19
The Plural Is Sematically Unmarked Alex de Vries Enis Kahrimanovic

The Plural Is Sematically Unmarked Alex de Vries Enis Kahrimanovic

  • View
    219

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Plural Is Sematically Unmarked Alex de Vries Enis Kahrimanovic

The Plural Is Sematically Unmarked

Alex de VriesEnis Kahrimanovic

Page 2: The Plural Is Sematically Unmarked Alex de Vries Enis Kahrimanovic

Singular vs. Plural

• Plurality just means ‘more than one’

Page 3: The Plural Is Sematically Unmarked Alex de Vries Enis Kahrimanovic

Plural?Plural does not always imply cardinality greater than one(1) a. You're welcome to bring your children.

b. You're welcome to bring your two or more children.(2) a. Every boy should invite his sisters. b. Every boy should invite his two or more sisters(3) a. No chairs are available. b. Two or more chairs aren't available.(4) a. Könnten Sie bitte etwas rücken Could pro.3PL please a little move

`Could you please move over.' b. Könnten Sie zwei bitte etwas rücken. Could pro.3PL two please a little move `Could you two please move over.'

Page 4: The Plural Is Sematically Unmarked Alex de Vries Enis Kahrimanovic

Strong theory vs. Weak theory• Strong theory of the plural

[Sing](x) is defined if #x=1[Sing](x) x = wherever it is defined[Plur](x) is defined only if #x > 1[Plur](x) wherever it is defined

• Weak theory of the plural[Sing](x) is defined if #x=1[Sing](x) x = wherever it is defined[Plur](x) is always defined[Plur](x) = x wherever it is defined(Use plural only if singular is blocked)

Page 5: The Plural Is Sematically Unmarked Alex de Vries Enis Kahrimanovic

Weak theory of the plural

(a) The boy, Kay, smiles(b) The boys, Kay and Hannes, smile.

Page 6: The Plural Is Sematically Unmarked Alex de Vries Enis Kahrimanovic

Mixed reference

• You are welcome to bring your childrenYou are welcome to bring your childYou are welcome to bring your child or children

• You may bring your children if you have anyYou may bring your children if you have more than one

• Every boy should invite his sisters to the partyEvery boy should invite his sister to the party

Page 7: The Plural Is Sematically Unmarked Alex de Vries Enis Kahrimanovic

Plural pronouns with singular reference

• Könten sie bitte etwas rückencould pro.3pl please a little move sideways“Could you please move a little?”

• Könntest du bitte etwas rückencould pro.2sg please a little move sideways

(very common in languages)

Page 8: The Plural Is Sematically Unmarked Alex de Vries Enis Kahrimanovic

Old English vs. New English

• Thou speak’st in better phrase and matter then thou didst.

• Methinks you’re better spoken

Modern English lost singluar/plural distinction in 2nd person pronouns.

• Someone left their umbrella.

Page 9: The Plural Is Sematically Unmarked Alex de Vries Enis Kahrimanovic

Brown and Levinson (1987)

• Frau Meier, ihre Nasen müssen operiert werden.Ms. Meier, pro.3pl nose-PL must-PL operated be“Ms. Meier, you must receive surgery on your noses”

Page 10: The Plural Is Sematically Unmarked Alex de Vries Enis Kahrimanovic

Indefinites in downward entailing contexts

• Without artificial ingredients• If John had eaten any apples from the basket,

there would be at least one/two less in the basket.

Page 11: The Plural Is Sematically Unmarked Alex de Vries Enis Kahrimanovic

Child performance

• Difference with adults:– Children acquire implicatures quite late (age 5)

Hypothese: Children at age 5 do not understand plural marking like an adult.

Page 12: The Plural Is Sematically Unmarked Alex de Vries Enis Kahrimanovic

Experiment

• 5 test items: • Does a girl have noses?

• 8 contole items: • Does a fish have legs?

• Results– Test items:

– 4% adult-like

– Controle items– 97% adult-like

Page 13: The Plural Is Sematically Unmarked Alex de Vries Enis Kahrimanovic

Explanation

• H1: Children do not percieve plural morphology

• H2: Children treat some questions in the same way as adults treat downward entailing enviroments

• Does a dog have tails?• Does a office have windows?

Page 14: The Plural Is Sematically Unmarked Alex de Vries Enis Kahrimanovic

Adult performance

• Four questions:• Does a dog have tails?• Does a dog have two tails?• Does a goat have horns?• Does a goat have two horns?

Page 15: The Plural Is Sematically Unmarked Alex de Vries Enis Kahrimanovic

Adult performance

• Four questions:• Does a dog have tails?• Does a dog have two tails?• Does a goat have horns?• Does a goat have two horns?

Page 16: The Plural Is Sematically Unmarked Alex de Vries Enis Kahrimanovic

Explanation

• Sentences with a negative answer:• Conflict between singular and plural

(different truth values) Additional reading/processing time

• Sentences with a positive answer:• No conflict between singular and plural

(samo truth values) No additional reading/processing time

Page 17: The Plural Is Sematically Unmarked Alex de Vries Enis Kahrimanovic

Conclusion

• Plural is ‘more than one’, but not always

• Strong vs weak• Mixed reference• Singel reference

• Child performance

• Adult performance

Page 18: The Plural Is Sematically Unmarked Alex de Vries Enis Kahrimanovic

Discussion

Which dog has tails?

Page 19: The Plural Is Sematically Unmarked Alex de Vries Enis Kahrimanovic

Discussion

• Every boy should invite his sisters to the party

• Every boy has more than one sisters?• At least on boy has more than one sisters?