21
The New Reactor Program Process, Progress, and Plans (And a Peek Over the Horizon) December 2, 2009 David B. Matthews, Director Division of New Reactor Licensing Office of New Reactors

The New Reactor Program Process, Progress, and Plans (And a Peek Over the Horizon)

  • Upload
    lis

  • View
    42

  • Download
    4

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The New Reactor Program Process, Progress, and Plans (And a Peek Over the Horizon). December 2, 2009 David B. Matthews, Director Division of New Reactor Licensing Office of New Reactors. Part 52 - Fitting the Pieces Together. Pre-Construction. Early Site Permit. Construction Verification. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: The New Reactor Program Process, Progress, and Plans (And a Peek Over the Horizon)

The New Reactor ProgramProcess, Progress, and Plans(And a Peek Over the Horizon)

December 2, 2009

David B. Matthews, Director Division of New Reactor Licensing

Office of New Reactors

Page 2: The New Reactor Program Process, Progress, and Plans (And a Peek Over the Horizon)

2

Part 52 - Fitting the Pieces Together

• Licensing decisions finalized before major construction begins• Inspections w/ITAAC to verify construction• Limited work may be authorized before COL issuance

Pre-ConstructionConstruction Verification

Early Site Permit

Standard Design Certification

Combined License Review, Hearing,

and Decision

Verification of Regulations

with ITAAC

ReactorOperationDecision

OptionalPre-Application

Review

Page 3: The New Reactor Program Process, Progress, and Plans (And a Peek Over the Horizon)

3

New Reactor Applications Under Review [Aug 2008]

• 11 Combined License Applications– Calvert Cliffs, South Texas, Bellefonte, North Anna, Lee, Harris,

Grand Gulf, Vogtle, Summer, Callaway, and Levy County

• 3 Design Certification (DC) Applications– General Electric Economic and Simplified Boiling Water Reactor

(ESBWR)– AREVA Evolutionary Power Reactor (EPR)– Mitsubishi U.S. Advanced Pressurized Water Reactor (US APWR)

• 1 Amended DC Application– Westinghouse AP1000 Certification Amendment

• 1 Early Site Permit/Limited Work Authorization– Vogtle

Page 4: The New Reactor Program Process, Progress, and Plans (And a Peek Over the Horizon)

44

New Reactor Applications [November 2009]

• 18 Combined License Applications

• 3 Design Certification (DC) Applications– General Electric Economic and Simplified

Boiling Water Reactor (ESBWR)– AREVA Evolutionary Power Reactor (EPR)– Mitsubishi U.S. Advanced Pressurized

Water Reactor (US APWR)

• 2 Amended DC Applications– Westinghouse AP1000 Certification

Amendment– ABWR Aircraft Impact Amendment (STP)

Page 5: The New Reactor Program Process, Progress, and Plans (And a Peek Over the Horizon)
Page 6: The New Reactor Program Process, Progress, and Plans (And a Peek Over the Horizon)
Page 7: The New Reactor Program Process, Progress, and Plans (And a Peek Over the Horizon)

7

Rulemaking

DC Review

COL -3

COL -4

One Issue,One Review,One Position

COL -2Mandatory

Hearing

COL -1 Reference

MandatoryHearing

MandatoryHearing

MandatoryHearing

Page 8: The New Reactor Program Process, Progress, and Plans (And a Peek Over the Horizon)

8

Potential DC Activity

• DC Renewal—2 for ABWR (2010)

• New DC (potentially 2012)

Page 9: The New Reactor Program Process, Progress, and Plans (And a Peek Over the Horizon)

9

Potential ESP Activity

• Victoria County (2010)

• PSEG (2010)

• Unnamed (2012)

• Unnamed (2013)

• S.O.C.E.P.A. (????)

Page 10: The New Reactor Program Process, Progress, and Plans (And a Peek Over the Horizon)

10

Potential COLA Activity

• Restart Nine Mile Point (2010)

• Blue Castle (2010)

• Unnamed COL (2010-2011)

• Unnamed COL (2011-2012)

• Southern COL (2012)

• Unnamed COL (????)

Page 11: The New Reactor Program Process, Progress, and Plans (And a Peek Over the Horizon)

11

Deferred/Cancelled COLAs

• River Bend (deferred)

• Grand Gulf (deferred)

• Callaway (cancelled)

• Victoria County (converted to ESP)

Page 12: The New Reactor Program Process, Progress, and Plans (And a Peek Over the Horizon)

12

Review Group Labels

• Focus Projects

• Sequenced Projects

• Suspended Projects

• Potential Projects

• Advanced Reactor Projects

Page 13: The New Reactor Program Process, Progress, and Plans (And a Peek Over the Horizon)

13

Looking Back…

• Challenges:– Infrastructure – Policies and procedures

• Successes:– Part 52 rulemaking– Limited Work Authorization rulemaking– Updated hearing policy– Interim staff guidance process– Designed Centered Approach

Page 14: The New Reactor Program Process, Progress, and Plans (And a Peek Over the Horizon)

Contested Hearings• Calvert Cliffs: 2 Contentions Admitted• Bellefonte: 2• North Anna (COL): 1 (pending)• Vogtle (COL): 1 (+2 pending)• Summer/Harris/Lee: none• South Texas: 5 (+2 pending)• Levy County: 3• Comanche Peak: 2 (+1 pending)• Bell Bend: none• Fermi: 4 (+1 pending)

14

Page 15: The New Reactor Program Process, Progress, and Plans (And a Peek Over the Horizon)

15

Lessons Learned

• Simultaneous review of many applications

• Incomplete applications challenge staff’s ability in making safety findings

• Applicants revising submission dates which challenge planning and availability of resources

• Staff and applicants have benefitted from pre-application interactions

• Staff is noticing trend in that COL applications are improving with respect to high quality submittals

Page 16: The New Reactor Program Process, Progress, and Plans (And a Peek Over the Horizon)

16

Looking Forward…

• Challenges:– Transition from initial licensing to construction

and beyond– Sequencing of reviews– Possible change in the rulemaking process– Review of design certification renewals– ITAAC verification and closure

Page 17: The New Reactor Program Process, Progress, and Plans (And a Peek Over the Horizon)

17

New Construction

• Nuclear plants will be built more rapidly than their predecessors

• Detailed engineering essentially complete by start of construction

• Modular construction techniques will be used• Fabrication of components may begin before

COL issuance• Components and modules will be fabricated in

other countries• Site preparation work will likely be performed

Page 18: The New Reactor Program Process, Progress, and Plans (And a Peek Over the Horizon)

Post-COL ChallengesOperator licensing

Vendor/module inspection

CIP implementation

Construction Assessment Process

ITAAC/DAC inspection

ITAAC closure process

License amendments

18

Page 19: The New Reactor Program Process, Progress, and Plans (And a Peek Over the Horizon)

19

Concluding Reminders

Project status and schedules can be tracked at www.nrc.gov by clicking on “Nuclear Reactors” and then “New Reactors.”

HELP US HELP YOU

Page 20: The New Reactor Program Process, Progress, and Plans (And a Peek Over the Horizon)

20

Key Terms in Part 52

(a) Early site permit means a Commission approval, issued under subpart A of this

part, for a site or sites for one or more nuclear power facilities.

(b) Standard design certification or design certification means a Commission

approval, issued under subpart B of this part, of a final standard design for a

nuclear power facility. A design so approved may be referred to as a certified

standard design.

(c) Combined license means a combined construction permit and operating license

with conditions for a nuclear power facility issued under subpart C of this part.

Page 21: The New Reactor Program Process, Progress, and Plans (And a Peek Over the Horizon)

21

Key Terms in Part 52 (cont.)

(e) Standard design approval or design approval means an NRC staff approval, issued

under subpart E of this part, of a final standard design for an entire nuclear power

facility or a major portion thereof.

(f) Manufacturing license means a license, issued under subpart F of this part,

authorizing the manufacture of nuclear power reactors but not their construction,

installation, or operation at the sites on which the reactors are to be operated.

ITAAC – the inspections, tests, and analyses that the licensee shall perform, and the

acceptance criteria that, if met, are necessary and sufficient to provide reasonable

assurance that the facility has been constructed and will be operated in conformity

with the license, the provisions of the Act, and the Commission’s regulations.