Upload
others
View
9
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
THE POLITICAL BLUESRULES OF POLITICAL ACTIVITY IN THE PUBLIC WORKPLACE
October 11, 2017
Jonathan J. Downes17 South High Street, Suite 900
Columbus, Ohio 43215
614-565-2075 [email protected]
Jonathan J. Downes
• AV Preeminent rated by Martindale Hubbell.
• Fellow in the College of Labor and Employment Lawyers.
• Ohio State Bar Association - Certified Specialist in Labor and Employment Law.
• More than thirty years of experience and expertise in representing public and private employers in labor and employment law and human resource management.
• Negotiated over 700 labor contracts and advocated in over 400 impasse hearings and arbitrations.
• Represents employers in organizing campaigns and administrative hearings.
• Defends employers in state trial and appellate courts, courts, the Ohio Supreme Court, federal district courts and the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
• Recognized many times over as a subject-matter expert, Jonathan was selected as one of the Top 50 Central Ohio Lawyers of 2015 and every year since 2004 has been named an Ohio “Super Lawyer”.
2
• Zashin & Rich Co., L.P.A. (“Z&R”) has over 30 attorneys, 20 of whomspecialize in labor and employment law with offices in Columbus andCleveland, representing both private and public employers.
• Z&R represents its clients in labor negotiations, human resourcesmatters, and civil service. Attorneys of Z&R have collectivelynegotiated over 1000 contracts and have represented private andpublic employers in arbitrations, impasse proceedings and litigation.
• Z&R represents private employers, universities and colleges, stateagencies, special districts, cities, counties, townships, housingauthorities, hospitals and others. Attorneys handle matters at theNational Labor Relations Board, the State Employment RelationsBoard, State Personnel Board of Review, and local Civil ServiceCommissions.
About Zashin and Rich
3
columbus | cleveland
Employment and Labor Law Group
• Zashin & Rich’s Employment Group has extensive experience representing public sector entities, large and small businesses, and non-profit organizations. Zashin & Rich’s Employment Group’s expertise extends into many areas including:
• Litigation and EPLI Defense
• Discrimination and Retaliation
• General Employment Counseling
• Labor Law
• Collective Bargaining
• FLSA, Wage and Hour Issues
• Worker’s Compensation
• Restrictive Covenants
• Employee Handbooks
• Unemployment Compensation
• Civil Service Law
• Public Records/Sunshine Laws
4
Discrimination and Retaliation
Laws Representation
o Title VII
o ADA
o ADEA
o FMLA
o PDA
o FLSA
o §1983
AGENDA
Political Activity and Coverage defined
Workplace and Off Duty Conduct
Freedom of Speech
Social Media and Political Speech
Union Activities
Discipline
Local Options
55
Classified Civil Service Employees
ORC 124.57 Prohibition against solicitation
No officer or employee in the classified service ….
shall directly or indirectly, orally or by letter, solicit or receive, or be in any manner concerned in soliciting or receiving, any assessment, subscription, or contribution for any political party or for any candidate for public office
66
Classified Civil Service Employees
ORC 124.57 Solicitation of employees
No officer or employee in the classified service
shall solicit directly or indirectly, orally or by letter, or be in any manner concerned in soliciting, any such assessment, contribution, or payment from any officer or employee in
the classified service…..
77
Classified Civil Service Employees
ORC 124.57 Prohibition against partisan activity
No officer or employee in the classified service…
shall be an officer in any political organization or take part in politics other than to vote as the officer or employee pleases and to express freely political opinions.
88
Penalties
Penalties OAC 123:1-46-02(D)
An employee in the classified service who engages in any of the (prohibited) activities… is subject to removal from his or her position in the classified service. The appointing authority may initiate such removal action in accordance with the procedures in section 124.34 of the Revised Code.
99
Classified Civil Service Employees
Permissible Activities See OAC 123:1-46-02(B)
Register and vote
Express opinions
Voluntarily financially contribute
Circulate non-partisan petitions
Attend political rallies
Be a candidate in nonpartisan elections
1010
Classified Civil Service Employees
Permissible activities
Sign nominating petitions
Display political materials on person, property, vehicles
Serve as a precinct election official (see ORC 3501.22)
1111
Classified Civil Service Employees
Prohibited activities OAC 123:1-46-02(C)
Candidate for partisan office
File petitions for candidacy for partisan office
Circulate petitions for partisan office
Hold office in partisan political organization
Campaign for candidates for political office: speeches, distribute political material
1212
Classified Civil Service Employees
Prohibited activities
Solicit cash or in-kind contributions
Sell political party tickets
Partisan activities at polls
Serve as a witness or challenger
Participate in partisan political caucuses or partisan political action committees
1313
Unclassified Employees
Ohio Administrative Code 123:1-46-02 (E)
Employees in the unclassified service are not
prohibited from engaging in political activity
unless specifically precluded by federal or
state constitutional or statutory provisions.
Federal Hatch Act may apply if employees
are connected to federal funding.
1414
Enforcement and Discretion
RC 124.57 may not be constitutionally enforced to prohibit classified employees from engaging in nonpartisan political activity; however, employees may be removed who engage in prohibited activity; such authority is discretionary, not mandatory.
OAG 83-095
1515
Partisan Politics
The word politics interpreted in the narrow sense of partisan regulates non-protected political activity and is a lawful enactment by the legislature.
Gray v. Toledo (N.D. Ohio) 323 F. Supp. 1281
1971.
1616
Civil Service Law Prohibition
Employee terminated who participated in a political committee which supported partisan activity.
Jackson v. Coffey 52 Ohio St.2d 43 (1977)
1717
Partisan Election
Employee ran for public office in a partisan election as an independent. It is irrelevant whether the political activity took place on or off the premises.
Wright v. Summit County Sheriff's Department No. 9750 (9th Dist. Ct. of Appeals, Summit,
(10-22-80)
1818
Unemployment Compensation
Unclassified deputy county auditor subject to reappointment is not subject to the proscription against political activity under RC 124.57 and thus discharge of a deputy auditor seeking elective political office is deemed without just cause for unemployment compensation.
In re Stevenson UCRC C2007-219-0004
(2-2-2008)
1919
Collective Bargaining Agreements
The terms of a collective bargaining agreement may provide that a classified employee may engage in partisan politics and, pursuant to RC 4117.10(A), such terms will prevail over the provisions of RC 124.57.
OAG 91-065
2020
Union Officials
Deputy, union officer, which union endorses candidates who signs prelease announcement of endorsement violated 124.57 as the activity is attempt to influence votes of others and not expression of one’s opinion.
OPBA v. Wayne County Sheriff’s Office
27 Oh App3d 175 (1986)
2121
Penalties for Participation
Classified employee (deputy sheriff) engaging in partisan politics by signing and filing with the County Board of Elections a "Declaration of Candidacy" and by obtaining and soliciting signatures on the "Petition for Candidate" was found guilty of prohibited political activity, fined $500.00 and placed on probation.
City of Sidney v. O'Leary, Case No. 00-CRB-00350 (Shelby County, Ohio 2000).
2222
Solicitation of Employees
§ 3517.092 Solicitation of contributions
(C)(1) and (2) No elected officer (or candidate) of a political subdivision of the state, no campaign committee of such an officer, no employee of such an officer’s office and no other person or entity shall knowingly solicit a contribution to an elected officer (or candidate) of a political subdivision of the state or to such an officer’s campaign committee from any of the following:
2323
Solicitation of Employees
§ 3517.092 Prohibition of Solicitation of political contributions of…
(a) An employee of that political subdivision whose appointing authority is that elected officer;
(b) An employee of that political subdivision whose appointing authority is authorized or required by law to be appointed by that elected officer;
(c) An employee of that political subdivision who functions in or is employed in or by the same public agency, department, division, or office as that elected officer.
2424
Applicable Rules and Policies
Establish Rules and Policies:
Standard of Conduct
Equipment and Computers
Political Activities
On and Off Duty Conduct
Morale and Image (law enforcement)
Reputation of Department
2525
Employer Equipment Use Policy
Improper use of employer equipment: including telephones, e-mail, the internal mail system, computers, fax machines, electronic equipment may only be used to the benefit of the employer, and cannot be used for "personal use."
Policy provides that employees may not use the employer's equipment for personal use, and Employer has right to examine any equipment and discipline against improper use.
2626
Employee Conduct on Social Media
Can Employers discipline employees foroff-duty social media comments, posts, etc. on non-employers social media sites?
What standards apply for employee off-duty conduct?
How “freely” may employees “speak”?
27
Protected Conduct on Social Media
First Amendment - Speech by employees outside the workplace
Social media activity is “speech” that can be protected by the First Amendment.
Highly fact specific- Considers content and the audience for the post i.e., whether it was public, or only shared with limited groups of “friends”.
Sweeping bans on discussing employer business on social media might be viewed as an unlawful prior restraint.
Risk of Section 1983 liability merely for implementing the policy.
28
First Amendment Considerations
• Social media speech examined the same as other forms of speech.
• Speech is a matter of “public concern” when it enables the public to make informed decisions about government operations or raises or identifies issues of interest to the public.
• Public Concern may outweigh governmental interests.• Examples: Unsafe conditions, policy decisions,
unlawful conduct, failure to follow law, funding decisions.
• Whether employee is speaking as a spokesperson for an organization e.g. union.
29
First Amendment Considerations
• Speech is not protected when the efficiencies in public service outweighs the public concern, e.g. morale, efficiency of operations.
• If speech was an internal matter, employee’s job (Garcetti).
• Whether internal reporting system exists such as discrimination policies.
• Examples: Claims of harassment; negative, derogatory or inflammatory comments about coworker.
• Confidential information may not be disclosed.• If speech was a matter of personal concern.• If speech suggests or promotes illegal
conduct/activity.
30
1st Amendment Balancing Test
Balancing Test for Freedom of Speech:
• Did speech involve a matter of public concern?
• Did speaking interest outweigh government interest in efficient public service?
• Speech played substantial part in employment decision.
• Then, if first 3, would government have made same decision absent protected speech.
31
1st Amendment Balancing Test
Balancing Test for Freedom of Speech:
• Maintaining discipline and good working relations is a legitimate government interest.
• Actual disruption in the workplace not required.
• Issues of public concern not raised.
• Not a violation of freedom of speech.
32
Bland v. Roberts U.S. Appeals Ct.
Facts:
• Sheriff’s Office employees (unprotected).
• Not reappointed following reelection of Sheriff.
• Employees “liked” Facebook page of opponent candidate.
• One employee wrote on campaign page and employee photo added to page of candidate.
33
Bland v. Roberts
Holdings:
• Show of support was the “Internet equivalent” of a political yard sign.
• Conduct constitutes “speech.”
• The “like” is a substantive statement warranting 1st Amendment considerations.
• Governmental interest does not outweigh 1st
Amendment protections.
• Officers’ 1st Amendment Rights violated.
34
OCSEA - Ohio Dept. Rehab and Correction
Arbitration under collective bargaining agreement
Facts:
• Corrections Officer posting on Facebook following death of Bin Laden “ok, we got Bin Laden . . . Let’s go get Kasich next . . . who’s with me?”
• Seventeen people “liked” the post, 4 employees of DRC.
• Posting open to public.
• Corrections Officer terminated.
35
OCSEA - Ohio Dept. Rehab and Correction
Holding:
• Arbitrator noted conduct only “empty words”.
• Arbitrator noted threat not potentially dangerous to Governor.
• Off-duty conduct subject to discipline.
• Sufficient cause for discharge not present.
• 14 month suspension, reinstatement.
36
Discipline Process
Civil Service
Collective Bargaining Agreement
Predisciplinary Procedures
Appeals and Arbitrations
Lawsuits
3737
Zashin & Rich Newsletter
Newsletter Signup
Stay up to date on the latest Z&R news, Employment Law Quarterly newsletters, and
Employment Law Alerts.
http://zrlaw.com/newsletters.html
38
THANK YOU!
Questions - please contact:
Jonathan J. Downes
Zashin & Rich
17 South High Street, Suite 900
Columbus, Ohio 43215
(614) 565-2075
(614) 224-4411
Copyright 201739