Upload
skah
View
31
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
The National Landscape of Educator Preparation Program Evaluation. APPALACHIAN COLEGE ASSOCIATION Annual Meeting of the Presidents and Chief Academic Officers June 14, 2011. Pressures on TEACHER EDUCATION. What is Prompting These Evaluation Efforts?. Real and Persistent Education Challenges - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
THE NATIONAL LANDSCAPE OF EDUCATOR PREPARATION PROGRAM EVALUATION
APPALACHIAN COLEGE ASSOCIATION
Annual Meeting of the Presidents and Chief Academic Officers
June 14, 2011
PRESSURES ON TEACHER EDUCATION
WHAT IS PROMPTING THESE EVALUATION EFFORTS?
Real and Persistent Education Challenges
The economy
Focus on Accountability
WHY ARE TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAMS UNDER FIRE?
CURRENT ACCOUNTABILITY AND DATA COLLECTION
WHY IS TEACHER EDUCATION VULNERABLE?
WHY ARE WE VULNERABLE?
Black Box
Black Hole
Perceived Lack of a Profession
Unwillingness to Deal with Weak Programs
No Easy Way to Measure Program Quality
EXAMPLES OF EVALUATION EFFORTS
Presidential Teaching Fellows ProposalState Examples
LA FL TN OH
Statewide Data SystemsUSNWR/NCTQ Project
USNWR/NCTQ PROJECT
10
“As education schools continue to be in the la-la land of good intentions and child-centered progressivist thinking, outside pressure continues to mount. And NCTQ is proud to be out there leading the charge. In about a month, NCTQ is releasing a study of Illinois’ teacher preparation programs, and next year we’re partnering with US News and World Report to publish ratings of all of the nation’s education schools. Stay tuned for more.”
Kate WalshNational Center for Teacher
QualityTeacher Quality BulletinSeptember 30, 2010
PAST NCTQ PROJECTS
National Studies Elementary Mathematics Preparation Elementary Reading Preparation
State Studies IL, UT, NM, TX, CO, IN, WY
Upcoming Studies Student Teaching (Elementary Preparation)
HIGHLIGHTS OF NATIONAL PROJECT
Rating every SCDE (not included in the study are non-IHE based programs)
Primary Methodology – Review of syllabi, handbooks, other paper documents
Looking at 17 standards developed by NCTQ’s technical advisory board
Project completion expected in mid-2012
RESPONSES Non-participation by states: WI, GA, NY, KY,
MD
California formally questioned but didn’t decline
States are cooperating: NC, TN
States objected, but decision is with the institution: FL, HI, IL,CO, OH, RI, TX, UT, VA
AACTE surveyed its membership regarding participation in the project
CONCERNS (CADREI)
Non-participants should not be included
Shadow standards
Resources and Effort
Transparency Methodology Issues Who participates
Privates Non-higher education teacher education programs
HOW SHOULD WE RESPOND?
PRESSURES ON TEACHER EDUCATION
Or…………..
We can engage our critics
Show the data
Solve the problems
STATE OF STATEWIDE DATA SYSTEMS
Seen as the “answer” to the data issues
What is their current capacity?
Questions for Institutions
Are your educator preparation programs meeting the needs of:
Your students? How do you know?Your community? How do you know?Who are your partners?What is your unique contribution to the partnership?
19
QUESTIONS TO CONSIDER
What accountability/evaluation efforts are in place in your programs?
How are institutions of higher education engaged in or responding to national and state efforts?
Do you have evidenced-based data that allows you to talk about the quality of your teacher education program?