respect to the common use o theterm space-time by me here, is merely nominal. Space as such, does

not exist. It appears as a result o the ailure to comprehend the physical

implications o time. The actual origin o much o the problems o sim-

ilar types, is to be blamed on the observers ailure to recognize the

errors o presumption inherent in a literal belie in the measuring o

the experience o sense-perception as such. That point is prominent

among the crucial ontological issues o distinction o the ailings in-

herent in the subjective nature o sense-perception as such, when the

act to which the sense-perception is reerred in reality, is not taken into

account.


10/58


the bounds o distinguishing categories o develop-

ment, rather than a mere dierence in degree o de-

velopment.

Human economy, or example, involves the notion

o leaps rom one state o development to another, as

a distinction rom a change within the denition o the

bounds o variation o a specic quality o a common

state o development. Development rom one categoryto a higher species o category o development, has the

implied eect o a species-jump. The role o qualita-

tively dened states induced by the use o qualitative

steps in scientic progress on Earth, or in constantly

accelerated, decelerated voyages, points in the same

general directions. This is a pattern which is common-

place in actual economies.

In terms o economy, as that subject was touched

upon in the September 30th treatment o the subject o

physical-economic progress, this was located by me

then and there below the level o a species-jump; theleap rom one species-level to another, is a qualita-

tive leap o ontological implications, rather than a

degree o a xed quality o change. Mans experience

with the travel to as modest a choice o destination as

that located in accelerated-decelerated travel over in-

tervals such as to and rom Mars, would leave a strong

suggestion o such classes o experience to those who

comprehend even the presently ormally reported e-

ects o such movements.

Those general qualities o categories, when each is

treated as a single subject, serve us as a key to under-standing, and correcting the habitual notions o the e-

ects o the unctional distinction o perception rom

the object being experienced as the eect o sense-per-

ception on the mental-sensory unctions.

On History & CreativityIn my Introduction to this present report, which I

had named On History and Creativity, I had empha-

sized, summarily, the need to ree the human mind rom

so-called popular opinions pro-Euclidean olly o

belie, a notion o belies based on a merely a-priorisense o the alleged certainties o what the intrinsic

errors o popular opinion would adopt as being merely

clock-time.

As I had set orth the basis or the ollowing re-

marks, as I had done in the course o developing this

present report up to the point o opening this present

chapter, the olly o the popular opinion on which La-

place had premised his celebrated, but oolish doctrine

respecting time, is both his reusal to recognize the real-

ity o a principle o physical time, and his silly enthu-

siasm or his own avowed anity to the outright hoax

o both The Second Law o Thermodynamics and o

Euclidean innity. By pointing out these exemplary

problems, I have intended to emphasize their relevance

to the challenge o dening the access to the proo, that

the sequence o events o worldwide importance, must

take into account the eciency ophysical time, rather

than what is, comparatively, the eectively silly Eu-

clidean-like notion o clock time.

That was, in brie, the ostensibly hidden implica-

tion o my replies to two o the questions posed to me

during the closing portion o the national webcast o

this recent September 30. I now carry those subject-

matters to the undamentals which lurked behind myanswers to two o the three questions posed to me on

that earlier occasion.

By physical time, I have signied a measure o the

notional rate oeciently physical creativity in deter-

mining the relativity o a physical outcome measured in

terms o change o rate o physical eect during an ex-

perience o a passage o what we regard, mistakenly, as

merely clock time. This distinction, which I rst ad-

opted as a ormal notion o physical-economic time,

was then employed by me as expressing the character-

istic o the conception othe relative rate onet physi-cal-economic progress o an economy treated as a pro-

cess o qualitative development o physical economy

over a lapse o apparent time. I have called this physi-

cal time, as to be strictly distinguished, rom here,

onward, rom being merely clock time.

My argument here has a signicant basis in actual

history, a history which, in the relatively short term,

now begins, step by step, as ollows.

By physical time, I have signifed ameasure o the notional rate oefciently physical creativity indetermining the relativity o a physicaloutcome measured in terms o changeo rate o physical eect during anexperience o a passage o what weregard, mistakenly, as merely clock

time.


11/58


My Original Economic ForecastIn light o the act, that I have rejected statistical

orecasting methods as being intrinsically incompetent

substitutes or any truly competent scientic under-

standing in and o themselves, it should be clear that I

have no great anity to the statistical methods which

remain prevalent practice in what is oolishly misla-

beled as being economic orecasting. Yet, in act, Ihave the absolutely best o the known records in major

cases o strategic qualities o economic orecasting or

the U.S. economy at any time since my rst public, pro-

essional orecast laid down in late Summer 1956. The

dierence is, that what I practice is an excellent sort o

relevant science: as many embittered veterans o the

August 1971 crash remembered with pain since their

rather uncertain steps to intend to return to their busi-

ness or relevant academic quarters throughout the re-

mainder o that year, and rather ar beyond.

That just-stated act has the most proound implica-tions or every leading nation o the world at this pres-

ent moment o impending thermonuclear warare. To

explain the principles involved in such orecasting, I

shall present a paragraphs worth o explanation o this

apparent paradox here, in advance, and then proceed to

what readers might consider as a hard synopsis o my

rst eminently successul venture o that sort, in a cru-

cial orecast o what virtually broke out as a sudden,

deep, and somewhat prolonged, rst post-World War II

U.S. recession (actually a depression), which broke out

into the open at the close o February 1957.Customary orecasting, as adopted or most leading

economists and their markets, creates the actual causes

or their customary ailures in that proession, as a con-

sequence o the act that the customary, but usually

ailed method or orecasting, still today, is statistical:

depending upon orecasting what might seem to be the

pathways o the uture, by ollowing the ootprints let

by the past. That means, that such orecasting begins

with the inherent incompetence o proceeding rom cal-

culating what is expected to happen, based on statistics

rom the past, rather than approaching the matter roma truly orseeable basis in the intellectual reshness o

the actual uture.

About the past, there is little one might be able to

accomplish. Seeking the uture in the relics o the past,

is or dupes and kindred sorts o intellectual ailures.

Admittedly, o course, I, too, use evidence rom the

past in my own successul orecasting. The dierence

is, that most others read the ootprints o the uture

while dreaming o a uture copied rom the past; I relied

on the evidence o the direction o, not the ootprints o

where the man has walked, but the combination o both

o those ootprints where the man has walked, and

whither the eect o that intention is leading him in

what he imagines he is walking toward, oten without

his knowledge o his actual choice o direction; it is the

mere dream o the past itsel which oten prevails in

shaping his judgment. Many people, or example,

dream o being rich, or the like. They desire to be rich,

or powerul, or something in the direction o either, or

both. I put my trust in doing that which will be bene-

cial or society, relying on the durable advantage ound

in what I gained as my own oreknowledge, as, or ex-

ample, my adopted emphasis on coming to gain a reli-

able insight into both the wrongness o Euclid and, the

contrary, wonderul and important implications o Ber-

nhard Riemanns habilitation dissertation, which

became the cornerstone o my memorable achieve-ments as an economist in the practice o orecasting.

My exceptional success in my aorestated orecast,

in late Summer o 1956, o the major so-called reces-

sionactually a depression,which erupted exactly as I

had orecast,at the close o February 1957, is an ex-

cellent case in point.

My presently long-standing proession as a physical

economist has been situated within the domain o phys-

ical economy, as distinct rom the silliness o the use o

the inherently mistaken methods o nancial account-

ing, especially when they have been used as a monetar-ists countereit as a substitute or a competent approach

to the uture o a real economy. The uniqueness o my

successes in economic orecasting, as compared over

the span since Summer 1956, with a record o the rela-

tively consistent ailures o leading orecasters, and

leading governments, otherwise, has had absolutely

nothing accidental in it. That point is made most clearly,

when the emphasis is placed on physical-economic

considerations, as I have done, rather than a typical

monetarists statistical-accounting practices, the latter a

practice whose application is, commonly, either basedupon, or even claimed to have been based upon statisti-

cal-nancial and related methods. My earliest and com-

pletely successul, rst general orecast made or the

U.S.A. economy, during the interval 1956-57, and

beyond, adequately states the essentials o the case.

As I have just stated, my rst national-economic

orecast or the United States, was developed during the

Summer o 1956, where it emerged in the orm o my


12/58


orecast or an unusually steep and proound U.S. re-

cession, more appropriately identied as virtually a

depression, which was located during the February-

March passage o 1957 and its downstream atermath.

That recession had, then, actually happened in the late

February-early March location o 1957, exactly in re-

spect to the timing, characteristics, and evident causes,

which I had orecast.

The studies which led into the orecast which I hadmade, or late-February/early-March 1957, during

August 1956, were premised, in respect to variables,

primarily, on my studies or the U.S. automobile pro-

duction and related marketing processes during the

1954-1956 interval. I had used the cases o other major

elements o mass-marketing o hard goods sold on ac-

count o loans, or comparison with the evidence o

marketing o sales o new and used automobiles on

multi-year credit.

Later, ater the disaster in the in-

dustry had happened, automobile

manuacturers moved in the direc-

tion o adopting the changes in

types o accounting systems

not ar distinct rom the cardi-

nal points o reorms which I

had stressed most emphati-

cally during the course o

1954-57, but they then went

on to make new crucial mis-

takes, instead.

The study on which my

orecast had depended, had been

prompted by a coincidence be-

tween a study, launched by me in

1953, and based on the opening

paragraphs and more extendedclosing sections o Bernhard Rie-

manns 1854 habilitation disserta-

tion, and a study by me which had

been provoked, earlier, by the

prompting o perturbations shown

or the steel industry which had to

be noted as a matter o policy

during that earlier time as a decline

which I had then attributed to the

eect o a clearly maniest set o

destructive, anti-Franklin Roos-evelt policies which expressed the

legacy o the pro-British trends in

economic policy practiced under the Harry S Truman

Administration.

The marketing and credit policies under the Truman

Administration and its atermath had quickly become,

early on, an obvious source o what were, in large

degree, an intentional set o oten intentionally chosen,

but looming economic and social disasters: all done to

the clearly intended eect o a British intention to

weaken a U.S. economy whose strengths were deemeda threat o Franklin Roosevelts superior intellectual

and moral advantages relative to the inherent deca-

dence o the British imperial system. The pathological

developments, since the inauguration o President

Harry S Truman, in the trend o U.S. policy governing

public and private credit in the marketing o the com-

bination o new and used automobiles during that

time, had already been indicative consequences o

Riemanns Crucial Insight

From Bernhard Riemanns habilitation disserta-

tion, On the Hypotheses Which Lie at the Foun-

dations o Geometry, translated by Henry S.

White, in David Eugene Smith, ed., A Source

Book in Mathematics (New York: Dover Pub-

lications, 1959):

It is well known that geometry presupposes not

only the concept o space but also the rst un-

damental notions or constructions in space as

given in advance. It gives only nominal denitions

or them, while the essential means o determining

them appear in the orm o axioms. The relation o these

presuppositions is let in the dark; one sees neither whether and in how

ar their connection is necessary, nor a priori whether it is possible.From Euclid to Legendre, to name the most renowned o modern

writers on geometry, this darkness has been lited neither by the mathe-

maticians nor by the philosophers who have labored upon it. The reason

o this lay perhaps in the act that the general concept o multiply ex-

tended magnitudes, in which spatial magnitudes are comprehended, has

not been elaborated at all. Accordingly I have proposed to mysel at rst

the problem o constructing the concept o a multiply extended magni-

tude out o general notions o quantity. . . .

[In conclusion:] This path leads out into the domain o another sci-

ence, into the realm o physics, into which the nature o this present

occasion orbids us to penetrate.


13/58


the pro-Churchill, pro-Wall Street, Truman

legacy.From the beginning, Wall Street maven and

Senator, Harry S Truman had entered the Vice-

Presidency as the malicious opponent o that Pres-

ident Franklin D. Roosevelt, who witting patriots zeal-

ously hoped would outlive the completion o his ourth

Presidency. Unortunately, Roosevelt did not live long

thereater, and the worst that could be expected to

happen, happened: Winston Churchill owned whatever

passed or Harry Trumans political soul, and that was

evident to the man who had been the head o the war-

time OSS, Donovan, the same who had let the visit tothe Presidents Oce, shortly beore President Roos-

evelts death, saying Its all over. I the eects o the

change, ater Franklin Roosevelt, to the policies o

Truman, had not been the ruit o virtual treason, what

was?

The Presidencies o Dwight Eisenhower and John F.

Kennedy did what they could, and a good share more;

but both President Kennedy and his brother Robert,

were not permitted to live long enough to

remedy what the British monarchy and Harry

S Truman had already done to ruin our United

States.

For example, consider the specic, early

ailures in the national domestic economic

policy o President Dwight Eisenhowers

Administrations already disastrous Eco-

nomic Advisor Arthur Burns. These were ail-

ures which were centered

in the incompetence o

the policies expressed by

what would become

Burns later, continued

role as a policy advisor

to ocial Washington,

through to the time o the

Richard Nixon Adminis-

trations great collapse othe U.S. economy, which

struck in August 1971. It

was the uniqueness o my

1966-1971 steady ore-

cast o what became the

August 1971, Nixon Ad-

ministration crash, which

caught the inevitable at-

tention to what had been

already my consistent

record o unique compe-tence as an economic

orecaster, since Summer

1956.

I had conducted the studies on which my unique

orecast o the 1957 crash had been based, during a

period rom the middle through late 1950s, based

largely on my investigations which were then based

chiefy in what soon became my position as an execu-

tive in a large management consulting rm. That inves-

tigation, which was conducted during the period o the

Eisenhower Administration, continued under other aus-pices over the course o time leading into the virtual

world-ranging breakdown o the existing trans-Atlantic

monetary system in that August 1971, which was both

the time o my unique recognition as a leading eco-

nomic orecaster in the matter o the August 1971 col-

lapse o the Bretton Woods system, and a source o pain

to those leading economists who had all totally missed

the boat in that matter.

LaRouches uniqueorecast o the NixonAdministrationsAugust 1971destruction o the

Bretton WoodsSystem let othereconomists dazed.Shown are the

LaRouchemovementsnewspaper o Aug.30-Sept. 3, 1971,and LaRouche(1973). EIRNS

The critical point is thedepreciation o the dollar withrespect to the world market.That is o particularly criticalimportance or an imperialisteconomy struggling to expandits activity in the same worldmarket. It is o even greaterimportance when one considers

that the collapse o the dollarwould result in the immediatecollapse o that same worldmarket. The critical point or theeconomy is the point at whichdomestic infation presents theU.S. nance capitalists with aninternational monetary crisis.Denite signs o precisely sucha crisis occurred during andollowing the 1957 recession.That is what made the recessiona turning point in world history.

Lyndon LaRouche(pen name Lyn Marcus), 1961


14/58


That collapse had three outstanding

causes. First, the 1957 crash whose em-

bittering eects lingered on in that state,

until a time within the early days o the

Presidency o John F. Kennedy, when an

economic recovery was nally, i tempo-

rarily under way. Second, the immediate,

depressive eects o the assassination oPresident Kennedy. Third, the assassina-

tion o Senator Robert Kennedy, which

brought ormer Vice-President Richard M.

Nixon into the Presidency, setting

the pattern or the downturns which

ollowed, into the abysmal Obama

Presidency which has ollowed

since. Even a President o promise

could do no better than resist the

continuation o the pattern o de-

clines which ollowed the assassi-nations o the two Kennedys. The

deeat o the SDI and the atal aair

o the olly o the ideological mis-

judgments which caused the avoid-

able olly o the O-Ring disaster,

signaled the character o the trend which had remained

in charge o the ate o the Presidency, since the combi-

nation o the eects o the assassination o the two Ken-

nedys, as the death o President Franklin Roosevelt had

already destroyed so much o what he had launched or

intended earlier.Meanwhile, under the conditions o the middle to

late 1950s, the quality o the perormance o the auto-

mobile industrys quality-control practices plum-

meted, while the speculative orgies in the marketing o

new and used automotive vehicles, and in related pro-

duction and marketing practices, progressed, and con-

tinued so, despite the progress o the space program,

and in the reorms o the John F. Kennedy Administra-

tion, reorms which had had the eect o having been

introduced to reverse regrettable developments in

the heritage o the Harry Truman Administration,onward, despite the act that the longer-term ten-

dency toward cultural decadence since the death o

Franklin Roosevelt, was still under way in develop-

ments proceeding rom the category o a doubtul, to a

virtually lunatic practice o a system o nancial man-

agement which had been accelerated into the relative

stratosphere o the marketing o automobiles (new

and used alike).

However, despite all that, the ailures in the U.S.

economy o the 1950s, such as that o the 1957 crash,

had coincided with the arrival o the contrary trend o

an economic stimulus in the United States which

erupted rom within the Eisenhower Administration, a

benecial economic stimulation introduced as the eco-nomic ater-shock which came as a stimulating by-

product o the Soviet launching o the challenging ap-

pearance o Sputnik. It was that latter shit which

prompted the late 1950s surge associated with the coor-

dinated, international roles o President Dwight Eisen-

hower, President Charles de Gaulle, and the Chancellor

o West Germany, Konrad Adenauer. It was the deeat

o Vice-President Richard Nixon by Presidential candi-

date John F. Kennedy, the seemingly perpetual, at-

tempted assassinations o Charles de Gaulle, and re-

lated developments culminating in the 1963assassination o President John F. Kennedy, combined

with the post-Kennedy Indo-China war, which set into

motion the long-term down-turn, per-capita in the U.S.

physical economy.

It is important, that some additional acts, rooted in

the ruinous passage rom the Franklin Roosevelt Ad-

ministration, into a descent into the disgusting Truman

Administration, be emphasized in connection with

The Sputnik shock o 1957provided benecial stimulationto the U.S. economy or a time.

Let: a Soviet technicianne-tunes the Sputnik satelliteprior to lito.

NASA


15/58


16/58


not exist, and, in act, never did.

There is little that is more oolish, and also a more

likely cause o a persons willul sel-destruction, than

blind aith in the apparently obvious popular belies

and practices, in which the credulous have been in-

duced to believe.

The root o the illusion (or, delusion) in popular

views on the subject-areas to which I have just reerred,must be recognized as requently located explicitly in

the a-priorism o an Aristotelean-Euclidean delusion,

the delusion which is the expression o an implicitly a-

priori set o notions o space, time, and matter, as this

point-in-act is illustrated by my unique success, then,

in orecasting the deep recession which broke out in

February-March 1957.

Speaking pedagogically, as I have already empha-

sized in this report, the notion o an a-priori existence

o space as such does not exist. An apparently similar,

not unrelated allacy o presumptions, is conronted inthe assumed case o time as in and o itsel. Physical

time exists in a certain manner o speaking; but, that

must be what could be airly regarded as a physically

ecient expression o action measured against both

lapse o time and the changes in energy-fux density

o that action taken in time. The notion o clock time

as dened according to such gures as Laplace, should

have been dumped, on precisely these premises.

Once the elements o a-prioristic presumptions

have been placed to one side, the variable density o

action and the eect o the changing rate o density oaction on the notion o time, have eliminated the rea-

sonable standing or any remnants o the worse than

worthless Laplaces a-prioristic presumptions respect-

ing the notion o physical action as compared with

simple time. What I have employed with more or less

consistency over the recent sixty years, has been a

notion o physical time as a unied notion o a principle

o action. One may oten wonder, which were the more

destructive, that which people do not know, or what

certied authorities in nominal expertise, oten induce

the earully weak or simply credulous to believe.While such considerations as those which I have

just indicated, are denable in terms o relatively uni-

versal physical time, the ull impact o the signicance

o those words is essentially specic to human behav-

ior. The specic quality to be considered on this ac-

count, is the need o a notic principles role as a prin-

ciple o action specic to human behavior. We should

have learned rom returning attention implicitly to the

subject o the ormer auto industry o the 1950s, on this

account.

The Subject o Energy-Flux DensityAmong all presently known living species, only the

human mind is qualied or expressing actually notic

(Vernadskyan) characteristics in behavior, notably in

the willul character o the variability o the eects oincrease o energy-fux density in human social behav-

ior. The human body is not immortal, but the unique

ruits o human creativity are potentially immortal.

That point which I had just made in the preceding

sentence, is to be emphasized as expressing a uniquely

human characteristic which is capable o expressing the

determining role o eects o productive employment

o increased energy-fux-density in society on the po-

tential quality o human existence in society. Indeed, it

is the case, that we must expect, as rom a true disciple

o the hoaxster known as the Prophet Laplace, whathas been a specically entropic decrease, over about a

hal-century, in the productive powers o labor, that in a

society which has been ultimately aected by means o

a ailure to apply the required potential o a relative in-

crease in net energy-fux density to a better than cur-

rently existing, or higher level o application o prog-

ress in technology.

Societies will undergo deterioration in the produc-

tive powers o labor, as a result o a xed level o ap-

plied energy-fux density (i.e., zero technological

growth). Zero-growth economies are inherentlyailed economies, already acing a threatened, aggra-

vated rate o decline. We, in the trans-Atlantic region,

have sometimes experienced a long wave o what, in

net eect, is simply physical decline, or even, as pres-

ently, now prospective, and actually currently acceler-

ating, pro-environmentalist waves o devastating

human collapses and other signs o extinctions.

In act, a culture which does not exhibit upward

trends in eective increases in energy-fux density, will

soon show itsel to us as a probably doomed society, as

the history o Europe has demonstrated that act in whathas been sometimes described as a recurring Rise and

Fall o the Roman. . . empires, rom the rst accession

o Caesar, to the general collapse in the trans-Atlantic

region now in progress under the current British Empire

today, as with all other expressions o the Roman em-

pires and their known consequents, now.

Such latter types o results may occur in terms o

relative (ups and downs), or as absolute declines. The


17/58


ultimate standard or measurements o causes and e-

ects, is the rise or decline o potential relative popula-

tion-density, as dened relative to a relatively xed

standard o living or a relatively xed level o popula-

tion and its rates o reproduction over time.

Thus, the lessons which should be adduced rom

what I have identied as the characteristics o the just-outlined case o the 1953-1957 interval o accelerating

infation in the automotive and related industries. Such

declines have been sometimes resisted or a time, even

periodically, to say the least. In retrospect, no compe-

tent economists, as dened by a reasonable standard o

proessionalism, could competently deny the eect o

my unique successes in the matter o the sudden and

steep U.S. recession o the late 1950s, nor today; but,

the act o my successul orecast o the Summer 1971s

steep decline in the U.S. physical economy, has proven

itsel to be the herald o a decline which has persistedwithout an actual reversal in that long-term trend, as

this has been expressed, in relevant eects o trends

over the interval rom 1971, into the new crash which

had arrived, as I had orecast, during the late 1980s, and

the plunge into a persisting wave o systemic eco-

nomic breakdown-crisis since the onset o the George

W. Bush, Jr. Administration, and the wildly accelerat-

ing steepness o a virtually terminal plunge into doom

under the Barack Obama Administra-

tion.

Unortunately, according to the

actual record, the typical practice in

economic orecasting in process now,

has been o a post hoc, ergo propter

hoc variety, as this was emphasized

repeatedly by the ghosts o the cel-

ebrated German motion picture Das

Spukschloss im Spessart (1960).

The Doom o Laplace as SuchTake into account, as an impor-

tant example or us to consider in that

light, the inherent incompetence o a

widespread blind aith in clock

time, as that oolish belie had not

only been promoted by the errant

Pierre-Simon Laplace himsel, but,worse, as his oolishness on this ac-

count had become deeply embedded

in the stinking, greenish quicksands

o what is, presently, both a popular,

and also an utterly raudulent version o scientic

opinion, today.

The particular argument on behal o the olly o

both Laplace and o those who have shared his regres-

sive antasies, has been ridiculous, especially so when

their common ollies are considered in light o what

have been the contrary true insights into the knowledgeshared among those modern, pace-setting scientists

typied by such ollowers o Bernhard Riemanns pio-

neering role as Max Planck, Albert Einstein, and also,

most notably, the V.I. Vernadsky who taught scientists

to ll themselves with both lie and the uniquely human

power or genius.

The work o that latter pair o Planck and Einstein

(and o others o kindred persuasion) had inaugurated

the competent science o the Twentieth Century in their

courageous opposition to the principal rauds o that

century, as those rauds are typied by the most typi-cally evil cases, as that is illustrated by the Austrian

Schools Ernst Mach, and Machs putative, and worse

successors, such as the British Empires Bertrand Rus-

sell, and the richly deserved notoriety o Russells quan-

tum-theory lackeys at the 1927 Solvay Conerence.

That summary piece rom history taken into ac-

count, we must locate the root o our argument or this

occasion, by considering the crucial case or the true

It is the willul nature o the conception o physical time, writes LaRouche, ratherthan clock time, which, essentially, distinguishes the eects o competent humanbeings rom beasts. Salvador Dali, whose grotesque painting The Persistence o

Memory (1936) is shown here, ailed to put himsel in the ormer category.


18/58


beginnings o all that has been the specic competence

o that original modern science which had been ounded

by the genius o Cardinal Nicholas o Cusa, and the im-

plications o these matters rom the vantage-point o

the crucial eatures o the work o such bench-mark g-

ures as the book-end-like gures o modern sciences

Bernhard Riemann and V.I. Vernadsky, as I address this

crucially important matter under the subject-matter oChapter I here.

On the subject o this matter as a subject o Euro-

pean history, it is to be noted that, excepting the sheer

genius o Charlemagnes revolutionary achievements

in statecrat, and his collaboration with Haroun al-Ras-

chid, in their time, there is not much good to be said,

strategically, in the proverbial nal analysis o the

European and neighboring regions statecrat o nations

and peoples existing prior to Europes Fourteenth-cen-

tury New Dark Age.

Indeed, to the extent that scientic practice today iscentered on the legacy o the great modern polymath

Nicholas o Cusa and his ollowers, theirs is a legacy

within modern European science which represents a

tradition without any important rival in European his-

tory since the Classical Greek history leading into the

work o Plato and such among his ollowers as the no-

table Eratosthenes. The genius o the principal ollow-

ers o the work o Cusa and his ollowers in modern

science, through the infuence o such moderns as his

ollowers, Kepler, Leibniz, their ollowers, and the

great V.I. Vernadsky, is as Percy Bysshe Shelley wroteo his own colleagues in his A Defence of Poetry.

Thereore, to understand the roots o what we are

today, we should now look back a ew centuries. Look

back to the great genius rom the time o what was

named The Golden Renaissance o the time o Cardi-

nal Nicholas o Cusa. Cusa, in his time (A.D. 1401-

1464), had exposed the raudulent character o what

would become the variety o popular silliness embod-

ied, later, in the modern reductionism o the dupes o

that charlatan known as Bertrand Russell.

Cusas own achievement as the outstanding gurein the ounding o modern science, had been shown in

its most concentrated, wholesome expression, by his

De Docta Ignorantia. Something in the likeness o his

judgment had been already oreseen, in signicant

degree, among others such as Cusas relatively senior

contemporary Filippo Brunelleschi, and as what would

become the somewhat overlapping, later achievements

o Brunelleschi and Cusa, achievements which would

be echoed, in some crucially signicant degree, by such

as Johannes Kepler. It has been Cusas method in phys-

ical science, which had been explicitly derived rom

Brunelleschi, Cusa, Leonardo da Vinci, and others,

which is echoed in those great advances in science to be

recognized in the outcome o Keplers own, absolutely

crucial, uniquely original discovery o the universal

principle o gravitation. The implications o Keplers

discovery, however denied by the corrupt or merely

credulous, still today, go into the very deep roots o all

competent scientic practice today.

In one view o that matter, Keplers greatest, unique

accomplishment in all physical science to date, had

been his discovery o what has been named as the prin-

ciple o gravitation. In act, although Keplers discov-

ery o the principle o gravitation, was a unique master-

piece in its own right, as I shall emphasize here, Keplers

own greatest achievement lay in his earlier discovery o

the universal discovery o the principle o metaphor,metaphor as the principle o that which moved the stars

and all which we have customarily regarded as be-

neath: the application o the universality o the physi-

cal principle o metaphor, was heralded by his notion o

a vicarious hypothesis. Keplers discovery o gravi-

tation, depended crucially on his expressed application

o what is, in practice, the absolutely universal quality

o the intrinsic humanity o the physical principle em-

bodied within Classical poetic metaphor.

Later, in Chapter III, we shall uncover the crucial

connection o this specic notion o metaphor to theunction o physical time to be counterposed to the no-

tions o Laplace.

To continue this report on some o the most crucial

matters o science, as we must also present the truth o

his achievements or students and others today, we

must now, also, put away the desire to revive certain

garbage produced by certain rom Keplers notable ad-

versaries rom later times.

The Sequence To Be Chosen

What I have just stated here this ar, is perectly truebeyond reasonably competent objections. Despite that

act, the popular mind o much o what is even purported

scientic opinion today, is polluted to extremes by,

chiefy, what is to be recognized as the eects o drilling

and grilling o dupes into adopting what have been the

prevalent, specically oligarchical traditions o sundry

ancient through present-day cultures. Such is that con-

troversy which I am addressing, at this moment, as being


19/58


a certain confict respecting the choice o alternative

pathways in the ordering o the steps which I, as author,

must preer as a subject-matter to invade at this juncture.

The consequently implied question is: shall I pro-

ceed, pedagogically, henceorth, by presenting, rst,

the presently popular, but incompetent eatures o pres-

ently dominant traditions rooted in the heritages o oli-

garchical cultures, or, as an alternative, should I pro-ceed directly to a presentation o the truthul argument,

which I already know as an argument which must re-

place the inherently oolish belies, respecting such

subject-matter, which are associated with the custom-

ary traditions and present classrooms or today?

For me, the truth is too much purely creative un to

permit it to be avoided. The remedy to which I have just

reerred above, the principle o Keplers unique discov-

ery o a principle o gravitation, must step in.

1.1The Enemies o KeplerI have chosen it here (or, perhaps, it has chosen me),

to emphasize a direct attack which uses Keplers proo

based on the conclusive method o metaphor, as, im-

plicitly, Albert Einstein had, clearly, also done later,

using the principle o (in act) what is actually the phys-

ical-scientic principle o metaphor, this time, as the

keystone which must now be imposed upon all design

o standards or establishing anything truly competent

in the sense o nality within scientic method. The

method which I shall employ in this report or that pur-

pose, rests upon speculation, but also crucial evidence.I shall proceed accordingly, through application o the

method o the principle o metaphor, as the required

method o attacking directly the principled errors em-

bedded in the relatively more signicant output o those

who have played a leading part in establishing what

should be regarded by us, as the relevant reigns o error

in science, and the like in the abused name o truly

Classical art, today.5

5. For my purposes, I have divided the subject o human knowledge

according to a hierarchy o the organization o human knowledge,which begins, rom the top down, with the principle o metaphor, on

which well-organized knowledge depends. The practiced expression o

the principle o metaphor, has two subsidiary qualities o leading ex-

pressions, which are, respectively, oremost, Classical artistic composi-

tion, and, then, physical science. All respectable other expressions are

refections o all three o the above. Albert Einstein, I suspect most

strongly, would have agreed. As I shall have demonstrated at an appro-

priate later point in this report, there is an ironical quality o wasteul-

ness in premising the notion o metaphor on use o a spoken language. I

shall clariy that matter in due course.

For example: consider the contrary opinions o

some among Keplers most outspoken, reductionist op-

ponents, which are rather prominent even in contempo-

rary academic lie today. They, the credulous, have

oten continued to express themselves in manners coin-

ciding with the sundry willul rauds utilized by those,

such as the most typically evil Bertrand Russell, who

remain the most signicant representatives rom amongthe opponents o both o, typically, the likenesses in

spirit and practice o Cusa, Leonardo da Vinci, Kepler

and Gottried Leibniz, and also, o those, later, typical

opponents o reductionist dogma who are typied by

Bernhard Riemann, Max Planck, Albert Einstein, and,

in a most crucial way, V.I. Vernadsky, up through this

present time.

A Babylonian Priesthood Said No!I reer you to the act which had once not only

shocked, but astonished me, in my recognition o thenumber o what I knew as usually gited physicists and

other highly regarded scientists, who ell into even col-

lective rage-ts at the mere mention o the name o Jo-

hannes Kepler; worse, they were each, in such cases,

also impassioned devotees o the dogma associated

with the name o the silly charlatan, Isaac Newton!

These were mistaken, but not all were bad people.

Ordinarily, I admired the work o many o them as

both persons and scientists, most o the time. However,

they had also been taught, unortunately, that they had

better not risk their careers and amily incomes alike,by saying unpleasant words about the disgusting swin-

dler known as Isaac Newton. Even some rom among

the best and otherwise most courageous scientists, even

many o impressive rank, have been included, usually,

as o the types who have been incapable o rejecting a

standing academic order to kiss the butt o Newton pub-

licly, or to rerain rom ridiculing the silly and thor-

oughly raudulent decree o such as the hoaxster and

mathematician Rudol Clausius Second Law o Ther-

modynamics, or Laplaces doctrine publicly.

The roster o the opponents o Cusa and o Cusasollowers through such o those ollowers o Cusas ini-

tiatives as Riemann, Planck, Einstein, and Vernadsky

today, should include a list o such representatives o

the oligarchical cults, a list which includes the Venetian

hoaxster and hater o the then deceased Nicholas o

Cusa, the same Francesco Zorzi (a.k.a. Giorgi) who

played a key role as a top-ranking Venetian spy in the

crating o the personality o, and political infuence


20/58


over Englands disastrous Henry VIII.

More than a century later, Venices unscrupulous

Cartesian Abb Antonio Schinella Conti, had served in

his own time as the virtual ghost writer or that char-

latan working as Contis silly puppet Sir Isaac Newton.The reductionist rauds perpetrated under the direction

o Conti and other relevant opponents o both Keplers

and Leibnizs achievements in science on such crucial

points o the history o science, have remained the typi-

cal expression o a willul, well-dened case o a virtu-

ally satanical corruption.

Such has been the specic corruption which contin-

ues to be represented by a certain disgusting variety o

theology which was already inherently specic to an

ancient oligarchical tradition,asstill today.

Fortunately, we are presently enabled to considerthe case o the truly great scientic minds rom the

standpoint o the times o such as the original ounder

o a comprehensive notion o what has remained today

as not merely an original ather o an actually modern

science, Cardinal Nicholas o Cusa, but as, still today,

an active leading actor within the roster o scientic

thinking, like such o Cusas notable ollowers as Leon-

ardo da Vinci, and Kepler, or one o the greatest o all

modern scientists, Gottried Leibniz. The living role o

Keplers contributions to the essential oundations o

all modern science, has lost none o its luster in that re-

spect, even to the present day: as the case in hand here

and now, makes exactly that point. So, did those who

think as Cusa did in his identiying the solution or this

principle o paradox which is the nature o the character

o the universal physical principle called metaphor, as

Cusa had done this throughout the composition o his

De Docta Ignorantia.

Most notably, Cusas workremains as it is to have

been, on refection, as embodied still today, in the actual

launching o the centrally underlying principle o all

competent modern science.6 That was a development,

in which Cusa contributed several crucially unique

roles, including those to such eect that every leading

current o competence in European and trans-Atlantic

physical science, owes the shared oundation o the

modern, specically trans-Atlantic development o allcompetent modern science, to the radiating infuence o

that revolution in science, whose origin had been cen-

tered in the oundations supplied by an hereditary qual-

ity o infuence embodied in Cusas work, as in also the

ulsome pre-shaping o the rudiments o every notable

competence which endures as uniquely specic to

modern science still today.

The Deense o Science, Still TodayThe oregoing, stated considerations, lead us, prop-

erly, toward the most proound among all o the rela-tively better known, historically rooted issues o physi-

cal science, as I emphasize in the ollowing outlines.

There was nothing accidental in the stunningly ex-

ceptional, revolutionary character o Nicholas o Cusas

6. Helga Zepp, then soon to be known as Helga Zepp-LaRouche, had

played a unique role as a pioneering European journalist visiting China

during an interval o some months within that special time-period o

The Great Leap Forward; but, soon ater her return rom China, she

had then chosen to enter a scientic program back in Germany. Not long

thereater, she was in the process o upgrading her commitment to a

career into scientic studies. She had participated in a conerence o theCusanus Gesellschat, under its celebrated leader o that time, Father

Rudol Haubst, when she had reported her participation and impres-

sions to me directly. I was inspired by the report, and encouraged her to

consider steering her career in accord with Proessor Haubsts associa-

tion. Soon, there those who were to become our riends among the

clergy in the circles o the Vatican. It was a decision, coupled with her

interaction with my initiative launched during the late 1977 start o my

original launching o what became the Strategic Deense Initiative

(SDI), which had then catalyzed the destiny o both o us up through the

present time these words have been written.

Venices Abb Antonio Conti was a virtual ghost writer orSir Isaac Newton. Shown is a sketch o Conti by Pier LeoneGhezzi (1674-1755).


21/58


revolution in science and statecrat, as this is typied by

his De Docta Ignorantia. Throughout the histories o

the Mediterranean and the trans-Atlantic regions, there

have been, principally, two mutually irreconcilable

conceptions o man and our universe, conceptions

sometimes reerenced, on the one side, as God the Cre-

ator, and, the other, the Satan who, like his other nomi-

nal incarnation, the Olympian Zeus, has served inknown history as the image o the archetypical, pro-

Satanic mode o oligarch.

What the student or others have met as a medley o

science, legend, religious traditions, mysticism, out-

right lies, and the like, have shown one clearly consis-

tent quality over the course o time: they are ootprints

let by history, which include the history o lies. The

clue to understanding such medleys as that, is the saving

act that the history o lies, i and when the lies in and

concerning history are considered, is part o the evi-

dence which a real history o mankind and mankindsexperiences must consider, i an understanding o real

history is to be adduced.

For example: take the case o the Olympian Zeus, as

described. He is a ction created by evil. It is the evil

which is the alse reality o that account o history,

when the myths o the oligarchs are recognized as the

diary o evil written as an apology or its own existence

as an evil existence.

Similarly, the history o the reign o that British

puppet now known as U.S. President Obama, is the his-

tory o an evil done to our United States under the infu-ence o an oligarchical system known as the British

orm o attempted reincarnation o the Roman empire

Documents

The Mystery of Your Time