Upload
university-of-minnesota
View
650
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
Department Chair Leadership Program
November 19, 2009
The Organization of Development
university development
Mission
To engage the resources of the private sector to build and
sustain excellence at the University of Minnesota.
why we were formed
The University of Minnesota Foundation was formed to accept and manage gifts on behalf of the University and its colleges, campuses and programs.
Specifically, it:• Exists to support the University’s interests. • Secures, manages and invests private support for
the benefit of the University.• Provides private support for a portion of the
operations or programs of the University.• Uses sound fiscal and auditing procedures. • Obtains and maintains status as a tax exempt
organization.
fundraising at the U of M
UMF relationship with the University includes development oversight and services―Strategic U-wide development leadership:• Focused principal gift development.• Delivery of comprehensive development
services for U-wide Development (i.e. technology, legal, donor relations, gift administration, annual giving, communications).
• Financial subsidies to collegiate development programs.
• Endowment investment management.• Assessments across colleges/programs for
continued program support or new investment.
HISTORICALCOMPARISON
College of Biological Sciences$531,914 Carlson School of Management
$9,788,639
College of Continuing Education$131,848
TOTAL: $267 million
School of Dentistry$1,610,411
College of Food, Agricultural, and
Natural Resource Sciences$10,305,232College of Design$921,554
College of Education and Human Development
$2,618,332 Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs
$583,255
Law School$8,007,077
College of Liberal Arts$7,315,464
Medical School$71,299,503
School of Nursing$4,369,773 College of Pharmacy
$1,052,327School of Public Health
$781,206 Institute of Technology$15,018,521
College of Veterinary Medicine $5,688,709
U of M Crookston$531,594
U of M Duluth$10,256,947
U of M Morris$1,853,707
U of M Rochester$61,017
4-H$363,043
Bell Museum of Natural History
$664,305
Masonic Cancer Center$1,983,671
Center for Spirituality and Healing$250,512
Weisman Art Museum$797,517
Intercollegiate Athletics$24,327,576
Minnesota Landscape Arboretum$3,833,393
U of M Libraries$904,856
U of M Amplatz Children’s Hospital$50,000,000
48,052 alumni30,184 other individuals
4,920 organizations
Cash giftsBequestsFuture commitments
PURPOSE OF GIFTS$267 million total
ACADEMIC PROGRAMS $72 MILLION
27%
PURPOSE OF GIFTS$267 million total
STUDENTS $35 MILLION 13%
PURPOSE OF GIFTS$267 million total
FACILITIES $70 MILLION 26%
PURPOSE OF GIFTS$267 million total
RESEARCH $60 MILLION 22%
PURPOSE OF GIFTS$267 million total
FACULTY $20 MILLION 8%
PURPOSE OF GIFTS$267 million total
STRATEGIC INITIATIVES $10 MILLION
4%
$154 $162$194
$228 $233 $239 $246$265 $267
$314 $308
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
$ M
illion
s
measures of successGrowth in Voluntary Support
National ranking among:Public & private universities 18 18 21 16 14 15 14 14 14 1617 Public universities only 6 6 9 6 4 7 5 5 4 5 6
(Source: Giving USA 2009)
(In Millions)
measures of successVoluntary Support of Education 2008: Private and Public
1. Stanford
$7852. Harvard
6513. Columbia
4954. Yale
4875. Pennsylvania
4766. UCLA
4577. Johns Hopkins
4498. Wisconsin
4109. Cornell
40910.Southern California
409
11.Indiana
$40912.New York
38813.Duke
38614.UC – San Francisco
36615.Michigan
33316.MIT
31217.Minnesota
30818.Washington
30319.UNC – Chapel Hill
29220.UC – Berkeley
285
(In Millions)
(Source: Voluntary Support of Education (VSE) Survey aka CAE, CFAE, 6/30/2009)
$785 $887 $989 $1,155$1,385 $1,359
$553$654
$772$876
$1,172 $1,155
$177$187
$204
$224
$262 $249
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Minnesota MedicalFoundation
University ofMinnesota
University ofMinnesota Foundation
Combined University Endowments (in millions)As of June 30
National ranking among:Public & private universities 25 25 25 25 24 17Public universities only 6 6 6 6 6 6
$2,819
$1,728$1,965
$2,255
$1,515
$2,763
measures of success
(Source: Voluntary Support of Education (VSE) Survey aka CAE, CFAE, 6/30/2009)
transformational giving
Largest recent gifts from individuals
• 31 of 60 largest gifts were for higher education, totaling $3.7 billion.
• Uses of these gifts: 10 to medical schools or health initiatives;
7 to institution-wide initiatives; 7 to business schools.
• 7 of the 31 had building components.
• Endowment gifts were most popular.
National Trends
transformational giving
Largest individual donors• 20 of 31 higher education gifts were from alumni.
• 90% of donors had been engaged as volunteers over a long time period.
• Cash gifts were rare. Most were a combination of cash and future gifts.
Trends
giving trends
Motivations for giving
• To leave a legacy.• To support things they care about.• To support a passion for a cause or vision.• To give back in gratitude for what his/her
University did for them.
critical success factors
A Compelling Case
• Aligns U’s vision, strengths, priorities with donors’ dreams, passions & goals.
critical success factors
A Top-Quality Development Operation
• Ability to attract, retain top professional talent.
• Effective coordination in decentralized culture.
• Strong central services.• Budget appropriate for the potential.
–Cost to raise $1 at the U of M has averaged only 9.4 cents annually for past decade.–ROI: $7-$15 raised for each $1
invested in development
relationship with college/unit
Collegiate Development Colleagues
• New employee orientation.• Monthly development meetings.• Training opportunities.• Donor consultation.• Central development services.• Rewards and recognition.
Chancellors/Deans/Directors
• Search process consultation (descriptions, search committee resources, networking).
• Financial subsidy.• Compensation consultation and
market analysis.• Performance management
consultation.• Development strategy consultation.
UMF Strategic Partnerships
DEVELOPMENT
FINANCIALMANAGEMENT
MARKETING/ COMMUNICATIONS
DATABASE MANAGEMENT
• TRANSFORMATIONAL GIVING
Define opportunities.
Identify and match key prospects.
Lead and implement strategies.
Develop high-quality proposals.
Facilitate collaboration.
DEVELOPMENT
FINANCIALMANAGEMENT
MARKETING/ COMMUNICATIONS
DATABASE MANAGEMENT
• TRANSFORMATIONAL GIVING
• COLLEGE/CAMPUS PROGRAMMING
Establish U-wide development strategy.
Provide sophisticated value-added services.
Facilitate successful development activities.
DEVELOPMENT
FINANCIALMANAGEMENT
MARKETING/ COMMUNICATIONS
DATABASE MANAGEMENT
• TRANSFORMATIONAL GIVING
• COLLEGE/CAMPUS PROGRAMMING
• CRITICAL SERVICES & INITIATIVES
Support assessment fundraising priorities and activities.
Coordinate Promise of Tomorrow scholarship efforts and match programs.
Develop ongoing sustained giving opportunities.
DEVELOPMENT
FINANCIALMANAGEMENT
MARKETING/ COMMUNICATIONS
DATABASE MANAGEMENT
• ENSURE SUPERIOR FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT & ADMINISTRATION
Ensure gifts are utilized effectively.
Manage financial reporting and gift counting.
Manage over 5,500 individual funds.
Ensure clean audits; manage internal controls; and, IRS compliance.
DEVELOPMENT
FINANCIALMANAGEMENT
MARKETING/ COMMUNICATIONS
DATABASE MANAGEMENT
• Provide communications support to develop stories and messages about the importance of private gifts.
• Hold events that create shared experiences for our donors as we engage them in the life of the University.
• Prioritize U-wide donor recognition and stewarding programs.
• Enhance Annual Giving strategies to broaden the base of support.
DEVELOPMENT
FINANCIALMANAGEMENT
MARKETING/ COMMUNICATIONS
DATABASE MANAGEMENT
• Support critical UMF applications.
• Design and build new applications.
• Fulfill ad-hoc requests for data (3,000+ annually).
• Support UMF office network.
• Perform DMS training; administer security.
DEVELOPMENT
FINANCIALMANAGEMENT
MARKETING/ COMMUNICATIONS
DATABASE MANAGEMENT
relationship with college/unit
How you can help by:
• Going on calls with CDOs and DOs, as appropriate.
• Identifying alumni and prospects with potential to support your area.
• Working with CDOs and DOs for appropriate prospect coordination.
Questions?