Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SPECIALIST BOTANICAL REPORT
THE PROPOSED KHETSHE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT WITHIN NEWCASTLE LOCAL
MUNICIPALITY, AMAJUBA DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY, KWAZULU-NATAL
October 2016
Prepared by:
Afzelia Environmental Consultants
P.O. Box 37069, OVERPORT, Durban, 4067
76 Valley View Rd, Morningside, DBN, 4001
Tel: 031 303 2835
Email: [email protected]
Prepared for:
Geo Hydraulic & Environmental Technology (Pty) Ltd
23G Failsworth Road
Pietermaritzburg
3201
Tel: 033 811 1714
Email: [email protected]
Afzelia Environmental Consultants
Vegetation Assessment: Proposed Khetshe Housing Development, Newcastle Local Municipality Page 1
Declaration
I, Ntando Kumalo, declare that - General declaration
I act as the independent specialist in this matter;
I do not have and will not have any vested interest (either business, financial, personal or other) in the
undertaking of the proposed activity, other than remuneration for work performed in terms of the
Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2014;
I will perform the work relating to the application in an objective manner, even if this results in views and
findings that are not favourable to the applicant;
I declare that there are no circumstances that may compromise my objectivity in performing such work;
I have expertise in conducting the specialist assessment relevant to this application, including knowledge of
the National Environmental Management Act (Act 107 of 1998) (NEMA), regulations and any guidelines that
have relevance to the proposed activity;
I will comply with the NEMA Act, regulations and all other applicable legislation; and
I undertake to disclose to the applicant and the competent authority all material information in my
possession that reasonably has or may have the potential of influencing any decision to be taken with
respect to the application by the competent authority; and the objectivity of any report, plan or document to
be prepared by myself for submission to the competent authority; all the particulars furnished by me in this
report are true and correct.
Signature of the specialist:
27 October 2016
Specialist: Afzelia Environmental Consultants Pty Ltd
Contact person: Mr. N. Kumalo
Qualification: B.Sc. (Hons) Forest Resources and Wildlife Management
Postal address: 76 Valley View Road, Morningside
Postal code: 4001 Cell: 076 589 2250
Telephone: (031) 303 2835 Fax: 086 692 2547
E-mail: [email protected]
Professional affiliation(s) (if any) SACNASP (pending) IAIAsa
Reviewer: GJ McDonald SACNASP reg. no. 400083/97
Afzelia Environmental Consultants
Vegetation Assessment: Proposed Khetshe Housing Development, Newcastle Local Municipality Page 2
Definition of Terms
Biodiversity
The wide variety of plant and animal species occurring in their natural environment
(habitats). The term encompasses different ecosystems, landscapes, communities,
populations and genes as well as the ecological and evolutionary processes that allow
these elements of biodiversity to persist over time.
Conservation The safeguarding of biodiversity and its processes (often referred to as Biodiversity
Conservation).
Ezemvelo KZN
Wildlife
Ezemvelo KwaZulu-Natal Wildlife, the local conservation authority for the Province of
KwaZulu-Natal.
Endemic
Refers to a plant, animal species or a specific vegetation type which is naturally restricted
to a defined region (not to be confused with indigenous). A species of animal may, for
example, be endemic to South Africa in which case it occurs naturally anywhere in the
country, or endemic only to a specific geographical area within the country, which means it
is restricted to this area and grows naturally nowhere else in the country.
Grassland A grassland is a vegetation community in which grasses are the most conspicuous plants
Habitat The general features of an area inhabited by animal or plant which are essential to its
survival (i.e. the natural “home” of a plant or animal species).
Indigenous Naturally occurring or “native” to a broad area, such as South Africa in this context.
Invasive alien
plants
Alien invasive species (IAPs) means any non-indigenous plant or animal species whose
establishment and spread outside of its natural range threatens natural ecosystems,
habitats or other species or has the potential to threaten ecosystems, habitats or another
species.
Mitigate/Mitigation
Mitigating impacts refers to reactive practical actions that minimize or reduce in situ
impacts. Examples of mitigation include “changes to the scale, design, location, siting,
process, sequencing, phasing, and management and/or monitoring of the proposed
activity, as well as restoration or rehabilitation of sites”. Mitigation actions can take place
anywhere, as long as their effect is to reduce the effect on the site where change in
ecological character is likely, or the values of the site are affected by those changes
(Ramsar Convention, 2012).
Systematic
conservation plan
An approach to conservation that prioritises actions by setting quantitative targets for
biodiversity features such as broad habitat units or vegetation types. It is premised on
conserving a representative sample of biodiversity pattern, including species and habitats
(the principle of representation), as well as the ecological and evolutionary processes that
maintain biodiversity over time (the principle of persistence).
Threatened
ecosystem
In the context of this document, refers to Critically Endangered, Endangered and
Vulnerable ecosystems.
Threat Status
Threat status (of a species or community type) is a simple but highly integrated indicator of
vulnerability. It contains information about past loss (of numbers and / or habitat), the
number and intensity of threats, and current prospects as indicated by recent population
growth or decline. Any one of these metrics could be used to measure vulnerability. One
much used example of a threat status classification system is the IUCN Red List of
Threatened Species (BBOP, 2009).
Transformation
(habitat loss)
Refers to the destruction and clearing an area of its indigenous vegetation, resulting in
loss of natural habitat. In many instances, this can and has led to the partial or complete
breakdown of natural ecological processes.
Afzelia Environmental Consultants
Vegetation Assessment: Proposed Khetshe Housing Development, Newcastle Local Municipality Page 3
Abbreviations / Acronyms used
CR Critically Endangered (threat status)
DAFF Department of Forestry and Fisheries
DWS Department of Water and Sanitation (formerly DWA/F)
EKZNW Ezemvelo KwaZulu-Natal Wildlife: as defined in Act 9 of 1997 to be the KZN Nature Conservation
Service
EMPr Environmental Management Programme
EN Endangered (threat status)
GIS Geographical Information Systems
GPS Global Positioning System
IAPs Invasive Alien Plants
LT Least Threatened (threat status)
NEMA National Environmental Management Act No.107 of 1998
NEM:BA National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act No.10 of 2004
NT Near Threatened (threat status)
NWA National Water Act No.36 of 1998
SANBI South African National Biodiversity Institute
VU Vulnerable (threat status)
Afzelia Environmental Consultants
Vegetation Assessment: Proposed Khetshe Housing Development, Newcastle Local Municipality Page 4
Executive summary
Afzelia Environmental Consultants (Pty) Ltd was appointed by Geo Hydraulic & Environmental Technology (Pty)
Ltd to do a vegetation assessment for the proposed development of Khetshe. The proposed development
entails:
Residential housing units;
Services and associated infrastructure (such as access roads and stormwater facilities); and
Social amenities.
The main findings of this report have been summarized below:
The dominant plant communities in the study area are secondary grasslands.
The dominant species in the grasslands are Cynodon dactylon (Couch grass), Aristida congesta subsp.
barbicollis (Spreading three-awn) and Bothriochloa bladhii (Purple plume grass).
Alien species found in the grassland include Opuntia humifusa (Large-flowered prickly pear), Opuntia
ficus-indica (Sweet prickly pear), Solanum elaeagnifolium (Silverleaf bitter apple), Melia azedarach
(Syringa), Ipomoea purpurea (Common Morning Glory), Datura ferox (Large thorn-apple), Cirsium
vulgare (Scotch thistle), Lantana camara (Lantana), Agave sisalana (Sisal), A. americana (American
agave), Echium plantagineum (Purple Echium) and Sonchus oleraceus (Sowthistle).
Ledebouria ovatifolia subsp. ovatifolia was the only protected plant species that was encountered.
The ecological sensitivity of the study site is rated as low.
The following recommendations are proposed:
Plant permits must be obtained from relevant authorities prior to any construction commencing.
Once pegged, the construction footprint must be inspected by a botanist and all conservation-important
species identified must be translocated prior to any construction activities.
Indigenous trees removed during construction must be replaced at a ratio of 1:5 (5 trees must be
planted for every 1 tree removed).
An invasive alien control programme must be implemented to prevent the introduction and spread of
these species as per the legislative requirements specified under the Conservation of Agricultural
Resources Act, 1983 amended in 2001 and the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act
2004 (Act No, 10 of 2004).
Loss of indigenous tree species must be kept to a minimum.
Erosion control measures must be implemented in areas sensitive to erosion such as edges of slopes,
exposed soil, etc. These measures include, but are not limited to - the use of sand bags, hessian
sheets, silt fences and retention or replacement of vegetation.
Disturbed areas must be rehabilitated immediately after construction by planting appropriate indigenous
plant species.
The clearing of vegetation must be kept to a minimum and restricted to the working servitude.
During the construction phase, workers must be limited to areas under construction and any access to
undeveloped areas must be strictly regulated.
Rehabilitated areas must be monitored to ensure the establishment of re-vegetated areas and to ensure
a ground cover of 85%.
Afzelia Environmental Consultants
Vegetation Assessment: Proposed Khetshe Housing Development, Newcastle Local Municipality Page 5
Table of Contents
1. Introduction .................................................................................................................6
1.1 Project Background ......................................................................6
1.2 Project Description ......................................................................6
1.3 Scope of Work ......................................................................6
1.4 Relevant Environmental Legislation .........................................7
1.5 Limitations ....................................................................................7
2. Study area .................................................................................................................8
2.1 Regional and Local Settings ........................................................8
2.2 Geology and Soils ........................................................8
2.3 MINSET .....................................................................................8
2.4 Terrestrial Systematic Conservation Plan (C-PLAN) ...........................8
2.5 Vegetation Overview ......................................................................9
2.6 Vegetation/Ecosystem Threat ........................................................9
3. Detailed Vegetation Assessment ......................................................................9
4. Plants of Conservation Significance ......................................................12
5. Invasive Alien Plants .................................................................................................12
6. Impact on vegetation .................................................................................................13
6.1 Significance of impact on the vegetation at the proposed project area 13
6.2 Proliferation of Alien invasive species ........................................14
6.3 Loss of indigenous vegetation due to clearing of the footprint area ......14
7. Recommendations ..................................................................................................15
8. Conclusions ..................................................................................................16
9. References and resources ...................................................................................17
10. APPENDICES .................................................................................................18
APPENDIX A: LOCALITY MAP .....................................................................19
APPENDIX B: VEGETATION TYPE .....................................................................20
APPENDIX C: EKZNW MINSET MAP .....................................................................21
APPENDIX D: LIST OF PLANT SPECIES IDENTIFIED ON SITE ..........................22
APPENDIX E: PLANT SPECIES FOR REHABILITATION ........................................23
APPENDIX F: WAYPOINTS COLLECTED ONSITE ......................................................24
Afzelia Environmental Consultants
Vegetation Assessment: Proposed Khetshe Housing Development, Newcastle Local Municipality Page 6
1. Introduction
1.1 Project Background
Afzelia Environmental Consultants (Pty) Ltd was appointed by Geo Hydraulic & Environmental Technology (Pty)
Ltd (Pty) on behalf of the client NDG Africa to undertake a vegetation assessment report for the proposed
Khetshe housing development located on a portion of Remainder of Erf 15961 in eMadadeni. The proposed
project is located in the Newcastle Local Municipality, within the jurisdiction of the Amajuba District Municipality in
KwaZulu-Natal (Appendix A: Locality map). Access to the site is via the P483. The property can be found at
the following GPS coordinates: 27°46'20.13"S and 30° 2'44.40"E.
1.2 Project Description
The layout design of the proposed residential project had not been finalised at the time this report was being
compiled, therefore using information based on similar projects, it is anticipated that, at the very least, the
following will be established:
Residential housing units;
Services and associated infrastructure (such as access roads and stormwater facilities); and
Social amenities.
1.3 Scope of Work
The scope of work for the botanic assessment is as follows:
Contextualization of the study area in terms of important biophysical characteristics and terrestrial
conservation planning information available at the time of the study, including:
o Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife’s Terrestrial Systematic Conservation Plan (C-PLAN, 2010);
o Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife’s Provincial Vegetation Map (2011);
o National Vegetation Types (Mucina & Rutherford, 2006); and
o Data from the Strategic Environmental Assessment of the Province (eKZNw, 2010).
Desktop identification of species of conservation concern (flora/plants) potentially occurring on the property
based on available species records for the region (i.e. SANBI’s online threatened species database:
PRECIS).
Field survey of the terrestrial vegetation and habitat/s within the proposed construction footprint.
Identification and mapping of the geographic location of any plant species of conservation concern (i.e.
threatened or protected plants/trees) noted during the site survey.
Assessment of significance of potential impacts to terrestrial vegetation and habitat/s arising from the
construction and operation of the project, including broad comment on any anticipated cumulative impacts.
Specialist impact management/mitigation recommendations to avoid/reduce the significance of identified
impacts.
Discuss permit/licensing requirements with regards to plant species of conservation concern.
Describe any assumptions made and any uncertainties or gaps in knowledge, as well as identifying the need
for any future specialist inputs should these be deemed relevant to the project.
Compilation of a botanic report outlining the methods and outcomes of the survey.
A ground-truthing exercise was conducted on 14 October 2016 (early spring). This entailed a site walk-over
along a number of longitudinal transects within the entire proposed project area. The following data were
collected in the field:
Inventory of all species identified in the field. Where certain species could not be identified, samples and photographs were taken to cross reference with available literature.
Afzelia Environmental Consultants
Vegetation Assessment: Proposed Khetshe Housing Development, Newcastle Local Municipality Page 7
Identification of anthropogenic impacts on the vegetation community.
Identifying areas of conservation and / or ecological importance.
Consideration of invasive alien plants and rehabilitation potential of natural areas (if present).
An overall assessment of the vegetation integrity on site; and
Geographic location of conservation-important species as identified by relevant national and provincial
legislations and marking them using a Garmin 60 DakotaTM 20.
The study area was divided into different vegetation integrity types based on ecological functionality, sensitivity
and level of transformation, as follows:
High ecological integrity: high ecological functioning and high conservation importance;
Moderate ecological integrity: moderate ecological functioning and moderate conservation importance; and
Low ecological integrity: low ecological functioning and low conservation importance.
1.4 Relevant Environmental Legislations
The following legislations govern terrestrial ecosystems, habitat and vegetation in South Africa: 1. Section 24 of The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa;
2. Agenda 21 – Action plan for sustainable development of the Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEAT)
1998;
3. National Environmental Management Act (NEMA) No. 107 of 1998 inclusive of all amendments;
4. National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (NEMBA) No. 10 of 2004;
5. Conservation of Agricultural Resources Act No. 43 of 1983;
6. National Forests Act No. 84 of 1998; and
7. At a Provincial level, plant species are protected by the Natal Nature Conservation Ordinance (No. 15 of 1974).
1.5 Limitations:
The following assumptions and limitation apply for this particular project:
The report exclusively presents findings associated with study area.
The study focuses on terrestrial vegetation occurring within the area.
Garmin DakotaTM 20 Global Positioning System (GPS) was used to record species of conservation
significance and distinct habitats, and captured on a Geographical Information System (GIS). GPS accuracy
is limited to 3-5m.
The field assessment was carried out during early spring (October 2016) and does not address temporal
changes related to season.
Vegetation is dynamic and complex, therefore, some important aspects may have been overlooked.
Sampling in nature is not exhaustive; not all aspects of the ecosystem can be assessed and identified.
Information relating to the threatened status of species is based on SANBI’s online tool, which is assumed to
be up to date during the compilation of this report.
The assessment of potential occurrence of species is informed by readily available information and this only
provides an indication of which species might occur on site; and
The assessment of impacts and resulting recommendations made in this report are based on site specific
ecological concerns arising from the vegetation survey and are also based on the specialist’s knowledge and
experience with similar projects.
Afzelia Environmental Consultants
Vegetation Assessment: Proposed Khetshe Housing Development, Newcastle Local Municipality Page 8
2. Study Area
2.1 Regional and Local Settings
The following table is a summary of the biophysical setting of the project site and surrounding areas.
Biophysical Aspects Desktop Biophysical Details Source
Elevation 1240–1270m Google Earth TM
Mean annual precipitation (MAP) 750mm (Mucina & Rutherford,
2006)
Rainfall seasonality Summer rainfall, and mid-winter
June and July DWAF, 2007
Mean annual temperature 15.6 – 19 °C DWAF, 2007
Potential Evaporation (mm) Mean Annual A-
pan Equivalent 1 725mm (Shulze, 1997)
2.2 Geology and Soils
A variety of Karoo Supergroup rocks occur in the area, including the Dwyka, Ecca and Beaufort Groups and
marginally also Jurassic dolerite intrusions. Yellow-brown soils over plinthic subsoil and shallow duplex soils are
common. Notwithstanding that Red and black heavy soils which are highly resistant to erosion are derived from
dolerites, gullies were observed throughout the site.
2.3 MINSET
The eKZNw Minset is a strategic plan to ensure that representative samples of biodiversity are conserved in the province. The Minset GIS database facilitates decision-making for land use and conservation planning, with the aim of meeting development and biodiversity conservation goals in KwaZulu-Natal. The Minset database identifies the minimum number of planning units contained within the province which are required to meet biodiversity conservation targets. The database spatially classifies planning units into the following categories:
1. Existing Protected area network – Planning units that comprise areas which are formally protected under the National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Act (No 57 of 2003) as amended.
2. 100 % Transformed – Planning units that are 100% transformed in terms of natural asset according to the 2005 eKZNw land cover dataset.
3. Outside Province – Planning units which fall outside of the KZN provincial boundary. 4. Biodiversity Priority Area 1- Planning units which contain features that, if lost, eKZNw conservation targets
cannot be met in any other planning unit within the Province. 5. Biodiversity Priority Area 2– Planning units which contain features that, if lost, eKZNw conservation
targets can only be met in a very limited number of alternative planning units within the Province. 6. Biodiversity Priority Area 3 - Planning units which contain features that, if lost, eKZNw conservation
targets can only be met in a limited number of alternative planning units within the Province.
2.4 Terrestrial Systematic Conservation Plan (C-PLAN)
The KwaZulu-Natal Terrestrial Conservation Plan is a tool used to identify Critical Biodiversity Areas (CBAs) and
Critical Ecological Support Areas (CESAs). According to eKZNw (2010) a CBA is considered a significant area
that needs to be kept in a near-natural state to ensure the continued functioning of ecosystems. A CBA
represents the best choice for achieving biodiversity targets. CESAs are not essential for achieving targets, but
they play a vital role in the continued functioning of ecosystems.
The proposed development area falls within biodiversity areas classified as “vulnerable area” in terms of the KZN
Terrestrial Systematic Conservation Plan (See Appendix C). This classification means the area is important to
conservation targets that can only be met in these planning units and no-where else (EKZNW, 2010). It is worth
Afzelia Environmental Consultants
Vegetation Assessment: Proposed Khetshe Housing Development, Newcastle Local Municipality Page 9
noting that the distribution of the biodiversity features is not always applicable to the entire extent of the PU
(Planning Unit), but is more often than not confined to a specific niche habitat (e.g. a wetland) reflected as a
portion of the PU in question. The following flora and vegetation types are known or modelled to exist within the
study area:
KwaZulu-Natal Highland Thornveld (present on the site, however the quality is severely transformed)
Also, invertebrate species such as Doratogonus falcatus, Cochlitoma simplex, Whitea alticeps and Gullela orientalis are predicted to occur on site, however they likely to be absent due to the transformation of the proposed development site. The site is severely disturbed, which is a factor that militates against the presence of sensitive species. Also, local populations are unlikely due to the limited extent of pristine habitat in the surrounding areas.
2.5 Vegetation Overview
At a broad scale the study area falls within the extensive Grassland Biome (Mucina & Rutherford, 2006 and
Scott-Shaw and Escott, 2011). At a local scale the study area falls within KwaZulu-Natal Highland Thornveld
(Gs 6); Income Sandy Grassland and Temperate Alluvial Vegetation. See (Appendix B: Vegetation Type Map).
Hilly, undulating landscapes and broad valleys supporting tall tussock grassland usually dominated by
Hyparrhenia hirta, with occasional savannoid woodlands with scattered Acacia sieberiana var. woodii and in
small pockets with A. karroo and A. nilotica (Mucina & Rutherford, 2006).
In terms of vegetation type threatened status, this vegetation type is classified as Least Threatened (Appendix
C: Threatened ecosystem map). Only about 2% is statutorily conserved in the Spioenkop, Weenen, Ntinini,
Wagendrift, Moor Park and Tugela Drift Nature Reserves. More than 16% has been transformed for cultivation
and by urban sprawl as well as by building of dams (Craigieburn, Spioenkop, Wagendrift and Windsor). Alien
Opuntia, Eucalyptus, Populus, Acacia and Melia are becoming invasive in places, but probably the greatest
threat to the remaining natural areas of this unit is bush encroachment. (Mucina & Rutherford, 2006).
2.6 Vegetation/Ecosystem Threat
Ecosystem threat status indicates the degree to which ecosystems are still intact or alternatively losing vital
aspects of their structure, function and composition on which their ability to provide ecosystem services ultimately
depends (SANBI, 2012). Ecosystem types are categorized as Critically Endangered (CR), Endangered (EN),
Vulnerable (VU) or Least Threatened (LT) based on the proportion of each ecosystem type that remains in good
ecological condition relative to a series of thresholds.
Parts of the proposed development area are classified within the MINSET database as Biodiversity Priority Area
3 (Appendix C: EKZNW MINSET map) this vegetation type is considered important for achieving conservation
targets.
3. Detailed Vegetation Assessment
For the purposes of this the study area has been divided into one (1) distinct vegetation community which was identified, based on the ecological integrity and degree of disturbance: The vegetation on the study site consists of secondary grassland vegetation. Alien species were scattered within the proposed project area, a clear indication of the significant escalation of transformation, associated with urbanisation taking place in the area. The proposed project area is encompassed by housing, road and recreational infrastructures.
Secondary Grassland
A large part of the development property consists of secondary grassland vegetation. The dominant grass
species are Aristida congesta subsp. barbicollis (Spreading three-awn), Cynodon dactylon (Couch grass) and
Afzelia Environmental Consultants
Vegetation Assessment: Proposed Khetshe Housing Development, Newcastle Local Municipality Page 10
Bothriochloa bladhii (Purple plume grass). Other grass species include Themeda triandra (Red grass)
Cymbopogon excavatus (Broad-leaved turpentine grass), Melinis repens (Natal Red top) and Hyparrhenia hirta
(Common thatching grass), Eragrostis plana (Tough love grass), Digitaria ternata (Black-seed finger grass),
Setaria sphacelata var. sphacelata (Common Bristle grass), Aristida congesta subsp. congesta (Tassel three-
awn), A. bipartita (rolling grass), Chloris virgata (Feather-top Chloris), Chloris gayana (Rhodes grass), Urochloa
mosambicensis (Bushveld signal grass) and Digitaria eriantha (Common finger grass).
Figure 1: Secondary grasslands at the proposed development site.
Figure 2: Old culvert structure situated within the proposed development site.
Herbaceous species found in the grassland include Ledebouria ovatifolia subsp. ovatifolia, Bulbine narcissifolia
(Strap-leaved Bulbine) and Gazania krebsiana (Common Gazania).
Alien species found in the grassland include Opuntia humifusa (Large-flowered prickly pear), Opuntia ficus-indica
(Sweet prickly pear), Solanum elaeagnifolium (Silverleaf bitter apple), Melia azedarach (Syringa), Ipomoea
purpurea (Common Morning Glory), Datura ferox (Large thorn-apple), Tagetes minuta (Tall Khaki Weed),
Afzelia Environmental Consultants
Vegetation Assessment: Proposed Khetshe Housing Development, Newcastle Local Municipality Page 11
Cirsium vulgare (Scotch thistle), Lantana camara (Lantana), Agave sisalana (Sisal), A. americana (American
agave), Eucalyptus sp., Echium plantagineum (Purple Echium); and Sonchus oleraceus (Sowthistle). Alien tree
species like Pinus pinaster (Pine) and Populus x canescens (Grey Poplar) are dominant along the southeast and
northwest portion of the proposed development site.
Figure 3: Informal housing developments and illegal dumping taking place at the proposed project site.
Figure 4: A soccer field that has been established, also situated within the proposed development site.
Ecological significance
The vegetation within the proposed development area is largely modified, with transformation taking place at a
broad scale. Uniform disturbances were observed throughout this area. Large scale erosion gullies were present
southwest of the development property. Ledebouria ovatifolia subsp. ovatifolia was the only protected plant
species that was encountered. In the event of any damage or disturbance to specimens of these species,
permits from Ezemvelo KwaZulu-Natal Wildlife (EKZNw) would be required prior to any construction activity
commencing. The ecological sensitivity of the study site is rated as low.
Afzelia Environmental Consultants
Vegetation Assessment: Proposed Khetshe Housing Development, Newcastle Local Municipality Page 12
4. Plants of Conservation Significance
Legislation exists at both provincial and national levels which serve to protect and preserve important plant taxa,
particularly those that are considered to be of conservation value. The purpose is to ensure the long-term
survival of these species. One (1) protected indigenous species namely Ledebouria ovatifolia subsp. ovatifolia
was identified in the study area.
Figure 5: A plant permit must be obtained for the Ledebouria ovatifolia subsp. ovatifolia species that was found onsite.
5. Invasive Alien Plants
Invasive alien plants are described as species which are ‘non-indigenous’ to an area and which have been
introduced from other countries either intentionally (for domestic or commercial use) or accidentally; furthermore,
they have the ability to reproduce and spread without the direct assistance of people into natural or semi-natural
habitats and are destructive to biodiversity and human interests (WESSA-KZN, 2008).
Notice 3 of the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act 2004 (Act No, 10 of 2004) lists 379 plant
species that are legally declared invasive species. Each species is assigned to one of three categories based on
the level of threat posed by the species and the legal status assigned to each:
Category 1a Plant species that must be combatted or eradicated.
Category 1b Plant species that must be controlled.
Category 2 Plant species that must not be allowed to spread outside any property.
Category 3 Plant species that when occurring in riparian areas must be considered to be category 1b
Listed Invasive Species and must be managed according to regulation 3 of NEM:BA, 2014
Please review Appendix F for details on these species.
Afzelia Environmental Consultants
Vegetation Assessment: Proposed Khetshe Housing Development, Newcastle Local Municipality Page 13
6. Impact on vegetation
6.1 Significance of impact on the vegetation at the proposed project area.
Any development activity in a natural system will have an impact on the surrounding environment, usually in a
negative way. The purpose of this phase of the study is to identify and assess the significance of the potential
impacts caused by the proposed development and to provide a description of the mitigation required so as to
limit the identified impacts on the natural environment. A number of potential impacts on the botanical
biodiversity relate to loss of indigenous vegetation, and proliferation of alien invasive species.
Significance scoring assesses and predicts the significance of environmental impacts through evaluation of the
following factors; probability of the impact; duration of the impact; extent of the impact; and magnitude of the
impact. The significance of environmental impacts is then assessed taking into account any proposed
mitigations. The significance of the impact “without mitigation” is the prime determinant of the nature and degree
of mitigation required. Each of the above impacts factors have been used to assess the impact on the vegetation
on each of the activities using ranking scales (Table 1).
Unknown parameters are given the highest score (5) as significance scoring follows the Precautionary Principle.
The Precautionary Principle is based on the following statement: When the information available to an evaluator
is uncertain as to whether or not the impact of a proposed development on the environment will be adverse, the
evaluator must accept as a matter of precaution, that the impact will be detrimental. It is a test to determine the
acceptability of a proposed development. It enables the evaluator to determine whether enough information is
available to ensure that a reliable decision can be made.
Table 1: Significance scoring used for impact on the vegetation
Probability Duration
1 - very improbable
2 - improbable
3 - probable
4 - highly probable
5 - definite
1 - very short duration (0-1 years)
2- short duration (2-5 years)
3 - medium term (5-15 years)
4 - long term (>15 years)
5 - permanent/unknown
Extent Magnitude
1 - limited to the site
2 - limited to the local area
3 - limited to the region
4 - national
5 - international
2 – minor
4 – low
6 – moderate
8 – high
10 – very high
Significance Points = (Magnitude + Duration + Extent) x Probability
The maximum value is 100 Significance Points. Potential Environmental Impacts are rated as high, moderate or
low significance as per the following:
<30 significance points = Low environmental significance
31-59 significance points = Moderate environmental significance
>60 significance points = High environmental significance
Afzelia Environmental Consultants
Vegetation Assessment: Proposed Khetshe Housing Development, Newcastle Local Municipality Page 14
6.2 Proliferation of Alien invasive species
Alien invasive species will quickly encroach into the disturbed areas. Alien species generally out-compete
indigenous species for water, light, space and nutrients as they are adaptable to changing conditions and are
able to easily invade a wide range of ecological niches (Bromilow, 2010). Alien invader plant species pose an
ecological threat as they alter habitat structure, lower biodiversity (both number and “quality” of species), change
nutrient cycling and productivity, and modify food webs (Zedler and Kercher, 2004).
Impacts associated with the construction phase of the activities
Impact
Probability Duration Extent Magnitude Significance
scoring
without
mitigation
Significance
scoring with
mitigation Without With Without With Without With Without With
Construction Phase
Spread
of Alien
invasive
species
5 3 3 2 1 1 10 8 70
(High)
33
(Moderate)
Operational Phase
Spread
of Alien
invasive
species
5 3 3 2 1 1 10 8 70
(High)
33
(Moderate)
Recommended Mitigation
An invasive alien control programme must be implemented to prevent its introduction and spread, as per the
legislative requirements specified under the Conservation of Agricultural Resources Act, 1983 amended in
2001 and the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act 2004 (Act No, 10 of 2004).
Ongoing alien plant control must be undertaken and implemented for the clearing/eradication of alien
species during the construction and operational phases of the housing project;
6.3 Loss of indigenous vegetation due to clearing of the footprint area
During the construction phase the area for the proposed housing development will be cleared of vegetation. This
will result in the loss of indigenous species, disturbance of species of conservation concern and the
fragmentation of vegetation communities. The removal of vegetation will also expose soil increasing the risk of
erosion.
The vegetation on the site is in relative good condition, as compared to the surrounding areas, sensitive
grasslands were identified. With the implementation of mitigation measures recommended below, this impact will
be minimised.
Afzelia Environmental Consultants
Vegetation Assessment: Proposed Khetshe Housing Development, Newcastle Local Municipality Page 15
7. Recommendations
In general, the vegetation in the study site is of low ecological importance, with surrounding areas completely
transformed by residential developments, such as the Emadadeni townships.
The following mitigating measures and recommendations are proposed at levels appropriate to the
impact:
Plant permits must be obtained from relevant authorities prior to any construction commencing.
Once pegged, the proposed development site must be inspected by a botanist and all conservation-
important species identified must be translocated prior to any construction activities.
Indigenous trees removed during construction must be replaced at a ratio of 1:5 (5 trees must be planted for
every 1 tree removed).
An invasive alien control programme must be implemented to prevent the introduction and spread of these
species as per the legislative requirements specified under the Conservation of Agricultural Resources Act,
1983 amended in 2001 and the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act 2004 (Act No, 10 of
2004).
Loss of indigenous tree species must be kept to a minimum;
Erosion control measures must be implemented in areas sensitive to erosion such as edges of slopes,
exposed soil, etc. These measures include but are not limited to - the use of sand bags, hessian sheets, silt
fences and retention or replacement of vegetation.
Disturbed areas must be rehabilitated immediately after construction by planting appropriate indigenous
plant species.
The clearing of vegetation must be kept to a minimum and restricted to the working servitude.
During the construction phase workers must be limited to areas under construction within the project
footprint and access to the undeveloped areas must be strictly regulated.
Rehabilitated areas must be monitored to ensure the establishment of re-vegetated areas and to ensure a
ground cover of 85%.
Impacts associated with the clearing of vegetation
Impact
Probability Duration Extent Magnitude Significance
scoring
without
mitigation
Significance
scoring with
mitigation Without With Without With Without With Without With
Construction Phase
Loss of
indigenous
vegetation
5 5 3 2 1 1 10 8 70
(High)
55
(Moderate)
Operational Phase
Fragmentation
of vegetation
communities
5 5 3 2 1 1 10 8 70
(High)
55
Moderate)
Afzelia Environmental Consultants
Vegetation Assessment: Proposed Khetshe Housing Development, Newcastle Local Municipality Page 16
8. Conclusions
Taking into consideration that the proposed activity will involve the clearing of natural vegetation, and
subsequently the loss of ecological biodiversity within the project area is inevitable. Therefore, in line with the
guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment (EIAs), in terms of the risk averse principle stipulated in Section
2 of the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA) (Act 107 of 1998), a second botanical site-walk over
must be conducted before construction to identify any conservation significant herbaceous plants, the site walk-
over must be conducted by a suitable qualified specialist before construction commences. At a minimum, the site
must be surveyed twice to capture peak spring/early summer and late summer/early autumn identification
periods. Lack of inflorescence may have limited the identification of conservation-significant plant species
potentially occurring onsite since herbaceous or bulbous plants have a brief flowering period and die back
completely during the winter and early spring season, or after flowering. It should be borne into consideration that
a survey can confirm the presence of rare species in a study area, but seldom rules out the existence of rare
species in a study area, therefore, the more an area is surveyed, the greater is the likelihood of identifying these
seasonal species that are of conservation significance.
The study site contains conservation-significant Ledebouria ovatifolia subsp. ovatifolia, protected at a regional
level according to the Natal Nature Conservation Ordinance (No. 15 of 1974).
Whilst the vegetation type of the site represents KwaZulu-Natal Highland Thornveld, and C-Plan indicates portion
of the site lying within Biodiversity Priority Area 3 (vulnerable), the site is unlikely to contribute meaningfully to
conservation targets in the long term as the surrounding area has undergone transformation and this has
resulted in the severe degradation of vegetation, with historical composition altered by human intrusive activities,
such as urbanization and the consequential spread of alien vegetation.
Provided mitigation measures presented in this report, and best practise measures are carried out to avoid detrimental impacts associated with the construction phase of the project, no significant biodiversity constraints would prevent the development from being implemented in an environmentally sustainable and justifiable manner.
In the interests of reducing species loss as result of urban development all indigenous plant species should be
protected as a principle, and where possible these should be retained to the final landscaping plan. Section 6 of
this report which deals with ‘Impact on Vegetation’ be included in the Construction Environmental Management
Programme (EMPr) and referenced in the EA for this project as a specific condition of the EA.
Also, Temperate Alluvial Vegetation noted to occur within the site is usually associated with alluvial type
wetlands, as such, a competent and experienced wetland specialist must be consulted to establish the
presence/absence of such wetland/s before the commencement of the project. A Water Use License must be
obtained from the Department of Water and Sanitation (DWS) should any development take place within 500m
from the edge of a delineated wetland.
Should you have any queries regarding the above please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned, or any of
our consultant from Afzelia Environmental Consultants, through the details provided below.
Yours faithfully
Ntando Kumalo Bsc (Hon) Forest Resources and Wildlife Management (NUST) Ecologist at Afzelia Environmental Consultant Email: [email protected] Tel: 031 303 2835
Afzelia Environmental Consultants
Vegetation Assessment: Proposed Khetshe Housing Development, Newcastle Local Municipality Page 17
9. References and Resources
Boon R. 2010. Pooley’s Trees of Eastern South Africa: A complete guide. Flora and Fauna Publications Trust, Durban. Bromilow C. 2010. Problem plants and alien weeds of South Africa. Briza Publications, Pretoria. EKZNW 2010. Terrestrial Systematic Conservation Plan: Minimum Selection Surface (MINSET). Unpublished
GIS Coverage [tscp_minset_dist_2010_wll.zip], Biodiversity Conservation Planning Division, Ezemvelo KZN
Wildlife, P. O. Box 13053, Cascades, Pietermaritzburg, 3202.
Henderson L. 2001. Alien weeds and invasive plants. Pretoria. Manning J. 2009. Field guide to wild flowers of South Africa. Struik Nature. Cape Town. Mucina & Rutherford (eds) 2006. The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Strelitzia 19. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria. Pooley E. 1998. A field guide to the wild flowers of KwaZulu-Natal and the eastern region. Natal Flora Publications Trust, Durban. SANBI. 2012. National Biodiversity Assessment 2011: An assessment of South Africa’s biodiversity and ecosystems. Synthesis Report. South African National Biodiversity Institute and Department of Environmental Affairs, Pretoria. Schulze RE.1997. South African Atlas of Geohydrology and – Climatology. Water Research Commission, Pretoria, RSA. Technology Transfer Report TT82/96. Scott-Shaw, CR and Escott, BJ. (Eds) 2011. KwaZulu-Natal Provincial Pre-Transformation Vegetation Type Map
– 2011. Unpublished GIS Coverage [kznveg05v2_1_11_wll.zip], Biodiversity Conservation Planning Division,
Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife, P. O. Box 13053, Cascades, Pietermaritzburg, 3202.
Van Oudtshoorn F. 1992. Guide to grasses of South Africa. Briza publications, Arcadia. Van Wyk B & van Wyk P. 2007.Field guide to trees of South Africa. Struik Publishers. Cape Town. WESSA-KZN. 2008. Invasive alien plants in KwaZulu-Natal, management and control. Wildlife & Environment Society of South Africa, KwaZulu-Natal Region. Zedler, J and Kercher, S. 2004. Causes and Consequences of Invasive Plants in Wetlands: Opportunities,
Opportunists, and Outcomes. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 23(5):431–452 (2004).
Afzelia Environmental Consultants
Vegetation Assessment: Proposed Khetshe Housing Development, Newcastle Local Municipality Page 18
10. APPENDICES
Afzelia Environmental Consultants
Vegetation Assessment: Proposed Khetshe Housing Development, Newcastle Local Municipality Page 19
APPENDIX A: LOCALITY MAP
Afzelia Environmental Consultants
Vegetation Assessment: Proposed Khetshe Housing Development, Newcastle Local Municipality Page 20
APPENDIX B: VEGETATION TYPE
Afzelia Environmental Consultants
Vegetation Assessment: Proposed Khetshe Housing Development, Newcastle Local Municipality Page 21
APPENDIX C: EKZNW MINSET
Afzelia Environmental Consultants
Vegetation Assessment: Proposed Khetshe Housing Development, Newcastle Local Municipality Page 22
APPENDIX D: LIST OF PLANT SPECIES IDENTIFIED ON SITE
Botanical Name Common Name Plant Type Alien Species
Invasive Status
(Category as per NEM:BA)
Agave americana American agave Succulent X
Agave sisalana Sisal Succulent X
Aristida bipartita Rolling grass Graminoid
Aristida congesta subsp. barbicollis Spreading three-awn Graminoid
Aristida congesta subsp. congesta Tassel three-awn Graminoid
Bothriochloa bladhii Purple plume grass Graminoid
Bulbine narcissifolia Strap-leaved Bulbine Herbaceous
Chloris gayana Rhodes grass Graminoid
Chloris virgata Feather-top Chloris Graminoid
Cirsium vulgare Scotch thistle Herbaceous X 1b
Cymbopogon exavatus Broad-leaved turpentine grass Graminoid
Cynodon dactylon Couch grass Graminoid
Datura ferox Large thorn-apple Herbaceous X 1b
Digitaria ternata Black-seed finger grass Graminoid
Digitaria eriantha Common finger grass Graminoid
Echium plantagineum Purple echium Graminoid X 1b
Eragrostis plana Tough love grass Graminoid
Eragrostis curvula Weeping love grass Graminoid
Eucalyptus sp. Eucalyptus Woody X 1b
Gazania krebsiana Common Gazania Herbaceous
Hyparrhenia hirta Common thatching grass Graminoid
Lantana camara Common Lantana Herbaceous X 1b
Ledebouria ovatifolia subsp. ovatifolia Herbaceous
Melia azedarach Syringa Woody X 1b
Melinis repens Natal Red top Graminoid
Opuntia humifusa Large-flowered prickly pear Succulent X 1b
Opuntia ficus-indica Sweet prickly pear Succulent X 1b
Pinus pinaster Pine Woody X 1b
Populus x canescens Grey Poplar Woody X 2
Setaria verticillata Bur Bristle grass Graminoid
Sonchus asper subsp. asper Spiny sowthistle Herbaceous X
Sonchus oleraceus Common Sowthistle Herbaceous X
Tagetes minuta Tall Khaki Weed Herbaceous X
Themeda triandra Red grass Graminoid
Urochloa mosambicensis Bushveld signal grass Graminoid
Afzelia Environmental Consultants
Vegetation Assessment: Proposed Khetshe Housing Development, Newcastle Local Municipality Page 23
APPENDIX E: PLANT SPECIES FOR REHABILITATION
Botanical Name Common Name
Tree species
Acacia sieberiana var. woodii Paperbark thorn
Acacia natalitia Pale bark sweet thorn
Acacia nilotica Scented pod thorn
Cussonia spicata Cabbage tree
Dichrostachys cinerea Sickle bush
Ziziphus mucronata Buffalo thorn
Grass species
Andropogon eucomus Snowflake grass
Aristida bipartita Rolling grass
Aristida congesta Three awn grass
Cynodon dactylon Couch grass
Elionurus muticus Wire grass
Eragrostis capensis Heart-seed love grass
Hyparrhenia hirta Common thatching grass
Afzelia Environmental Consultants
Vegetation Assessment: Proposed Khetshe Housing Development, Newcastle Local Municipality Page 24
APPENDIX F: WAYPOINTS COLLECTED ONSITE
Plant Species Waypoint Latitude Longitude
Ledebouria ovatifolia subsp. ovatifolia 78 -27.7770 30.04343
Ledebouria ovatifolia subsp. ovatifolia 85 -27.7698 30.04949
Ledebouria ovatifolia subsp. ovatifolia 86 -27.7697 30.04958
Ledebouria ovatifolia subsp. ovatifolia 87 -27.7697 30.04943
Ledebouria ovatifolia subsp. ovatifolia 88 -27.7693 30.04942
Ledebouria ovatifolia subsp. ovatifolia 89 -27.7693 30.0494
Ledebouria ovatifolia subsp. ovatifolia 90 -27.7693 30.04937
Ledebouria ovatifolia subsp. ovatifolia 91 -27.7692 30.04936
Ledebouria ovatifolia subsp. ovatifolia 92 -27.7692 30.04944
Ledebouria ovatifolia subsp. ovatifolia 93 -27.7692 30.04944
Ledebouria ovatifolia subsp. ovatifolia 94 -27.7691 30.04944
Ledebouria ovatifolia subsp. ovatifolia 95 -27.7691 30.04952
Ledebouria ovatifolia subsp. ovatifolia 96 -27.7691 30.04953
Ledebouria ovatifolia subsp. ovatifolia 97 -27.7691 30.04955
Ledebouria ovatifolia subsp. ovatifolia 98 -27.7691 30.04958
Ledebouria ovatifolia subsp. ovatifolia 99 -27.7691 30.04961
Ledebouria ovatifolia subsp. ovatifolia 100 -27.7691 30.04964
Ledebouria ovatifolia subsp. ovatifolia 101 -27.7692 30.04973
Ledebouria ovatifolia subsp. ovatifolia 102 -27.7693 30.04976
Ledebouria ovatifolia subsp. ovatifolia 103 -27.7693 30.04982
Ledebouria ovatifolia subsp. ovatifolia 104 -27.7694 30.04989
Ledebouria ovatifolia subsp. ovatifolia 105 -27.7694 30.04994