17
The role of HR

The role of HR. Comparative HRM: Theory & Practice

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The role of HR. Comparative HRM: Theory & Practice

The role of HR

Page 2: The role of HR. Comparative HRM: Theory & Practice

Comparative HRM: Theory & Practice

Page 3: The role of HR. Comparative HRM: Theory & Practice

Universalism vs Contextual

• Universalism-Contextual debate • Is there a best practice approach? • Convergence as a 3rd alternative

Page 4: The role of HR. Comparative HRM: Theory & Practice

International ContextIncludes:International Agreements

Corporate Strategy

National ContextIncludes:culture political/legislative economic social patterns of ownership etc.

HRM StrategyIncludes:integration devolvement to line employment policies involvement policies reward policies work systems etc.

National HRM ContextIncludes:education/training labor markets trade unions industrial relations etc.

HRM PracticeIncludes:selection performance appraisal rewards development industrial relations communication etc.

Environment Organization

Contextual Model of HRM

Page 5: The role of HR. Comparative HRM: Theory & Practice

Employee Champion

Administrative Expert

Operational Focus

Strategic Focus

Change Agent

Strategic Partner

HR Role Framework

Source: Conner J. Ulrich D. (1996). “Human Resource Roles: Creating Value Not Rhetoric” Human Resource Planning September

People

Process

Page 6: The role of HR. Comparative HRM: Theory & Practice

Performance Selection Appraisal

Rewards

Development

The Michigan Matching Model of HRM

Page 7: The role of HR. Comparative HRM: Theory & Practice

StakeholderinterestsShareholdersManagementEmployee groupsGovernmentCommunityUnions

HRM PolicyChoicesEmployee

influenceHuman

Resource flowReward systemsWork systems

HR OutcomesCommitmentCompetenceCongruenceCosteffectiveness

Long-termconsequencesIndividual well

beingOrganizational

effectivenessSocietal well-

beingSituationalfactorsWork force

characteristicsBusiness strategy

and conditionsManagement

philosophyLabor marketUnionsTask technologyLaws and societal

values

The Harvard Model of Human Resource Management

Page 8: The role of HR. Comparative HRM: Theory & Practice

Role of HRM departments

• Differing roles in different countries.• Some more administrative some more

strategic• As some of the administrative work is

outsourced or computerised, there can be more emphasis on strategic role.

Page 9: The role of HR. Comparative HRM: Theory & Practice

Role of HRM department

• Is it represented on the board of directors• Is it involved in strategic management• Where was the HR manager recruited

Page 10: The role of HR. Comparative HRM: Theory & Practice

Moving from a centralised to decentralised HR model

• Trend towards management through cost-centre profit-centre based approach

• Line managers are more in contact with employees. They have the main responsibility for performance.

• Issue of responsiveness to customers.• A move towards reducing overhead and

realtime staffing.

Page 11: The role of HR. Comparative HRM: Theory & Practice

Pressures slowing the devolvement to line managers

• Line managers not enthusiastic to take on HR activities

• Line managers may regard HR activities as a lower priority

• Not enough training and support to line managers in HR duties

Page 12: The role of HR. Comparative HRM: Theory & Practice

Integration and devolvement

• Degree of integration of HRM into business strategy

• Degree of devolvement: the degree to which HRM practive involves and gives responsibility to line managers rather than personnel specialits

Page 13: The role of HR. Comparative HRM: Theory & Practice

Mechanics (low integration and low devolvement)

• Specialist, but limited skills and interests of HRM practitioners.– Professional personnel manager with higher’

imperatives than the organization. Belief that specialist knowledge is beyond the scope of untrained people.

– Focus on the mechanical requirements of the function.

– Increasing isolation from strategic interests of the organization.

Page 14: The role of HR. Comparative HRM: Theory & Practice

wild west (low integration and high devolvement)

Individual manager free to develop his/her own employee relationship.

lncreased power to hire and fire, reward and develop employees.

Potential for incoherence, inconsistency and strong employee reactions.

Page 15: The role of HR. Comparative HRM: Theory & Practice

Guarded strategists (high integration but low devolvement)

• Specialists powerful figures in the organization.

• Close liaison with senior managers to develop strategy.

• Large and influential departments with centralized control of policies.

• Better line managers frustrated with lack of control, poor managers welcome lack of responsibility.

Page 16: The role of HR. Comparative HRM: Theory & Practice

Pivotal (high integration and high devolvement)

Senior personnel managers act as catalysts, facilitators and co-ordinators.Small, but powerful departments.Monitoring of and internal consulting on HRM developments.Responsibility and authority devolved to the line.

Problems with resourcing high-calibre business- orientated HRM managers.

Page 17: The role of HR. Comparative HRM: Theory & Practice