24
3/1/2011 1 A Prescription Drug Abuse Summit: The Role of Prescription Monitoring Programs Georgia State University Atlanta, GA March 2, 2011 What Do Other State’s PMPs Tell Us About Prescriptions Issued by Georgia Prescribers?

The Role of Prescription Monitoring Programs - Justice · PDF fileThe Role of Prescription Monitoring Programs ... • See PMP Center of Excellence Notes from the Field ... The Role

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

3/1/2011

1

A Prescription Drug Abuse Summit:The Role of 

Prescription Monitoring Programs Georgia State University

Atlanta, GA

March 2, 2011

What Do Other State’s PMPs Tell Us About Prescriptions Issued 

by Georgia Prescribers?

3/1/2011

2

Controlled Substances Dosage Units Prescribed by Georgia Prescribers but

Dispensed in Other States AK

WA*ME

NH

VT

AL

AR

CACO

ID

IL INIA

MN

MO

MT

NENV

ND

OH

OK

OR

TN

UT

AZ

SD

NM

VA

WYMI

GA

KS

MS

WINY

PA

KYNC

SC

NHMARICTNJDEMD

WV

0 4 Million Dosage Units

DC

HI

TX LAFL

*Washington has temporarily suspended its PMP operations due to budgetary constraints.

0.4 Million Dosage Units

3.0 Million Dosage Units

9.8 million Dosage Units

12.5 Million Dosage Units

Average Number of Patients per GA Prescriberfor Prescriptions Filled in SC in 2009,

by GA Zip Code

Legend

Average number of

patients per prescriber0.000 - 1.429

1.430 - 6.250

6.251 - 19.000

19.001 - 41.412

41.413 - 73.500

3/1/2011

3

Average Number of Patients per GA Prescriberfor Prescriptions Filled in AL in 2009,

by GA Zip Code

Legend

Average number of

patients per prescriber0.00 - 5.22

5.23 - 18.50

18.51 - 46.83

46.84 - 148.00

148.01 - 437.50

Average Number of Prescriptions per Patient, 2009Prescriptions Originating in GA and Filled in AL,

by GA Zip Code

Legend

Average number of

prescriptions per patient

0.00

0.01 - 1.88

1.89 - 3.33

3.34 - 6.00

6.01 - 10.20

3/1/2011

4

GA Zip Codes with More Than 100 Patients per Prescriberand More Than Two Prescriptions per Patient, on Average,

for Prescriptions Filled in AL in 2009

Legend

GA Zip Codes meeting (1) or

not meeting (0) the criteria0

1

What are 

Prescription Monitoring Programs (PMPs)?

3/1/2011

5

Prescription Monitoring ProgramGOALS               

• Education & Information

• Public Health Initiatives

• Early Intervention& Prevention

• Investigation & Enforcement• Investigation & Enforcement

PMP System Overview

Dispensers

Overview

State PMP

PrescribersPharmacists

Data Submitted

Reports Sent

Reports Sent

Reports

Law Enforcement & Professional 

Licensing Agencies

Reports Sent

*Other groups may also receive reports other than those listed

3/1/2011

6

Data Collected from Pharmacies

• PMPs Collect Controlled Substances:22 collect Schedules II ‐ V

15 collect Schedules II – IV

2 collect Schedule II only

1 collect Schedules II & III 

• Some Collect Non‐Controlled Substances13 collect carisoprodol (Soma®)13 collect carisoprodol (Soma ) 

6 collect tramadol (Ultram®) 

• Electronic Data Collection ‐ Batch Reporting

• Reporting Frequency  varies ‐ 7 to 30 days

Prescription Information Collected

P ti t id tifi ti• Patient identification: 

• Name & Address

• DOB & Gender

• Prescriber Information

• Dispensing Pharmacy Informationp g y

• Drug Information, e.g.

• NDC # = name, type, strength, manufacturer

• Quantity & date dispensed

3/1/2011

7

Statutorily Authorized State PMPs, 1939 ‐201044

Harold Rogers Program Started

PMPs

Status of PMPs—September 2010AK

ID

MNMT ND

OR

WA*

SDWY

MI

ME

WINY

PA

NHMARICTNJ

VT

AL

AR

CACO

IL INIA

MO

NENV

OH

OKTN

UT

AZ NM

VA

WY

GA

KS

HITX

MS

PA

LA

KYNC

SC

FL

NJDEMD

DC

WV

Research is current as of May 28, 2010

Operational PDMPs

Enacted PDMP legislation, but program not yet operational

Legislation pending

*Washington has temporarily suspended its PMP operations due to budgetary constraints.

GU

3/1/2011

8

PMP STATISTICS

P l ti St t ith th i d PMP• Population ‐ States with authorized PMPs 

2004 2010

Number 145 million 273 million

% of US 50% 89%  

• Prescription Records ‐ during 2008 

• 29 Operational PMPs

• 285 million Controlled Substances Prescriptions 

Number of PDMP Reports Produced Per Year4,500,000 

2,000,000 

2,500,000 

3,000,000 

3,500,000 

4,000,000 

2,596% Increase from 2003

Harold Rogers Program Started

500,000 

1,000,000 

1,500,000 

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Est. 2007 Est. 2008

3/1/2011

9

PDMP REPORTS BY TYPE OF USER2006 - 2007

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

0

0.2

CA ID KY NV OH OK VA

Prescribers & Pharmacists Law Enf . & Regulatory

Percent of PMP Reports to Prescribers and PharmacistsbyTypeofPMPAgencyPharmacists by Type of PMP Agency

# of  Type of     % Reports to

PDMPs Agency Prescribers &Pharmacists

3     Boards of Pharmacy       90% ‐ 96%

3 Law Enforcement 90% 96%3    Law Enforcement  90% ‐ 96%

3/1/2011

10

PMPs Are Effective!

Prescription Monitoring Program Center of Excellence

Briefing on PMP Effectiveness_______________________________________________

2.1 Prescription Monitoring Programs: An Effective Tool in Curbing the Prescription Drug Abuse EpidemicFebruary 2011

3/1/2011

11

Physician Use of Data 

• Physicians can stop being victimized by doctor shoppers• Physicians can stop being victimized by doctor shoppers

• Physicians can use as clinical tool to improve care

• OH study of Emergency Department• 41% of prescribes who received PMP report altered prescribing for 

patients receiving multiple simultaneous narcotics prescriptions. 

• Of these providers, 63% prescribed no narcotics or fewer.

39% ib d• 39% prescribed more.

California Physician Survey Haveyou changed yourprescribing practicing toHave you changed your prescribing practicing to a patient as a result of the PDMP Reports? 

No

Yes

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

No Opinion

No

3/1/2011

12

Kentucky Survey –PhysiciansHow important is a KASPER patient report in helping you make your decision about which drug to prescribe? 

Neutral

Somewhat Important

Very Important

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%

Not Important

Somewhat Unimportant

Neutral

Kentucky Survey –All UsersKASPER (KY PMP) is an excellent tool for identifying potential 

‘doctor shoppers’?

Neutral

Somewhat Agree

Strongly Agree

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Strongly Disagree

Somewhat Disagree

3/1/2011

13

Louisiana PMP ‐ 5 Doctor Shoppers’ Prescriptions per MonthSept. Announcement  to  Jan.PMP Implementation

15

20

25

30

rescriptions

EJ

MH

CK

0

5

10

June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec

P

2008

DP

CQ

Notes from the Field :   Wyoming PMPUnsolicited Prescription Histories

M th 10/2008 9/2009Solicited Prescription Histories per

66

39

32 31

40

3330

40

50

60

70

ber

s o

f h

isto

ries

per Month, 10/2008 – 9/2009

681 682

750726

685

730

651

773

949

600

700

800

900

1000

ber

s o

f h

isto

ries

p pMonth, 10/2008 – 9/2009

27 2826

18

26

15

0

10

20

Nu

mb

Source: Wyoming PDMP

524

459

541

300

400

500

Nu

mb

Source: Wyoming PDMP

3/1/2011

14

MA PMP - Prescriber Survey: Preliminary Findings162 baseline surveys received thus far162 baseline surveys received thus far

• 91% of respondents said unsolicited reports “very” or “somewhat helpful”

• Only 14% said they were “aware of all or most of other prescribers” in report

O l 13% id “b d t k l d i l di t ti t

27

• Only 13% said “based on current knowledge, including report, patient appears to have legitimate medical reason for Rxs from multiple prescribers”

MA data, preliminary – decreased # of Rx, prescribers and pharmacies for probable doctor shoppersSource: MA PMP and P. Kreiner et al., Brandeis University

Quantities of Pain Relievers 

50 000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

45,000

50,000

• XPDMP = Proactive PDMPs (issue unsolicited reports)

• Non XPDMP =

0

5,000

10,000

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

non-XPDMP XPDMP

• Non‐XPDMP = Non‐Proactive PDMPs

Source: An Evaluation of Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs; Simeone Associates; 2006 

3/1/2011

15

12.3

Death rates for drug overdoses that were unintentional or of undetermined intent by state, 2007

8.2

7.4

4.8

8.7

3.1

3.7

4.1

5.3

10.57.1

10 0

7.6

10.8

9.8

20.4

10 2

9.2

10.0

16.8

8 6

7.111.7

15.1

9.7

18.4

10.5

12.5

11.1

14.2

12.7

21.1

12.5

10.5

10.4

16.0 NH 11.7VT 7.9MA 12.5RI 11.1CT 11.1NJ 7.5DE 9.8MD 12.5DC 8 8

9.4

3.1-9.0 9.1-11.4 11.5-21.1

Age-adjusted rate per 100,000 population

8.2

10.0

17.9

10.2 8.6

9.9

13.6

9.0

DC 8.8

Source:  National Vital Statistics System, accessed through WONDER underlying cause mortality files,

PMP Data ‐ Assists Investigations & Reduce Time

• KY PMP Survey – 73% Law Enforcement Officers find PMP is an excellent tool for obtaining evidence.

• GAO Report – PMPs reduce average time for doctor shopper investigations:• KY  ‐ from 156 to 16 days

• NV – from 120 to 20 daysNV  from 120 to 20 days

• 2010 National Law Enforcement PMP Meeting ‐‐Unanimously concurred PMPs are an important law enforcement tool.  

3/1/2011

16

PMPs Save Law Enforcement Costs & Monitor Treatment

• NV Pre Criminal Intervention Program enrolls & monitors doctor• NV Pre‐Criminal Intervention Program – enrolls & monitors doctor shoppers in rehab – saving investigative and prosecution $• See PMP Center of Excellence Notes from the Field

• Drug Courts in KY use PMP data to monitor compliance

• Drug Treatment Programs in ME use PMP data at patient intake d i di ll th ft t it liand periodically thereafter to monitor compliance

• Medical Director – Opioid Addiction Treatment Program – PMP data very important• See PMP Center of Excellence Notes from the Field

Other Ways aPMP Can Help Georgia 

3/1/2011

17

Rates of Doctor Shopping Associated with OxyContin in MA, 1996

Rates per 100 of doctor shopping, by quintileRates per 100 of doctor shopping, by quintile00 - 88 - 14.2914.29 - 4040 - 100

"Source: Massachusetts Dept. of Public Health in partnership with Brandeis University"

Rates of Doctor Shopping Associated w ith OxyContin in M A, 1998

R t f d t h i 100 i tilRates of doctor shopping x 100, per quintile00 - 1.691.69 - 3.193.19 - 8.118.11 - 73.33

"Source: Massachusetts Dept. of Public Health in partnership with Brandeis University"

3/1/2011

18

2005 Prescriptions Associated with Questionable Activity(Rates per 100,000 Prescriptions) by Pharmacy Town

Questionable activity rates01 10951 - 10951096 - 18971898 - 28822883 - 14184

"Source: Massachusetts Dept. of Public Health in partnership with Brandeis University"

2005 Opioid-related Health ProblemsRate per 100,000 by Town

Overdose

Rate per 100,000 Quintiles00 01 19 820.01 - 19.8219.82 - 37.537.5 - 56.9256.92 - 225.51

"Source: Massachusetts Dept. of Public Health in partnership with Brandeis University"

3/1/2011

19

A Georgia PMP Can

Id tif h t i t tIdentify where to intervene to:

• Stop Doctor Shopping

• Stop Forgeries

• Stop Pill Mills

• Hold Drug Take Back initiatives

• Intensify Substance Abuse Prevention efforts

• Assign Opioid Abuse Treatment Programs

Georgia PMP will be a Disease Reporting System

• Persons meeting DMS IV criteria for dependence on or abuse of• Persons meeting DMS‐IV criteria for dependence on or abuse of opioids in US are increasing.• Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM‐

IV) (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 1994).

• This diagnosis includes persons who are addicted.

• GA PMP ‐ a diagnostic tool to help prescribers identify cases meeting these DMS IV criteriameeting these DMS IV criteria.

• Like other diseases, persons who meet criteria are at high risk for acute episodes leading to overdoses and deaths.

• Many deaths 

• are preventable with proper intervention.

3/1/2011

20

Georgia PMP Can Help Save Lives 

• Persons meeting criteria for dependent on or abuse of opioids are• Persons meeting criteria for dependent on or abuse of opioids are at high risk of death. 

• US death rate among nonmedical pain reliever users – estimated:    192.3 per 100,000 or 22 times higher than general population in 2005

• PMPs can identify many of these people.

• If PMPs identify them and intervene, many lives can be saved

Dependence on or Abuse of Illicit Drugs, Marijuana, Cocaine, and Pain Relievers in the Past Year ‐Persons Aged 12 or Older –NSDUH, 

2002‐092002 09

4.3

4.2

4.5

4.1

4.2

3.9

4.24.3

1.5 1 4 1 4 1.5 1.6

1.7 1.71.9

1.5 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.7

1.6 1.4

2

3

4

5

be

rs in

Mill

ion

s Marijuana

Pain Relievers

Cocaine

1.5 1.4 1.41.1

0

1

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Nu

mb

3/1/2011

21

Positive Identification for CS Prescriptions ‐1

Step 1: Pharmacies required to check photo ID of person pickingStep 1: Pharmacies required to check photo ID of person picking up Controlled Substances (CS) Prescriptions

• Multiple States require this 

• But most waive requirement when pharmacist “knows” person (Board of Pharmacies’ laws or regulations)

• MA PMP with COE assistance found 40% of Schedule II Rx are dropped off or picked up by person other than patient.

• MA  is expanding the required check from Schedule II to all Schedules ‐ 1/1/2011

Positive Identification for CS Prescriptions ‐2

Step 2: PMPs require reporting ID of person picking up CS RxStep 2: PMPs require reporting ‐ ID of person picking up CS  Rx

• Some PMPs require reporting of ID #, e.g. MA, MI and OK  

• MA is expanding requirement from Schedule  II to all Schedules  ‐ 1/1/2011• BACDS  opposed 

• But MA is proceeding

• OK is experimenting with card swipe systems• Capture ID info and add to Rx record to PMP

• Verify ID is valid

• ASAP Versions 4.0 & 4.1 have fields for good reporting – ID #, type of ID, issuing authority, relationship to patient, and name  

3/1/2011

22

How   PMP Center of Excellence and 

Training and Technical Assistance Centerat Brandeis University 

CanAssistCan Assist 

www.pmpalliance.org

3/1/2011

23

Prescription Monitoring Program Center of Excellence

Notes From the Field_____________________________________________________________________________________

Prescription Monitoring Program Center of Excellence

PMP Management ToolsPMP Management Tools _____________________________________________________________________________________

Prescription Monitoring Program Center of Excellence

PMP Study Analysis _______________________________________________

3/1/2011

24

Contact Information

John Eadie, MPA

Director

PMP Center of Excellence

Brandeis University

518‐429‐6397

[email protected]