Upload
paige-timson
View
219
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Party’s Over: Regime Breakdown & the Durability of Fragmented Political Systems in the Middle East
Payam Mohseni, Ph.D.
Harvard University
Arab Uprisings 2011: Cases of Regime Breakdown or Survival Crisis
Tunisia
Egypt
Yemen
Syria
Resilient Cases: Algeria, Morocco, Kuwait, Jordan, Lebanon, Iraq…
Theories of Authoritarian Durability:The Political Party
elite cooptation, power-sharing, and patronage
elite conflict resolution and the strengthening of elite cohesion
elongation of institutional time horizons for party members due to rules of appointment and succession
These mechanisms hold true even under periods of economic crisis and popular opposition
Parties enhance organizational power and mobilizational capacity of the state itself—and, hence, the regime’s ability to repress
Samuel Huntington, Political Order in Changing Societies, 1968
Mechanisms
Jason Brownlee, Authoritarianism in the Age of Democracy, 2007
Egypt Durable Regime
Stable political party
Iran Fragile Regime
Factionalism
Iran 2009: Green Movement
The puzzle of regime survival given these theories
Theoretical Argument
The new media has altered survival dynamics of political regimes
The impact of the complex and fragmented structure of fragmented party regimes:
1. Difficult to create unified coalition because of an absence of a single center of gravity
2. More adaptive to integrate and divide opposition
Note: Not an overarching explanation but an emphasis on an overlooked variable (e.g. monarchy, oil, repression…)
The New Media
Cell phones, satellite TV, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter…
Easier to instigate public reaction and outrage
Easier to mobilize opposition
According to Marc Lynch, the new media has:
1. Increased state’s cost of repression
2. Challenged state’s monopoly of public sphere
3. Attracted international attention to the movements and states
New and more advanced regime threat
“
”
If over a period of time an organization has developed a set of responses for effectively dealing with one type of problem, and if it is then confronted with an entirely different type of problem requiring a different response, the organization may well be a victim of its past successes and be unable to adjust to the new challenges.
Huntington, 1968
Institutionalization vs. Adaptation
(party structure & hierarchy)
Figure 1. Power Structures in Hegemonic and Fragmented Party Regimes
This figure is based on the “Structures of Contestation” Figure in Ellen Lust-Okar, Structuring Conflict in the Arab World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005: 39.
Complexity & Adaptation
The importance of elections – fluctuation of power
Complex institutional and power relations: multiple pillars
Adaptation: absorb shock and crisis
Theories of ‘elite splits’ or ‘opening’ inapplicable
Transitions Paradigm
Blurring of Incumbent-Opposition distinction
Unintended consequence of institutional design
Divergence in historical origins
Figure 2. Oppositional Mobilization in Hegemonic and Fragmented Party Regimes
This figure is based on the “Structures of Contestation” Figure in Ellen Lust-Okar, Structuring Conflict in the Arab World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005: 39.
Implications
The expansion and improvement in media capabilities and social technological platforms—and hence individual empowerment—will only increase with time. (U.S. National Intelligence Council 2012)
Hegemonic political parties will be more ill-equipped to channel diverse societal forces within the single institution of the party
Future of nondemocratic regime architecture will lie outside of party structures and in different forms of fragmented arrangements. This will not necessarily mean an increase in democratic regimes.
Greater fragmentation of power, increased number of parallel ruling and opposition parties, fluidity
2013 U.S. GOVERNMENT
SHUTDOWN
SHUTDOWNS
Congress has “power of the purse”
12 US government shutdowns since 1980 1995-1996: 21 days 2013: 16 days (October 1 – 16, 2013)
Presidentialism/Parliamentarism
Checks-and-balances (House of Representatives, Senate, President)
2013
800,000 employees furloughed, 1.3 million went to work without known payment dates
2010 Obamacare (Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act) & Debt-Ceiling
Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2014 Voted by House on September 20, 2013 Senate passed revised version on September 27, 2013 House reinstated removed measures and passed bill on September 29, 2013
2010 Elections Republican control of the House (Tea Party Movement strengthened) Democratic control of the Senate
TEA PARTY MOVEMENT 2009
Libertarianism and fiscal conservatism?
Theda Skocpol, Harvard University:
Fear of what America is becoming; racial politics & anti-immigration; opposition to Democrats, and pro-funding cuts for the youth
1. Powerful right-wing media with access to older, white males
2. Funders; Think-Tanks (Heritage Foundation)
3. Republican activists
Decentralized hierarchy; no one center; pincer strategy on Rep. Party
Sen. Ted Cruz, Texas
Republican Party apparatus has lost power to enforce discipline
CONCLUSIONS According to Skocpol:
1. Tea Party is strong and here to stay. At least 3 consecutive election defeats necessary
2. “Moderate Republicans” do not exist anymore. Two-thirds of House Republicans against bipartisan efforts to re-open federal government. Also, more than half of GOP voters sympathize with Tea Party
3. Sen. Ted Cruz may be well positioned to garner unified support of Tea Partiers for 2016 GOP presidential primaries
4. The ending of the shutdown was not necessarily a win for Democrats. Tea Party has impeded effective governance and raised costs
CONCLUSIONS On October 16, the Senate passed the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2014, a continuing resolution, to fund the government until January 15, 2014, and suspending the debt ceiling until February 7, 2014, thus ending both the United States federal government shutdown of 2013 and the United States debt-ceiling crisis of 2013.
Despite Republican efforts to strip the Affordable Care Act of funding or delay the law as part of a deal to reopen the government, the Senate plan's only concession to the Republican leadership on the issue was stricter income verification rules for citizens accessing the health insurance exchanges.
NBC polls showed that Americans blamed the Republicans more for the shutdown than President Barack Obama by a margin of 22 points (53 percent to 31 percent).
According to a Gallup Poll, "60 percent of respondents said that a third major party is needed to represent the American people", an all-time high.
US-IRAN NUCLEAR NEGOTIATIONSAnd the Future of the Middle East
ISSUES
NPT and nuclear proliferation
Future of Iran in the Middle East
Sanctions