84
JULY 2014 - ISSUE 117 this issue q EAST WEST RAIL q DMU ENERGY BREAKTHROUGH q STATIONS AS A SERVICE q LATEST VIDEO DEVELOPMENTS DAWLISH - SIX MONTHS ON Devon’s rebuilt seawall EDINBURGH CALLING Improving public address in Scotland ERTMS UK TEST SITE Interoperability trials at Hertford REVITALISATION PROGRESSING WELL! An update on Manchester Victoria TECHNOLOGY | DESIGN | M&E | S&T | STATIONS | ENERGY | DEPOTS | PLANT | TRACK | ROLLING STOCK the rail engineer by rail engineers for rail engineers www.therailengineer.com RAIL LIVE 2014 PHOTO: MULHOLLAND MEDIA

The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The Rail Engineer Issue 117 July 2014

Citation preview

Page 1: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

JULY 2014 - ISSUE 117

this issueq EAST WEST RAILq DMU ENERGY BREAKTHROUGHq STATIONS AS A SERVICEq LATEST VIDEO DEVELOPMENTS

DAWLISH - SIX MONTHS ONDevon’s rebuilt seawall

EDINBURGH CALLINGImproving public address in Scotland

ERTMS UK TEST SITEInteroperability trials at Hertford

REVITALISATION PROGRESSING WELL!

An update on Manchester Victoria

TECHNOLOGY | DESIGN | M&E | S&T | STATIONS | ENERGY | DEPOTS | PLANT | TRACK | ROLLING STOCK

the railengineerby rail engineers for rail engineers

www.therailengineer.com

RAIL LIVE 2014

PHOT

O: M

ULHO

LLAN

D M

EDIA

Page 2: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Level Crossing Installations Ltd are skilled installers of all types of

crossings and experienced providers of associated construction services.

Our expertise, backed up by excellent service, has enabled us to build an

ever expanding client base and reputation as a company committed to

delivering work of the highest quality.

We carry out the installation, repair and maintenance of crossings for both

the rail and tram networks and are able to offer a bespoke cut-to-fit

installation service allowing us to overcome the problems presented by

switches and bonding cables.

We also able to install crossings on curved track up to a 50 meter radius and

carry out all associated interface works, including tarmac, kerbs, line marking

and security fencing.

For information, please visit:

www.levelcrossinginstallations.co.uk

or contact our office on 01684278022

Level Crossing Installations

Page 3: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

News 6100mph Thameslink.

Dawlish - six months on 32Collin Carr meets some of the engineers.

East West Rail 36Connecting East Anglia with Central, Southern and Western England.

ERTMS - UK test site 40The interoperability challenge of the British ERTMS signalling system.

Revitalisation progressing well 46Transforming Manchester Victoria station.

Edinburgh calling 50Perfect train announcements relayed from... Nottingham.

Stations as a Service 54A consortium intent on looking at the whole operation of stations.

Video developments in Nottingham 58A step change in CCTV technology at Nottingham Express Transit.

The Internet of All Things Rail 64Moving the management of transport networks to a new level.

The power of 3 66Calipri - a truly portable laser scanner.

DMU energy breakthrough 70Regenerative braking of diesel powered trains.

Contents

10

28

74

76

RAIL Live 2014Railway engineering working in front of an audience.

Plans forprettier columnsJust as efficient but a little more attractive.

Pods go the last mile

An editor’s thoughts on RAIL Live 2014

We’re looking to highlight the latest projects and innovations in

Signalling & Telecommunications InnoTrans Show Issue in the August issue of the rail engineer.

Got a fantastic innovation? Working on a great project? Call Nigel on 01530 816 445 NOW!

See more at www.therailengineer.com

the rail engineer • July 2014 3

Page 4: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

excellence in train control

A Balfour Beatty and Alstom Company

+44 (0) 1923 635 089 [email protected] www.signallingsolutions.comSignalling Solutions Limited, Bridgefoot House, Watling Street, Radlett, WD7 7HT

We are also interested in

hearing from Project Engineers,

Project Planners, Project

Managers, Quantity Surveyors

and Safety Assurance

Engineers in various locations

across the UK.

Due to our growing reputation within the

industry for delivering major projects we

continue to win new and exciting

contracts UK wide.

We have a number of exciting Design

opportunities in our Newport office:

Assistant Designers

Designers

Design Engineers

Design Verifiers

Principle Designers

If you are looking for a new challenge and

are keen to develop your skills then we

can provide you with a unique

opportunity to get involved in and trained

on the latest cutting edge technology,

such as Smartlock, Modular Signalling,

ETCS and next generation signalling.

Signalling Solutions is a company formed

by combining the complementary

signalling resources and products of

Alstom Transport Information Solutions

UK and Balfour Beatty Rail Projects.

We provide individual products and

complete solutions to any customer

requiring design, installation, testing,

commissioning and product support for

signalling, power and telecommunications

applications in the UK.

If you are interested in joining a forward

thinking company where you can make

a real contribution to the success of our

business and feel part of a growing

team then please find out more about

our opportunities on our website:

www.signallingsolutions.com

All the above positions have the following benefits:

We offer a competitive salary plus a range of benefits including

a contributory pension and 25 days holiday.

SIGNALLING SOLUTIONS

OPENS NEWPORT OFFICE

AND IS RECRUITING

Page 5: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Two major exhibitions all within a few weeks. It’s been a hectic time, but at last the orange haze of Rail Live 2014 has dispersed and we’re back to normal - preparing for the next one.

Clive Kessell’s tour de force this month of a trilogy in four parts brings us ERTMS, stations, Edinburgh and CCTV.

Interoperability is a challenge and ensuring that anything coming through the Channel Tunnel will be able to run on the British ERTMS signalling system is just part of the project. Clive has been to the Hertford Loop to see how the companies involved are coming to terms with the realities of the UK rail system. Time is short with main line implementation plans due to start from 2017.

A station as a service. Now there’s a novel idea. As Clive discovers, some of the ideas to improve our lot as we hang around for our trains involve having shops, and more shops on a station. It seems to be called the retail experience - or torture for us engineer mortals. Still, they might be warm.

Clive tells us about intelligent speakers - that is, those used for public announcements at Edinburgh Waverley station. Gone is the undecipherable station waffle hard wired into our comic heritage. Now, in a crisp Scottish accent, perfect train announcements and fire alarm messages rain down on the travellers, having been relayed to Edinburgh from….. Nottingham via Birmingham - yes, truly!

Grainy, jerky images - it’s what you expected from CCTV. Looking at footage of an incident might be useful if only the picture quality was better. Technology has moved on, of course, and today gives us almost HD imagery running 24/7. Clive has been to Nottingham to see the CCTV installed on the new tram

system. There’s just the small matter of needing over 500 terabytes of data storage.

The calculating power of the microprocessor is astonishing. Anything to do with circles, spheres and objects in free space will involve squillions of sums which would take a mere mortal a whole lifetime to crunch. But, as Stuart Marsh’s piece on wheel profile measurement tells us, there is a system out there that will do it all in seconds - and not a slide rule in sight.

It’s useful to reflect on major projects and especially those that took place in a hurry. Collin Carr went back to meet those involved in the Dawlish sea wall washout. With the sun shining and everything back in place it could be easy to forget what went on. There were dire warnings about damage to the local economy - but in fact Dawlish hotels did rather well out of it all.

The old roof over Manchester Victoria station is being dismantled carefully as Collin observes. Ironically, it nearly flew away in the great winds of 1989 and that would have completed the task a good deal quicker. There’s also a reference to the River Irk in a culvert. At 11 metres across it’s some culvert! It’s really large even by railway tunnel standards.

Best get your UK atlas out before reading Collin’s piece on the east/west railway project. Unless you live on the doorstep, some of the waypoints may not be immediately familiar to you. It’s something that’s been on the cards for many years - perhaps ever since the railways, that are now being refurbished,

were taken up. There’s plenty to do and plenty that is still aspirational.

What goes around comes around, and this certainly applies to flywheels. The flywheels that David Shirres is referring to spin rather faster than many we’ve come across and they have the potential to either save fuel or increase the acceleration of DMUs or even both. His tale is also of the collaboration of three companies brought together as a result of a Knowledge Transfer Network.

It’s not strictly a railway, but it still has to satisfy the ROGS regs. It’s not really high speed, but it certainly carries a whole load of people. It doesn’t have vehicles that are coupled together, but there are an awful lot of them very close to each other. It’s the Heathrow pod system and David has been off to find there are many similarities to real railways nonetheless.

Has it ever struck you that overhead line electrification structures were ugly? It seems that many folks believe they are and have taken a real aversion to them. Odd really as they’re an excellent example of engineering simplicity - which is probably the nub of the problem! Step in the RIBA and a competition run to find something that is just as efficient but which is a little more attractive. Three entrants have made the grade - see what you think.

The Internet of Things is an interesting concept and a quirky name that was coined by a Brummy - Kevin Ashton - back in 1999. Now it has come to rail and our article this month endeavours to explain both the concept and its potential benefits.

And the next exhibition? It’s the (really) big InnoTrans in Berlin in September. See you there?

Exhibitions!Time for a brief pause...

EditorGrahame [email protected]

Production EditorNigel [email protected]

Production and designAdam O’[email protected]

Matthew [email protected]

Engineering [email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

AdvertisingAsif Ahmed | [email protected]

Chris Davies | [email protected]

Paul Curtis | [email protected]

the rail engineerRail Media House,

Samson Road, Coalville

Leicestershire, LE67 3FP.

Telephone: 01530 816 444

Fax: 01530 810 344

Email: [email protected]

Website: www.therailengineer.com

Editorial copyEmail: [email protected]

Free controlled circulationEmail: [email protected]

The small printthe rail engineer is published by

RailStaff Publications Limited and

printed by Pensord.

© All rights reserved. No part of this

magazine may be reproduced in any

form without the prior written

permission of the copyright owners.

Part of

Grahame Taylor

the rail engineer • July 2014 5

Page 6: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

NEWS

The National Certification Body (NCB) has won the contract to be the approval body for the new Loram Rail Grinders commissioned by Network Rail.

Loram, one of the leading suppliers of track maintenance machinery and services in North America, has been contracted to design, build and deliver three new Rail Grinders to Network Rail. Already working with UK based AEGIS, which manages the safety and engineering approvals process, Loram has now awarded NCB the contract to provide the independent vehicle conformance certification services.

Commissioning trials of the final train are planned for April 2017.

NCB to certify Lorams

After all the delays in confirming the order, Siemens are pressing on with development of the new trains. By April, the first 45 body

shells were complete and the first 12-car train was on test. Three cars were also in the Rail Tec Arsenal climate chamber in Vienna.

Tests focused on the Class 700’s ability to withstand the effects of extreme ambient temperatures, solar gain, ice, snow and wind. The complex series of tests examined interior components, such as air conditioning and heating, and exterior mounted components including couplers, doors and windscreen wipers.

Now, the first complete train has reached 100mph on the Siemens test track and the programme is on schedule to start services on Thameslink in early 2016. By the end of 2018, the Class 700s will run through central London every two-three minutes at the busiest times. This equates to 24 trains per hour in each direction through the central core.

100mph Thameslink

The new Siemens-built trains for Thameslink completed another phase of their testing recently as the first one hits 100mph on the Wildenrath test track.

www.moore-concrete.com

Bridge Deck Construction

Station PlatformsViaduct SlabsBespoke Units

STRUCTURAL PRECASTFOR RAILWAYS

MOORE CONCRETE PRODUCTS LTDCaherty House, 41 Woodside Rd,

Ballymena BT42 4QH N.I. T. 028 2565 2566F. 028 2565 8480 E. [email protected]

the rail engineer • July 20146

Page 7: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

OHSAS 18001Registered

Health & SafetyManagement

ISO 14001Registered

EnvironmentalManagement

ISO 9001Registered

QualityManagement

Signalling Installation

Signalling Design

Planning and Project Management

Testing & Commissioning

Location and REB construction in our fully equipped workshops

Health, Safety, Environment and Quality

PIONEERI’m part of a team who engineer rail solutions.

It’s not just about building train tracks. In helping to develop public transportation systems across the region, we’re building a more sustainable future, fuelling national economies and creating opportunities to commute, travel and adventure. Are you a pioneer, protector, adventurer, collaborator, creator? Join us in engineering a brighter future at CH2MHILL.jobs/RE

the rail engineer • July 2014 7

Page 8: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

This year’s IMechE Railway Challenge was held at Stapleford Miniature Railway at the end of June and was won by a team from new-entrants London Underground.

The Challenge, which is for students, apprentices and graduates, requires teams to design and build a 10.�⁄₄” gauge locomotive. These then compete against each other over a weekend by

endeavouring to complete a series of tests which cover such aspects as ride comfort, noise emissions, energy recovery, traction and reliability.

This year four teams took part,

two from the industry (London Underground and Interfleet) and two from Academia (the Universities of Huddersfield and Birmingham). No team had a trouble-free weekend, but the overall victor was TfL’s

London Underground team which was participating for the first time.

Congratulations to them, commiserations to the others, and a full report will appear in The Rail Engineer next month.

NEWS

National Express, operating as c2c, has retained the Essex Thameside franchise which operates between London and commuter hubs such as Barking, Basildon and Southend.

As part of its 15-year franchise commitment, the company will provide a fleet of 17 new four-car trains providing almost 4,800 extra seats. These new trains will run alongside the current fleet of 74 Class 357 trains built by Adtranz (now Bombardier) between 1999 and 2002.

In addition to the new trains, which will be introduced from

2019 onwards, a number of other improvements have been promised. These include over £30 million to be spent on upgrading stations, including Fenchurch Street and Barking, complete step-free access at all stations, free wi-fi on all trains and stations, and 25,000 additional morning peak-time seats for commuters.

New trains for c2c

London Underground wins challenge

the rail engineer • July 20148

Page 9: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

the rail engineer • July 2014 9

Page 10: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

This year’s IMechE Railway Challenge was held at Stapleford Miniature Railway at the end of June and was won by a team from new-entrants London Underground.

The Challenge, which is for students, apprentices and graduates, requires teams to design and build a 10.�⁄₄” gauge locomotive. These then compete against each other over a weekend by endeavouring to complete a series of tests which cover such aspects as ride comfort, noise emissions, energy recovery, traction and reliability.

This year four teams took part, two from the industry (London Underground and Interfleet) and two from Academia (the Universities of Huddersfield and Birmingham). No team had a trouble-free weekend, but the overall victor was TfL’s London Underground team which was participating for the first time.

Congratulations to them, commiserations to the others, and a full report will appear in The Rail Engineer next month.

NEWS

National Express, operating as c2c, has retained the Essex Thameside franchise which operates between London and commuter hubs such as Barking, Basildon and Southend.

As part of its 15-year franchise commitment, the company will provide a fleet of 17 new four-car trains providing almost 4,800 extra seats. These new trains will run alongside the current fleet of 74 Class 357 trains built by Adtranz (now Bombardier) between 1999 and 2002.

In addition to the new trains, which will be introduced from

2019 onwards, a number of other improvements have been promised. These include over £30 million to be spent on upgrading stations, including Fenchurch Street and Barking, complete step-free access at all stations, free wi-fi on all trains and stations, and 25,000 additional morning peak-time seats for commuters.

New trains for c2c

London Underground wins challenge

the rail engineer • July 201410

Page 11: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Changing how we plan and deliver safe work

The Planning and Delivering Safe Work programme will radically improve the way work sites are managed and risks controlled by:■ Improving our planning and risk assessment processes

and being clearer about safety leadership on site.

■ Providing greater clarity about the arrangements to manage both the operational railway and task risks.

Our aim is to ensure the industry has the right tools, roles and processes to support the Lifesaving Rule “Always have a valid safe system of work in place before going on or near the line.”

Come and see the Programme Team at the Planning and Delivery of Safe Work stand or email us at [email protected]

rail_live_ad PADSA.indd 1 03/06/2014 14:44

Page 12: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Rail Live 2014. An exhibition which does exactly what it says on the tin - it shows off railway engineering working in front of an audience, live. The first Rail Live took place on 18/19 June at Long Marston near Stratford-upon-Avon. Building on the success of last year’s National Track Plant Show, over 300 exhibitors gathered together to show off

their latest products, equipment and services to around 5,000 railway engineers from around the UK and abroad.

Getting readyIt was going to be three long days including the Tuesday

for build-up, although many of the organising team had been on-site for a lot longer than that. So a bit of preparation was necessary.

First of all - PPE. As this was going to be a working site, full PPE was mandatory. Although in possession of a full set, it was more suited to spending several hours on-track at midnight in the wind and the rain than three days of (hopefully) sunshine in a field in Warwickshire in high summer.

So some adjustments were made. Some good socks from Workforce turned out to be wonders - not so thick that they were too hot yet thick enough that there were no problems with sore feet for the whole show.

Four orange polo shirts from Safeaid’s Signal range were cool enough to not cause discomfort, while a hard hat from JSP was selected as it has a short peak and so wouldn’t get in the way of cameras and flash guns.

After adding all of these to the standard kit, it was off to Long Marston to make sure that everything was ready. On the Tuesday afternoon, the site was full of vehicles unloading everything from tents and generators to shiny new yellow machinery. Every exhibitor had to be self-sufficient so there were gazebos and marquees of all shapes and sizes springing up.

By 6pm there was some semblance of order about the place, and most would-be exhibitors knocked off for a

well-deserved burger and beer (or water) at the Network Rail-organised barbeque. After some entertainment from a band which featured Martin Arter, Network Rail Infrastructure Projects’ commercial director, on guitar (they were good too!), it was time for some awards. These were introduced by Steve Featherstone, track renewals director and the driving force behind the show.

Awards were presented to the best suppliers to Track Renewals and for the best stands - although how they had been judged during the organised chaos of build-up that afternoon was a puzzle. A suggestion that a half-finished award be presented for the best half-finished stand fell on deaf ears though.

NIGEL WORDSWORTH

RAILLive2014

RAILLive2014

RAIL2014

GUIDE

THE RAIL GUIDEOFFICIAL LiveIt did what it said on the tin

Martin Arter (left) and the Rail Live band.

the rail engineer • July 201412

Page 13: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Congratulations to all the winners, and to Amey, Colas, Babcock and Carillion who paid for the food.

By now dusk was falling and the wise went off to bed ready for a busy day tomorrow. The less fortunate went back to finish off building their stands, and Andy Reynolds enjoyed his birthday cake.

And they’re off!Wednesday was another fine day. By 8am busses full of

people in orange were already arriving at the site having come from the car park at the old airfield down the road. Coping with this unexpected rush, harassed–looking people from MacRail were scanning tickets for two lines of people while a third was reprinting them for those who had forgotten to bring them. After the initial rush, that area ran like clockwork for the whole show.

What a transformation awaited the new arrivals. The stands were all finished, vehicles had been cleared from the site (apart from a few shiny ones on display) and everything was ready for a 9:30 start.

To drag visitors through the site, the conference programme, which would run through both days, was at the far end of the showground. Despite that, the tent rapidly filled to hear Pete Waterman, music impresario, railway enthusiast and champion of youth training. He is also very involved in the rail industry. “I’m in Parliament at least 2 days a week now as one of my jobs as an ambassador for the Government,” he told his audience. “I represent Crewe, Cheshire and Warrington, Cheshire East and Cheshire West; I’m on the Government body for rail for the North West.

“So I spend a lot of time in Government and have done for over six or seven years and I can promise you there is a difference from when I first went to the House of Commons seven years ago - they understand … that if this country wants prosperity, if it wants jobs and it wants to go forward it has to invest in infrastructure, it’s not about anything else, it’s about infrastructure and if you don’t modernise it, if you don’t renew it then it doesn’t provide jobs and it doesn’t provide wealth. At last we’ve persuaded all parties to understand that’s exactly what the railway is about. And I am old enough to remember when the railway was a joke with politicians, they would have closed it as quickly as they could have done, now we’re opening it up faster than we ever closed it, which is great news.

“But to do this, to get this to work we need young people. We need young people from school, we need people that are only just going to junior school to understand that this is a career, this is a real good job, it’s a job for life, it’s a job that no longer is just about digging holes, it’s a job where you need specialities; you couldn’t be like me and leave school at 14 unable to read and write because you couldn’t work any of your computers, so we need to train our children and our young people differently.

“It’s an exciting world that we live in right now in the railways because for the first time we have a bright future, and that bright future is our next generation of people that we’ve got to train and bring in.”

Gareth Richardson of TXM Plant receives the Gold Award for Best in Show from Steve Featherstone with the rest of Network Rail’s team looking on.

Andy Reynold celebrated his birthday at the barbeque.

the rail engineer • July 2014 13

Page 14: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

The CP5 challengeLater that morning, Steve Featherstone took the stand.

He covered the challenges for track renewals over CP5 and his ten-point delivery plan. One of the stand-out comments he made was about value for money and the supply chain:

“I let the on-track plant contracts when I was maintenance director about seven years ago and we bought those based on price; whoever had the cheapest machines won the bid. And we took about 8% off the price of the machines and we patted ourselves on the back and said, didn’t we do a good job, we have screwed the supply chain on price.

“What that did was it commoditised the plant supply chain. Every shift of the weekend or every mobilisation at the weekend typically costs £250,000. We put a £250,000 delivery system at risk because we ‘nickel and dimed’ on a £500 piece of kit and if we’d maybe paid £550 for that piece of kit but it was better maintained, more reliable, it de-risks a £250,000 delivery system.

“We have got to start thinking about reliability in service, far more than we think about price, recognise that the supply chain, if they are going to give us reliability and service then actually we have to allow them to make a reasonable margin.”

Other speakers covered their elements of the CP5 challenge, and there was an underlying theme of the innovation that would be needed to deliver those plans to budget. David Clarke of Future Railways looked at enabling innovation, Saleem Mohammad previewed the National Electrification Programme and Simon Scott went through the development of Network Rail’s new product approval process.

On the second day, Mark Southwell covered the CP5 signalling programme, Steve Naybour gave details of the success of the Track Partnership between Balfour Beatty Rail and London Underground, and Robbie Burns gave an entertaining and unscripted update on Crossrail and the Great Western upgrades.

Government supportAlmost at the close of the show, just before Nick

Elliot talked about the importance of the Supply Chain, Secretary of State Patrick McLoughlin visited the show and spoke in the conference centre. He went over the investment that the Government was making in the railways, both by funding Network Rail through CP5 to the tune of £38 billion and also committing to HS2.

He was impressed by what he saw at Rail Live 2014. “We’re very lucky in the UK that we have so many world-class businesses in the rail industry. I’ve just seen some of the exhibition and I’m going to see more a little later on, but I want that industry to be able to benefit from our long-term sustained investment and that to be felt throughout the nation’s supply chain. For that to happen we want you to be able to recruit skilled people that you need, so we’ve built the Crossrail Tunnelling Academy and we’ll be building the new HS2 academy, the first new further education college for over 20 years to train the next generation of world-class engineers.

“A record investment is without a doubt a huge vote of confidence in the UK rail industry; it is important to invest in your track record - you’ve shown in CP4 and building Crossrail that together you can deliver major infrastructure projects on time and on budget and that’s what’s going to be so vital over the coming years

“While the economy is recovering from our financial crisis and years of borrowing beyond our needs, people still feel that the cost of their commute is going to be incredibly important to continue to be as efficient as possible, so that rail travel is affordable to the fair payer and is good value for the tax payer - that’s what we mean by ‘keeping innovation and improving partnership working’ so that planned improvement work can be undertaken more quickly, so that works are completed on time, every time and track is handed back more quickly without actually compromising safety at all.”

the rail engineer • July 201414

Page 15: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Electrification demonstrationAs well as a two-day conference programme, there were

demonstrations taking place around the site. Everything from piling to track welding could be seen on almost every corner.

One of the largest was an electrification demonstration from ABC (the Alstom/Babcock/Costain joint venture for electrification) and Network Rail’s Overhead Conditional Renewal (OCR) team. Each member of the demonstration team was dressed in arc-protection PPE supplied by PHS Besafe. PHS individually measured each of the ABC staff to ensure a comfortable and flexible fit and then they were all issued with baselayer long sleeved t-shirt and shorts and then lightweight orange trousers and an ABC branded orange jacket.

The first day’s demonstration began with the SB Rail piling Kirow using its hammer attachment to install two 610mm x 4 metre piles. Once those piles had been driven, 7.2 metre structures were lifted and fastened to them.

When that was completed, the Kirow travelled to a second location and repeated the process. Meanwhile, Innovative Railway Safety Ltd installed a length of magnetic safety barrier, segregating the spectators from the demonstration area.

Next, two OCR SRS road-rail lorries and an ABC MEWP accessed the track and proceeded to install the fixed termination brackets and four new series 2 cantilevers.

The second day began with the OCR wiring train pulling out contact and catenary wires under tension and clipped into the cantilevers while another team began installing the pre-fabricated droppers. Once the train reached the final structure, the wires were terminated to the fixed end self-supporting anchor (SSA). At the other end of the demo, another OCR team in an SRS attached the wires to the tensioners.

All in all, it as an impressive, real-time demonstration on how to electrify a railway.

SB Rail, which was part of that electrification demonstration, enjoyed a very successful two days in the sunshine. The live piling demonstration delivered with its uniquely designed and adapted Kirow KRC250, the only one of its kind currently available in the UK, was a tremendous success and generated a real buzz around the show ground. This very special event enabled SB Rail to demonstrate its capability and efficiency in the safe delivery of piling and mast erection work in a way that would not normally be so accessible to so many people.

The World CupEngland’s performance in Brazil is probably best left

unmentioned. However, Rail Live exhibitors and guests got into the spirit of the event at a Word Cup Dinner that was held at Stratford’s Holiday Inn on the Wednesday evening. The biggest dinner ever held at that venue, it raised £2500 for Railway Children and was enjoyed by all who attended.

Congratulations to Shannon Rail for sponsoring the event and to Ruth and her team for their hard work in organising it.

Some of the Rail Media team at RAIL Live 2014.

the rail engineer • July 2014 15

Page 16: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

300 things to see But, of course, the heart of the show was the three

hundred exhibitors who had come to connect with their colleagues and customers. The range of products and services on show was matched almost by the varieties of tents, marquees, gazebos and mobile display units (caravans) that were packed into a seemingly-too-small 150 acres of Warwickshire.

Rail Media was handily placed in the centre. Editors Grahame Taylor of The Rail Engineer and Andy Milne of RailStaff both attended, and the entire events, marketing and sales team was on hand to meet industry contacts.

But that was just one of a host of exhibitors, and all seemed enthusiastic about the show and their presence.

Astra Rail, for example, was thrilled to be a part of Rail Live 2014. Having been the key supplier of attachments to

TXM (which incidentally won the best show stand award at the barbeque) for over 12 months, Astra’s involvement in the rail industry is growing. There is a strong belief in working with customers to provide solutions (in the form of excavator attachments) for a wide range of applications and Rail Live gave the company the perfect platform in which to exhibit some of the latest additions to its hire fleet.

Cembre was another award winner from the previous evening having received the Best Innovation - Small Plant award for its Robokatta Automatic Rail Disc Saw. Mark Lewis commented: “The recognition is both encouraging and appreciated, particularly for our hard working design engineers who are trying to ensure there is a safer and healthier environment whilst working track side.” Robokatta certainly attracted a lot of attention on Cembre’s stand.

The VP Group had a joint stand with around seven group companies on display. One was Groundforce which took the opportunity to showcase a wide range of

products and services to a niche and engaging audience. Apologies were due to neighbouring stands for the loud bangs - they were in fact due to demonstrations that involved small footballs vibrating up the hose of U Mole’s Vacuum Excavation rig, with the extreme power causing them to burst. The team thought that it was refreshing to be at an event that is focused on hands-on demonstrating.

Hire Station was another VP company on show, supported by Nightsearcher which demonstrated a range of LED lighting, both 110V and battery operated. Makita also joined in with new 4-stroke petrol cut off and battery operated strimmers together with a range of cordless tools.

New products aboundDatum Geotechnical and Structural Monitoring

took advantage of the warm weather to show off RailTempMATE. This innovative solution to the problem of Critical Rail Temperature (CRT) monitoring was a popular attraction throughout both days, generating high levels of interest. The positive feedback that Datum received from everyone involved with CRT confirmed the company’s belief that RailtempMATE is the ideal product for effective CRT monitoring. “Meeting with many knowledgeable people from across the rail industry and helping to build a world-class railway is what this event is all about,” a stand member commented afterwards. “We are proud to have supported Rail Live 2014 and our thoughts have already turned to addressing the new challenges we heard about during an excellent two days.”

RVT Rentavent demonstrated its solution to the many noise issues contractors are facing during piling works on their electrification works with the launch of a new product. With a lot of interaction over 2 days, noise challenges within the industry were discussed. Solutions to some of these are already available, and the company will be making further developments following the valuable feedback from customers at the show.

Bridgeway Consulting attended this type of show for the first time and thoroughly enjoyed it! The team met both old and new contacts at the event and made some links

Charlotte Evans of Astra Site Services on Trac Engineering’s climbing wall.

the rail engineer • July 201416

Page 17: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

ww

w.railtem

pm

ate.com

Network Rail ProductApproval Number: PA05/05507

Available for sale or hireNext day delivery +44 (0)161 797 5511

Immediate and continuous accessto critical rail temperature data

• Removes the need for manual, on-track measurements• Optimises resource management• Reliability, accuracy and repeatability• Rapid response to changeable weather systems• Innovative and state-of-the-art in built communications platform

Is your track smart?Critical Rail Temperature Monitoring

RailtempMATE A4 Advert (7).pdf 1 30/05/2014 16:21

Page 18: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

they felt could have great value. Next time, they will bring some larger equipment with them to take advantage of the space available at Rail Live.

QTS, which features on this month’s cover, believe that Rail Live 2014 was a great success. The team endeavoured to show off its most impressive plant fleet and managed to showcase some of its most unique aspects.

PPEAs if having everyone in orange suits wasn’t enough

(as well as some yellow and a few pieces of dirty brown!), several PPE manufacturers and suppliers took the opportunity to show off the depth of their ranges and highlight some new products.

Safeaid felt that Rail Live was a resounding success. As a company, they do a lot of exhibitions each year but none of them offer the unique opportunity to see the products they sell being worn and in use in a real rail environment. They found it very beneficial to showcase the broad range of PPE and track safety solutions they offer and felt that the interest they had was outstanding.

Clad Safety had a very busy stand with many new enquiries for rail workwear and PPE. Of particular interest were several new products including the Protal 5 Inherent FR/AS Boilersuit to GO/RT specification, ideal for track welding and grinding, Elka Rainwear waterproof bib & brace, Lavoro Exploration waterproof boots and X2 blue tinted wraparound safety spectacles.

Gore was there, and had a good level of quality visitors from Network Rail and contractors alike.

Bodyguard had a ‘shoot to score’ football competition going on its stand. Visitors were encouraged to contribute 50p per shot to Railway Children, as well as to look at the company’s new products.

Another charity - CLIC Sargent - was the recipient of special recognition when Colas Rail’s newly-refurbished Class 60 was named after the charity which is Network Rail’s charity of choice this year. A further surprise was an ‘interim’ payment of £15,000.

All exhibitors were asked to contribute to a central fund which will then be split between CLIC Sargent, Railway Children and St Johns which was supplying medical cover for the event. CLIC Sargent’s share of the final ‘pot’ should be more than the £15,000 handed over by Steve Featherstone on the day.

While on the subject of locomotives, there was a slightly-grubby Direct Rail Services locomotive on site with a Network Rail inspection train. As that company has at least one shiny new Class 68 in the country, why didn’t they take the opportunity to show it off? Colas Rail had a Class 70 on display - so new the paint still looked wet!

NewcomersFibrelite had its first experience of the rail industry at

Infrarail, held at Earls Court in May. At Rail Live, it was their objective to demonstrate the many benefits of using GRP composite access covers as opposed to the traditionally used heavy (and slippy) metal and concrete. The open spaces of Rail Live, and the hands-on approach, gave them the opportunity to do just that.

E-T-A, manufacturers of circuit breakers for on-board power supplies on rail vehicles, was another company having a new experience. However, the friendly atmosphere helped and the team booked some quality appointments to be followed up afterwards.

Force One intentionally set its stand out to not only show their normal road suction vehicles but also the auxiliary and specialist equipment that allows for working in rail environments. Visitors were most interested in the new Brokk hybrid vehicle, a blend of suction/vacuum

the rail engineer • July 201418

Page 19: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Proud Contributors to Rail Live 2014

C

M

Y

CM

MY

CY

CMY

K

Page 20: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

power and excavation power. Being able to demonstrate this vehicle excavating and using its suction power to move material through its intake hoses back to one of their suction vehicles over 20 metres away resulted in a number of project orders being confirmed during the show.

In addition, the Force One team walked around the show talking with other exhibitors and picked up other leads that way. As always at rail shows, there was as much activity between exhibiting companies as there was with the visitors!

Even the show’s insurer got in on the act. Specialist brokers Jobson James Rail and the insurer’s underwriter from rail specialist Newline were very impressed with the whole show. “Where else could I have met an owner of one our leading RRV Plant companies for a mutually beneficial conversation while we both sat in the sun relaxed enjoying our lunch?” joked Keven Parker afterwards.

Experienced playersThe Pandrol Group stand was another with multiple

exhibitors, in this case Pandrol UK, Railtech UK, Rosenqvist and Vortok, each promoting their own but related rail products.

A range of the current and new Pandrol rail fastenings were exhibited on short track panels, showing the now familiar FASTCLIP system for main line railways, the new ‘FE’ system recently adopted by London Underground, the range of existing and forthcoming ‘Re’ clips and the novel curved and composite pads. Additionally two of the new systems for concrete slab track were exhibited being the ‘FCA’ and ‘VIPA-DFC’ systems for mounting on concrete blocks or sleepers.

Railtech UK exhibited their range of alumino-thermic welding portions and accessories together with the Matweld rail cutting and grinding equipment. Indeed, Network Rail used a Twin Pack Unit and profile grinder for profiling the flash butt welds during their demonstrations.

Rosenqvist also assisted Network Rail staff during the demonstrations, this time of the high speed rail clipping machine CD500 as part of the stressing and welding

demonstrations on track. This demonstration was repeated frequently over the two days of the exhibitions and generated big audiences for the high output process. Kieron Loy commented afterwards: “From the emails we have received since the show there is no doubt that the CD500 demo was a resounding hit.”

Vortok International was exhibiting the range of track accessories such as Vortok stressing rollers, safety barriers, temporary speed limit signs and balise fastenings complete with novel small detection magnets for signalling circuits.

Story Contracting, which only visited the National Track

Plant Show last year, was glad they had taken the decision to exhibit this time. As a spokesman said afterwards: “After a busy few weeks preparing for Rail Live 2014 it was great to finally be there at the event networking with our colleagues in the industry. We were thrilled at the overall feeling of positivity that is out there in the industry at the moment and the interest we received in our capabilities, machinery and the Story team was fantastic.

Pure poetrySome exhibitors were so pleased with Rail Live 2014 they were moved to verse:Rail Live was a truly impressive event

Exhibits large and small to try and circumvent

Demonstrations, networking and lots of chat

Orange high vis head to toe plus safety hat

Two days of activity with lots to learn and see

From signals, track, suppliers and health & safety

Including embankment access with a modular kit

The concrete stairway system is so cheap and quick

Celebrated as UK’s largest outdoor rail event

Thank you Network Rail for all those long hours spent

Ensuring an inspiring and operational scene

Looking forward to the next one in 2016

Jeanette EdwardsStanton Bonna Concrete

the rail engineer • July 201420

Page 21: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Not only was the weather fine, but the overall atmosphere when walking the vast stretches of the exhibition was brilliant. This was a really worthwhile event for us and being awarded with two Golden RRV Awards for ‘Most Improved’ and ‘Best Operator’ was the icing on the cake!”

Network Rail’s own displaysNetwork Rail was present in force, naturally. Several

sections, departments and organisations made an appearance. Most just tried to call themselves ‘Network Rail’, confusingly, but the Rail Live organisers made a valiant attempt to identify them all separately.

The National Certification Body (NCB) was one such. Engineers met with plant manufacturers and operators from the UK and Europe as well as freight operators during the exhibition. Judging by the prospective enquiries discussed, there certainly seems to be a need for NCB’s new approach for conformity assessment services and NCB are more than happy to help - whether it is rail vehicle, on-track plant and machinery, services for freight operators or infrastructure projects, NCB can offer an appropriate, value for money solution which meets safety regulations in all of these areas.

The IP Signalling Innovation Group’s (SIG) Play Pen proved immensely popular with visitors giving them the opportunity to ‘kick the tyres’ of a variety of products and solutions for rail projects. Some were old, some were new and some just ideas being floated for feedback, but all could add value if taken on board. Ranging from lightweight cable route solutions through to the use of PLCs for level crossing control no material or technology was off limits - the team even gave away Blackpool Rock in the shape of Aluminium power cable!

The Planning and Delivering Safe Work Programme team had a busy two days at Rail Live explaining the purpose of the programme and the forthcoming “Safety Changes” that will ultimately touch everyone that works on the railway infrastructure. They wanted to make sure that we spoke to as many people across the business as possible in an effort to explain the three key elements of the programme and alleviate any concerns that people have.

Network Rail’s Infrastructure Reliability Team showcased a number of new techniques and technologies that it has developed in order to improve the reliability of the railway infrastructure. S&C best practice was demonstrated live alongside displays of location case cooling, treadles, relays and track technologies. Rail Live provided a unique opportunity to share the team’s knowledge with the rest of the rail industry, and there was good engagement with manufacturers, suppliers, other Network Rail teams and even staff from the ORR. Having a complete S&C within a marquee certainly proved to be a unique attraction!

Interesting displaysHarting UK took advantage of the SIG’s focus on Plug

and Play, the introduction of Class 2 and the need for ever faster data rates at the show to demonstrate some of its latest innovations. Of particular interest were glass fibre reinforced polyamide Han Eco hoods and housings for use in Class 2 applications, a single cable Cat 7 inter-car jumper assembly and Harting’s highly flexible range of modular connectivity.

Klingspoor Abrasives was another exhibitor demonstrating its products. The market leaders in abrasive rail cutting-off wheels held live demonstrations of some of their new products at the show and are now looking forward to exploring several new applications in which visitors expressed an interest.

Geotechnical Engineering attended Rail Live to demonstrate its innovative slope climbing rigs and collaborative methods for working when delivering site investigation services. The team found the event was a fantastic networking opportunity, highlighting the potential of how many new projects are available in relation to CP5. Indeed, one team member enthused that “Rail Live is one of the best shows we’ve ever attended!”

The Inside Out Group was one of several companies who not only exhibited but also assisted the show organisers. The group, consisting of Inside Out Technical Security and Inside Out Time Lapse Productions, is relatively new to the rail industry, and the event enabled them to share their film production portfolio and enhance their network across

the rail engineer • July 2014 21

Page 22: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

the UK. In addition, a film crew covered the event and Inside Out will be issuing a film production of the 2014 show later in the year. The team loved the opportunity to capture footage from Network Rail’s helicopter and is looking forward to including this within the film.

Hot and sunny - but beware of waterPerhaps not surprising after the wet start to the year,

drainage and water-related exhibits were a string feature of the show.

Demco felt that the strength of the show was the visitor profile, people connected with the rail industry, who were keen to share experiences and had a genuine interest in track drainage pipework. “As a manufacturer we welcomed this show and in my experience it was quite unique in its scale and focus,” national business development manager Peter Harris commented.

OnSite delivers drainage maintenance services and portable temporary dam solutions. While these are not as high profile as the vast array of rail mounted plant and equipment on display at Rail Live 2014, the company welcomed a large number of practical and interested operational customers to the stand.

“As this event is overwhelmingly attended by rail professionals, who know what they want, we had no tyre-kickers; just serious people making a serious investigation of how we might help to solve their railway drainage problems.” That was the view of Max Reynolds, chief operating officer of Complete Drain Clearance. As well as obtaining some very promising customer leads, the company is exploring partnerships with complementary service providers so that it can offer a more comprehensive end-to-end service for drainage and culvert clearance, relining and reinstatement.

Technological advancesInnovation was a common theme around the show, with

Future Railway hosting exhibits in conjunction with the Rail Alliance.

Exhibitors helped each other out. One brought along an old Blackpool tram to show off a new drive system. However, they found that they had no way of getting visitors up into the tram itself as there was no platform. Step forward Martin Brooke from Bratts Ladders with a solution. Well done, Sir!

H2gogo found that being part of the Rail Alliance and Future Railways ‘consortium’ proved to be a fantastic opportunity to launch a new mobile hydrogen product range. They also verified their emissions reduction and engine carbon cleaning technology with impromptu live demonstrations on other stands, such as a Volvo 9 litre truck on the LCM stand, a Land Rover on the AM-UAS stand and the ice cream van by the entrance to the exhibition!

York EMC Services were also located in the Rail Alliance area and had a live electromagnetic compatibility emissions demo going on outside behind the marquee. Steve Seller, technical manager at York EMC’s Castleford laboratory near Leeds, had three antennas hooked up to an EMC survey test system. Visitors were able to see not just background signals (ambients) but also some real live emissions as rolling stock demonstrations went past on the nearby track.

Manta Rail Services had an eye-catching display with a mock tunnel portal. These were used to show off Manta’s range of mobile tunnel ventilation fans and the whole stand justifiably came in for a lot of attention.

Husqvarna displayed the K 1260 Rail Saw, which is one of the most powerful and lightest rail saws on the market. The included attachment RA10 was also shown which provides fast and stable mounting of the saw to the rail track ensuring a perfect right-angle cut. FR 3 blades were also exhibited. Due to its versatility these blades are ideal for the rail industry as they can be used for cutting wooden railway sleepers as well as alloy conductor rails. These blades can also cut through many other materials with ease including lightweight steel, PVC, ductile iron, fibre glass, wood, bricks, rebar and masonry materials.

Motor vehiclesDawson Rentals was a good example of one of the

more unlikely exhibitors at the show. Showing off a range of road vehicles rather than rail plant, nevertheless the company received a lot of interest for its more specialised vehicles such as 5, 6, 9 and full welfare specification. Pleasingly, visitors also discussed the standard product range of cars, vans, pick-ups and 4X4s where time-critical and safety-conscious solutions are of paramount importance. The ability to meet in a forum of likeminded individuals proved to be invaluable and a number of positive steps and meetings took place around future business requirements and vehicle standards.

South Cave Tractors also had vehicles on its stand - Unimogs. To be precise, three of the very latest and environmentally efficient Euro 6 Mercedes Benz Unimogs including the Zagro Rail equipped U423 Road-Rail

the rail engineer • July 201422

Page 23: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

A4 AD LAYOUT:Layout 1 15/5/14 14:04 Page 1

Page 24: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

shunter shipped over from Germany especially for the event. Enquiries came from many organisations and departments all looking for solutions on-rail, off-rail, under-ground and over, for shunters, working platforms, tool carriers and rescue vehicles. Now the follow-up work begins, but South Cave Tractors couldn’t be happier!

Aquarius asked visitors “What do you see? Is it what Aquarius customers see?” and got an excellent response. Specialising in small RRVs Aquarius’ stand illustrated the sheer variety of uses for their nimble R2R 4x4s (Road 2 Rail Land Rovers) and Rail Mules, from the expected traditional personnel and equipment carrying to the innovative scanning now offered in collaboration with Cat Surveys and Topcon. This captures 360 degree images and point cloud measurements that are stitched together to form a 3D image which can be accessed on-site from a PC, phone or tablet.

Visitors were surprised to see how much can be transported with a R2R 4x4 including a full BV1000 kit, all of which is stored on the vehicle, reducing manual handling (and thereby improving health and safety) and

increasing productivity by avoiding trolley pushes. The various trailers on display demonstrated the payload that now can be achieved when used with a R2R 4x4.

Providing a VIP Road2Rail 4x4 vehicle to transport Pete Waterman from the station to the show topped off what was a fantastic event for the Aquarius team!

More to seeQuattro Group brought Dumbo to the

show. No - not the cartoon elephant, although it was a graphic on the side of the Vroom suction excavator

that gave rise to the name. The track gave the young pachyderm a perfect location to perform small on-track demonstrations, something Rail Live provides that no other exhibition can match.

Rail Products UK introduced the new ART 17T MEWP to the industry at Rail Live. 2014 has been an immediate success for Rail Products with Readypower ordering the first 20 machines. Derek Burns, managing director, was impressed by the outstanding organisation of the Event, the quality of the visitors and the total enthusiasm of all participants.

Capel Group is a specialist vegetation company that are capable of delivering projects from start to finish. It owns its own road-rail vehicles that have been specially designed to go on the track to help to make Network Rail a more mechanised environment. The two days of Rail Live gave Capel a chance to meet people from all over the rail network and let them know what machinery is available to keep the railways clear.

Alert5® was delighted to be invited to attend the 2014 Rail Live event, as it was a valuable opportunity to meet with vast numbers of influential decision makers in the industry, particularly within Network Rail. The Alert5 app was well received, generating many positive comments regarding its user-friendly interface and the fact that the app notifies up to five phone contacts in the event of an emergency. It was reassuring to see how committed the industry is to the health and safety of railway operatives.

The Nationwide Federation of Plant Equipment Operators (NFPEO) chose Rail Live as their launch event and it provided a great opportunity to create awareness of the Federation’s key objectives. Recent research carried out amongst members has identified ‘Training’ (beyond blue), ‘On-site Safety’ and a ‘Consistent rate of pay’ as important points that operators want the NFPEO to address in the near future. Therefore, the Federation

the rail engineer • July 201424

Page 25: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

found it especially pleasing to receive positive feedback and support on these points from a stream of visitors as well as fellow exhibitors.

Huge varietyLatchways, the leading manufacturer of fall protection

systems, were exhibiting its complete range of products for working at height activities in the rail industry. Products included ManSafe® cable systems for personal fall arrest on ladders & monopoles, the ManSafe SRL for use on overhead systems in fleet depots and the Latchways Personal Rescue Device®, for challenging access duties associated with track gantries, signalling equipment and overhead cable installation and maintenance.

Horizon Utility Supplies was well supported by its suppliers, Klauke GmbH whose range of cutting and crimping tools were well received. Connector Products Inc. where the demonstrations of shear-type wedge connectors proved a great focal point and YDS/Goliath whose specialist footwear raised many enquiries.

Omnicom had a very busy couple of days. Stand staff received lots of great feedback and suggestions for Track Locator and the augmented reality app and Google Glass which are currently in the development stages. They also came away with some very valuable leads for future surveys of the network.

Complete Composite Systems debuted at this year’s RailLive, introducing for the first time their ground-mounted polypropylene cable troughing. Lightweight and structurally superior, CCS’ TerraSystem was roundly

welcomed, as was their highly competitive, elevated composite trough, the ArcoSystem, which offers rapid, low cost installation, supported at six metre centres. CCS’ cable management systems were complemented by their range of composite access engineering, fences, bridge structures, decking, houses and the exclusive rail clamp system for track crossings for which the reaction was remarkably positive.

Anderton Concrete, another troughing manufacturer, used the exhibition to launch its Anderlite and Anderlite 500 ranges. The two systems reduce the weight of traditional troughing whilst still keeping the typical characteristics and integrity users have come to expect from proven cementitious technology. Anderton also launched Ander-Clip and Ander-Fin, both systems have been designed to alleviate lineside cable theft.

Talking of which, Remsdaq experienced much interest from both Network Rail and contractors in its new covert cable theft detection system. The system uses a covert fibre optic cable and analysers using digital signal processing to provide an early warning of attempts to steal cable from the Network Rail estate.

Gray Campling was another company to benefit from an interest from fellow exhibitors. Paint sprayers is a niche market, but Gray Campling picked up a number of leads from within the show as well as from visitors.

Enthusiastic visitorsClarity Visual Management observed more enthusiasm

than ever for visual management as there is currently such a strong emphasis on performance improvement. Visitors showed particular interest in visual management boards - a very simple and clear method of monitoring and tracking key measures effectively, thereby increasing awareness and accountability.

Ballast Tools just used the show to meet customers old and new. Dinesh Patel reported that it was great to meet and shake hands with engineers and end-users with whom they normally just speak with on the phone.

Alan Dick Communications chose Rail Live to stage its first exhibition specifically aimed at the rail industry. The show provided a great opportunity for exhibitors to demonstrate their products and services in a way that an indoor event could never do. It gave the company the perfect platform to present its Rapid Repeater solution for RF in-fills and,

the rail engineer • July 2014 25

Page 26: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

as part of the exhibit, the training team demonstrated the process of Arc fusion splicing using rail specification optical fibre cable. This practical demonstration proved very popular amongst rail management professionals helping them to appreciate the processes involved by ‘de-mystifying’ optical communications within rail.

The innovative display by Liniar created quite a stir, with the firms lead-free, UK manufactured and eco-friendly track-side refuge on permanent display at the Long Marston site. Enquiries came thick and fast from contractors wanting reassurance that the PVCu product really is as lightweight to handle as it appears - and that it can be carried easily to site. Liniar was able to demonstrate the strength of its plastic log effect piling system, a real alternative to concrete or timber, and has already sent out many samples following the exhibition.

‘Smile if you got lucky last night’ was was just one of the examples of stickers printed up for visitors by KROY Europe. It was demonstration after demonstration on this busy stand. Now, Martin and James can’t wait to visit all the depots to see the signage that’s been produced by the staff, and if that sample is anything to go by the selection could be quite varied!

Siemens Rail Electrification brought its CUBE to Rail Live in June. Siemens RE shared its exhibition plot with the Rail Electrification Delivery Group (REDG) which is formed of Network Rail, RIA and the wider rail electrification supply chain and in which Siemens RE is an active member. The REDG team steering group works on a collaborative approach in delivery of the £4 billion electrification work bank with member companies undertaking responsibilities in areas such as planning, resources, materials, plant and standards.

The Siemens and REDG exhibition area was visited by a large number of Network Rail employees and delivery organisations over the two days. REDG showcased the annual linesman event - a competition sponsored by REDG to seek out the best OLE engineers in the business.

Is your Insurance Renewal Date in the next 3-6 months?

Plan early and call Keven Parker on

07816 283949 / 0121 452 8717 / 0207 983 9039

or email [email protected]

Offices in London and Birmingham. Nationwide coverage.

www.jobson-james.co.uk/rail

• Specialist rail knowledge

• Risk management orientated approach

• Resulting in lower insurance premiums

• Better technical advice

• We are passionate about rail!

WHY US?

• RRV and Plant companies

• S&T, PWay, IRSE and Civils contractors

• Rolling Stock Turnkey Modifications companies

• Manufacturers of rail related products

• ROSCOs

WE INSURE

Registered

Permanent WayInstitution

the rail engineer • July 201426

Page 27: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Ministerial trap?Safety Gravel was another surprising exhibit at the

show. Different colour gravels used to mark out areas of a worksite - it makes sense. However, they had one disappointment. “The Secretary of State walked up to and past the floor display and didn’t trip on the gravel. I had my iPad ready - now that would have been a picture but I suppose it proved the product that he didn’t.”

As a new supplier to the UK rail industry, Utility Equipment found the show an excellent way to meet new contacts and demonstrate its proven ability to solve work at height challenges for the rail industry in Europe.

The 4’AXE OHLE maintenance MEWP was a hit, with visitors surprised at the capability of such a compact and easily transportable machine. Another surprise was just how many wheels it has - 12 (four rail, four road and four off-road).

Continuing the theme of live demonstration, by mounting a fully functioning compact switch machine onto a switch provided by KGJ Price, Friedrich Hippe GmbH were able to demonstrate all the advantages of the WH point machines in a working environment. Visitors appreciated how easy it was to install between the rails, the self-locking facility and the trailability of the unit. Depots, industrial and heritage rail operators were also attracted to the quality of the Price trackwork, the plastic sleepers on which it was mounted and the Pintsch Tiefenbach control system.

All engineering projects rely on good drawings, and A-Tec Dos/Entwistle were on hand to show off wide-format printers, scanners and plan folders. Watching the Rigoli fold a five metre wide track drawing was an experience and, despite the sun, waterproof tear-proof films as an alternative to paper drawings have an obvious attraction.

A lot of engineers were clutching iPads on site. Peli Products were showing off protective vaults which keep dust and rain out of the works, keeping valuable data safe and allowing for the devices to be used in poor weather. They work too - the editorial iPad Air is safely housed in one of them!

the rail engineer • July 2014 27

Page 28: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

ISeeU Global is a company very new to rail which is learning all the time. They found everyone willing to help them make connections, and set them straight on some of the terminology (who would have thought railway lines are called roads?). They made some good contacts and several very good leads, especially around Fatigue Management, Lone Working and Incident Reporting.

The Plastic Piling Company took the opportunity to displace a few myths about plastic sheet piling, particularly the fact that they can be driven effectively

using conventional pile driving equipment. The idea of combining plastic piling with timber posts, steel tubes and even concrete was well received, with this extending sheet piling into king posts and formwork.

The Kent Group was another first time exhibitor. The electrical, mechanical and civil engineering company , which also specialises in fire protection and steel fabrication, had a lot of interest. “The benefit of having all the industry in one place is immense,” commented Ian Kent. “What an event! The summer weather was superb and the size of the event was staggering. The Organisers should be congratulated and the money raised for Charity is superb.”

Looking backSo that was Rail Live 2014. The weather was good,

the exhibitors were numerous, the demonstrations were awesome, the speakers were interesting and the crowds were made welcome. The food, provided by Network Rail’s Westwood training centre, was good too although busy editors didn’t get much time for it. Lunch on Wednesday was one of Colas Rail’s very welcome ice creams, and on Thursday it was a chocolate donut from Van Elle (thanks Ronnie!).

Congratulations to the team from Network Rail, Rail Alliance, Rail Media, and MacRail who put the whole show together – it was a job well done. A lot of hard work had been put into preparing the site by teams from Motorail and Quinton Rail Technology Centre, so well done to them as well.

Steve Featherstone was understandably happy. “Rail Live 2014 was a fantastic event. We think that we had half a billion pounds’ worth of equipment on display. Unless anybody knows otherwise, we think that Rail Live was the largest rail event in the world where you can actually see so much of the equipment being used live.

“Standing back and looking at the event, it spoke volumes about an industry and a supply chain that has a confidence in its future and is prepared to innovate to continuously improve the services that we deliver and the way that we deliver them.

“The intention was to bring the people with problems and the people with solutions together. I think that we achieved this on a massive scale.”

HUSQVARNA CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS UKTel: 0844 844 4570 - Web: www.husqvarnacp.co.uk

Email: [email protected] © 2014 Husqvarna AB (publ). All rights reserved.

THE HUSQVARNA K 1260 RAIL SAWOne of the market’s most powerful rail cutters. Scan the QR code or visit husqvarnacp.co.uk to explore all the features of the K 1260 Rail Saw.

the rail engineer • July 201428

Page 29: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Wire rope. It’s one of the forgotten elements of railway engineering which is actually indispensible. You might think it to be in the

same league as cable ties, duct tape and silicone sealant.

Actually, it is arguably more important than those. It can take a load, it needs to be tested and certified, and it has a finite life.

With all the work being carried out on the railways, as well as increased freight movements, demand for wire rope of all types is increasing. To keep up with this, Arbil Rail has expanded its wire rope press facility to include five machines, with the latest machine having a capacity of up to 1,000 tonnes.

Versatile capacityThis allows the industry-leading rail product solutions

provider to manufacture wire rope up to 52mm in diameter. In addition, using a range of machines varying in capacity from 150 tonnes to 1,000 tonnes, Arbil has both the facilities and capacity to produce large orders and to turn these around quickly.

Dave Nicholls, Arbil’s general manager, explained: “Wire rope production has been one of the cores of the business since its establishment in 1963, so investment in both equipment and man hours in this area is always of paramount importance to us. With a customer base spanning the whole of the UK, it is vital for us to be able to keep up with demand and our five recently-refurbished presses allow us to do just that.

“As we have a number of staff specialising in wire rope production, we are able to quickly turn around orders and we can make these bespoke to the customer requirements, whether it be unusually sized loops and aluminium ferrule eyes or extremely short or particularly long lengths of rope. All of our wire rope production is to the ISO 9001 standard.”

Additional accreditationThis enhancement of its abilities in wire rope production

is only one of Arbil’s recent initiatives. The company now boasts three accredited Permaquip service centres - at Stourbridge, Coventry and Bristol.

Permaquip has over 50 years of history in the design and manufacture of innovative rail maintenance equipment, so any service centre provider had to have the same ethos in quality, industry knowledge and customer service as its own. Marcus Taylor, commercial sales and service manager at Arbil, commented: “We have been stocking and supplying Permaquip products and offering a service solution for a number of years now. This familiarity with the products and our own longstanding within the rail industry stood us in good stead to be awarded the accreditation.”

This longstanding relationship between the two, along with Arbil’s over 50 year’s experience in both rail service and sales, were key contributors to the accreditation award. Jeremy Gamble, Permaquip’s managing director, added: “We have always been impressed by Arbil’s substantial and sophisticated range of testing equipment, which is unrivalled by most others in the industry. Each piece of equipment that enters Arbil’s service department is taken through a rigorous procedure of complete strip down, chemical clean, repair, re-spray, test and certification, all in accordance with ISO 9001, matching our own accreditation standards.

“The multiple accredited centres that Arbil provides ensure quick lead times whilst also maintaining the highest standards. As Arbil is also the manufacturer of the Zwicky™ line of track jacks, we know they share our passions about the importance of only using genuine parts when servicing and repairing.”

Wireropes servicingand

the rail engineer • July 2014 29

Page 30: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Technology transferGRAHAME TAYLOR

Long before arriving on site at Rail Live it was pretty apparent that the show was going to be large. Parking this year was not just round the corner in

a spare part of the Long Marston complex, it was at a nearby disused airfield. Built in 1939, it last saw service in the mid 50s, but now hosts a multitude of motorsport activities - including kennelling up the attendees of Rail Live for a couple of days.

By 11am on the first day it seemed that all the space had been taken with hordes making their way to the fleet of rather smart executive coaches for the short journey to the railway event.

Visible?So, apart from the rows of large yellow machines both

on and off track and the rows and rows of exhibitors’ stands, what was the initial overall impression of Rail Live? Well, in a word - or rather, in a colour - it was ‘Orange’. Yes, Rail Live was orange. Everyone kitted up from tip to toe in bright orange clobber - and as a result completely

invisible. That is apart from a couple of guys from the Far East who arrived in their version of HV clothing which was more of a bright green. As a result, they were they only people who were visible.

An editor’s thoughts on Rail Live 2014

the rail engineer • July 201430

Page 31: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Need Temporary Access?The UK’s Only Flat Pack Bridge Provider

0800 169 5269www.groundforcebridge.co.uk

youtube.com/vpgroundforce

WATCH A BRIDGE INSTALLATIONNeed Temporary Access?

The UK’s Only Flat Pack Bridge Provider

0800 169 5269www.groundforcebridge.co.uk

youtube.com/vpgroundforce

WATCH A BRIDGE INSTALLATION

Contact us today for aFREE site survey & quote.

Groundforce Bridge is the UK’S only flat pack bridge provider, currently providing the rail industry with a range of easily installed heavy duty temporary bridges.

Railways are specialAs usual in this editor’s choice article, we look not at the

larger exhibitors nor at those who come to these sorts of events every year. Instead we’ve checked out a few firms who have never been to a rail exhibition before and, in many cases, have never been near a railway site in their lives. These are the companies who have by lucky chance or by shrewd commercial judgement realised that there is a market for their products and expertise in an industry that seemed forever closed to them. They’ve heard the

message that “There’s nothing special or different about the railways. It’s just the same as any other.” And that “The railways just make things special”.

In fact, despite being a good slogan and a good way of attracting companies, it’s pretty close to being complete rubbish, but that’s just a personal opinion. The railways are special and they are different.

What industry in the twenty-first century propels hundreds of tons of unprotected machinery through the countryside at 125mph, restrained by barely a couple

the rail engineer • July 2014 31

Page 32: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

of inches of steel with practically no brakes and with no means of taking avoiding action? And what industry would then actively encourage people to climb inside, sit and walk about completely untethered inside these lumps of machinery?

Coupled with an extraordinary level of public scrutiny, of course the railways are different. But nevertheless this shouldn’t be the obstacle to new companies who wonder if their products could ever transfer over. Here are a few of the brave that have achieved just that:

Speckle patternsA stand which announced covert surveillance

of cabling was too intriguing to miss. This was Remsdaq, a company that specialises in detecting movement in its fibre optic cables so alerting a control room that something is happening at a remote site that shouldn’t be - in the case of the railway this would be a cable run and the disturbance could be cable theft.

Remsdaq’s technology, which uses changes in speckle patterns in a single strand of fibreoptic cable, has been in use in the real world for many years and can assist with monitoring fencing and other security applications. Lifting this technology complete and dropping it into the railway industry - or more accurately, into their very own cable trough - seemed to be a logical move. They are now engaged in trials ‘somewhere in the UK’.

WaterNot surprisingly, water seemed to preoccupy several

stands. Two companies specialised in providing dry work spaces with water all around. Seemingly holding themselves up by their bootstraps were the Portadam by OnSite (below) and the Tubewall by NOAQ. There’s sound physics behind the process, but it can look a little odd.

NOAQ also brought their WorkOnWater modular quay heading - something used all over the world and with obvious railway applications.

Before leaving the subject of water it is worth mentioning Concrete Canvas. It’s a concrete impregnated fabric that can be laid as a lining or as bank stabilisation. They have a great strap line - “Just add water”.

AssortmentsOver in the enclosed SIG’s playpen, Collis Engineering

was demonstrating a signal post that folded down - just like a lamp post. Now they’ve been around a while!

Legio Blocks - yes it is spelt correctly - are the grownups’ version of that kids’ toy. Although being made of concrete they’re just that little bit heavier. They do much the same task though - walls mainly.

And, of course, there was the large contingent of Class II electrical suppliers as a result of the change to Class II for signalling power supplies.

So it is possible to import technologies, many are doing just that and they’re not finding the process too intimidating - so far. Best of luck to them!

STRAIL vulcanisedrubber level crossings

now in 56 countriesand growing

STRAIL is a brand of the

group

Richard Whatley. STRAIL (UK) Ltd. Tannery Lane / Send / Woking / GU23 7EF / Great Britainphone +44 (14 83) 22 20 90 / fax +44 (14 83) 22 20 [email protected]

They can’t all be wrong

the rail engineer • July 201432

Page 33: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

@StobartRailLtd

Andrew Sumner

t. 01228 882 300e. [email protected]

Gary Newton

t. 01228 882 300e. [email protected]

Dave Richardson

t. 01228 882 300e. [email protected]

Rail Contracts Manager

Estimating Manager

Plant Manager

stobartrail.com

Our brand new & purpose built fleet of Ballast Whilst the machine is removing the ballast a

Replacement machines and teams are now team of road rail excavators and a permanent

available to deliver Ballast Replacement way team are working alongside to replace

Programmes and Track Lowering Schemes the ballast and to check the track geometry

nationwide. and tamp the ballast.

Old ballast is replaced with new without the If you need ballast replacement, track

need to remove track or sleepers. lowering on your route call us now to discuss

hiring the machine and our team.

Stobart Rail are pleased to announce the appointment of track lowering scheme, Chorley Flying Arches and the track

Craig Jones as Project Manager. Craig brings to the reballasting Gopher machine programme. Craig's extensive

business over 15 years of strategic high profile railway railway experience and knowledge will be fully utilised as we

project delivery experience. strive to continually improve whilst maintaining and

exceeding our commercial and operational targets.Craig has successfully delivered permanent way schemes

with Jarvis, Babcock and Network Rail. Innovation and Craig added, “I am delighted to have joined the team at

robust engineering delivery are at the very core of Craig's Stobart Rail and look forward to working with everyone in

professional outlook and he will be delivering the track order to deliver our existing contractual commitments and

requirements associated with important multi million pound the new business targets that the team has identified with

contracts for Stobart Rail, including the Walsall to Rugeley the Network Rail CP5 control period.”

Rapid Ballast Replacement on Plain Lines and through Switches & Crossings

Craig Jones, Project Manager

Page 34: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Last February, a good portion of the UK land mass appeared to be underwater and the coastline was being buffeted and bashed by storms and unprecedented high tides. This badly affected many

costal railways, but perhaps the worst problems that Network Rail had to deal with were in Devon, on the main line running along the exposed and vulnerable sea wall at Dawlish.

The damage to this coastal stretch of railway was extensive. Around 80 metres of the sea wall had initially been breached by the waves and washed out to sea but, by mid February, that breach had expanded to more than 100 metres in length and the formation and track ballast behind the wall had vanished, as had a retaining wall supporting a private roadway and then the roadway itself leaving a substantial number of houses beyond in a very precarious state (issue 113 March 2014).

First 48 hours was criticalIt’s now early summer, so The Rail Engineer has been back to Dawlish to

meet some of the engineers who were involved in putting the railway back together, to find out what they think about it all now that the adrenalin has settled and they have had time to reflect. Alex Evason was Network Rail’s senior construction manager. He was involved with the repair work throughout the period working for Tom Kirkham, the project manager for the emergency.

Alex explained that the appointment, in the first 48 hours of the emergency, of BAM Nuttall as principal contractor for the main breach of the sea wall and all the additional myriad of sites suffering from the storm damage had been critical. This ensured a clear line of command and responsibility from the start of the repair work.

Daily meetings were established at 9am and 4pm, chaired by BAM Nuttall, to ensure that plans and ideas were shared, understood and resources appropriately allocated. Amalgamated Construction (AMCO) was drafted in to provide additional expertise and support.

Andy Crowley, AMCO’s contracts manager, explained that they needed plant, resources and materials on site as quickly as possible and one of the early challenges was to develop an understanding as to how they could best use the resources available to protect the railway and minimise further deterioration whilst the storms continued to rage. To help this process, Network Rail also procured the services of Tony Gee & Partners to develop a design for repairing the main breach.

The ability for the repair team to easily and securely share large data files such as architectural blue prints with the team on the ground at Dawlish and those working at other locations including BAM Nuttall and Network Rail’s offices was critical. Alongside this was the need to incorporate separate access to site visitors, including members of the Cabinet oversight committee.

Trellisworks, a specialist wireless connectivity expert, designed and deployed an emergency communication network based around the Pepaves MAX wireless router range. This network was capable of sending and receiving large quantities of data rapidly and reliably, yet also needed to be flexible and resilient enough to cope with the changing situation on site as well as ongoing challenging weather conditions.

Rob Youster, Head of ICT at BAM Nuttall said: “We needed a communication solution that was robust and capable of handling the high-end data needs of the site. It needed to provide secure Wide Area Network (WAN) and wireless access reliably 24x7. The communications network that Trellisworks created was absolutely vital to the smooth running of this project and ensured that the team on site were able to communicate and collaborate effectively with colleagues who were not based at Dawlish.”

“You could smell the gas”The main breach became known as the “Hole” and in the early days it was

the main focus of attention. Each high tide was washing more of formation away from the railway and the roadway behind. In addition, many of the houses had been badly damaged and they had to be evacuated. Gas, sewage and water were leaking across the site from the houses so something had to be done immediately before the houses started to collapse or the site became too dangerous to work in.

Dawlish – six months on

COLLIN CARR

the rail engineer • July 201434

Page 35: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Lenny Wilkinson, BAM Nuttall’s works manager, has a reputation on site for making things happen using a network of good contacts acquired over the years. Whilst working on a previous job in Jersey, Lenny remembered that steel ship containers were being used for protection and he brought this idea for discussion to one of the daily meetings. Within 48 hours, Lenny’s coordination skills ensured that eleven new containers arrived from Southampton docks. They were cut open in preparation for filling with ballast and formation rubble on site then welded together.

Further storms on 14 February extended the “Hole” to more than 100 metres, which meant that more containers were required. Eventually, a total of nineteen sea containers were used to protect the vulnerable sea wall and, although they are now in a dilapidated state, they are still in place acting like one of those medieval shield walls providing a last line of defence. The effectiveness of this defence was discussed at a COBRA meeting chaired by the prime minister...now there’s endorsement for a good idea!

The Army offered its services and brought some interesting proposals. However, although the sea wall probably felt like a war zone, it was a different environment and the materials and skills that the army had at their disposal were not really suited to this particular task.

Relocating plant and resourcesOnce the containers were in place and

absorbing the battering from the sea, work to stabilise the site could commence. AMCO, which had been working 30 miles away in Whiteball tunnel near Taunton (issue 113, March 2014), was able to relocate its plant and spray concrete onto the exposed formation using the now redundant track as additional ballast and reinforcement. This was another critical step that bought precious time.

At its peak, 300 engineers were working day shifts followed by 200 engineers working nights. To ensure that they were able to resource such numbers, it was decided to redefine the site as a

‘High Street’ location rather than a railway location. This was possible as it was no longer a functioning railway and it meant that skilled engineers who had not worked in a railway environment before could do so without any additional site safety training. However, Alex was keen to point out that at no time were safety standards compromised and throughout this intense period of work, carried out in appalling conditions, only two minor injuries (both sprained ankles) were recorded.

Filling the HoleAMCO as the main contractor, along with

BAM, was tasked with acquiring concrete vehicle collision barriers (VCBs) from around the country.

the rail engineer • July 2014 35

Page 36: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

These were placed in the “Hole” and fixed together laterally with dowel pins and 40mm stainless steel transvers bars. Then, more than 5,000 tonnes of C50 concrete, an additional 150 tonnes of steel, and a new 600ft-long section of track were used to complete the repairs.

More than 450 metres of parapet sea wall was either badly damaged or missing altogether along with associated footpaths, walkways and steps. Hanson’s precast concrete works at Derby provided L-shaped units within three weeks. These ranged from 2 to 3.25 metres high, 1.2 to 1.6 metres wide and 1.6 metres long and they were used both behind the parapet sea wall and the retaining wall for the roadway behind. Cornish Concrete produced 260 coping stones weighing 1.8 tonnes each.

Hanson also provided pumped concrete to the site, using highly-skilled professionals concrete pumping services which had the expertise to get the material to this exposed location. This was not an easy matter since the only access way to the “Hole” was down a series of narrow flights of stairs winding between houses on a very steep incline.

Dawlish station repairsIn addition to this major damage at Dawlish, there were at least five other

locations between there and Dawlish Warren where the sea wall had also been breached, albeit not as severely. Dawlish station had also taken a battering, the wooden down platform boarding had been ripped out and furnishings badly damaged, and there were concerns about the stability of the sea wall at a number of other locations further up the coast in the Teignmouth area.

The SISK Group carried out repairs and reconstruction of the down platform at Dawlish station while Dyer & Butler focused on other repairs to the sea wall between Parsons Tunnel and Teignmouth station. Lee Davey, senior site agent, explained that they were the local maintainers and so they were able to add vital knowledge and expertise to the team.

More than 37 individual landslips were identified. One, known as the Woodland landslip, was particularly worrying and was one of the reasons why the completion date was at one point revised to 28 April. AMCO’s specialist contractor CAN, working at Woodlands to stabilise the bankslip, reported back-scars that were initially 80 metres long and three to five metres deep. Because of the torrential rain these scars were growing, becoming anything up to ten metres deep, which indicated that there was some serious ground movement taking place.

Drone technologyAMCO procured the services of a drone

that had been used on the previous year’s slip site adjacent to the Woodlands location. The drone was able to take pictures that confirmed the concern that a 55 metre high cliff was slowly releasing 35,000 tonnes of debris onto the tracks. To deal with this AMCO, then procured the services of the USAR (urban search and rescue) from the Devon & Cornwall Fire Brigade and China Clay, both experts in the field of high-pressure water pumping equipment. This expertise was used to accelerate the failure of the slip by a combination of pumping water into the back-scar to lubricate the slip plain and hydro-cutting the cliff face, as is common practise in the world of quarrying and mining. This proved successful and the debris was then disposed of into the sea with kind permission and approval from the Maritime Marine Organisation.

Dyer & Butler then had to repair the parapet wall that had been damaged by the slip.

So, although the potential slip put back the expected reopening of the line from around mid-March to mid-April, Network Rail was subsequently able to announce that the line would reopen on Friday 4 April in time for the Easter holidays. David Cameron officially declared the line open. The local community laid on an event in the town hall for the Orange Army; clearly they had appreciated all that had been done on their behalf.

It has been a field day for the press with spectacular pictures and videos of a washed away railway protected by a sacrificial wall of ship containers, welded together, filled with rock and rubble and lined up on the footpath in front of the 100 metre breach. It took teamwork to put everything back together, and all those involved commented that everyone pulled together. Frequent mention was made of the many suppliers and sub contractors who played an invaluable part in ensuring that everything possible was done to ensure that the railway was restored as soon as was humanly possible.

soil nailing thecliffs at Dawlish

www.can.ltd.uk

the rail engineer • July 201436

Page 37: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Secondary wallWith an overall cost in the region of £35 million, it has been an expensive experience for Network Rail. So what will happen

in the future? What has been learnt? Well, AMCO has now been appointed as principal contractor for the next phase. Approximately £8.5 million is being

made available to complete the construction of a secondary wall in front of the original Brunel wall and the plan is to have this secure by the end of the summer. A marine approach to the works will be adopted, with new pre-cast wall sections being lifted in by jack-up-barges to minimise disruption to train services.

Dyer & Butler will continue to work within a budget of £500,000 to carry out day-to-day maintenance including pointing. A five-year plan is being developed to improve the resilience of the wall and there is a feasibility study underway by Tony Gee & Partners to consider the viability of seven alternative routes.

Finally, as Alex pointed out many times, it was fundamentally a team effort with everyone working together to restore a railway for the benefit of the West Country. Alex also added that the local community, particularly hotels and suppliers, did very well out of the disruption and there was a boost for the local economy. It just goes to show that every cloud does have a silver lining of sorts!

the rail engineer • July 2014 37

Page 38: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

If you were presented with a project that offered reduced journey times, improved connectivity between growing conurbations, new routes for rail freight traffic, regional growth and benefits to local communities with the potential for creating 12000 new jobs, less road traffic so less

pollution and congestion, what more would you want?

Well, that’s what the proposed East West Rail (EWR) is offering and it’s a ‘no brainer’ as they say. Liking no brainers, The Rail Engineer visited Bernard Hulland, Network Rail’s project development manager, at their offices in Milton Keynes.

EWR is not a simple concept as it has aspirations to link Oxford, Bicester, Bletchley, Milton Keynes, Aylesbury, Cambridge and beyond into East Anglia. It is a major project that establishes a strategic railway connecting East Anglia with Central, Southern and Western England bringing with it the inevitable challenges and opportunities for the railway engineering community.

Old railways revitalised and upgradedBernard explained that the East West Rail

project was originally promoted by the EWR Consortium consisting of local authorities and other organisations with an interest in improving access through this growth area. In 2012, the ‘Western Section’, comprising Oxford to Bicester and Bicester/Princes Risborough to Milton Keynes/Bedford, was included in the High Level Output Statement by the Department for Transport. It became a commitment for Network Rail to deliver during Control Period 5 (2014-19) although the Bletchley to Bedford upgrading is more likely to be done in Control Period 6 forming a third phase.

The ‘Central Section’ will run from Bedford to Cambridge, while the ‘Eastern Section’ will take the route out to Norwich and Ipswich.

The first phase of the ‘Western Section’ extends from Oxford to Bicester, refurbishing approximately 14 miles of a low speed, single line route currently used for local passenger and some freight traffic. Much of the old double track was removed in the 1970s and the associated embankments and bridges have been allowed to decline so they need to be restored to modern standards.

In fact, this part of the project is based upon an existing project developed by Chiltern Railways, formerly known as the Evergreen 3 scheme. The original main aim of the Evergreen 3 scheme was to provide Chiltern Railways and its passengers with a new route from the city of Oxford into London’s Marylebone Station. It will be the first new rail route from a city into London for 100 years.

The EWR project is not changing this aspiration but it is raising the specification for the route between Oxford and Bicester from a single line with loops to a 14 mile two track railway to accommodate both the half hourly Chiltern Railways service and the later introduction of half hourly EWR services to Milton Keynes and Bedford. The work throughout the route has been let to a joint venture between Buckingham Group and Carillion, contract value £87 million.

Work is already underway to create a new chord linking the line from Oxford into the Chiltern main line and there will be an extensively upgraded Bicester Town station to accommodate this route alongside the main Chiltern line. In addition, Islip station will be fully refurbished with new platforms and car parking to cater for the two tracks and the expected rise in volume of passengers.

A new Oxford Parkway station is being built at Water Eaton alongside the existing Park and Ride facility. This work will be completed by spring 2015, when the station will act as the terminus until a new track layout is completed between Oxford North Junction, near Wolvercote, and Oxford station. A new platform will be constructed at Oxford station and the work is expected to be completed by the following spring in 2016.

East West Rail

OXFORD

TO READING TO LONDON

BICESTER

AYLESBURY

MILTON KEYNES

BLETCHLEY

BEDFORD

WESTERN SECTIONCENTRAL SECTIONEASTERN SECTION

CAMBRIDGE

NORWICH

IPSWICH

ELY

WINSLOW

unleashing the potentialCOLLIN CARR

the rail engineer • July 201438

Page 39: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Rail construction services include: Stations and Passenger Area construction and refurbishment Rail engineering; civil & structural engineering Bridge Structures and Retaining Walls, including Piling Lineside Structures, Foundations, Culverts and Ancillary Struc-

tures Earthworks, Embankments and Cuttings Embankment construction, stabilisation and protection Railway track beds & ballast operations Major re-signalling schemes Platform construction and extensions

Troughing Route Station car parks; at grade, decked and multi-storey Depots and Trainwash facilities

All Operations are undertaken under a full, Network Rail approved, Prin-cipal Contractors Licence (PCL) and all appropriate Link-Up product code registrations.

Buckingham Group Contracting Ltd. Silverstone Road, Stowe, Buckingham MK18 5LJ

Tel: 01280 823355; E-mail: [email protected]

Removing level crossingsAt present there are thirty-seven level crossings catering for different

needs along the route between Oxford and Bicester. All except the Bicester London Road crossing, which will become a refurbished full barrier level crossing, will be removed. Some will be replaced by bridges, some will have the right of way amended and some will disappear altogether.

The existing signalling system for the route is totally inadequate and it is being replaced by Siemens which is installing a modern Solid State Interlocking (SSI) system. This will largely be controlled from the Marylebone signalling centre with the Didcot signalling centre being responsible for the Oxford end of the route.

Flood modellingMuch of the route is in the River Thames flood plain and, as many will

recall, flooding in this area featured quite prominently throughout last winter. Network Rail procured the services of Wallingford HydroSolutions (WHS) to review the plans for the project so that they do not aggravate the flooding problem in the area and, most importantly, to ensure that new assets are not exposed to flood risk and potential failure.

WHS has identified a number of locations that would benefit from further detailed flood modelling. For example, the closure of some redundant crossings and their associated structures, the construction of new access roadways and the creation of new track formations all have the potential to create additional flooding problems. The modelling was used to design mitigation measures, such as compensatory storage areas, to help control the flood risk identified. The modelling has also been used by WHS to help Network Rail identify areas where compensatory storage could be discounted or reduced in area and depth. This has been crucial in some areas of the scheme that pass through protected archaeological features. It has been estimated that for this first phase of the EWR project, the benefits of this modelling work has saved the project more than £100,000 so far.

Flooding and other environmental issues will always play a significant role in such a picturesque and environmentally sensitive area as the Chilterns and it is not surprising that bats in Wolvercote Tunnel, badgers throughout

Results of EA modelling.

the rail engineer • July 2014 39

Page 40: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

the area and of course, our good friend the Great Crested Newt have all demanded a certain amount of attention. In fact, the newt has ensured that about 30km of special newt resistant fencing has had to be installed.

This phase of work will also bring important conurbations such as High Wycombe into the scheme offering further transport links to Oxford and onwards as well as starting to introduce additional pathways for freight traffic.

The second phase, which is between Bicester/Princes Risborough and Milton Keynes/Bedford (although as already stated, Bletchley to Bedford upgrading is likely to be completed after 2019), has significant potential to further enhance these and many more options. The sum of two million pounds was raised by the consortium group to enable Atkins to carry out a detailed feasibility report for this route, outlining the work that would be required to enable the following pattern of train service to operate efficiently and effectively:

• Oxford to Milton Keynes - 1train/hr;• Oxford to Bedford - 1train/hr;• Aylesbury to Milton Keynes - 1 train/hr;• Bletchley to Bedford - 1 local train/hr;• Spare capacity to be built in for additional passenger and freight

traffic.Structural assessment of viaduct

This second phase was sold to the DfT and now forms part of the CP5 package of work. It will require the mothballed line, last used in 1992, to be brought back into use. This includes the lightly used Bletchley Viaduct with its prestressed concrete beam structure, completed in 1962. Core samples are currently being extracted from the structure to assess its condition and ability to carry future loading requirements. In addition, a large amount of vegetation has been cleared from the disused section of line so that a topographical survey can be undertaken. This phase is planned to be completed in 2019, which is the end of the financial period.

Further extension, over the proposed EWR ‘Central Section’, from Bedford to Cambridge, has not yet been defined in detail but definition is imminent. Unfortunately, parts of the old railway now have structures such as radio telescopes and housing developments built on them, especially in the Sandy and Cambridge areas, so at present plans are aspirational. However, there is the potential for a radical new railway and the will certainly appears to be there.

Whilst all this is going on there are plans being developed for the HS2 route to come near Aylesbury and to cross the East West railway between Bicester and Bletchley. Whether this will happen remains to be seen as it’s not quite a no brainer with estimates in the billions! However, costs for the Oxford, Aylesbury to Bedford part of the scheme are in the region of £270 million, with the completed EWRL scheme estimated at approximately £530 million.

The benefits outlined earlier and the opportunity to create new alternative routes for freight and passengers alike, plus the added potential benefits for commuters and land developers, mean that this ‘no brainer’ really does appear to have the basic credentials. It will also enable railway engineers to use their brain and ingenuity to ensure that the many challenges that will emerge will be met with skill and effective solutions, as always!

BEDFORD

RIDGMONTWOBURN SANDS

MILTON KEYNES

BLETCHLEY

WINSLOW

AYLESBURYOXFORD PARKWAY

ISLIP

BICESTER TOWN

OXFORD

CULHAM

DIDCOT PARKWAY

READING

AYLESBURY VALE PARKWAY

PRINCES RISBOROUGH

Results of WHS refined modelling, demonstrating reduced flooding extent.

the rail engineer • July 201440

Page 41: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

THE COMPLETE SIGNALLING SOLUTION

excellence in train control +44 (0) 1923 635 000 [email protected] www.signallingsolutions.comSignalling Solutions Limited, Bridgefoot House, Watling Street, Radlett, WD7 7HT

a Balfour Beatty and Alstom company

Signalling Solutions is a leader in the provision of train control solutions in the UK, offering a complete range of services from design to full project delivery. Our solutions are ERTMS ready, in successful operation and providing signifi cant benefi ts to operators across Europe.Our expertise and experience in supporting the UK’s rail network and in delivering cutting edge technology

- such as the introduction of the European Rail Traffi c Management System - has placed us at the heart of innovation and technological development within the sector. In an ever increasing and competitive market place Signalling Solutions is building a strong reputation for meeting the control requirements for the railway of the future.

Delivering expertise and experience

Page 42: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

There have been several articles already on ERTMS (European Rail Traffic Management System) published in The Rail Engineer, and there will be many more as the years progress. This vitally

important system for the future of signalling and train control is slowly rolling out across Europe.

Here in the UK, another milestone has been reached with testing of several equipment types on the Hertford Loop test track in north London. Known as ENIF (ERTMS National Integration Facility), it is an important preliminary before future main line deployment.

The need for a test siteOne of the specified features of ERTMS is that it must be interoperable.

This means that the manufacturers of both lineside infrastructure equipment and train-borne radios and control units must work seamlessly with each other. It sounds simple. However, in the European development process, it has been anything but.

Designers of signalling systems have a long pedigree of making things different, both to be different from other suppliers and as new technology has emerged. Signalling also has to facilitate operating rules, these being different in most countries. When signalling was primarily infrastructure based, it did not matter too much but, once signalling kit becomes partially train borne, it is essential that the various piece parts are compatible with each other.

It could be argued that, providing the specification is rigorous enough, then interoperability will happen by default. Sadly, this has not been the case and much development aggravation has occurred in mainland Europe. Network Rail, being mindful of these problems, has set out to prove that different types of equipment will work harmoniously together. Hence the ENIF project.

What the tests will achieveERTMS has two main constituent parts - ETCS (European Train Control

System) and GSM-R (the rail adaptation of the public GSM mobile radio standard). The first represents the signalling element and the second the transmission path between control centre and train.

The Network Rail framework contract to supply of ETCS has selected four companies to compete for the long term business - Signalling Solutions Ltd (a consortium of Alstom and Balfour Beatty), Infrasig (a collaboration between Bombardier and Carillion), Siemens Rail Automation (formerly Invensys / Westinghouse) and Ansaldo STS (which supplied the pilot ERTMS project on the Cambrian route) and these companies have to prove the compatibility of their equipment with each other.

The line between Hertford North and Stevenage is double track but, in off peak hours, it has only one train per hour in each direction. Hence a five-mile section of the down line has been made available as a test track with single line working on the up line for the passenger service. A changeover switch in Kings Cross power box enables the test track section to be isolated on demand and, once switched in, testing can take place within the five-mile limit without any control from KX.

A Class 313 EMU has been converted to be the test train and is fitted with Alstom ETCS train equipment. The four suppliers have all provided ground equipment, mainly the track-mounted balises that give position information and the interface to the control system. Each company is allotted specific days when their system is under test, these being conducted from the ENIF control centre which is located in Hitchin.

Controlling ETCSETCS still requires computer-based interlockings (or even relay

interlockings with the right interface equipment) for the safe setting of routes and junction control. Between these and the control centre screens is a Radio Block Centre (RBC) that interprets the requirements for the ongoing route and translates this into a Movement Authority (MA) that is sent to the train. The interlocking and RBC are proprietary to the particular supplier and, at the Hitchin site, each of these is given a test lab where their control centre is installed. These labs are security controlled so that no-one can steal ideas from another party.

The route setting screens are similar to those that might be seen in any modern IECC using a mouse or tracker ball to select the route of the intended train path.

ERTMS UK Test Site

CLIVE KESSELL

the rail engineer • July 201442

Page 43: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

A summary of the four systems is as follows: » SSL (Alstom) - interlocking is the latest Smartlock 400 with the RBC based

on similar technology. MAs are shown slightly differently to conventional route setting. ETCS will offer less restrictive approach control to junctions and similarly easier permissive entry to occupied platforms.

» Ansaldo STS - uses an SEI interlocking linked to its own RBC. The equipment is essentially similar to that at Machynlleth on the Cambrian line.

» Infrasig (Bombardier) - interlocking is the latest EbiLock product with a compatible RBC.

» Siemens (ex Invensys) - interlocking is the Westlock product and compatible RBC. Has conventional route setting procedures and the system will also be used for testing ETCS with an ATO overlay for Thameslink.

During the allocated test period, each product controls the test track section and issues MAs to the test train for the test programme of the day. Conditions to be tested include the introduction of temporary speed restrictions and emergency stops.

Since the line retains conventional signals for normal operation, the test train has to pass these. It is possible to set an MA that allows the train past a red signal but this is considered disconcerting for drivers and thus the ENIF control is configured to ensure such signals always show a proceed aspect.

The balise operation is slightly different for each manufacturer’s kit and thus these have to be reconfigured prior to the particular day’s testing. The connection of the individual firm’s control to the ground equipment uses the FTN network and is configured by jack-in plugs and sockets on a patch panel.

Each firm is also required to model ETCS for the London to Heathrow and London to Wood Green routes so as to simulate capacity on a busy piece of railway. A temptation to be resisted will be requests from operators to customise the system for ‘special’ UK requirements. The ultimate goal is for any train arriving through the Channel Tunnel to be capable of working seamlessly to the British ERTMS package.

The train-borne systemThe test train is equipped with:

» The EVC (European Vital Computer) that receives and interprets the commands from the RBC;

» The driver’s control panel showing the Movement Authority as a moving band on the outside of the speedometer and with the driver having to keep the speed inside this limit otherwise alarms and braking will occur;

» A Eurobalise reader mounted under the train to give position information and data for forthcoming stations, level crossings, etc;

» Two forms of odometry, both doppler radar and a traditional tachometer, to measure distance from each balise;

» A GSM-R data radio to receive the radio-borne MA instructions.

the rail engineer • July 2014 43

Page 44: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Although only one type of train kit is installed on the test train, other types of rolling stock will come to Hertford for compatibility testing. It is estimated that the design, fabrication and fitting of a first-in-class installation takes 18 months with the train being out of service for around 12-16 weeks. Thereafter, fleet fitment should be about two weeks for each vehicle. Driver training is expected to take 2 weeks for full ETCS conditions.

A lesson learned from the Cambrian is that retro-fitting is both messy and costly. There will be franchise implications in the future and ETCS fitment may well become part of a franchise condition. Whenever possible, ETCS will be part of a fleet renewal programme and all vehicles ordered after Jan 2012 or delivered after Jan 2015 must have provision for the system.

Network Rail is likely to sponsor the ROSCOs (Rolling Stock Companies) for retro fitting on a national fleet basis. Similarly for the 850 ‘go anywhere’ freight locos, funding will be made available for the retrofit programme. Network Rail’s fleet of engineering trains and on-track machines must also be fitted but more difficult are locomotives associated with charter and heritage operations.

A solution for steam engines is proving elusive but where there is a will, there will be a way.

GSM-R radioGSM-R as a track-to-train voice facility is now well established on

Network Rail. However, the radio network has also to be a bearer for ETCS and currently this uses circuit switching in that, once a train is logged on, it remains connected for the duration of the journey. This is not an efficient use of spectrum and channel limitations will not permit ETCS to be used in busy traffic areas.

The solution is packet switching (known as GPRS) and entails sending packets of data to a train when required. Signal engineers have reservations about the integrity of this but recognise the advantages. As a result, GPRS is being tested at ENIF on behalf of the ERTMS User Group based in Brussels. So far the results are encouraging and the UK is leading the way for Europe and wider climes.

When GSM-R is used to support ETCS, it is usual to provide additional lineside base stations to provide continuous coverage should a single base station fail. This has happened at Hertford with part of the testing including operation with a switched-out base station.

Siemens system under test.

Displays from Infrasig (front) and Siemens (behind).

On board display being explained by Bob Barnard (SSL).

the rail engineer • July 201444

Page 45: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Bombardier has pioneered the development of ERTMS Level 1, 2 and Regional, as demonstrated in over 20 projects worldwide. Our wayside and onboard systems have been implemented on more than 18,000 km of track and 2,500 vehicles.

Bombardier systems are easily adapted to existing equipment and can deliver increased safety, interoperability, high speed and reduced need for wayside infrastructure.

www.bombardier.com

From innovation to installation

………………BombardierINTERFLOfor ERTMS ……………

www.bombardier.com

Bombardier has pioneered the development of ERTMS Level 1, Level 2 and Regional, as demonstrated in over 30 projects worldwide. Our wayside and onboard systems have been implemented on more than 21,000 km of track and 2,300 vehicles.

Bombardier systems are easily adapted to existing equipment and can deliver increased safety, interoperability, high speed and reduced need for wayside infrastructure.

BOMBARDIER INTERFLO FOR ERTMS

© 2

013

. Bo

mb

ard

ier

Inc

. or

its

sub

sid

iari

es.

All

rig

hts

re

serv

ed

.

FROM INNOVATION TO INSTALLATION

A4 Fast train IRSE.indd 1 27/08/2013 11:04

Page 46: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

The Thameslink dimensionThe decision by the Thamelink upgrade authorities to use ERTMS for

its central London core brings about new challenges. To achieve the 24 trains per hour criteria, automatic train operation is needed and this means providing an ATO overlay to the basic ETCS package.

Again, the UK will be pioneering this facility for Europe. Siemens has the contract to provide the system but sensibly has requested using the Hertford track to test it. Part of the line will thus replicate the Farringdon to Blackfriars section, needing additional signals and links to the Thameslink development centre in James Forbes House near London Bridge.

With the main ETCS integration tests largely complete, the test line will be handed over to Siemens and the Thameslink team in November 2014.

DeploymentHaving witnessed the problems with the roll out of ERTMS in Europe,

Network Rail is wise to provide the Hertford / Hitchin test facility. If nothing else, it has driven the message home to manufacturers that interoperability must be achieved.

Although the software level of the infrastructure equipment is version 2.3.0d which will eventually need upgrading to 3.0.0 or later derivatives, this should happen as a cross industry roll out with insistence on backward compatibility.

Hertford has its limitations; the maximum line speed is only 70kph and there are no junctions under ETCS control. A next step is to equip the Old Dalby test line where speeds up to 180kph are possible. It will also give unlimited access, not possible at Hertford as the line has to be handed back for peak hours.

The main line deployment of ERTMS is aligned to route modernisation so time is short to get the major contracts let. Currently, future implementation plans are: » Great Western main line Paddington to Heathrow - 2017 » Great Western main line Paddington to Bristol - 2019 » Thameslink fleet service - 2018 » East Coast main line Kings Cross to Wood Green 2018 » Northern City line Moorgate to Drayton Park- 2018 » East Coast main line Kings Cross to Doncaster - 2020 » Midland main line - 2022

One of the suppliers is intent on offering ERTMS Level 3 as part of the package using experience gained in Kazakhstan. This is intended as a potential package for secondary routes and has the advantage of further reducing lineside infrastructure.

ERTMS will reduce the cost of signalling but, above all, it will yield important capacity benefits. It sits alongside the 12 regional operating centres and the traffic management systems as the cornerstone of Network Rail’s train control strategy. Much is at stake but with customer and industry working together, it will succeed.

Thanks are expressed to the ERTMS programme, project and engineering teams for facilitating the visit and the openness in explaining the system.

Thameslink POSA (Proceed-on-Sight-Authority) Signal. Note ERTMS block marker (yellow arrow) behind.

the rail engineer • July 201446

Page 47: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Siemens Rail Automation 2014

At Siemens, we create the solutions that are taking the rail industry into the future, safely.

We’re proud of our 170 year heritage. Yet what drives us is looking ahead. We work with key clients and partners, to deliver some of the world’s most advanced rail automation technology.

Siemens signalling, control and communication solutions improve availability and efficiency, provide more accurate and simpler control, and enhance communications for more efficient operation.

From consultation and design to commissioning, Siemens makes global expertise work, locally. Today and tomorrow.

siemens.co.uk/rail

Your route to the futureThis way for greater efficiency

0322 Rail Engineer Ad (rail live guide ).indd 1 17/06/2014 13:22

Page 48: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

An update on Manchester VictoriaRevitalisation progressing well!

the rail engineer • July 201448

Page 49: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

COLLIN CARR

Manchester Victoria station is not one of the country’s great stations. Voted “the worst station in the country” in a 2009 Department for Transport-commissioned report, it was badly in need of improvement. Network Rail’s plans to rectify this undesirable status and

to transform the station into a key interchange location for transport in the city of Manchester were outlined in issue 105 (July 2013).

So, one year on, it was time to revisit the site to meet Faisal Farooq, Network Rail’s scheme project manager and Nick Culshaw, Morgan Sindall’s project director, to find out what progress had been made. The changes were very evident and quite significant.

Detailed heritage surveyThroughout the early stages of the project,

there had been detailed discussions with Manchester City Council and English Heritage about the removal of the existing station roof. This was not a simple process given that the station is a Grade II listed building, so a detailed heritage survey was commissioned to establish whether there were any unique engineering aspects to the roof that needed to be retained and preserved for future generations. As none were found, full demolition was allowed and the old train shed no longer exists.

As Faisal pointed out, the demolition was really a careful dismantling of the roof. It was carried out as part of the Morgan Sindall contract using

the services of Crossways Scaffolding (Elland) group to supply and erect the scaffold.

The scaffold is a new lightweight system provided by a Dutch company, Van Thiel. It uses fewer loose components, thus reducing the risk to the public passing underneath - a detail that will be appreciated by one of the key stakeholders for this project, Northern Rail. It is also more efficient to erect than conventional scaffolding, since construction requires less manpower, and takes less time because of its push/fit system, an advantage when working over a live railway.

Before the £16 million new roof consisting of fifteen steel box girder rib units, each weighing up to 70 tonnes, could be erected, a considerable amount of ground work was required. Each rib unit is designed to be supported by an 18 metre high steel tubular column and anchored on a four metre high reinforced concrete buttress. Therefore, more than 100 continuous flight auger (CFA) piles have been installed for the buttresses and 66 auger piles for the columns.

Protecting the culvert In addition, there is an 8 metre high by 11

metre wide culvert, which has a shallow cover, carrying the river Irk under part of the site. Therefore, to protect the culvert from additional loading, the design required two reinforced concrete bridge spans approximately 22 metres long by 4 metres wide, to carry loading from specific columns and buttresses. An additional bridge span of similar size but using precast concrete construction was needed for distribution of loading from railway tracks. Auger piling was necessary for all three bridge decks. All this work has now been completed.

Whilst the ground works were underway, fifteen steel box-girder rib units were fabricated for Morgan Sindall by Severfield-Watson Structures Ltd. As part of the contract, Severfield is also responsible for site preparation and final positioning of all the rib units. To date, five of the 1.2 metre deep and 0.5 metre wide rib units are now in place.

The units are delivered by road to site in 24 metre sections. They are then welded together and lifted directly from the welding area seated onto a buttress and fixed into position on one of the 18 metre high tubular columns with a pin joint. To complete this very challenging lift sequence, a 1,200 tonne mobile crane is being used. Cranes of this size are a very scarce resource and everything is being put into place so that the remaining 10 rib units can be installed as one batch later in this summer.

Once the main rib units are in place, lateral steel bracing is being fitted to provide a framework designed to support cushioned clear light reflecting panels made from ETFE (ethylene tetraflouroethylene). This material was used for the refurbishment of Piccadilly station in Manchester ten years ago and also forms the roof of another highly prestigious building - the Eden

the rail engineer • July 2014 49

Page 50: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

project in Cornwall. ETFE has everything going for it since it is lighter than glass and cheaper as well as safer. The manufacturers also claim that it lets in more light than glass. It has certainly succeeded in making the station brighter and more inviting to pass through or visit.

Working with TfGMNetwork Rail has also needed to liaise with

Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM), another key stakeholder, to preserve its operations that pass through the station either side of an island platform. Network Rail had to ensure and reassure TfGM that services would not be hindered whilst construction work took place. To minimise passenger disruption, and for design synergy and cost benefits, TfGM decided to include the full remodelling of the Victoria station tram stop which comprises three new tram lines, two island platforms, switches and overhead lines in the works. Network Rail agreed to deliver these works on behalf of TfGM as part of the scheme.

At present, metro trains are able to pass through the station without stopping using a simple train token system for safety. This process is in place whilst the additional island platform is being constructed in preparation for two new tracks to be installed and the third track to be realigned ready to receive the next phase of development for this rapidly expanding metro system.

Besides the existing TfGM island platform, Victoria station has two bay platforms, numbered 1 and 2. There are also through platforms, 3 to 6, which are located under the modern Manchester Arena which was built in 1995. The Arena has quite a significant impact on the footfall of the station since it can accommodate 21,000 people. One of the main exit routes from the Manchester Arena leads onto a stairway situated alongside the main entrance to platforms 3 to 6 and the existing concourse area.

Congested siteThis was not an ideal arrangement and

following detailed discussions with the Arena, it was agreed that a fourth bridge was required for the project. This new, much longer and wider footbridge is now nearly complete. It consists of a steel deck with reinforced concrete flooring finished with terrazzo tiling.

As both Nick and Faisal frequently pointed out, the site is very congested and, when there is a live event taking place, the influx of an additional mass of people is challenging for the hardiest

the rail engineer • July 201450

Page 51: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

+44 (0)1255 [email protected]

www.duracomposites.comDura PlatformComposite Structural Station Platforms

...designed for the future

Welcome to the game changing rail plaform solution designed to save time and moneythroughout the supply chain. The unique patented design provides contractors with a systemthat overcomes many of today’s challenges such as drainage, surface mounted fixings,irregular lines, colour fade, cable management and most of all station disruption.

Spans up to3800mm @ 5kN/m2

Concealed FixingSystem

Incorporates Fall for Drainage

Fast Install MinimisesTrack Time

HEAVY DUTY HEAVY DUTY

CO

NCEALED FIXINGS C

ONCEALED FIXIN

GS

FAST INSTALL FAST INSTALL

EASY DRAINAGE EASY DRAINAGE

Industrial Rail Marine Landscaping Architectural

Patent pending

Dura 190x133mm ad_v1.qxd:Layout 1 25/06/2014 16:47 Page 1

of project managers. The completion of this bridge will lead people to the station exit for rail or Metrolink services. This separates visitors to the Arena from the travelling passenger, a much needed improvement that will be most welcome by everyone.

Protecting our heritage The need to preserve the heritage of this

station is a topic that keeps re-emerging. For example, even though the old roof had no specific heritage value it was decided to construct a zinc outline profile of the old roof onto the wall of the station building. This zinc outline will be illuminated by LED lighting at night to remind everyone what was there before.

Sections of the existing Victorian building are also being refurbished, including mosaic floors, wooden panelling and an ornate stained glass dome over the current bar area of the station buffet. Three war memorials within the station will be restored including an archway that was the entrance for troops going off to the trenches in the First World War - a timely memorial. An old tiled map of the Lancashire & Yorkshire Railway is being cleaned plus an old canopy stretching the whole length of the station building is currently being repainted and refurbished.

Every effort is being made to turn Victoria Station into a location that is at the heart of the Network Rail northern hub, an investment of over £1 billion which will provide faster, more frequent services across the north. The existing footfall is significant, the impact of huge numbers of additional people is being managed, and new modern innovative ideas such as the new roof are being introduced.

Yet, while all this is happening, there is a noticeable acknowledgement and respect for the social, historical and architectural heritage that clearly evident throughout the site. The refurbishment of this site seems to be in good hands and passengers and local people will appreciate the attention to detail that is being included in the revitalisation of this very important transport interchange.

the rail engineer • July 2014 51

Page 52: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

CLIVE KESSELLStation announcements have long been the trigger for comedian’s jokes on stage, the

impersonation of garbled messages always good for bringing a laugh.

Some of this implied criticism is valid but so many of the larger stations are acoustic horrors, the enclosed space with an overall roof being a fine echo chamber. Railway engineers have tried several theories and methods down the years to improve the quality of sound but never quite reached what could be called perfection.

Maybe the problem has no universal solution but in Scotland and in response to considerable public comment, Network Rail decided to engage some of the best brains in the acoustics industry to properly analyse the circumstances of Edinburgh Waverley prior to committing to hardware renewal. This has proved quite a challenge but the results are impressive.

Assessing the stationEdinburgh Waverley station is set in a hollow,

so is relatively long with four through platforms and a number of bays at the east and west ends. Road access is from a ramp off the North Bridge that spans the hollow, leading to a central concourse area with taxis and other vehicles all descending to this level. Pedestrian steps and escalators from the north (Princes Street) and south (the Old City) lead to a footbridge across the complex with stairs down to platform level. The central part of the station is protected by an overall roof.

Much has been done in recent years to improve the fabric of the station and add more platforms but all work has needed to take account of the listed building status. Train services are about half diesel, half electric, so ambient noise levels vary considerably. As with most big stations, retail outlets abound and there is a ‘quiet’ central waiting area - passengers and staff in all of these need to hear important announcements.

Another factor entering the equation has been the need to improve the fire alarm and evacuation procedures from such a diverse site. Normal alarm bells do not trigger the public reaction that is required and most people just stand around wondering what all the noise is. A verbal message is much more effective and the VA (Voice Alarm) requirement became part of the project. Sounds straightforward enough but the impact is to make the resulting PA (Public Address) a safety system and this introduces significant requirements for reliability and availability.

Designing the systemThe prime need has been to get clear and

concise sound to every part of the station regardless of the ambient conditions. The novel element to achieve this is the use of intelligent loudspeakers. These are formed in long columns of individual speaker units, each of which has its own sound setting. The amplifier for the unit is contained within the loudspeaker column, thus each of these needs a power supply as well as a cable for the input sound signal.

Some 47 of these intelligent speakers are used in the central area where the overall roof (train shed) covers the station, there being three types - ’64’ very big; ‘48’ medium; ‘32’ small. The goal is to have a constant output volume whether standing close to the speaker or 50 metres from it. This suggests negating the laws of physics but amazingly it does work.

Each speaker has two audio feeds separated, wherever possible, in diverse routes to obtain maximum reliability and a data cable enabling each speaker to be separately monitored. All are set up individually and programmed in line with sound measurements taken on site.

The intelligent speakers are complemented by some 300 normal speakers mounted on lampposts and off canopies, in shops and customer locations, away from the train shed area. These latter operate from a conventional 100V line.

The system includes noise-sensing microphones so as to adjust sound levels if high background noise levels occur, typically a diesel train idling or starting away. Feedback from this is sent to the speaker amplifiers but once the announcement has started, the level will remain unchanged until completion.

Edinburgh CallingEdinburgh CallingEdinburgh Callingthe rail engineer • July 201452

Page 53: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

One of the type 64 speaker arrays.

the rail engineer • July 2014 53

Page 54: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

New nodesDistribution of sound from the central node unit located in the station

basement to so many speakers was a challenge so ‘sub nodes’ have been provided in the north, west and east sections of the station. These are linked together by a fibre optic ring and enable a significant reduction in conventional cabling.

Getting the power distribution has been a major challenge. The main unit is sited next to the central node and comprises an Uninterruptable Power Supply (UPS) with associated battery. The battery supply has sufficient capacity to maintain the system in full operation for at least a half hour and an evacuation broadcast to all alarm zones for around another 30 minutes. However, this is considered insufficiently robust and so a standby generator will kick in after a three minute in-built delay if the mains power fails.

The importance of resilient power arrangements has resulted in some very large cables to connect the five nodes. Finding cable routes with a sufficient bending radius tested the initiative of the installation team.

The PA in operationAlmost all train announcements are automatically generated and

triggered. The pre-recording was done by the ATOS operation in Nottingham but using a person with a Scottish accent to ensure familiarity with the local populace.

Management of announcements is controlled from Nottingham and transmitted to Edinburgh via a router in Birmingham. Triggering of messages uses a combination of timetable and train running databases. Such is the advancement of message construction from individual words and phrases that it is not obvious to the untrained ear that it is computer derived.

Currently, only a single message is made for each train service, this being broadcast five minutes before departure giving platform number, departure time and calling points. Arrival information is only announced for trains not terminating at Edinburgh.

Additional messages are broadcast if disruption occurs. Although a zoning facility does exist, currently every announcement is heard everywhere. Microphones for live messages are located in the station reception office and the signalling control centre, needed mostly for ‘person alert’ communication but also if serious out-of-course situations occur.

Retail units, the ticket office and all other public areas can be programmed whether or not to have train announcements depending on the disturbance likely to result, but must receive any voice alarm messages.

Voice Alarm operationAny fire alarm activation from a call point or smoke detector will initiate an

alert to the station reception and triggers a ‘call to inspector’ voice message. That person then has six minutes to go to the alarm site and check whether the situation is indeed a real problem or, more likely, an equipment fault or minor incident such as the toast being burnt. If no further action is needed, a call to the station reception will lead to the alert being re-set.

Failure to resolve the alarm trigger within six minutes will result in a voice evacuation message being broadcast. Should a second alarm be generated during the six-minute timescale, the evacuation message will immediately result.

Controlling an evacuation is itself a challenge and with the arrival of fire engines and personnel, additional information will be broadcast from one of five Fire Microphones that are positioned around the station (pictured above). From these, the public will be told the routes to be followed and any other relevant data.

This procedure may sound draconian but so far no unintended evacuations have taken place. Any VA message will have priority over any train announcement.

Providing the SystemWith such a complex system, no single supplier was capable of providing all

the elements. Network Rail competitively tendered for a management contract and system integrator, which was awarded to Babcock International. From this a number of sub contracts were let, the most significant being: » T G Baker based in Clydebank near Glasgow for acoustic design and

programming of speakers, also the construction of the main and sub node racks;

» ASL Ltd of Lewes for their Vipedia product that routes the audio signals to the speakers;

» Tannoy of Coatbridge who supplied the intelligent speakers; » Ogilvie of Stirling for cable running, power provision and overall installation; » Lanarkshire Welding for design, fabrication and installation of speaker

bracketry.

To satisfy the listed building requirements, photo montages of the speaker installation had to be produced so that the visual aspect could be agreed in advance. Testing had to be carefully managed so as not to interfere with the day-to-day running of the station but also not to disturb nearby residents at night. Complaints from some home owners, hotels and art galleries did arise and led to a consultative process being put in place from which the operating volume of the system has been constrained.

the rail engineer • July 201454

Page 55: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Testing and commissioningTo test each intelligent loudspeaker, firstly a

known frequency is injected and used to set the loudspeaker’s maximum level which is between 85 and 88dB. The loudspeaker is then equalised and balanced using ‘pink noise’ (a range of frequencies with a corrected balance to match the response of the human ear) to achieve roughly the same level of around 85dB. Following this, a repetitive drum click is broadcast to each platform at 80dB to confirm and adjust the loudspeakers’ audio delays. This ensures the announcements heard from each speaker will arrive at the human ear at the same time.

When all loudspeakers have had gain, equalisation and delays set-up, the system is tested from the audio inputs (microphones,

recorded announcements and evacuate/alert messages), these being broadcast to each zone from which volume levels are set. Lastly, sound intensity measurements are made to confirm the system’s intelligibility.

Authorised in 2012, installation work commenced in September 2013 and the system was commissioned on 28 February 2014. Getting it right was never going to be cheap but the overall project cost of £2.5 million is considered well worth it for the significant gains that have been made.

So is the new system a success? Most people will not even notice the new speaker columns so improvement can only be measured by the lack of complaints on audibility from the public. Certainly,

announcements are much clearer than before and thus, to date, the team are confident that success has been achieved.

A nice touch has been the re-use of the old equipment, the speakers going to a University Student who wants to see his study of ambionics put into practice and the amplifiers being acquired by the Strathspey heritage railway.

Thanks are expressed to the designated project engineer Andrew Warren, construction manager Gerry Welsh and project manager John McNichol, all from the Network Rail engineering group, for facilitating the visit and explaining the details of the system.

the rail engineer • July 2014 55

Page 56: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

So what are railway stations for? The answer is obvious: they are the places where you go to catch or get off trains. For many this is true; cold,

draughty platforms that are not nice to hang around on - especially if trains are delayed.

In the remoter locations, stations are unstaffed with lack of information on train services except perhaps for a printed timetable.

But is this perception really fair, when so much has gone on in recent years to brighten up station environments, provide better information and maybe a place for shops and cafes?

The improvements have been largely piecemeal and brought about by Train Operating Companies and local community initiatives. You will not find a national specification setting out what a station should provide. Upgrades have not been integrated to take advantage of modern technology and the opportunities that could result.

However, this uncoordinated approach may be about to change under a new banner of ‘Stations as a Service’. A recent seminar hosted by the Rail Safety & Standards Board and Cisco brought together the various interested parties to discuss how new facilities and usage will be progressed.

Project BackgroundInnovation is the buzz word of this decade and several

initiatives are underway to both steer and fund foreseen opportunities. One such goes under the ‘Catapult’ banner, with a number of topics being considered. Catapult aims

to bridge the gap between government, academia and industry such that the best brains available can focus on a designated problem.

Co-funded by the Technology Strategy Board and RSSB, Stations as a Service is intent on looking at the whole operation of stations, what they do well, what could be done better and what opportunities could emerge. Topics are numerous and wide ranging: » Interchanges » Impact of disruption » Seamless journey with modal interchange » Personalised information » Use of transport information to improve network

performance » End to end mobility » Integrating quality of life with city based economic

benefits » Whole journey accessibility » Systems approach to investment » Seamless freight.These can involve many railway disciplines but all are

seen as having some impact on station facilities, operation and management. The ongoing scenario needs also to take into account climate change, the growing population, urbanisation, mobile technology, social and sharing trends, and ownership replacement with service provision.

CLIVE KESSELL

Stations as a Service

the rail engineer • July 201456

Page 57: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Constituents, Participation and ObjectivesStations as a Service (StaaS) is one of seven projects going forward under

the ‘Enabling the Digital Railway’ collaborative approach and is a consortium of four project partners and several industry observers. Cisco is leading the project and will drive the futuristic IT vision, while systems integrator Telent will facilitate the trial modelling and mock ups. Several TOCs are involved, as is Network Rail, RSSB and a number of private companies. Opportunities will exist for small and medium sized companies to participate as the project gathers momentum.

The project has four main headings spelt out by Cisco’s managing director for the public sector, Rod Halstead: security, operations, retail and the passenger experience. Information technology is very much part of all these and the IT world of today has come about only in the last twenty years. Part of StaaS will take account of the huge increase in smartphone usage - around 74% of the UK population now has one.

In more specific terms, Felix Gerdes, the Cisco business development manager for rail and mass transit, set out the objectives from three perspectives.

The IT and industry perception is that retail opportunities in stations are poorly delivered and ready for a re-think. Assets can be remotely monitored and managed by taking advantage of greater standardisation in IT. There should be improved integration of smaller station groups and the removal of split responsibilities at stations.

The TOCs’ view mirrors this to some extent. They are interested in ways to use stations more effectively, to increase the time spent by travellers in retail areas while, at the same time, reducing the risk of accidents and overcrowding. There is also a need to focus on what to do during disruption with the provision of better information.

Network Rail, which manages most of the very large stations, has similar views but, because of the potential for larger crowds, has some additional requirements. These are promoting a richer traveller experience, making enhancing capacity and traveller management, improving transit times for passengers, increasing operational efficiency and finding ways to monetise the facilities.

A more contentious vision is to move from replacing products with service provision. To illustrate this, in the airline business, jet engines are often leased on the basis of hours of thrust rather than directly owned. Service does, however, mean being able to connect things and station infrastructure needs to be controlled and delivered as a managed service. This may well emerge by creating standards that allow for station information services and retailer needs to be provided by a single IP based protocol. Due notice will need to be taken of legislation such as disability requirements, and the effectiveness of trials will mean putting in place a constant feedback loop.

Trial sites and the need for cautionAs Stephen Goodman from Cisco commented: “No plan survives the first

contact with the enemy”. Whilst there is no real enemy here, there will be many false starts and lessons to be learned. So how to take this forward?

In conjunction with Abellio Greater Anglia, three stations have been chosen as a trial: one large (Liverpool Street), one medium (Colchester) and one small (Ingatestone). All of these have multiple dissimilar systems and networks. A starting premise is that nothing must affect the safe operation of trains and anything new will not replace existing systems at this stage. A local station based management automation system will then support: » Public and staff WiFi, noting that passengers are often better informed

than staff; » Location based services including WiFi connection between platforms if

cable routes are unavailable or difficult to access; » CCTV with local archiving; » Fire alarm and safety systems, VA/PA; » Voice communications and help points; » Interactive customer service signage; » Ticket machines and gates.All facilities will be connected together on a centralised network and

monitored initially from the Telent office in Warwick. Due cognisance will be taken of the 25kV electrification and any adverse effects from interference and pantograph sparks.

The TOC reactionWhilst welcoming the initiative, Mike Kean from Abellio spelt out some

factors that will need longer-term consideration. A franchise still typically lasts only seven years and it is hard to get a payback in that period. Network Rail, as the station owner, is only obliged to maintain the sites and not improve them. As such, lease arrangements are complex.

For smaller stations such as Ingatestone that are often unstaffed for periods of the day, safety is important but managing cost is often dominant over service quality. Making these stations part of the community, maybe using the building as a public communications centre, will be welcomed. Beware also of listed buildings and the limitations this can mean.

Medium stations like Colchester invariably have many legacy systems but need to develop as a transport partnership with buses, taxis, bike hire and car parking. Longer dwell times for people may result from this thus enhancing retail opportunities.

A large station like Liverpool St often has multi-TOC usage, all being tenants of Network Rail. Passenger service and support is dominant with dwell time being the biggest problem when major disruption occurs. Staffing cost splits between Network Rail and TOCs can cause disputes on the number of staff required.

the rail engineer • July 2014 57

Page 58: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Technical challengesThe StaaS project will need to show that

associated equipment and system architecture is robust. Peter Felton from Telent described it as ‘the internet of things’; the crunching of data is not difficult, joining it together is the main challenge and will be the main focus for StaaS.

Video evidence for security problems such as vandalism, theft of luggage and third party issues, is very much part of station management obligations but this will be enhanced by mobile access to station CCTV monitoring.

Getting information out to travellers in advance of arriving at the station by use of social media will become the norm. Maximising IT to give information when all stations on a line of route are likely to be affected is another objective, as is collective gathering of data for alarms and asset management.

Whilst retail outlets have expanded over the past ten years, these tend to be only at larger stations. Opportunities at smaller sites are as yet untapped: a ‘click and collect’ service to save the tired commuter a shopping expedition at the end of a long day could be worth trying, although there would be staffing implications. Maybe retail staff could be doubly employed as a visual presence for aiding station security?

Incident management and physical security are issues where faster access to knowledge can be all important. The firm Workware Systems believes that the impact of the mobile tablet could be vital

for police officers called to deal with a problem. A video picture of what is currently happening will enable data to be gathered in quick time which can be used to both decide what action needs taking as well as providing future evidence.

Going forwardIt would be all too easy to think that the present

situation is all wrong. Stations like St Pancras, Kings Cross, Manchester Piccadilly, Nottingham and the ongoing work at Birmingham New Street and London Bridge can transform the station experience. There is much to commend this new initiative but part of the task must be to analyse what is being done to improve stations as part of other projects, and not seek to replace these just for the sake of it.

Very few of the listed features are entirely new; most exist today but as isolated systems. Joining them up into a new ‘single platform’ operation

is the important part of the vision. The use of IP based communication is a natural technology progression but even this must be considered in conjunction with other projects.

The Traffic Management System deployment has, as a spin off, the improvement of train service information at stations, possibly by graphic displays to the public. Getting similar information onboard trains is a follow on from this.

The upgrade of Network Rail’s FTN to offer a nationwide IP service will surely have an impact on how StaaS evolves. Above all, it will be about re-educating the public on rail station expectations and this will only be possible when the early trials of StaaS have been measured, analysed and updated in the light of experience.

Watching what happens at Liverpool St, Colchester and Ingatestone will be an interesting exercise.

the rail engineer • July 201458

Page 59: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

OK

Prepared by The Production Arts Studio | Goodby Silverstein & Partners. All rights reserved. 415.392.0669

Released on 01.23.14Printed at 100% Round 2

ClientJob NumberAd Number

Ad-IDJob Title

File NameFile FormatStart Date

Color /MediaMaterials Due

1st InsertionVendor

Pubs

BTLGS

PeopleCreative Director

Assoc. Creative DirectorArt DirectorCopywriterCopyeditor

Account ManagementAccount / Operations

Print / Int. ProducerArt Producer

Product SpecialistLegal

Production Arts Studio

Mechanical SpecsCisco PrintCISGEN041P016WO-90The Internet of Everything...Print Manifesto Page AdCISCOGEN0041P06_WO-90_Manifesto Print Ad_7.875x10.5.inddAdobe InDesign CS61-23-2014 9:06 AM4/C Magmm.dd.yymm.dd.yyDMAXGlobal usage

8.25” x 10.75”7.875” x 10.5”7” x 9.4375”None1” = 1”

None Notes

Jon RandazzoShane Flemming/Bee ReynoldsNoneNoneRyan M. / Jeff P. / Bob G.Stephanie AmosLiz ClarkDan SouthwickNoneNone

Kirsten Finkas @ 1-23-2014 9:06 AM

Homes know when to turn up the heat.Shopping carts handle checkout. Pill bottlesorder their own refills.

In the next decade, the Internet of Everythingwill discover cures, save species and unlock$19 trillion in potential opportunity.

But it won’t happen with last year’s ragtagsolutions and competing systems.

The Internet of Everything will requirebusinesses to achieve a new kind of IT,IT that is fast, simple and utterly secure.

And when it works, streetlights will preventcrime. Clothing will detect fevers. Factorieswill react to markets in real time.

The Internet of Everything is changing everything. And one company is making it possible. #InternetofEverything

The Internet of Everythingis changing everything.Yes, everything.

©2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

S:7”

S:9.4375”T:7.875”

T:10.5”B:8.25”

B:10.75”

H21157_1c_Global_Apg.indd01.28.2014EpsonMF

H21157x01C_mag_3u.tif

80 70 70 10010.2 7.4 7.4 100 100 100100 100 60 100 100 70 70 30 30 100 100 60 100 100 100 10070 70 30 30 100 100 60 70 70 4070 70 30 30 100 40 100 40 40 100 10 40 40 20 70 70 3.1 2.2 2.270 40 40 75 66 6650 40 4025 19 19B 0 0 0 0

100 70 30 100 10 25 50 75 90 100100 60 100 70 30 100 60 40 70 4070 30 100 40 40 100 40 100 40 70 40 70 40 40 340 70 40 70 40 40100 60A

3%ISO 12647-7 Digital Control Strip 2009

Manifesto_Global_PgAd_A4.indd 1 30/06/2014 14:07

Page 60: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

the rail engineer • July 201460

Page 61: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Video developments in NottinghamWith the coming of the smartphone, video is as commonplace

today as audio was in the past. The constant availability of images has created new techniques and uses that would

have never been dreamed possible in years gone by. Many industries depend on video for the efficient and safe operation of their business, with rail having applications in both main line and light rail operations.

CCTV for security surveillance purposes has been around for many years, but the effectiveness of the technology has not always produced the anticipated results. Control rooms trying to monitor poor quality pictures often meant vital incidents were missed. Even when images have been recorded, the limited recording systems could only produce grainy and jumpy pictures, hardly beneficial when assessing the aftermath of an incident.

CLIVE KESSELL

the rail engineer • July 2014 61

Page 62: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Improving the product can come about in surprising ways. One firm that has capitalised on technology advancements is the Inside Out Group, based in Nottingham. Its origins go back to an underwater camera development to photograph the underside of Koi Carp fish, which can often be diseased despite appearing normal when viewed from above.

A business downturn for the company involved led to its acquisition by Inside Out Security Ltd, which was already established in the provision of security guards and security maintenance services and was seeking to expand into other aspects of the security industry. Video imaging and CCTV was the logical result and so Inside Out Technical Security Ltd was formed.

Time Lapse ProductionsCapturing an event on camera

and transferring images into a video production can be useful for many purposes. It may be to watch the progress of work, it could be to study any safety or security incident, or it is often to publicise a job well done as part of a promotional campaign. If the event is of long duration, using time lapse photography can communicate how the project evolves and showcase what is achieved during that time.

Any eye catching, high-quality film creation can be an effective marketing tool for any organisation. Inside Out Time Lapse Productions has achieved this by mixing video and static pictures and adding background music to the eventual production. Static time lapse, along with ‘on the ground’ filming to capture detail, adds variety to the production.

Not only has this required the development of new time lapse

software and systems, but it needs a team with artistic creativity to produce the finished result. Several such films have been made, but one that has achieved universal praise is the construction work on the Nottingham tram extension (NET Phase Two) and the rolling in of the bridges over and close to the main railway station. The result has a certain ‘wow’ factor and does much to promote both the project and the engineering aspects.

Time lapse photography has come on in leaps and bounds, and the days of visiting the camera on a regular basis to recover footage are long gone. The team at Inside Out has developed a finely-tuned system which uses modern 3G and 4G radio networks to send footage day and night to their company servers where it can be monitored and edited. To put their minds at ease, they also included GPS into their systems should the camera go amiss and to allow them to plot their cameras’ comings and going around the world.

Monitoring Nottingham tramsThe Nottingham Express Transit

(NET) tram network has been in service since 2004 with a route from the main railway station through the city centre to two destinations on the north side of the city. So successful has this been that a further two extension lines are under construction

the rail engineer • July 201462

Page 63: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Tel: + 44 (0) 1920 860600Fax: + 44 (0) 1920 485915Web: www.cuphosco.com

Email: [email protected]

For over 90 years CU Phosco Lighting has been the leader in British exterior lighting manufacturing. Offering a complete solution for your rail lighting requirements our Network Rail approved contracting team will manage your project from initial survey, lighting design, specifi cation details and drawings, project management, installation and maintenance. CU Phosco Lighting offer a range of products from lighting columns, mid hinged columns and high masts. Specialist level crossing lighting columns and luminaires are also available.

CU Phosco Lighting is committed to helping customers achieve their energy and carbon emission reduction requirements. CU Phosco Lighting manufacture Quality Assured British products whilst incorporating innovative technology including the latest LED lighting systems for fl oodlighting, amenity, heritage car park, road and footpaths. We can also provide Central Management Systems to control and further reduce energy costs from platform to storage depot lighting.

Specialists in Rail Lighting

(Lines 2 and 3) to Beeston in the west and across the River Trent to Clifton in the south. These come into service later in 2014 with the need to provide surveillance of the new routes being vital.

Due to the relationship which had developed from the film productions area of work, Inside Out Technical Security Ltd were invited to tender for the CCTV installation contract. This was awarded in February 2014, the project being let as a sub from the main contractor Vinci Construction. The requirement is the provision of 141 cameras to cover the 28 new stations, 7 substations and 26 road junctions.

The hardware that Inside Out selected is the Endura system, manufactured by Pelco (part of the Schneider group) from Clovis in California. All cameras have pan, tilt and zoom capabilities and operate over a fibre IP (Internet Protocol) network. Pelco Endura was chosen over its competitors as its video management system (VMS) is ideal for mission-critical operations. The Tram contract requires around the clock monitoring and the Endura system is both reliable and dependable.

Two high-definition IP cameras will monitor each station, primarily the ticket vending machine and passenger help point. Cameras will predominantly be mounted on poles and powered from a local supply provided by Alstom.

Recording eventsA key requirement of the contract is the continuous recording of all that

takes place on the network. The logistics of this are staggering; with 141 cameras operating at 25 frames per second, the amount of storage space needed for 24/7 recording equates to 513 terabytes.

The recording equipment is located at the central control point and is capable of storing 30 days worth of data. Even managing this is a challenge and since the contract only requires 14 days, after that time the number of frames stored is reduced by discarding ‘non event’ pictures. All recordings will have a

the rail engineer • July 2014 63

Page 64: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

date and time marker as looking for a particular incident amongst all that data will be quite a task.

Controlling the surveillanceThe NET tram system has its main

control centre at Wilkinson Street from where tram operations are managed. For CCTV surveillance, a video wall of twelve 55” monitors is being provided, each having a split screen capability so that many pictures can be portrayed simultaneously to the control room staff. The TV monitoring equipment will be entirely new and has to have a capability of displaying the existing analogue cameras on Line 1.

The four operators who control the tram movements will each have a desk screen on which selected TV pictures can be shown. Should an alarm be set off at any station, the camera monitoring that location will automatically have its picture displayed to the appropriate operator position. Control of individual camera operation will be by a joystick.

In addition, a ‘back row’ desk for two system managers will also have monitor screens but will be given more facilities to view any unusual incidents.

Two satellite control rooms - one

at the Clifton Park & Ride site, the other at Loxley House from where the Nottingham city road network is monitored - will be linked to the NET CCTV system with the associated staff given viewing rights.

One critical factor for Inside Out is that the CCTV provision work has to take place after virtually everything else associated with the extension lines has been installed. This puts them on the critical path and, to ensure minimum risk, the system is being set up in the Nottingham premises so that configuration testing can take place offline as far as possible. Training the operators will also be necessary and the policy being adopted is to train the trainers, whence NET will be self-sufficient.

Much will be written on the expanded NET network once the new lines are in service, but it is interesting at this stage to get a slant on one of the smaller elements of the overall project. The future CCTV operation and particularly its IP networking design, may signal a step change in technology for similar projects elsewhere.

Thanks are expressed to Donna Bickley, Simon Glover and Tony Hoffman for allowing the visit to the Inside Out Group offices and explaining the company’s activities. The Nottingham Tram video can be seen on the NET website and also at www.iotimelapse.co.uk

the rail engineer • July 201464

Page 65: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

www.jacobs.com

More than just a jobOur global team of over 70,000 professionals have careers that take them places. Where can your career take you?

We have vacancies at all levels across

all Rail disciplines at our offices around

the UK, working on some of the most

interesting and challenging programmes.

If you would like to develop your

career at one of the world’s largest and

most diverse providers of technical

professional services please contact us

at [email protected] or visit

www.jacobs.com/careers to find out

more about what we can do for you.

Jacobs is an equal opportunities employer and is committed to the safety and well-being of all.

Page 66: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Internet

Not just a futuristic concept, the quaintly-named ‘Internet of Things’ (IoT) is the network of uniquely-identified physical objects which can be accessed through the Internet - usually using cloud-based

technology. This offers real opportunities to take the management of transport networks such as London Underground to a new level by introducing connectivity, data collection and intelligence into the traditional management systems behind such businesses, then making use of smart devices and user-friendly platforms in order to control them.

Applying this technology can improve the efficiency of work carried out on transport networks. It is no longer a question of monitoring objects and fixing them when they go wrong. Now, collecting real-time information and intelligence allows their behaviour to be predicted so they get fixed before they have a chance to fail. These improvements improve reliability, service availability and cost effectiveness.

Cloud technology makes this possible by removing the need for localised processing and data storage, significantly reducing costs and enabling the data to be accessible from anywhere. Any number of assets are connected and managed, cheaply and quickly, via a pre-designed interface, thus creating an Internet of Things for the rail environment.

Introducing new technologyThe development and application

of sensors to monitor asset performance at a component level has paved the way, with companies such as technology services provider Telent already managing and often maintaining system elements

remotely. Now, the ability to collect and store performance data, then analyse it and use it intelligently to predict, prevent and minimise the impact of equipment degradation, changes the way in which ever-more-efficient maintenance is carried out.

Microsoft has recognised the progress that Telent is making in the tangible application of these technologies and has identified work for London Underground as a great opportunity to bring its Azure Intelligent Systems Service to the market.

Steve Pears, managing director of Telent Rail, explains: “Our initial work with the Internet of Things started as part of our asset management work, which we carry out across the UK rail industry. Our customers want to run trains and they want the travelling public to be well informed during their journeys. They use us to provide, monitor and maintain the systems that inform, such as train times, public address and CCTV, and also to help them keep vital assets, such as lifts and escalators, operating.

“We were contracted by London Underground to update station information systems. As this was a

‘whole life’ contract, we were also to be responsible for maintaining the new assets as well as providing year on year efficiencies.”

This set the scene for a new approach which Telent has since taken into other rail contracts, including those with train operating companies. Many of the systems are IP based, connected by customers’ WANs (wide area networks) and using these secure systems to monitor the status of devices.

A modest startThe project started with customer

information and public address systems using some fairly basic tools. However, the benefit of being able to remotely monitor the status of these systems was quickly realised. Some of the assets are in difficult locations so being able to locate faults accurately and quickly and then arriving with the correct tools, spares and access equipment is crucial.

“Initially, we were using the Internet of Things to drive efficiencies in our maintenance organisation and to

of All Things Rail

Thethe rail engineer • July 201466

Page 67: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

help our customers mobilise the right organisation to get a first time fix,” Steve Pears continued. “Since then, we have continued to develop our monitoring and control skills. This has included giving our customers the capability to carry out remote monitoring via their PC, or on the move using a tablet.

“We have also extended the range of assets that we monitor. For example, just before the 2012 Olympics, London Underground wanted to ensure the best reliability of their lifts, particularly important during the Paralympics. Together, we used a variety of communications channels and added IP-connected Remote Terminal Units (RTUs) to monitor the critical parameters. This was a collaborative development - we provided the communications and monitoring skills and London Underground had the asset knowledge. This was a great success with excellent availability of these lifts throughout the games and since.”

Together, the two companies then embarked on further extending this approach by monitoring the status of escalators, control rooms and gathering data for the ‘cooling the tube’

programme. The consistent theme is that the availability of this data gathered from the Internet of Things drives performance improvements, assets are more available and maintenance costs are lowered.

Obvious benefitsOver the last two years, Telent

has implemented asset-monitoring systems to deliver real-time feedback on key parameters that can affect asset performance. For example, monitoring the vibration on escalators to look for an increasing trend which can indicate a potential failure. By alerting maintenance staff early, the status can be checked and rectified overnight resulting in reduced down time during service hours.

Increasingly, frontline staff are using tablets and mobile devices to respond effectively to alerts on site. Deploying Microsoft embedded technology in data gathering agents has provided an open extensible platform with a fast development cycle that can be supported long term.

Looking to the future, the next stage of development will focus on two key areas; prognostic assessment and

enterprise integration. The vision is to have a system that defines the remaining useful life of an asset and integrates this knowledge seamlessly into the enterprise. Using web and mobile delivered data will enable operations and maintenance teams to see in real-time the detailed performance of their critical assets.

What is the overall impact today? Steve Pears is clear: “We are able to provide a more efficient service. We have cut costs. The assets we maintain and monitor have higher availability for supporting the travelling public. It takes less time to fix something that is broken and many of those things can often be fixed before they even fail.”

Imagine you

…that could have

tiny changes…

bigCall 0800 783 7761 www.telent.com

Asset Condition Monitoring ■ measure ■ monitor ■ predict ■ prevent ■ save

consequences

could detect the

...at telent we can

Telent 184x122 HP ad print.indd 2 23/06/2014 11:28

the rail engineer • July 2014 67

Page 68: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

How can rolling stock wheel diameter and profile be assessed quickly and accurately without removal of the wheelset? Tools have been available for some time for mapping the profile, but it’s a skilled job that takes time. Measuring the diameter has long been a problem, but now a new device

is being used in UK depots that allows both of these important tasks to be accomplished in seconds - and it can do a lot more besides.

‘The power of 3,’ says the publicity strapline. ‘Behind the three laser lines lies the secret of Calipri.’ So what

is Calipri and how does it work? The name didn’t give much away to your writer, and what’s this about three

lasers? Well, lasers can be used to measure, so maybe it’s measuring in threes?

Of course - three dimensions! Measure the curvature of a circle and you can calculate its diameter. Design a device that can make that measurement from any angle and the result would be a rather useful tool. In developing Calipri, Austrian company NextSense GmbH has done precisely that.

Hot measurementBased in Graz, NextSense produces a wide range

of laser-based profile measurement devices for the automotive and steel industries. Being able to measure hot metal by using non-contact techniques is clearly advantageous! The development of those techniques for problem solving within the rail industry has been a logical step.

It was logical, too, that Mechan Limited should become the UK distributor for Calipri. Known worldwide for its range of vehicle lifting jacks, wheel and bogie drops and

bogie testing machines, Mechan is keen to take on new products to complement its existing business.

Calipri is a truly portable laser scanner. For most applications, the sensor device can be hand held with the collected data being stored on a tablet PC that’s carried on a comfortable body strap. The gathered information can be downloaded at the end of the testing plan and software packages can be used to analyse and store the data.

Quick profilesWheel profile measurement is a key part of the

wheelset inspection process and, by using Calipri, it can be accomplished within a few seconds. A testing plan that identifies the vehicle, the wheel profile type and wheelset identity is set up on the tablet PC and the sensor is then pointed at the wheel rim. The three central laser lines projected by the scanner can be seen on the wheel and the scanner is positioned so that these lines also intersect the centre of the wheel. Guiding the sensor in an arc around the wheel profile allows the required information to be gathered. Audible prompts and a visual display on the sensor head make this guiding process straightforward.

The power of 3

Stuart Marsh

the rail engineer • July 201468

Page 69: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Measuring each wheel takes around 10 seconds, which is fast when compared to contact type measuring techniques. The small wheels associated with low floor tram vehicles are notoriously difficult to access, so a smaller version of the Calipri sensor head is available for this purpose.

Accuracy of measurement is not reliant upon operator skill. The user moves the sensor by hand over the object to be measured and the image processing system combines segments obtained from various viewing directions. In this way the measurements are free of operator influences. The results are shown on the sensor display, as well as on the tablet PC and comparisons can be made with the standard wheel profile.

Although the system cannot by itself locate wheel defects such as wheel tread flats or surface spalls, it can be used to assess the severity of such damage. This measurement module can also be used in the wheel shop to determine the correct depth of cut required for re-profiling.

Worried about wear?It doesn’t stop at wheel profiles.

Calipri is a multi-functional profile measurement device. By means of a modular concept it can also be used to measure wheel diameter, back-to-backs and brake disc wear.

In each of these cases the module package includes the necessary software and supplementary gauges. When measuring brake disc wear, for instance, a small magnetic

gauge can be attached to the edge of the disc. The laser scans the gauge and brake disc simultaneously, with the gauge providing a reference of known width. This allows the software included with the module to calculate the disc thickness and degree of hollowness of the disc faces.

The diameter of a rail vehicle wheel is a critical wear parameter and the Calipri wheel diameter

Wheel Profile Brake Disc Wheel Diameter Back-to-Back Rails including Grooved Switches Rail Geometry Defects

CALIPRI MULTIFUNCTIONAL PROFILE MEASUREMENT

[email protected] www.mechan.co.uk+44 (0)114 257 0563

the rail engineer • July 2014 69

Page 70: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

module can be used to measure it very accurately. A carbon fibre gauge is attached to the wheel. The size of the gauge has to be selected according to the nominal diameter of the wheel to be measured - three gauge sizes are available.

Two placement cylinders have to touch the rolling circle anywhere on its circumference and a magnet is switched on to retain the gauge in position. The gauge has two measurement cylinders that act as reference points and these are scanned by the three laser lines at the same time as the wheel tread. If the wheel profile has been recorded, the software can then calculate the diameter of the rolling circle.

The ovality and eccentricity of rail vehicle wheels (radial and axial runout) can also be assessed. Again, these are key maintenance tests that can be undertaken quickly using the appropriate Calipri module. A magnetic wedge is attached to the inside of the wheel flange and the laser scanner is supported on a tripod stand. As the wheel is rotated the trigger wedge provides the start and end reference points for the scan. Once the wheel rotation test is completed, graphs can be displayed to show the degree of axial and radial runout.

Back-to-back (wheel clearance) measurements are also very simple using Calipri. A two-part telescopic gauge is placed on the rails and then extended so that contact points on the gauge meet the back of each wheel flange. The sensor is then used to scan two reference cylinders on the gauge and the software can then calculate the wheelset back-to-back measurement.

Infrastructure tooAs well as wheelset

measurements, Calipri can be used in the analysis of rail and switch profiles. The procedure is very similar to the technique used for measuring wheel profile. Comparison with standard rail profiles contained within the software gives a very accurate indication of rail wear.

When particularly accurate measurements are required, a geometry module can be clamped to the rail, guaranteeing the measurement of an exactly defined cross section, including conic objects such as crossings and switch rails.

Two software packages are available - ‘Analyzer’ for extended analysis of the recorded profile curve and ‘Explorer’ for

more detailed processing of downloaded data. Analyzer allows a profile to be visualised, measured and compared with the relevant standard reference profile. Explorer takes things further by providing structured management, storage and analysis of measurement data.

Wear limits, tolerances and historical runs are documented. This allows the remaining life of an asset to be predicted and maintenance intervals to be tailored accordingly. NextSense can also provide powerful ‘Wheel-Rail analysis’ software that can be used to examine in great detail the wheel/rail kinematics and evaluate wear parameters.

Calipri has been exported by NextSense to many rail operators throughout the world. It has been formally approved by DB in Germany and by OBB in Austria, where it will be used at all depots. SNCF too will use Calipri throughout France.

In the UK, Calipri is now in use with South Eastern Trains, Siemens and Bombardier. Network Rail also has one system for assessing its on-track plant and the RAIB also has two systems, together with a suite of Vampire modelling software.

the rail engineer • July 201470

Page 71: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Delivering whole life, end-to-end asset lifecycle solutionsAs one of the UK’s leading engineering solutions providers, we specialise in technical delivery, innovative expertise and sustainable solutions.

We are engineering tomorrow today, through more innovative products and services that will shorten lead times, enhance the quality of project delivery and, above all, provide cost-effective solutions.

We bring our extensive knowledge and experience to deliver value to our customers’ assets across all phases of the project lifecycle:

Advisory and design Complex programme management Operations and maintenance

Speak to our Rail team today

01628 842444

www.costain.comScan here to discover why

you should choose Costain

0457 Mackenzie Rail Sector Magazine Ad.indd 1 14/04/2014 09:53

Page 72: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

DAVID SHIRRES

DMU energy

breakthrough

the rail engineer • July 201472

Page 73: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

At 100 mph, the energy in a 133 tonne three-car Class 170 DMU is 133 Megajoules (MJ). Braking the train from this speed to a stop in two minutes is equivalent to powering 1,100 one kilowatt electric fires over this period. It is therefore not surprising that a study of the

stopping service between Edinburgh and Dunblane (ten stops over 42 miles) showed that braking losses accounted for 52% of the energy use. A further 16% was lost due to transmission slippage during initial acceleration, a significant factor for stopping services.

To reduce these losses Ricardo, Artemis Intelligent Power and Bombardier are working collaboratively on an innovative project named ‘DDflyTrain’ in which each contributes their technology and expertise. With such large potential fuel savings on offer, The Rail Engineer was keen to learn more.

Using braking energyRecovering energy lost during train braking is

not a new idea. In 1903, the trams at Devonport used the Raworth system of regenerative control to use energy generated from braking to power other trams on the system. In 1933, the newly-electrified Transcaucasus Railway used regenerative braking to retard trains on their descent from the 949-metre-high Surami Pass.

Regenerative braking in the UK dates back to 1954 when it was used on the Manchester to Sheffield line through Woodhead tunnel which was electrified at 1,500V DC. Descending coal trains on this steeply-graded line provided power to other trains climbing to the summit.

For DC electrification, it is relatively straightforward to feed power from retardation back into the supply as this only requires the retardation voltage to exceed that of the supply. For AC electrification, regenerative braking is a relatively recent development as there is also the requirement to synchronise phases. With modern

electronics, regenerative braking now features on almost all electric traction.

In contrast, regenerative braking of diesel powered trains is almost unheard of. With no external power supply to accept the energy from braking, re-use of this energy requires rapid on-train storage of large amounts of energy whilst the train brakes. Although batteries could store this amount of energy, they can only charge at a slow rate. In contrast, super capacitors can accept energy at a high rate but have a low storage capacity. This would seem to rule out electrical storage.

If re-use of braking energy is to be a practical proposition for diesel trains, a new technology is required. A recent innovative project has shown that flywheels could well provide the answer. A further advantage is that, unlike batteries, the cost of additional energy storage using flywheels does not scale with capacity. For example, doubling the capacity increases cost by a factor of 0.3.

The 60,000rpm FlywheelFlywheels are not a new rail technology.

Indeed, Richard Trevithick’s single cylinder steam locomotive of 1804 had an 8ft diameter flywheel to ensure that it would not stall. More recently, the Class 139 Parry People Mover, introduced in 2006, uses an 86hp diesel engine to charge a 500 kg flywheel of one metre diameter rotating at maximum speed of 2,500 rpm. This demonstrated that it was possible to carry 50 people for 15 miles on one gallon of fuel, compared with two miles for a conventional DMU.

The Class 139 is a lightweight vehicle weighing 12 tons with a maximum speed of 40 mph at which its energy would be 1.9MJ as compared with 133MJ for a class 170 at 100 mph. So, whilst the Class 139 shows how a flywheel can be successfully used on lightweight vehicles, a different solution is needed for conventional DMUs.

In 1915, Sir Harry Ricardo established Engine Patents Ltd specialising in automotive innovation. The company is now known simply as Ricardo, and one such innovation is its flywheel technology which has now been used on Formula One cars, buses and excavators (to recover energy as the load drops). Such applications require relatively small, high-speed flywheels. With stored energy being proportional to speed squared, a flywheel spinning at 60,000rpm can store a significant amount of energy.

Such flywheels require Ricardo’s advanced bearing technology and need to operate in a vacuum to minimise losses. This would normally require seals and a vacuum management system. The Ricardo system avoids this through the use of a magnetic drive through the vacuum chamber wall. A magnetic field couples permanent magnets in the flywheel shaft to those in the outer rotor through static pole pieces in the vacuum chamber wall.

This drive is the result of a seven-year development programme. It is more efficient than a mechanical drive and also provides a useful gear reduction making the output shaft speed one sixth that of the flywheel. It is comparable in concept to an epicyclic gearbox with the pole pieces acting as planet gears.

DMU Energy LossesEdinburgh to Dunblane

Rolling Resistance

Drag

Transmission

Alternator Losses

Braking

11%

16%

16%

5%

52%

Table 1 Typical properties of Energy Storage Technologies

Energy Storage (Watt hours per kg)

Rate of energy transfer (Watts per kg)

Lithium Ion Battery 175 L300

Nickel Metal Hydride Battery

90 600

Supercapacitor 20 3500

Flywheel 120 5000

Ricardo flywheel.

the rail engineer • July 2014 73

Page 74: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Effic

ienc

y [%

]100%

50%

0

0 100020 mph

TC slip mode Fluid coupling

2000 3000

Speed [rpm]

Digital DisplacementCurrent DMU transmissions suffer from significant

energy losses. The study that highlighted a 52% loss from braking also showed transmission losses of 16%. Current DMU transmissions have two-stages: a fluid flywheel which allows slippage as the engine accelerates, and a fluid coupling to provide a fixed drive. As a result, mean efficiency during acceleration to 20 mph is around 30%. Such low efficiency would not be acceptable for a flywheel system that recovers energy during this initial acceleration.

The solution to this problem is provided by Artemis Intelligent Power, a company created at the University of Edinburgh in 1994. The company specialises in innovative projects for its Digital Displacement® technology which is based on concepts that were originally developed by the University’s Fluid Power group. In 2009 it was overall winner of the Carbon Trust Innovation Award in recognition of the benefits of its technology to wind turbines and to transport. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries also recognised these benefits and acquired Artemis in 2010.

In a Digital Displacement® pump of, say, six cylinders, each cylinder’s low pressure poppet valves remains open throughout the cycle unless activated by a solenoid. At idle, the cylinder valve remains open and oil flows freely through the pump with minimal energy consumption. At low power, solenoids for one or two cylinders are activated by the digital output of the pump’s controller. These cylinders operate at full efficiency whilst other cylinders idle. All solenoids are activated at full power, at which time a Digital Displacement pump is over 90% efficient.

Where to put it?The third company involved in the DDflyTrain

project is Bombardier, which has the task of ensuring that this novel technology can be successfully retrofitted to a DMU. This includes compliance with all relevant standards, a mechanical interface for energy transfer and the effect of shock and vibration. For this, an RSSB publication on the vibration environment for rail mounted equipment was used to assess the best orientation of flywheel spin axis. Systems integration also needs to consider how the DDflyTrain’s braking and power is blended into existing control systems. To avoid taking vehicles out of service, the energy recovery system is designed to enable individual component parts to be progressively fitted overnight.

Simulations, vehicle space constraints and cost benefit analysis has shown that the optimum power train transmission is 2 x 4.5 MJ flywheel units each with its own Artemis pump/motor coupled to a single pump/motor that drives the main transmission. One reason for this is that containment of two 4.5 MJ units is more practical than a single 9 MJ unit. The 4.5 MJ flywheel has an outside diameter of 0.28 metres, mass of 21 kg and spins at up to 45,000 rpm.

Digital Displacement Pump

the rail engineer • July 201474

Page 75: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Testing and Certification At Artemis’s Edinburgh test lab, a test rig for

the DDflyTrain will soon be operation which will enable the energy recovery system to be tested under all simulated operating conditions. This will test how the Ricardo flywheel and Artemis pump/motor operate together and will measure round-trip efficiency to validate the system’s business model. With experience from this testing, it is intended that a prototype will be fitted to a DMU in 2015. After a year’s trial, the intention is for fleet introduction in 2017.

The safety review process is being led by Bombardier and has been discussed with the Office of Rail Regulation. A key aspect is proving the flywheel, which is made of filament-wound carbon fibre, to be safe if it fails. Ricardo’s experience is that its failure mode is de-lamination resulting in rapid but progressive deceleration as candyfloss-like material rubs the chamber wall.

To test for other failure modes, flywheels will be proof tested to 90,000 rpm and subject to destructive testing. In addition, for the foreseeable future, full containment will be provided in the form of a steel cylinder with ‘horse shoe’ cross section that can spin on its own bearings to dissipate energy. This is a significant design constraint.

The prizeThe benefits of the DDflyTrain depend on the

mode of operation and frequency of stops. If the flywheel only is used for initial acceleration, less fuel is used, creating less noise and vehicle emissions. Alternatively, simultaneous use of engine and flywheel power could give a DMU an initial acceleration comparable to an EMU with consequent journey time savings. In addition to commercial benefits, this could free up capacity on electrified lines and might enable a particular service to be operated with fewer trains.

In fuel-saving mode, Ricardo estimate a typical fuel saving of around 10-20% on services such as Edinburgh to Dunblane. This gives around £11,000 per vehicle per annum savings with a 4.5 year payback period for an estimated system costs of £50,000. Volume production of flywheels for rail and other application might lower this cost.

The project is developing a predictive tool to determine savings for a particular train service to assess the system’s payback for any train service which will be validated as part of the testing regime.

Whether used to speed up trains or save fuel DDflyTrain is a potential game-changer offering significant savings that could transform the economics of DMU operation.

Innovation by match makingThe collaboration between Bombardier,

Artemis and Ricardo to develop their DDflyTrain could ultimately make regenerative braking on diesel trains as ubiquitous as that on electric trains. Whilst this is an impressive story, also notable is the match-making that brought these three diverse companies together.

The Rail Engineer reported in September 2012 (issue 95) on how the Technology Strategy Board (TSB) was promoting cross-industry innovation. This included the creation of Knowledge Transfer Networks to bring together businesses,

universities and research organisations and competitions to promote specific initiatives. In 2011, the TSB announced its ‘Accelerating Innovation in Rail’ competition and prior to its launch held a ‘Consortia Building and Information Day’

In April 2012, the TSB announced that the Artemis/Ricardo/Bombardier consortium was one of the winners of this competition. Since then, much work has to be done to produce hardware that is ready for testing so that, in a few years’ time, spinning flywheels under DMUs could be delivering fuel savings worth millions. Then, if your DMU goes quiet leaving a station, you’ll know why!

the rail engineer • July 2014 75

Page 76: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

The universal column - the UC - has a lot going for it. It’s sturdy and predictable. With equal sides it doesn’t have the awkward detailing arrangements as its (generally) smaller cousin the joist, nor of its (generally) larger relative the rolled universal beam. The flanges have parallel

sides so there are no tapered washers to remember. The web is parallel and chunky and there are no pesky radii to work round. The UC was designed to stand up straight, to carry out the mundane task of taking axial loads and to be pretty stiff in the process.

It’s an example of elegant engineering design. On the railways there are tens of thousands

of them, for it is the lowly UC that forms the basis of most overhead electrification structures. Smaller ones carrying the cantilever equipment, larger ones forming the uprights of portal structures spanning many tracks.

Plain and simpleThey’ve been used over the decades because

they do the task of keeping up the power cables and all the associated paraphernalia extremely well. Remember the parallel flanges? They’re just the job for clamping or drilling. The sturdiness - excellent for being….sturdy.

And there’s the prospect of many more being installed which, if they really are that great, might cause some general rejoicing. But no, strange as it may seem for such a simple piece of steelwork, some people think they are ugly. Yes, ugly, blots on the landscape. Just downright, plain ugly, despite their sound engineering credentials.

It’s taken a little while for this to be said by the industry and for an attempt to make amends. And this is where FutureRailway (yes, just one word) comes in.

The FutureRailway programme is a collaboration between Network Rail and RSSB working with industry and the supply chain to deliver the RTS.

And the RTS - the Rail Technical Strategy - supports national policy for the development of the railway over a 30-year planning horizon.

FutureRailway manages a cross-industry research, development and innovation programme to help the innovator to navigate the complex rail industry landscape and identify the most appropriate route to market. It also supports the rail industry and its supply chain to develop long term technical strategies and to facilitate the research, development and innovation needed to deliver these strategies.

The focus is on de-risking business solutions and technologies by helping move them from research through prototype to demonstration and eventual implementation.

But why should FutureRailway bother with the Universal Column which has always done what it says on the tin - and is likely so to do for another few decades?

Time for change?With the advent of a new north-south high

speed rail link and the national rail network preparing for more electrification, now is a good time to ask whether the design of gantries and cantilever structures be made more aesthetically pleasing while at the same time making sure that engineering performance criteria are met.

FutureRailway recently teamed up with HS2 to promote a new innovation challenge through competitions organised by RIBA - the Royal Institute of British Architects - a venture which was funded by the Department for Transport.

In association with RIBA, the Enabling Innovation Team (EIT), which forms part of the Future Railway Programme, HS2 Ltd and the Department for Transport (DfT) intend to identify overhead line structure designs that will minimise their impact on the surrounding environment. The aim is to arrive at design solutions that are more visibly appealing to lineside neighbours, that have construction and installation costs close to that of existing structures and that are relatively easy to install - particularly in hard to access locations.

prettier columns

GRAHAME TAYLOR

Plans for

the rail engineer • July 201476

Page 77: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Each of these criteria is a pretty hard call in its own right, let alone trying to come up with something that satisfies every one of them.

Selecting the bestThe competition was launched in December

2013 and attracted 62 entries. Some may have been a little tongue-in-cheek, but others caused the initial selection panel some real challenges. In the end, ten entries were shortlisted and were awarded up to £15,000 each to fund the next stage of development of their scheme, which included producing a scale model of their design.

The final judging took place at the National Railway museum in York. The scale models of the entries were lined up in amongst the historic steam engines in the Great Hall and the public were given the opportunity to leave comments on the various schemes.

After two intense days the judges, who

included experts in OLE design, industrial architecture and your very own editor of The Rail Engineer, recommended that three designs will go forward to the next stage of development.

The three - along with comments supplied by the entrants - are:

The High Speed T - ‘HST’ by Bystrup Architecture, Design and Engineering

The High Speed T Mast reduces the overhead rail line to two elements; a triangular cable network carrying the power, and the aesthetic T-shaped mast which supports twin systems serving adjacent tracks.

High speed twin rail lines require less land with a single line of T masts between tracks than with traditional masts either side. There are therefore no masts forming an obtrusive barrier between the track edge and its surroundings.

Tomahawk - a design family by COBETomahawk (pictured) is a family of overhead

line structures that minimises the visual impact of the entire line. This is achieved by reducing the overall height, reducing the number of structural elements and by using contemporary materials and manufacturing techniques.

By Keeping It Simple and Straightforward (KISS), the end product is buildable and well suited for its purpose. The simple design will also work visually when repeated hundreds of times throughout the landscape.

Integrated OLS by Moxon Architects with Mott MacDonald

The form of these masts is simple - slender and tapering, the design reduces the visual impact in the landscape. The Integrated OLS scheme simplifies the components of the power line support equipment, replacing insulating pots with built-in insulating properties through the use of a densified laminated wood.

So now it remains for these three proposals to be worked into a form that will stand the final judging. By then, maybe the UC will have some serious competition.

The Bystrup team with a model of their entry.

the rail engineer • July 2014 77

Page 78: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Pods go theDAVID SHIRRES

Professor Martin Lowson was a man with a vision. He was also part of a team that achieved the world’s first man-powered flight, worked on the Saturn V rocket for NASA’s moon programme and held the patent for rotor blade of the Lynx which, at 249 mph, held the helicopter world

speed record.

Yet for all this aeronautical achievement, Lowson’s vision was down to earth and concerned urban transportation. He felt it must be possible to improve a system that involves waiting for a large vehicle that carries people to different destinations. He concluded that a systems engineering approach could provide just-in-time public transport. Such Personalised Rapid Transit (PRT) could provide on-demand travel non-stop to the required destination using small driverless vehicles operating on a segregated track.

To progress this concept, he set up Advanced Transport Systems Ltd (which later became ULTra Global Ltd) in 1995 whilst he was Professor of Aeronautical Engineering at the University of Bristol. After winning an innovative transport competition, the company obtained Government funding for a one-kilometre test track at Cardiff to develop its pod system.

Heathrow showcaseWith his aviation background, it is fitting that

the first use of the ULTra pods should be at Heathrow’s Terminal 5 where a 3.8 km network links the terminal to two business car park stations. To do so, it crosses seven roads and two rivers, passing under the aircraft glide-slope. Since its inception in May 2011, the pods have carried around a million people.

ULTra’s Head of Engineering, David Marron, describes the system as ‘last mile transport’ which is intended to complement other urban transport modes. He also mentions that, although the pod network was not initially part of the Terminal 5 complex, due to the nature of the guideway it was relatively straightforward to retro fit in and around the terminal infrastructure with no disruption to airport operations.

The reason for this is that the elevated guideway only requires a one square metre

base every 20 metres. Such raised structures weigh in at only 0.46 tonnes per metre, compared with those for Light Rail Transit at typically 4.5 tonnes per metre. As a result, infrastructure cost is around a third of light rail’s typical £12 million per kilometre. Also, the lightweight pods have a low loading of 2.2 kN/m2 compared with British standard for footpath loading of 5 kN/m2. Hence their use inside the terminal’s multi storey car park did not require any floor strengthening.

last mile

the rail engineer • July 201478

Page 79: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Heathrow Airport Ltd. funds the system which it considers provides significant commercial benefits to the airport. Hence there is no charge to take a pod to the car park. However, those staying in a hotel next to the car park have the option of paying £5 to use the pod.

OGS - Other Guided SystemAlthough it is not a railway, the Ultra Pod system

is governed by the Office of Rail Regulation as it is subject to ROGS - the Railways and Other Guided Transport Systems (Safety) Regulations 2006. With guided busways excluded from ROGS, the Ultra pods are a rare example of a non-rail system covered by these regulations.

The system consists of a fleet of twenty-one 1.47 metre wide pods running inside a guideway which is a 1.6 metres wide and 0.25 metres deep. The pod’s Autonomous Vehicle Control (AVC) system uses laser sensors to control steering by detecting distance from the inside guideway edge to ensure no contact with it. Should this system fail, however, the guideway will restrain the vehicle.

The guideway columns are typically 18 metres apart with a 10 tonne column load. They can accommodate curves with radii down to five metres and a maximum 10% climb and 6.25% descent gradient. Although the elevated guideway depth of 0.45 metres is visually unobtrusive, fences are required for maintenance staff and emergency passenger egress.

The system can operate at a four-second headway and carry around 2,500 people per hour on a single guideway, the equivalent of a 50-seat bus every 72 seconds. They also only operate when required whereas the timetabled regular buses between airport car parks often have to run lightly loaded or empty.

#IHaveSeenAPodShapedFutureJames May used this hashtag when tweeting

that he would “happily travel the country in a Heathrow Pod”. So why should a Top Gear presenter wish to do this in a vehicle limited to 25 mph? The answer is that the pods do what Martin Lowson intended them to do. The average waiting time is 10-15 seconds, with 80% of passengers having no wait at all. They comfortably seat four people and there is no need to share them with anyone. They also have good disabled access. With vacuum formed acrylic coated panels, air conditioning and LED screens displaying journey information, the pods are well equipped and appealing.

The 21 Heathrow pods were designed and built by Basildon-based ARRK Research and Development which specialises in product development, particularly for the automotive sector. To do so, ARRK used computer modelling to simulate all potential vehicle movements to understand the steering characteristics of this driverless vehicle.

David Marron explains that the ULTra pod uses conventional automotive technologies. Indeed, looking underneath a jacked-up pod reveals four pneumatic rubber types, a wishbone suspension and front wheel drive. With an empty pod weighing 850kg it only requires a 7kw electric motor which is powered by a battery pack weighing 64 kg. This is equivalent to only 5% of gross weight and compares with a typical figure of 50% for many electric vehicles.

the rail engineer • July 2014 79

Page 80: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

Such low battery weight is possible as there are re-charging points at stations and queue lanes which keep batteries fully charged throughout the day - tests have shown that a five minute trip can be recharged in one minute. The batteries are also charged by regenerative braking. In addition, the pods have a fail-safe hold-off electric brake.

Pod operation is managed from a control centre, close to car park station A, which houses the control room, offices and a maintenance area that can accommodate five pods with jacks at two of the berths. The pods have continuous condition monitoring which includes tyre pressures. This enables potentially unreliable vehicles to be taken out of service.

Each pod gets a weekly visual inspection and has a progressive three, six and twelve months maintenance schedule. Although each pod travels 40,000 km per year, according to David it does so in a ‘benign’ environment. With 99% availability, the pods are the most reliable form of transport servicing Heathrow.

De-conflicted slotsWithin the control system, journeys are

generated either from a passenger’s journey selection or by an empty vehicle management system which ensures that empty pods are directed to empty station berths or holding loops. A Central Synchronous Control (CSC) then generates a de-conflicted slot (an air traffic control term) for the journey. This is a route with allocated times for a series of unique path segments.

Each pod has a computer with a network map on which it tracks its location through tachometers and navigation markers in the guideways. In the

unlikely event of the pod being unable to keep to time through its route, the CSC will generate new slots for all moving pods. Navigation markers are installed immediately before each junction. The AVC’s lasers then ensure the pod maintains the correct distance from the continuous guideway edge as the pod follows its programmed direction through the junction.

David explains that, by itself, the CSC does not require a high Safety Integrity Level to control passenger vehicles at speeds above 2 metres per second. Outside station areas there is also an Automatic Vehicle Protection

Green denotes guideway sections that have Automatic Vehicle Protection.

the rail engineer • July 201480

Page 81: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

System (AVPS). This is a fixed block system that does not allow a pod to enter a section that is already occupied.

Two-way data communications for the control systems and the pod’s internal CCTV is provided by Airspan’s ViaNET. This is a broadband network operating on the 5.8 GHz unlicensed band. Each pod has a ViaNET Mobile Terminal Unit which communicates with a series of Airspan ViaNET base stations along the track with the system designed to provide efficient ‘make-before-break’ handover between base stations.

A fitting memorialWhen Professor Lowson died at the age of

75 in June last year, the Heathrow pods had been carrying passengers for 21 months. The Heathrow PRT is a fitting memorial to the work he did to create this system which removes 70,000 Heathrow bus journeys from Heathrow’s roads each year, saving over 200 tonnes of CO2 whilst using 50% less energy per passenger than a bus.

The pods have received a number of awards including ‘Most innovative Transport Project of the Year’ award at London Transport Awards Ceremony and a Gold International Green Apple Award for Environmental Best Practice and Sustainable Development. They are certainly popular as shown by positive Twitter feedback, much with sci-fi comparisons.

Yet, despite its success, PRT has yet to really take off even though it certainly has the potential to do so. For example in new developments the system can reduce land requirements for office park developments by 40% by consolidating car

parking. Ultra Global PRT is currently undertaking a detailed feasibility study for the Brazilian city of Florianopolis and is in discussions with partners in Malaysia, Taiwan, Australia and Saudi Arabia. In India, a contract for an eight-kilometre system with over 200 pods was signed in 2011 but has stalled due to local objections. In the UK, there have been discussions with HS2 and various cities including Glasgow where it is an option for improved access to the airport.

With its proven ability to provide ‘last mile’ urban transportation, PRT offers benefits to society and the rail industry at much lower cost than light rail. However, it is difficult to commercialise these benefits to justify investment in what some might consider an unproven system. Heathrow’s showcase pods provide an opportunity to change this perception, so that perhaps PRT pods will be the norm in decades to come and not just a novelty.

the rail engineer • July 2014 81

Page 82: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

We are winning more and more long-term, challenging rail contracts across the UK. We want you to join us and be part of a team which makes a difference to our industry. Help us to keep growing as a business and we’ll help you to grow your skills and career.

Roles available throughout the UK now:• Project Managers • Construction Managers (Civils)• Project Engineers (Civils) • Project Engineers (Electrical) • P6 Planners• Design Managers • Senior QS, QS and all grades of commercial staff• Electricians

Contact our HR Team on +44(0)20 8953 4144 or [email protected]

Apply online at McNicholas.co.uk/careers

We’re Growing. Want to Grow with Us?

ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING MANAGERDONCASTER | c£65,000 - £70,000 PLUS BENEFITS

“An excellent professional level role in a strong rail business”

Our client is a market leading supplier of engineering services in the growing UK rail industry. The business continues to be successful with a strong customer base and has experienced considerable growth in recent years.

As part of a global group of companies, our client is well positioned for further progress with excellent opportunities for talented professional engineers and a culture of advancement and career development.

The role of Electrical Engineering Manager reports to the Engineering Director and focuses on delivering electrical engineering expertise into a wide range of projects, recognising the increasing innovation, complexity and variety of electrical and electronic systems in rail.

Key activities of the Electrical Engineering Manager will include to:

• Provide a professional level technical lead to the electrical engineering activity

• Maintain and develop a team of electrical engineers able to support and meet customer and project requirements

• Ensure that design and other work is delivered in accordance with industry and legislative standards, managing change processes as required

• Manage the procurement and delivery of third party engineering design, consultancy and approval services

• Identify opportunities and undertake engineering reviews and studies into the development of new and improved products or services, overseeing testing and development

• Support colleagues across the whole engineering function and facilitate relationships with customers, suppliers and a range of third parties in UK rail.

Candidates should ideally be graduate level Electrical Engineers with experience gained at professional levels in a relevant engineering environment in rail or other sectors.

Engineering people management and development experience should be allied to a strong technical background and supported by

the personal and operational skills necessary to be part of the engineering management team at a senior level.

This is an outstanding role for a person seeking to advance their career in a strong and well regarded business in the progressive UK rail industry, that is also part of an established and successful international group.

The role will be based at Doncaster and support can be available for those needing to relocate.

Please submit your cv and covering letter to [email protected] or contact Rod Shaw on 0115 959 9687 with any particular queries.

the rail engineer • July 2014 RECRUITMENT 82

Page 83: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

We are looking to fi ll around 150 roles to support the delivery of the extensive National Electrifi cation Programme.

As one of the largest electrifi cation contractors in Europe ABC Electrifi cation are proud to be part of the Network Rail National Electrifi cation Programme, which aims to electrify hundreds of miles of railway across Britain.

Formed in 2012 ABC Electrifi cation is dedicated to delivering electrifi cation projects that will help to transform the UK’s railways. Founded on collaboration, innovation and agility ABC Electrifi cation prides itself on its ethical delivery principles, ensuring that every project is delivered on time, in full and with zero harm.

As part of the delivery of the regional electrifi cation projects, that form the National Electrifi cation Programme Network Rail will also be recruiting.

We are looking for exceptional people to join us.

COME AND SEE US

• July 15th Hilton Metropole, Birmingham. 4pm - 9pm• July 16th Holiday Inn Rugby, J18. 4pm - 9pm• July 31st Celtic Manor, Newport. 4pm - 9pm

For more information on upcoming recruitment events near you please visit abcel.co.uk or send your CV to [email protected]

Together we make it happencollaborative | ethical | agile | innovative

www.abcel.co.uk

WE ARE NOWRECRUITINGmore than 150 electrifying opportunities.

Play your part in one of the biggest infrastructure projects in the UK for over 100 years.

Just some of the roles we are recruiting for:

Contractors’ Engineering Managers • Design Managers • Possession plannersAssurance & System Engineers • CDM Coordinators • Project ManagersTrainee Linesman • Linesman • Supervisors • Senior Supervisors • Safe work Leaders Construction Managers • Operations Managers • Training Managers • OHL trainers

Page 84: The Rail Engineer - Issue 117 - July 2014

AECOM has built an impressive portfolio in rail, making us a global leader in planning, design, project management and asset support services. 2014 is proving a very good year, working across Europe and the Middle East. We are delivering a large number of high profile, high speed projects in the UK, transforming the quality of rail infrastructure from the north of England to London.

We are recruiting rail professionals with a wide range of skill sets and experience. Could you help key clients, such as Transport for London and Network Rail, to see further and go further?

OPPORTUNITIES FOR ALL EXPERIENCE LEVELS:

■ Head of Signalling ■ Rail Bridge assessment Engineers ■ Rail Design Engineers ■ E & P Design Engineers ■ OHLE Design Engineers ■ Permanent Way Design ■ Civil /Structural Design ■ Cad Design Engineers ■ MEP – Stations/Depot Design ■ Project Management

NEW PROJECTS INCLUDE:

■ CAFA Rail Bridge Assessments ■ Northern Hub ■ Riyadh Metro ■ Crossrail 2 Station Feasibility

YOU ARE WARMLY INVITED TO THESE AECOM OPEN DAYS.

MANCHESTERThe Midland Hotel, Peter StreetWednesday 9th July 1 - 7pm

EDINBURGHJury’s Inn Hotel, Jeffrey StreetThursday 10th July 1 – 7pm

CROYDONJury’s Inn Hotel, Wellesley RoadWednesday 16th July 1 – 7pm

For a full list of vacancies please visit http://aecom.jobs or register your interest with [email protected]

AECOM is an equal opportunities employer

CAN YOU HELP OUR CLIENTS TO SEE FURTHER, GO FURTHER?